The Weissmann/Mueller report contains claims that Russia hacked the DNC servers as the central element to the Russia interference narrative in the U.S. election. This DNC hack claim is the fulcrum issue structurally underpinning the Russian election interference narrative pushed by the Weissmann and Muller Special Counsel. However, this essential claim is directly disputed by WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, as outlined during a Dana Rohrabacher interview and by Julian Assange’s own on-the-record statements.
Assange was arrested at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London immediately after the Weissmann/Muller report was released to Bill Barr. Despite investigating the background of the Trump-Russia nonsense, John Durham never touched the DNC hacking claim – the core of the Mueller report. Why? Because Durham knew the U.S. Government threw a bag over Assange to protect the fraudulent Trump-Russia and Russian interference claims.
Again, this reality speaks to the corruption within the John Durham investigation. Durham was protecting Weissmann, Mueller and the core of their justification for a 2-year investigation. Durham knows why Assange was arrested. Durham stayed away from it, intentionally.
The Russians HAD TO have made efforts to interfere in the election, or else the factual basis for the surveillance operation against candidate Donald Trump is naked to the world.
That’s why so much DOJ, FBI and Mueller special counsel energy was exhausted framing the predicate.
“Seventeen intelligence agencies,” the December 29th Joint Analysis Report, the expulsion of the Russian diplomats which was an outcropping of the JAR, the rushed January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment, shoving microphones in everyone’s faces and demanding they answer if they believed Russia interfered – all of it, and I do mean every bit of it, is predicated on an absolute DC need to establish that Russia Attempted to Interfere in the 2016 election.
The “Russian Malicious Cyber Activity – Joint Analysis Report” (full pdf) is pure nonsense. It outlines nothing more than vague and disingenuous typical hacking activity that is no more substantive than any other hacking report on any other foreign actor. However, it was needed to help frame the Russian interference narrative.
There were no Russian diplomats involved; there was no Russian election interference; there was no Russian hacking of the DNC; it was all a fraud created by the intelligence community (IC), FBI and Main Justice to support Hillary Clinton’s lies and then cover their own targeting tracks.
On September 26, 2021, Yahoo News published an extensive article about the CIA targeting WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange in 2017 and the extreme conversations that were taking place at the highest levels of the U.S. government about how to control him.
There is a much bigger story transparently obvious when overlapped with CTH research files on the Mueller investigation and the U.S. intelligence community. Specifically, the motive intentionally not outlined by Yahoo News.
What I am going to share is a deep dive using the resources and timeline from within that Yahoo article and the specific details we have assembled that paints a clear picture about what interests existed for the Deep State, the Intelligence apparatus and the Mueller-Weissmann special counsel.
This fully cited review is not for the faint of heart. This is a journey that could shock many; it could alarm more and will likely force more than a few to reevaluate just what the purpose was for Mike Pompeo within the Donald Trump administration.
As the Yahoo News article begins, they outline how those within the Trump administration viewed Assange as a risk in 2017.
Here it is critical to accept that many people inside the Trump administration were there to control events, not to facilitate a policy agenda from a political outsider. In the example of Assange, the information he carried was a risk to those who attempted and failed to stop Trump from winning the 2016 election.
Julian Assange was not a threat to Donald Trump, but he was a threat to those who attempted to stop Donald Trump. In 2017, the DC system was reacting to a presidency they did not control. As an outcome, the Office of the President was being managed and influenced by some with ulterior motives.
Yahoo, via Michael Isikoff, puts it this way: “Some senior officials inside the CIA and the Trump administration even discussed killing Assange, going so far as to request “sketches” or “options” for how to assassinate him. Discussions over kidnapping or killing Assange occurred “at the highest levels” of the Trump administration, said a former senior counterintelligence official. “There seemed to be no boundaries.”
As we overlay the timeline, it is prudent to pause and remember some hindsight details. According to reports in November of 2019, U.S. Attorney John Durham and U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr were spending time looking carefully at CIA activity in the 2016 presidential election. One quote from a media-voice increasingly sympathetic to a political deep-state noted:
“One British official with knowledge of Barr’s wish list presented to London commented that, “It is like nothing we have come across before, they are basically asking, in quite robust terms, for help in doing a hatchet job on their own intelligence services”“. (Link)
It is interesting that quote came from a British intelligence official, as there was extensive pre-2016 election evidence of an FBI/CIA counterintelligence operation that also involved U.K. intelligence services. There was an aspect to the FBI/CIA operation that overlaps with both a U.S. and U.K. need to keep Wikileaks founder Julian Assange under tight control.
To understand the risk that Julian Assange represented to FBI/CIA interests, and effectively the Mueller special counsel, it is important to understand just how extensive the operations of the FBI/CIA were in 2016. It is within this network of foreign and domestic operations where FBI Agent Peter Strzok was clearly working as a bridge between the CIA and FBI operations.
By now, people are familiar with the construct of CIA operations involving Joseph Mifsud, a Maltese professor generally identified as a western intelligence operative who was tasked by the FBI/CIA to run an operation against Trump campaign official George Papadopoulos in both Italy (Rome) and London. {Go Deep} John Durham ignored him.
In a similar fashion, the FBI tasked U.S. intelligence asset Stefan Halper to target another Trump campaign official, Carter Page. Under the auspices of being a Cambridge Professor, Stefan Halper also targeted General Michael Flynn. Additionally, using assistance from a female FBI agent, under the false name Azra Turk, Halper also targeted Papadopoulos. Again, John Durham ignored it.
The initial operations to target Flynn, Papadopoulos and Page were all based overseas. This seemingly makes the CIA exploitation of the assets and the targets legal and much easier. If Durham went into this intelligence rabbit hole, there would be a paper trail that leads back to Robert Mueller. Durham didn’t go there.
John Durham and IG Michael Horowitz both outlined how very specific exculpatory evidence was known to the FBI and Main Justice, yet that evidence was withheld from the FISA application used against Carter Page and/or it was ignored. The FBI fabricated information in the FISA and removed evidence that Carter Page was previously working for the CIA. This is what FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith was indicted and convicted for doing.
One week after the FBI and DOJ filed the second renewal for the Carter Page FISA [April 7, 2017], Yahoo News notes how Mike Pompeo delivered his first remarks as CIA Director:
[…] On April 13, 2017, wearing a U.S. flag pin on the left lapel of his dark gray suit, Pompeo strode to the podium at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), a Washington think tank, to deliver to a standing-room-only crowd his first public remarks as Trump’s CIA director.
Rather than use the platform to give an overview of global challenges or to lay out any bureaucratic changes he was planning to make at the agency, Pompeo devoted much of his speech to the threat posed by WikiLeaks. (link)
Why would CIA Director Mike Pompeo be so concerned about Julian Assange and Wikileaks in April 2017?
In April of 2017 Pompeo’s boss, President Donald Trump, was under assault from the intelligence community writ large, and every deep state actor was leaking to the media in a frenzied effort to continue the Trump-Russia collusion conspiracy.
