For a brief moment I will allow myself to imagine that Tucker Carlson’s research team is aware of the information we have previously provided. If so, an interview with Julian Assange could be exceptionally interesting.
Tucker posts on Twitter that he was visiting with Julian Assange today:
A WALK IN THE VERY DEEP WEEDS….
The Weissmann/Mueller report contains claims that Russia hacked the DNC servers as the central element to the Russia interference narrative in the U.S. election. This DNC hack claim is the fulcrum issue structurally underpinning the Russian election interference narrative pushed by the Weissmann and Muller Special Counsel. However, this essential claim is directly disputed by WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, as outlined during a Dana Rohrabacher interview and by Julian Assange’s own on-the-record statements.
Assange was arrested at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London immediately after the Weissmann/Muller report was released to Bill Barr. Despite investigating the background of the Trump-Russia nonsense, John Durham never touched the DNC hacking claim – the core of the Mueller report. Why? Because Durham knew the U.S. Government threw a bag over Assange to protect the fraudulent Trump-Russia and Russian interference claims.
Again, this reality speaks to the corruption within the John Durham investigation. Durham was protecting Weissmann, Mueller and the core of their justification for a 2-year investigation. Durham knows why Assange was arrested. Durham stayed away from it, intentionally.
The Russians HAD TO have made efforts to interfere in the election, or else the factual basis for the surveillance operation against candidate Donald Trump is naked to the world.
That’s why so much DOJ, FBI and Mueller special counsel energy was exhausted framing the predicate.
“Seventeen intelligence agencies,” the December 29th Joint Analysis Report, the expulsion of the Russian diplomats which was an outcropping of the JAR, the rushed January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment, shoving microphones in everyone’s faces and demanding they answer if they believed Russia interfered – all of it, and I do mean every bit of it, is predicated on an absolute DC need to establish that Russia Attempted to Interfere in the 2016 election.
The “Russian Malicious Cyber Activity – Joint Analysis Report” (full pdf) is pure nonsense. It outlines nothing more than vague and disingenuous typical hacking activity that is no more substantive than any other hacking report on any other foreign actor. However, it was needed to help frame the Russian interference narrative.
There were no Russian diplomats involved; there was no Russian election interference; there was no Russian hacking of the DNC; it was all a fraud created by the intelligence community (IC), FBI and Main Justice to support Hillary Clinton’s lies and then cover their own targeting tracks.
On September 26, 2021, Yahoo News published an extensive article about the CIA targeting WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange in 2017 and the extreme conversations that were taking place at the highest levels of the U.S. government about how to control him.
There is a much bigger story transparently obvious when overlapped with CTH research files on the Mueller investigation and the U.S. intelligence community. Specifically, the motive intentionally not outlined by Yahoo News.
What I am going to share is a deep dive using the resources and timeline from within that Yahoo article and the specific details we have assembled that paints a clear picture about what interests existed for the Deep State, the Intelligence apparatus and the Mueller-Weissmann special counsel.
This fully cited review is not for the faint of heart. This is a journey that could shock many; it could alarm more and will likely force more than a few to reevaluate just what the purpose was for Mike Pompeo within the Donald Trump administration.
As the Yahoo News article begins, they outline how those within the Trump administration viewed Assange as a risk in 2017.
Here it is critical to accept that many people inside the Trump administration were there to control events, not to facilitate a policy agenda from a political outsider. In the example of Assange, the information he carried was a risk to those who attempted and failed to stop Trump from winning the 2016 election.
Julian Assange was not a threat to Donald Trump, but he was a threat to those who attempted to stop Donald Trump. In 2017, the DC system was reacting to a presidency they did not control. As an outcome, the Office of the President was being managed and influenced by some with ulterior motives.
Yahoo, via Michael Isikoff, puts it this way: “Some senior officials inside the CIA and the Trump administration even discussed killing Assange, going so far as to request “sketches” or “options” for how to assassinate him. Discussions over kidnapping or killing Assange occurred “at the highest levels” of the Trump administration, said a former senior counterintelligence official. “There seemed to be no boundaries.”
As we overlay the timeline, it is prudent to pause and remember some hindsight details. According to reports in November of 2019, U.S. Attorney John Durham and U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr were spending time looking carefully at CIA activity in the 2016 presidential election. One quote from a media-voice increasingly sympathetic to a political deep-state noted:
“One British official with knowledge of Barr’s wish list presented to London commented that, “It is like nothing we have come across before, they are basically asking, in quite robust terms, for help in doing a hatchet job on their own intelligence services”“. (Link)
It is interesting that quote came from a British intelligence official, as there was extensive pre-2016 election evidence of an FBI/CIA counterintelligence operation that also involved U.K. intelligence services. There was an aspect to the FBI/CIA operation that overlaps with both a U.S. and U.K. need to keep Wikileaks founder Julian Assange under tight control.
To understand the risk that Julian Assange represented to FBI/CIA interests, and effectively the Mueller special counsel, it is important to understand just how extensive the operations of the FBI/CIA were in 2016. It is within this network of foreign and domestic operations where FBI Agent Peter Strzok was clearly working as a bridge between the CIA and FBI operations.
By now, people are familiar with the construct of CIA operations involving Joseph Mifsud, a Maltese professor generally identified as a western intelligence operative who was tasked by the FBI/CIA to run an operation against Trump campaign official George Papadopoulos in both Italy (Rome) and London. {Go Deep} John Durham ignored him.
In a similar fashion, the FBI tasked U.S. intelligence asset Stefan Halper to target another Trump campaign official, Carter Page. Under the auspices of being a Cambridge Professor, Stefan Halper also targeted General Michael Flynn. Additionally, using assistance from a female FBI agent, under the false name Azra Turk, Halper also targeted Papadopoulos. Again, John Durham ignored it.
The initial operations to target Flynn, Papadopoulos and Page were all based overseas. This seemingly makes the CIA exploitation of the assets and the targets legal and much easier. If Durham went into this intelligence rabbit hole, there would be a paper trail that leads back to Robert Mueller. Durham didn’t go there.
John Durham and IG Michael Horowitz both outlined how very specific exculpatory evidence was known to the FBI and Main Justice, yet that evidence was withheld from the FISA application used against Carter Page and/or it was ignored. The FBI fabricated information in the FISA and removed evidence that Carter Page was previously working for the CIA. This is what FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith was indicted and convicted for doing.
One week after the FBI and DOJ filed the second renewal for the Carter Page FISA [April 7, 2017], Yahoo News notes how Mike Pompeo delivered his first remarks as CIA Director:
[…] On April 13, 2017, wearing a U.S. flag pin on the left lapel of his dark gray suit, Pompeo strode to the podium at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), a Washington think tank, to deliver to a standing-room-only crowd his first public remarks as Trump’s CIA director.
Rather than use the platform to give an overview of global challenges or to lay out any bureaucratic changes he was planning to make at the agency, Pompeo devoted much of his speech to the threat posed by WikiLeaks. (link)
Why would CIA Director Mike Pompeo be so concerned about Julian Assange and Wikileaks in April 2017?
