The Weissmann/Mueller report contains claims that Russia hacked the DNC servers as the central element to the Russia interference narrative in the U.S. election. This DNC hack claim is the fulcrum issue structurally underpinning the Russian election interference narrative pushed by the Weissmann and Muller Special Counsel. However, this essential claim is directly disputed by WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, as outlined during a Dana Rohrabacher interview and by Julian Assange’s own on-the-record statements.
Assange was arrested at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London immediately after the Weissmann/Muller report was released to Bill Barr. Despite investigating the background of the Trump-Russia nonsense, John Durham never touched the DNC hacking claim – the core of the Mueller report. Why? Because Durham knew the U.S. Government threw a bag over Assange to protect the fraudulent Trump-Russia and Russian interference claims.
Again, this reality speaks to the corruption within the John Durham investigation. Durham was protecting Weissmann, Mueller and the core of their justification for a 2-year investigation. Durham knows why Assange was arrested. Durham stayed away from it, intentionally.
The Russians HAD TO have made efforts to interfere in the election, or else the factual basis for the surveillance operation against candidate Donald Trump is naked to the world.
That’s why so much DOJ, FBI and Mueller special counsel energy was exhausted framing the predicate.
“Seventeen intelligence agencies,” the December 29th Joint Analysis Report, the expulsion of the Russian diplomats which was an outcropping of the JAR, the rushed January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment, shoving microphones in everyone’s faces and demanding they answer if they believed Russia interfered – all of it, and I do mean every bit of it, is predicated on an absolute DC need to establish that Russia Attempted to Interfere in the 2016 election.
The “Russian Malicious Cyber Activity – Joint Analysis Report” (full pdf) is pure nonsense. It outlines nothing more than vague and disingenuous typical hacking activity that is no more substantive than any other hacking report on any other foreign actor. However, it was needed to help frame the Russian interference narrative.
There were no Russian diplomats involved; there was no Russian election interference; there was no Russian hacking of the DNC; it was all a fraud created by the intelligence community (IC), FBI and Main Justice to support Hillary Clinton’s lies and then cover their own targeting tracks.
On September 26, 2021, Yahoo News published an extensive article about the CIA targeting WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange in 2017 and the extreme conversations that were taking place at the highest levels of the U.S. government about how to control him.
There is a much bigger story transparently obvious when overlapped with CTH research files on the Mueller investigation and the U.S. intelligence community. Specifically, the motive intentionally not outlined by Yahoo News.
What I am going to share is a deep dive using the resources and timeline from within that Yahoo article and the specific details we have assembled that paints a clear picture about what interests existed for the Deep State, the Intelligence apparatus and the Mueller-Weissmann special counsel.
This fully cited review is not for the faint of heart. This is a journey that could shock many; it could alarm more and will likely force more than a few to reevaluate just what the purpose was for Mike Pompeo within the Donald Trump administration.
As the Yahoo News article begins, they outline how those within the Trump administration viewed Assange as a risk in 2017.
Here it is critical to accept that many people inside the Trump administration were there to control events, not to facilitate a policy agenda from a political outsider. In the example of Assange, the information he carried was a risk to those who attempted and failed to stop Trump from winning the 2016 election.
Julian Assange was not a threat to Donald Trump, but he was a threat to those who attempted to stop Donald Trump. In 2017, the DC system was reacting to a presidency they did not control. As an outcome, the Office of the President was being managed and influenced by some with ulterior motives.
Yahoo, via Michael Isikoff, puts it this way: “Some senior officials inside the CIA and the Trump administration even discussed killing Assange, going so far as to request “sketches” or “options” for how to assassinate him. Discussions over kidnapping or killing Assange occurred “at the highest levels” of the Trump administration, said a former senior counterintelligence official. “There seemed to be no boundaries.”
As we overlay the timeline, it is prudent to pause and remember some hindsight details. According to reports in November of 2019, U.S. Attorney John Durham and U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr were spending time looking carefully at CIA activity in the 2016 presidential election. One quote from a media-voice increasingly sympathetic to a political deep-state noted:
“One British official with knowledge of Barr’s wish list presented to London commented that, “It is like nothing we have come across before, they are basically asking, in quite robust terms, for help in doing a hatchet job on their own intelligence services”“. (Link)
It is interesting that quote came from a British intelligence official, as there was extensive pre-2016 election evidence of an FBI/CIA counterintelligence operation that also involved U.K. intelligence services. There was an aspect to the FBI/CIA operation that overlaps with both a U.S. and U.K. need to keep Wikileaks founder Julian Assange under tight control.
To understand the risk that Julian Assange represented to FBI/CIA interests, and effectively the Mueller special counsel, it is important to understand just how extensive the operations of the FBI/CIA were in 2016. It is within this network of foreign and domestic operations where FBI Agent Peter Strzok was clearly working as a bridge between the CIA and FBI operations.
By now, people are familiar with the construct of CIA operations involving Joseph Mifsud, a Maltese professor generally identified as a western intelligence operative who was tasked by the FBI/CIA to run an operation against Trump campaign official George Papadopoulos in both Italy (Rome) and London. {Go Deep} John Durham ignored him.
In a similar fashion, the FBI tasked U.S. intelligence asset Stefan Halper to target another Trump campaign official, Carter Page. Under the auspices of being a Cambridge Professor, Stefan Halper also targeted General Michael Flynn. Additionally, using assistance from a female FBI agent, under the false name Azra Turk, Halper also targeted Papadopoulos. Again, John Durham ignored it.
The initial operations to target Flynn, Papadopoulos and Page were all based overseas. This seemingly makes the CIA exploitation of the assets and the targets legal and much easier. If Durham went into this intelligence rabbit hole, there would be a paper trail that leads back to Robert Mueller. Durham didn’t go there.
John Durham and IG Michael Horowitz both outlined how very specific exculpatory evidence was known to the FBI and Main Justice, yet that evidence was withheld from the FISA application used against Carter Page and/or it was ignored. The FBI fabricated information in the FISA and removed evidence that Carter Page was previously working for the CIA. This is what FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith was indicted and convicted for doing.