The Trump-Russia effort was so all consuming that FBI Director James Comey was even keeping a diary of engagement with President Trump in order to support an ongoing investigation built on fraud – yet, Mike Pompeo is worried about Julian Assange.
Again, here it is important to put yourself back into the time of reference. Remember, it’s clear in the text messages between FBI Agent Strzok and Lisa Page that Peter Strzok had a working relationship with what he called their “sister agency”, the CIA.
♦ Former CIA Director John Brennan admitted Peter Strzok helped write the January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) which outlines the Russia narrative; and it was also Peter Strzok who authored the July 31st, 2016, “Electronic Communication” from the CIA to the FBI that originated FBI operation “Crossfire Hurricane.” Strzok immediately used that EC to travel to London to debrief intelligence officials around Australian Ambassador to the U.K. Alexander Downer.
In short, Peter Strzok was a profoundly overzealous James Bond wannabe who acted as a bridge between the CIA and the FBI. The perfect type of FBI career agent for 2016’s CIA Director John Brennan to utilize.
Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson hired CIA Open-Source analyst Nellie Ohr toward the end of 2015, at appropriately the same time as “FBI Contractors” were identified exploiting the NSA database and extracting information on a specific set of U.S. persons. One, if not the primary extractors, has now been identified as Rodney Joffe at Neustar. “The campaign plot was outlined by Durham in a 27-page indictment charging former Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann with making a false report to the FBI. The plot was also outlined in the finished Durham report. Eight individuals who allegedly conspired with Sussmann but does not identify them by name. The sources familiar with the probe confirmed that the leader of the team of contractors was Rodney L. Joffe.” {Go Deep}
It was also Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson who was domestically tasked with a Russian lobbyist named Natalia Veselnitskaya. A little reported Russian Deputy Attorney General named Saak Albertovich Karapetyan was working as a double agent for the CIA and Kremlin. Karapetyan was directing the foreign operations of Natalia Veselnitskaya, and Glenn Simpson was organizing her inside the U.S as part of his Trump-Russia creation.
Glenn Simpson managed Veselnitskaya through the 2016 Trump Tower meeting with Donald Trump Jr. However, once the CIA/Fusion GPS operation using Veselnitskaya started to unravel with public reporting, back in Russia Deputy AG Karapetyan died in a helicopter crash.
Simultaneously timed in late 2015 through mid 2016, there was a domestic FBI operation using a young Russian named Maria Butina tasked to run up against Republican presidential candidates. According to Patrick Byrne, Butina’s handler, was FBI agent Peter Strzok who was giving Byrne the instructions on where to send her. {Go Deep}
All of this context outlines the extent to which the FBI/CIA was openly involved in constructing a political operation that settled upon anyone in candidate Donald Trump’s orbit. A large international operation directed by the FBI/CIA and domestic operations seemingly directed by Peter Strzok operating with a foot in both agencies. [Strzok gets CIA service coin] Durham eviscerated the predicate for all of this in his report, yet stayed away from the part that leads to Robert Mueller in 2017.
Recap: ♦Mifsud tasked against Papadopoulos (CIA). ♦Halper tasked against Flynn (CIA), Page (CIA) and Papadopoulos (CIA). ♦Azra Turk, pretending to be Halper asst, tasked against Papadopoulos (FBI). ♦Veselnitskaya tasked against Donald Trump Jr. (CIA, Fusion GPS). ♦Butina tasked against Trump and Donald Trump Jr (FBI).
Additionally, Christopher Steele was a British intelligence officer hired by Fusion GPS to assemble and launder fraudulent intelligence information within his dossier. And we cannot forget Oleg Deripaska, a Russian oligarch, who was recruited by Asst. FBI Director Andrew McCabe to participate in running an operation against the Trump campaign and create the impression of Russian involvement. Deripaska refused to participate.
All of this engagement directly controlled by U.S. intelligence, and all of this intended to give a specific Russia impression. This predicate was what John Durham was reviewing in November of 2019, and then released in his final report – while whitewashing the parts that led to the Mueller silo.
The key point of all that contextual background is to see how committed the CIA and FBI were to the constructed narrative of Russia interfering with the 2016 election. The CIA, FBI, and by extension the DOJ and a multitude of political operatives, put a hell of a lot of work into it.
We know John Durham looked at the construct of the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA); and talking to CIA analysts who participated in the construct of the January 2017 report that bolstered the false appearance of Russian interference in the 2016 election. This context is important, because it ties in to the next part that involves Julian Assange and Wikileaks. This is where the motives of Mike Pompeo in mid/late 2017 come into play.
[…] By the summer of 2017, the CIA’s proposals were setting off alarm bells at the National Security Council. “WikiLeaks was a complete obsession of Pompeo’s,” said a former Trump administration national security official. (link)
On April 11th, 2019, the Julian Assange indictment was unsealed in the Eastern District of Virginia (EDVA). From the indictment we discover it was under seal since March 6th, 2018:
On Tuesday April 15, 2019, more investigative material was released. Again, note the dates: Grand Jury, *December of 2017* This means FBI investigation prior to….
The FBI investigation took place prior to December 2017, it was coordinated through the Eastern District of Virginia (EDVA) where Dana Boente was U.S. Attorney at the time. The grand jury indictment was sealed from March of 2018 until after Mueller completed his investigation, April 2019.
Why the delay?
What exactly was the DOJ waiting for from March 2018 to April 2019?
This timeframe is the peak of the Robert Mueller/Andrew Weissmann special counsel investigation.
Here’s where it gets interesting….
The Yahoo article outlines, “There was an inappropriate level of attention to Assange“, by the CIA according to a national security council official. However, if you consider the larger ramifications of what Julian Assange represented to all of those people inside and outside government interests who created the Trump-Russia collusion/conspiracy, well, there was actually a serious risk.
Remember, in May 2017 Robert Mueller and Andrew Weissmann effectively took over the DOJ. The purpose of the Mueller investigation was to cover up the illegal operation that took place in the preceding year. The people exposed in the Trump-Russia targeting operation included all of those intelligence operatives previously outlined in the CIA, FBI and DOJ operations. These are the people John Durham did not indict.
The FBI submission to the Eastern District of Virginia Grand Jury in December of 2017 was four months after congressman Dana Rohrabacher talked to Julian Assange in August of 2017: “Assange told a U.S. congressman … he can prove the leaked Democratic Party documents … did not come from Russia.”
(August 2017, The Hill Via John Solomon) Julian Assange told a U.S. congressman on Tuesday he can prove the leaked Democratic Party documents he published during last year’s election did not come from Russia and promised additional helpful information about the leaks in the near future.
Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, a California Republican who is friendly to Russia and chairs an important House subcommittee on Eurasia policy, became the first American congressman to meet with Assange during a three-hour private gathering at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, where the WikiLeaks founder has been holed up for years.
Rohrabacher recounted his conversation with Assange to The Hill.
“Our three-hour meeting covered a wide array of issues, including the WikiLeaks exposure of the DNC [Democratic National Committee] emails during last year’s presidential election,” Rohrabacher said, “Julian emphatically stated that the Russians were not involved in the hacking or disclosure of those emails.”
