The Weissmann/Mueller report contains claims that Russia hacked the DNC servers as the central element to the Russia interference narrative in the U.S. election. This DNC hack claim is the fulcrum issue structurally underpinning the Russian election interference narrative pushed by the Weissmann and Muller Special Counsel. However, this essential claim is directly disputed by WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, as outlined during a Dana Rohrabacher interview and by Julian Assange’s own on-the-record statements.
Assange was arrested at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London immediately after the Weissmann/Muller report was released to Bill Barr. Despite investigating the background of the Trump-Russia nonsense, John Durham never touched the DNC hacking claim – the core of the Mueller report. Why? Because Durham knew the U.S. Government threw a bag over Assange to protect the fraudulent Trump-Russia and Russian interference claims.
Again, this reality speaks to the corruption within the John Durham investigation. Durham was protecting Weissmann, Mueller and the core of their justification for a 2-year investigation. Durham knows why Assange was arrested. Durham stayed away from it, intentionally.
The Russians HAD TO have made efforts to interfere in the election, or else the factual basis for the surveillance operation against candidate Donald Trump is naked to the world.
That’s why so much DOJ, FBI and Mueller special counsel energy was exhausted framing the predicate.
“Seventeen intelligence agencies,” the December 29th Joint Analysis Report, the expulsion of the Russian diplomats which was an outcropping of the JAR, the rushed January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment, shoving microphones in everyone’s faces and demanding they answer if they believed Russia interfered – all of it, and I do mean every bit of it, is predicated on an absolute DC need to establish that Russia Attempted to Interfere in the 2016 election.
The “Russian Malicious Cyber Activity – Joint Analysis Report” (full pdf) is pure nonsense. It outlines nothing more than vague and disingenuous typical hacking activity that is no more substantive than any other hacking report on any other foreign actor. However, it was needed to help frame the Russian interference narrative.
There were no Russian diplomats involved; there was no Russian election interference; there was no Russian hacking of the DNC; it was all a fraud created by the intelligence community (IC), FBI and Main Justice to support Hillary Clinton’s lies and then cover their own targeting tracks.
On September 26, 2021, Yahoo News published an extensive article about the CIA targeting WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange in 2017 and the extreme conversations that were taking place at the highest levels of the U.S. government about how to control him.
There is a much bigger story transparently obvious when overlapped with CTH research files on the Mueller investigation and the U.S. intelligence community. Specifically, the motive intentionally not outlined by Yahoo News.
What I am going to share is a deep dive using the resources and timeline from within that Yahoo article and the specific details we have assembled that paints a clear picture about what interests existed for the Deep State, the Intelligence apparatus and the Mueller-Weissmann special counsel.
This fully cited review is not for the faint of heart. This is a journey that could shock many; it could alarm more and will likely force more than a few to reevaluate just what the purpose was for Mike Pompeo within the Donald Trump administration.
As the Yahoo News article begins, they outline how those within the Trump administration viewed Assange as a risk in 2017.
Here it is critical to accept that many people inside the Trump administration were there to control events, not to facilitate a policy agenda from a political outsider. In the example of Assange, the information he carried was a risk to those who attempted and failed to stop Trump from winning the 2016 election.
Julian Assange was not a threat to Donald Trump, but he was a threat to those who attempted to stop Donald Trump. In 2017, the DC system was reacting to a presidency they did not control. As an outcome, the Office of the President was being managed and influenced by some with ulterior motives.
Yahoo, via Michael Isikoff, puts it this way: “Some senior officials inside the CIA and the Trump administration even discussed killing Assange, going so far as to request “sketches” or “options” for how to assassinate him. Discussions over kidnapping or killing Assange occurred “at the highest levels” of the Trump administration, said a former senior counterintelligence official. “There seemed to be no boundaries.”
As we overlay the timeline, it is prudent to pause and remember some hindsight details. According to reports in November of 2019, U.S. Attorney John Durham and U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr were spending time looking carefully at CIA activity in the 2016 presidential election. One quote from a media-voice increasingly sympathetic to a political deep-state noted:
“One British official with knowledge of Barr’s wish list presented to London commented that, “It is like nothing we have come across before, they are basically asking, in quite robust terms, for help in doing a hatchet job on their own intelligence services”“. (Link)
It is interesting that quote came from a British intelligence official, as there was extensive pre-2016 election evidence of an FBI/CIA counterintelligence operation that also involved U.K. intelligence services. There was an aspect to the FBI/CIA operation that overlaps with both a U.S. and U.K. need to keep Wikileaks founder Julian Assange under tight control.
