President Trump speaks with the press on Thursday afternoon following another stupid day in the NYC hush money trial.
This is the only court case in history where both the prosecution and the judge cannot outline the details of a law that was claimed to be broken by the District Attorney in New York City. President Trump is a criminal defendant, presumably supposed to defend himself against accusations that are not outlined by any unlawful code violation or illegal activity.
.
”This is the only court case in history where both the prosecution and the judge cannot outline the details of a law that was claimed to be broken by the District Attorney in New York City. ”
I cannot comprehend how this is possible!
It’s possible in a Democrat Party controlled state.
More than that, it is possible in Democrat Party controlled America. The Democrats have said explicitly that if and when they control the Congress with enough majorities, and also the Executive Branch, they will quickly pack the Supreme Court to give themselves a majority on the court. At which point the last line of defense against their tyranny will be gone.
This is exactly why jury nullification is essential for a free people. The legislature can pass, the executive can enforce, and the judicial run a trial using unjust laws. But, a jury made of free people, who have granted consent to government, has the power to declare a person innocent because the law is unjust.
It’s the almost the last line of defense against a corrupt government.
If enough people do not comply then that’s the best line of defense.
Part of peaceful noncompliance is jury nullification.
Check out the Fully Informed Jury Association.
There will always be the one defense our founders codified in the Bill of Rights. But if we get that far…
The people are the Last Line of Defense.
In a Divided Country where one side is ruled by the other and they feel it will never change and was done unfairly, I would guess the People will take it in their own hands to change it. The only question is if there is enough people willing to fight? or will they accept it? I worry Americans have gotten so soft they will just accept being ruled by people who hate them. And Yes they do Hate us.
It shouldn’t be! The law is the law! Democrats are not above the law! Where are the higher courts stopping this! It’s unconstitutional and should not be happening!
(yawn)……another gubmint troll….
The law requires a ruling before there can be a higher court review. Where is the law allowing higher courts to stop this.
Voters can recall or not re-elect many judges and DA’s.. Just do it.
Shouldn’t be doesn’t address what is. The system needs to be burned down. Burn it all down, including the debased and increasingly worthless fiat currency that is backed by… the criminal government! That gives me the warm fuzzies!
If the Constitution isn’t enforced, it’s really just a piece of paper with some neat stuff written on it.
Also possible in a Communist’s Party, in a Socialist Party and in a Monarchy style controlled state.
Don’t think we are a Republic state anymore.
It’s possible in a Democrat Party controlled state.
That, and in a banana republic……but I repeat myself….
“It’s possible in a
DemocratCommunist Party controlled state…”Didn’t Forrest Gump say: “Stupid is as stupid does”. A great quote that, IMESHO, applies to the Uniparty, the Deep State, the Swamp, and to a large number of gubermint employees.
“I cannot comprehend how this is possible!”
There is a lot of precedent for this. Just not so much in the US.
https://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/modern-world-history-1918-to-1980/russia-1900-to-1939/the-show-trials-in-the-ussr/
Isaiah 59:14 says, “Justice is turned away, and righteousness stands at a distance. For truth has stumbled in the public square, and honesty cannot enter.”
Use the AOC test when she defended the Biden crime family. Did you actually see him commit a crime? RICO is not a crime, it is a classification of crime. Did you actually see Trump commit a crime? Thus spake AOC, New York seems to like her thinking.
Unless the whole rule of law has been scuttled, which has either already happened or is on the horizon. Lawlessness is the new “norm”!
Maybe Spielberg is already on contract and this is the first act. Most any American that is smart enough to vote knows what this show is really about!
Anyone (Dem’s are the ultimate sheep) who’s gonna vote for Biden won’t be influenced by all the Lawfare against Trump. Why the hell are they wasting everyone’s time and money on this crap?
It doesn’t matter if Biden only gets 150 legitimate votes. By AM 6 November he will have several million more than Trump…
Remember that the process IS the punishment. Drain resources, limit access to campaigning. They’re executing their plan. Conviction is a cherry on top. Multiply x other lawfare trials.