In April of 2017 Pompeo’s boss, President Donald Trump, was under assault from the intelligence community writ large, and every deep state actor was leaking to the media in a frenzied effort to continue the Trump-Russia collusion conspiracy.
The Trump-Russia effort was so all consuming that FBI Director James Comey was even keeping a diary of engagement with President Trump in order to support an ongoing investigation built on fraud – yet, Mike Pompeo is worried about Julian Assange.
Again, here it is important to put yourself back into the time of reference. Remember, it’s clear in the text messages between FBI Agent Strzok and Lisa Page that Peter Strzok had a working relationship with what he called their “sister agency”, the CIA.
♦ Former CIA Director John Brennan admitted Peter Strzok helped write the January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) which outlines the Russia narrative; and it was also Peter Strzok who authored the July 31st, 2016, “Electronic Communication” from the CIA to the FBI that originated FBI operation “Crossfire Hurricane.” Strzok immediately used that EC to travel to London to debrief intelligence officials around Australian Ambassador to the U.K. Alexander Downer.
In short, Peter Strzok was a profoundly overzealous James Bond wannabe who acted as a bridge between the CIA and the FBI. The perfect type of FBI career agent for 2016’s CIA Director John Brennan to utilize.
Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson hired CIA Open-Source analyst Nellie Ohr toward the end of 2015, at appropriately the same time as “FBI Contractors” were identified exploiting the NSA database and extracting information on a specific set of U.S. persons. One, if not the primary extractors, has now been identified as Rodney Joffe at Neustar. “The campaign plot was outlined by Durham in a 27-page indictment charging former Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann with making a false report to the FBI. The plot was also outlined in the finished Durham report. Eight individuals who allegedly conspired with Sussmann but does not identify them by name. The sources familiar with the probe confirmed that the leader of the team of contractors was Rodney L. Joffe.” {Go Deep}
It was also Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson who was domestically tasked with a Russian lobbyist named Natalia Veselnitskaya. A little reported Russian Deputy Attorney General named Saak Albertovich Karapetyan was working as a double agent for the CIA and Kremlin. Karapetyan was directing the foreign operations of Natalia Veselnitskaya, and Glenn Simpson was organizing her inside the U.S as part of his Trump-Russia creation.
Glenn Simpson managed Veselnitskaya through the 2016 Trump Tower meeting with Donald Trump Jr. However, once the CIA/Fusion GPS operation using Veselnitskaya started to unravel with public reporting, back in Russia Deputy AG Karapetyan died in a helicopter crash.
Simultaneously timed in late 2015 through mid 2016, there was a domestic FBI operation using a young Russian named Maria Butina tasked to run up against Republican presidential candidates. According to Patrick Byrne, Butina’s handler, was FBI agent Peter Strzok who was giving Byrne the instructions on where to send her. {Go Deep}
All of this context outlines the extent to which the FBI/CIA was openly involved in constructing a political operation that settled upon anyone in candidate Donald Trump’s orbit. A large international operation directed by the FBI/CIA and domestic operations seemingly directed by Peter Strzok operating with a foot in both agencies. [Strzok gets CIA service coin] Durham eviscerated the predicate for all of this in his report, yet stayed away from the part that leads to Robert Mueller in 2017.
Recap: ♦Mifsud tasked against Papadopoulos (CIA). ♦Halper tasked against Flynn (CIA), Page (CIA) and Papadopoulos (CIA). ♦Azra Turk, pretending to be Halper asst, tasked against Papadopoulos (FBI). ♦Veselnitskaya tasked against Donald Trump Jr. (CIA, Fusion GPS). ♦Butina tasked against Trump and Donald Trump Jr (FBI).
Additionally, Christopher Steele was a British intelligence officer hired by Fusion GPS to assemble and launder fraudulent intelligence information within his dossier. And we cannot forget Oleg Deripaska, a Russian oligarch, who was recruited by Asst. FBI Director Andrew McCabe to participate in running an operation against the Trump campaign and create the impression of Russian involvement. Deripaska refused to participate.
All of this engagement directly controlled by U.S. intelligence, and all of this intended to give a specific Russia impression. This predicate was what John Durham was reviewing in November of 2019, and then released in his final report – while whitewashing the parts that led to the Mueller silo.
The key point of all that contextual background is to see how committed the CIA and FBI were to the constructed narrative of Russia interfering with the 2016 election. The CIA, FBI, and by extension the DOJ and a multitude of political operatives, put a hell of a lot of work into it.
We know John Durham looked at the construct of the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA); and talking to CIA analysts who participated in the construct of the January 2017 report that bolstered the false appearance of Russian interference in the 2016 election. This context is important, because it ties in to the next part that involves Julian Assange and Wikileaks. This is where the motives of Mike Pompeo in mid/late 2017 come into play.
[…] By the summer of 2017, the CIA’s proposals were setting off alarm bells at the National Security Council. “WikiLeaks was a complete obsession of Pompeo’s,” said a former Trump administration national security official. (link)
On April 11th, 2019, the Julian Assange indictment was unsealed in the Eastern District of Virginia (EDVA). From the indictment we discover it was under seal since March 6th, 2018:
On Tuesday April 15, 2019, more investigative material was released. Again, note the dates: Grand Jury, *December of 2017* This means FBI investigation prior to….
The FBI investigation took place prior to December 2017, it was coordinated through the Eastern District of Virginia (EDVA) where Dana Boente was U.S. Attorney at the time. The grand jury indictment was sealed from March of 2018 until after Mueller completed his investigation, April 2019.
Why the delay?
What exactly was the DOJ waiting for from March 2018 to April 2019?
This timeframe is the peak of the Robert Mueller/Andrew Weissmann special counsel investigation.
Here’s where it gets interesting….
The Yahoo article outlines, “There was an inappropriate level of attention to Assange“, by the CIA according to a national security council official. However, if you consider the larger ramifications of what Julian Assange represented to all of those people inside and outside government interests who created the Trump-Russia collusion/conspiracy, well, there was actually a serious risk.
Remember, in May 2017 Robert Mueller and Andrew Weissmann effectively took over the DOJ. The purpose of the Mueller investigation was to cover up the illegal operation that took place in the preceding year. The people exposed in the Trump-Russia targeting operation included all of those intelligence operatives previously outlined in the CIA, FBI and DOJ operations. These are the people John Durham did not indict.
The FBI submission to the Eastern District of Virginia Grand Jury in December of 2017 was four months after congressman Dana Rohrabacher talked to Julian Assange in August of 2017: “Assange told a U.S. congressman … he can prove the leaked Democratic Party documents … did not come from Russia.”
(August 2017, The Hill Via John Solomon) Julian Assange told a U.S. congressman on Tuesday he can prove the leaked Democratic Party documents he published during last year’s election did not come from Russia and promised additional helpful information about the leaks in the near future.
Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, a California Republican who is friendly to Russia and chairs an important House subcommittee on Eurasia policy, became the first American congressman to meet with Assange during a three-hour private gathering at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, where the WikiLeaks founder has been holed up for years.
Rohrabacher recounted his conversation with Assange to The Hill.
“Our three-hour meeting covered a wide array of issues, including the WikiLeaks exposure of the DNC [Democratic National Committee] emails during last year’s presidential election,” Rohrabacher said, “Julian emphatically stated that the Russians were not involved in the hacking or disclosure of those emails.”
Pressed for more detail on the source of the documents, Rohrabacher said he had information to share privately with President Trump. (read more)
Dana Rohrabacher later published this account of the events:
Knowing how much effort the CIA and FBI put into the Russia collusion-conspiracy narrative; and knowing that Assange could essentially destroy the baseline predicate for the entire Trump-Russia investigation – which included the use of Robert Mueller; it would make sense for corrupt government officials to take keen interest after this August 2017 meeting between Rohrabacher and Assange.
That contact between Rohrabacher and Assange explains why those same government officials would quickly gather specific evidence (related to Wikileaks and Bradley Manning) for a grand jury by December 2017.
Within three months of the grand jury seating (Nov/Dec 2017), the DOJ generated an indictment and sealed it in March 2018.
The EDVA then sat on the Julian Assange indictment while the Mueller/Weissman probe was ongoing.
As soon as the Mueller probe ended, on April 11th, 2019, a planned and coordinated effort between the U.K. and U.S. was executed; Julian Assange was forcibly arrested and removed from the Ecuadorian embassy in London, and the EDVA indictment was unsealed (link).
As a person who researched this fiasco, including the ridiculously false 2016 Russian hacking/interference narrative: “17 intelligence agencies”, Joint Analysis Report (JAR) needed for Obama’s anti-Russia narrative in December ’16, and then a month later the ridiculously political Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) in January ’17, this timing against Assange is not coincidental.
It doesn’t take a deep researcher to see the aligned Deep State motive to control Julian Assange, because the Mueller report was dependent on Russia cybercrimes, and that narrative is contingent on the Russia DNC hack story which Julian Assange disputes. Again, John Durham stayed away from it!
♦ This is critical. The Weissmann/Mueller report contains claims that Russia hacked the DNC servers as the central element to the Russia interference narrative in the U.S. election.
This claim is the fulcrum underpinning the Russia election interference narrative. However, this core and essential claim is directly disputed by Julian Assange, as outlined during the Dana Rohrabacher interview, and by Julian Assange’s on-the-record statements.
The predicate for Robert Mueller’s investigation was specifically due to Russian interference in the 2016 election.
The fulcrum for this Russia interference claim is the intelligence community assessment (Peter Strzok); and the only factual evidence claimed within the ICA is that Russia hacked the DNC servers; a claim only made possible by relying on forensic computer analysis from another Michael Sussmann partner, Shawn Henry at Crowdstrike, yes another DNC contractor and collaborator with the Clinton campaign.
The CIA held a massive conflict of self-interest problem surrounding the Russian hacking claim as it pertained to their own activity in 2016. The FBI and DOJ always held a massive interest in maintaining the Russian hacking claim. Robert Mueller and Andrew Weismann did everything they could to support that predicate; and all of those foreign countries whose intelligence apparatus participated with Brennan and Strzok also carried a self-interest in maintaining that Russia hacking and interference narrative.
Julian Assange was/is the only person with direct knowledge of how Wikileaks gained custody of the DNC emails; and Assange claimed he has evidence it was from an inside DNC leak, not from a DNC hack.
The Russian “hacking” claim was ultimately so important to the CIA, FBI, DOJ, ODNI and U.K Intelligence apparatus. Well, right there is the obvious motive to shut Assange down as soon as intelligence officials knew the Mueller report was going to be public. And that is exactly what Main Justice and the U.S. intelligence community did.
This is why John Durham never touched it.
All of them know what happened.
All of them know why Julian Assange was taken from the Embassy in London. A bag had to be thrown over Assange in order to retain the justification for the Weissmann/Mueller special counsel and the larger Russian election interference claims. None of them do not know this. They all know.
Start asking the right questions about the timeline of Assange being arrested. Ask about the DNC hack and Russian provenance according to Crowdstrike. Ask key and specific questions about the FBI working with Crowdstrike and about the DOJ and EDVA case against Assange.
The people around the Deep State all know what happened. SO DO WE!
Thank you Sundance. This is an exceptionally great writing you posted today and I am very thankful for it. But it hurt me to read it.
The plight of Julian Assange has been a weight on my soul for many years now. Thank you for reminding me that not a one wants to touch what he his has revealed. Speaking Truth to Power, as Assange has done is seemingly until now, been his death sentence.
Why Tucker will/may/ or might get an interview with Julian seems like a publicity stunt. But that’s okay by me. Tucker has a large following. At the very least he can tell us the story of why he wasn’t allowed to interview him.
Bob Dylan: When you gonna wake up?
Thank you. Bob Dylan’s Gospel Album: Slow Train Coming.
Tucker has been covering Assange for years. Detailed shows.
👍
Too many people have said that “we have it all” on proof of misdeeds, and cheating on elections. For me and many others, it is way past time to say that one has the proof, it is time to show it.
Well…keep paying attention! DJT has said he will do just that at the J6 trial of him!
You want proof of cheating on elections. There’s mountains of it out there. Did you see the hearings that took place in various battleground states within a week or two of the elections? Have you seen the video’s of what went in the counting locations? Have you seen 2000 mules? Etc. Etc.
I totally agree. I was so sad reading this…. And grateful to Sundance for shining the light.
The never-ending tease. If Assange is some sort of threat to someone, it is long past time to unload what he knows and actualize the threat.
Whatever data he has should have been made public long ago. So many people have been in and out of jailhouse conversations with him.
Really tired of people who refuse to name names and lay it all out there, only game-playing with “hints” and allusions that might emerge from cryptic jailhouse interviews. Cowardice, bluffing, or epically delusional sense of importance.
Have no idea what he’s doing or why, but only seems to be creating a fog of mystery. Its to the point whenever I see something about Assange I skip over it,because it will just be a mass of meaningless confusion and speculation.
If I knew who killed JFK and had access to relevant proving records, they would be instantly made public, no law would stop me and the consequences would be irrelevant. All these cowardly people in the three-letter agents “terrified” of making the truth known “because of their families”, career, finances, life, etc. So the world burns on without the truth, taking 100s of millions with it. Disgusting self-centered cowards.
May Assange continue to enjoy his wonderful life in prison in exchange for witholding what evidence he has, because there is nothing in the world more important than Assange’s continued wonderful life in prison.
Assange did “unload” his knowledge. The consequences were irrelevant to him at the time. It is a video of US soldiers killing Afghani’s and journalists from a helicopter that was given to him by the person now named Chelsea Manning. And now look at both of them. I haven’t been in a fog about any of this. I just wonder where have you been all this time that you don’t understand how prosecuted and tortured many humans have been for speaking truth to power?
