A Counterintelligence Timeline With a Bill Priestap and James Comey Reminder…

UPDATED – In the past few days/weeks, thanks to some revealing information amid the various investigators of the DC swamp, we have been introduced to some previously unknown people.  Timeline HERE

Names like FBI Agent Peter Strzok; his mistress FBI Attorney Lisa Page; their ideological comrade Asst FBI Director Andrew McCabe; along with DOJ Deputy Bruce Ohr; and his wife, Fusion-GPS contract employee Nellie Ohr.  Fusion-GPS founder Glenn Simpson and his wife Mary Jacoby.  These are a few of the recent names that have hit the headlines as a result of ongoing investigations into the politicization of the FBI and DOJ.

But there’s one name conspicuously absent, FBI Director of Counterintelligence, Bill Priestap.

When you understand how central Bill Priestap is to the entire 2016/2017 ‘Russian Conspiracy Operation‘, the absence of his name, amid all others, creates a curiosity. I wrote a twitter thread about him recently because it seems rather unfathomable his name has not been a part of any of the recent story-lines.

Bill Priestap is the head of the FBI Counterintelligence operation. He was FBI Agent Peter Strozk’s direct boss. If anyone in congress really wanted to know if the FBI paid for the Christopher Steele Dossier, Bill Priestap is the guy who would know.

In April 2016 Hillary Clinton and the DNC paid Glenn Simpson with Fusion-GPS to dig up dirt on Donald Trump.

April 19th 2016 Glenn Simpson’s wife, Mary Jacoby travels to the White House.

The wife of Glenn Simpson (Fusion GPS), Mary B. Jacoby, with years of Russia-angled reporting –including Donald Trumpvisits the White House in April 2016, at the same time as the DNC and Clinton hire Fusion GPS to conduct the opposition research on Donald Trump, surrounding Russia?  This timeline is entirely too obvious to be coincidental.

In May 2016 Fusion GPS hired Nellie Ohr, wife of DOJ Deputy Bruce Ohr, to lead the opposition research effort. That same month, Fusion GPS contracted with retired British MI6 Agent Christopher Steele to write the ‘Trump Russia Dossier’.

On May 5, 2016, (Via Katica) FBI lawyer Lisa Page (FBI Peter Strzok mistress) was in an important meeting at the White House. On the same day, WaPo had a ‘sources say’ story about the meeting. The subject was Hillary’s emails.

Yup, “small group” FBI Lawyer Lisa Page worked on the email case, too.  Here are the White House logs for the May 5th meeting:

The May 5th, 2016, meeting was after FBI Director James Comey initially drafted the exoneration letter and BEFORE James Comey met with President Obama on MAY 16th.

FBI Director James Comey met with President Obama on the morning of May 16, 2016 and by afternoon the draft letter was circulating to FBI leadership (not by Comey though).

In late June 2016 the first draft of the Steele Dossier was shared back with Fusion GPS and presumably Nellie Ohr was one of the recipients. According to Robby Mook, the partial dossier information was also given to the DNC and Clinton Campaign.

July 2nd, 2016 Hillary Clinton is interviewed by FBI investigator Peter Strzok. No transcripts or recordings of the interview are made.

July 5th, 2016, FBI Director James Comey exonerates Hillary Clinton.

In July 2016 candidate Donald Trump won the GOP nomination.  That same month the FBI Counterintelligence Division began an investigation they later described as a counterintelligence operation looking at Russian interference in the U.S. election. However, from 10 months of researched documentation, much of it in the MSM, we now know it was an FBI counterintelligence operation against candidate Donald Trump.

Also in July 2016, immediately following candidate Donald Trump’s successful bid to win the GOP nomination, a FISA application was denied. The timing here is far too coincidental (the later narrower version clearly evidences), the FISA application was to wiretap, monitor and conduct surveillance on candidate Trump and his campaign.

In August 2016, the lead FBI Agent in charge of that counterintelligence operation, Peter Strzok told his FBI Attorney and mistress: “I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office that there’s no way he gets elected – but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk. It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40.”

The “insurance policy” appears to be the ongoing counterintelligence operation that later utilized the Steele Dossier to get the FISA warrant and actually begin the wiretaps and surveillance. The conversation referenced between Strzok and Page took place in FBI Assistant Director Andrew “Andy” McCabe’s office.

All of this information is really just a recap. Everyone now sees this construct clearly. The Timelines are brutally obvious. Congress and DC investigators, including the years-long OIG investigation, are currently in the phase of nailing down the players and putting the final touches on the evidence. The outline is clear as day.

However, within this brutally obvious outline there’s a name missing. That name is the FBI Director of Counterintelligence Bill Priestap:

FBI Asst. Director in charge of Counterintelligence Bill Priestap was the immediate supervisor of FBI Counterintelligence Deputy Peter Strzok.

Bill Priestap is #1. Before getting demoted Peter Strzok was #2.

The investigation into candidate Donald Trump was a counterintelligence operation. That operation began in July 2016. Bill Priestap would have been in charge of that, along with all other, FBI counterintelligence operations.

