Transparent DOJ and FBI Desperation: New York Times Attempts “Trump Operation” Justification…

Immediately following confirmation by Senator Lindsey Graham about the origin of the 2016 FBI Counterintelligence Operation against candidate Donald Trump, The New York Times, via Clinton’s favorite voice Maggie Haberman, pushes out an article attempting to cloud, obfuscate and justify the joint FBI and DOJ surveillance operation against Trump.

The timing, content and presentation of the disinformation is transparent in the intended motive.  More and more people are recognizing the FBI application to the FISA court was based on political information, the Steele Dossier, assembled by political operatives and used by political operatives within the DOJ National Security Division and FBI Counterintelligence Division.

As such, now the people at risk within the FBI and DOJ attempt to shift the focus away from the political document known as the “Steele Dossier” and toward the useful distraction of a short-term volunteer Trump campaign aide, George Papadopoulos.

This approach, originated by the current sense within the intelligence community, indicates all dossier scrutiny is directly over the target; and the leadership knows the risk.  This is why the upper-tier management of the FBI and DOJ have refused prior questions about the Dossier’s use.  The DOJ/FBI officials know the outline of how the dossier was assembled implicates them in a verifiable conspiracy.

As to the substance of the NYT justification it is absurd on its face.  Claiming George Papadopoulos speaking to an Australian politician in London mid May 2016, and a conversation about Russians having dirt on Hillary Clinton, as the origin of the FBI’s Russian probe is silly.

Immediately this nonsense was noted by people who have followed the back-story closely.  There are three threads to see the deconstruction of the NY Times proposition: Imperator Rex has one – HERE; nameredacted has another – HERE; and I added one HERE

I’ll weave some information in a summary form using all three:

Maggie Haberman is NOT a journalist, but a propagandist – a total Clinton partisan & Obama cult member, with extreme TDS. EVERYTHING she writes should be immediately interpreted in that light. Haberman was exposed by Wikileaks during the campaign as a KEY Clinton ‘media surrogate’, one of Hillary’s ‘earned media’ – I call them Clinton media SLAVES. See HERE

We all know what’s happening here. The narrative now is that George Papadopoulos, who served as a volunteer on Trump’s campaign team for a few months, was the insitigator for Comey’s FBI to open up their ‘Trump-Russia’ investigation in July 2016. Apparently it was all based on tittle-tattle & gossip between Papadopoulos & an Australian diplomat over drinks in London in May. NOTHING AT ALL to do with the infamous Fusion GPS dossier. Quote:

“It was not, as Mr. Trump and other politicians have alleged, a dossier compiled by a former British spy hired by a rival campaign. Instead, it was firsthand information from one of America’s closest intelligence allies.”

Continue reading the deconstruction HERE.

George Papadopoulos talking in May 2016, is likely about this *open and public information* from April 2016 – SEE HERE.

Nowhere in the Joint Analysis Report [Comey, Brennan and Clapper construct] is anything about George Papadopoulos even hinted or alluded to.

The NYT outline is also nonsense based on common sense. Papadopoulos was so important that:

July 15th 2016 Comey opens counterintel investigation into Russian collusion. January 15th 2017 FBI visits Papadopoulos for first time.

The FBI waited for six months to talk to him?

If George Papadopoulos was so important to the FBI “investigation” why did all “intelligence” agencies released their final JAR report without ever speaking to him? Not even once?

No. What the NYT has in the article is a well constructed and brutally familiar pattern of what journalism looks like when the IC use reporters to cover their tracks and create a justification based on a false premise.

The Fusion GPS, Glenn Simpson, Mary Jacoby, Nellie Ohr etc. and subsequent Christopher Steele origin of the FISA application source material is a risk to the former leadership within the DOJ National Security Division and FBI Counterintelligence Division.

That’s why both FBI and DOJ sides of this intelligence operation need to create a false origin. The actual FISA application content is a much more explosive risk. Use your common sense logic hat.

COMMON SENSE: If a Papadopolous conversation in May 2016 was the origin, the source material, of the FBI counterintelligence operation, then why were they denied a FISA application in June/July 2016?

Why would the DOJ and FBI intelligence officials withhold this information from all congressional committees for a year, refuse to discuss it, yet somehow just release it to The NY Times?  If it was simply innocuous – Think logically.

More on Papadopolous HERE

Continue reading the deconstruction HERE.

The 2016 FBI counterintelligence operation was surveillance on the Trump Campaign and was thinly disguised under the fraudulent auspices of a FISA warrant, sold as a defense of U.S. democracy from Russia, which permitted the wiretaps and surveillance etc.

The DOJ involvement surrounds legal arguments, processing of FISA applications, and use of the legal system to support the FBI operation with actionable legal framing (against Trump). The DOJ National Security Division carried out that collaboration with the FBI.

The back-story to the FISA warrant is the cornerstone to expose this entire charade. The back-story to the FISA warrant contains both the FBI and the DOJ upper-management and leadership.  The back-story to the FISA warrant outlines the conspiracy and the nature of the relationships amid all the conspirators.