Pressed for more detail on the source of the documents, Rohrabacher said he had information to share privately with President Trump. (read more)
Dana Rohrabacher later published this account of the events:
Knowing how much effort the CIA and FBI put into the Russia collusion-conspiracy narrative; and knowing that Assange could essentially destroy the baseline predicate for the entire Trump-Russia investigation – which included the use of Robert Mueller; it would make sense for corrupt government officials to take keen interest after this August 2017 meeting between Rohrabacher and Assange.
That contact between Rohrabacher and Assange explains why those same government officials would quickly gather specific evidence (related to Wikileaks and Bradley Manning) for a grand jury by December 2017.
Within three months of the grand jury seating (Nov/Dec 2017), the DOJ generated an indictment and sealed it in March 2018.
The EDVA then sat on the Julian Assange indictment while the Mueller/Weissman probe was ongoing.
As soon as the Mueller probe ended, on April 11th, 2019, a planned and coordinated effort between the U.K. and U.S. was executed; Julian Assange was forcibly arrested and removed from the Ecuadorian embassy in London, and the EDVA indictment was unsealed (link).
As a person who researched this fiasco, including the ridiculously false 2016 Russian hacking/interference narrative: “17 intelligence agencies”, Joint Analysis Report (JAR) needed for Obama’s anti-Russia narrative in December ’16, and then a month later the ridiculously political Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) in January ’17, this timing against Assange is not coincidental.
It doesn’t take a deep researcher to see the aligned Deep State motive to control Julian Assange, because the Mueller report was dependent on Russia cybercrimes, and that narrative is contingent on the Russia DNC hack story which Julian Assange disputes. Again, John Durham stayed away from it!
♦ This is critical. The Weissmann/Mueller report contains claims that Russia hacked the DNC servers as the central element to the Russia interference narrative in the U.S. election.
This claim is the fulcrum underpinning the Russia election interference narrative. However, this core and essential claim is directly disputed by Julian Assange, as outlined during the Dana Rohrabacher interview, and by Julian Assange’s on-the-record statements.
The predicate for Robert Mueller’s investigation was specifically due to Russian interference in the 2016 election.
The fulcrum for this Russia interference claim is the intelligence community assessment (Peter Strzok); and the only factual evidence claimed within the ICA is that Russia hacked the DNC servers; a claim only made possible by relying on forensic computer analysis from another Michael Sussmann partner, Shawn Henry at Crowdstrike, yes another DNC contractor and collaborator with the Clinton campaign.
The CIA held a massive conflict of self-interest problem surrounding the Russian hacking claim as it pertained to their own activity in 2016. The FBI and DOJ always held a massive interest in maintaining the Russian hacking claim. Robert Mueller and Andrew Weismann did everything they could to support that predicate; and all of those foreign countries whose intelligence apparatus participated with Brennan and Strzok also carried a self-interest in maintaining that Russia hacking and interference narrative.
Julian Assange was/is the only person with direct knowledge of how Wikileaks gained custody of the DNC emails; and Assange claimed he has evidence it was from an inside DNC leak, not from a DNC hack.
The Russian “hacking” claim was ultimately so important to the CIA, FBI, DOJ, ODNI and U.K Intelligence apparatus. Well, right there is the obvious motive to shut Assange down as soon as intelligence officials knew the Mueller report was going to be public. And that is exactly what Main Justice and the U.S. intelligence community did.
This is why John Durham never touched it.
All of them know what happened.
All of them know why Julian Assange was taken from the Embassy in London. A bag had to be thrown over Assange in order to retain the justification for the Weissmann/Mueller special counsel and the larger Russian election interference claims. None of them do not know this. They all know.
Put the panel of Barr, Rosenstein, Horowitz, Mueller, Weissmann, Durham and Wray in front of congress. Ask each one: “Who is Seth Rich?”
Then start asking the right questions about the timeline of Assange being arrested. Ask them about the DNC hack and Russian provenance according to Crowdstrike. Ask them key and specific questions about the FBI working with Crowdstrike and about the DOJ and EDVA case against Assange. Watch them squirm.
They all know what happened. SO DO WE!
Ask them questions about it in public. Watch them squirm.
Yes! This all has to be unraveled in public with the perps on the hot seat, in the room together, on the telly. Look at who they persecute to see what they fear and what they are hiding. Julian Assange has been relentlessly pursued and prosecuted over the DNC hack and what he knows about it.
Whatever happened to freedom of the press?
Relentlessly bludgeon these perps with the logic of what what they have done here to Assange . If they are all together when questioned, how can they claim “National Security” needs to be protected and hide the truth?Exactly what national security is in danger?
We need protection from the likes of these players.
Who killed Seth Rich?His blood calls out to us, don’t you think?
My guess is, the DNC hired a couple of MS13 thugs to get rid of Rich. The bungled job was finished at the hospital. The MS13 thugs were eliminated. Then Rich’s parents were threatened to keep them quiet. The most cooperative man in this world is a dead man.
.
“Julian Assange was/is the only person with direct knowledge of how Wikileaks gained custody of the DNC emails; and Assange claimed he has evidence it was from an inside DNC leak, not from a DNC hack.”
I’m frustrated. Big mistake in not spilling this “evidence”. To what end, and for what purpose. He’s screwed up a lot more than his life for now-nonexistent journalist integrity(?), (a lucrative book deal some day?) (protecting someone who did, literally, commit a crime?) or whatever else was the reason for being cloak-and-daggar.
.
Protect the source.
.
WHY?
.
Suspect it’s his integrity to his cause but more likely DC doesn’t want him to reveal what Seth Rich knew.
.
Okay… “integrity”… to what cause?
Assange published indiscriminate reams of other individuals’ and entities’ private information, a lot of war porn, a lot of stuff that served no higher purpose other than gaining readership or infamy, a lot of stuff that was stolen, even some stuff that might cause personal or economic harm to others…
So again, I would ask, not just to you, but to everyone who has not thought this through: to what cause?
Shield laws (which vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction) give “journalists” a limited (not absolute but qualified) First Amendment privilege (not a right, note, let alone a higher right than anyone else) not to be forced to reveal confidential news sources in court. The media touts these fake “rights” a lot (everyone has heard of them because, well, the media). And we’ve seen of late lots of lying in the media, while asserting their “confidential sources”. All for money-making and possibly other dubious reasons.
The argument in favor of shield laws is to facilitate journalists’ abilities to gain information of genuine public importance.
That assumes a few things, including protecting ongoing journalistic endeavors that could be thwarted (no longer applicable to Assange, if they ever were) and genuine public interest (which overwhelmingly in this case would have been revealing the truth, not hiding it.) Not to mention that “court” is not involved here.
What’s left? All that could possibly be left is honoring an agreement to not reveal the provider of stolen materia to wikileaks. First we would have to ask: why. Who is being protected (can’t be someone who is already dead), and for what purpose — by someone already shown to be willing to publish others’ material that has no overriding public importance and/or was stolen.
But it was not that, not integrity to some source or contract because Assange “promised additional helpful information about the leaks in the near future” to Rep. Dana Rohrabacher. What does that mean.
