For a brief moment I will allow myself to imagine that Tucker Carlson’s research team is aware of the information we have previously provided. If so, an interview with Julian Assange could be exceptionally interesting.
Tucker posts on Twitter that he was visiting with Julian Assange today:
A WALK IN THE VERY DEEP WEEDS….
The Weissmann/Mueller report contains claims that Russia hacked the DNC servers as the central element to the Russia interference narrative in the U.S. election. This DNC hack claim is the fulcrum issue structurally underpinning the Russian election interference narrative pushed by the Weissmann and Muller Special Counsel. However, this essential claim is directly disputed by WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, as outlined during a Dana Rohrabacher interview and by Julian Assange’s own on-the-record statements.
Assange was arrested at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London immediately after the Weissmann/Muller report was released to Bill Barr. Despite investigating the background of the Trump-Russia nonsense, John Durham never touched the DNC hacking claim – the core of the Mueller report. Why? Because Durham knew the U.S. Government threw a bag over Assange to protect the fraudulent Trump-Russia and Russian interference claims.
Again, this reality speaks to the corruption within the John Durham investigation. Durham was protecting Weissmann, Mueller and the core of their justification for a 2-year investigation. Durham knows why Assange was arrested. Durham stayed away from it, intentionally.
The Russians HAD TO have made efforts to interfere in the election, or else the factual basis for the surveillance operation against candidate Donald Trump is naked to the world.
That’s why so much DOJ, FBI and Mueller special counsel energy was exhausted framing the predicate.
“Seventeen intelligence agencies,” the December 29th Joint Analysis Report, the expulsion of the Russian diplomats which was an outcropping of the JAR, the rushed January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment, shoving microphones in everyone’s faces and demanding they answer if they believed Russia interfered – all of it, and I do mean every bit of it, is predicated on an absolute DC need to establish that Russia Attempted to Interfere in the 2016 election.
The “Russian Malicious Cyber Activity – Joint Analysis Report” (full pdf) is pure nonsense. It outlines nothing more than vague and disingenuous typical hacking activity that is no more substantive than any other hacking report on any other foreign actor. However, it was needed to help frame the Russian interference narrative.
There were no Russian diplomats involved; there was no Russian election interference; there was no Russian hacking of the DNC; it was all a fraud created by the intelligence community (IC), FBI and Main Justice to support Hillary Clinton’s lies and then cover their own targeting tracks.
On September 26, 2021, Yahoo News published an extensive article about the CIA targeting WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange in 2017 and the extreme conversations that were taking place at the highest levels of the U.S. government about how to control him.
There is a much bigger story transparently obvious when overlapped with CTH research files on the Mueller investigation and the U.S. intelligence community. Specifically, the motive intentionally not outlined by Yahoo News.
What I am going to share is a deep dive using the resources and timeline from within that Yahoo article and the specific details we have assembled that paints a clear picture about what interests existed for the Deep State, the Intelligence apparatus and the Mueller-Weissmann special counsel.
This fully cited review is not for the faint of heart. This is a journey that could shock many; it could alarm more and will likely force more than a few to reevaluate just what the purpose was for Mike Pompeo within the Donald Trump administration.
As the Yahoo News article begins, they outline how those within the Trump administration viewed Assange as a risk in 2017.
Here it is critical to accept that many people inside the Trump administration were there to control events, not to facilitate a policy agenda from a political outsider. In the example of Assange, the information he carried was a risk to those who attempted and failed to stop Trump from winning the 2016 election.
Julian Assange was not a threat to Donald Trump, but he was a threat to those who attempted to stop Donald Trump. In 2017, the DC system was reacting to a presidency they did not control. As an outcome, the Office of the President was being managed and influenced by some with ulterior motives.
Yahoo, via Michael Isikoff, puts it this way: “Some senior officials inside the CIA and the Trump administration even discussed killing Assange, going so far as to request “sketches” or “options” for how to assassinate him. Discussions over kidnapping or killing Assange occurred “at the highest levels” of the Trump administration, said a former senior counterintelligence official. “There seemed to be no boundaries.”
As we overlay the timeline, it is prudent to pause and remember some hindsight details. According to reports in November of 2019, U.S. Attorney John Durham and U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr were spending time looking carefully at CIA activity in the 2016 presidential election. One quote from a media-voice increasingly sympathetic to a political deep-state noted:
“One British official with knowledge of Barr’s wish list presented to London commented that, “It is like nothing we have come across before, they are basically asking, in quite robust terms, for help in doing a hatchet job on their own intelligence services”“. (Link)
It is interesting that quote came from a British intelligence official, as there was extensive pre-2016 election evidence of an FBI/CIA counterintelligence operation that also involved U.K. intelligence services. There was an aspect to the FBI/CIA operation that overlaps with both a U.S. and U.K. need to keep Wikileaks founder Julian Assange under tight control.
To understand the risk that Julian Assange represented to FBI/CIA interests, and effectively the Mueller special counsel, it is important to understand just how extensive the operations of the FBI/CIA were in 2016. It is within this network of foreign and domestic operations where FBI Agent Peter Strzok was clearly working as a bridge between the CIA and FBI operations.
By now, people are familiar with the construct of CIA operations involving Joseph Mifsud, a Maltese professor generally identified as a western intelligence operative who was tasked by the FBI/CIA to run an operation against Trump campaign official George Papadopoulos in both Italy (Rome) and London. {Go Deep} John Durham ignored him.
In a similar fashion, the FBI tasked U.S. intelligence asset Stefan Halper to target another Trump campaign official, Carter Page. Under the auspices of being a Cambridge Professor, Stefan Halper also targeted General Michael Flynn. Additionally, using assistance from a female FBI agent, under the false name Azra Turk, Halper also targeted Papadopoulos. Again, John Durham ignored it.
The initial operations to target Flynn, Papadopoulos and Page were all based overseas. This seemingly makes the CIA exploitation of the assets and the targets legal and much easier. If Durham went into this intelligence rabbit hole, there would be a paper trail that leads back to Robert Mueller. Durham didn’t go there.
John Durham and IG Michael Horowitz both outlined how very specific exculpatory evidence was known to the FBI and Main Justice, yet that evidence was withheld from the FISA application used against Carter Page and/or it was ignored. The FBI fabricated information in the FISA and removed evidence that Carter Page was previously working for the CIA. This is what FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith was indicted and convicted for doing.
One week after the FBI and DOJ filed the second renewal for the Carter Page FISA [April 7, 2017], Yahoo News notes how Mike Pompeo delivered his first remarks as CIA Director:
[…] On April 13, 2017, wearing a U.S. flag pin on the left lapel of his dark gray suit, Pompeo strode to the podium at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), a Washington think tank, to deliver to a standing-room-only crowd his first public remarks as Trump’s CIA director.