To understand the risk that Julian Assange represented to FBI/CIA interests, and effectively the Mueller special counsel, it is important to understand just how extensive the operations of the FBI/CIA were in 2016. It is within this network of foreign and domestic operations where FBI Agent Peter Strzok was clearly working as a bridge between the CIA and FBI operations.
By now, people are familiar with the construct of CIA operations involving Joseph Mifsud, a Maltese professor generally identified as a western intelligence operative who was tasked by the FBI/CIA to run an operation against Trump campaign official George Papadopoulos in both Italy (Rome) and London. {Go Deep} John Durham ignored him.
In a similar fashion, the FBI tasked U.S. intelligence asset Stefan Halper to target another Trump campaign official, Carter Page. Under the auspices of being a Cambridge Professor, Stefan Halper also targeted General Michael Flynn. Additionally, using assistance from a female FBI agent, under the false name Azra Turk, Halper also targeted Papadopoulos. Again, John Durham ignored it.
The initial operations to target Flynn, Papadopoulos and Page were all based overseas. This seemingly makes the CIA exploitation of the assets and the targets legal and much easier. If Durham went into this intelligence rabbit hole, there would be a paper trail that leads back to Robert Mueller. Durham didn’t go there.
John Durham and IG Michael Horowitz both outlined how very specific exculpatory evidence was known to the FBI and Main Justice, yet that evidence was withheld from the FISA application used against Carter Page and/or it was ignored. The FBI fabricated information in the FISA and removed evidence that Carter Page was previously working for the CIA. This is what FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith was indicted and convicted for doing.
One week after the FBI and DOJ filed the second renewal for the Carter Page FISA [April 7, 2017], Yahoo News notes how Mike Pompeo delivered his first remarks as CIA Director:
[…] On April 13, 2017, wearing a U.S. flag pin on the left lapel of his dark gray suit, Pompeo strode to the podium at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), a Washington think tank, to deliver to a standing-room-only crowd his first public remarks as Trump’s CIA director.
Rather than use the platform to give an overview of global challenges or to lay out any bureaucratic changes he was planning to make at the agency, Pompeo devoted much of his speech to the threat posed by WikiLeaks. (link)
Why would CIA Director Mike Pompeo be so concerned about Julian Assange and Wikileaks in April 2017?
In April of 2017 Pompeo’s boss, President Donald Trump, was under assault from the intelligence community writ large, and every deep state actor was leaking to the media in a frenzied effort to continue the Trump-Russia collusion conspiracy.
The Trump-Russia effort was so all consuming that FBI Director James Comey was even keeping a diary of engagement with President Trump in order to support an ongoing investigation built on fraud – yet, Mike Pompeo is worried about Julian Assange.
Again, here it is important to put yourself back into the time of reference. Remember, it’s clear in the text messages between FBI Agent Strzok and Lisa Page that Peter Strzok had a working relationship with what he called their “sister agency”, the CIA.
♦ Former CIA Director John Brennan admitted Peter Strzok helped write the January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) which outlines the Russia narrative; and it was also Peter Strzok who authored the July 31st, 2016, “Electronic Communication” from the CIA to the FBI that originated FBI operation “Crossfire Hurricane.” Strzok immediately used that EC to travel to London to debrief intelligence officials around Australian Ambassador to the U.K. Alexander Downer.
In short, Peter Strzok was a profoundly overzealous James Bond wannabe who acted as a bridge between the CIA and the FBI. The perfect type of FBI career agent for 2016’s CIA Director John Brennan to utilize.
Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson hired CIA Open-Source analyst Nellie Ohr toward the end of 2015, at appropriately the same time as “FBI Contractors” were identified exploiting the NSA database and extracting information on a specific set of U.S. persons. One, if not the primary extractors, has now been identified as Rodney Joffe at Neustar. “The campaign plot was outlined by Durham in a 27-page indictment charging former Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann with making a false report to the FBI. The plot was also outlined in the finished Durham report. Eight individuals who allegedly conspired with Sussmann but does not identify them by name. The sources familiar with the probe confirmed that the leader of the team of contractors was Rodney L. Joffe.” {Go Deep}
It was also Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson who was domestically tasked with a Russian lobbyist named Natalia Veselnitskaya. A little reported Russian Deputy Attorney General named Saak Albertovich Karapetyan was working as a double agent for the CIA and Kremlin. Karapetyan was directing the foreign operations of Natalia Veselnitskaya, and Glenn Simpson was organizing her inside the U.S as part of his Trump-Russia creation.