That’s old news. If they are still after him about something the public has digested and ignored and forgotten about, and the perps have had no consequences, the perps can continue to expect no consequences.
Sounds like the crime he revealed needs to be hammered back into the public eye so people will connect his persecution with the revealed crime so the actual criminals can get back in the mix. Continuing to pursue Assange should be a scalding experience.
But with the ruling class hatred of the US driving policy, US generals testifying to Congress about their perusal of Karl Marx writings, etc. I would think US soldiers committing a war crime would be something they would revel in and use as a further excuse to diminish the US. Like prisoner abuse at Abu Ghraib, etc., which they short-stroked and promoted all over the place. We re so bad, we must change all our institutions, etc.
Something else seems to be going on with Assange.
And my view of persecution and torture for speaking truth to power is shaped not only by personal experience but the well-studied world-view shaping experience of the Nazarene. Screw it. Truth is more important than maintaining lies for personal safety. Not even a question or 3-second pause to consider.
In one of his many interviews and prison contacts over the years has Assange ever been asked “For what reason are the governments of the world so intent on prosecuting you?”
And did he ever answer “Because of this video I obtained that showed US soldiers committing a war crime by killing Afghani’s and journalists from a helicopter” (cue video).
At that point the real crime would be apparent and people would forget Assange in the face of an actual understandable visible crime.
But from what I have heard, he doesn’t do that, only makes cryptically ambiguous statements about other things without mentioning this supposedly central issue, the documented crime of others.
He has said he wouldn’t reveal his source.
He made reference…..and if one had read his releases….you know the source!
That’s not even the crux of it! He knows and has evidence, can prove the Russia Hoax was a hoax! The DNA servers were never hacked by the Russians….they were downloaded onto a thumb drive by a guy named Rich Seth who passed it along to make its way to Assange! Rich was murdered for this reason and made to look like a robery….that wasn’t! Vault 7!
A robbery where his wallet and watch aren’t taken.
Explain this…nuff said.
He says Wikileaks never sits on information. Then vaguely implies Seth Rich was a source. Then refuses to be clear. Wikileaks goes to great lengths to protect its sources he says.
Seth Rich is dead. If he was a source, there is nothing to protect. But there is an injustice to address. He refuses to address the injustice, indicating he has some other agenda (or Seth Rich wan’t a source).
So my explanation is: opportunist dirtbag
Maybe….thats why Tucker is visiting! Bring it back into the public eye…because, it may seem like old news….but is still quite revelant and quite a threat to the IC apparatus and the DNC if it were to come out…even now! Why? Because…its all connected!
that was just a door opener
The video was Iraqis not afghans and a Reuters journalist being mowed down by 30 mm HE.
Exactly! I think some of these folks were not awake back then and missed this. So They need to go back. But if one didn’t start waking up until after the Trump Presidency or even in the midst of it…..this would have gotten by them.
I’m sorry to hear that Assanges unjust unlawful indefinite incarceration is causing you so much fatigue, and aggravation. The ego on that guy eh?
More like cowardice and narcisstic self-interest. He’s had lots of time to think. Doesn’t seem like he’s learned anything or progressed in understanding. Which is sad for him.
do you think if he spoke the full truth that it would gain him his freedom or prevent his death? and then the truth really would be buried. this convoluted situation seems to me to require that alot of people hang together — or they will all hang separately.
Wow……you need to wake up! Just who do you think in this world of evil can he trust with information that could destroy a government? It’s no light thing and you have no idea what goes on behind the scenes. The death threats to family, loved ones, persecution, etc….but when you live in a comfortable bubble…its easy to judge someone else! Do you really think he has enjoyed this life he is living? He knows he can trust virtually no one in government…especially right now…and with our government! And could not truth the Trum administration either…because Trump was being managed by the installed apparatus! But, another term and a more awaken President Trump…hmmmm!
Julian put information out! Plenty! Did you not read and especially look at vault 7! This goes back years…..but if you came in late…you would have missed this.
He did release it..? I have a copy of wikileaks .. it takes a highly analytical mind with lots of time to piece it all together.. Like the marcopolo doc.. all there
highly relevant: there are practically, less than 40 “congressional days” before the end of the year.
Q: what are YOU DOING TO COMMUNICATE YOUR VOICE TO YOUR CONGRESSIONAL MEMBER (HOUSE AND SENATE) TO ABOLISH THE 702 AND USA FREEDOM ACT?
the time to act is now. If you care, pick up the phone and call 100 of your friends…and have them call 100 each of their own…you know the drill.
then call, write and email your members of congress.
make it very very crystal clear: if you refuse to vote NO to continue the USA FREEDOM Act. If you refuse to vote Yes, to abolish the 702 program….your political career is over…finit…no more.
it really is that simple.
pick up the phone and start calling.
do it out of self interest even if none of this julian story is interesting to you.
here is the reality:
do this out of self interest. because unless this madness is stopped, it will ONLY GET WORSE.
God Bless America
Respectfully, regitiger,….
If I am honest with my members of Congress and Senators, there is already pre-existing fact that I will NOT be voting for them, and will be working hard for their opponent, already, before we get to re-authorisation.
Hence, any such threat is an EMPTY threat; 10 x 0, or 100 x 0, is still 0.
But I appreciate the sentiment.
I live in Minnesota, Not worth a phone call to one of my so called reps..
Agree completely. Not a spine among them. While I’m thankfully living well north of the ‘War Zones’, I have no illusions. It’s coming this way.
I follow PLB. You people in Minnesota, and particularly the Twin Cloacae, have my sympathy. You need to consider moving very seriously.
And I’m in Georgia. Pretty much in the same boat as you, paintbrush, even though I have a rep with an R by his name.
mine laugh at me. all the way to the bank.
I recall that President Trump was sympathetic towards Assange. Pompeo did not want him pardoned.
If mem0ry serves me, I think Sundance addressed this.
President Trump needs to stay away from Pompeo, imo.
Will be most interesting and explosive interview. Thanks Sundance for covering this.
Aspen
yes, add nikki haley to the hate and kill assange list too. very vocal about claiming assange as enemy number one.
dc is a strange place…doing the right thing …you ask that question of 100 officials in DC and you get 150 answers!
Thank you, regitiger
DC is a snake pit.
Hillary suggested droning Assange.
Wasn’t Pompeo amongst the turncoats trying to run against PDJT, if only briefly?
For that, he is confirmed forever on the list of enemies of MAGA.
Thanks to Sundance for reminding us of why!
Yes, thats why Pompeo posted all of the accomplishments of the Trump admin, on his own twitter feed.
He was looking to take credit. He met with big donors, lost weight.and then decided not to run.
