Operation Condor – How NSA Director Mike Rogers Saved The U.S. From a Massive Constitutional Crisis…

This outline is the story of how the FBI Counterintelligence Division and DOJ National Security Division were weaponized. This outline is the full story of what House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes is currently working to expose.  This outline exposes the biggest political scandal in U.S. history.  This outline is also the story of how one man’s action likely saved our constitutional republic.

His name is Admiral Mike Rogers.

I’m calling the back-story to the 2016 FISA 702(16)(17) political corruption by the Obama administration “Operation Condor”.  Those of you familiar with the film “Three Days of The Condor” will note how the real life storyline almost mirrors the Hollywood film. For the real life version, NSA Director Admiral Mike Rogers plays the role of “Condor”.

“SCIF” – a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility. To understand the larger FISA 702(16)(17) issues in 2016 it is important to focus on the word “compartmented”.

Intelligence information is housed by compartments within the larger intelligence community network. Each intelligence unit holds intelligence unique to that compartment and task. The FBI Counterintelligence unit would hold the intelligence information specific to their task or assignment; the DOJ National Security Division would hold their own compartmented intelligence; again, specific to their task and objectives. So too would the DOJ, DoD (Pentagon), State Dept., or CIA.

This compartmented structure is what led to the creation of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, ODNI. The 911 commission recommended the office to serve as a hub able to ensure intelligence sharing; that is – to ensure intelligence was not intentionally withheld from other compartments when needed.

In 2016 the ODNI for President Obama was James Clapper.

It is doubtful the 911 commission ever gave thought to what might happen when intelligence is weaponized as a political tool. The DNI is a political appointment, a cabinet member, of the President.  If the executive branch, the President, wanted to weaponize intelligence as a political tool, he/she would have control over such weaponization as an outcome of their political appointees within the: FBI (Comey, McCabe), DOJ (Lynch/Yates), CIA (Brennan), DNI (Clapper), or DoD (Ash Carter), etc.

The civilian (representative) oversight into the compartmented intelligence falls to a very select group known as the Intelligence Gang of Eight.

Four Democrats and Four Republicans (four minority party and four majority party political leaders) for a total of eight. Four from the House and Four from the Senate. –Understand the Gang of Eight Here– The Gang-of-Eight can, if they choose, interact with the intelligence product with the same level of security clearance as the compartment being reviewed.

Only these eight members can interact with the intelligence product in this way. This ensures their ability to conduct oversight.

It is critical to understand the difference between the House Intelligence Committee, the Senate Intelligence Committee and the Gang of Eight. Only two members from the House Intelligence Committee (chair and minority), and two members of the Senate Intelligence Committee (chair and vice-chair) are participants. The other four are Speaker of the House, minority leader of House, Leader of Senate and Minority leader of Senate. The latter four are not part of any other intel committee.

On March 20th 2017 congressional testimony, James Comey was asked why the FBI Director did not inform congressional oversight about the counterintelligence operation that began in July 2016.

FBI Director Comey said he did not tell congressional oversight he was investigating presidential candidate Donald Trump because the Director of Counterintelligence suggested he not do so. *Very important detail.*

I cannot emphasize this enough. *VERY* important detail. Again, notice how Comey doesn’t use FBI Counterintelligence Director WH “Bill” Priestap’s actual name, but refers to his position and title. Again, watch the first three minutes:


FBI Director James Comey was caught entirely off guard by that first three minutes of that questioning. He simply didn’t anticipate it.

Oversight protocol requires the FBI Director to tell the congressional intelligence “Gang of Eight” of any counterintelligence operations. The Go8 has oversight into these ops at the highest level of classification. In July 2016 the time the operation began, oversight was the responsibility of this group, the Gang of Eight:

Obviously, based on what we have learned since March 2017, and what has surfaced recently, we can all see why the FBI would want to keep it hidden that they were running a counterintelligence operation against a presidential candidate. After all, as FBI Agent Peter Strzok said it in his text messages, it was an “insurance policy”.

REMINDER – FBI Agent Strzok to FBI Attorney Page:

“I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office that there’s no way he gets elected – but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk. It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40.”

FBI Director James Comey told congress on March 20th, 2017, the reason he didn’t inform the statutory oversight “Gang of Eight” was because Bill Priestap (Director of Counterintelligence) recommended he didn’t do it.

The originating intelligence agency agency, in these examples the DOJ National Security Division and/or FBI Counterintelligence Division, holds the proprietary intelligence they create in their SCIF.  They may also receive intelligence products created for them, which they will also host in their unique SCIF. Thus, intelligence is compartmentalized.

In 2015 Sally Yates blocked any inspector general oversight of the DOJ National Security Division (SEE Pdf HERE).  The Office of Inspector General. Michael Horowitz, requested oversight over the DOJ National Security Division and it was Sally Yates who responded with a lengthy 58-page legal explanation saying, essentially, ‘nope – not allowed.’ (PDF HERE) All of the DOJ is subject to oversight, except the NSD.