Glenn Simpson managed Veselnitskaya through the 2016 Trump Tower meeting with Donald Trump Jr. However, once the CIA/Fusion GPS operation using Veselnitskaya started to unravel with public reporting, back in Russia Deputy AG Karapetyan died in a helicopter crash.
Simultaneously timed in late 2015 through mid 2016, there was a domestic FBI operation using a young Russian named Maria Butina tasked to run up against Republican presidential candidates. According to Patrick Byrne, Butina’s handler, was FBI agent Peter Strzok who was giving Byrne the instructions on where to send her. {Go Deep}
All of this context outlines the extent to which the FBI/CIA was openly involved in constructing a political operation that settled upon anyone in candidate Donald Trump’s orbit. A large international operation directed by the FBI/CIA and domestic operations seemingly directed by Peter Strzok operating with a foot in both agencies. [Strzok gets CIA service coin] Durham eviscerated the predicate for all of this in his report, yet stayed away from the part that leads to Robert Mueller in 2017.
Recap: ♦Mifsud tasked against Papadopoulos (CIA). ♦Halper tasked against Flynn (CIA), Page (CIA) and Papadopoulos (CIA). ♦Azra Turk, pretending to be Halper asst, tasked against Papadopoulos (FBI). ♦Veselnitskaya tasked against Donald Trump Jr. (CIA, Fusion GPS). ♦Butina tasked against Trump and Donald Trump Jr (FBI).
Additionally, Christopher Steele was a British intelligence officer hired by Fusion GPS to assemble and launder fraudulent intelligence information within his dossier. And we cannot forget Oleg Deripaska, a Russian oligarch, who was recruited by Asst. FBI Director Andrew McCabe to participate in running an operation against the Trump campaign and create the impression of Russian involvement. Deripaska refused to participate.
All of this engagement directly controlled by U.S. intelligence, and all of this intended to give a specific Russia impression. This predicate was what John Durham was reviewing in November of 2019, and then released in his final report – while whitewashing the parts that led to the Mueller silo.
The key point of all that contextual background is to see how committed the CIA and FBI were to the constructed narrative of Russia interfering with the 2016 election. The CIA, FBI, and by extension the DOJ and a multitude of political operatives, put a hell of a lot of work into it.
We know John Durham looked at the construct of the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA); and talking to CIA analysts who participated in the construct of the January 2017 report that bolstered the false appearance of Russian interference in the 2016 election. This context is important, because it ties in to the next part that involves Julian Assange and Wikileaks. This is where the motives of Mike Pompeo in mid/late 2017 come into play.
[…] By the summer of 2017, the CIA’s proposals were setting off alarm bells at the National Security Council. “WikiLeaks was a complete obsession of Pompeo’s,” said a former Trump administration national security official. (link)
On April 11th, 2019, the Julian Assange indictment was unsealed in the Eastern District of Virginia (EDVA). From the indictment we discover it was under seal since March 6th, 2018:
On Tuesday April 15, 2019, more investigative material was released. Again, note the dates: Grand Jury, *December of 2017* This means FBI investigation prior to….
The FBI investigation took place prior to December 2017, it was coordinated through the Eastern District of Virginia (EDVA) where Dana Boente was U.S. Attorney at the time. The grand jury indictment was sealed from March of 2018 until after Mueller completed his investigation, April 2019.
Why the delay?
What exactly was the DOJ waiting for from March 2018 to April 2019?
This timeframe is the peak of the Robert Mueller/Andrew Weissmann special counsel investigation.
Here’s where it gets interesting….
The Yahoo article outlines, “There was an inappropriate level of attention to Assange“, by the CIA according to a national security council official. However, if you consider the larger ramifications of what Julian Assange represented to all of those people inside and outside government interests who created the Trump-Russia collusion/conspiracy, well, there was actually a serious risk.
Remember, in May 2017 Robert Mueller and Andrew Weissmann effectively took over the DOJ. The purpose of the Mueller investigation was to cover up the illegal operation that took place in the preceding year. The people exposed in the Trump-Russia targeting operation included all of those intelligence operatives previously outlined in the CIA, FBI and DOJ operations. These are the people John Durham did not indict.
The FBI submission to the Eastern District of Virginia Grand Jury in December of 2017 was four months after congressman Dana Rohrabacher talked to Julian Assange in August of 2017: “Assange told a U.S. congressman … he can prove the leaked Democratic Party documents … did not come from Russia.”