They are doing, what they are accusing Trump of doing!
They always do.
Why?
To give them a legal leg to stand on to keep him off the ballot, and to weary him and his supporters.
Where there is Dharma, there is Victory!
Always MAGA 👊👊🙏🏻🙏🏻❤️🇺🇸❤️🇺🇸
This is known as the stage moment when the murderer is revealed. The Climax. The audience suspected it was the butler and not terribly surprised, but in the denouement comes the amazingballs twist.
More democrat FRAUD: One thing Americans have to force into effect is criminal accountability of judges. The U.S. Constitution NEVER gave judges complete immunity. THEY GAVE IT TO THEMSELVES !
Many other countries put judges in prison for their lawless conduct and the USA should immediately start doing the same thing. A LOT of judges should be thrown into prison. Look at current events in America right now !
How can a nation have any justice if the judges are lawless?
We have ruthless criminals masquerading as judges in state and federal courts throughout the United States.
“More democrat FRAUD.”
It certasinly is.
But ask yourself how many Republicans in DC have spoken in support of President Trump.
They’re all frightened little bunny rabbits.
Not all.
Most of them are complicit pawns of the Globalists.
They can’t. But then think about it. If they can put judges in prison, how quickly would a huge swath of conservative judges would be swept away by the same corrupt system?
Fact is, the absence of any moral code within the purveyors of the process means they will do anything, with no limits, to prostitute the law that is supposed to protect us.
The kangaroo courts are just a symptom.
God help us all.
Show me the man I’ll show you the crime. We are now in a Soviet justice system.
It’s much worse than that now. Back then the entire population besides those tasked with upholding tyranny were afraid.
We have what, at least 40% of the pop that is more than pleased what’s going on in America at the moment. That’s what’s actually unsettling.
We are being conquered. Plain and simple the far left neo marxists islamo marxists socialists and communists have infiltrated so many of our institutions it’s incredible. The use of charities grants 401C and NGOs is the spider web of dirty money leading right to those who are destroying the culture and the youth. Who will take the stand in our corrupt govt and turn down Soros money or zuckerbucks. It’s a massive organized attempt to take America. A few years ago this was radical to say and you must be a troll but by now it’s getting mainstraem to believe it. Everyone has to be more forcefull with our feckless politicians time is getting short comrades.
“This is the only court case in history where both the prosecution and the judge cannot outline the details of a law that was claimed to be broken by the District Attorney in New York City.”
It had to get here sooner or later. With the January 6th case of Jack Smith, not one statute fits what Smith accused Trump of doing. Over on Twitter (now X), I warned liberal Trump haters that there were no criminal elements in the Electoral Count Act, the governing statute of the Electoral Vote Count by Congress. They assured me Smith would find statutes that fit. No, he didn’t. It is not far from having all wrong statutes to having NONE. Bragg is just the first one to go there. The judge should have ended it if all Bragg had were theories. Just another step on the evolutionary trail of LAWFARE.
Just as there is no criminal element/enforcement mechanism in the Presidential Records Act.
I’ll have to post again examples of how federal criminal statutes have to be read in order to determine whether or not someone’s behavior violated any of the elements (conditional statements) in the statute. You can actually flowchart the logic like a computer program.
Have any of these geniuses figured out the fallout from all of this lawfare and the bad legal precedents that they are setting by the minute? You will see NY v Trump, GA v Trunp, United States V Trump argued for the next 100 years as legal defenses when this is all over.
They care nothing for bad legal precedents, because after the 2024 theft/coup we will no longer have a Constitution.
He is guilty of the crime of being Donald Trump.
There is precedent in Nazi Germany, where people were jailed for being Jews, members of the Confessing Church, and others that the Nazis did not like.
Dictatorships don’t need actual laws on the books in order to punish those they don’t like.
Kafka-esque… (The Trial).