Rather than use the platform to give an overview of global challenges or to lay out any bureaucratic changes he was planning to make at the agency, Pompeo devoted much of his speech to the threat posed by WikiLeaks. (link)
Why would CIA Director Mike Pompeo be so concerned about Julian Assange and Wikileaks in April 2017?
In April of 2017 Pompeo’s boss, President Donald Trump, was under assault from the intelligence community writ large, and every deep state actor was leaking to the media in a frenzied effort to continue the Trump-Russia collusion conspiracy.
The Trump-Russia effort was so all consuming that FBI Director James Comey was even keeping a diary of engagement with President Trump in order to support an ongoing investigation built on fraud – yet, Mike Pompeo is worried about Julian Assange.
Again, here it is important to put yourself back into the time of reference. Remember, it’s clear in the text messages between FBI Agent Strzok and Lisa Page that Peter Strzok had a working relationship with what he called their “sister agency”, the CIA.
♦ Former CIA Director John Brennan admitted Peter Strzok helped write the January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) which outlines the Russia narrative; and it was also Peter Strzok who authored the July 31st, 2016, “Electronic Communication” from the CIA to the FBI that originated FBI operation “Crossfire Hurricane.” Strzok immediately used that EC to travel to London to debrief intelligence officials around Australian Ambassador to the U.K. Alexander Downer.
In short, Peter Strzok was a profoundly overzealous James Bond wannabe who acted as a bridge between the CIA and the FBI. The perfect type of FBI career agent for 2016’s CIA Director John Brennan to utilize.
Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson hired CIA Open-Source analyst Nellie Ohr toward the end of 2015, at appropriately the same time as “FBI Contractors” were identified exploiting the NSA database and extracting information on a specific set of U.S. persons. One, if not the primary extractors, has now been identified as Rodney Joffe at Neustar. “The campaign plot was outlined by Durham in a 27-page indictment charging former Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann with making a false report to the FBI. The plot was also outlined in the finished Durham report. Eight individuals who allegedly conspired with Sussmann but does not identify them by name. The sources familiar with the probe confirmed that the leader of the team of contractors was Rodney L. Joffe.” {Go Deep}
It was also Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson who was domestically tasked with a Russian lobbyist named Natalia Veselnitskaya. A little reported Russian Deputy Attorney General named Saak Albertovich Karapetyan was working as a double agent for the CIA and Kremlin. Karapetyan was directing the foreign operations of Natalia Veselnitskaya, and Glenn Simpson was organizing her inside the U.S as part of his Trump-Russia creation.
Glenn Simpson managed Veselnitskaya through the 2016 Trump Tower meeting with Donald Trump Jr. However, once the CIA/Fusion GPS operation using Veselnitskaya started to unravel with public reporting, back in Russia Deputy AG Karapetyan died in a helicopter crash.
Simultaneously timed in late 2015 through mid 2016, there was a domestic FBI operation using a young Russian named Maria Butina tasked to run up against Republican presidential candidates. According to Patrick Byrne, Butina’s handler, was FBI agent Peter Strzok who was giving Byrne the instructions on where to send her. {Go Deep}
All of this context outlines the extent to which the FBI/CIA was openly involved in constructing a political operation that settled upon anyone in candidate Donald Trump’s orbit. A large international operation directed by the FBI/CIA and domestic operations seemingly directed by Peter Strzok operating with a foot in both agencies. [Strzok gets CIA service coin] Durham eviscerated the predicate for all of this in his report, yet stayed away from the part that leads to Robert Mueller in 2017.
Recap: ♦Mifsud tasked against Papadopoulos (CIA). ♦Halper tasked against Flynn (CIA), Page (CIA) and Papadopoulos (CIA). ♦Azra Turk, pretending to be Halper asst, tasked against Papadopoulos (FBI). ♦Veselnitskaya tasked against Donald Trump Jr. (CIA, Fusion GPS). ♦Butina tasked against Trump and Donald Trump Jr (FBI).
Additionally, Christopher Steele was a British intelligence officer hired by Fusion GPS to assemble and launder fraudulent intelligence information within his dossier. And we cannot forget Oleg Deripaska, a Russian oligarch, who was recruited by Asst. FBI Director Andrew McCabe to participate in running an operation against the Trump campaign and create the impression of Russian involvement. Deripaska refused to participate.
All of this engagement directly controlled by U.S. intelligence, and all of this intended to give a specific Russia impression. This predicate was what John Durham was reviewing in November of 2019, and then released in his final report – while whitewashing the parts that led to the Mueller silo.
The key point of all that contextual background is to see how committed the CIA and FBI were to the constructed narrative of Russia interfering with the 2016 election. The CIA, FBI, and by extension the DOJ and a multitude of political operatives, put a hell of a lot of work into it.
We know John Durham looked at the construct of the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA); and talking to CIA analysts who participated in the construct of the January 2017 report that bolstered the false appearance of Russian interference in the 2016 election. This context is important, because it ties in to the next part that involves Julian Assange and Wikileaks. This is where the motives of Mike Pompeo in mid/late 2017 come into play.
[…] By the summer of 2017, the CIA’s proposals were setting off alarm bells at the National Security Council. “WikiLeaks was a complete obsession of Pompeo’s,” said a former Trump administration national security official. (link)
On April 11th, 2019, the Julian Assange indictment was unsealed in the Eastern District of Virginia (EDVA). From the indictment we discover it was under seal since March 6th, 2018:
On Tuesday April 15, 2019, more investigative material was released. Again, note the dates: Grand Jury, *December of 2017* This means FBI investigation prior to….
The FBI investigation took place prior to December 2017, it was coordinated through the Eastern District of Virginia (EDVA) where Dana Boente was U.S. Attorney at the time. The grand jury indictment was sealed from March of 2018 until after Mueller completed his investigation, April 2019.
Why the delay?
What exactly was the DOJ waiting for from March 2018 to April 2019?
This timeframe is the peak of the Robert Mueller/Andrew Weissmann special counsel investigation.
Here’s where it gets interesting….
The Yahoo article outlines, “There was an inappropriate level of attention to Assange“, by the CIA according to a national security council official. However, if you consider the larger ramifications of what Julian Assange represented to all of those people inside and outside government interests who created the Trump-Russia collusion/conspiracy, well, there was actually a serious risk.
Remember, in May 2017 Robert Mueller and Andrew Weissmann effectively took over the DOJ. The purpose of the Mueller investigation was to cover up the illegal operation that took place in the preceding year. The people exposed in the Trump-Russia targeting operation included all of those intelligence operatives previously outlined in the CIA, FBI and DOJ operations. These are the people John Durham did not indict.