One week after the FBI and DOJ filed the second renewal for the Carter Page FISA [April 7, 2017], Yahoo News notes how Mike Pompeo delivered his first remarks as CIA Director:
[…] On April 13, 2017, wearing a U.S. flag pin on the left lapel of his dark gray suit, Pompeo strode to the podium at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), a Washington think tank, to deliver to a standing-room-only crowd his first public remarks as Trump’s CIA director.
Rather than use the platform to give an overview of global challenges or to lay out any bureaucratic changes he was planning to make at the agency, Pompeo devoted much of his speech to the threat posed by WikiLeaks. (link)
Why would CIA Director Mike Pompeo be so concerned about Julian Assange and Wikileaks in April 2017?
In April of 2017 Pompeo’s boss, President Donald Trump, was under assault from the intelligence community writ large, and every deep state actor was leaking to the media in a frenzied effort to continue the Trump-Russia collusion conspiracy.
The Trump-Russia effort was so all consuming that FBI Director James Comey was even keeping a diary of engagement with President Trump in order to support an ongoing investigation built on fraud – yet, Mike Pompeo is worried about Julian Assange.
Again, here it is important to put yourself back into the time of reference. Remember, it’s clear in the text messages between FBI Agent Strzok and Lisa Page that Peter Strzok had a working relationship with what he called their “sister agency”, the CIA.
♦ Former CIA Director John Brennan admitted Peter Strzok helped write the January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) which outlines the Russia narrative; and it was also Peter Strzok who authored the July 31st, 2016, “Electronic Communication” from the CIA to the FBI that originated FBI operation “Crossfire Hurricane.” Strzok immediately used that EC to travel to London to debrief intelligence officials around Australian Ambassador to the U.K. Alexander Downer.
In short, Peter Strzok was a profoundly overzealous James Bond wannabe who acted as a bridge between the CIA and the FBI. The perfect type of FBI career agent for 2016’s CIA Director John Brennan to utilize.
Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson hired CIA Open-Source analyst Nellie Ohr toward the end of 2015, at appropriately the same time as “FBI Contractors” were identified exploiting the NSA database and extracting information on a specific set of U.S. persons. One, if not the primary extractors, has now been identified as Rodney Joffe at Neustar. “The campaign plot was outlined by Durham in a 27-page indictment charging former Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann with making a false report to the FBI. The plot was also outlined in the finished Durham report. Eight individuals who allegedly conspired with Sussmann but does not identify them by name. The sources familiar with the probe confirmed that the leader of the team of contractors was Rodney L. Joffe.” {Go Deep}
It was also Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson who was domestically tasked with a Russian lobbyist named Natalia Veselnitskaya. A little reported Russian Deputy Attorney General named Saak Albertovich Karapetyan was working as a double agent for the CIA and Kremlin. Karapetyan was directing the foreign operations of Natalia Veselnitskaya, and Glenn Simpson was organizing her inside the U.S as part of his Trump-Russia creation.
Glenn Simpson managed Veselnitskaya through the 2016 Trump Tower meeting with Donald Trump Jr. However, once the CIA/Fusion GPS operation using Veselnitskaya started to unravel with public reporting, back in Russia Deputy AG Karapetyan died in a helicopter crash.
Simultaneously timed in late 2015 through mid 2016, there was a domestic FBI operation using a young Russian named Maria Butina tasked to run up against Republican presidential candidates. According to Patrick Byrne, Butina’s handler, was FBI agent Peter Strzok who was giving Byrne the instructions on where to send her. {Go Deep}
All of this context outlines the extent to which the FBI/CIA was openly involved in constructing a political operation that settled upon anyone in candidate Donald Trump’s orbit. A large international operation directed by the FBI/CIA and domestic operations seemingly directed by Peter Strzok operating with a foot in both agencies. [Strzok gets CIA service coin] Durham eviscerated the predicate for all of this in his report, yet stayed away from the part that leads to Robert Mueller in 2017.
Recap: ♦Mifsud tasked against Papadopoulos (CIA). ♦Halper tasked against Flynn (CIA), Page (CIA) and Papadopoulos (CIA). ♦Azra Turk, pretending to be Halper asst, tasked against Papadopoulos (FBI). ♦Veselnitskaya tasked against Donald Trump Jr. (CIA, Fusion GPS). ♦Butina tasked against Trump and Donald Trump Jr (FBI).
Additionally, Christopher Steele was a British intelligence officer hired by Fusion GPS to assemble and launder fraudulent intelligence information within his dossier. And we cannot forget Oleg Deripaska, a Russian oligarch, who was recruited by Asst. FBI Director Andrew McCabe to participate in running an operation against the Trump campaign and create the impression of Russian involvement. Deripaska refused to participate.
All of this engagement directly controlled by U.S. intelligence, and all of this intended to give a specific Russia impression. This predicate was what John Durham was reviewing in November of 2019, and then released in his final report – while whitewashing the parts that led to the Mueller silo.
The key point of all that contextual background is to see how committed the CIA and FBI were to the constructed narrative of Russia interfering with the 2016 election. The CIA, FBI, and by extension the DOJ and a multitude of political operatives, put a hell of a lot of work into it.
We know John Durham looked at the construct of the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA); and talking to CIA analysts who participated in the construct of the January 2017 report that bolstered the false appearance of Russian interference in the 2016 election. This context is important, because it ties in to the next part that involves Julian Assange and Wikileaks. This is where the motives of Mike Pompeo in mid/late 2017 come into play.
[…] By the summer of 2017, the CIA’s proposals were setting off alarm bells at the National Security Council. “WikiLeaks was a complete obsession of Pompeo’s,” said a former Trump administration national security official. (link)
On April 11th, 2019, the Julian Assange indictment was unsealed in the Eastern District of Virginia (EDVA). From the indictment we discover it was under seal since March 6th, 2018:
On Tuesday April 15, 2019, more investigative material was released. Again, note the dates: Grand Jury, *December of 2017* This means FBI investigation prior to….