Woke up and smelt the covfefe. ☕ 😂
This is a great recap. I’m not trying to be critical of it. But for whatever it’s worth a deep dive discussion about Assange and the goings on of 2016 even though it can’t be proven would include at least a footnote about Assange making a vague reference to the murder of Seth Rich in an interview who he called an informant of his. That occurred during a televised interview and Assange stopped himself because he got choked up while saying it. I try to keep an intellectually honest approach to the possibility that an opportunist might look for some tragedy to exploit by being disingenuous about something like this. I’m not saying it’s not possible all I’m saying is that I personally didn’t sense that. Either way despite the whole Seth Rich element being inconclusive it still belongs somewhere in a deep dive about Assange in my opinion. Appreciate what you do SD and please don’t take that wrong.
Re: Assange mentioning murdered Seth Rich was an informant and then stopping because he got so “choked up about it”.
That is so pathetically weak it is mind-boggling. He can’t lift a finger to help himself even when given a microphone and opportunity. Way to make Seth Rich’s death meaningless.
Here he’s been hounded across the world, but becomes so emotional about a potentially key event in history, he can’t bring himself to continue speaking. Poor baby. What about Seth?
Total disgust. Zero respect. Even if being unjustly persecuted. Spineless human being with his endless game-playing. Stupid stupid stupid. At this point who cares what he says, he has no credibility. A weak person like that could say anything. What a weak, total nothing.
WOW. You are so wrong on many levels.
Lemme guess…..Mueller sent you?
Agent Strzok?
If it is Strzock, let me FIFY: that’s Disgraced Agent Strzok.
Wow. I wonder how brave you would be under the same circumstances?
Are you omnipotent?
You know what he knows?
You have total awareness of his motivation and feelings?
Must be awesome to have such power and perception.
You are either AI or a Deep State troll
Or simply an ass.
not that any exclusion is going on…
I don’t agree with all you’ve said about Assange but there is some truth to your sentiments.
I also do not understand why PDJT did not force Assange to testify, be part of the Mueller investigation as a witness for him.
IF Seth Rich was Assange’s source, that’s huge. It would have totally destroyed the Mueller SC and revealed much about the DNC and our corrupt Fed agencies.
It also seems absurd NOT to interview the ONE person who knows, for a fact, who his source was.
Not absurd to me.
He has been imprisoned and at danger of an Epstein-style fake suicide for years.
Why would he play his last and best card?
Why not?
IF Assange could prove Seth Rich was his source while PDJT was POTUS, I would think Assange would be far safer to disclose the truth then. Not now.
Besides… merely keeping quiet was… never any guarantee that Assange would not be “Epsteined.”
Far easier, and safer, to kill Assange than to keep him locked up always worrying if he would find away to disclose things that the criminals inside the US govt and DNC do not want disclosed. He DID imply that Seth Rich was his source.
Nope… something else is going on here. I don’t know what it is … but it clearly makes no sense to keep Assange alive IF he could have disclosed the truth about the DNC hacker.
Agree. Maybe Tucker can provide some clues after his interview with Assange.
Because he started his campaign to be the dealer. If releasing information would cause harm to a person then he has the obligation not too but, if Seth Rich, did give him the info, then after his death he should tell all. If Seth didn’t. Say so.
*claims to have studied the world*
Proceeds to make comically ignorant comments while touting how informed/moral he is.
There are many dimensions to the subject of the Seth Rich murder. For instance, the diversionary argument that there was no robbery, which was designed to lead us away from the possibility that there was a robbery, only not the typical kind. Another question is who got to Rich’s family? Don’t we all want to know what happened to a murdered loved one? Closure, you know. Immediately after the crime the family seemed interested in getting to the bottom of it, and then, suddenly, they weren’t.
There is a lot going on here, and I think Assange can be cut a little slack, as we really don’t know what he’s going through. My guess is that he has a few “insurance policies” planted around the planet that are keeping him alive for now.
Tend to think you’re right. Always wondering why the people who can do something to stop all this madness, doesn’t. Think of all the people who could/should help President Trump but sits on their soft little cushions with a sucker in their mouths. Scums. Wondering if that’s why they won’t tell the average person anything because the average person wouldn’t stay silent. All these big shots with the ‘I know a secret’ makes me want to vomit. Cowards. Never really grasped it until you wrote it but Assange did no favor to Seth Rich by keeping silent. If he gave him the info, he should have acclaimed him a hero when he was murdered but instead he considered his word more important.
There is one item that came to mind after I posted this. Assange might be keeping quiet because of Seth’s parents. They asked President Trump and his son to stop talking about his death. I gathered they were strong democrats. Perhaps its because of them that Assange remains silent.
Hasn’t there been speculation that Seth Rich has a brother who may have been involved in whatever got Seth killed?
To tell the truth, I can’t recall. I do remember something about a brother but nothing more. Something seems to have stopped Assange saying yea or nay regarding Rich that his death did not release him from his word.
” I spoke briefly with General Kelly. Assange would provide information about the purloined DNC emails in exchange for a pardon. No one followed up with me, including General Kelly, and that was the last discussion I had in this subject with anybody representing Trump or his administration”. Dana Rohrabacker.
Wonderful expose Sundance.
It is particularly interesting to see the British 5 Eyes involvement.
Of course the rest of the 5 were/are probably up to their oxters in the corruption.
I have often wondered what happened to the California Senator(?) Diana(?)
Why has nothing been heard from him since?
Good luck to Tucker he will be lucky get out of our top security prison Bellmarch alive.
Dana
Well, that’s a problem.
Kelly worked directly for PDJT at the time.
It’s impossible to believe that Kelly merely refused to obey his boss’s orders and his boss (PDJT) didn’t know that. Of course Trump knew and likely agreed so the question is… why?
There must be a reason Trump also did not demand that Assange be brought into the Russia hoax SC investigation.
And… if Seth Rich really was Assange’s source at the DNC, Assange has taken “keeping a source’s identity secret” … too far. The man is dead likely because he was Assange’s source so Assange DID have an obligation to reveal that information once his source was murdered because he was Assange’s source and Assange DID imply that Rich was his source. Don’t do that criptically. Be direct. Not sure what Assange’s motivation was and is.
General Kelly was President Trump’s SoS at the time.
Rep. D. Rohrabacher, after meeting JA on a personal mission, contacted General Kelly and told him about the possibility of a pardon to JA from President Trump in exchange for the information that would disprove the hacking conspiracy.
Rep D. Rohrabacher didn’t receive a follow up on this matter, not even from General Kelly.
General Kelly was not obeying or refusing to obey orders from President Trump. He was acting on his discretionary power to bring the matter to the attention of President Trump in his capacity of SoS.
He didn’t even answer to Rep. D. Rohrabacher.
The question is … why?
Well, you are making my point. You know these details and does and did PDJT. I was aware that Rohrabacher met with Assange. So we’re you. And we knew this in real time. So, President Trump knew too.
Kelly would have HAD to bring this matter — pardon 4 testimony– to President Trump’s attention… because WE, the public knew. It wasn’t a secret. So, Kelly could not just ignore Rohrabacher and not tell PDT b/c then Trump would know that Kelly couldn’t be trusted as SoS.
