People might be interested in the recent stories of Canadian Premier Doug Ford and his reversal of position on Chinese EV production. Ontario Premier Ford now welcomes Chinese EVs into Canada.
Or people might be interested in the recent story of the EU announcing a historic trade deal with India. The European Union is now looking to find new markets to replace the U.S., while simultaneously agreeing to establish a new immigration/recruitment process to accept massive numbers of Indian migrants.
Yes, Canada reverses their position on trade with China, that’s odd. And somehow the EU immediately forgets their demands for India to stop buying Russian oil or face EU sanctions, another oddity. This is like watching someone you don’t like, get engaged to your smelly, fat ex-girlfriend. [Matthew 15:14]
Canada and the EU take trade and economic positions seemingly against U.S. interests. Simultaneously Mexico modifies all their trade positions to come into alignment with the USA. Yesterday, Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum announced Mexico will no longer ship oil to Cuba.
What’s going on?
Well, to really understand what is happening you need to look at President Trump’s responses to all of the individual issues outlined above and take a much bigger picture view. President Trump is the master of the ‘self-fulfilling prophecy.’
♦ CANADA – When President Trump was asked about Prime Minister Mark Carney creating a new trade agreement with China, President Trump responded that he didn’t care – it was irrelevant to him. Yet, simultaneously inside the USMCA President Trump has the power to veto any trade agreement between Mexico or Canada and a non-member nation.
So, why didn’t President Trump care? Easy, because in President Trump’s mind there’s not going to be a USMCA; so, he really doesn’t care if Canada runs to violate it. In real terms, Canada doing bilateral deals with other countries, especially deals potentially detrimental to the USA, only strengthens his position on dissolving the USMCA.
If Canada violates the terms and spirit of the USMCA, it makes dispatch of the unliked trade agreement even easier. Canada is helping President Trump remove the congressional justification they could use to block him. If Canada is violating the USMCA (CUSMA), Congress is kneecapped from interference.
Provoking Canada into a trade position, that puts them at a disadvantage trying to stop the dissolution of the CUSMA, stops Congress from opposing the fracture, and then opens the door to a bilateral trade agreement, is creating a self-fulfilling prophecy that is entirely controlled by President Donald Trump.
[I pointed this out on the ‘Russian Sanctions’ map four years ago for a reason.]
♦ EUROPE – In the last few months, the EU has been pressuring President Trump to join them in putting sanctions against India for purchasing Russian oil. Suddenly, all those Russian energy issues are dropped, and the EU signs a trade agreement with India. Again, just like with Canada, President Trump doesn’t care; he’s working on a much bigger objective.
Both Canada and Europe are independently, out of necessity, taking action that takes apart the trade and economic system they created. At the core of the old trade system both Canada and Europe were exploiting the USA, exfiltrating wealth and skimming the independent entrepreneurial innovation that originates from within the U.S. economic system.
That necessary exploitation happened because the USA is innovative (freedom-based capitalism), while the CA/EU system is built on government control mechanisms. The CA/EU energy policy is just one impactful example of their pontificating inability to be insightful when it comes to consequences. The EU and Canada are now stuck looking for markets that will do the dirty jobs, provide them with core components, while simultaneously looking for markets for their finished products.
On the other side of the approach is President Trump, working to expand U.S. industrial dirty job capacity, create our own core components, then create finished goods entirely on our own. A complete revitalization of the U.S. industrial and manufacturing base. Our U.S. GDP is currently expected to grow north of 5%. This is not happening by accident.
Additionally, EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen is not bragging about importing Indian IT workers in a vacuum. If the EU cannot skim off the IT capabilities of America, they have to find another Braintrust to tap. Just like the innovative dependencies of China, the EU is intellectually frigid; compliance is ingrained in their academia. Within the USA, we still have foundational disposition of ‘screw you‘ in our DNA.
Look at the advancements of Artificial Intelligence, or AI. All of the growth in that tech sector is being led by America. President Trump is taking every approach to ensure we remain the world’s dominant power in AI development. As much as Elon Musk’s quirks and quasi-friendly politics annoys me personally, strategically, on the technology side, it’s good to see him chumming around with President Trump; at least that’s what I tell myself.
♦ MEXICO – This is where it gets really, super interesting. You might remember that China was set to invest between $5 billion and $10 billion (total) in Mexico for EV auto manufacturing. In December of 2023, three Chinese auto manufacturers, MG, BYD, and Chery, announced they were going to spend billions building new EV manufacturing plants. Each Chinese manufacturer was initially going to spend between $1.5 to $2.0 billion. By March 2024, the reasoning was evident – Biden was supporting it.