The only reason I can think of to not have spilled the beans promptly when a clear higher public purpose would warrant it, would be self-interest (a teaser for a future publication, i.e. money, ego, and similar, or bullshit.) That is some kind of very relativistic “integrity”.
.
How about “nice family you have there….shame if something happened to them” as a motive?
EXACTLY!, that was on the burner, and is why the family was upset with that private investigator.
.
Oh please… Assange certainly could have provided a clear affirmative statement under oath along the lines of: on such and such date XYZ was provided to me by Undisclosed Person 1 who informed me that Undisclosed Person 2 obtained this information in the following manner… etc. and so forth.
“The Russians didn’t do it” is uninformative. The Martians also didn’t do it.
Sorry, nope. The “stay tuned for more” thing is self-promotion. Assange’s exposes of documents without journalistic summaries or analysis were not done for any greater good and given that some of his “leaks” potentially exposed our military personnel to bad things, I’m not buying that he’s worried about imagined threats to family members of a leaker.
.
.
He has two small boys. I’m not sure the power he had back then would have protected them and their mother from the US’ wrath had he spilled.
Even Flynn took the fall when they threatened his son.
Wonder when it’s going to dawn on Assange that he isn’t getting released to write a book, or sell info for money, etc and all this secrecy has been for naught, if your theory holds true.
Because WikiLeaks is based on the source remaining anonymous.
If Assamge reveals the source to save his own skin, the entire enterprise collapses.
Deep State called Assange’s bluff.
Assange’s source was Seth Rich. The DNC already had him taken care of.
That just eliminates the source and prevents a confession. Was Seth Rich the only source? Maybe he set up a deadman switch.
Assange has only implied Seth Rich was his source – after Rich was murdered.
For a while, Seth’s brother Aaron was tossed into the mix –
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2019/07/15/lawsuit-claims-julian-assange-confirmed-dnc-emails-received-from-seth-rich-not-a-russian-hack/
https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/14/media/seth-rich-lawsuit-settlement-ed-butowsky/index.html
Assange has never provided the documented proof of who provided the DNC emails. And the Swamp wants to make sure he never does.
Don’t you think Seth Rich was the source for Assange and they killed him? I am pretty sure Assange would be willing to publish his connection to the Seth Rich story and that is why he has been locked up.
Who killed him? The IT guys from Pakistan that Blabbermouth Schulz was letting hack Congressional computers? Who told them to kill Rich?
The CIA? Hillary’s friends? Because the leak was about Hillary and how they were cheating Bernie Sanders out of the nomination, as I recall. And Schulz was Head of the DNC, until she wasn’t anymore.
They say Assange endangered our National Security, but as a member of the press, he should be allowed his freedom to write the story. Rich was a true believer in a cause, but behaved like a corporate spy to the DNC. He might have committed a crime in their eyes, but he received the death penalty. I bet Brennan did it.
That means they are hiding the perp, like Brennan or maybe Obama or Hillary. by locking up Assange. They can’t defend their actions.
Who gets put in prison, without a trial ,for years in England or the United States?Assange.
This important thread of SR debacle helped me remember more. A higher up that SR protected?
Seth Rich was probably a source.
He may not have been the only source, or simply not worked alone.
Assange can most likely provide all the details.
A man in jail can talk with his attorney.
It collapsed anyway. When was the last time WikiLeaks was in the news.
Pretty sure that Assange built his entire business model around the promise that he, and Wikileaks, would never, ever, even upon pain of death, reveal their sources. That is why. He gives up one name, for any reason, all the work those previous whistleblowers have done will be for naught.
Should he come out of this alive, and vindicated, there will be no information off limits to him that silent individuals will present to Wikileaks.
It’s a pretty high standard to set up for oneself, but that is the answer to the ‘why?’ question.
.
Nope. There are ways to make an informative affirmative — and convincing — statement without disclosing the identities of a “confidential informant”. Assange instead did the cagey thing.
Moreover the bulk of his “business model” consisted of a vomitus spew of mostly useless crap that did not rise to the exalted level of “whistleblowing”, but which he cavalierly published without thought to consequences and without any particular interest in whether it could be harmful. His business model was to be sensationalistic.
.
Who’s dead.
Perhaps that’s why he’s still alive. Self preservation is a great motivator.
.
Explain how that would work, versus the threat of being shut up by being killed. Once the beans are spilled, no point in killing him. (You’re thinking of a different dynamic in which the person is under threat for an unrelated reason and uses the threat of disclosure if he’s killed as, essentially, a form of blackmail.)
.
^^^ That right there. IF he has the info he could have put the knife in the fourth branch EASILY. OR, he could have had a “dead man’s switch” through his organization to release whatever information he has.
This idea that he has the silver bullet sometimes doesn’t make sense, just on the basis of human nature. Assange is no super human in that regard. And, this “protecting the source” business also doesn’t make sense when there are ways around that.
How did that dead man switch work for Eipstain????
I vaguely remember a coded message released on maybe TOR?
I have many of the same questions as outhouse council.
However, I think Akindole is correct – Assange does not have a silver bullet. His life has been torn to pieces, yet he still maintains the “info” that could expose the Deep State? Assange had many chances to pass this info to friendly people in Trump’s orbit during the entire presidency.
Occam’s razor – this is the simplest explanation… but I hope we are wrong.
Seth Rich and his brother did the dead, end of story!!!!
They are all going to take the Fifth? One after the other? The entire Justice Department and the FBI are going to sit and take the Fifth on live tv? Must watch that one!
I especially want to see Bill Barr take the Fifth.
Yes…it’s employing their rights.
See how that works. Commit felonies for government, get charged, awarded probation, then get your law license back.
Confirm with that fellow Clinesmith.
Wolfe gets two months at Club Fed.
Comey, Clapper, and gang get a consultant slot on the propaganda shows.
THEY believe in what they’re doing regardless of the outcome.
Mike, do you know how humiliating and revealing it will be for these big shots to have to take the Fifth?
This is their propaganda game and they are caught. It is not just legal, it is the optics of their guilt.
You’re using 2D thinking against 3D lying. And guilt doesn’t matter to them. Each have their reasons for their actions
During Watergate hearings, I recall they got around that.
IIRC, after the prosecutors had built their cases, and had indictments, Congress subpoenaed the “conspirators” and gave them limited immunity for anything they testified to; so they couldn’t invoke the 5th,…BUT their testimony wouldn’t taint theit prosecutions,…and they COULD be charged with perjury, if they lied to Congress.
I THINK thats how it went down,…
One interesting thing to me is that the Russians know. They know there was no hacking, that the diplomats expelled were involved in no way. They also know it was an Obama cover-up of the claims of DNC hacking.
Another reason the Russians do not trust us and call us “The Empire of Lies”.
That they were effectively sabatoging any relationship between PDJT and Putin, which could have been used by PDJT in a geopolitical way against the CCP, was not just sacrificing it for political ends; the crowd involved in this is the same crowd that has pushed for the US vs Russia war in Ukraine.
Which they had been advancing for years, with NATO expansion, and put the final piece in place with Zalenski installation, in 2014, a Hillary/ McCain operation.