Assuming that Kelly kept Trump informed about anything dealing with Assange is unrealistic. Trump was surrounded by traitors in his inner circle, and Kelly has been proven to be one of them. Just because he was a retired Marine general does not make him trustworthy.
Trump did not need… to be kept informed by Kelly re: Assange and Rohabacher’s proposed “pardon” deal b/c we the public knew R met with JA… and therefore so did Trump. Kelly, therefore, could not keep that info a secret from the President.
IMO, Trump gave the order to Kelly to ignore JA, for whatever reason. This is the logistical assumption … even though, yes, Kelly turned out to be a traitor. In this, Kelly did not have the … power… to keep the R meeting w/JA a secret.
Didn’t Assange release the wiki leak emails between Hillary/Podesto/Obama right before the 2016 election. Out of that came “pizzagate”..then the “Q” following, then the pee pee tape..all in the fall of 2016. I remember Hannity interviewing Assange and he offered a 10000 reward for information abot the Seth Rich murder.
The “Q” matter has always bothered me… b/c Trump was asked directly about Q.
President Trump could have said it was BS and then his many supporters would have stopped reading/trusting Q.
Trump didn’t do that.
Instead, he pretty much defended “Q” so that … CAUSED many Trump supporters to continue to follow and trust Q.
Seth Rich.
So why didn’t Pres. Trump offer a pardon to Assange?
Would the UK have refused to extradite him?
Because he was advised by his security team that it wasn’t a good thing to do for the country. Trump put his trust in the wrong people.
…Way too many times.
I don’t know that I agree that Trump… merely put his trust in the wrong people.
Trump is no fool. He is a very smart man.
Assange would have been the primary (and most significant) witness that could have exonerated Trump quickly and exposed a lot of corruption in our govt and in the DNC. Thats simply an obvious reality UNLESS Trump knew that Assange was lying.
I don’t believe the other stuff Assange learned about US attacks on journalists and Afghans would factor into the investigation into the DNC email hack or the Russia collusion investigation. Why would it? It’s totally irrelevant to this matter.
1) He was advised by the RINOs that they would vote to impeach on the hugely unconstitutional post-Presidency impeachment charge if he did pardon Assange and Snowden
2) There is no guarantee that the UK wouldn’t have just locked him up on their own trumped up charges, without Trump in office to oversee things
Why do we keep going over this again and again?
Because truth matters.
Because we have worn out the Dee-sanctimonious high heel debacle. 👠👠
Repetition is well used by coaches and educators to get the principles of their information to remember it and use it properly.
My frustration is with dancing around the edges…always dancing around the edges.
Excellent summary
Free Julian Assange and impeach 44.
👍
Go back to the Pentagon Papers. When Daniel Ellsberg released them, he was accorded a hero. The Supreme court ruled in Ellsberg’s favor.
Assange should have been lauded as a hero. Instead the globalist cabal are making certain he dies in captivity.
Nobody mentions this anymore, but I remember that the news accounts about Seth Rich’s robbery when he was shot, mentioned that he was taken to the hospital by the police. No one knew who he was and how important he was. He was operated on by a surgeon who said he should make it; that the injury wasn’t fatal. This was early in the morning. And then there were reports that suddenly Mayor Bowser and Donna Brazile appeared early in the morning asking about Seth Rich. By the morning, he was dead. When this report came in, they both denied they were there. And of course no one questioned the surgeon. The only interest they had was that Seth was dead. No investigation was necessary.
You are entirely correct on all details. Yet no one followed up with the hospital authorities as to what happened post-surgery. Virtually all of the nurses, residents, and staff would have a story to tell. None of them would be able to keep quiet about details post-op. I’ve worked in a hospital setting and information cannot be suppressed, but moves like wildfire. There has to be an explanation. He was probably in surgical ICU the first night being watched around the clock by multiple medical staff, and would not be released to a regular floor until he was out of danger. His surgeon would know what shape he was in.
Yep.
Are you saying – there was no Russian hookers —— on the bed?
Almost every night. Just not on the nights that Donald Trump was visiting.
A great recap. William Binney already proved that the DNC ‘hack’ was a local download. It will be interesting to see if Tucker goes anywhere near Seth Rich…. By the way, for years we heard that Mike Flynn ‘knows where all the bodies are buried’, and this is why they went after him. I’ve often wondered why those bodies remain buried, and Flynn has said nothing about them…????
Flynn just said Congress are a bunch of paedophiles who are being blackmailed.
He hasn’t been totally silent.
I’d bet money Flynn is right. I don’t think ANYONE gets promoted as a ‘Rat Party candidate unless the ‘Rat Party has something very serious on him/her that they can hold over that person’s head when they need something done.
Thank you, William Binney was the name I forgot. Time stamps and the volume of info proved it couldn’t have been done over the internet. Only a direct connection would allow that volume and speed to be uploaded as fast as it was.
As to all of the “Why haven’ts”…if anyone asking really wants to know, get “The International” on DVD.
First, watch the “extra features” where the writer/directors tell how its based on a true story of the 3rd largest investmant bank in the World, back in the 80’s that not only offered $ laundering, but intel, ‘illegal’ weopons transfers, logistics and even assasinations as ‘services’ to their clients, which included terrorist organisations, trafficing cartels, intel services, and multinational corporations.
And, how it was eventually, quietly shut down but nobody went to prison.
THEN watch the movie.
At one point, this old guy “on the inside” explains “You can not obtain Justice, WITHIN the system, BECAUSE everybody is involved. Governments, Corporations, ..EVERYBODY. THEY will shut down any investigation. So, in order to get Justice, you MUST go OUTSIDE the system.”
Highly reccomend this movie, as it explains so much of what we are seeing now, including identifying WHO is “behind the curtain”.
The Five Eyes were used against Trump and his subordinates. The UK and Australian IC’s were involved. They would send agents in to feed their targets fraudulent intel. Then they would send in another agent, later on, to try and elicit the phony intel from their targets. The coup to take out Trump was always using cut-outs and then back filling when their narratives started falling apart. Papadopoulus was a case in point. An Australian agent claimed a “drunken” Papadopoulus gave up classified information. It’s sop to smear a target. And Steele had nothing to do with the Dossier. It was manufactured out of whole cloth by the FBI and CIA. Nelly Ohr was used because she was an expert at mimicking Russian digital footprints.
The “pee-tape” was real, but it was BJ Clinton who was on it and it was taken when BJ went over to Russia to pick up his $500K bribe.
Good points.
What ever happened to Mifsud and the phone of his that Durham was suppose to have ?
Love me some Tucker emotionally, but he is like cheering for Bill Mayer. Everyone already knows it already. They just want a reporters validation.
The real problem is “everyone” doesn’t know it. The MSM never reported it and the sources that did were not enough to bring the truth to light.
Should be mandatory reading for every citizen, especially all armed services personnel, university students, and high school seniors. The murder of Seth Rich must be fully investigated because those involved are responsible for others.