FBI Deputy Peter Strzok was specifically in charge of the Trump counterintel op. However, Strzok would be reporting to Bill Priestap on every detail and couldn’t (according to structure anyway) make a move without Priestap approval.

On March 20th 2017 congressional testimony, James Comey was asked why the FBI Director did not inform congressional oversight about the counterintelligence operation that began in July 2016.

FBI Director Comey said he did not tell congressional oversight he was investigating presidential candidate Donald Trump because the Director of Counterintelligence suggested he not do so. *Very important detail.*

I cannot emphasize this enough. *VERY* important detail. Again, notice how Comey doesn’t use Priestap’s actual name, but refers to his position and title. Again, watch [Prompted]

FBI Director James Comey was caught entirely off guard by that first three minutes of that questioning. He simply didn’t anticipate it.

Oversight protocol requires the FBI Director to tell the congressional intelligence “Gang of Eight” of any counterintelligence operations. The Go8 has oversight into these ops at the highest level of classification. In July 2016 the time the operation began, oversight was the responsibility of this group, the Gang of Eight:

Obviously, based on what we have learned since March 2017, and what has surfaced recently, we can all see why the FBI would want to keep it hidden that they were running a counterintelligence operation against a presidential candidate. After all, as FBI Agent Peter Strzok said it in his text messages, it was an “insurance policy”.

REMINDER – FBI Agent Strzok to FBI Attorney Page:

“I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office that there’s no way he gets elected – but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk. It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40.”

So there we have FBI Director James Comey telling congress on March 20th, 2017, that the reason he didn’t inform the statutory oversight “Gang of Eight” was because Bill Priestap (Director of Counterintelligence) recommended he didn’t do it.

Apparently, according to Comey, Bill Priestap carries a great deal of influence if he could get his boss to NOT perform a statutory obligation simply by recommending he doesn’t do it.

Then again, Comey’s blame-casting there is really called creating a “fall guy”. FBI Director James Comey is ducking responsibility in March 2017 by blaming FBI Director of Counterintelligence Bill Priestap for not informing congress of the operation that began in July 2016. (9 months prior).

At that moment, that very specific moment during that March 20th hearing, anyone who watches these hearings closely could see Comey was creating his own exit from getting ensnared in the consequences from the wiretapping and surveillance operation of President Donald Trump. In essence, Bill Priestap is James Comey’s shield from liability.

But more curiously for current discussion, there has been NO MENTION of Bill Priestap in any of the recent revelations, despite his centrality to all of it.

Bill Priestap would have needed to authorize Peter Strzok to engage with Christopher Steele over the “Russian Dosssier”.

Bill Priestap would have needed to approve of the underlying documents that were used for both FISA applications (June/July and Sept/Oct).

Bill Priestap would be the person to approve of paying, or reimbursing, Christopher Steele for the Russian Dossier used in their counterintelligence operation and subsequent FISA application.

Without Bill Priestap involved, approvals, etc. the entire Russian/Trump Counterintelligence operation just doesn’t happen. Heck, James Comey’s March testimony in that regard is also evidence of Priestap’s importance.

In addition, when Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates testified (with James Clapper), she too spoke of the importance of Bill Priestap as her liaison and contact within the FBI on the counterintelligence operation. [Yates never mentioned Peter Strzok – not once.] Even though it was FBI agent Peter Strzok who interviewed Michael Flynn on January 24th, [link] Sally Yates never mentioned him. EVER.

However Deputy AG Sally Yates did talk about Bill Priestap during her testimony.

Yates testified she and Bill Priestap traveled together, Jan 26th, to the White House to inform Don McGahn (WH Counsel) of Michael Flynn “misleading statements” (based on Pence media reports and Flynn prior ambush interview Jan 24th).

According to Sally Yates testimony, she and Bill Priestap reportedly presented all the information to White House General Counsel Don McGahn “so the White House could take action that they deemed appropriate.”

So we all can see that Bill Priestap is a central figure. •FBI Director James Comey defers to him; •Acting Attorney General Sally Yates relied on him; •FBI Special Agent in Counterintelligence Peter Strzok reports to him.  Yet there’s absolutely no mention of Bill Priestap in any of the explosive investigative story-lines in the past two weeks.

Why?

Bill Priestap is the FBI Director of Counterintelligence. There’s no way he hasn’t been caught inside the investigative net.

Bill Priestap’s boss, Andrew McCabe has been caught. Bill Priestap’s subordinate, Peter Strzok, has most certainly been caught. And in March 20th 2017 FBI Director Comey pushed Priestap directly in front of the congressional oversight bus.

My hunch is either Bill Priestap is going to be the attempted fall-guy for the entire scheme. -OR- Bill Priestap saw the bus coming and is assisting the swamp-draining DC investigators:

On the home-front: FBI Director of Counterintelligence Bill Priestap is married to Sabina Menschel a self-employed “consultant” with a history of donations to Democrat candidates, specifically to Hillary Clinton.