To add, putting the screws economically to the CCP is against the Uniparty making trillions off the China trade, hence the desire to thwart any such policies by Trump.
Yes think BIG all those billions
Our corrupt government knows that it will always win the waiting game, and Assange is doomed to be in perpetual legal limbo by design. The best thing that could happen from the deep state’s perspective is for Assange to die in custody, as he waits many years for his case to wend through the intentionally gridlocked process.
Assange is truly a political prisoner and as time passes, more and more people are recognizing this. Sadly I do not expect him to ever be freed. He holds the key to exposing all of it, and he is key to tracing all of this back to Obama’s unfettered illegal access to the NSA databases. Obama and Co. used this illicitly obtained private information to enrich themselves in countless ways and when Trump won and they realized the jig was up, absolute panic ensued. Assange, holding evidence that would blow this sky high, knows too much to ever be permitted to expose the conspiracy. His continued unlawful incarceration should infuriate all of us.
.
Assange had plenty of time while at the Ecuadorian embassy to spit out the information. And did not do it. Why didn’t he. He certainly was willing indiscriminately to publish all kinds of other stuff.
.
see my remarks above……
.
See my responses above. 🙂
.
It’s already exposed. Most of it, as I assume there could still be some aspects we don’t have knowledge of yet.
So why do they care, at this point? No one is being indicted or prosecuted for any of this.
They don’t get even a slap on the wrist. No one protests outside the homes of any of these people. They retain their illicit wealth.
Bring the sunlight, expose it all, accept that the greatest injustice certainly in my lifetime will go unpunished, and let’s get to dismantling the ability of any bad actors to do any of this again.
Wholesale repeal the Patriot Act, dismantle the CIA and FBI, clean out the DOJ and State Dept/National Security Council, consolidate the 17 “intelligence” agencies and severely restrict their missions, stop all forms of domestic surveillance, severely restrict public health powers, shutdown the Dept of Homeland Security, close the borders, ship the illegals out, and let’s take this country back.
It’s a start.
Julian Assange knows it all but it is all being suppressed by everyone, including the President. You have to ask if anyone can walk away from what is going on because everyone has something to hide. The only reason I think Assange is still alive is because if anything happened to him, he has arranged for everything to be released if he is killed or dies suddenly. I really hope he is freed soon.
.
And if he just spilled it all, there would be no reason to kill him. Too late. (Moreover, if he has OTHER information, spilling the DNC hack info would not diminish this other stuff as a “dead man’s switch”.
Frustrating. No one is thinking this through, preferring to view Assange as some kind of hero. Super. A hero who could have thwarted untold misery for the US by not being cagey.
.
Thank you so much Sundance for this essay! Fantastic!
I had looked through the Durham investigation looking for the DNC hacking, but found nothing. As was discussed here on TCTH that was the fulcrum of the whole Russia-Hoax, so I was surprised that there was nothing on this in the report. Your studies make perfect sense. Thank you so much!
Silos…compartments…sunlight can’t do its wonderful disinfecting when so many walls remain up, and doors closed.
As SD and many others have already noted, this is all by design.
Donald Russo
@donaldrusso994
99.99% of Americans won’t read the 306 page Durham Report. But I strongly recommend that everyone read at least pages 91-101 of the Durham Report. Takeaways:
Continue reading…
Yahtzee!!! Take these pages an post them. Curious minds will take care of the rest.
The narrative they are trying to push, with Weisemann report (Mueller) AND even more emphatically with the Durham report, is that this is all BECAUSE of a Clinton campaign “dirty trick” that ‘fooled’ the FBI.
“Blame it on Hillary”.
But, Hillary just commissioned the dossier, including getting it into the Public eye, as a manufactured “October surprise”; thats why it didn’t have any substance: it didn’t need any. It just had to survive in the public zietgiest, until the election.
Hillary had NOTHING to do with all of the activities Sundance outlines; Carter Page, Papa-D, Manafort and the black ledger, Misfud operation, Azra Turk,…ALL of that was a seperate I/C operation, to lay the predicate FOR Mueller, ‘in the unlikely event that Trump should win’ SO THAT having a Special Council hounding and leaking would (they hope) lead to perjury trap and/or Obstruction of Justice (for firing Mueller) NOT as criminal charges, but to Watergate him; tell him there were enough R Senate votes to convict, and for party and country to resign.
The “actives” being at the top of FBI and Justice, knee that “if things went South” that they could protect themselves fro Criminal charges, but,..
They needed a guarantee any Congressional investigations (Like Nunes) would be “bottled up” and so in addition to needing a green light from Obama admin, they needed a green light guarantee from McConnell and Ryan.
In addition, the whole plan, in 2016 and before DJT is even elected, dependedon an Impeachment, which HAS to start in the House, and for political optics and maintaining the illusion of a two party system, HAD to be initiated by DEMOCRATS.
And only ONE person, in 2016, could guarantee the House would flip in 2018; Paul Ryan.
And, we saw him make good on his guarantees given to Comey; he tied up Nunes, and encouraged 38 R’s in safe seats to retire.
Any investigation to “get to the bottom of it” is going to require the “actives” to finger not just Obama, but McConnell as well.
At that point, the Uniparty is finally exposed for all to see, and so can not be allowed.
The actives have been protected, or you could say they are blackmailing; its the nature of the original guarantee; only with involvement by both Obama AND McConnell, would they percieve it was “safe” for them to commit seditious treason.
Comey, Rosie, etc. rose to the top, in the swamp by always protecting themselves.
The only way they “rat” is by having them face 100+ counts of Conspiracy to Obstruct Justice in an ongoing Conspiracy (hence no Statute of limitations) effectively a life+50 years sentence.
IMHO, I just don’t think a Congressional investigation is going to find the truth, that Obama and Mitch both greenlighted this operation that had next to nothing to do with Hillary.
Two SEPERATE operstions; Hillary Oct. surprise dirty trick.
Intel op, to “pay the premiums” in case they needed to cash in on the “insurance policy”.
And all of the actions Sundance lists that Durham ignored, were those “premiums” and were ‘paid up’ by the intel agencies.
Hillary had nothing to do with that, but they are detirmined that history will say it was all a political dirty trick, gone bad.
None of the planning, execution or coerced coverup can happen on such a wide scale by sob l many actors without the CIA – Brennan.
Take them out of the equation at any point, and the house of cards fall.
Agree.
Not exactly. There is some overlap.
Hillary had other vested interests. Manning was sentenced May 2013. Obama commuted much of the 35 year sentence as he left office. Manning was released from prison May 2017.
In February 2019 Manning publicly disclosed that she had received a subpoena to testify before a grand jury. Although granted immunity, she refused to answer questions about WikiLeaks, and in March she was jailed for contempt of court. Manning was released upon the expiration of the grand jury’s term in May 2019, but she was served with another subpoena while she was still in custody. This raised the possibility of a second contempt finding, and Manning was, in fact, returned to jail just a week later. She remained incarcerated until March 2020, when Manning’s attorneys reported that she had attempted suicide. Manning was transferred to a hospital, and a judge ruled that she was no longer required to testify. In 2022 she released the memoir README.txt. (copied from Britannca.com)
Sundance’s primary point is about structurally implemented control over information flow. Russia-Trump false narrative is the most shocking as it casts a large shadow – was there a coup against a sitting President? Point being what else was being orchestrated and what are the interconnections.