Such as Epstein.
Seth Rich was murdered by the people that perform the investigations.
Seth Rich was murdered by the people that performed the framing of Trump.
Papadopoulos and Page were low-hanging fruit, only marginally involved with the Trump campaign. The spooks figured they’d be easy to set up and then exaggerate their importance. Flynn, though,was a serious danger to them.
It was glorious to see how Papadopoulos and his crafty wife were savvy enough to leave behind the planted cash with which he was supposed to be arrested.
I can still hear the gnashing of FIB teeth over that one…
I also enjoyed the Mueller gang charging Russian businesses with crimes hoping they would remain silent to keep the Russia thing going. They hired US attorneys and went for discovery, the charges were dropped pronto.
“The truth ain’t in’em.”
Otto von Bismarck — ‘Politics is the art of the possible, the attainable — the art of the next best’
To give it a modern twist: “Anything goes” Do what ever in the f_ck you want to maintain and attain more power especially amongst the globalist demons. Their biggest encumbrance being the West specifically the USA and it’s Constitution with it’s Christian moorings.
Demons work in darkness and Assange was exposing some of their treachery, rules and laws be damned, he has to go. “If” the masses understand this at some point many a swamp rat are done.
“One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors” Plato
Give a casual look at the politicians aka swamp rats, state, federal and around the world, Plato has been proven right yet again.
Yes! I recall Hitlery’s eliminating Assange comment — something like — “Can’ t they just send a rocket into the embassy and shoot him?”
I mangled this, but I found it shocking at the time that she would make a statement of that nature.
She can’t help herself. It’s her “go to” for solving virtually any problem
If I recall it was” can’t we just drone him “
Vice a Walk in the Clouds!
The ticking of the clock…
these people think they’re so smart, and Sundance has them all figured out.
Always has had.
Usually the accused knows their innocence. All the false Russia hysteria of the Trump Presidency must have earned Putin’s contempt. “Empire of Lies” is apt. Is it no surprise that Russia is opposite the US on most everything. The IC created adversary Russia. This is a tragedy, as post USSR, the world could have benefited from a period of great peace if good people worked together. Instead the West leadership attempted to loot the former USSR, and earned the enmity of many.
“The IC created adversary Russia”
So true. Go back to the JFK years and the nuclear threat of Cuba. 10am Tuesday morning alarms going off and students told to hide under their desks.
The whole 60’s race to the moon nonsense. Look into it from a technological viewpoint. Think uniparty and how CCCP and USA both benefitted.
Nuclear fear porn is still being waved over our heads only now it’s the Middle East and China.
This is what I see connected to all that Sundance has revealed and to the invasion of Ukraine. The deep state set up Russia as interfering in the 2016 election. Russia waited for revenge and interfered by invading Ukraine thus intensifying a spotlight on the hidden Ukraine money laundering operation that had been going for some time. It become so convoluted after Biden stole the 2020 election. His regime drew in our military industrial complex and all of our grifting governing bodies, intelligence agencies and stakeholders. The hiding has become more feverish and reached epic proportions. Thus we have the Leftist lawfare crew fully engaged in doing damage to President Trump in illegal lawsuits for whatever they can do to destroy him.
Assange may have incriminating evidence or may become just another distraction to keep We the People away from focusing on the border invasion, the lawfare fiasco, the Biden dementia, the destruction of our Republic and the ability to see clearly what gross evil is intended for all of us. All of the actors in the persecution and trials of President Trump are still alive and working to guard themselves by blaming PDJT and lying their guts off.
I know God sees all. Thanks to Sundance we can begin to understand just how rotten the situation IS!
You can be sure that Russia is an enemy of the USA. Not the only one, but an enemy nonetheless.
My enemy is not in Moscow, its in D.C.
There’s also the Seth Rich question. Was he the link between the DNC servers and Assange?
Yes
Why is CrowdStrike the cyber security firm that the Democratic National Committee chose over the FBI in 2016 to examine their compromised computer servers never mentioned anywhere, or, is my information bad.
So that the DNC could control the information that came out of the analysis.
What is a better question is why the FBI didn’t do their own forensic audit. Imagine the IRS doing an audit and just went with your accountant’s results.
Crowd strike has direct links to the Atlantic Council,
(NATO) and Harvard’s Belfer Center.
Those entities directly link to the information control infrastructure of the Election Integrity Partnership at Stanford’s Freeman-Spogli Center, led by Michael McFaul.
Michael McFaul is one of the many individuals that Russia would like to interview under the terms of the US-Russia Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (MLAT).
Michael Carpenter and William Browder are others. Carpenter was sitting to Bribe ’ems right as he bragged about firing Ukraine’s prosecutor.
The issue of the MLAT was raised at Helsinki and Russia Russia Russia narrative heads exploded.
Speaking of Mike Pompeo, does Jay Sekulow still employ him as the ACLJ foreign affairs expert?
I’m shocked Assange is alive.
I suspect they have their reasons for keeping him alive and thank God he is not in a US prison.
Isn’t it interesting that the threat of a global war breaking out coincides with truth breaking out all over:
1. Debt-driven financial collapse
2. Covid vaccine illnesses and excess deaths
3. Biden Inc blatant corruption
4. Terrorist surge through the open border (I have speculated in the past that foreign, most likely Chinese troops would be needed / used in CONUS to fight seceeding states. I see now their plan is to “enlist” all the foreign males, who will be more than willing to kill Anericans for a paycheck.) Do you have a rifle and ammunition? Food / medical? Potable water?
You will need it, whether or not you want to hear that.
I really hope Tucker is ready to start spilling the beans on behalf of Julian Assange and he is given the opportunity on Twitter X. This ridiculous situation has gone on too long
If Assange tells what he knows about Seth Rich, the entire house of cards comes tumbling down.
Hence why he is still in the gulag
And why Tucker will not “go there”.
“The Weissmann/Mueller report contains claims that Russia hacked the DNC servers as the central element to the Russia interference narrative in the U.S. election. ”
This narrative spewed all over by the MSM from its inception has always been a very large sign of the fraud that is at the center of the Democrat Party.
The DNC! The very all-powerful political network, established by the most brilliant men and women who ever lived, to protect and defend our great “democracy,” could not prevent those big bad Ruskies from hacking their server.
Anyone else see all the fiction lying at the root of this monstrosity?
So was it the undercover DEA or ATF agent that killed Seth Rich?
CIA
John Podesta gave the order, and a fed pulled the trigger.
CIA or FBI
Actually, a C.I. contracted out to two MS-13 killers to do ‘the hit’ and both, along with the C.I. were subsequently eliminated.
2-3 layers of deniability.
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. is an American cyber security technology company based in Austin, Texas. It provides cloud workload and endpoint security, threat intelligence, and cyber attack response services.
The company has been involved in investigations of several high-profile cyberattacks, including the 2014 Sony Pictures hack, the 2015–16 cyber attacks on the Democratic National Committee (DNC), and the 2016 email leak involving the DNC.