The FBI investigation took place prior to December 2017, it was coordinated through the Eastern District of Virginia (EDVA) where Dana Boente was U.S. Attorney at the time. The grand jury indictment was sealed from March of 2018 until after Mueller completed his investigation, April 2019.
Why the delay?
What exactly was the DOJ waiting for from March 2018 to April 2019?
This timeframe is the peak of the Robert Mueller/Andrew Weissmann special counsel investigation.
Here’s where it gets interesting….
The Yahoo article outlines, “There was an inappropriate level of attention to Assange“, by the CIA according to a national security council official. However, if you consider the larger ramifications of what Julian Assange represented to all of those people inside and outside government interests who created the Trump-Russia collusion/conspiracy, well, there was actually a serious risk.
Remember, in May 2017 Robert Mueller and Andrew Weissmann effectively took over the DOJ. The purpose of the Mueller investigation was to cover up the illegal operation that took place in the preceding year. The people exposed in the Trump-Russia targeting operation included all of those intelligence operatives previously outlined in the CIA, FBI and DOJ operations. These are the people John Durham did not indict.
The FBI submission to the Eastern District of Virginia Grand Jury in December of 2017 was four months after congressman Dana Rohrabacher talked to Julian Assange in August of 2017: “Assange told a U.S. congressman … he can prove the leaked Democratic Party documents … did not come from Russia.”
(August 2017, The Hill Via John Solomon) Julian Assange told a U.S. congressman on Tuesday he can prove the leaked Democratic Party documents he published during last year’s election did not come from Russia and promised additional helpful information about the leaks in the near future.
Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, a California Republican who is friendly to Russia and chairs an important House subcommittee on Eurasia policy, became the first American congressman to meet with Assange during a three-hour private gathering at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, where the WikiLeaks founder has been holed up for years.
Rohrabacher recounted his conversation with Assange to The Hill.
“Our three-hour meeting covered a wide array of issues, including the WikiLeaks exposure of the DNC [Democratic National Committee] emails during last year’s presidential election,” Rohrabacher said, “Julian emphatically stated that the Russians were not involved in the hacking or disclosure of those emails.”
Pressed for more detail on the source of the documents, Rohrabacher said he had information to share privately with President Trump. (read more)
Dana Rohrabacher later published this account of the events:
Knowing how much effort the CIA and FBI put into the Russia collusion-conspiracy narrative; and knowing that Assange could essentially destroy the baseline predicate for the entire Trump-Russia investigation – which included the use of Robert Mueller; it would make sense for corrupt government officials to take keen interest after this August 2017 meeting between Rohrabacher and Assange.
That contact between Rohrabacher and Assange explains why those same government officials would quickly gather specific evidence (related to Wikileaks and Bradley Manning) for a grand jury by December 2017.
Within three months of the grand jury seating (Nov/Dec 2017), the DOJ generated an indictment and sealed it in March 2018.
The EDVA then sat on the Julian Assange indictment while the Mueller/Weissman probe was ongoing.
As soon as the Mueller probe ended, on April 11th, 2019, a planned and coordinated effort between the U.K. and U.S. was executed; Julian Assange was forcibly arrested and removed from the Ecuadorian embassy in London, and the EDVA indictment was unsealed (link).
As a person who researched this fiasco, including the ridiculously false 2016 Russian hacking/interference narrative: “17 intelligence agencies”, Joint Analysis Report (JAR) needed for Obama’s anti-Russia narrative in December ’16, and then a month later the ridiculously political Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) in January ’17, this timing against Assange is not coincidental.
It doesn’t take a deep researcher to see the aligned Deep State motive to control Julian Assange, because the Mueller report was dependent on Russia cybercrimes, and that narrative is contingent on the Russia DNC hack story which Julian Assange disputes. Again, John Durham stayed away from it!
♦ This is critical. The Weissmann/Mueller report contains claims that Russia hacked the DNC servers as the central element to the Russia interference narrative in the U.S. election.
This claim is the fulcrum underpinning the Russia election interference narrative. However, this core and essential claim is directly disputed by Julian Assange, as outlined during the Dana Rohrabacher interview, and by Julian Assange’s on-the-record statements.
The predicate for Robert Mueller’s investigation was specifically due to Russian interference in the 2016 election.
The fulcrum for this Russia interference claim is the intelligence community assessment (Peter Strzok); and the only factual evidence claimed within the ICA is that Russia hacked the DNC servers; a claim only made possible by relying on forensic computer analysis from another Michael Sussmann partner, Shawn Henry at Crowdstrike, yes another DNC contractor and collaborator with the Clinton campaign.
The CIA held a massive conflict of self-interest problem surrounding the Russian hacking claim as it pertained to their own activity in 2016. The FBI and DOJ always held a massive interest in maintaining the Russian hacking claim. Robert Mueller and Andrew Weismann did everything they could to support that predicate; and all of those foreign countries whose intelligence apparatus participated with Brennan and Strzok also carried a self-interest in maintaining that Russia hacking and interference narrative.
Julian Assange was/is the only person with direct knowledge of how Wikileaks gained custody of the DNC emails; and Assange claimed he has evidence it was from an inside DNC leak, not from a DNC hack.
The Russian “hacking” claim was ultimately so important to the CIA, FBI, DOJ, ODNI and U.K Intelligence apparatus. Well, right there is the obvious motive to shut Assange down as soon as intelligence officials knew the Mueller report was going to be public. And that is exactly what Main Justice and the U.S. intelligence community did.
This is why John Durham never touched it.
All of them know what happened.
All of them know why Julian Assange was taken from the Embassy in London. A bag had to be thrown over Assange in order to retain the justification for the Weissmann/Mueller special counsel and the larger Russian election interference claims. None of them do not know this. They all know.
Put the panel of Barr, Rosenstein, Horowitz, Mueller, Weissmann, Durham and Wray in front of congress. Ask each one: “Who is Seth Rich?”