The White House -the executive branch- is also a host of intelligence information and consequently the White House has their own SCIF which holds intelligence products they would create (very little), or intelligence products created for them (the vast majority).

An example of a product created for the executive branch would be the President’s Daily Briefing (PDB).

The PDB as a whole product would only exist in the White House SCIF. Parts of the PDB would be hosted by the originating participant, ex. NSA, FBI, DOJ, DoD, CIA State Dept. etc., but only the White House would have the fully assembled product. After all, it’s assembled for the President.

Putting the “Oversight” structure together with the “Compartmented” intelligence security you will note that only a few people ‘could’ traditionally access the full PDB.  However, under President Obama the President’s Daily Brief went to almost everyone at top levels in his administration.  Regarding the Obama PDB:

[…]  But while through most of its history the document has been marked “For the President’s Eyes Only,” the PDB has never gone to the president alone. The most restricted dissemination was in the early 1970s, when the book went only to President Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger, who was dual-hatted as national security adviser and secretary of state.

In other administrations, the circle of readers has also included the vice president, the secretary of defense and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, along with additional White House staffers.

By 2013, Obama’s PDB was making its way to more than 30 recipients, including the president’s top strategic communications aide and speechwriter, and deputy secretaries of national security departments. (link)

Pay attention to that last part.  According to the Washington Post outline Obama’s PDB’s were going to more than 30 recipients including: “Deputy Secretaries of national security departments”.

During an MSNBC interview about her unmasking U.S. citizens within intelligence reports, in April 2017, President Obama’s National Security Adviser, Susan Rice, defined the Obama national security departments to include: “State” – “Defense” (Pentagon includes NSA) and “CIA”….

So under President Obama’s watch Deputy Asst. Secretaries of Defense had daily access to the PDB.  An example of an Obama Deputy Asst. Secretary of Defense, Evelyn Farkas.

With dozens of people having access to President Obama’s PDB, Rice’s unmasking of names within the intelligence product gave dozens of people direct access to unmasked intelligence – including Obama officials who could, likely did, use the PDB for specific and intentional political purposes.  This political outcome was essentially confirmed by Evelyn Farkas who was one of the downstream recipients of the unmasked intelligence.

If the House Intelligence Committee, or Senate Intelligence Committee, as a whole – wanted to see the President’s Daily Briefing, they would have to request the individual components from the individual intelligence agencies because the PDB product was not created for them; it was created for the Office of The President.

Only the Chairman and Minority leader from each Intel committee could go to the White House to see the PDB end product. [Remember, they alone are four of the Gang-of-Eight.]

This is why Devin Nunes, who is a Go8 member, has to request the intelligence from each department (NSA, DOJ, FBI etc.) in order to share it with the oversight committee. Nunes can review the ‘executive SCIF product’ but cannot export or import intelligence product he did not create.

The Congressional SCIF would then hold the compartmented information after delivery for the committee members to review under very tight controls. The intelligence is removed/deleted after review. No systems are connected.

Our research indicates that in February and March 2017 Chairman Devin Nunes, a gang of eight member, reviewed intelligence reports (most likely PDB’s) that were assembled exclusively for the office of the former President (Obama). That is why he went to the Eisenhower Executive Office Building (EEOB) Information Facility to review.

The intelligence product would be delivered to that SCIF system for his review, most likely by the ODNI (Dan Coats) or NSA (Mike Rogers).   It would be removed from that SCIF system after Nunes review, (no systems are connected).  It is important to note here that President Trump nominated Senator Dan Coats as ODNI on January 5th, 2017 – however, Democrats held up that nomination until March 16th, 2017.

It is not coincidental that immediately following DNI Dan Coat’s ability to provide that information Chairman Devin Nunes first reported his concerns. After Devin Nunes review the information March 22nd 2017, Nunes stated the intelligence product he reviewed was “not related to Russia, or the FBI Russian counter-intelligence investigation”.

House Intelligence Committee Chairman, Devin Nunes, then held a brief press conference  and stated he has been provided intelligence reports brought to him by unnamed sources that include ‘significant information’ about President-Elect Trump and his transition team.


1.) …”On numerous occasions the [Obama] intelligence community incidentally collected information about U.S. citizens involved in the Trump transition.”

2.)  “Details about U.S. persons associated with the incoming administration; details with little or no apparent foreign intelligence value were widely disseminated in intelligence community reporting.”

3.) “Third, I have confirmed that additional names of Trump transition members were unmasked.”

4.) “Fourth and finally, I want to be clear; none of this surveillance was related to Russia, or the investigation of Russian activities.

“The House Intelligence Committee will thoroughly investigate surveillance and its subsequent dissemination, to determine a few things here that I want to read off:”

•“Who was aware of it?”

•“Why it was not disclosed to congress?”

•“Who requested and authorized the additional unmasking?”

•“Whether anyone directed the intelligence community to focus on Trump associates?”

•“And whether any laws, regulations or procedures were violated?”

“I have asked the Directors of the FBI, NSA and CIA to expeditiously comply with my March 15th (2017) letter -that you all received a couple of weeks ago- and to provide a full account of these surveillance activities.”