When President Trump won the November 2024 election, all of those Chinese investments and plans inside Mexico were cancelled.
As we noted at the end of last year, splitting the USMCA into two bilateral trade deals, one for Mexico and one for Canada, will be one of the most interesting and long-term economically significant moves in U.S. trade history. It is going to be a lot of fun to watch these negotiations, and the pre-positioning gives us a preview of what is to come. Mexico is doing everything almost perfectly in preparation for their bilateral deal, including their stopping of oil shipments to Cuba.
This alignment follows the Mexican government passing a sweeping set of tariffs against Chinese imports. The Mexican government, led by Sheinbaum, made moves throughout 2025 to stay in alignment with a favorable U.S. trade agreement. Meanwhile, the Canadian government, led by Mark Carney, has been more antagonistic and positioning Canada to lose badly.
♦ SUMMARY: Some people have construed the bilateral trade preference of President Trump to be the elimination of globalism in favor of nationalism in trade agreements. While the outcome of Trump’s approach indeed aligns with that theme, it is not specifically the objective of President Trump to eliminate global trade, but rather to focus on specific interests in trade that benefit the unique nature of each party involved.
Canada can embrace China, and Europe can embrace India; in the bigger picture it really doesn’t matter. These relationships only create dependencies which are the natural outcome of globalism. From President Trump’s position, what really matters is what happens within our borders and how the United States economy is positioned. This is President Trump’s singular focus.
Do you remember President Trump leaving the 2025 G7 meeting in Canada early? The final day invitation list brought Australia, Mexico, Ukraine, South Korea, South Africa, India, the United Nations and the World Bank into the G7. President Donald Trump smartly exited the G7 assembly a day early, he departed before that crowd of interests arrived. The world leaders came because the process to keep USA wealth inside the USA is against their interests. That’s why they came, and that’s why President Trump left.
Globalism, in its economic construct, is a series of dependencies. However, the opposite is also true. If nations are not dependent, they are sovereign – able to exist without the need for support from other nations and systems. If nations are sovereign, then globalism is no longer needed. If each nation of the world is operating according to its individual best interests, the position of Donald Trump, then what happens to the governing elite who set up the system of interdependencies?
“G7”?
“Just like the innovative dependencies of China, the EU is intellectually frigid; compliance is engrained in their academia. Within the USA we still have foundational disposition of ‘screw you‘ in our DNA.”
To me this is an interesting point. I have a Dutch relative with a PhD and I’ve always been surprised at his sort of stuck in the mud thinking. For a long time I’ve thought the American gene pool was superior because of the courage of those who came here to start a new life with no guarantees (unlike the Somalians and others living on welfare). I think of the men, women and children who took off into a strange land in wagon trains facing the unknown. Our ancestors were tough people!
I hope this inheritance isn’t completely squandered – the “warmth of collectivism” is such hogwash.
This nation was built by the best and brightest the human species had to offer. Which is exactly why it is the single most successful social experiment in human history.
except we have the collectivism in some states…
Yes, you are correct, but why? Give us more than a phrase. Why are some states collectivist in your opinion?
I think election integrity is at the top of my list.
There may be 50%+ collectivist states, but I believe that stolen elections and indoctrination got us to that state.
…except we have 100% fraudulent mail in voting & machines that allow collectivism in some states…
FIFY
You’re welcome
Excellent analysis by Sundance, except for asserting the continuing existence of “the independent entrepreneurial innovation that originates from within the U.S. economic system.” Scarlett, our potential innovators are now being forced to become like your Dutch relative. Our government and universities have said “screw you” to our innovators. It is considered better for our currently concentrated owners to control innovators, than have them succeed on their own and disrupt the current ownership hierarchy.
Historical US commercial technology leadership was built by the patent system, individual creativity, and collaboration between universities and technology. But the US has recently adopted the communist Russia and Chinese type systems of universities taking the inventions of their professors and students. Accordingly, US technology leadership has been declining since the 1980’s, and is now lost. US universities which used to collaborate with growing “industry” before and after WWII decided that their future growth and power would come from politically increasing government funding, and that US “industry” was their prey, rather than their collaborators.