HE, not she. Please don’t validate the insanity.
Lol!
Good point. In my defense, Para three is all lifted from Britannica.
I’ll share…errrr……a Yuengling over that one!
Good choice on the Yuengling!
And if Hillary is the type of person we know she is……will she sit back and let them put this on her? Or does she expose them to saver her ass and help catapult her chit daughter into the political limelight? Or, will it be the daughter who says, no, F-this, I’m a Clinton…..here you go.
What about William Binny and his pals? They proved the “hack” from Russia could not have happened and was, in fact, local. The Nation Magazine (of all things!) did a long-form report on what William Binny proved was a fact. That report has been scrubbed.
That’s William Binney…
This?
https://www.thenation.com/article/a-new-report-raises-big-questions-about-last-years-dnc-hack/
Use the internet time machine…
https://web.archive.org/web/20170810010422/https://www.thenation.com/article/a-new-report-raises-big-questions-about-last-years-dnc-hack/
Yes. Thank you. The web archive link you posted leads to what I remember reading after Seth Rich was murdered. The first link you posted leads to, “Oops! Page Not Found.”
From this link: https://web.archive.org/web/20170810010422/https://www.thenation.com/article/a-new-report-raises-big-questions-about-last-years-dnc-hack/
“There was no hack of the Democratic National Committee’s system on July 5 last year—not by the Russians, not by anyone else. Hard science now demonstrates it was a leak—a download executed locally with a memory key or a similarly portable data-storage device. In short, it was an inside job by someone with access to the DNC’s system. This casts serious doubt on the initial “hack,” as alleged, that led to the very consequential publication of a large store of documents on WikiLeaks last summer.”
I understand Swarthy’s concerns (below). All Leftists lie because the truth is not in them. But the very fact that The Nation publicized Mr. Binney’s findings at all is pretty amazing, isn’t it? At the time there were a scattered few blurbs about “William Binney” but they were all couched in terms of him being a nutball, over-the-hill, conspiracy theorist. Hell, he might be controlled opposition. This whole mess stinks to high heaven.
Seth Rich was murdered because he spilled the beans on Hillary…another Clinton roadkill. Is Julian Assange still alive? Is that a body-double of Assange in the picture of Assange being man-handled by that crowd of officers? Is bobby-officer in the foreground (with the checkered cap over his eyes) smirking because he knows this whole scene is a put-up job? These people are infinitely despicable.
The “It was a leak” conclusion is can be misleading. VIPS may well be correct that the Guccifer 2.0 “hack” of July 5, 2016 was a local download, i.e. perhaps within the DNC building itself. However, it should be understood that this is a DIFFERENT issue from that of the sources of the DNC and Podesta emails published by WikiLeaks. There’s (1) “it”, the July 5 “hack”, (2) “it”, the leaked or hacked DNC emails, and (3) “it”, the leaked or hacked Podesta emails – i.e. three different sets files that cannot be presumed to have the same origin. People need to stop thinking of “it” and instead be careful to talk about “them” in reference to these leaks or hacks.
According to Craig Murray, if one summarizes what he has actually said on the matter, (and ignoring fabrications by the Daily Mail falsely claiming that Murray was himself involved in a hand-off of files), there were two different American leakers to WikiLeaks. Murray did have a secret rendezvous with the second leaker, the Podesta leaker, in September 2016, but the purpose was “administrative” and the meeting occurred after the files were already in WikiLeaks’ possession. He has insinuated that this person was from NSA or at least someone with access to NSA databases, and has related the interest in Podesta to his (or Podesta’s brother’s) status as a registered agent of Saudi Arabia at the time. Murray has insinuated that the DNC emails, in contrast, came from an American DNC insider, and, like Assange, Murray has shown interest in the Seth Rich murder case. There were several good sources for Murray’s actual claims and I’ve generally lost track. But the best single one is Murray’s interview with Scott Horton (now available on Scott Horton Show Youtube) in December 2016.
(The actual quotations of Murray in the famous Daily Mail article are consistent with what Murray has said everywhere else, but the article’s major claim -repeated half a dozen times within it – is consistent with NOTHING Murray is on record as having said anywhere, supported by no actual quote from Murray, and strongly denied by Murray.)
The third party interpretations in that The Nation article went beyond the original research (by Forensicator) and made some questionable claims that the original author disagreed with. It’s safer to stick with the evidence Forensicator exposed.
These people used the machinery of government to first attack their political opposition and then to depose a president. That is a coup, which is treason. That they did not completely succeed is immaterial.
This is intolerable. They must be prosecuted.
Way off topic for this thread
Sundance, I think there is a typo in fifth from last paragraph, “The all know.” I think you meant to say “They all know.”
Thanks Veg…
DOJ produced attribution allegations of GRU activity (with attribution never demonstrated) based on allegations of GRU asset control (that were never demonstrated) based on allegations of GRU bitcoin pool control (that was never demonstrated).
Quite simply, attribution was never demonstrated. They didn’t even disclose how determinations were made in most cases where they cited the names of GRU officers.
Mueller also told us that the DNC’s mail server was hacked between May 25 and June 1, 2016 but a quarter of the DNC emails were already exported two days prior to this period and the DOJ hasn’t accounted for this activity at all.
Not only have they failed to demonstrate their allegations, they’ve missed or covered-up the initial DNC email exfiltration activity.
Personal civil court proceedings might also be in order against these character assassins; or worse. God have mercy on their souls.
These people ruined so many lives with this fake made up “dossier’ Someone should tweet this to Wikileaks
Tweets by wikileaks
If you care about press freedom, make some noise about Julian Assange
The US justice department has acted appallingly in the Assange case. If he can be prosecuted, so can journalists everywhere
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2023/may/04/julian-assange-us-justice-department-wikileaks
It was obvious from the beginning that the story about the DNC hack was preposterous.
“On the evening of July 5, 2016, 1,976 megabytes of data were downloaded from the DNC’s server. The operation took 87 seconds. This yields a transfer rate of 22.7 megabytes per second. These statistics are matters of record and essential to disproving the hack theory.“
It was impossible for a Russian, or anyone else for that matter, to hack the DNC server. Because the transfer rate was too high for an Internet connection, someone had to plug a thumb drive into the server.
Washington is intent on answering questions that miss-lead.
Please please, please. Congressman Jim Jordan!
Follow Sundance’s outline and have these characters answer, who is Seth Rich and why is his computer in a FIB Silo? Why is he dead?
The false constructs just make my blood boil.
The FIB didn’t take possession of the DNC server so they didn’t have to see the lie the “DNC contractor”, Crowdstrike, was telling about the “hack”.
How can the impeachment of a president be founded on the word of a contractor for the DNC? While, while, while, republicans were supposedly in control?