CIA
Boss Hog of Drug Running from 1960’s Laos and Cambodia , World Wide
Yahoo, via Michael Isikoff, puts it this way: “Some senior officials inside the CIA and the Trump administration even discussed killing Assange, going so far as to request “sketches” or “options” for how to assassinate him. Discussions over kidnapping or killing Assange occurred “at the highest levels” of the Trump administration, said a former senior counterintelligence official. “There seemed to be no boundaries.”
“of the Trump administration.”
Scenarios of how this reads to a public of Yahoo readers and CNN watchers come to mind: Trump’s people wanted to have Assange killed is the message. Sensible holdovers within his administration evidently prevailed – that time, but it proves once again what a danger Trump is to the country, and that no means of preventing him from running or achieving office should be off limits.
anything yahoo posts is trash and full of lies
why bother reposting any of it?
I don’t read Yahoo. Did you read the Sundance article I pulled it from? The one you and I are commenting on right now?
“Trump’s people”
Who would that be?
Mattis, Tillerson, Kelly, Esper, Barr, Haspel? The list of backstabbing McConnell approved scum is long…
Thanks for the laugh.
I don’t find DS backstabbing traitors funny at all. Sorry you do.
Thank you for staying with this story and writing this. I followed it through your work, but as “They” are counting on, the details were fading in my brain
God bless Sundance!
MAGA 👊👊🇺🇸🇺🇸🙏🏻🙏🏻❤️❤️
Seth Rich rises from the ashes…remember him? When was he snuffed out? Did they find his killer or is the case still “open”?
More answers beget more questions…and the dominos fall.
All these government crooks are evil!! Their day will come. Wow, they have NO conscience AT ALL!!
This is a good read…and reminder of what occurred. I have followed this from the beginning including reading and going through the “vaults” that were released by Julian back when. And I have maintained since the beginning this exact account from the Sundance read above….
And…on top of that having no doubt what so ever in my mind and being…that Seth Rich hacked and downloaded the information on a thumb drive from the DNC servers and passed it along to Assange, maybe through another party…but eventually getting to Assange. This…was why he was murdered and his family was either threatened, or bribed to shut any investigation down. This is the truth. When you really see the depth of what the intelligence apparatus and the DNC went to…even with other countries playing a roll…to keep the Russia narrative going and to subvert Trump,
you begin to see and understand the evil, the corruption, the conglomerate that we the people are up against! It truley is a beast and somehow needs to be exposed and defeated. And remember…the J6 Fedsurrection is another tentacle of that apparatus, it’s deep and it’s ugly and it’s going to take something extremely extraordinary to bring It down. And I believe…we are going to see that happen! This is a war, and so far it’s only for the minds of the people, and as more awaken…thise minds know what is and has been going on…..and that’s a big part of bringing this monster down. It is absolutely imperative that DJT gets back into the White House! And that….along with us awakening is “thier” greatest fear! And we know who I Am referring to! The head of the snake and all of its offspring need to be taken off!
The murder of Seth Rich is another fact that is kept to the side. Nobody wants to face the fact that someone working at the DNC was assassinated for sending the emails to Wikileaks. Who did those leaks damage the most? HRC. Kim.com has mentioned a lot that he knows that the download speed of the email copy indicates that it could only have been a local copy made to a thumb-drive or similar storage device. Everyone who has cooperated to avoid the truth from being pursued on these crimes is complicit. We are no longer the country that we were raised to respect. How do we correct this?
Could it have first been saved to a place for big files – as civil engineering firms were doing in the early 2000’s – when sending a file as an attachment to an e-mail was not really workable because the file was so big – so you put the file on this site and give the other person the location and they can go on there to look at it and also save it, print out the drawings to their printer.
Something that always made my skin crawl
From the Maria Butina deep dive, read this passage:
“Byrne claims he was asked to participate in an FBI intelligence operation and to introduce, and/or facilitate the introduction of, Ms. Butina to the campaigns of Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz and Donald Trump.
In December of 2015 Mr. Byrne said he became suspicious of the FBI motives because he warned FBI officials of the potential that his efforts, his reputation and those who trust him, may result in Butina gaining entry into campaign confidences. The FBI agents told Mr. Byrne that was exactly the intent.
People high up in the FBI wanted Ms. Butina to gain deep access into the Trump campaign. Mr. Byrne became suspicious of a corrupt political motive, but didn’t say anything at the time.
In/around Feb or March 2016 Byrne was told to focus Ms. Butina’s attention to the campaign of Donald Trump and to diminish any attention toward Rubio or Cruz.”
If Mr. Bryne is to be believed, this would seem to suggest there was a political targeting operation underway against all of the Republican perceived frontrunners, that evolved its focus to target the Trump campaign as it became clear he was the leading frontrunner, and Cruz and Rubio had fallen behind. They were prepared to ensnare all of the republican leading candidates in their “russian collusion” net to delegitimize any of them who might emerge victorious over Clinton (insurance policy??)
So, two thoughts:
B. Remember the cabal was calling W Bush illegitimate.
They had to get those machines in place. IMHO.
Personally, Assange should have been pardoned/released a long time ago.
Say his name: SETH RICH
This is why we call her Killary rather than Hillary. Don’t expose them or they will raid your home, sic the IRS on you, put a bag over your head and throw you in prison, or just flat out have you shot by whatever gang will do their bidding – all paid for by our laundered tax payer dollars.
Dear Lord, please put your mighty guardian angels around Sundance, and also Tucker.
Amen
Always wondered why Assange was treated so roughly. Look at the half dozen goons handling an obviously frail man. The animals caught after 9/11 were treated much softer and then pardoned.
And nothing is going to happen to any of the treasonous liars NOTHING
I am glad Julian Assange is still alive. Providence has kept him safe thus far. Seven years after the murder of Seth Rich, no one has answered for it. But seven years gives us an opportunity to see where the names associated with the presidential race of 2016 are today. No one wants to hire or employ a murderer. We can look at who landed on their feet, and who did not.
Brilliant work. What pains me most is how these devils work within our blessed country’s institutions and legal systems to destroy us and advance their personal evil agendas – Betrayal at the highest levels. President Trump knew it and made the selfless decision to walk right in.
Unable to think of a better word to describe what a clear and present danger this thorough report by Sundance presents than this: WOW! Why, I have to ask, wouldn’t Trump pardon Assange? I have always suspected Assange knew how the DNC took out their own employee under the guise of a robbery in DC. (Sorry, can’t recall his name but he was working for DNC and they suspected he was a mole for the RNC and had him killed and I believe Assange knew exactly the details of this murder)
I remember a meeting taking place shortly after the 2020 election between Pompey, McConell and Gina Haspell. I wonder if that’s where they planned a stop to any last minute pardon of Assange by holding the threat of post election impeachment over Trump. I don’t know. It’s all so convoluted and it never seems like anything changes.