Currently leading by 5 points in both Nevada and Arizona, President Donald Trump is on pace to win every battleground state in the 2024 election.

The states of Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Michigan, previously labeled the “blue wall,” have been called for President Trump.  These three states are where James Clyburn spent most of his time on the ballot initiatives.  However, most of the critical regional ¹ballot printing operations were defeated.

Last night, President Trump secured Georgia and North Carolina.  President Trump is on pace to have shattered every battleground state result and achieve 312 electoral votes.  A resounding victory.

[Interactive Map Here]

(Via Politico) – Donald Trump won Michigan, once again turning the state red just four years after his defeat in 2020.

Both candidates spent a number of their final days in the Great Lakes State as polls projected a race hanging on a knife’s edge. Both Trump and Kamala Harris emphasized manufacturing and the economy in their visits, addressing voters’ worries about lingering post-pandemic inflation — a chief concern that bolstered the former president’s appeal.

(more…)

There is a video segment going viral from CNN that deserves some special attention. Within the video CNN’s Jake Tapper asks CNN election guru John King to show where Kamala is doing better than Joe Biden. The result catches Tapper by surprise.

However, there’s a big underpinning reality behind this.

Kamala Harris did not “underperform” Joe Biden, what the data actually shows is the missing fraudulent ballots from the 2020 election. WATCH:

All of the counties where Kamala did better than Joe Biden pic.twitter.com/nd4d4kXQ4B

— Anthony (@Catholicizm1) November 6, 2024

.

Now that we know the basic 2024 raw vote total, we are able to put a scale on the number of fraudulent mail-in ballots from the 2020 election.

Based on 2024 vote/ballot data, 18 million ballots are missing when compared to 2020.

In 2024 there are 18 million fewer votes. That’s the approximate scale of ballot fraud from 2020. (see graphic below)

(more…)

This is not a “one-off” I tried myself using Google.com and the search result is indeed being manipulated.

When the user uses Google to search for: “where can I vote for Trump” -vs- “where can I vote for Harris” the Google result is entirely different.

When searching the Harris option, the Google search algorithm tells you exactly where you can vote.  When using the Trump option, the result is generic.

This is blatant big tech manipulation by an ideological ally of Democrats. However, it should not come as a surprise.

Below is the reminder of what Google executives promised they would do to manipulate future elections after the 2016 result.

(more…)

On January 17, 2017, just three days before President-Trump was sworn into office, outgoing President Obama had a secret conference call with progressive media allies.

A long battled FOIA request by Jason Leopold was finally able to receive documents and within the documents the transcript of the phone call is revealed. [Documents Here]

Again, this is three days before Trump took office, when the Obama White House and Intelligence Community were intentionally pushing the Trump-Russia conspiracy story into the media in an effort to disrupt President Trump’s transition to power.  President Obama is essentially asking his progressive allies to help defend his administration. Part of the 20-page transcript is below: 

Barack Obama – […] “I think the Russia thing is a problem. And it’s of a piece with this broader lack of transparency. It is hard to know what conversations the President-elect may be having offline with business leaders in other countries who are also connected to leaders of other countries. And I’m not saying there’s anything I know for a fact or can prove, but it does mean that — here’s the one thing you guys have been able to know unequivocally during the last eight years, and that is that whether you disagree with me on policy or not, there was never a time in which my relationship with a foreign entity might shade how I viewed an issue. And that’s — I don’t know a precedent for that exactly.

Now, the good news there, I will say, is just that there’s a lot of career folks here who care about that stuff, and not just in the intelligence agencies. I think in our military, in our State Department. And I think that to the extent that things start getting weird, I think you will see surfacing objections, some through whistleblowers and some through others. And so I think there is some policing mechanism there, but that’s unprecedented.

And then the final thing that I’m most worried about is just preserving the democratic process so that in two years, four years, six years, if people are dissatisfied, that dissatisfaction expresses itself. So Jeff Sessions and the Justice Department and what’s happening with the voting rights division and the civil rights division, and — those basic process issues that allow for the democratic process to work. I’d include in that, by the way, press. I think you guys are all on top of how disconcerting — you guys complain about us — (laughter) — but let me just tell you, I think — we actually respected you guys and cared about trying to explain ourselves to you in a way that I think is just going to be different.

On balance, that leads to me to say I think that four years is okay. Take on some water, but we can kind of bail fast enough to be okay. Eight years would be a problem. I would be concerned about a sustained period in which some of these norms have broken down and started to corrode.

Q Could you talk a bit more about the Russia thing? Because it sounds like you, who knows more than we do from what you’ve seen, and is genuinely —

(more…)

Despite Donald Trump’s campaign managers in 2016 and 2024 being women, and despite many of the top executives in the Trump organization being women, and despite most of the spokespeople for President Trump being women, Kamala Harris campaign surrogate Mark Cuban said yesterday, “you never see him around strong, intelligent women. Ever. It’s just that simple. They’re intimidating to him. He doesn’t like to be challenged by them.”

This set off a firestorm of pushback against the insufferable sexist Mark Cuban, a billionaire who spews hatred and vitriolic nonsense on an almost daily basis.  “More of the same condescending rhetoric from Harris allies,” said Sen. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa. “This strong, intelligent woman voted for Donald J. Trump — and I’ve been proud to be on the road across this great country with @TeamTrump!”