Then start asking the right questions about the timeline of Assange being arrested. Ask them about the DNC hack and Russian provenance according to Crowdstrike. Ask them key and specific questions about the FBI working with Crowdstrike and about the DOJ and EDVA case against Assange. Watch them squirm.
They all know what happened. SO DO WE!
Ask them questions about it in public. Watch them squirm.
They would just answer every question with “The answer to that question is confidential and considered a national security risk.” You know, the built in cover up for government actor crimes.
Regarding: “Who is Seth Rich?”
A man killed by the CIA/FBI. Assange knows who specifically. My guess: Petery boy himself. He is the James Bond wannabe after all.
There are no innocents in this story.
Trump is, but he’s the only one.
Trump joked of gold diggers being such immoral users that you could just …. (if you wanted)
the cabal – Obama, Rice, Brennen, Comey, and GCHQ etc … they grabbed America by its Constitution and Insurrected it.
They won’t squirm knowing the Team system never prosecutes itself. That’s the purpose of being a party member, just like in the USSR… you risk very little when elections are a formality and your obvious crimes and manipulations will never land you in prison. And the R Team never makes examples of the Ds due to some level of quid pro quo going on.
I have no idea how these snakes ever get removed as they sure won’t do it to each other. Maybe China will round them up when Biden let’s them have us.
revolution.
…shotgun…?
How on Earth did the people around the president talk him into not pardoning Julian Assange?
What did they think they were doing?
Threats, it’s real simple with the late 2nd impeachment vote about to happen
its simple.
If you get the hint you are touching a Trip Wire that someone in your camp that could Stab You In the Back values.. you have to forfeit it to continue getting done whatever you can in this DC Hell.
I am quite certain both the CIA and DoD opposed pardoning Assange to avoid further exposure of their misdeeds.
Why didn’t Assange go public with a high-profile UK-US media tandem? Let it all out.
Or is he protecting still-alive sources (not Seth Rich)?
Or is he protecting still-alive sources
This.
Was Seth Rich acting alone?
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1322472841204453381.html
Look at what he didn’t touch, to know what the Cabal fears the most.
Look at what he did touch as the entree.
No one had ever exposed… and continues to expose… what this one man has done for us.
We have to get him back in office to finish the job.
The entire Russian Collusion saga is built on the idea that interference in US elections is illegal. Is it? Presumably, specific STATUTES make it election interference a crime. What are they? What statutory crimes regarding election interference were Mueller and all the rest “investigating”?
If nothing else, Durham has clearly established that Hillary Clinton, her lawyers, her vast herd of minions and operatives, the DoJ, the FBI, the CIA, and most of the “news” media were all interfering in US elections, how is it that THEY are not guilty of violating the same statutes? Is Durham finished? Why no criminal referrals or indictments?
winning with votes is illegal in our country now.
Notice the GOP chair has ignored outreach from the unpaid, but successful, Scott Presler?
Make sure Pompeo gets questioned too.
Interesting that in April this year Pompeo decided to not run for president in 2024…
I know we pretty much know this and most assuredly, not making an excuse, but think of how totally corrupting having access to all of this info could be? The siren song…..it really is at the pinnacle of value; nothing comes close. That is why they fight like the “third monkey leading up to the Ark” to protect access to it and , obviously, to avoid prison.
I was working at my first major post-college graduation professional gig in the mid 1990s. There was a streaming media player that came out, and it turns out that company was the first company caught exfiltraing customer data via software. Our team also discussed how in the non-Microsoft world, system admins could generally read email for anyone in the company. At the time that included basically all of academia and anyone who just like Unix.
We concluded then, and it’s remained valid almost 30 years, that the temptation to spy via technology is too great. There are almost no exceptions.
One memory, while reading this, kept on coming up – the flights of former US government employees and officials (such as former 3-letter agency directors and officers) all traveling to New Zealand. If memory serves me right, think Obama went there on one of those unexplained trips during those years 2018-2019, as well.
It remains to the sitting members of Congress, both House and Senate, to make their decision – will they go down in the history books as this nation’s future honored patriots for generations to come, in the same league as the Washington’s, Jefferson’s, Adam’s, and all those unsung heroes who fought in the revolutionary war that created this nation – or will they become, by their silence, inaction, or collusions as the Benedict Arnold’s that brought about the end of our Republic?
It’s really that simple Congressmen and women – we know what went on, you know we know what went on, we are waiting to see what you do about it.
Create the panel, insist those people appear at the same time – and start asking the right f’ng questions! A grateful nation will remember what you do during the coming months, and year.
I called and wrote the White House asking for Trump to assist Assange. It was clear he had been railroaded and anyone who fell for the ‘he compromised national security’ line, deserves a good thump on the noggin. There’s an Emperor’s New Clothes aspect to the entire set-up that is clear to see if you look at it correctly. This scandal makes Teapot Dome look like a grain of sand. How I wish we could step in and make arrests all up and down the food chain. It would go some way to restoring our Republic, but the fact that there is only stillness and posturing in our Congress speaks volumes.
So who hacked the dnc?
Seth Rich. That’s why he was assassinated.
Street thugs don’t carry revolvers.
Then why didn’t they take his wallet and watch to make it look like a robbery. Are they that inept?
NSA must have all of his communications.
Leaving the wallet was to signal a warning to those who understood it…..
Exactly
Nobody.
Person(s) with access to to the system downloaded the data. Seth Rich most likely one of them. Was he the only one?
Guillotine after questioning.
Too efficient. Something slower is called for.
Dull blade guillotine.
Watch them squirm? That’s it?
Remember the movie Risky Business? Joel had a romantic encounter with Lana, and at the end she stole an artsy fartsy thing that belonged to Joel’s mom.
Joel recruited his friend for backup and used his dad’s Porsche so they could go to a restaurant to confront the lovely Lana. When they got to the restaurant, they got a table with a view of Lana. Joel caught her eye and raised his index finger and nodded.