The FBI submission to the Eastern District of Virginia Grand Jury in December of 2017 was four months after congressman Dana Rohrabacher talked to Julian Assange in August of 2017: “Assange told a U.S. congressman … he can prove the leaked Democratic Party documents … did not come from Russia.”
(August 2017, The Hill Via John Solomon) Julian Assange told a U.S. congressman on Tuesday he can prove the leaked Democratic Party documents he published during last year’s election did not come from Russia and promised additional helpful information about the leaks in the near future.
Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, a California Republican who is friendly to Russia and chairs an important House subcommittee on Eurasia policy, became the first American congressman to meet with Assange during a three-hour private gathering at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, where the WikiLeaks founder has been holed up for years.
Rohrabacher recounted his conversation with Assange to The Hill.
“Our three-hour meeting covered a wide array of issues, including the WikiLeaks exposure of the DNC [Democratic National Committee] emails during last year’s presidential election,” Rohrabacher said, “Julian emphatically stated that the Russians were not involved in the hacking or disclosure of those emails.”
Pressed for more detail on the source of the documents, Rohrabacher said he had information to share privately with President Trump. (read more)
Dana Rohrabacher later published this account of the events:
Knowing how much effort the CIA and FBI put into the Russia collusion-conspiracy narrative; and knowing that Assange could essentially destroy the baseline predicate for the entire Trump-Russia investigation – which included the use of Robert Mueller; it would make sense for corrupt government officials to take keen interest after this August 2017 meeting between Rohrabacher and Assange.
That contact between Rohrabacher and Assange explains why those same government officials would quickly gather specific evidence (related to Wikileaks and Bradley Manning) for a grand jury by December 2017.
Within three months of the grand jury seating (Nov/Dec 2017), the DOJ generated an indictment and sealed it in March 2018.
The EDVA then sat on the Julian Assange indictment while the Mueller/Weissman probe was ongoing.
As soon as the Mueller probe ended, on April 11th, 2019, a planned and coordinated effort between the U.K. and U.S. was executed; Julian Assange was forcibly arrested and removed from the Ecuadorian embassy in London, and the EDVA indictment was unsealed (link).
As a person who researched this fiasco, including the ridiculously false 2016 Russian hacking/interference narrative: “17 intelligence agencies”, Joint Analysis Report (JAR) needed for Obama’s anti-Russia narrative in December ’16, and then a month later the ridiculously political Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) in January ’17, this timing against Assange is not coincidental.
It doesn’t take a deep researcher to see the aligned Deep State motive to control Julian Assange, because the Mueller report was dependent on Russia cybercrimes, and that narrative is contingent on the Russia DNC hack story which Julian Assange disputes. Again, John Durham stayed away from it!
♦ This is critical. The Weissmann/Mueller report contains claims that Russia hacked the DNC servers as the central element to the Russia interference narrative in the U.S. election.
This claim is the fulcrum underpinning the Russia election interference narrative. However, this core and essential claim is directly disputed by Julian Assange, as outlined during the Dana Rohrabacher interview, and by Julian Assange’s on-the-record statements.
The predicate for Robert Mueller’s investigation was specifically due to Russian interference in the 2016 election.
The fulcrum for this Russia interference claim is the intelligence community assessment (Peter Strzok); and the only factual evidence claimed within the ICA is that Russia hacked the DNC servers; a claim only made possible by relying on forensic computer analysis from another Michael Sussmann partner, Shawn Henry at Crowdstrike, yes another DNC contractor and collaborator with the Clinton campaign.
The CIA held a massive conflict of self-interest problem surrounding the Russian hacking claim as it pertained to their own activity in 2016. The FBI and DOJ always held a massive interest in maintaining the Russian hacking claim. Robert Mueller and Andrew Weismann did everything they could to support that predicate; and all of those foreign countries whose intelligence apparatus participated with Brennan and Strzok also carried a self-interest in maintaining that Russia hacking and interference narrative.
Julian Assange was/is the only person with direct knowledge of how Wikileaks gained custody of the DNC emails; and Assange claimed he has evidence it was from an inside DNC leak, not from a DNC hack.
The Russian “hacking” claim was ultimately so important to the CIA, FBI, DOJ, ODNI and U.K Intelligence apparatus. Well, right there is the obvious motive to shut Assange down as soon as intelligence officials knew the Mueller report was going to be public. And that is exactly what Main Justice and the U.S. intelligence community did.
This is why John Durham never touched it.
All of them know what happened.
All of them know why Julian Assange was taken from the Embassy in London. A bag had to be thrown over Assange in order to retain the justification for the Weissmann/Mueller special counsel and the larger Russian election interference claims. None of them do not know this. They all know.
Start asking the right questions about the timeline of Assange being arrested. Ask about the DNC hack and Russian provenance according to Crowdstrike. Ask key and specific questions about the FBI working with Crowdstrike and about the DOJ and EDVA case against Assange.
The people around the Deep State all know what happened. SO DO WE!
who killed Seth Rich?
CIA or Clinton Inc?
John Podesta knows.
And if one believes Podesta’s own Wiki-leak emails, he approved the harshest measures, or in his parlance ” wet job”, against leakers and others who damage the HRC campaign.
The guy is evil. Even the artwork he owns says as much.
Yes.
Is there a difference?
MS 13 contract, 2 shooters who were supposed to make it look like a robbery but botched it, then MS 13 offed the shooters in Myrtle Beach, so probably a Clintons hit. Smells kind of vengeful too. Wouldn’t the See I A just do it themselves?
But actually, it was probably the hospital. Rich was alive, talking, and expected to recover until Bowser and Brazile showed up at the hospital and then I believe he had a change of doctor that may or may not be purely coincidence.
Maybe the CIA hired them.
Little clue, CIA caused MS13 to be created in the 1980s during the Central American crisis with Nicaragua and the extrajudicial killings in El Salvador while running cocaine for Iran Contra.
True.
And the cocaine trafficking all goes back to House of Bush. GHWB used his position with the oil business to set it all up for CIA drug trafficking in both central/south America and Asia in the 1950’s and 1960’s.
Government gangsters.
One of them killed Justice Scalia.
Maybe …
https://i-uv.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Seth-Rich-Murder-Whistleblower-Letter.pdf
The Pakistani IT workers, the brothers Anwan possibly killed Seth Rich. Rich hacked the system and they were deeply involved in spying on Congress. Plus they fled the country.
Correction: They were helped out of the country by Mueller and his merry gang, despite one of the wives having more than 10K in cash on her person.