Bill’s wife Sabina comes from a Goldman Sach’s connected family, which must be why Bill and Sabina can afford to live in a $3.2 million home in Washington DC.

Would be a little difficult to afford a $3,000,000.00 mortgage on a G-Man’s payroll.

Just sayin’…

BIG UGLY

.

RESOURCES:

IG Stimulated Releases of Information:

♦Release #1 was the FBI Agent Strzok and Attorney Lisa Page story; and the repercussions from discovering their politically motivated bias in the 2015/2016 Clinton email investigation and 2016/2017 Russian Election investigation.

♦Release #2 outlined the depth of FBI Agent Strzok and FBI Attorney Page’s specific history in the 2016 investigation into Hillary Clinton to include the changing of the wording [“grossly negligent” to “extremely careless”] of the probe outcome delivered by FBI Director James Comey.

♦Release #3 was the information about DOJ Deputy Bruce Ohr being in contact with Fusion GPS at the same time as the FISA application was submitted and granted by the FISA court; which authorized surveillance and wiretapping of candidate Donald Trump; that release also attached Bruce Ohr and Agent Strzok directly to the Steele Dossier.

♦Release #4 was information that Deputy Bruce Ohr’s wife, Nellie Ohr, was an actual contract employee of Fusion GPS, and was hired by F-GPS specifically to work on opposition research against candidate Donald Trump. Both Bruce Ohr and Nellie Ohr are attached to the origin of the Christopher Steele Russian Dossier.

♦Release #5 was the specific communication between FBI Agent Strzok and FBI Attorney Page. The 10,000 text messages that included evidence of them both meeting with Asst. FBI Director Andrew McCabe to discuss the “insurance policy” against candidate Donald Trump in August of 2016.

This entry was posted in Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Clinton(s), Conspiracy ?, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Desperately Seeking Hillary, Election 2016, FBI, media bias, Notorious Liars, President Trump, Professional Idiots, THE BIG UGLY, Uncategorized, White House Coverup. Bookmark the permalink.

286 Responses to A Counterintelligence Timeline With a Bill Priestap and James Comey Reminder…

  1. Joe S says:

    Quote from above:

    “The wife of Glenn Simpson (Fusion GPS), Mary B. Jacoby, with years of Russia-angled reporting –including Donald Trump– visits the White House in April 2016, at the same time as the DNC and Clinton hire Fusion GPS to conduct the opposition research on Donald Trump, surrounding Russia? This timeline is entirely too obvious to be coincidental.”

    This is completely believable to me. Remember when Robert Creamer (husband of Congresswoman Jan Schakowsky) was busted by James O’Keefe.

    It seems the Obama Whitehouse was the nexus of many smear and smut operations.

    Liked by 10 people

  2. recoverydotgod says:

    McCabe, Priestap and Rosenstein all spoke at the Cambridge Cyber Summit on October 4, 2017. They all seemed at ease when looking at a bit each of their videos.

    26:45-28:45 of the 2017 video with McCabe is eye-opening. His knowledge and ease of talking about how the FBI interacts with Muellers team is stunning to me. Just like it took him a long time to recuse himself from Hilary’s investigation (a week before the presidential election), it sure took him a long time to recuse himself (i.e. to resign in March) from any knowledge of what’s going on in the Mueller investigation. Without the IG investigation, nothing would have ever been known. Congress was used to not getting documentation out of the intelligence agencies they oversee.

    https://www.cnbc.com/cambridge-cyber-summit-agenda/
    https://www.cnbc.com/cambridge-cyber-summit-videos/?page=1

    Liked by 5 people

  3. jeans2nd says:

    Not that it means much, but according to the FBI, as of 21 Jun 2017 Priestap’s title was Assistant Director, Counterintelligence Division
    https://www.fbi.gov/news/testimony/assessing-russian-activities-and-intentions-in-recent-elections

    Like

    • jeans2nd says:

      When Robyn Gritz filed her lawsuit against the FBI, Andrew McCabe was Assistance Dir of Counterintelligence, the same position Bill Priestap currently holds.
      14 Dec 2017 11:14 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oDLxK6PswHY

      FBI-CIA were also exchanging agents during this time. Gritz never publicly names anyone other than McCabe in her lawsuit, but there was another guy assigned w/her, a GS-14. Gritz was a GS-15. Brennan was CIA head at this time. Gen Flynn, DIA head, was one of the guys who vouched for Gritz.

      Were Strzok or Ohr one of the ones exchanged at this time, or involved with the other GS-14 guy exchanged along w/Gritz, Strzok or Ohr would have had access to Brennan, along w/knowledge/possession of the Steele Dossier. Gritz states that there were guys who were def dirty, but so far Gritz has publicly named no one other than McCabe, due to her lawsuit.

      Going outside the chain-of-command is insubordination, and, if done more than once, would be reason for re-assignment at the least (so is obtaining classified matl w/o need-to-know). Personal experience – only once mind you, all it took was once (chain-of-command). Is extremely difficult to fire a gubmint employee. Gritz actually resigned, was not fired.

