CTH readers are several years ahead of the current news cycle, and I doubt any of the recent revelations about USAID spending and objectives are surprising to most readers here. What we are now seeing are the receipts proving a conversation we have outlined exhaustively on these pages.
There are many ‘revelations’ certain to surface, including how the USAID priorities included the control of information on the internet through their partnerships in the private sector. The larger objective was always information control and manipulating political outcomes both domestically and abroad. That is the impetus for the USAID spending.
The ‘humanitarian’ angle was always a cover, a ruse, tradecraft to hide how taxpayer money was gained and being distributed. That’s why none of their humanitarian endeavors ever solved anything.
Food, clean water, medicine and global aid was the visible claim by the USAID administrators; however, as you see from the surfacing receipts, that was always just a cover for their activity in political influence operations.
Do not think the United States Senate Committee on Foreign Relations was blind to this USAID operation, they were not. The Senate held oversight, and they knew exactly what was going on, who was doing the orchestration of the agenda, and what the priorities of the USAID operation was all about.
Senator Marco Rubio sat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Secretary of State Marco Rubio advanced with a confirmation vote of 99-0. Secretary Rubio now controls USAID.
To understand the issues as they are now surfacing it is very important to retain clear context.
USAID was a sub-silo, a child of the parent organization, the CIA. The CIA controlled the Big Picture, and USAID was the institution to carry out the objective.
When you see a controversial issue within the USAID operation reaching sunlight, always remember it is the CIA behind it. When USAID targeted a foreign government for removal, it was the CIA behind it. When USAID engaged with domestic and foreign media to control mis-dis-malinformation, it is the CIA behind it. The CIA is defining the information.
When USAID pressured various global news agencies and organized advertiser boycotts against information sources averse to the interests of USAID, it is the CIA behind it. When USAID funds the Clinton Foundation, or McCain Institute, or any of the cause celebre’ NGOs you now see in the headlines, it is factually the CIA behind them. When USAID funds media for influence control, it is the CIA behind it.
This is also the context for the envelopes at the George H.W. Bush funeral. An argument can be made that GHW Bush as CIA Director was the originator and architect of the CIA/USAID business model we are now discussing. Bush knew the politicians would have to benefit from the business, in order to advance the operation.
When Chuck Schumer says, “the Intelligence Community has “six ways from Sunday to get you,” he is referencing this matrix of Intelligence Community control, that also includes the use of USAID to fund the systems that target the opposition as defined by the CIA.
Yes, in many ways real and yet to be revealed, all roads lead to Langley.
When you see media outlets, or NGOs on the left and right side of the information system being given funds (directly or indirectly) though the USAID funding silo, keep in mind this it is essentially the CIA behind it.
The Central Intelligence Agency is the only silo within Washington DC, specifically empowered to operate in complete darkness. There is zero CIA oversight, and the mission mandate as authorized by congress permits the CIA to remain entirely closed from any oversight or scrutiny. The CIA is also authorized to lie about anything as part of their “national security” mission.
It is through that larger IC prism that all information about USAID operations should be evaluated.
This is also the context to remember and perhaps reevaluate the attack on the ‘secret’ U.S. embassy consulate in Benghazi Libya (9/11/12). This is the context that explains why it took the FBI 19 days to arrive in Benghazi and why the U.S. government allowed the CIA operatives in the Annex a few miles away to remain under attack without aid. If an event threatens to reveal the IC, CIA, State Dept activity, they throw a bag over it – sacrificing anyone in/around the event.
Many years ago, when we began our discussion on this matrix of domestic manipulations and political outcomes, we presented an image.
This was not an accidental meme.
Evaluate it closely.

The National Security Act of 1947.
Essentially this act allowed the CIA to become unaccountable to the American public. As long as the issue was “national security,” those were the “magic words,” that allows the CIA and any party of the IC to be completely unaccountable.
In addition, since the CIA is an executive department and thus under the purview of the President, nothing they do is without input from the President. That means ALL Presidents have essentially signed off on everything the CIA has done since 1947.
So given this, where does Donald Trump fit in?
I recommend the repeal of the 1947 National Security Act.
Until it is repealed, the CIA doesn’t have to let Americans know ANYTHING that they are doing and that is totally legal.
Here is one historian’s exploration of the CIA and the American public:
https://franciscogilwhite.substack.com/p/the-national-security-act-of-1947-destroyed-us-democracy
“Oh Wow.” – Corporate Investment Agency
Luna: Project Mockingbird was a CIA op during the cold war
https://rumble.com/v6hnwwg-anna-paulina-luna-acknowledges-that-elon-musks-life-is-probably-in-danger.html
Some would. But the “moderate, nice, decent” suburban swing voters would protest because they don’t like the bickering.