Correction: They were helped out of the country by
MuellerWeissmann and his merry gang, despite one of the wives having more than 10K in cash on her person.Mueller couldn’t testify to anything in the Congressional hearing, which is why the lawyer beside him told him everything to say in response to a Republican question. For Democrat questions, he only had to locate the question and the given answer in his little notebook. Biden has his note cards. Mueller had his notebook AND his lawyer. Biden, Obama, Mueller and Sgt. Schultz all had one thing in common–“I know nuh-think. Nuh-think!”
“Not in my purview” Mueller.
Ms13 hired by the Clinton’s
Let’s not forget the very insane sick weird evil and treasonous CONTENTS of the DNC emails
Pizzagate was constructed like the satanic panic (Meagain and riviera both Fox News redirection artist) to deflect and invert the very real evil in those emails
What else does Wikileaks have? A lot presumably? Assange would be dead by now if there wasn’t one hell of a deadman’s switch
Apparently Seth Rich’s brother passed the material to Wikileaks. Both Bernie bros
One and the same. Seth Rich was executed for leaking DNC emails to Wikileaks. Who actually pulled the trigger is less important than what it represents. The killing was a multi-agency government conspiracy and targeted assassination of a US citizen on American soil to rig an election, subvert the democratic process, protect the interests of the conspiracy, and punish a lowly serf who challenged their power. It is obvious that the motive for and perpetrators of the murder are common knowledge in Imperial City. As Sundance is fond of saying, we should refuse to pretend. The existence of the act and the scope of the cover-up demonstrates irrefutably that America Democracy™️, the Rule of Law™️, and Our Constitutional Rights™️ are a mirage. The only way to remove the cancer that is our current system is to forcibly carve it out of flesh and bone, no matter the price in blood.
Well stated.
The CIA and FBI people who needed to retain the Trump-Russia narrative, because they were conducting a massively illegal spy, surveillance and monitoring operation against candidate Donald Trump.
The justification for that brutally illegal activity, all boils down to a need for Russia to interfere in the 2016 election. Without that predicate, all of their illegal activity against Team Trump is naked governmental abuse of power. A scale of illegal conduct that dwarfs Watergate.
Everything in late 2016 through 2019 was essentially a massive intelligence operation to hide their prior activity, and if any details surfaced to justify it under the false story of Russia interfering in the 2016 election.
Russia, Russia, Russia was needed… or else, their domestic political operation is exposed. That’s why the CIA, FBI and DNI created the December 2016 Joint Analysis Report, and later the January 3, 2017, Intelligence Community Assessment. All of it a complete fabrication needed in the event their activity was exposed. One big fraudulent justification.
From that perspective, Seth Rich was a threat. So those interested intelligence operatives, killed him.
From that perspective, Julian Assange was also a threat. So, those same intelligence operatives manufactured the case against him, worked with their GCHQ allies, and threw a bag over him.
The bottom line. Everything about Russia interfering in the election was a lie. A necessary lie that justified their prior operations against a U.S. presidential candidate.
Once you have that reference point solidly understood, everything makes sense.
💥. There it is. An intelligence operation to cover up a previous intelligence operation.
Attempted coup by the IC.
how deep is the coverups?
how long is the chain of coverups?
pretty damn deep, not just two steps, many many chains of coverups
Trump was coming to drain the swamp, and for many of the establishment elites that means their treason as business model was coming to the end
treason has the ultimate penalty
I take issue with “attempted”. Highly and ultimately successful coup starting with eliminating Gen Flynn, the one man who could have advised President Trump.
The 2020 election steal op was the “highly and ultimately successful” operation.
An illegal intelligence operation to cover up a previous illegal intelligence operation.
bingo.
The American people need to know that the Deep State (FBI, CIA, NSA et al) were doing these things NOT to protect our country and/or allies but to thwart investigation of their own misdeeds . . . and so we have all these people on the side of Hillary and the DNC but I look forward to the day when more will be revealed about Mike Pompeo and John Kelly working so hard to suppress Julian Assange and WikiLeaks.
That’s like asking who the Special Counsel was investigating President Trump. Was it Special Counsel Andrew Weissmann or was it Andy Weissmann dba Robert Muller Special Counsel?
It was done to assure/cover for HRC’s installation in the White House, so either the IC or Clinton Crime Initiative or both working together ‘aka’ DeepState; as to who gave the order, the Clinton COS.
Say all you want about Musk, but they will have a really hard time pulling an Assange on him.
My opinion; Assange is a hero, and he has stood in the breach and faced hellfire for it.
They have tortured Assange. They have done all but kill him, because doing so would be more merciful.
These are terrible, wicked people. There isn’t much nuance here.
It’s more common than you can ever imagine Elon. It’s the only way democrats can win elections and they know it as does everybody else.
EVERY State has at the minimum at least 10% fraud every election!
Minimum.
This has been shown already.
I have been to the States many, many times. Spoke to lots and lots of Americans.
There is no way- without fraud- that a party like the Demorats can win ” elections” . People like Rob Reiner are a minority. Even in left leaning states like Vermont.
The USA was build on the principals of freedom. Not on communism.
Everybody in the world wanted to go to America. Not the Soviet Union.
There is no way the fraudster in the White House got 81 million votes…
Well said
Thank you.
and evidently it is easy.
Fascinating presentation on vote fraud, claiming it was with Dominion machines – Vlad Tepes (vladtepesblog.com)
Mike Lindell has provided reams of evidence of the same, chapter and verse.
Yes he has, and he refuses to give in or give up. Same tenacity and allegiance to the truth as Assange.
God bless these heroes, along with our own truth seeker, Sundance.
#FreeAssange
#Snowden, Too!
Snowden got a Hollywood movie, was originally CIA, and got an unnaturally quick ride up up the ranks to holding the keys to the kingdom. Possibly his parents were farm products or connected too.
At least one source I look to views/viewed Snowden as a black hat. He may have struck a deal to return home. Or perhaps not, having obtained Russian citizenship. I wonder what he gave them in return.
There are many that believe that Snowden was ‘allowed’ to escape to Russia.
Yes, “running” between airports while continuing to use his credit cards un-hindered. Please….
The article below makes a reasonable argument that Snowden was an “op” to reveal to America, “Yes, we’re ignoring the Constitution. Get used to it!”
In other words, a “modified hangout”, rolled up into a hero story for public consumption.
https://www.wakingtimes.com/the-edward-snowden-truth-test/
It raises follow-on questions. Snowden recommended GrapheneOS on android for its security features. Is it because the agency has hooks into GrapheneOS?
They did try to kill him one time.
Before he was arrested, there was an attempted of the Ecuadorian embassy by ‘unknown’ assailants who tried to clandestinely get over the wall, right after threats were made. Was very ‘professional.’