Again, this is why the intelligence reports seem likely to have been political opposition research -that was part of Obama’s PDB– unless it was a separate intelligence product, apart from the PDB, which was created for the Office of the President.  [I view the latter as highly doubtful because it would be too risky for the President to be asking for specific ‘stand alone’ intelligence against political adversaries, ie candidate Donald Trump.]

…Here’s where all the dots connect:

Fast forward to 2018 – Aside from the larger Russian conspiracy narrative, up to now the controversial media story has been around the origin of the 2016 FISA warrant(s).

As previously stated by all reporting there was a June 2016 FISA application that was denied, and an October 2016 application that was approved.  The current line of congressional inquiry surrounds the underlying content of the requested FISA warrant, and whether it was built upon fraud and manipulated content (the ‘Steele Dossier’) presented to the FISA Court (FISC).

Recently the media have been working frantically, against an entire year of prior support for the Steele Dossier, to distance the origin of the FBI counterintelligence operation from the dossier.   The reason why reveals the bigger underlying story.

When Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes explained his concern in March 2017 about what he saw from a review of 2016 intelligence gathering, reporting and subsequent unmasking, the issue behind his concern was clouded in mystery. Indeed the larger headlines at the time were about demanding a special prosecutor and driving the Russia conspiracy narrative.

In hindsight, and with information from our assembled timelines of 2016 though today, we can now revisit that concern expressed by Chairman Nunes with a great deal more perspective and information. Understanding the latest information will help us all understand the totality of Nunes original frame of reference.

As many of you are aware, immediately following the 2016 presidential election NSA Director Admiral Mike Rogers traveled to Trump Tower to meet with president-elect Donald Trump. The day AFTER the Rogers visit, President-elect Trump moved his transition team out of Trump Tower to Bedminister New Jersey.

We always suspected NSA Director Rogers gave President-elect Trump a head’s up of sorts.

Later, during the December 2016 and Jan, Feb, March, April 2017 Russian Conspiracy frenzy, when the entire intelligence community seemed to be collectively leaking against Trump’s interests, those suspicions gained even greater likelihood. However, what we learned in 2017 about the activity in 2016 almost guarantees that was exactly what happened. That back-story also ties into both the FISA issue and the Devin Nunes concern.

Admiral Mike Rogers became NSA director in April 2014.

Sometime in early 2016 Admiral Rogers became aware of “ongoing” and “intentional” violations of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), Section 702 surveillance. Specifically item #17 which includes the unauthorized upstream data collection of U.S. individuals within NSA surveillance.

Section 702 – Item #17 “About Queries” is specifically the collection of emails, and phone call surveillance of U.S. persons.

The public doesn’t discover this issue, and NSA Director Rogers action, until May 2017 when we learn that Rogers told the FISA court he became aware of unlawful surveillance and collection of U.S. persons. Put into context, with the full back-story, it appears that 2016 surveillance was the political surveillance now in the headlines; the stuff Chairman Nunes is currently questioning.

The dates here are important as they tell a story.

As a result of Rogers suspecting [FISA 702 (#17 – email and phone calls)] surveillance activity was being used for reasons he deemed unlawful, in mid 2016 Rogers ordered the NSA compliance officer to run a full audit on 702 NSA compliance.

Again, 702 is basically spying on Americans; the actual “spying” part is 702. Item 17 is “About Queries“, which allows queries or searches of content of email and phone conversations based on any subject matter put into the search field.

The NSA compliance officer identified several strange 702 “About Queries” that were being conducted. These were violations of the fourth amendment (search and seizure), ie. unlawful surveillance and gathering. Admiral Rogers was briefed by the compliance officer on October 20th, 2016.

Admiral Mike Rogers ordered the “About Query” activity to stop, reported the activity to the DOJ, and then went to the FISA court.

On October 26th, 2016, full FISC assembly, NSA Director Rogers personally informed the court of the 702(17) violations. Additionally, Rogers also stopped “About Query” permanently.

[Things to note: ♦Note the sequencing; ♦note that Rogers a career military person, followed the chain of command; ♦note the dates as they align with the Trump FISA application from the FBI and DOJ-NSD, (ie. early October 2016); ♦and note amid this sequence/time-line the head of DOJ-National Security Divsion, John P Carlin resigns.]

IMPORTANT – WATCH The first two and a half minutes of this video:


The DOJ National Security Division set Admiral Mike Rogers up to take the fall for their unlawful conduct. They preempted Rogers by filing a notification with the FISA Court on 26th September 2016 (look at the pdf). DOJ-NSD head John P Carlin was setting up Rogers as the scapegoat while knowing the NSA FISA compliance officer was still reviewing their conduct. Carlin wouldn’t notify the court unless he was trying to cover something. Carlin then announced his resignation. The NSA compliance officer did not brief Admiral Rogers until 20th Oct 2016. Admiral Rogers notified the FISC on 26th Oct 2016.