The Constitution grants Congress the power to “promote the progress of science and useful arts by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings [now including software] and discoveries.’ It does not grant Congress the power to act to enable and promote taking inventions and writings from the actual authors and inventors. Abraham Lincoln, himself a patentee, recognized that this Constitutional establishment of inventor rights encouraged innovation, by adding “the fuel of interest to the fire of genius”.
In 1982, Congress stole inventions made or first constructed with federal funding from the inventors, and effectively granted their inventions to small businesses and universities. Federal employees, however, were allowed to keep ownership of their inventions made on the job while employed by the federal government. (it was rumored that the draft of this law was made on a typewriter traced to NIH)
Studies have shown that when government seizes inventions from professors (and students) as in Norway in 2003, patenting and startup activity by researchers decreases. Why think, create, or work hard if some bureaucrat grabs charge and ownership? Better for professors to just work only on seeking research grants and ‘getting along’ to keep themselves employed and their labs running.
Universities then required all professors, employees, AND graduate students (and sometimes even undergraduates) to assign to the university in advance, ALL inventions they might make in the future – NOT JUST THOSE inventions made on government grant funding.
Later, as software and the internet became more important, universities required all professors and students to assign copyright in all software (and some other) works they might make, IN ADVANCE to the university. Professors’ research is typically not fully paid for by the university. Professors typically have to themselves get grants to fund their research and laboratories. And the university takes up to 70% “overhead” from the research funds obtained by their Professors, to fund the university bureaucracy which also takes their inventions. Students, of course must PAY tuition to the university.
Money universities make from licensing these arrogated inventions and copyrights does NOT go back the federal government or the state or city government that funded the university.
Universities are legally privileged because they are supposed to teach and disperse knowledge, not own technology, keep “trade secrets” or impede technical and creative mobility. University bureaucracies are ill-suited to run businesses. Universities primarily want to license drug patents. Inventions that take time, work, intensity, focus, devotion and dedication to develop are less interesting to universities. Many state university licensing departments run at a loss.
Universities have removed the “fuel of interest”, and turned down the “fire of genius” to arrogate power and control at the cost of national technology leadership.
Most research is concentrated at universities. Most university research is government funded. The cumulative result has been to take control of our Nations’ creativity from Professors, and students in the most creative circumstances and times of their lives, and arrogate the previously ” independent entrepreneurial innovation” based on the Constitution, to top-down bureaucratic control of inventions, inventors software and creators. Professors cannot work on their own non-teaching time, not using university labs, to invent anything or write software on their own. This is centrallized Wall street financialization, rather than broad and mobile Main Street production. Take from the individual creators, and give to the central authority. A closed, controlled society. Top down concentration rather than dispersed, individual, bottom-up mobility based on contribution and merit. Except for government employees (such as NIH government employees) who control research funding topics and awards, as well as FDA approvals, and get royalties from drug companies they fund and regulate.
Pretty slick !!
Interesting!
My son has 6 patents for his work at Yahoo…they were the property of Yahoo and his compensation was stock options – at the time quite valuable. At least that system had a reward.
Your son sounds creatively gifted. His patents may be in the area of software process inventions?
Yes, businesses are in the business of business (not Public university teaching). So it is appropriate for companies, which assign employee work, build on prior trade secrets and company expertise, and pay salaries from the enterprise functioning as a whole entity, to own inventions for the sustainability and success of the company. Your son can choose to work for a commercial company and sign the company employment agreement (which may be negotiable for some employees). Or work for another company which may have more limited obligations or specific work assignments. Most companies have a reward system, and promotions, based on creative contributions used by the company. Universities do also, somewhat, sort of, after ‘expenses’, ‘costs’ the univesity ‘cut’., ect, generally without the opportunity to join the licensee with ownership interest.
Private universities can integrate prominent inventors who acheive/negotiate authority and renoun, into startups with venture capital, after taking a cut. Private universities to a large extent are somewhat more like private companies. They can more easily make private employment deals with productive faculty.
But there is no legitimate, Constitutional, or moral reason to grant more economic and social power to Public universities in the patent and copyright systems. A national policy for Public universities to commandeer all inventions and software like a commercial private company, is disasterous for national technology generation, and violates the moral intent of the Constitution with respect to preservation of bottom-up individual rights of the actual inventors and authors. Public universities should not be able to consolidate power over our national technology progress, and should not be facilitated in preventing faculty and students from owning their inventions and software they create on their own. Substantially all Public universities do this in concert. A Professor or student cannot find a Public university which does not generally swipe all inventions and software in advance. For Public universities to universally do this in cahoots with the Federal government not only damages our national technology output and leadership, but also violates the Constitution, IMHO.