      How did Brennan obtain possession of the Steele Dossier? Brennan has admitted that he, Brennan, was in possession of the Steele Dossier in 2016 before DJT became the Repub candidate.

      Possibly Priestap was not in on this. Priestap could have been by-passed. A useful id10t.
      Or not.
      -.-

      Liked by 1 person

      • d2i says:

        Yes, how did Brennan obtain possession of the Steele Dossier? Kramer delivered McCain’s copy to Comey per McCain. Comey received additional copies from CounterIntel/Fusion GPS. So who provided a copy to Brennan who then sent it to the White House with ‘eyes only’ to Zero?

        Moreover, who were the ‘handpicked’ analysts who wrote the 17 then four then three intel agency report alleging Russian/Trump collusion. Were those handpicked analysts from FBI counterintel only or are there others embedded at CIA and even DNI?

        The spotlight is shining bright on DOJ/FBI only. Why is that when Brennan and Clapper, both being staunch defenders of the very bogus document that served as the foundation to this conspiracy, are the ones who dealt with the White House.

        This conspiracy isn’t or shouldn’t only be about the DOJ/FBI. Both Clapper and Brennan are up to their eyeballs in this dastardly scheme yet little sunlight has been shone on their duplicitous roles. Maybe Horowitz’s counterpart over at the CIA too is conducting an internal investigation. Maybe

        Liked by 2 people

        • prenanny says:

          Logic would argue that McCain did not simply pass it along like a hot tater: he made copies. Who did he share it with?
          Very good post d2
          Merry Christmas

          Like

    • DrNo76 says:

      Interesting that Preistap as of October this year is not the director of counterintelligence, but the assistant director. I’d like to know when and under what circumstance that demotion occurred. Also, if you watch the aspen cyber security conference video of the panel Preistap participated on in October of this year, one does not get the impression that he’s an individual at all hesitant over the entire muh Russia hacking for trump narrative. If he was turned or cooperating, I would not have expected to see him at that conference talking about the need for a government wide effort to hit back at Russian interference in the 2016 election. I have my doubts about Preistap being one of the white hats having cooperated with the IG to avaoid being thrown under the Comey bus.

      Like

      • BobInFL says:

        I have a tough time thinking of Preistap being a white hat in any scenario. He is obviously eye-ball deep in the planning, setup and coverup of this whole mess. Seeing what the seditious media has done with all of this, if he were going to be the fall guy I would expect them to have his name plastered all over the place while exonerating all of the other co-conspiritors. The higher up this goes, the closer it gets to jug-ears, and the media does not want any of that. But they haven’t mentioned him hardly at all. When they are quiet on something, that normally means that they are avoiding something they know will be very painful to their fellow travellers. My guess is that Preistap was caught red-handed and offered an opportunity to keep his neck out of a noose. My guess is he took the offer. We’ll see.

        Merry Christmas to Sundance, Katica, all of the wonderful folks who keep us all informed at CTH and to all my fellow treepers. And a happy and prosperous 2018 to you all. MAGA!

        Like

      • recoverydotgod says:

        There was no demotion.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FBI_Counterintelligence_Division

        The Counterintelligence Division is headed by an assistant director, who reports to the executive assistant director (EAD) of the FBI National Security Branch (NSB).

        Like

      • Alligator Gar says:

        FWIW, take a look at the Aspen Institute. Globaloney purveyors of all things communitarian and communist, they cloak their programs, including cyber security and global threats, in oh so reasonable jargon. Why is OUR government having anything to do with this outfit?
        http://www.aspeninstitute.org

        Like

    • Leadership
      The Counterterrorism Division is headed by an Assistant Director, who reports to the Executive Assistant Director of the FBI National Security Branch. RIGHT out of Wikipedia.. Prestrap WAS the head of this department..

      Liked by 1 person

  4. doc00 says:

    Besides the anti-Trump operation, there is absolutely no way Priestly, Clapper, Brennon and Eric Holder did not know about the on-going existence and operation of then Secretary Clinton’s server farm as well as the its use by POTUS Obama and EU-NATO allies. They also clearly knew those servers were used by NGO and foreign entities to hack the US Government and DNC. The wiping of those servers also take on added meaning as they were probably used to conduct anti-Trump communications with foreign governments. Anything associated with those servers is still vital to nailing a legal case as it is the missing direct evidence.

    Liked by 5 people

    • However, I 1/2 years ago the FBI and DOJ were not smart enough to seize the DNC Server when this all started to develop; OR was that all part of the plan in the first place NOT TO SEIZE THE SERVER to allow the INSURRECTION to continue on to this day !

      Like

      • farrier105 says:

        Crowdstrike did nothing for about 36 days except watch the data flow out of the DNC network–that is ALL the computers, not just one little server. This is not Best Practices in what is called “Incident Response,” which calls for immediate containment of a hack.