His friend responded, “That’s it? We went all across the city for that?”
“Don’t worry”, Joel replied. “She knows what she did. And now she knows that we are on to her.”
It sounded lame from Joel. It sounds lame from you.
The deep state knows they have little to fear from you as long as you keep falling for the voting scam when they control outcome. And having them know that we are on to them means nothing.
Bottom line: Those who swore an oath to protect and defend the Constitution are guilty of treason. They know that you know they are guilty. Now we all wait to see who acts first.
We need successful and harsh prosecutions of the low-hanging fruit. Won’t likely happen but we need to start there. The Federal Election Commission violations with DNC/HRC/Perkins-Coie… Following those, we need to offer 5 people immunity for full testimony in their involvement and who gave them orders. Then we need to prosecute THOSE people names by the whistleblowers. Then, 5 more immunity people. Rinse and repeat. The combination of successful prosecution and confessions from the players would bust this thing wide open for all to see. These trials should be held in the Supreme Court.
There are no low hanging fruit, because the directors, assistant directors, all are onboard with the coup. There is no FBI, no DOJ. Most of the State Police have been compromised by federal grant money.
There is only us and them. We the People versus the tyrants who betrayed their oath.
“Now we all wait to see who acts first.”
They all know they are being watched closely, and any attempt to “Act” would be suicidal.
Every signatory of the Declaration of Independence would qualify as suicidal then. And John Hancock’s answer was to write his name as large as he could.
Amen, they thought they were doomed, but pursued knowing they could loose everything.
But for God, America was born.
Everyone was involved, starting with (or likely before) the 702 spying/unmasking by the “contractors”.
If this weren’t such blatant illegal behavior, you’d have to sit back and marvel at the beauty of the design. Everyone was involved. Everyone covered for everyone else. Almost nobody stood up to object when confronted with that “nagging feeling in your gut” that something was terribly wrong.
Shut it all down. All of it.
If these same criminals ….up front and behind the scenes continues dismantling our Country ….then “We the People” lose all our collective power.
Sundance,
This information needs to he conveyed to someone who can expose it to the general public. Have you had any conversations with Tucker Carlson, Matt Taibbi, or Glen Greenwald?
Thank you for all that you do.
Respectfully, this is a recap of what we’ve known going on 4 years now, in toto. It’s been exposed already by a large number of alt media companies and individuals, and books have been written on portions of the scheme. The only thing lacking is a prosecutor, and an impartial jury.
Toto? We’re not in Kansas anymore…
My point is more exposure isn’t going to help… our energy has to be on the lubricating the punishment side. We are losing to Soros AGs, weaponized justice, an incorrigible DC court system, and a captured media. Now we are raising an entire generation of kids who have only heard “Trump is bad” for going on 10 years. They aren’t gonna read anything to change their minds… we have to do this in the courts and fight like he11 to make it happen. Kinda like Kari Lake is going to go down with the ship if she can’t convince AZ courts that the fix was in during signature verification of the mail-in ballots.
I believe exposure is helping.
We may not be in Kansas anymore, but Toto did pull back the curtain.
These bad actors rely on stealth to conduct their operations. They also rely on (prey on) the good will and trust of American citizens.
With exposure, both their stealth and our trust have been lost.
We the People no longer trust large portions of our govt. We have a govt who fears it’s citizens. That’s why they conduct all the false flag operations. They are attempting to get us to live in fear so they can come to the “rescue”. It’s the problem/reaction/solution scheme.
It was successful in the past for so long. But, it doesn’t work anymore. Stealth and trust have been lost.
I’m not living in fear or desperate. Not sure if I can say the same for them. I did not conduct some massive conspiratorial scheme to attempt to stay in power. They did.
I will be relaying this message to journalist close to Greenwald/ Mate/Blumenthal et al.
There are actual journalist that while they view DJT dimly and have political views in variance with MAGA, they are ardent opponents of the Security State criminals. They are also strong supporters of Julian Assange.
Consider this, Julian Assange is the very epitome of journalistic integrity. What he is suffering thru is simply because HE WILL NOT OUT HIS SOURCE, Seth Rich. He could have taken the heat off of himself and exposed this fraud if he would have just outed Seth Rich. But he didn’t. Outing one’s source is journalistic taboo.
Julian Assange is a man of great integrity.
FREE JULIAN ASSANGE
There’s no integrity in letting this b******* go on. I reject your premise out of hand. Seth Rich got murdered.
If every journalist had Julian’s integrity this b******* would have been over a long time ago
I could understand silos, if someone is above all, overlapping the different investigations to push a case of corruption.
the Silo’ing itself without that greater reason – is a coverup itself.
I’ve read all three parts. So many thoughts. So many emotions.
Like so many have said, in different ways:
What will happen to make any of this right?
What’s next?
Some here may be acquainted with the work of Miles Mathis. Even tho I take strong exception to everything he says about Jews and Phoenicians, not everything Mathis writes is so tainted. Like this, published March 4th 2014: http://milesmathis.com/glenn.pdf
“Put the panel of Barr, Rosenstein, Horowitz, Mueller, Weissmann, Durham and Wray in front of congress. Ask each one: “Who is Seth Rich?” ”
You’re assuming anyone in Congress WANTS the truth told.
Suspicious Cat remains…… well, you know.
If the Chinese or the Islamists were to detonate a nuclear device in DC while Congress is in session, the handful of good people who will die will be worth it.
The leftists and the statists in the bureaucracy and the courts and Biden and his cabinet and other Deep State people and the Pentagon and the FBI and the CIA would also die.
We could start fresh, without depending on a totally compromised justice system.
Beat it shill
“Put the panel of Barr, Rosenstein, Horowitz, Mueller, Weissmann, Durham and Wray in front of congress. Ask each one: “Who is Seth Rich?”
i would pay to see this.
The See 👁 a & the Dept of State have been vipers nests of traitors since they were born.
Mike Pompeo headed both agencies & did less than nothing to clean them out.