It felt very Alice in Wonderland while happening and as though Through the Looking Glass. It laid bare the intent of the Uniparty..
President Trump’s impeachments were about fake Ukrainian Quid Pro Quo and J6 Fedsurection, not Russia.
Sorry for the failed old memory and poor phrasing. The beginning of the cascade that led to impeachment was PDJT calling for someone to “find” Hillary’s lost emails. The “Russians”, in the form of fake hacking group, answered that call.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/jul/13/russia-indictments-latest-news-hacking-dnc-charges-trump-department-justice-rod-rosenstein
I have had to correct quite a few lately on this same issue.
Actually the cascade started the day he took office, for no particular reason and every reason they could fantasize.
However, after all the Russia demonization and election interference lies they could find nothing on him, so in 2019, after Lyin’ Ryan gave the Ds the House, they decided to go for it over a perfect phone call with Mr. Z, the newly USA installed porn king.
It was about a fake whistleblower relaying hearsay and a perfect call. They called it quid pro quo and tried impeaching him for it with silly policy disputes. He released the transcript proving they lied.
Hint: He’s the President. He sets the policy.
Nan-Xi drug her feet on it as long as she could, because they had nothing, but then shifted into high gear when she knew they would soon be shutting the nation down in a plandemic lockdown. Then she expected the Rs in the Senate to investigate for the House and they said no dice. Case over.
I don’t read the Guardian. It’s trash. Besides, that is from 2018.
The Guardian proves our point but from the liberal perspective. Always good to understand the mind of the enemy..
Seth Rich was the DNC leaker. Even Inspector Clouseau could have figured this out quickly.
It looks like Sundance has triggered another cleanup op, More stuff is disappearing
And so you (SD) did it!
You released the whole thing over the last week.
Everyone should consider ‘warehousing’ all of the articles SD has released concerning the Durham report, starting with the approximately 4 last week concerning and 3 today dealing with the same issue in case ‘something’ happens to SD and CTH.
Most all that matters is out there to see and use.
Thanks for your unparalleled efforts, SD, the unmatchable subject matter expert anywhere!!!!!!!
everyone knows seth rich and julian assange are at the bottom of the dnc hack. likley assassins include fbi, cia, or clinton inc.
I also believe that the faked Russia DNC hack was never touched because of their final insurance policy, laid on 6 Jan 2017, 4 years before the date they would fully activate it if all else failed.
This insurance policy would insure the federal theft of America’s Elections and criminalize anyone who believed otherwise, setting them up for the next big hijack of our gubt, J6, The Big Lie.
It insured they could spy on Americans who supported President Trump for another 4 years, unimpeded, lock them up, bankrupt them and throw away the keys.
It insured that they could begin their dis-, mis-, and mal-information crusade to silence and cancel people who spoke out against them in any way, for any thing, through the creation of their new gubt mobsters, CISA.
This insurance policy was laid by DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson:
https://www.dhs.gov/news/2017/01/06/statement-secretary-johnson-designation-election-infrastructure-critical
Keep in mind that the DNC hack was also the perfect ruse to allow other gubts to claim Russian interference and to do the same, crack down on social media they did not like, their wet dream for decades.
The social media companies were only too happy to oblige in these crackdowns as it gave them the excuse and impetus they had wanted all along to have these countries dictate their ToS to the social media companies for their countries. These were their rewards for participating in the coup.
It would also set them up for the 2020 coup already in the making.
Two Laine:
‘Nuff Said,
Gotcha.
God be with us.(?)
Hammersdad
Critical detail. What is so alarming is how poorly served President Trump was by most of the people around him. Even more alarming is how little they care for the interests of the nation. I wonder if they avoid mirrors. The facts surrounding the execution style murder of the DNC operative who passed the thumb drive to Assange were also ignored by Durham.
Their (‘they’) interests are not the same as our (We the People) interests.
In addition, they are being used, willingly or unwillingly, to advance the interests of another entity.
sundance, tell us what you think would happen to a reporter and a leaker that would disclose all the IC knows about the dnc hack and related incidents.
Assange hinted that Seth Rich was murdered for leaking the DNC emails in this interview:
The US media ignored it.
It was plenty clear back in 2017:
https://100percentfedup.com/breaking-wikileaks-bombshell-murdered-dnc-staffer-seth-rich-dnc-leaker-whistleblower/
and Seth’s parents told Hannity to shut up about it. Ideology uber alles.
Or threatened.
I think they have another son that is still alive.
Aaron. He was actually implicated for a while –
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2019/07/15/lawsuit-claims-julian-assange-confirmed-dnc-emails-received-from-seth-rich-not-a-russian-hack/
https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/14/media/seth-rich-lawsuit-settlement-ed-butowsky/index.html
Ellen Ratner’s brother Michael was Assange’s attorney. She said this on November 9, 2016:
“I spent three hours with Julian Assange on Saturday at the Ecuadorian embassy in London,” she volunteered to the other guest, former New York Congressman John LeBoutillier One of the things he did say is that the leaks were not from the Russians. They were an internal source from the Hillary campaign or from somebody that knew Hillary, an enemy,” Ratner said. “And he does not think they’re from Russians, and he said Russia got credit for something WikiLeaks should have gotten credit for.”
https://www.thepostemail.com/2019/07/21/breaking-butowsky-attorney-tweets-video-of-ellen-ratner-on-meeting-with-julian-assange/
At 1:02:13
I read that Jim Jordan is going to open an investigation. Let’s hope and pray that the right questions get asked. Sundance. Is there any way to relay your research to Jim Jordan and suggest questions to be answered?
That makes me wonder if this would work: I print out all of this material and hand-deliver it to my Congressman. I tell him to be like Jim (Jimbo) Traficant and get this into the Congressional record. Read it on the floor even if he does it at one of those 99% vacant sessions. I also give him the link to this website.
He’s in a very safe conservative district, but if the conservatives in his district knew he had this information and didn’t share it publicly, they may think he’s not really that conservative. Or maybe not MAGA. He’s a nice guy as far as I know, but we don’t need “nice guys” right now.
Why do I have the feeling they already know what questions need to be answered which will be carefully culled during any public hearings? They will ask questions that eat around the edges without ever getting to the center of things.
The citizens of this country must not be controlled .
We must be uncontrollable.
I am advocating Self defense.
No Vax. No Bud. No FOX. No Disney. No Target.
Shut them down. ⚔️
No hesitation on who and what we support.
No waffling.
No excuses.
These evil people 👿(corporate administrative entities) who destroy and control are now revealed.
God bless all of you who Stand Tall! 🙏
I stand with you brothers and sisters of America!
💕🇺🇸🙏🇺🇸💕
Load and lock
One must still unlock to fire.
That may sum up the public Discourse on Readiness. I certainly do hope so.
The Russiagate ‘sliding door’ moment.
3) Therefore, Hillary gets away with Seth Rich’s Gangland Murder.
So far…
Habakkuk 2
12 “Woe to him who builds a town with bloodshed
and establishes a city on iniquity!”
13 Is it not from the Lord of Hosts
that the people labor to feed fire,
and the nations weary themselves for nothing?