(August 2017, The Hill Via John Solomon) Julian Assange told a U.S. congressman on Tuesday he can prove the leaked Democratic Party documents he published during last year’s election did not come from Russia and promised additional helpful information about the leaks in the near future.
Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, a California Republican who is friendly to Russia and chairs an important House subcommittee on Eurasia policy, became the first American congressman to meet with Assange during a three-hour private gathering at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, where the WikiLeaks founder has been holed up for years.
Rohrabacher recounted his conversation with Assange to The Hill.
“Our three-hour meeting covered a wide array of issues, including the WikiLeaks exposure of the DNC [Democratic National Committee] emails during last year’s presidential election,” Rohrabacher said, “Julian emphatically stated that the Russians were not involved in the hacking or disclosure of those emails.”
Pressed for more detail on the source of the documents, Rohrabacher said he had information to share privately with President Trump. (read more)
Dana Rohrabacher later published this account of the events:
Knowing how much effort the CIA and FBI put into the Russia collusion-conspiracy narrative; and knowing that Assange could essentially destroy the baseline predicate for the entire Trump-Russia investigation – which included the use of Robert Mueller; it would make sense for corrupt government officials to take keen interest after this August 2017 meeting between Rohrabacher and Assange.
That contact between Rohrabacher and Assange explains why those same government officials would quickly gather specific evidence (related to Wikileaks and Bradley Manning) for a grand jury by December 2017.
Within three months of the grand jury seating (Nov/Dec 2017), the DOJ generated an indictment and sealed it in March 2018.
The EDVA then sat on the Julian Assange indictment while the Mueller/Weissman probe was ongoing.
As soon as the Mueller probe ended, on April 11th, 2019, a planned and coordinated effort between the U.K. and U.S. was executed; Julian Assange was forcibly arrested and removed from the Ecuadorian embassy in London, and the EDVA indictment was unsealed (link).
As a person who researched this fiasco, including the ridiculously false 2016 Russian hacking/interference narrative: “17 intelligence agencies”, Joint Analysis Report (JAR) needed for Obama’s anti-Russia narrative in December ’16, and then a month later the ridiculously political Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) in January ’17, this timing against Assange is not coincidental.
It doesn’t take a deep researcher to see the aligned Deep State motive to control Julian Assange, because the Mueller report was dependent on Russia cybercrimes, and that narrative is contingent on the Russia DNC hack story which Julian Assange disputes. Again, John Durham stayed away from it!
♦ This is critical. The Weissmann/Mueller report contains claims that Russia hacked the DNC servers as the central element to the Russia interference narrative in the U.S. election.
This claim is the fulcrum underpinning the Russia election interference narrative. However, this core and essential claim is directly disputed by Julian Assange, as outlined during the Dana Rohrabacher interview, and by Julian Assange’s on-the-record statements.
The predicate for Robert Mueller’s investigation was specifically due to Russian interference in the 2016 election.
The fulcrum for this Russia interference claim is the intelligence community assessment (Peter Strzok); and the only factual evidence claimed within the ICA is that Russia hacked the DNC servers; a claim only made possible by relying on forensic computer analysis from another Michael Sussmann partner, Shawn Henry at Crowdstrike, yes another DNC contractor and collaborator with the Clinton campaign.
The CIA held a massive conflict of self-interest problem surrounding the Russian hacking claim as it pertained to their own activity in 2016. The FBI and DOJ always held a massive interest in maintaining the Russian hacking claim. Robert Mueller and Andrew Weismann did everything they could to support that predicate; and all of those foreign countries whose intelligence apparatus participated with Brennan and Strzok also carried a self-interest in maintaining that Russia hacking and interference narrative.
Julian Assange was/is the only person with direct knowledge of how Wikileaks gained custody of the DNC emails; and Assange claimed he has evidence it was from an inside DNC leak, not from a DNC hack.
The Russian “hacking” claim was ultimately so important to the CIA, FBI, DOJ, ODNI and U.K Intelligence apparatus. Well, right there is the obvious motive to shut Assange down as soon as intelligence officials knew the Mueller report was going to be public. And that is exactly what Main Justice and the U.S. intelligence community did.
This is why John Durham never touched it.
All of them know what happened.
All of them know why Julian Assange was taken from the Embassy in London. A bag had to be thrown over Assange in order to retain the justification for the Weissmann/Mueller special counsel and the larger Russian election interference claims. None of them do not know this. They all know.