The federal government should of course get a simple, free license to any inventions made in the course of federal funding. This license should be available to any US company to serve or sell to the US government, solely for US government use. That will keep US government costs down for things it has funded, rather than paying royalties or monopoly prices, but protect the inventors’ commercial patent rights. (Especially for drug patents – otehr than corruption or stupidity, why should the federal government pay extremely high medicare/VA/DoW prices for drugs for which it has paid the research, chemistry and testing?). But the Bayh Dole legislation grating universities ownership of the actual inventors’ patents has a very complicated economic scheme for when the government has march in rights to get supplied and keep its cost down, which is rarely, if ever, exercised in practice. The whole new University-owned system is corrupt and harmful to inventors, the federal government, and out national technology base.
I have no sympathy for the Universities most of which benefit greatly from practicing capitalism while preaching essentially communism. Engineering, doctors, etc need to learn but there is a lot of baloney they charge for that is ridiculous. I’m just not in favor of having to be compliant in order to advance within a system that pretends to be intellectual. Give me the rebel!
You obviously know a lot about how the system is set up – I agree with the fed benefitting from what the fed funded…only fair. Should be a partnership. Seems to me the ultimate problem is that We the People don’t have serious representation when deals are made at how to spend our tax money. I wish more business people had the guts of DJT to take on the insane government kleptocracy.
My son is getting his masters in AI. He understands what I never would or could understand. 🙂
Wow! Thank you for that. I was unaware of any of that, and it’s horrendous! What a way to kill once-famous American innovation…insert socialism in an insidious way. Sad.
I hope this inheritance isn’t completely squandered – the “warmth of collectivism” is such hogwash.
We’re fighting to prevent that. That’s why you and I are here and other Constitution promoting sites every day. We will reach those lost indoctrinated generations.
Space is our
NEW FRONTIER
As our ancestors were not only TOUGH they also were VERY SMART .
Trump is the world’s greatest strategist to save our country. He’s serious about America First!
And our supposed Allies fall into the traps all the time. This has got to be 10 levels higher than 4d chess.
<This has got to be 10 levels higher than 4d chess.>
Bob Seger said:
‘That’s because he’s always working on his knight moves’ 🙂
Love your response!! Lol
This is why I read this site.
Canada’s Canola oil:
https://heartandsoil.co/blog/canola-oil-dangers/
One of the worst poisons Americans have been ingesting for decades.
I saw a documentary years ago how they export it to be mixed with a small amount of virgin olive oil, rebottled as 100% virgin olive oil and shipped back to the USA for premium $$$.
It’s very difficult to visually or taste the difference, especially because virgin olive oils command is light in color as canola.
You have to trust the olive oil brand you purchase. At that point in time the top (tested) authentic brand was Pompeian.
Just because it says “Italian Olive Oil” does not mean it is a legit true Italian operation.
Just like “Italian-made shoes” command a much higher price, they may not be the original authentic company.
The CCP has been buying those industries that make money but keeping the country of origin and we have no idea we are buying and consuming a cheap China product.
It’s just a bad, sad situation.
O yeah the olive oil scam is real. You have to exercise extreme caution. Pompeian and Bertolli are two of the worst offenders.
This is why I started making my own beef tallow.
I use butter, beef tallow and the bacon fat.. the hell with their toxic food supply.
Hear hear!!!!!
rebranded as “Canola” from “rapeseed oil”
Rapeseed oil is a wonderful, natural healer of burns, and was used a lot in Japan after the nukes were dropped. Once the rapeseed oil was gone they started using other oils, but nothing worked as well as rapeseed oil.
I’d rather be allowed to buy rapeseed oil than the junk they sell that is supposed to be “improved” these days.
Rapeseed oil can be toxic if ingested in large amounts, which is why they thought they needed to improve it, but so can almost everything else if taken in extremes.
It’s also mostly GMO and heavily contaminated with glyphosate, a known carcinogen!
Amen!
Just an observation from the bleachers, even without binoculars.
That is an out-STANDING look for the First Lady. She should do that for real.
My compliments to who ever had this essay posted in 2 parts on another site by 2:24.
Carry On
Mark Carney’s investments are primarily held in a blind trust and include 569 stocks, with 91% of the holdings in U.S.-based companies.
The portfolio features major American corporations across sectors such as technology, banking, energy, and defense
Love to have both countries getting flooded with Chinese “migrants”. Have at it Canada and India..