October 2016 is a very important month:

♦DOJ Deputy Attorney Bruce Ohr was “demoted” in the summer of 2017 after the Inspector General discovered unreported 2016 contacts between Ohr and Russian Dossier author Christopher Steele, as well as contact with Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson, in October 2016.

♦Also in October 2016 the DOJ lawyers formatted the FBI information (Steele Dossier etc.) for the Trump FISA application; the head of the NSD, Asst. Attorney General John P Carlin, left his job. It would have specifically been John Carlin’s responsibility to ensure a valid legal basis for the FISA application submitted to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC).

In October 2016 the NSA compliance officer completes a review and briefs Rogers of FISA(17) violations, email collection and phone surveillance. Rogers informs FISC – [FISA Court Ruling Link]

Now Look At ThisOctober 2016: On Friday November 18th, 2016, The Washington Post reported on a recommendation in “October” that Mike Rogers be removed from his NSA position:

The heads of the Pentagon and the nation’s intelligence community have recommended to President Obama that the director of the National Security Agency, Adm. Michael S. Rogers, be removed.

The recommendation, delivered to the White House last month, was made by Defense Secretary Ashton B. Carter and Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper Jr., according to several U.S. officials familiar with the matter.

[…] In a move apparently unprecedented for a military officer, Rogers, without notifying superiors, traveled to New York to meet with Trump on Thursday at Trump Tower. That caused consternation at senior levels of the administration, according to the officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal personnel matters. (link)


Important reminder. Remember, in 2015 Sally Yates blocked any inspector general oversight of the DOJ National Security Division (SEE Pdf HERE). The OIG, Michael Horowitz, requested oversight and it was Sally Yates who responded with a lengthy 58-page legal explanation saying, essentially, ‘nope – not allowed.’ (PDF HERE) All of the DOJ is subject to oversight, except the NSD.

There’s a pretty clear picture here.

Obama’s political operatives within the DOJ-NSD were using FISA 702(17) surveillance “about inquiries” that would deliver email and phone communication for U.S. people (Trump campaign). The NSD unit was working in coordination with the FBI Counterintelligence Unit (Peter Strzok etc.).  In an effort to stop the activity NSA Director Mike Rogers initiated a full 702 compliance review.  However, before the review was complete the DOJ-NSD had enough information for their unlawful FISA warrant which worked retroactively to make the prior FBI surveillance (began in July ’16 per James Comey) lawful. Rogers stopped the process on October 26th 2016. As a result of his not going along, Rogers became a risk; Clapper demanded he be fired.

Ten days after the election, November 17th 2016, Admiral Rogers travels to Trump Tower without telling ODNI James Clapper. Rogers likely informs President-elect Trump of the prior activity by the FBI and DOJ, including the probability that all of Trump Tower’s email and phone communication was being collected.

On November 17th, 2016, NSA Director Admiral Mike Rogers went to see President-Elect Donald Trump in Trump Tower, New York.  –SEE HERE–  Director Rogers never told his boss DNI, James Clapper.

On November 18th, 2016, the Trump Transition Team announced they were moving all transition activity to Trump National Golf Club in Bedminster, New Jersey. –SEE HERE– Where they interviewed and discussed the most sensitive positions to fill.  Defense, State, CIA, ODNI.

The transition team was set up in Trump Tower. The very next day, November 18th 2016, Trump moves the entire transition team to Bedminister New Jersey?

Does this make more sense now?

It would appear Obama’s Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, is up to his eyeballs in this; though he denies participating. The FBI counterintelligence unit was monitoring Trump through FISA 702(17) upstream surveillance collected by a DOJ National Security Division that had no oversight.

The information the FBI collected, and the stuff Fusion GPS was creating via Christopher Steele, was used to create the Russian Narrative and also to manipulate the FISC into giving them a FISA warrant. ie. “The Insurance Policy”.

Ultimately, the people within all of these intercepts is what Devin Nunes discovered when he looked at the “unmasking requests” which were a result of those FISA 702(17) collections on Team Trump. That’s why Devin Nunes was so stunned at what he saw in February and March 2017.

This is why Chairman Devin Nunes is currently gathering evidence.


This entry was posted in 1st Amendment, 4th Amendment, Abusive Cops, AG Jeff Sessions, Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Clinton(s), Conspiracy ?, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Desperately Seeking Hillary, DHS, Donald Trump, Donald Trump Transition, Election 2018, FBI, media bias, Military, Notorious Liars, NSA, President Trump, Russia, Secretary of State, Spying, Susan Rice, THE BIG UGLY, Uncategorized, USA, White House Coverup. Bookmark the permalink.

1,060 Responses to Operation Condor – How NSA Director Mike Rogers Saved The U.S. From a Massive Constitutional Crisis…

  1. Badbob says:

    This is points out corruption beyond the ability of people to believe

    Liked by 5 people

    • Person wishing to seek a definition for the term Mind boggling – Read this article.