14 For the earth will be filled with the knowledge of the glory of the Lord,
as the waters cover the seas.
Yes, Lord Jesus!
The Gipper Lives:
Habakuk was always one my of my departed (hopefully sainted) mother’s Holy Texts – if only – perhaps – for its shortness (and rather desperate) politicization.
I understand and do so pray.
Hmmersdad
Indeed we do; indeed we know.
Great job pulling this all together…
Yah, seemed so strange nothing was said about Mifsud, Halper, Turk, Veselnitskaya, Downer by Durham… now we know.
Pompeo knew too… fascinating.
Seth Rich killed the predicate.
Julian Assange liked the predicate.
Why did we never hear more from Dana Rohrabacher? He had to know. 3 hours was a long time.
I remember when Natalia Veselnitskaya blocked me on Twitter years ago, suggested that she was CIA … seemed weird at the time… looks like that was close to true too…
Always knew (intuitively) that the CIA laid breadcrumbs for the 5 eyes to find and the FBI to follow.
And with the Russia hoax being “international”, albeit in name only, you knew the CIA was behind it and involved too.
They did it as Susan Rice said “by the book”.
Thank you, thank you, thank you.
I just made a similar comment upthread. And have done so here on this site multiple times.
I agree with everything you stated and go further- at any point, without CIA assistance, manipulation, encouragement and/or coercion, the whole thing falls apart- Brennan!
Doesn’t matter who planned, encouraged, ordered or assisted, without the CIA – NOTHING HAPPENS!!
And they are the very ones involved with Kennedy, Nixon, Ford, Reagan thru Bush, Clinton, Bush I/II & Obama.
Eisenhower warned and Kennedy attempted.
The common thread for 70 years!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
EVERYONE else is a willing participant or coerced, no exceptions at any level of government except ONE – TRUMP.
Honorable mention – Ron Paul
Thank you sundance. I am archiving this series for my son to read when he is older.
Related note. Have you noticed that ever since crowdstrike provided the dirty deed coverup they have since gone public and their revenues have doubled ever single year? It sure pays to play in the deep end of the swamp.
Sean Henry is currently worth about 150 million dollars.
There is another under the radar issue that intersects with all of this. The same Susan Rice who tried to cover for Bengahzi and for Obama’s involvement in the Russia hoax announced on the day Tucker was sidelined that she was leaving the Biden administration this Friday. Why has she been in charge of domestic policy for the last 2.5 years? Who really made the border, energy, trade, voter fraud, turn over health emergencies to WHO, etc decisions? She is much more than a rat deserting a sinking ship. More like a mutineer escaping on a life boat after lighting the fuse that will sink the ship.
Military Tribunal’s.
Finding justice in the Legislative, Judicial or Executive branches of our captured government is as likely as the angels of God finding 10 righteous people in Sodom and Gomorrah.
Genesis 18:32: “If I can find Ten righteous people In Sodom and Gomorrah will you spare the cities?”
Also I noticed, with my new sensitive woke eyes, that that rogue’s gallery of criminals not a person of color or a woman or a woman wannabe, that in our present existence of wokeism, displays latent racism, sexism and homophobia don’t you think?
It always bothered me that President Trump wouldn’t mettle in Assange. It shows the grave concern the coup had for this guy. They had Trump under a little control because he was a newby. Surprised Assange is still alive.
his name was Seth Rich
Chinless cocaine mitch told Trump not to pardon Assange, and if he did chinless would support the second impeachment, that also applied to Snowdon
aim4truth.org Doug Gaberal and Michael McKibben lay this out also.. The Brits are the bad guys also
John Durham is a coward and a traitor to the American people as much or more than any of the other crooks in the Deep State. He was tasked to get at the truth (not half of the truth) or that’s what we were told. He thinks he can sleep like a baby now that he hasn’t indicted anyone for their crimes. What was the USE OF HIS report?!! I guess the crooks picked a LAWYER who is used to doing a half-azzed job. He hasn’t even told the whole truth.
John Durham, May your fleas from the dogs you laid down with keep you up every night!! Poor excuse of a man!!
Not surprising at all, to anyone who truly follows government. There exists an ongoing “evil enterprise “, in any Central Government, that simply serves the desires of a few for power and control.
Look no further back than the botched Mena investigations of the late 80’s and early 90’s, that protected the interests and enrichment of the Clintons and Bush’s.
Thousands died or lives became useless as a result of the CIA drug smuggling operation that grew out of a desire to help over-throw small, communist foreign government. The truth was quashed by IRS and DOJ, just as it is being quashed again now against whistleblowers.
Just how involved was/is Mike Pomeo? He tries very hard to portray himself as a moral, righteous, and honorable man but something about him stinks to high heaven, IMO. Me thinks he’s like Julius Caesar which Mark Anthony eulogized as being an “AMBITIOUS MAN”. I figure that Pompeo is as “ambitious” as a man can get! He is probably even more ambitious than Nikki Haley and DeSantis but much more cunning and therefore more dangerous.
Alumni of West Point notorious class of ‘85. Research his fellow class alumni and the proverbial ‘blood oath’ they vowed together.
Sickening
His name was Seth Rich. He was a Bernie supporter and upset that the DNC cheated Bernie out of the Democrat nomination so he leaked the emails to Julian. The DNC had him killed because of it. These people are evil.
As I got deeper into this post, I kept saying to myself ~ Seth Rich. Too bad Seth is not on earth to tell his story. I wonder what he knew?
I see some light. If you are on the wrong side of this it might be a train.
SD summed it all up after President Trump’s surprise election to the White House: “There are billions at stake!”
The root of all evil 👿!
In a nutshell traitors and criminals are running all four branches of our government and all its agencies. Knowing that should remove all confusion.
Jrod: Agreed.
So was it the undercover ATF…or DEA agent…that put two in Seth Rich?
Wow, Sundance, just Wow! Unfu**ingbelievable Wow! You rank up there with our Founding Father’s for the Duty and Honor and Sacrifice you are making. The ride you take us on is like being on a carnival ride that has roller coaster effects while twisting on a horizontal axis and spinning on the vertical! Life is stranger than fiction and the players in this, those with malevolent goals of power, money, greed and unrestrained thirst for control must be brought to heel and dealt with in the harshest means possible. Thank you. I am trying to spread your work but you can’t make the horse drink, if you know what I mean. God bless you and God bless America and the People of our Country. The Ideals of the Constitution and Bill of Rights are worth fighting for and the Evil roaming the earth will not sit idle. It is many fold and must be defeated with the Lord’s blessings.
Odds are that Assange will either rot in prison or be eliminated by the CIA.
Unless he has multiple ways of publishing the information he has in order to keep the CIA wolves at bay, he’s a dead man.
I’m guessing he’ll never go to trial but if he ever does, the US will give him the J6 treatment.
It is interesting, if “there was extensive pre-2016 election evidence of an FBI/CIA counterintelligence operation that also involved U.K. intelligence services. “, against whom was it being perpetrated? ….it is understood now, thanks to the author, that the operation was/is against We the People.