“Trying to think of a response to sissy man @mcuban but I’m too dumb and weak to do so,” quipped conservative columnist Julie Kelly. “Just when you think the Kamala camp can’t possibly alienate and divide people any more than they already have, now they attack women who support Trump. Nice job, Mark,” added Republican National Committee co-chair Lara Trump. Wyoming congressional representative Harriet Hageman had this video response:

I am traveling across Wyoming but had to pull over to respond to Mark Cuban’s weak and unintelligent remarks about women who support Trump. pic.twitter.com/xVmU2ha4BX

— Harriet Hageman (@HagemanforWY) October 31, 2024

.

(more…)

I’m going to skip most of the nonsense about the “Raskin Letter” [SEE HERE] to focus on the part that few will notice or report.

The process that Jamie Raskin is angry about, is a transition process that was created by Barack Obama and his GSA administrative state allies, to control all aspects of an incoming administration in opposition to the system that Obama created.  This was the reinforcement cement in the “fundamental change” pillar.

The “transition process” that Raskin talks about was created in 2010.  The only presidential transitions that have taken place since then were Trump in ’16 and Biden in ’20.  That’s it.  This is not a historically used process.  In fact, Barack Obama never used it in 2009 when he came into office, because it never existed.

President Trump’s planned 2025 transition team are simply refusing to repeat the mistakes of the 2017 transition process that ended up with the GSA willfully impeding the peaceful transition of power, by targeting the incoming administration.  Lastly, notice the pesky IC term in the 3rd paragraph, “continuity” – as in the continuity of leftist government.

[SOURCE pdf]

(Via NBC) – The top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, Rep. Jamie Raskin, is sounding the alarm over former President Donald Trump’s failure to enter into key agreements with the Biden administration for the presidential transition process, warning that it could endanger the peaceful transfer of power and threaten U.S. national security.

(more…)

Speaking to a CNN Townhall, Kamala Harris was asked to describe her weakness.  She replied:

“I may not have the answer as soon as you ask it about a specific policy sometimes because I’m gonna wanna research it; I’m going to wanna study it, I’m kind of a nerd sometimes ha ha ha ha ha! I confess!”

WATCH:

Kamala Harris: “I may not have the answer as soon as you ask it about a specific policy sometimes because I’m gonna want to research it…I’m kind of a nerd sometimes ha ha ha ha ha! I confess!” pic.twitter.com/Rsa7zRQJvn

— Townhall.com (@townhallcom) October 24, 2024

.

One very upset person responded via social media with an extremely salty explosion.

(more…)

The FCC is investigating CBS for blatant manipulation of news. [SEE COMPLAINT HERE] CBS really has no defense.

CBS has been caught producing, via editorial manipulation, two entirely different responses to the same question.

Everyone has been asking CBS to just simply release the full transcript.  CBS has refused.  The assumption is now about the manipulative content of the broadcast being so extreme that to release a transcript would be even worse than what is already known.  The FCC complaint is simple and accurate, which is likely why CBS has never attempted to defend itself, until today.

CBS – Former President Donald Trump is accusing 60 Minutes of deceitful editing of our Oct. 7 interview with Vice President Kamala Harris. That is false.

60 Minutes gave an excerpt of our interview to Face the Nation that used a longer section of her answer than that on 60 Minutes. Same question. Same answer. But a different portion of the response. When we edit any interview, whether a politician, an athlete, or movie star, we strive to be clear, accurate and on point. The portion of her answer on 60 Minutes was more succinct, which allows time for other subjects in a wide ranging 21-minute-long segment. (Statement Link)

It is likely CBS will, eventually, release the full transcript. However, not until after the election. It is remarkable how CBS is willing to destroy any semblance of brand image that may have been left; but that position is merely just a reflection of our 2024 political situation.

(more…)

It should not come as a surprise given the volume of examples that have been presented in the last several years; however, according to Gallup polling, amid all the top national civic and political institutions the United States “news media” is now the least trusted institution of all.

[Citation]

The alarming statistic is really that -post COVID- 31% of Americans still trusts news media.  I would surmise that if a similar poll was done on professions, teachers, nurses and healthcare workers would also be at the lower end of the scale.

That said, this really is not a surprise if you have ever interacted at a high level outside the USA.  Internationally, thanks in part to the traveling USA press corps who have showcased their ideological attributes to a host of foreign audiences, the entire world now view the USA media apparatus as various shades of something akin to Baghdad Bob.

If you think that a cognitively compromised USA President parading around the world as a blithering fool, while the USA media openly pretended he was functional, does not have some significant impact on global views, you are mistaken.  The entire world sees Joe Biden as he is, not as the media pretended him to be.

(more…)

Mark Halprin gives his prediction about what will happen when President Trump wins the election.  Tucker Carlson plays along, with both pretending not to remember what happened in 2016.

What Mark Halprin predicts, is exactly what happened in 2016.  WATCH:

Every single thing in this response is exactly what happened in 2016.  The silly part is both Tucker Carlson and Mark Halprin pretending not to remember what happened.  Some reminder pictures from 2016 below.

In 2016 the Democrats: ~ organized a refusal to certify the election ~ boycotted the inauguration ~ claimed Russia hacked the election ~ broke out in violent protests, including arson, on inauguration day ~ put their genitals on their heads ~ conducted violent protests ~ began the Trump-Russia campaign for the next two years; then tried impeachments.

(more…)