      Liked by 4 people

    • brh82 says:

      If you read Twitter, especially the President’s Tweets, the Commenters are mostly Progressives and it is simply stunning how uninformed they are about current events. They are still stuck back at Javits Hall, crying, at midnight November 8, 2016, counting on fate to change and make Hillary president any day now. They have NO idea her next home might indeed be Gitmo.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Rhonda Philips says:

      I’ve been re-reading, so appalled at the depth of corruption. We should remember that Clapper lied to Congress and Congress did not hold him in contempt or hold him accountable in any fashion. Am I correct thinking that both Clapper and Brennan have breached security oaths by speaking on issues that they were involved with, had knowledge of, etc.? They are barred from discussion for five years after leaving post.
      I sure hope these kooks have their security passes revoked.

      Liked by 3 people

    • tikeman says:

      It also gives great clarity to Chuck Schumer’s statement about the intelligence dept being
      able to roll Trump anyway they choose.
      Time to investigate Schumer and his contacts to see what he/they knew and when he knew it.

      Liked by 3 people

  2. georgiafl says:

    President Trump has put the enemy in an uncomfortable position:

    Liked by 9 people

  3. WFO says:

    Thank you Sundance for your great work and helping me/us understand this major event – and to Admiral Mike Rogers for having the strength and loyalty to survive in those shark infested waters.

    Liked by 9 people

  4. Kevin n Tonya Hiner says:

    And why aren’t these people all in JAIL awaiting trial already?? Why are people being allowed to disregard court orders to go to court to be investigated?? If it was just regular citizens they’d already be in cuffs a year ago. The biased ways justice works for people in the Government VS regular citizens is corrupt and Criminal. That’s not what our founding fathers set up nor is it how Justice is supposed to work. It’s supposed to be blind to positions, fame or how rich one is. Justice is supposed to be even and just. This country and it’s true Patriots need to drain our branches of Government and start over vetting those we put there and simple fast ways to fire them when needed. But above all set TERM limits all across the board so they can’t monopolize the position and some become corrupt and self serving instead of doing the job they are supposed to do. SERVE AMERICA AND IT’S PEOPLE.

    Liked by 5 people

    • cuchulaine says:

      Judge Napolitano: Obama Didn’t Need FISA To Spy On Trump


    • Matthew J. Smith says:

      We knew what was going on as soon as Comey declined to prosecute Hillary, claiming there was no “intent”, when a,) that’s not for him to determine, & b.) intent isn’t a neccesary component for conviction of lawbreaking in this case.

      Liked by 1 person

      • GenEarly says:

        That a criminal old hag like Hilarity Clintoon and her Bubba can waltz thru Government all these years with no serious jail time speaks to the almost absolute corruption of the USSA. The Bushies cloaked their CIA-NWO crimes much better, but both are above The Law.

        Liked by 1 person

        • I’m into the truth, not left right, it’s a globalist vs nationalist world. The globalists are the enemy, plenty of folks in both parties. The crimes they commit are all but countless. And don’t forget, this is a war against Americans by domestic tyrants. Nothing short of that, but also criminal.


      • bleachbit and hammers are intent

        Liked by 1 person

      • Michael says:

        and he knew her “intentions” before she was actually interviewed. Note that having an illegal server to conduct government business, in a flagrant attempt to escape oversight, should CERTAINLY qualify as “General Intent”, even if “Specific Intent” cannot be proven (example: a drunk driver kills someone. HOMICIDE requires INTENT. They didn’t SPECIFICALLY INTEND to kill anyone…but driving drunk qualifies as GENERAL INTENT, and the driver is convicted of vehicular homicide). Finally, under law, if ANOTHER law SPECIFICALLY lays out greater penalties for an otherwise similar offense WITH other factors (such as INTENT), then the understanding is that the lesser crime DOES NOT REQUIRE those additional factors (direct example: Mishandling classified documents with NO intent to harm national security is a felony ..but the next step up (intentionally mishandling classified material in an effort to harm national security) is TREASON).


  5. sedeuceter says:

    Does this not implicate the prior President of the United States and ex-Marxist Moslem in Chief as having knowledge of the illegal surveillance activities?

    “Again, this is why the intelligence reports seem likely to have been political opposition research -that was part of Obama’s PDB– unless it was a separate intelligence product, apart from the PDB, which was created for the Office of the President.”

    Liked by 3 people

  6. recoverydotgod says:

    Admiral Rodgers is certainly deserving of a gratitude for his strength of character and action.

    I did not realize that Admiral Rodgers attended the Halifax forum after meeting with Trump at the Trump Tower. That is the forum Sen. McCain and Sir Andrew Wood and David Kramer spoke about the dossier which set in motion David Kramer’s trip to Surrey to be briefed by Christopher Steele and McCain ultimately receiving a copy of the dossier.



  7. David A Akers says:

    According to the article, “on October 26th, 2016, full FISC assembly, NSA Director Rogers personally informed the court of the 702(17) violations. Additionally, Rogers also stopped ‘About Query’ permanently.” Are these liberals who are appointed to the FISA Court? The Court could have and should have held the FBI/DOJ in contempt for the false warrant to spy on Americans and on the Trump campaign.