Put the panel of Barr, Rosenstein, Horowitz, Mueller, Weissmann, Durham and Wray in front of congress. Ask each one: “Who is Seth Rich?”
Then start asking the right questions about the timeline of Assange being arrested. Ask them about the DNC hack and Russian provenance according to Crowdstrike. Ask them key and specific questions about the FBI working with Crowdstrike and about the DOJ and EDVA case against Assange. Watch them squirm.
They all know what happened. SO DO WE!
Ask them questions about it in public. Watch them squirm.
Sundance,
I hope that you are getting inquiries from other media sources and outlets to learn more about all of the amazing documentation and research!
In a world of soundbites, throwaway lines and routine errors of omission and commission, your site is even more welcome and necessary.
Been following for years but don’t comment much. Sundance should go by the name Sunlight because I see more now than I ever did in my 64 years. I believe this cabal of crooks and traitors and scum aren’t going down by an honest vote either because they know the results of said vote. They’ll pull the country down with them and burn it all to the ground to stay in power. Hence, we either start getting real rowdy or we are going to lose our country. JMO.
It is also important to note that Assange had a CIA-linked lawyer for a long time. William Kunstler spent World War II in the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), the forerunner of the CIA. When he was the attorney for the Chicago 8, and later the Chicago 7, Kunstler was seen having lunch frequently with a federal judge named Hubert Will, who was once the head of Counterintelligence for CIA in Europe.
Wow! All dots connected. MAGA 👊👊🙏🏻🙏🏻❤️❤️🇺🇸🇺🇸
SOLID! And Plain as the Glaring sun in the sky!
Amen!
God will Tend to This Matter. To the Last Iota.
There are a couple of things missing from the great article:
1- Don’t forget Gina Hospital who later became head of CIA. She had to be involved in the FBI/CIA/UK intelligence operations against trump as she was the head of CIA in the UK. DUH, Occams razor: she was promoted because she was a team player and she knew too much.
2 – Don’t forget that Julius Assange knew all the intelligence links between their criminal past during Obama and Bush and their criminal present of the Trump era. Assange knew about what they were doing for the years prior as well as with trump. He also had to know who the old players were in the admins of bush / Clinton. This is why Mueller was there: if they went down all of the past criminals would go down with them from the Bush Clinton era and Prior. Decades of criminals were in deep danger.
Sorry, That is CIA Gina Haspel.
Heh, “Hospital” (o:
One other thing, Sundance — as pointed out frequently at the time (years ago when this all this about Hillary’s private email server first came to light) and most recently by Dan Bongino:
All. Roads. Lead. To. Obama.
Recall that the revelation of Hillary’s email server trafficking in CLASSIFIED INFORMATION (and concomitant violation of the Espionage Act as well as having been HACKED BY NUMEROUS FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS — “friend” and foe alike) only occurred after the Benghazi fiasco/scandal (further treason) when Congress subpoenaed Hillary’s “State Department” emails and was informed that she had NO STATE DEPARTMENT EMAIL.
Obama’s communication platforms (e.g. government Blackberry and other computers) would not have permitted ANY emails from Hillary’s private UNSECURE email account … unless explicitly WHITELISTED, and so Obama HAD TO KNOW that Hillary was using an UNSECURED email account & server for communicating CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS.
That is, he was aware of HILLARY’S TREASON AND VIOLATION OF THE ESPIONAGE ACT, which makes him guilty of the same. And THIS is why all the stops have been pulled out to protect the “DogEating Lightbringer Half-Black Full-Commie Messiah.”
Bingo.
That was so thorough…I will definitely need to reread it.
Bless Sundance and PDJT for the sunlight ☀️
I tried to read all of this. to many twist and turns and to many nonimportant details. all i want to know is who are the good guys. you never touched that.
We have no FBI no C.I.A. no D.O.J. no Supreme Court that will defend or uphold the consitution . We only have a woke , Useless military that are lead by cowards. God help us.
All roads eventually lead back to Barry Soetoro aka Barrack Obama!!! He green lighted everything at the very beginning!!! 🤨
May God Almighty protect Sundance!! He is wise and all knowing, and I pray all that he knows gets to the correct people in congress. Subpoenas should be issued to ALL people involved. Hopefully the congress critters will ask the correct questions (perhaps supplied by Sundance) and bring to light for the American people to see and the lawyers (military?) to bring charges at Gitmo, followed by a quick hangings.
I sometimes see that midget Weissman by NYU Law School. I’ve got questions now!