It was spotted & countered, by security but the assailants withdrew and vanished into the night and were never caught.
Musk is data mining via Twitter and selling the patriot social networks to the weaponized Patriot Act agencies
the USA government is Twitters biggest customer for data subscriptions and social marketing campaigns
the Patriot Act requires platform owners and employees to lie about this; see Snowden leaks
Musk is the USA governments biggest contractor (certainly highest profile) SpaceX, Starlink, Twitter, Tesla all completely rely on government subsidies and contracts
wake up people
Musk is owned by the US government and would be nothing without their continual lifeline of subsidies into his companies. I would never trust Elon Musk.
“These are terrible, wicked people. There isn’t much nuance here.”
A+
Looking forward to Tuesday
I’d really like to see Tucker tell the NAZCIA to go eff themselves and interview Putin despite their threats.
A minor correction in the interest of accuracy, Australia’s Ambassador to Britain (and all Commonwealth countries) is titled the High Commisioner.
Julian Assange, knows where all the skeletons are buried. The deep state fears him and even that is an understatement.
Tucker is a fool if he didn’t at least read Sundance’s past posts on Assange.
There is NO ONE who understands the DC deep state, their key players and alliances better than Sundance.
Imagine the questions Sundance could have fed Tucker had he just picked up the phone.
Maybe Tucker should interview Sundance?
Maybe he has read CTH. I think my favorite radio host @WRKO Boston every morning reads him. He has had so many programs that mimic some of the posts from the day before.
My favorite radio host does too on KFYI Phoenix -JT Harris. Show prep on CTH.
OHhhhhhh; I can think of one other, perhaps a world renown businessman, who is known for unprecedented security and intelligence for many decades, who loves this country very much, We shall see what happens in a liddle bit.
Tucker is in there to get it on tape, from the horse’s mouth. And go public with it all. Sunlight kills the vampires.
Or at least, to make certain bad actors fear that.
It should be clear to people by now that Tucker is getting pointed in various directions. And, provided assurances about his own safety and that of his family.
He must have some reason to believe he isn’t going to end up like Gary Webb or Michael Hastings.
Or maybe he’s Tucker 2.0.
I don’t get that impression.
More like, freed from the chains.
There are more good than bad, and some forced rather than volunteered.
I get the impression he really took on board the issues of Life, Death, Faith, and Reality.
Him calling out the church for its fear driven reaction to Sars-CoV2, isolating parishioners and closing churches instead of living the Word in faith that death is not the end, convinced me that he really has faced his mortality and has chosen God. All of which allows him to walk in faith and not fear.
I cannot really say that about any other player in the public eye these last 8 years.
Maybe General Flynn, but I think he was already there. I suppose being a soldier will do that.
Flynn may not be what he seems. Just sayin.
Research recent images of him.
Compare to those of a few years ago even with accounting for aging.
Will look.
Did you see his cameo in the Jimmy Levy song?
Age comes to us all, and stress can age you faster than anything.
“Tucker is in there to get it on tape, from the horse’s mouth.”
It’s extremely unlikely that the British Gov would have given Carlson the permission to record his visit.
Maybe Sundance doesn’t want be interviewed by Tucker.
Thought about that?
Now that would be an interview.
Sundance has said more than once on these pages he’s been offered interviews with prime time Fox News anchors and preferred the freedom his relative anonymity provides him.
His name was outed on live radio by skunk Mark Levin years ago however.
I heard it on my way home from work one evening on his 10pm replay broadcast out of Chicago.
He famously called the Treepers “nut jobs” from the Conservative Nut House. Mocking The Conservative Treehouse obviously.
I’ve never trusted “The Great One” since that evening.
I wonder how often that creep Levin gnashes his teeth over the myriad sundance revelations since that have proven true.
Lisa Page testified in a closed door hearing that Russia never hacked the election China did .
And then there is the still “unsolved” Seth Rich murder — which hangs like an incubus in the air.
Not giving some kind of pardon (whatever he could manage), to Assange and Snowden is one of the few mistakes I think Trump made.
I wonder if Assange would be alive today if President Trump had pardoned him.
Even if they were pardoned, they still would not be safe anywhere in the world.
My man! Bringing it on home.
Seventeen (17) Intelligence agencies aligned against Trump, “an outsider” ‘they’ could not control.
Where have we seen that number 17 before?
The IC in the DS/IC Fourth Branch of government that has superseded the ‘constitutionally’ enacted three branches. Of those 17, which one has its influence in all of the others, domestic and foreign to include the FBI & DOJ? Think Strozck & Ohr as ‘liaisons.’ Little clue – they were not liaisons. One was a domestic station chief, the other a plant. Mary McCord in the background the whole way.
Of all the various agencies and entities repeatedly named in this post, which is the most prevalent, most overarching, most controlling, most exposed, most desperate and has it tentacles in every aspect and is protected more than even the DOJ and FBI?
ALL ROADS LEAD TO LANGLEY!
17…..the loneliest prime number.
And the 7th prime.
Seventh son
Actually, they go from Langley to GCHQ and the City of London
Maybe on GCHQ, but the City, yea.
But first we have a republic/country to save first and wrest control out of the entity here before we can focus on outside forces.
Remove or destroy the CIA and then you can take on the others.
One front at a time. Don’t overextend and get overrun.
17 intelligence agencies, 52 government & military experts , 132 reknown Covid medical prize-winners…
Consensus is not required to prove a fact. Numbers are for PT Barnum’s sucker. ( “sucker born every minute”)
The fact is that thousands believe the earth is flat…….does that change the fact?
If Heaven goes by merit rather than favor, Donald Trump and Julian Assange will get in and those persecuting them will go straight to Hell.
The only way anyone gets into Heaven is by accepting and professing Jesus as your Lord and Savior. By Grace you are saved, not by works.
Your works, however, are one of the signs of God’s grace being present within you.
Claims of having God’s grace without seeing the corresponding works that true faith drives you to perform are just hollow words.
God does not save you based on a merit system or good works. That thought almost drove Martin Luther insane because he felt that he may never measure up. Forget this notion that works has anything to do with God’s saving Grace. The thief on the Cross asked for God’s Grace just before he died and he was saved from hell. The thief had no time to go forth and perform good works to prove to God that he meant what he said.
My point was, “you will see works from people with God’s grace because His grace instills that drive in them.”
People who claim to have God’s grace, but wallow in sin are just lying to themselves.
If your heart is not on fire to do the Will of the Lord (i.e. to perform works), then you don’t actually have God’s sanctifying Grace upon you.
Matthew 7:16-20
“16 You will know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes from thornbushes or figs from thistles? 17 Even so, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. 18 A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit. 19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. 20 Therefore by their fruits you will know them.”