“For those of you who don’t know me and haven’t followed what’s happened to me over the last 10 years since I’ve been AG…
“Before I was Attorney General of Texas I had never even had a speeding ticket or a parking ticket. I’d never been in trouble in my life.
“I become AG, first I get debanked by four different banks, then I get indicted, I get sued by the SEC. They tried to take away my law license, which they’re still trying to do. The FBI investigates me for four years into the Biden Administration and then I get impeached by supposed Republicans.”
Welcome to Lawfare, funded in part by USAID. They did the same to DJT. It is still happening.
Interesting Tweet getting circulation in the wake of fresh interest in Benghazi 9/11/2012:
https://x.com/Joe_S_Pure/status/1887861517824991600
“Obama and Hillary were in full panic mode, so Ambassador Stevens was sent to Benghazi to retrieve the rest of the Stinger Missiles. This was a “do-or-die” mission, which explains the Stand Down Orders given to multiple rescue teams during the siege of the US Embassy.”
FWIW
fwiw
2011
That is Hillary at her most devious.
The anger is spreading… (strong language)
Nice!
What if tax day came and went and nobody paid any attention…
paid
“Build Inflation Better” – USpAID
“Inflation is a stealth tax.” – Donald J. Trump
https://rumble.com/v2igcnm-ukraine-war-causes-inflation-and-higher-rates-martin-armstrong.html
Build an apparatus, get apparatchiks.
Stephen Miller Reminds Us That Pretty Much Everyone in Government Is Unelected
https://rumble.com/v6ia7ly-stephen-miller-reminds-us-that-pretty-much-everyone-in-government-is-unelec.html
I think the facts point out that Rubio’s previous positions make him well aware of the cia and USAID.
USAID has now been placed under Rubio’s area of responsibility which brings up the question of where his loyalties lie.
I don’t think President Trump knows where Rubio’s loyalties are.
I don’t think Rubio knows where his loyalties are.
President Trump has given Rubio the opportunity to prove himself as our president is prone to do with people.
Rubio has been placed at the fork in the road by President Trump and it will be up to Rubio himself which road he chooses.
He appears to be anti-communist.
I’m not sure if he knows what that means.
I’m not sure if anti-fascists know what that means.
I’m not a definer, marxist propaganda redefines itself repetitively.
“The bureaucracy is the state.” – Mussolini
“Freedom of Speech?! We are not going to commit suicide.” – Lenin
As Sundance frequently reminds us, “There are Trillions at stake”.
This is also the context for the envelopes at the George H.W. Bush funeral. An argument can be made that GHW Bush as CIA Director was the originator and architect of the CIA/USAID business model we are now discussing. Bush knew the politicians would have to benefit from the business, in order to advance the operation.
Had forgotten about those envelopes, Sundance. I seem to recall that the look on the faces of those recipients (particularly the treasonous Clintons) was one of disconcertment.
I figured at the time that it was some kind of grave news or heads-up; maybe, in hindsight, they were paychecks … but for less than was hoped for?
Would be curious to see others’ speculations …
speculations
Old propaganda rule… the less is known, the more is speculated.
The envelopes had USAID crypto gift cards or they were empty.
“I just copied this from the USAID website.”
https://rumble.com/v6ggysg-usaid-is-not-about-aid-its-a-deep-state-foreign-interference-agency.html
The question becomes, as Rubio advanced with 99-0 and was on the Foreign Relations Committee, whether he is trusted to advance the policies of Trump. Fingers crossed that he has seen the light, but since the beginning of our conversation here about him, it has always been questionable.
What to do with the ring of power, throw it into Mount Doom or keep it as a “force for good in the world”?
After watching the Tucker interview with Benz I am inclined to think that he and many others want to keep it.
Soft power and pencils.
AI and the Dark Tower of Barad-dûr.
There is zero CIA oversight, and the mission mandate as authorized by congress permits the CIA to remain entirely closed from any oversight or scrutiny.
Time for that to change. There needs to be an extreme oversight over the CIA. With their history, one committee alone is not enough to “supervise” this criminal organization. The CIA has operated in darkness since the day Truman signed the legislation (which he immediately regretted by the way). Not only should the CIA be subject to oversight, the CIA should be subject to MULTIPLE levels of oversight given their checkered past. If there are too many objections, then SHUT IT DOWN!!
Even as a child, I eventually started to wonder about all those commercials I saw about “helping” people in other countries.
It seemed like generous Americans helped and helped, and nothing got any better.
Re: Benghazi- this is going around:
Spot on, which raises a question for me. Is Pres Trump truly starting a confrontation that very likely cannot be won, or is this just a trust building or political exercise?
It shall soon be proven facts that show us the American people that every facet of our federal government is corrupt.
These are not conspiracy theories, right wing or left wing the bird needs to be dissected and destroyed.
Agree totally about the CIA but that image is just a blur to me. What is it?