The Congress should always have hearings under oath not behind cameras, but in front of cameras. Behind the camera, these traitors say something else but in front of cameras it is totally opposite. So people never get the clear picture. I think people are politically very immature and they are fooled every election by the cruel politicians, who join hands with rich people. Only Trump was the right person and I hope and pray everyday that he is our president again in 2024.
Remember those Clancy novels where the 3 letters were the good guys?😄
Propaganda. Always was. Just like all the crime solving and FBI TV shows, Bourne and Mission Impossible movies. None of that is even close to reality.
They use those outlets to convince gullible audiences that the organizations have capabilities, missions, practices and level of accountability that they simply do not have. Years ago, people in CIA thought the FBI were turds. Then Webster was made DCI and everyone knew they actually were turds. Now the CIA is a turd too.
Lack of leadership. Ask how idiots like Brennon and Morrell rise to the top.
Has julian assange ever been convicted of anything? I know he is in prison
unrelated to wikileaks, julian was convicted of “failure to appear”…he refused to appear in UK court facing allegations of a “rape” charge…consensual sex BTW…in Sweden…where the “victim” claimed he either did not wear a condom or the condom broke…yeah…sweden has a very different interpretation of what RAPE means. (dive deep to learn more about how this allegation magically happened after some pressure from the US toward sweden).
His failure to appear was a crime in UK. He served the sentence. fully. The “rape” charge was dropped by the way for lack of evidence.
his current DETENTION is being enforced by the UK government while he awaits extradiction to the US to face criminal allegations of “whatever the secret police state has manufactured as his crime”….it’s 17/18 unique charges…none of them make much sense unless it can be proven he himself directly stole secret protected material or aiding manning to do it. Which will come down to proving it with material evidence and manning testifying to these as provable facts.
his current incarceration is in a maximum security prison in the UK, without the benefit of bail/bond. The UK has upheld this incarceration without any prior precedence to do so in a max prison setting and has provided no reasonable explanation why a non violent “alleged” offender facing criminal charges IN ANOTHER COUNTRY (THE US), would be held in such hard core facilities, given there are several other holding facilities more suitable for those non violent persons awaiting trials and hearings.
you can assume from this that the reason he is being held in such hard core conditions, without the benefit of bail/bond is because the UK secret police spy state has an agenda that is aligned with the US secret police spy state:
publishers must never go unpunished for printing the truth of criminal activities of powerful governments.
that’s what it boils down to.
this is sending a message…and it’s basically giving an insurance policy that julian never has a fair trial and is unlikely to ever be released from prison or the continued real grave threat that his life is literally in the hands of those who would prefer that he simply die in prison and never make it to a court room, where discovery would be a very uncomfortable damning circumstance.
my own view: even IF julian committed some crimes…and I’m not convinced he hasn’t…this is not how justice should be operating. He has a right to a fair trial…period. INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY. PERIOD.
if the purpose of the incarceration is a risk of flight…I am certain he can be released on bail/bond and have his passports removed…just like the 80 or so russian oligarths and FSB agents who were released on bail facing much more serious UK LAW VIOLATIONS.
what makes this case unique, is that the UK has no standing case of violations against assange…none. his time has already been served for the failure to appear crime. The UK is holding him FOR THE US….it’s more than just a little strange.
God Bless America
Here is a question to ask everyone on the left and right going back years. They all knew hillary was using a private server as senator and SOS. Why didn’t anyone put a stop to it?
Fear of Vince Foster? Yeah, we have a lot of heroes, don’t we?
I think the current formation of BRICS and the US + 5 eyes fighting a proxy Ukrainian war against Russia shines the most light on what happened.
Rohrabacher “was friendly with Russia” and likely a back door effort to communicate with Trump.
The same people pushing the proxy Ukrainian war against Russia today are the same people who screamed Russia! Russia! Russia! The same people laundering their global corporate money through the Ukraine.
As the relationship between the Globalist/Clinton/Obama mobsters and the Russians begin to split, information damaging to the Clinton/ Obama cabals begins to leak.
It is Clinton 101 to accuse others of what they themselves are doing. By their linking Trump and Russia! Russia, they could accuse Trump collusion with Russia if Russia began leaking dirty info on Hillary and the rest of the Obama Hillary Globalist mobsters.
As the globalist mobsters tightened the screws on Russia through sanctions, other countries began to take note and see the need to unite against their rising power.
And here we are today.
The DNC and hillery server were NOT hacked. It was intentional. So was podesta