Perfect.
The State-Ordered Torment of Julian Assange, JournalistBY: DIANA WEST
–
Now that a blob in a wig in a London courtroom has issued the order to send Julian Assange to the Soviet State of America, where the FBI is the Cheka, the courts are kangaroo, a coup took the White House, and journalism is propaganda, all that is needed for extradition is a rubber stamp.
That rubber stamp is expected to fall by May 18 from the hand of the UK Home Secretary. That would mean the Wikileaks publisher would be transported to the US to stand trial and face up to 175 years for committing journalism — journalism that harnessed the Internet as a tool of exposure, not as a weapon of control. The Sovietized state of America styles the vital work of Wikileaks “espionage.”
Dark days for us all, but for Assange, the man, father and husband, life is a void of continuing darkness and deceit — and uninterupted torture.
Why? Why? Why this distortion of all due process against this one man? (And if he is extradited, as expected, will he join the J6 political prisoners, also tortured and deprived of due process, in the DC Gulag?) Most explanations for the wrath of the state(s) focus on the video released by Wikileaks, “Collateral Damage,” which shows leaked video of war crimes in progress as a US air crew shoots at unarmed and wounded people, including children, on the ground in Iraq.
As shocking as the video is, I don’t believe it can possibly be the driver of the war on Assange. I’ve covered numerous cases in which US soldiers were zealously prosecuted and incarcerated for war crimes by the US during the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. After following many of these trials, I have to conclude that the US government, far from being loathe to prosecute, is often willing, eager and even salivating to prosecute troops for alleged crimes committed on the battlefield. Indeed, these trials seemed to be used as a means of currying favor with our Muslim “allies.”
I believe there are other reasons for the vendetta against Assange, elite-centered, not troop-centered reasons, reasons having to do with the insurrectionary powers of transparency as practiced and perfected by Wikileaks. The reasons undoubtedly multipled since the initial legal assaults on Assange over fake rape charges began in 2010, eventually driving him to seek asylum inside the Ecuadorian Embassy (2012-2019). They certainly included the masses of Wikileaks that destroyed Hillary Clinton, the Podestas and the DNC. Would Donald Trump have been elected without Wikileaks? I doubt it. Should he have issued a presidential pardon to Assange before leaving office? Ten thousand times YES.
https://dianawest.net/Home/tabid/36/EntryId/4466/The-State-Ordered-Torment-of-Julian-Assange-Journalist.aspx
Even more interesting at this point:
Why did Tucker Catlson tweet that out?
Why was Carlson allowed in by the Brits, who have just as much interest in shutting Assange’s mouth as anybody?
Who isn’t sleeping tonight?
Who is placing many phone calls?
I guess Tucker must feel like he has top notch personal security.
Chess move.
was curious about this as well.
if he were to get that interview with Putin he would have to be crafty.
Queen Elizabeth’s death was announced 1776 days after the first Q post. Look it up. You think GCHQ has been put in submission? My guess is yes….
May be an op.
I wonder if some other ‘entity’ is monitoring and recording those phone calls and copying emails and texts from certain other entities.
Panic in DC.
👁️
Thank you Sundance.
Perfect summary
This one should be blasted through as much censorship as possible.
“Good Lord willing and the creek don’t rise”
So why is Tucker now being allowed to talk to Assange? Are the latest Biden banking records SO bad that they will allow the truth that Trump didn’t “collude” with Russia to dominate a news cycle or two?
HA that would be a funny reversal of fortunes.
Maybe to keep Ma Barker from making a move when Barry dumps the Puppet.
Holy cow. This is potentially incredible.
“an interview with Julian Assange could be exceptionally interesting.”
Looking forward to it.
Might set some records for viewing.
Let’s hope so….
“There were no Russian diplomats involved; there was no Russian election interference; there was no Russian hacking of the DNC; it was all a fraud created by the intelligence community (IC), FBI and Main Justice to support Hillary Clinton’s lies and then cover their own targeting tracks.”
Just wondering if any of this might be tied to Ukraine. If the Russians are already thoroughly discredited and evil for everything bad that befalls the US, would it smooth the way for other actions happening at a later time?
Both sides of the political aisle were involved in Ukraine for a few years before 2016.
Leading up to and after PDJT was elected, it was shocking how hard the Derp State went after Russia blaming them for everything and anything nefarious that happened without any regard to how Russia might react.
Real and created Russian bogeymen were everywhere and responsible for everything and still are beyond reason and logic.
Did PDJT just delay something the Derp State intended all along?
As the Deep State was deceiving much of the nation, it also continued to trick a good many of its own willfully blind followers. The scapegoat was yet again Bad Vlad. Whenever anything went wrong for the Deep state, it became usual to attribute it to Bad Vlad. In fact many of their claims begin to sound completely ridiculous to the objective mind. Of course, the Deep State’s minions in the Shill Squealer Media Propaganda Ministry’s mission is to keep everything clouded and misdirected in the minds of their sheeple as they are led to servitude and ruin.
Of course it’s tied to Ukraine. Russiagate wasn’t just about smearing Trump and derailing his presidency, it was also about demonizing Russia and propagandizing the American public into accepting the narrative that Putin’s Russia is this cunning, all-powerful but also very weak, entirely defeatable enemy that never stops looking for ways to attack us.
Putin’s intervention in Ukraine started when it did because the Kiev regime, which is just a puppet regime that acts at the direction of our Neocons, MIC grifters and corruptocrats, was massing its troops in the Donbas and massively ramping up its shelling of the ethnic Russian civilians living there. Biden’s spokesgoons were as confident as they were that the Russians were going to attack Ukraine because they knew their Ukrainian puppets were poke the bear so hard in just the right spot that he’d have to respond. This was all a little project that the neocons had been working on for years. Actually triggering the war had to wait until the neocons had all their pieces in place, and the Russiagate hoax was one of the ways they set up the board.
It’s revolting to see our government behave this way on our behalf, but I can’t help but feel a kind of enjoyment at seeing yet another one of the neocons’ grand projects go completely tits up. At some point, I have to believe that enough people will realize that these neocons are just a gaggle of clueless clowns that they’ll eventually be frogmarched out of the Swamp wearing barrels and dunce caps glued to their heads.
Thank you for such great research and recollection re: the Russian-collusion facts. Fascinating read triggered by a Tucker visit to meet with Assange. I will reread this article and explore the links.
Seth Rich!
Brilliant analysis! A spectacular story. The corrupt, bad guys got away with it too. Unbelievable.
Why didn’t Trump pardon Assange?
Being pardoned and being protected from those that engineered one’s incarceration are quite different matters.