Time for both to have a major cultural shift too. Imperious Chinese will make you beg for the benign British to come back and elevate your culture.
No, we do not want a Chinese invasion force of any kind in Canada!
Although it will make it easier to vaporize them, still….preferably we want no Chinese population in Canada of any size!
Unfortunately there are Chinese police stations in Canada
Psst. Don’t tell Carney, but the energy that China uses to make the batteries for their EVs comes from burning 13MM tons of coal each and every day…
The funny thing is the EU is always trying to get Trump mad and they think they can win. Remember Trump wanted to be a director and actor in Hollywood. They failed to realize one of his best gifts, he is a great actor and director. All of his supposed fauxpaus were intentional. Almost everything he starts is always hit hard by the arrogant EU, but in the end, they end up as fools. And whats weird, they still think their gang hit on him, they will win.
“Those poor bastards. They’ve got us right where we want ’em… They can’t get away from us now!” (Lt. Gen. Lewis B. “Chesty” Puller, USMC)
FROM TODAY- CARNEY talking about TRUMP – Carney is laughing !!
CPAC@CPAC_TV
“I said this to the president: I meant what I said in Davos. It was clear it was a broader set of issues that Canada was the first country to understand—the change in U.S. trade policy that he had initiated—and we’re responding to that,” says PM Carney re: call with Donald Trump.
https://x.com/CPAC_TV/status/2016162342971588714?s=20
It was clear to the Treehouse about 2 years before it was clear to Carney.
He thinks there is going to be a USMCA (CUSMA).
Is he ever in for a surprise!
I believe he thinks Congress will renew it!!
EU political leaders are so stupid that they actually think that replacing a customer that spends $18.8 trillion (USD) a year with one that spends $2.2 trillion (USD) a year will solve all their problems. Sure, like “green” energy solved all their energy problems. Canada seeks to learn the hard way also.
Their only hope is that the Democrats take back control of the U.S. and finish dispersing America’s wealth to them like they did before until the U.S. finally collapses economically in the greatest dept ever recorded in human history awash in a sea of foreign interlopers that find out too late the non-entitlements were unsustainable. And that’s not a sustainable hope for them.
https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/consumer-spending-by-country
Even more telling is the disposable income by country, because that is what people have to spend on consumer goods that are not necessities. The US lead there is even higher.
Look at what has been going on with the Yen. Japan elected a conservative government. Then began undoing the massive globalist immigration programs.
The globalists responded by attacking the JGB and the Yen.
nothing more disgusting than seeing two men sucking face, pornographic images like that should be banned
Oh, I disagree. Just the thought of two men using each others backdoor is more disgusting.
You just gotta luv that picture. Trump looking like a finely-dressed gentleman, and Melina like a well-dressed flapper! Cruising the city streets of New York, “puttin’ on the Ritz.”
Clothes had great style back then , and were MADE IN AMERICA!
Now, too many people look like beggars * and refugees from a Clown Camp!
* On purpose: I am particularly thinking of the expensive “ripped blue jeans style” !
My peeve is people wearing what are obviously pajamas in public!
So the EU is going to flood their member nations with foreign replacement labor on a much larger scale than before as well. This is painful to watch.
Good luck to them because I don’t think Indians(dot not feather) and Muslims get along very well.
The logic Leyen uses is the most self-defeating there is: “European Commission Chief Ursula von der Leyen has argued that more legal mass migration is needed to reduce illegal entries while announcing a pilot scheme to import migrants into Europe from India.”
That’s like saying we had to lose the match so we wouldn’t lose the match. Winning the match to benefit their own workers never even enters their minds.
https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2025/12/11/eu-chief-claims-more-legal-mass-migration-is-solution-to-illegal-entries-pitches-more-visas-for-indians/
Well one can say hand them a bigger shovel while they dig deeper. Or the favorite is hey ya’ll watch this. Either way stupid is as stupid does and sad to see it happening. White Europeans on the way out. Monty Python skits come to mind again! 🙃
Good. We’ve got enough of them.
Ubisoft hired indians to do the work instead of europeans and canadians. Well the result is what the article is showing. A team of Ubisoft Canada tried to fix all the mistakes made for a new upcoming game but it was so bad they had to scrap it altegher.
https://www.pcgamer.com/gaming-industry/ubisoft-shares-plummet-to-lowest-price-in-over-14-years-amid-its-recently-announced-restructuring-centered-on-cancellations-layoffs-and-generative-ai/
As I read all this, I had the fact that China and India have serious issues together in the back of my mind.