        Like

  5. youme says:

    FBI has very strict rules on paying or utilizing informants. Any payments that the FBI made to any informant is documented. Each informant is vetted via a criminal background check and approved by a supervisor and an ASAC. A file number is assigned. Periodic reviews of each and every informant are every 90 days. Every single contact whether by phone or in person must be documented, Every payment to an informant is witnessed by 2 agents and documented along with a fiscal control number. It is extremely rare that any informant payments or informant contacts are made at the executive level.

    These Congressional committees must have subpoenaed this information and the IG certainly reviewed this issue. No one knows?

    I think what could have occurred is that these procedures were not followed and FusionGPS was treated as a “vendor”, an entity that provides services to the FBI such a cleaning firm or office painter.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Alligator Gar says:

      If it was a procurement, there will be a trail. If it was paid by p.o., maybe not. But if there was so much going and coming b/w FBI & CIA, is it inconceivable that black ops $$$ was shuffled between agencies as well–laundered, so to speak, and used for the GPS payola?

      Like

  6. Donna in Oregon says:

    I don’t think that any of them have “cracked”. By claiming this is a counterintelligence operation they seek anonymity and most likely they will get it. The proof is right here in Priestap’s explanation before the committee. All tied up with a bow.

    However, the one mistake to the counterintelligence operation is the sale of uranium to Russia. That should be the focus. Everything else will fall by the wayside except for Uranium One. Priestap is working with Mueller, that is why he is persona non grata.

    STATEMENT OF
    BILL PRIESTAP
    ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
    COUNTERINTELLIGENCE DIVISION
    FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
    BEFORE THE
    COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY
    UNITED STATES SENATE
    FOR A HEARING ENTITLED
    “OVERSIGHT OF THE FOREIGN AGENTS REGISTRATION ACT AND
    ATTEMPTS TO INFLUENCE U.S. ELECTIONS: LESSONS LEARNED
    FROM CURRENT AND PRIOR ADMINISTRATIONS”
    PRESENTED
    JULY 26, 2017

    https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/07-26-17%20Priestap%20Testimony.pdf

    Liked by 1 person

  7. JohnnyII says:

    Follow the wives, follow the wives. . . . Now I begin to wonder about the wives of our representatives in WaDC. Primarily the wives of senators but also the wives of long term reps in the house. Where do they work? Who hired them and why?

    Liked by 2 people

    • Donna in Oregon says:

      The wives are just rubes. Bill Clinton has been pimping Hillary since he left office. He went to Kazakhstan in 2008 to begin setting up the sale of Uranium. No one vacations in , Kazakhstan. Who goes there? Come on….Clinton is more the Lolita private island type of vacationer. This scheme is long, and protracted. But it is a scheme, nonetheless.

      Hillary is just his stooge. Bill is the one with the brains and the contacts. Always was, always will be. When he’s gone, she is toast.

      Same is true for the rest of the wives. Accessories, but never the ‘outfit’.

      Like

      • Q&A says:

        These wives don’t appear to be rubes. The wives act as an underground conduit to getting sensitive things done under the radar of scrutiny. They also can connect with non-government contacts more easily. I agree that the wives are likely not the initiators of the schemes, but they perform integral functions, just like in most spy networks.

        Liked by 1 person

        • LCSmom says:

          Yes. And that looks like where the pay-offs happen too. Job promotions, large donations to bogus campaigns, who knows what else.

          Like

        • Donna in Oregon says:

          rube
          Idoit, mark, stupid, person who is easily fooled, target of con or scam
          So who is the rube for our new scam?
          #idiot#mark#stupid#dumbass#gullable#target

          Yes, they can go to prison and have all of their worldly goods taken by asset forfeiture laws. So how smart is that? Not very…..

          They are rubes. Marks, idiots.

          Like

          • farrier105 says:

            In the world of “Bureaucrat Land,” the wives of the big shots in an agency are “Ladies of the Manor,” while the common bureaucrats are serfs. Don’t worry, the wives are always told by the husbands what is going on, and they lend a hand and give advice from time-to-time. They get involved in more of daily operations than people think.

            Like

  8. D. Manny says:

    Were FBI agents personally funding the Steele dossier?

    March of 2016 marks the “Negotiation Phase” of the Russian collusion hoax.
    2016-03-01 Fusion GPS approaches Perkins Coie to offer research it had conducted on Trump.

    It appears that Fusion GPS’s pitch to Perkins Coie was successful, because it’s at this point that the funding for the dossier begins as follows:
    2016-04-07 Hillary for America PAC begins to make increased payments to Perkins Coie.
    2016-04-19 The DNC begins to make unusual payments to Perkins Coie.
    2016-04-25 Obama for America PAC begins to make payments to Perkins Coie.
    ————————————————————————
    Now, here’s where it gets interesting. I’ll bet you anything that Hillary for America PAC put out a fundraising letter at this point, and take a look at what fish they netted…..

    2016-03-03 FBI Agent Bill Preistap’s wife, Sabina Menshel, donates to Hillary for America PAC.

    Like

  9. Deplorable_Vespucciland says:

    Song for those who oppose MAGA.
    “Man in the Mirror ~ If you want the world to be a better place
    you better look in the mirror and make a change!”