I always considered Pompeo to be Trump’s “handler.” Still do.
It’s shocking that at this point Sundance still thinks there is hope for justice to be served. You can put all of these miscreants in front of some Congressional committee and ask them about the DNC hack all day long and all you will get is blank stares, lies and 5th Amendment claims.
If no one goes to prison then it’s all just bullshit.
During the Trump Administration, the Deep State was divided into two camps. One saw Trump as an asset to be manipulated, while the other saw Trump as a liability to be eliminated. To make it easier for you, I’ll call the former “Team Asset” and the latter “Team Liability” from here on out.
With that stated, have you ever wondered how Trump was able to survive not one but TWO impeachments despite there being more than enough Deep State-affiliated Senators to remove him at any time? I do. And I’ve concluded that it was because the (neocon-dominated) Team Asset fought back. Even though they hated Trump and participated in the Russia hoax, they did so in hopes of manipulating Trump into pursuing neocon policies. They did NOT want him removed from office; they knew that would result in them being sidelined. They also opposed Team Liability’s efforts to rig the 2020 election on the same grounds, but of course they lost that battle.
In 2023 the former members of Team Asset are divided over whether to support Trump again, or to support another GOP candidate like DeSantis or Haley. But one thing’s for certain: they want revenge for being sidelined by Team Liability. So they’re relying on Durham to destroy the reputations of Team Liability’s key players, in hopes that Biden either resigns, is removed, or loses re-election to the GOP candidate of their choice. That way, they can once again enjoy the power they enjoyed during Trump’s term.
Of course, Trump can very easily prevent that from happening even if he wins. If only he wised up to what’s going on.
False friends are worse than enemies.
False friends are worse than enemies. Indeed!! Do we believe that PDJT learned from that?
HEADS ON PIKES… you can go “figuratively” if you’re so inclined… I’m more like… literal … as this scope&depth of corruption cannot be tolerated… it cannot be rehabilitated… it must be extracted.. it must be expunged. It won’t be “fixed” by tweaking the “processes” or the “procedures” .. or administrative changes to this “system” or that FISA review process… no oversight committee strongly worded findings or “legislative” measures implemented will stop this from happening again… ONLY the most stringent.. absolutely permanent examples of deterrence will have impact on the brainwork of any future individuals contemplating like TREASONOUS matters..
Unless & Until that is our course correction… we continue our slide to ultimate destruction…
Thatisall…
This theory hinges on the bad guys not wanting to get trump elected, but it flies in the face of the fact that THEY DID want to get trump elected and successfully pulled it off when the fbi gave the news briefing about Hillary’s emails 11 days before the election, and again when the fbi gave a briefing stating trump was CLEARED of Russian involvement a mere 3 days before the election.
They intentionally got trump in office bc he would be easier to take down. The election was stolen indeed, just not like how anyone expected.
Sure thing, Hillary.
the part you are missing (and I agree btw, that there was no reason for comey to perform the october surprise), is that the IC/DOJ/DOD/FBI had already established an insurance policy to control President Trump. They would either control him thru congress and limit his decision making and foreign policy, or fabricate criminal allegations, and or impeach him.
in fact they all of the above, and to be objectively honest, it did work. President Trump was up against the most powerful and effective secret police spy state that did in fact beat the living shit out of every single thing he did or attempted to do. We must never forget this reality. In spite of that action, that President Trump was able to accomplish as much as he did FOR THIS COUNTRY…is nothing short of a miracle.
the point I am trying to make here…is this: the IC-secret police state is an equal opportunity F$%^ER! It doesn’t matter if it is hrc, OR President Trump.. It isn’t the PERSON they are after…it is the POWER..the POSITION IN THE WHITE HOUSE.
there are two ways to steal money. You can break into the bank and drive off with it. OR, you can manipulate the banker to send you free money…
HRC apparently set off some hard red lines with the secret police spy state. That is obvious. Perhaps her willingness to play ball anymore had been replaced with some crazy idea as president she would be able to do things “her way”…Maybe there was something else also that she had done that would come out if she was allowed to become president. October surprise was not coincidental…Comey did not do that because he was trying to give some illusion of trust. he was influencing an election..no ways to square that any other way.
Thus, this promotes President Trump…but not to promote him in the way that you are describing…remember that the IC secret police spy state had already set in motion all of the foundations for committing THE COUP.
and this continues.
the reason why they have left HRC alone..is because she has never raised even a hint that she will consider running again..so mission accomplished.
President Trump on the other hand, continues to give them night terrors and THE COUP IS STILL IN FULL ACTIVE MODE.
God Bless America
Somewhat in the same vein.
If we assume all elections have been compromised to some degree since 1964 then look at who was elected….it was always someone that could be controlled either directly or indirectly and to a greater or lesser degree. (This assumption would cover congressional leadership also. )
Hillary was going out of control with drugs, alcohol, health and attitude. Nix Hillary and now blame her as final phases of that plan. Judging by his actions they wanted Pence but the baited trap was avoided.
The 2020 farce was a 66% turnout after years of approximately 60% voter turnout. The states of PA, Mi,WI, OH and FL flip very oddly over 2000 to 2020. The fix was in both ways in 2020 and only one way in 2016 imho. Hints on the net of last minute machine manipulation in 2015/16 vote but the usual Tammany hall tactics had already been deployed for Hillary.
Thank you Sundance for this extensive and thoughtful compilation and your insightful analysis. However, why has Dana Rohrabacher been silent after his interview with Assange? Why has neither Durham nor Congress, of which Roheabacher was a member, further interviewed him?
His name was Seth Rich
Let’s call this what it is : A GOVERNMENT CONSPIRACY BY THE OBOMA ADMINISTRATION TO DESTROY THE INCOMING DULY ELECTED PRESIDENT. Traitors all.
And if Durham touched Assange, he also would be questioning Debbie Wasserman Shultz who ran the corrupt thug Awan family who had senators passwords and possible blackmail of same. Durham would also have lifted the covers off of DWS involvement in the Awan involvement of Seth Rich murder, and the senatorial protection committee who could not allow the IT scandal to break.