Spot on.
Why isn’t Assange conveniently dead in British custody?
Did President Trump perhaps extract an agreement on his “make the royal family kiss my grits” visit to England?
Because McConnel told him the Senate would convict him for impeachment, that is what I read or heard somewhere.
Now this ^ makes sense and sounds wholly believable.
Authoritative recap by Sundance, as usual.
There is one more wrinkle, of course.
When Seth Rich leaked Hillary’s emails, Dirty FBI agent Shawn Henry’s CrowdStrike forensics team was brought in to blame Russia for the “hack”. The FBI supposedly took their word for it. When Bill met Loretta on the Tarmac, Seth had only a week to live.
Her hitmen put 2 slugs in his back at 3 am when he was walking home from a DNC party. They didn’t rob him because they wanted to send a message; don’t rat out Hillary. She even used the murder to push gun control. And much later, CrowdStrike admitted they were only “guessing” about Russia.
But Hillary desperately, desperately needed it to be Russia who hacked her emails. Because if it was Seth Rich, and it was, she looks good for his gangland execution.
Which she is.
Boom.
You know, the FBI still has his laptop in its custody, and is still fighting even now to not turn over the contents. Ongoing lawsuit.
“We can’t comment on the kidnapping, Mr. Lindbergh.”
… and she still lost.
M
I opined IC (CIA) upthread, but forget about me.
Scroll back upthread to see Sundance’s reply to another commenter.
💥🎯
It would be wonderful if some surveillance video of the outside of the DNC party were discovered. This is the first time that I read that there was a DNC party the night of his murder.
Can someone here tell me if Pompeo is a white hat or black hat guy? I can’t get my mind around him. On one hand, he comes across as a deeply moral/spiritual/patriotic guy. However, his walk often doesn’t match his talk. My gut feeling is that I would NOT want to share a foxhole with him if things were dicey or dangerous. I wish Sundance would elaborate more fully on Mr. Pompeo.
Double Black.
Double black diamond and moguls!
I think he just did. Black hat
“My gut feeling is that I would NOT want to share a foxhole with him if things were dicey or dangerous.”
CORRECT.
.
Pompeo has ties to the law firm of Williams & Connolly (check out their clients), where he worked after law school, and then, among others, Bain Capital (Mitt Romney) who helped boost his actual career and fortune in the aerospace industry. He’s been plugged into the insiders from the time he was a young tyke using the GI bill to go to Harvard after he finished his uneventful 5-year-required stint as an armor officer in Europe post-West Point.
.
There are no white hats in DC.
Another post bookmarked for re-reading time and again. Thank you, SD.
Thank you, Tucker. Russia hacking claim never made sense, it is important to figure this out on our own. Julian Assange can help.
Excellent post Sundance………………..just excellent!
March 02, 2017 AG Jeff Sessions recuses himself from investigation of Russia-campaign ties
May 17, 2017 Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein appoints Robert Mueller as Special Counsel
Feb 14, 2019 William P. Barr is sworn in as the AG of the United States
May 29, 2019 Special Counsel Robert Mueller III announces he is officially closing the Special Counsel’s Office
June 3, 2020 Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein testifies to Senate Judiciary Committee – Russia Probe – that he conducted no oversight over the Muller probe
There are VERY nervous people watching this right now that dont want to see ANY interviews take place.
I would be very surprised if it will happen at all.
Perhaps the interview took place before the announcement.
Like anyone can just walk in and see Julian without the 4th branch clearance ?
Another ploy to make people believe in this faux patriot like Elon.
Sanjac: Yup. Two globe-trotting, gubmint-connected hucksters.
I wonder if Gen Kelly ever told President Trump about the offer made by Assange through Congressman Rohrabacher?
LOL. Ya think?
The guy who President Trump “fired like a dog?”
Keep an eye on those dog references btw. So far we have Kelly and Al Baghdadi. Any others?
Looking for the common denominator, but I have a theory.
I thought Rohrbacker spoke with Trump directly.
Maybe I’m mistaken.
From the report by Rohrabacher that Sundance posted above:
“Upon my return, I spoke briefly with Gen. Kelly. I told him that Julian
Assange would provide information about the purloined DNC emails in exchange for a pardon. No one followed up with me including Gen. Kelly and that was the last discussion I had on this
subject with anyone representing Trump or in his Administration.
10-4
I wonder how close the CIA came to murdering Senator Frank Church.
Mike Pompeii was always an establishment/IC plant tasked to “handle” Trump.
He was remarkably successful.
He will be alright as long as he doesn’t directly expose the Uni parties election fraud schemes. Thats the deal…
in case by chance you were wondering why he never does anymore.
Sometimes Justice is slow.
But it swings eventually.
Wisconsin House Speaker has advanced Articles of Impeachment filed against Wisconsin Election Administrator Meagan Wolfe after she allowed illegal ballot drop boxes all over the state and illegally enabled voting in nursing homes, resulting in massive fraud. – Finally
A lot of people say Assange is close to death.
Did he bring him Tea and Crumpets or Banger’s and Mash
hes could be wearing a wire.
Is that Tuckers wife? Who is that woman with hm?
It may be Stella Assange.
Thanks.
First off, quoting Micheal Isikoff, a MOSSAD paper boy, as someone to be taken seriously or credibly, doesn’t help your credibility Sundance. Also, Strock/Stroke/Smirk ain’t no CIA wannabe, that M’f’er IS CIA. For starters, he never went to the FBI Academy (look it up), He grew up in Iran and is allegedly quite fluent in Farsi, his lawyer f##k buddy’s mom is Iranian. You think Uranium 1 issues might be in play here, and that is why Durham was fenced out? Assange knows that Mueller was neck deep in Uranium 1, he documented it. When a platoon sets up to ambush a company sized patrol, you get one chance to pull it off. If the claymores/machineguns open up too early while the rear of the column can still maneuver, they will kill your ass. Don’t be the loser private that clacks off the claymore too soon.
Uranium One, the Clintons, Mueller, Iran, NK nukes, and pallets of cash could in fact be an even more (cough) explosive topic of Tucker/Assange conversation than the Wikileaks one at this moment in time.
As we all wonder whether Iran has nukes ready to launch at Israel and if so, what was the source of their uranium.
Interesting thought. Very interesting.
Nukes!
We’ve been hiding under our desks on that fear since the 60’s!
Believe me, that ain’t ever happening!
I can appreciate and agree with a lot of the facts you brought up, but impugning the credibility of one of the most consistently accurate, well respected and rarely mistaken investigative journalist/bloggers is a little over the top.
You make it sound like Sundance’s credibility has been in question. And like he doesn’t know what he’s doing.
That’s a non-starter.