    Live concert. Romania in 1992 shortly after the fall of the Iron Curtain.
    (Michael Jackson, taken out by DeepState 5 months after Obama took over.)

    Like

  10. CountryclassVulgarian says:

    I find this whole sordid affair extremely frightening. Because none of these people, not a single one of them is going to jail. Andrew Mc Cabe will “retire” in March with full pension, Bruce Ohr, Peter Strzok and Lisa Page are all still collecting paychecks. There are indeed two Americas. They the ruling class and us the country class. We dared to think we had a choice as to who would be our President.

    Liked by 1 person

    • D. Manny says:

      “I think it’s appropriate that we wait in this instance until we have all the facts — until the last witness . . . has been interviewed, and then, based on the facts that we have, take appropriate action,” Wray said.

      https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2017/12/12/politics/peter-strzok-texts-released/index.html?__twitter_impression=true

      Like

    • Howie says:

      Trump is going to take their stakes even if they do not go to jail.

      Like

    • singingsoul says:

      CountryclassVulgarian says:
      “I find this whole sordid affair extremely frightening. Because none of these people, not a single one of them is going to jail. Andrew Mc Cabe will “retire” in March with full pension, Bruce Ohr, Peter Strzok and Lisa Page are all still collecting paychecks. There are indeed two Americas. They the ruling class and us the country class. We dared to think we had a choice as to who would be our President.”
      ___________________________________________
      These people are an example what the former DDR looked like and USSR and Nazi Germany.
      In any totalitarian system you have two or parallel unequal justice one for the in contrail and the worker bees.
      For the sake of our Republic these people need to be rooted out otherwise we are always with one foot in a totalitarian system or one voting period.
      We allowed people into this country that do not understand the Constitution or our Republic who are willing to choose totalitarian system over freedom because of promised free stuff .
      We keep seeing who Central America or Mexico choose their leaders.
      Muslims are happy with totalitarian system as long as Sharia is the law of the land.
      WE need to fight in the poles with our votes to keep the majority in both houses and keep Trump for 8 years. The evil cabal is not exterminated not rooted out.
      Merry Christmas to All of you !

      Like

  11. Donna in Oregon says:

    For the love of Mike. Come on, here it is in a nutshell. Easy peasey…

    “As a result, where once the FBI’s counterintelligence efforts primarily focused on
    countering the activities of hostile intelligence services, current FBI counterintelligence efforts
    encompass everything from combating economic espionage and proliferation to conducting
    supply chain risk management and identifying foreign investment that may pose a risk to our
    national security. Although these activities are disparate, they share one central idea: our
    adversaries want to obtain our country’s most valuable assets, so we need to protect those assets.”

    Statement of Bill Priestap
    Assistant Director
    Counterintelligence Division
    FBI
    JULY 26, 2017
    https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/07-26-17%20Priestap%20Testimony.pdf

    Priestap is most likely working with Mueller on their Big, Huge, Muh Russia investigation.
    Which is why no one in the Trump admin will touch him. Hillary’s server was part of the counterintelligence. Get it? Except she erased everything…so no evidence for or against that “strategy”.

    Which is why no one is being fired. They all have plausible deniability….”well, I was just being a good American, blah blah blah”

    Even put in the “economic” twist, so Hillary and Bill won’t look like Uranium prostitutes.

    Americans are being played. Again. If we don’t get on them like stink on poop we will lose. Ride Uranium One like Seabiscuit….to the finish line. The money is the key to all their jail cells.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Donna in Oregon says:

      P.S. They would tell us what they did but it’s super secret still…..Snort. Lock them up before the suicides begin. It’s a huge cabal, just start with one and work your way every which way because the entire Obama admin is the target. Get to it!

      Like

    • Deplorable_Vespucciland says:

      Old Killary’s homebrew server was a way to circumvent the law and hide all her under the table transactions as Secretary of State. After Trump won the election he gracefully said that he would not pursue her prosecution. Instead of walking away quietly she ramped up her attacks on him and promoted the appointment of a Special Counsel to investigate HIM. She had her chance to safely retire into her sunset years. She chose not to; and now she will bring down the whole Democrat DeepState house of cards with her.

      M A G A

      Liked by 2 people

    • Agreed; but WHO will be the Jockey to ride Uranium One to the Finish Line !?

      Like

  12. tampafan says:

    Sundance is a fun Twitter follow, as is @GOPPollAnalyst. Her research is often incorporated in Sundance’s timelines and posts.

    Like

  13. LCSmom says:

    So the laywers for the FBI, DOJ, NSC, NSA, Defense, Homeland security, State Department, and Commerce all got together with Obama to help figure out what to do about Hillary’s email problem.

    Looks like all of those agencies got their marching orders and were in on the cover-up.

    The whole place is just rotten.

    Liked by 3 people

  14. More of the same nothing coming from Trey Gowdy.

    What does “it just happens to be accurate” even mean? What’s accurate? Again, no one will be held accountable with Gowdy on the case, he too is deep swamp state.