I believe so much of the corruption centers around the DNC leak that the higher up leftists in the FBLie simply would do anything to prevent the Awan, DWS, senate blackmail, and Seth Rich murder, from ever seeing the light of day.
It is beyond discouraging to see the huge opportunity Durham wasted to expose governmental-wide malfeasance and get to the bottom of things. What a deep disappointment he has turned out to be! He sold his soul to Satan to basically report that there was no harm done nor foul made.
The adversaries think they have covered all of their filthy tracks, but God sees and knows ALL! Thank Him for His ultimate Judgment Day, when the books of human deeds are opened and either punished or praised — we will go one way or the other for all time.
Angels will sing for and welcome the righteous redeemed into Heaven, while unrepentant sinners will be riding the express escalator to fiery Hell for their eternity, with not even a drop of water on their tongues and no Lazarus in sight.
Thanks always to Sundance for excellent reporting and analyses. The Democrats need Russia to be the bogeyman to divert attention from the real threat to the American Republic, the Peoples Republic of China and specifically the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The CCP is actively engaged in undermining Western values and societal cohesiveness. They have declared this war openly. However, both the greedy and the Neo-Communist dreamers in the West feed mind and body off the CCP. Biden picked this fight with Russia using the very corrupt Ukraine as his proxy so as to distract attention from his numerous policy failures. Communist China is at the heart of even internal the political and legal maneuvers intended to take Trump out–he is one guy the CCP doesn’t own.
What not doing your job can lead to.
He may have triggered WWIII and a nuclear war by not telling the complete truth and nothing but the truth, so help him GOD. You see, three NATO countries are responsible for equipping and training the pilots fighting for Ukraine, in F-16s.
This action forces Russia to target these same three countries with high speed Russian missiles. These countries become a trigger pulled for WWIII.
Has Durham become the face of death?
I’m skimming Wikipedia now, and up pops a picture of Mike Pompeo… and the Ecuadorian president!
Wikipedia: “The New York Times commented that it and other news organisations obtained the same documents as WikiLeaks also without government authorisation. It said it was not clear how WikiLeaks’ publications were legally different from other publications of classified information.”
“The Associated Press reported that the indictment raised concerns about media freedom, as Assange’s solicitation and publication of classified information is a routine job journalists perform.”
As much as I would like to see this happen, it never will. The vast majority of Congressfolks are completely compromised and are easily leveraged to do nothing.
I recall shortly after the claim of the Russia hack, there was some NATO email leaks (separate from). One in particular was a USAF guy high up in NATO ranks.
He was adamant the hack was an act of war, & pissed Nobama would not give the ok on going after b/c of.
It’s the only thing I’ve ever agreed with Nobama on.
Only now we know why that really was, & Nobama knew all along it wasn’t Russia.
Time to release Julian Assange and the J6’ers.
What a disgrace. I wish I learned something new these last couple days but Sundance has taught us all too well, these past 6+years, specifically regarding all of this.
I know in my heart, all roads lead up to the stolen 2020 election, by mail in ballot, using the release of a pathogen and lockdown. Every machination of the Uniparty to unseat an elected President by any means possible, is nothing compared to the murder, mayhem and damage, they caused weaponizing a Pandemic.
May GOD have mercy on us all.
Sundance, there are top people within the various silos who have read (and are currently reading) your blogs on this subject, and today (and probably yesterday) they have been contacting each other and discussing ways to stop you from reporting the 100% truth as you have outlined. I’m not sure who they want to take out first, Assange or you. STAY SAFE SUNDANCE !!
Right now, we need another “Snowden” insider at the NSA (or whatever agency is tracking emails, text messaging and phone calls) to push out to the public these current ongoing discussions of criminality so that the PEOPLE other than us Treepers can see the real truth.
Remember the reporting of Hillary having a meltdown and said if Trump wins we all hang from nooses? Well, now we know just how all the 3 letter agencies tried to prevent their demise.
Let’s get the rope ready.
https://www.truthandaction.org/hillary-clinton-if-that-f-ing-bastard-trump-wins-we-all-hang-from-nooses/3/
Thank you Sundance for your steadfast and dogged persistence to getting to the truth and for sharing it with us.
I didn’t know Assange had an intimate relationship with his lawyer, and has 2 children with her.
Wikipedia: “In May 2023 Assange wrote a letter to King Charles III saying he is a political prisoner and requested the King visit him in prison.”
But Intell Services have leverage on the King with his brother, right?
July 05, 2016 crooked Comey announced NO charges against Reptillary. July 10, 2016 DNC staffer, commie Sanders supporter, SETH RICH was assassinated by two MS-13 gangsters, found dead in Virginia that morning. July 22, 2016 WikiLeaks drops DNC dirt. Durham didn’t go anywhere near the Truth
Is it okay to copy a link to this article and send to @stella_assange on Twitter?
I would say yes –
Everything you read and review upon these pages is free for the taking. Anyone, for any reason, can take any content I produce and use it to advance the honest effort of providing raw unfiltered truth to their audience.Everything is available for use free, without any attribution or citation needed.
All that I provide is free and can be modified, changed, enhanced in part or whole to meet your needs. Images, writing, research, analysis, all of it is provided, along with no expectation of citation or attribution dependent on your motives and intents.
Sundance
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2023/05/17/site-and-content-reminder-from-sundance/
What about Seth Rich, Sundance??? I think, it was the begining of all this stuff.
Everyone on Twitter needs to share all parts 1, 2 & 3.
We all knew this about Assange way back, but this article brought it all home again with the timeline dates.
Frankly, 45 was lucky to escape with his head.
Don’t think they don’t have a plan for ’24. Assange and everyone else is just collateral damage which they care nothing about, but he was and still is the target, and UK/AUS were and still are the co-conspirators. I wouldn’t be traveling there.
Keep posting, Sundance.
Keep posting.