    Liked by 1 person

  8. David A Akers says:

    I read the full article. We can see who are the bad guys in this story. It is Obama, his weaponized Deep State, the MSM, and the Democrats who are bad.


  9. Secret dossier of evidence compiled by MI5 operative Christopher Steele into the assassination of Alexander Litvinenko implicates that Vladimir Putin signed off on the hit..
    Secret dossier against Putin .. Secret dossier against Trump and McCain shouting from the rooftops that Putin is a murderer a thug bla bla bla . I am not even sure Alexander is even dead . The lame story just like the FBI evidence that Russia hacked the DNC with that drawing and fancy bear. same with the teapot stupid evidence used in the British courts. Trying to get Theresa May to denounce Putin for the murderous thug he is and she said no she didn’t want to start trouble between the to nations, sound familiar .. Livineniko’s story is ridiculous from the death bed accusations that Putin did it his bat crazy liberal wife. Oh and Steele and Livineniko worked together at Orbits international. Steele needs to get out of the Dossier biz


  10. ginaswo says:

    Thank you Admiral Rogers. God Bless youl

    Liked by 2 people

  11. Patriot1 says:

    Now I understand why the left wanted Obummer to be President. This corruption is beyond the pale.
    Great job Sundance. This article took a lot of work.

    Liked by 2 people

  12. Ruth MITCHELL says:

    Thank you for the all your research.


  13. Risin'Tide says:

    I seem to remember a few people claiming to have information, posting on YouTube at the time, that a coup attempt against the Constitution had been thwarted by counter-coup measures. Looking back, I believe Rogers and some others saved the country and this was what the individuals were referring to. Wish I had the links to some of those but I watched them from someone else’s tablet at the time. We have truly been living and dangerous times in this country. My prayer is we will see all the linked conspiracy brought to light but it will be over a long period of time so that the public can digest the magnitude.


  14. brh82 says:

    I need to ask again, I guess, why Sally Yates had the gravitas to limit oversight? She wrote a 58 page missive on it, but so what? Does everyone on her rung of the ladder have the right to say who does and who does not qualify for oversight?


    • iwasthere says:

      Because she was basically the AG. You need to look at some of the other stories on Obama’s attempts to stop the IGs. Sundance has some great ones.


      • brh82 says:

        Thanks Iwasthere, I will do a search for the IG stories. Curiosity about Yates has really been bugging me. Rarely have i seen on TV any Civil Servant as smug and self-righteous as she.


        • Johnnydub says:

          TS has some pages on the blocking on oversight. The chap who complained and ultimately had it reversed was Mr Horowitz, coincidentally the same chap who is now undertaking the IG review commissioned by President Trump in Jan 2017.


          • Rhonda Philips says:

            Don’t put too much trust in Horowitz read the essay regarding him posted at this site. I think it was written by Sundance. Sundance and Rappaport my favorite investigative journalists.


      • Yes like when Obama and Holder tried to make the IG ask before he interviewed anyone about Fast & Furious scandal! Obama and his cronies thought they could just make up laws as they went.


      • Joe May says:

        Remember that Obama never appointed an IG over the State Dept. while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State. Obama gave her unaccountable freedom to do what she wanted. Remember too that Cheryl Mills was allowed to work as top aide to sec of state Clinton and also to work in some capcity at the Clinton Foundation. These two situations created the boldest empowerment of self enrichment ever seen.


        • justmom says:

          I’m going to go way out on a limb here and guess that Hillary had the goods on Obama and was blackmailing him with exposure. Remember the FBI file scandal during the Clinton administration, rumored to be caused by Hillary herself snooping through files, then again during the 2008 election primaries, when Obama’s passport files were illegally accessed and Hillary was the main suspect, all of a sudden Clinton’s and McCain’s files were somehow discovered to have also been illegally accessed as well? Deflecting the suspicion away from Hillary? Subsequently, a couple of low level state dept employees were fired, but then somehow, miraculously, Hillary was named Secretary of State after Obama won in 2008, even though she wasn’t named on a single list of prospective cabinet nominees from any of Obama’s advisors as evidenced by the wikileaks releases. She got the appointment the old fashioned way: blackmail. She blackmailed him every step of the way and she will set him up to take the fall for her as well. When Bill took it upon himself to try to intimidate Lynch, we know that Obama was trying to step back since that should have been his job. Why didn’t the Clintons trust Obama to keep Lynch on program, risking exposure as they did with that meeting? Of course, you cannot trust people that you have to blackmail to keep them on your side!

          IMHO, the Obamas started to see the whole picture during her tenure at State but never imagined the extent of her duplicity, corruption and greed until the 2016 primaries. When Biden decided not to face Hillary in the 2016 primaries, we know that obviously fear of Hillary was the predominant factor. After she had lost, he admitted as much.

          Liked by 1 person

  15. lisa says:

    corruption at its best…how can they sleep at night…simple no conscicoous

    Liked by 1 person

  16. iwasthere says:

    Indeed, the ‘insurance policy’ was the FISA warrant. Glad the timeline matches up with my instincts. iwasthere – albeit – many moons ago.