He’s pretty good at this, has been and far from a loser.
On the other hand, you can start your own blog and educate us all.
The tone was not gracious towards Sundance and the deciphering a bit difficult, but Isikoff was, I believe, a water carrier for the Russia Hoax along with David Corn, so there’s that.
Sundance is a big boy.
Darrell does make a very interesting point about Assange and and U1, and the possibility that Durham was walled off for a good reason.
To everything there is a season. Right now, it looks like Iran season.
And nukes season.
Even bigger, much bigger, than Clinton and Wikileaks is what the DS was spinning up in the dark around the supply and use of nuclear weapons. When President Trump talks about it, he as much as says his 2016 election avoided a nuclear war.
Timing. The timing is key.
I guess we will find out soon enough.
Credibility?
Ha!
Try and keep up.
I totally loathe our f-ing Government. Nothing short of annihilation would satisfy me at this point. If we want to Make America Great Again, we have to get rid of DC. It’s a plague on this country and it’s been that way since the 1890’s. If we manage to survive our Aristocraps, if DJT wins his third election and gets to serve his second term, he should take it apart brick by brick and move it to Southern Kansas. It would represent the center of our country. It would also put every single lawfirm on K Street out of business and DC would be the shithole it actually is. He IS a builder, what a great way to use his abundance of talents
“I am your retribution.”
https://truthsocial.com/@georgekennedy/posts/111338176480267171
Team Obama/Pelosi/Biden sure freaked out when Trump mentioned CROWDSTRIKE in the infamous Trump phone call to Ukraine President Zeleksyy.
They sure buried even a mention of the CROWDSTRIKE connection in that phone call, and instead turned it into a totally phony Trump impeachment hysteria .
I love how the occasional Crowdstrike commercial comes on during a sporting event.
Trying to normalize that company name like it’s some trustworthy internet security company.
It’s widely believed that Seth Rich copied the files from the Dem server and leaked this info to Assange. Rich is believed to have been assassinated by CIA contractors/mercs. That’s what Tucker needs to ask Assange
While Democrats were screaming Russia-Russia-Russia, we should have been screaming Crowdstrike-Crowdstrike-Crowdstrike.
Crowdstrike was another massive and intentional misinformation ruse, just like the Intelligence community ruse and Hunter’s lap top.
Speaker Mike Johnson Hires DeSantis Donor and Big Pharma Lobbyist as Policy Director
https://loomered.com/2023/11/02/exclusive-speaker-mike-johnson-hires-desantis-donor-and-big-pharma-lobbyist-as-policy-director/
Could be something, or could just be Tucker’s idle curiosity, which he possesses in abundance. It’s hard to believe at this point that Assange would still be holding onto information of any value. or, more to the point, any proof. If he had it, he’d have released it long ago.
The question of all questions is: what’s in the emails?
Why did Samantha Powers unmask the names of hundreds of US citizens picked up during FISA court surveillance, during the 11th hour of the Obama administration. She had no need to know any of this as the outgoing UN Ambassador.
Yet she was immediately rehired by Biden to run USAID- always known as a CIA front.
How did Samantha Powers get to just skip away, untouched by her own complicity and signatures on these FISA unmasking request documents?
And naturally, who was Joseph Mifsud – the lynch pin in this entire operation against Trump.
They always get away with it. In the rare instance one of these cretins gets caught red handed (Sandy Berger, Kevin Clinesmith) they get a slap on the wrist.
They control the legal system that would ordinarily hold them accountable. No one pays a price, except the little people like us. For all the theater of the event, I think J6 really scared the hell out of the ruling class. Because we’re ALWAYS the law and order people. We have something to lose. They saw that day what – potentially – could have happened when a large enough crowd of us gathers in DC.
Ep. 1-35 of “Tucker on X,” and other videos of Tucker Carlson, with Mike Pence, Ron DeSantis, Nikki Haley, and et cetera.
https://tuckercarlson.com
https://tuckercarlson.com/videos/
(Ep. 36 is maybe Tucker´s assumed interview with Julian Assange.)
Why didn’t Trump pardon Assange?
pompeo and others advised him to keep out of it for one. this a fact.
I am not going to dismiss this as just a simple error in judgement. I’ve been clear about this issue 100 percent. President Trump is a human being. He is not superman. We tend to expect him to make perfect judgements on everything we have stored up for years before he came on to the scene and led the maga movement. It’s important to remember just how much bitter corrupt power players exist in washington dc, in his orbit that quietly worked very hard to see him fail. It is nothing short of a miracle President Trump was capable of accomplishing what he did happen.
tldr: in a normal world, President Trump and any reasonable President for that matter would extend a pardon to Assange. He published the truth. He is a journalist and publisher. You cannot make that a crime and remain consistent with US constitutional doctrine.
noting: I’ve PLEADED over 40 times to President Trump and his staff to broker a pardon. unsuccessful and it stresses me out that no one seems to understand the gravity of not making a right choice and doing the right thing.
God Bless America
At some point we’ll know for sure where Tucker falls in this storyline.
Just like Elon is starting to be exposed as Jack Dorsey 2.0
I sure would like to fly one of those “Magic Cars” of his into space however! 🤣😂😝🤪😜
At some point we’ll probably be attacked by aliens from outer space when they run out of fear porn.
Tucker Carlson can reveal credible, even unequivocal, information given to him by JA that damns the deep state, and all of it will not induce any meaningful, negative consequences to the perpetrators so long as the current administration is in power. Moreover, the msm will treat it as Hunter’s laptop v. 2.0.
If PDJT wins reelection, I won’t be surprised if JA is dispatched prior to inauguration day, 2025, no doubt succumbing to suspicious natural causes or suicide. JA probably knows his mortality is on a fast approaching horizon, and he may have decided to “tell all” to Carlson with the hope of his knowledge not dying with him.
I wonder what time restriction applies to the interview’s duration, is it limited to being a one-off event, and may JA pass written, uncensored documents to Carlson that will remain in his possession?
I wonder if Assange still has an unscrambled brain? You’d think the powers that be would be pumping him with LSD 24/7 by hiding it in his food. I will be stunned if Tucker Carlson can even meet with Assange and even more so if he learns anything. Maybe Assange finally broke and will play ball with the Deep State? I hope not.
assange is on very poor health. diminished physically, mentally, emotionally. JUST AS THE CORRUPTORS INTEND.
he will never be extradited. ever. He will remain in that prison awaiting a negotiation between the US and UK that will forever be embroiled in controversies and legal disagreements. BOTH STATES WILL SEE TO IT THAT HE DIES IN PRISON, a grave chilling and dangerous message to anyone who dares to publish the truth.
God Bless America