    Like

  15. trapper says:

    That May 5 meeting about Hillary’s emails was all lawyers. The meeting consisted of the top lawyers for the FBI and NSA and the departments of State, Defense, Homeland Security, Justice, and Commerce. Commerce? What in the world? Commerce would only make sense if the subject of the meeting was focused on Trump, since he was the only businessman.

    Hillary’s campaign ran the hiring of Fusion GPS, and thus the smear, through her outside lawyers who may not have known what was up. Perhaps the Hillary emails was just cover for a meeting that was really about something very different: the smear. And perhaps the idea was the same: run the smear through lawyers, some of whom may not have known exactly what was afoot. As early as May 5 now.

    The Clintons have always been masters of the red herring. Think travelgate. Now, here’s a thought: was the entire Hillary email issue just a dodge, a head fake, a red herring? “Look, a squirrel,” to keep attention away from the inner workings of setting up the smear?

    Like

    • Donna in Oregon says:

      Ah but Hillary and Bill just had to have money. That’s where the “counterintelligence” BS falls apart. This group of un-American lechers is rife with the 7 Deadly Sins. Dirty, filthy sinners…

      Let’s call them…… Irredeemables.

      The Clinton’s and the Obama admin.treated American National Security secrets like an ATM. There is nowhere to hide their ill-gotten gains/cashes of currency. The Trump admin financial ‘killers’ will find it all.

      Even if Obama hid uranium up his wazoo as payment, someone in the Treasury dept will find it. Guaranteed 🙂

      Like

      • Sevenwheel says:

        I’ll bet the main conduit was the CFPB. It was created by the Obama administration, so it was fully staffed by the previous administration. It was designed and intended to be unaccountable to future administrations, and as soon as Trump swatted that protection away he appointed none other than Mick Mulvaney, the OMB director, as the acting director. Mulvaney, on the first day of the job, tweets a picture of himself going through what appears to be a briefing book of financial records. The message could hardly have been louder.

        Like

  16. Am I the only one who wonders about the timing of the movie release of The Post, the movie that in its trailers claim it is about “the greatest coverup in history”. Is this just setting the stage to minimize the greater coverup that seems to be unfolding today?

    Liked by 1 person

    • Sylvia Avery says:

      No. In fact, they are quite open about it. It is a Steven Spielberg movie (remember when they were “must see”) and I read an interview with him about this movie. He was busy with other projects, but this was handed to him and when he read it he knew he HAD to do it.

      You see, Steven, unlike many others, claims that he ventures out from his blue bubble and visits family and friends. He finds that at dinner time he must simply keep his head down and his mouth shut, and he is frightened. FRIGHTENED by the talk he hears at the tables of family and friends in red America. So he knew he just had to do this movie.

      He made this movie, with the gleeful assistance of Meryl Streep and Tom Hanks, to show red America how wrong we are. To lecture us. To propagandize. I hope it flops so big it is the next Heaven’s Gate.

      Liked by 1 person

      • nimrodman says:

        “He made this movie … to show red America how wrong we are. To lecture us. To propagandize.

        You forgot scold

        Leftists are nothing if not finger-wagging, undeservedly-self-superior scolds.
        “that’s Racist”
        “that’s Sexist”
        “you’re all Deplorables”
        “so dumb they vote against their own interests”

        (that last one is my favorite; they presume from their self-annointed lofty moral perch to “know” what’s in our best interest and not)

        Hubris.

        Liked by 2 people

      • nimrodman says:

        “I hope it flops so big it is the next Heaven’s Gate.”

        Well, he’s certainly cutting the potential audience for this film in half.

        Factor in recent lower attendance for films as a result of newer media fixations among youth, and potential attendance is likely down to about a quarter of what it would have been in the days of unquestioned Leftist media supremacy.

        Liked by 1 person

  17. Paco Loco says:

    Of course it’s a propaganda film. No doubt it will bomb just like everything coming out of Hollyweird. Americans have lost interest in this crap.

    Liked by 1 person

  18. recoverydotgod says:

    The WaPo reporter that wrote the “sources say” May 5, 2016 article uses his own reporting as proof to say in September 2017 that the FBI and the public were aware that the Hillary probe was “trending” toward no charges.

    Liked by 1 person

  19. jeans2nd says:

    Cannot find my earlier comment. This goes with it.
    “Yates testified she and Bill Priestap traveled together, Jan 26th, to the White House to inform Don McGahn (WH Counsel)”

    That is not what Yates said.
    Yates testimony above, 00:27 – “I took a senior member of the National Security Division…”

    National Security Division is DOJ. https://www.justice.gov/jmd/organization-mission-and-functions-manual-national-security-division

    FBI is National Security Branch, and consists of five sections, Counterintelligence, Terrorism, High-Value Detainee Interrogation Group, Terrorist Screening Center, and WMD. https://www.fbi.gov/about/leadership-and-structure/national-security-branch
    Which is prob why Priestap is an Asst Dir, not a Dir.
    Boy is Yates’ voice irritating.