It’s interesting to me that Canada has chosen China and the EU now will dance with India, and yet there is great tension between China and India. I wondered where that all has gone to now given that both countries have just gained these new trading partners seemingly over night- and rather unexpectedly on the part of India and China.
I went on a deep dive and found this great article that gives quite a lot of interesting background.. if you are a nerd that never thinks you have enough context to the context -this if for you.
The article is dated April 2025, so a lot has changed since then, but the background here as to how much got to that date, that is still relevant. It’s a great read. I did some research on this writer and I read a few interviews he did and he seems to have a pretty accurate picture of things that jives with what we’ve read here.
https://asiasociety.org/policy-institute/new-triangle-interplay-between-china-and-eu-india-relations
While she called sovereignty a red line, she alsop discussed total and permanent access for the U.S. military as part of a modernized 1951 agreement.
Correct me if I am wrong, but if a foreign power has total, permanent military access and veto power over your infrastructure ( the word sovereignty becomes more of a philosophical concept than a functional one.
So 75 years later the EU depends on our Military Bases to ‘make ends meet’?
If the USA closed those bases, brought the men and equipment stateside, I think the entire EU would dissolve into fighting each other once again. It seems to be in the bloodline.
I sure hope all the Indian visas go to the Euro weanies. Maybe the number of Indian visas will significantly go down here in the USA. The area where I work in Franklin, TN there is a very tight conclave of Indians. The condos and apartments are filled with Indians. There are at least 6 Indian restaurants in a 1 mile area. There’s even a new Indian market. I’m sure these Indian businesses all received SBA loans. And I’ve heard there’s some maneuver they use to pass the loans between family members. Not sure anymore how that works.
I’m not seeing a whole lot of integration with the community.
Fedex
We can think that the U.S. has all the cards, but we better think again. Europe has just completed a deal with South America, and another with India. We are talking two of the largest economic trade deals ever completed in the history of the world. Most of those who read and post on this website don’t, either know, or, if they do know, don’t believe in the prophesies in the Bible. The Mercosur trade deal takes in Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, and Paraguay. And, in recent years the EU has finalized trade deals with Chile, Peru, Columbia, Mexico, Panama, Costa Rica, Honduras and Nicaragua and also Japan. In the Mercosur deal we are talking 260 million people and a gross domestic product of almost $3 trillion and has all the natural resources that Europe needs to become a superpower. The desire is to cut off the U.S. from world trade. Our 30 plus trillion dollars of debt doesn’t help us either. I don’t have time to explain the biblical prophesies. But, as much as I supported Trump for the presidency, he is allowing his vanity and ego to rule him, and that won’t be good for the U.S.
I do understand your concerns, as well as much of the Bible prophecies you allude to. I’m mainly concerned to see what the Germans will do, now that they’re essentially on their own.
Although …seeing the chancellor actually cry in front of the world stymied many of those concerns. BUT, this is now, and sooner or later, the Germans will harden back to their singular, unflappable core of intellectual rigor and hubris. May God have mercy upon us all.
I also choose to hold on to the following:
A “sovereign nation” requires 3 core elements (think of the 3-legged stool which cannot stand if but one leg is removed). They have to be able to feed themselves, defend themselves, and govern themselves. If we’re being honest, there aren’t that many sovereign nations in the world today.
And that brings me to the most important sentiment you expressed. Namely, IF the United States isn’t very careful, we might just lose that “sovereign” status ourselves. And that’s why I like the direction PDJT is leading us in…A more self-aware and independently driven nation. Let us pray that the external leads to the internal, lest we become a people who are no longer able to govern themselves.
People might be interested in the recent stories of Canadian Premier Doug Ford and his reversal of position on Chinese EV production. Ontario Premier Ford now welcomes Chinese EVs into Canada.
Because Canadian weenies are stoopid. We have lots of time. Let’s wait and see how that goes.
Maybe I have cabin fever or something from the weather here lately, but after reading on this thread, I had the thought that Russia will be our next and best trade partner.
“This is like watching someone you don’t like, get engaged to your smelly, fat ex-girlfriend.”
Mic drop! Wow! Has someone has been hanging around Senator John Kennedy?
p.s. LOVE IT!
While I fully support all that President Trump has done and is doing around the world, I wait hopefully for the day when he turns the same acumen of business and personal attention to the business of dealing with internal insurrection, and I hope he does it as thoroughly.