  17. Sasha says:

    There is not another like you Sundance, your research and analysis is brilliant.
    Can’t thank you enough to for the pieces together, your a true treasure.
    Admiral Mike Rogers is a hero, so is Nunes in a world of filled with demons.
    Thank God Trump won!


  18. jello333 says:

    If Rogers and Nunes wind up being as important to all this as they now appear to be, one day they’ll have monuments built in their honor.


  19. Angelique says:

    Not mentioned in this article is the Obama Executive Order 12333, signed on 12 Jan 17…this basically allows anyone in the IC or WH to have access to the NSA raw intelligence…these transcripts will have the US Person by name. No longer is need to know enforced… Why was this signed? And especially by that WH?
    The chances of this unmasked intelligence being germane to most IC and WH personnel is miniscule. Another example of the CYA and “we’re above those rules” mentality of that administration.


  20. theprecinctproject says:



    What are you going to do about it?

    Where to start:

    Go to Amazon.com and search on:

    book Trump Schultz real ball game politics live make america great again

    Then do something.

    And watch this:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYFA85s7x2E&t=15s (just watch the first 23 minutes; questions are answered thereafter)

    Thank you.


  21. WOW! Just WOW! What a detailed expose of all the events! It is now painfully clear that Ameri and have been subjected to illegal activities under Barack H Obama! There are many many many inducements that now need to be completed. They not only include the top dog they include far more than ever anticipated. We are looking at least minimum 30-45 Federal indictments! This is the very “Tryanny” we were warned againstby our founding fathers! This leaves that bile build up that makes you feel continuously ill!
    Great job! Long but totally worth it!


  22. Mary Ann says:

    Now all has been heard;here is the conclusion of the matter:
    Fear God and keep his commandments,for this is the duty of all mankind.
    For God will bring every deed into judgment,including every hidden thing,whether it is good or evil.There shall be no reward to the evil man; the candle of the wicked shall be put out.
    For nothing is secret that will not be revealed, nor anything hidden that will not be known and come to light… I guess they didn’t read the rule book 🙂
    Thank you for sharing!

    Liked by 1 person

  23. MLS says:

    Goooooooooooo Gitmooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


  24. Mark Matis says:

    When there is no Rule of Law, it works BOTH ways. This country’s “Law Enforcement” and their families had better understand that, and soon.

    THEY are the enablers for this treason and sedition.


  25. ‘it is doubtful the 911 commission ever gave thought to what might happen when intelligence is weaponized as a political tool.’ Isn’t this what debates about Patriot act have been about? Obama opposed before he became Pres, then learned to love it. Then he f**ked it, heh


  26. zucccchini says:

    OH, yeah….how about that fire Hillary just happened to have recently. I give it about two to five months for what was burnt up was, OH, MY GOSH!….just lost in that fire…we are soooo sorry… Simply nothing left….I lost my Yoga books and tapes, Chelseas wedding pictures…OH, MY GOSH!!


  27. lieudiere says:

    Thank you so much for this excellent article.


  28. MJ Watters says:

    What a fascinating, comprehensive piece. You have a true gift for making a highly complex set of events understandable. Thank you!


  29. JB says:

    ADM Rogers is a good man. Always liked him when he was CDRFLTCYBER. I had hoped he would end the corruption that his predecessors had allowed to proliferate. This is great news!

    There’s more out there I hope will eventually come to light on what used to happen, especially before ADM R took command.

    Liked by 1 person

  30. Jarvis says:

    It would appear that Rod Rosenweasel’s hands are not entirely clean, either.


  31. StormyeyesC says:

    He resigned because it will require a lot of time to be a star witness. Then he will need to find a very private place to hide and enjoy his retirement safely


  32. Former Navy Admiral Mike Rogers (& wife) should see himself as candidate for special treatment for having made high profile criminal eye witnesses testimony, then being hidden in America with a new address. He will need someone to do his errands for him (& wife) into a local town from high up in the mountains. Yes an American hero, who respects defending the Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic.


  33. Richard says:

    Time to #DrainTheSwamp


    • jello333 says:

      It’s already begun…. but so far it’s just a trickle, hardly enough for most of the creatures to even notice. But a few of the more intelligent ones are starting to go, “Uh… do you hear something? There’s something going on that doesn’t feel right.”


  34. franktrades says:

    It is imperative that this be written in a more palatable and digestible way for public consumption.

    Liked by 1 person

  35. Mel Frost says:

    DINOMITE…..can’t spell but can sure read!
    The “smell” was self-evident for the past 8 years, and finally, the lid is blown off for all Americans to see the mass of maggots infesting our people’s government…. Get Mo is to good for these traitors! As is any federal lockup! I vote for a lot of new rope to be attached to lamp posts in DC for immediate use….film at 11 o’clock (or, lose your FCC lic!)… Check-6


  36. We now know the reason that HRC blurted out her apology to BHO when she lost the election.


  37. Diann Johnson says:

    Where is Mike Rodgers now? Is he still in office under Trump?