    Liked by 1 person

    • jeans2nd says:

      O/T, but related – The DOJ OSC may be the one prosecuting results from a DOJ IG case. DOJ OSC protects whistleblowers, among other things.
      https://osc.gov/Pages/WhatWeDo.aspx

      AG Jeff may be spared the injustice of his recusal. One suspects AG Jeff already knew that.

      “OSC does not have independent investigative authority in these cases. However, Congress has given OSC an important oversight role in reviewing government investigations of potential misconduct.”
      https://osc.gov/Pages/DOW.aspx

      The new guy, Henry Kerner, is President Trump’s appointee to serve as special counsel. Kerner is a veteran prosecutor and congressional investigator, who was sworn in on Oct. 30. http://www.govexec.com/oversight/2017/12/newly-installed-special-counsel-wants-adjudicate-cases-more-swiftly/144431/
      30 Oct 2017. The new guy has a wee bit of catching up to do.

      OSC has been instrumental in reforming the VA, based on whistleblower complaints. Twitter https://twitter.com/us_osc DOJ OSC also prosecutes retaliation against whistleblowers. https://osc.gov/Pages/News.aspx

      There was a rash of programs on whistleblower and retaliation options on Fed Radio after Pres Trump took office, that included both attorneys and gubmint people explaining the law. Apparently the last 5-6 years, especially the last 2 years, have been particularly hard on the lower-level Fed employees. These guys were really really frightened. The FedTalk programs were to reassure the gubmint employees, and transparency has been been emphasized by every Trump appointee whom we checked.

      No doubt AG Jeff has a monumental task on his hands. Lord love ‘im, AG Jeff took this on, knowing full well what awaited him.
      Merry Christmas y’all. We”re out.

      Liked by 1 person

      • jeans2nd says:

        Oh ya, one last thing (isn’t there always one last thing?) – Comey – what if “…usually our head of the counterintelligence division” wasn’t this time? “Usually.” Or, what if Priestap was merely following orders? McCabe was Priestap’s boss. Insubordination/not following chain-of-command is reason for firing (or a good dressing down by your Cap’n, your 1st Louie, and your 1st Sgt ;-)). Priestap may have married into $$$, but a guy has his pride after all, and those mortgage payments no doubt are fairly hefty.

        Like

      • William F Buckley's Ghost says:

        The OSC is useless. No criminal investigative authority much less criminal prosecution! There’s nobody at the OSC with a badge!

        Like

  20. mashall says:

    Louis Joseph Freeh FBI Director/Waco Mass Murder
    BILL CLINTON’S ATTORNEY
    The Texas Rangers
    The relationship between the Texas Rangers and the Branch Davidians is another instance of the rightward politicization of the Davidian tragedy. The Rangers are a law enforcement branch of the Texas Department of Public Safety that was originally formed to protect the white settlers of the Republic of Texas against the Indians. As a law enforcement agency, it would be consistent for the Rangers to be aligned with the BAFT and FBI regarding the Branch Davidians. However, the Rangers’ investigation of the Davidian tragedy has been largely suppressed. This suppression indicates a split between the allegiances of these law enforcement agencies.

    The Rangers had within their jurisdiction the crimes committed in Waco, and were prepared to conduct an autonomous investigation into the deaths of the Davidians and of the BATF agents killed in the February raid. However, the U.S. attorney’s office deputized the Rangers as U.S. Marshals for the purpose of that investigation. This deputization theoretically increased the Rangers’ power, since it gave them a national entitlement and corresponding access to the resources of the national powers such as the FBI laboratories. In practice, however, it neutralized the effectiveness of the Rangers’ “autonomous” investigation by making the evidence collected in that investigation and the results from it FBI property. Evidence was collected by the Rangers was sent to FBI crime labs and never returned. Interviews of over sixty FBI and BATF agents were conducted by Rangers in the course of their investigation, but more than fifty of those interviews remain “classified” and unavailable to the public. It is difficult to review these facts without wondering what purpose the FBI was serving by deputizing the Rangers, if not to ensure the censure of the Rangers’ investigation.

    Like

    • mashall says:

      Louis Freeh/FBI Director for Bill Clinton

      Like

      • mashall says:

        In the course of the assault, the church building caught on fire in circumstances that are still disputed. Barricaded inside the building, 80 Branch Davidians, including David Koresh, perished in the ensuing blaze; 22 of these victims were children under the age of 17.[

        Bill Clinton’s FBI Director Louis Freeh

        Like

  21. phoenixRising says:

    Sundance, George Webb believes Priestap “buried” the Huma emails…

    Also, Webb is weighing theory that “Peter Strzok” is a dropbox between HRC, Priestap, McCabe and 2/3 others

    Like

  22. brh82 says:

    This is a repeat but one I surely want to have entered into the record. I have sent it to the White House but I am never sure what i send goes anywhere but in the HUGE round trash bin:
    http://themillenniumreport.com/2017/03/james-brien-comey-how-did-the-fbi-director-make-1-on-americas-most-wanted-list/

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s