Expose the back-story and the entire ‘muh Russia’ conspiracy fraud collapses under the weight of sunlight, and all of the co-conspirators are discovered simultaneously.

That’s why the NYT was used to create chaff and countermeasures.  Nothing more.

The Big Ugly



IG Stimulated Releases of Information:

♦Release #1 was the FBI Agent Strzok and Attorney Lisa Page story; and the repercussions from discovering their politically motivated bias in the 2015/2016 Clinton email investigation and 2016/2017 Russian Election investigation.

♦Release #2 outlined the depth of FBI Agent Strzok and FBI Attorney Page’s specific history in the 2016 investigation into Hillary Clinton to include the changing of the wording [“grossly negligent” to “extremely careless”] of the probe outcome delivered by FBI Director James Comey.

♦Release #3 was the information about DOJ Deputy Bruce Ohr being in contact with Fusion GPS at the same time as the FISA application was submitted and granted by the FISA court; which authorized surveillance and wiretapping of candidate Donald Trump; that release also attached Bruce Ohr and Agent Strzok directly to the Steele Dossier.

♦Release #4 was information that Deputy Bruce Ohr’s wife, Nellie Ohr, was an actual contract employee of Fusion GPS, and was hired by F-GPS specifically to work on opposition research against candidate Donald Trump. Both Bruce Ohr and Nellie Ohr are attached to the origin of the Christopher Steele Russian Dossier.

♦Release #5 was the specific communication between FBI Agent Strzok and FBI Attorney Page. The 10,000 text messages that included evidence of them both meeting with Asst. FBI Director Andrew McCabe to discuss the “insurance policy” against candidate Donald Trump in August of 2016.

This entry was posted in AG Jeff Sessions, Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Clinton(s), Cold Anger, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Desperately Seeking Hillary, Donald Trump, Donald Trump Transition, Election 2016, FBI, media bias, President Trump, Russia, THE BIG UGLY, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

368 Responses to Transparent DOJ and FBI Desperation: New York Times Attempts “Trump Operation” Justification…

  1. MissionCreep says:

    I would think the FISA court application would include both the Steele dossier and the 3rd string campaign aide meeting with Russians, so when the application is eventually becomes public the MSM can point to Papadopoulos as the reason for spying on the Trump campaign and ignore the dossier.


    • SmilinJackAbbott says:

      Wray’s been grossly negligent in all this.

      This excerpt from the article is nearly identical to the nonsense Strzok leaked to the WSJ in an unconvincing attempt to explain his insurance policy:

      ‘Others believed that the possibility of a compromised presidential campaign was so serious that it warranted the most thorough, aggressive tactics. Even if the odds against a Trump presidency were long, these agents argued, it was prudent to take every precaution.’

      Strzok, McCabe & Page were exposed months ago by the IG. Instead of firing all 3 on the spot and revoking security clearances Wray left them in place for months to trawl the investigation files until one of them found this nonsense. He/she then telegraphs the alibi to the NYT for co-conspirators to read so they’re all on the same page.

      None of which could have happened if Wray had done his job.


  2. Mountaineer says:

    I love how Sundance tagged Maggie in every tweet!
    Excellent, Smithers…

    Liked by 2 people

  3. Mickey Wasp says:

    The book, Gekaufte Journalisten (literally, “Bought Journalists”), authored by Udo Ulfkotte.
    Brings his stunning revelations to light. Admitting first his own guilt of participating in the destructive underworld of journalism, Ulfkotte fearlessly names other collaborators in his latest work and calls for a return to a free and morally-upright press.

    “What is insidious, as Ulfkotte confesses – intelligence agencies use “unofficial covers”, people working for the agency but not actually on its payroll as agents. It is a broad, loose network of “friends,” doing one another favors. Many are lead journalists from numerous countries. This informality provides plausible deniability for both sides.

    In Spring 2004, a German politician asked Ulfkotte to spy on a political rival, offering a large sum of money for the criminal activity. Refusing, Ulfkotte at last realized and vowed “never again.” Almost immediately thereafter, the government searched his home and office a total of six times, alleging he had revealed “official secrets.” Clearly a reprisal. There is rampant cooperation of the “Fourth Estate” with the world’s largest intelligence agencies, trans-Atlantic organizations, banks, corporations and billionaires, making it into a political “fifth column.” ”

    ~ Does all this sound eerily familiar? ~

    Liked by 4 people

  4. recoverydotgod says:

    I suspect all roads, including Alexander Downer, will point back to the Steele Dossier.

    Once Trump announced his initial foreign policy team, I’m sure each of those people were being looked at by many domestic and foreign players. So it would not be surprising to me if George Papadopolous ended up in a bar with Alexander Downer, talking and drinking.