It ain’t over ’til it’s over.
I would feel satisfied if each and every one of them was forced into bankruptcy trying to defend their actions and then had to forfeit their government pensions. Now that would be justice.
Our entire government is corrupt. The Obama administration with the help of the Clinton campaign, and the IC told every citizen to FO, we are in control. Burn it to the ground. No professional politicians, diplomats, bureaucratic dip wads, the IC is compromised. No wonder we can’s get any criminals but White Conservative Christians. It’s much worse than we never thought.
So, Assange is in jail all this time because he broke the law? What law, did he break? Where is the evidence and his trial? He is a political prisoner at this point.
If there is no evidence against Assange, what evidence does Assange have, who does it implicate, and why are they(?) keeping him alive? Assange has a kill switch that will trigger if he dies?
Is this simply that Assange has evidence that Obama or Hillary are involved in Seth Rich’s murder? Because before Seth Rich died, the worst thing they were doing was messing up Bernie Sander’s chance of getting the nomination, as far as I know.
What else could Assange know?
The problem with the SECOND alleged Russian hack of the DNC, the alleged GRU (Russian military intelligence hack) is that it sits on something that can’t be verified. It isn’t the CrowdStrike report, it is the alleged GRU LEASED SERVER that Mueller’s indictment of the 12 Russian names claims was their main piece of evidence. This GRU Sever, based in the US, was seized by the FBI and subjected to forensic analysis, or so we are told. The alleged GRU hackers had installed a key logging program in the DNC network, and every time the GRU hackers worked inside the DNC network, their own malware was logging their keystrokes. Again, it is a piece of evidence we have no ability of verifying as no one in whom we have confidence will ever be able to access it, or access an image of its contents.
Shawn Henry refused to testify under oath to Congress that the Russians stole the DNC emails and gave them to Wikileaks. He seemed more inclined to accuse the FIRST alleged Russian hackers, the SVR/FSB hacking group which the FBI refers to as “The Dukes.” That group had access to everything on the DNC network and was even monitoring their VoiP telephone system. It is this bunch who stole the “Renteria Document,” which might be why another Russian hacking group inside the GRU had to be implicated. NO ONE DISCUSSES “COZY BEAR,” the first Russian hacking group who entered the DNC network for either SVR or FSB SHORTLY AFTER HILLARY FELL UNDER FBI INVESTIGATION FOR THE ABUSE OF HER SENSITIVE COMPARTMENTED INFORMATION FACILITIES (SCIFs), and how she used an unsecured email system to transmit those documents as attachments in emails, and stored them on an unsecured server. It was not about “Her Emails.” It was about “Her SCIFs.”
I believe “Cozy Bear” to be a real Russian intelligence hack, since they would be concerned about the FBI investigation of Hillary Clinton for a variety of reasons, and wanted to see if it was something about which the Kremlin had to worry. “Cozy Bear” was a Russian hack about which THE FBI KNEW, but did little to nothing about for MONTHS while Russian hackers cavorted in the DNC network. Some say this has nothing to do with National Security, so that is why the FBI did very little about it except warn the DNC about it. DNC hired experts COULD NOT FIND THE “COZY BEAR” hackers. Regular DNC Information Technology employees found the GRU “Fancy Bear” hackers because, as Donna Brazile stated in her book, HACKS, the GRU hackers made all the noise they could to alert everyone of their presence prior to stealing virtually worthless emails. The main purpose of the Fancy Bear “attack” was to deflect attention away from Cozy Bear, the real Russian hack.
Actually, Russian spies hacking the DNC must be a National Security problem since the 2014 claims by JOHN BRENNAN, CIA Director, that RUSSIA WAS GOING TO INTERFERE IN WESTERN NATIONS’ ELECTIONS:
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/08/14/obama-russia-election-interference-241547
Brennan came up with the Russian interference claim just as Brennan was under fire for hacking Senate Select Committee on Intelligence staffers who were investigating Brennan involvement in CIA TORTURE, which JOHN DURHAM WOULD LATER INVESTIGATE with the result of NOTHING HAPPENING.
So the US intelligence community is warned about “Russian Interference” in elections in 2014, and a year later a Russian hacking group is inside the DNC network transmitting data to Moscow, and NO ONE DOES ANYTHING. So, when they want to help Hillary Clinton deflect the stuff about her SCIFs and illegal email system onto Donald Trump, the real “Cozy Bear” hack gets no play, while the “clumsy and inept” GRU “Fancy Bear” hack gets all the attention to the point “Cozy Bear” is VIRTUALLY ERASED from the story, and the “Renteria Document” is declared a forgery—a forgery, for some bizarre reason, gets classified as SENSITIVE COMPARTMENTED INFORMATION, which can only be read or discussed in a SCIF.
Forgeries are supposed to be fake, and therefore useless.
Did Seth Rich know something about the Cozy Bear hacking? Did he tell Assange something about the Russians ?
First, someone has to come up with proof that Seth Rich was in contact with either Assange (not likely) or Wikileaks. Until someone does, it is an assumption that hangs on nothing. You can’t assume something like that and then move on to a conclusion about how all of this happened because of him. You can only follow the evidence we have.
Revelation chap 18, vv 2,3
Yes, oh yes.
And he cried out with a strong voice, saying: Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen; and is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every unclean spirit, and the hold of every unclean and hateful bird: 3 Because all nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication; and the kings of the earth have committed fornication with her; and the merchants of the earth have been made rich by the power of her delicacies.
Rev 18 : 4-5
‘ And I heard another voice from heaven, saying: Go out from her, my people; that you be not partakers of her sins, and that you receive not of her plagues. 5 For her sins have reached unto heaven, and the Lord hath remembered her iniquities.’
By the way, DeSantis is running for Chief Executive. announced today.
The “silos” are a version of the blind men and the elephant.
Each man knows only his portion of the elephant – the trunk; the tail; the leg; the ear; – but none comprehends the true nature of the whole animal before them.
Ergo – the elephant in the room.