    • On 5 January, National Security Agency Director, Admiral Mike Rogers has announced plans to retire this spring and has said he expected a successor to be nominated and approved by the U.S. Senate this month, according to a report on Friday.
      Rogers, who heads the U.S. Cyber Command, made the announcement to agency staff, a Washington Post reporter said in a post on Twitter. NSA did not immediately respond to a request for comment.


  38. Sue says:

    Thank you Rogers & Nines for your hard work unearthing the “weasels” in the WH. Many Americans await justice.


  39. Robert Glenn and says:

    This is the biggest scandal in memory…Out of control spying on the opposition, widespread dissemination to unauthorized individuals while arguing that the information was too “sensitive” to give to authorized representatives og Congress…Definition of deep state

    Liked by 1 person

    • jello333 says:

      Yes, this is so far beyond Watergate it’s not even in the same league. Most of what made Watergate so big was that Nixon and some of his inner circle were stupid enough to try to cover it all up, and lie about everything. But the initial break-in was, as far as I know, NOT a super high-level plot, and certainly not reaching the Oval Office or whole gov’t agencies. But THIS — from Obama, to the DNC, to the FBI, to the DOJ, to MSM, and on and on and on — this is FAR bigger and more dangerous than Watergate.

      Liked by 1 person

      • MowRon says:

        Yes, Jello, because the means to do the collection are so much more sophisticated than breaking in and stealing paper copies.


  40. CAROL DUDA says:

    thank you for laying out this information in an easy to understand timeline. I watched theses briefings and was a little confused by verbal timeline.


  41. James kravitz says:

    Thank God for honorable men like Rogers. Perhaps there is hope for us. It needs to be brought to the light of day so it doesn’t happen again.


  42. mutualfuns says:

    Easy to see why Clapper fights so hard disparaging Trump on CNN…these people are fighting for their lives and CNN is circling the drain.

    Liked by 1 person

  43. just thank you Sundance:
    nowhere has anyone even attempted to document this sinister conspiracy against the people as you have.
    It is clearly the most comprehensive report available
    Better than Bernstein and Woodward
    We so prayed that you existed. The people knew but were frustrated beyond definition
    because no willing reporter had the skill set or desire to inform the people
    we are so indebted to you.

    Liked by 1 person

  44. Thank you Sundance, Congressman Nunes, and Admiral Rogers

    Proves also that TRUMP is brilliant and knew:

    Liked by 1 person

  45. conrad neumann says:

    God bless America !!!


  46. Redoak81 says:

    This is very thorough research Dan. I Googled and Wikipedia’d many of the side stories, it all lines up. I also remember how the mainstream media attacked and mocked President Trump when he first tweeted about the wiretapping. The media was all over him, said he was crazy.


  47. Sharpshorts says:

    Re: The Admiral Mike Rogers heads up given to PDT and the Transition team.
    Sundance has wonderfully mapped out for us Admiral Rogers’ meeting with President Trump (and/or the transition team) which seems to have led to the decision to move the transition team to Bedminster, NJ.
    This meeting happened after Admiral Mike Rogers was briefed by the NSA compliance officer and after Admiral Mike Rogers ordered all “About Query” activity to stop.

    Here’s some of my off the wall stuff…humor me…:
    Question 1) How confident could Admiral Mike Rogers have been that the meeting in Trump Tower was not still being “bugged”?
    If Admiral Rogers had low confidence regarding the answer for question 1, how probable is it that “the small group” of black hats would have had access to what transpired at the meeting between Admiral Rogers and the transition team which they then could have used to plan their next moves and/or cover up a lot of their tracks…Is it possible that the audio and/or visual of the meeting is still stored somewhere, like at that giant NSA facility that was recently built, in Nevada I think(?)…which leads to question 2:
    Question 2) Is there any info that Trump Tower was “swept“ for surveillance equipment, either before or after the meeting? Or would any “wire tapping” have been be done solely over the existing internet and phone line infrastructure already built into the building?
    It was reported that extensive renovations were performed to the White House (post election) but we don’t know if any “extraordinary” surveillance equipment was found at that time, IE left over from the previous administration. Also makes me wonder about how secure Camp David is from surveillance.
    Question 3) Does the NSA have the technical capabilities to gather, store and collate signals from “smart phones” and/or other smart appliances without the owner’s knowledge (even if they are turned off)? If that capability exists, who else would have it or access to it?
    If the answer to questions 3 is yes, the recent news of “banning” smart phones from the West Wing of the White House might be explained.
    I don’t know if FISA requests and whether FISA Judges approval/disapprovals are ever made public, Perhaps they could become public if a criminal trial came about (?). In the two 2016 cases It would certainly be interesting if they were made public.


  48. J. Kirby Weldon says:

    God help us! The Democrats almost got away with this. Stating the obvious; If Hillary had been elected, none of this would have seen the light of day.

    It’s been said that this ‘light’ (the truth) is the best disinfectant.

    We were, and still are, too close to the edge of the dissolution of our constitutional republic to stop discovering the truth.

    Keep it up for all of us!!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s