    The NYT’s backdrop for me is McCain’s David Kramer being subpoenaed to testify to the sources in the dossier in front of the House Intelligence committee. As I see it, Kramer is in the hot seat. McCain as well.

    in 2007, under the moderation of then NATO Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer John McCain and Alexander Downer were on a panel together along with Germany Defense Minister Franz Josef Jung at the 43rd Munich Conference on Security Policy. The panel discussion was entitled “NATO’s success and failure depend on Afghanistan”

    Transforming NATO: New Allies, Missions, and Capabilities
    By Ivan Dinev Ivanov
    Bibliography page 268

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Fhilpoi says:

    Could Maggie be one of the three journos on the GPS payroll? Hmmmmmm……

    Liked by 1 person

  6. D. Manny says:

    Well done, Sundance! Well done.

    The final nail on the coffin to this whole fish story from the NYT is a NYT’s article:

    2016-10-31 New York Times story, “Investigating Russia, FBI Sees No Clear Link to Trump.

    Not once is Papadopoulos’ name mentioned at the point the NYT claims the FBI found no collusion.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Peg_C the Deplorable says:

      Reading through Sundance’s tweet storm masterful troll of Haberman last evening made my New Year’s Eve. I’m rarely on Twitler and found the whole thing beautifully laid out on Gateway Pundit.
      The gigantic edifice of Fake News and poli/intel corruption swampiness must be torn down!


  7. TwoLaine says:

    Let’s tee up Maggie Haberman’s bank accounts and see what kinf of $$$ are being paid for her to teeing up stories for the Crooked DOJ and FBI operatives. I’m guessing she’s one of those who was paid to deliver pee-pee stories. Subpoena her and haul her into Congress to testify.

    If you are being paid to print a story, you are not a journalist, you are an ad man/woman. Therefore, the 1st amendment should not apply to what is merely an ad for the benefit of one political party over another.

    Liked by 2 people

  8. cali says:

    Well also consider that this guy Papadopoulus acted as a mole since he worked for Hillary while she was SOS. He inserted himself to another republican campaign before he switched to the Trump campaign. That nothing good came from that is obvious knowing that Hillary hired him for a while and at the UNESCO outfit.
    He thought he could find dirt on behalf of Hillary while a short while on the Trump campaign. The biggest problem is that it will be revealed that they used this dossier at the FISA court to gain legal permission to spy about everyone involved with Donald Trump including his family members.
    They are not dumb enough to think that should that be proven as fact they will face legal action one way or the other that also includes the entrapment of Flynn who just so happen having his case before a judge that sat on the FISA court that approved their illegal spying based on a document so far fetched that induces a suspension of disbelief. Then that judge involved just so happen to step down and recuse himself. No reason given of ‘why’. I think we know why.


  9. Caius Lowell says:

    This research is spectacular…
    Thank you so much SD — you are a great American!

    Liked by 1 person

  10. auscitizenmom says:

    They are certainly pushing this “new” info really really hard on the FOX news shows today. They are really really desperate. Funny thing that this has not been heard of before now. LOL Guess it took them a while to think it up.


  11. Joe S says:

    Liked by 2 people

    • Joe S says:

      Liked by 2 people

  12. Sassy says:

    Maybe this has been mentioned before, but what do you make of the second sentence?

    “Not long after, however, he (Papadopoulos) opened up to Mr. Downer, the Australian diplomat, about his contacts with the Russians. It is unclear whether Mr. Downer was fishing for that information that night in May 2016.”

    Why would the reporter wonder or even mention the question about whether or not Downer was “fishing” for information about Papadopoulos’s “contacts with the Russians?” This sentence struck me as odd.


  13. AKM says:

    Classic thread on twitter which all Sundance readers will love …….. on the NYT’s true and thrilling expose of why the Dossier is now old hat………

    Liked by 1 person

  14. AKM says:

    Did I mention that this thread points out that the NYT article is as thrilling as its true.


  15. doc00 says:

    Another interesting and logical point to consider is that if this conversation was not important enough to support the first FISA warrant, then then the need to develop the Trump Dossier was even more important to gain the 2nd FISA attempt. Every time the Democrat spin machine cycles, they actually expose a Democrat Partisan or dig the Dossier Hole deeper. They may qualify for the Darwin Award at this pace.

    Liked by 2 people

  16. florida91 says:

    Maggie Haberman, like Amanda Robb, is also employed by the DNC and the Clinton Foundation/Soros funded Rolling Stone Magazine to muddy the waters with propganda disguised as ‘journalism’. Their orders are to destroy anyone attempting to debunk the Deep States’ Trump/Russia fantasy. My family has been harassed and threatened by Amanda Robb and her colleague Cara Simonson. Both were paid to ‘shut us up’ because we were trying to connect the dots between the Podestas, Jeffrey Epstine and the Clintons to human sex trafficking.

    Liked by 1 person

  17. rosa parks says:

    “What the NYT has in the article is a well constructed and brutally familiar pattern of what journalism looks like when the IC use reporters to cover their tracks and create a justification based on a false premise.” – Operation Mockingbird


  18. workwithus says:

    Sorry if already posted.Good stuff on this subject.Worth the listen. and


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s