Judge William Sullivan declared a mistrial after the 12-member jury could not reach a unanimous verdict in the murder trial of Lindsay Clancy.
The defense counsel of Ms Clancy violated every form of judicial ethics in his effort to expose and pressure the one male juror who refused to accept a not guilty verdict and stood his ground. We should not know the identity of the jurors; however, the female foreperson worked with defense lawyer Kevin Reddington to assemble pressure against the juror who would not acquit Clancy.
What took place in this Massachusetts courtroom and jury deliberation undermines the foundation of the system of trial by jury. During actual deliberations defense counsel was openly pressuring Judge Sullivan to remove the juror who would not change his position. A mistrial had to be declared, and Attorney Reddington then went outside and publicly called for retaliation against the male juror who would not accept the position of the female jurors. This is quite remarkable.
Massachusetts – After seven days of deliberation, the judge in Lindsay Clancy’s murder trial declared a mistrial because the jury was unable to reach a unanimous verdict, with one juror refusing to join the eleven others.
Defense attorney Kevin Reddington asked Judge William Sullivan to remove the holdout juror, but Sullivan refused. However, Sullivan granted Reddington an hour to request an emergency stay from a higher court on the mistrial declaration. This would delay the start of a new trial.
Clancy’s case will likely be re-tried with a new jury; until then, she will remain in a psychiatric facility in northeastern Massachusetts. (more)
By the time you have read this, toxic female leftists will likely have publicly identified the name of the lone juror, and soon thereafter the rage of the American pussy hat crowd will organize to destroy the male juror. Jury secrecy and sanctity violations this extreme are horrific and destabilizing to the entire judicial system.
her supporters…..AWFUL – Affluent White Female Ultra Liberal. eeeeeek.
A mistrial had to be declared, and Attorney Reddington then went outside and publicly called for retaliation against the male juror who would not accept the position of the female jurors. This is quite remarkable. (emphasis mine)
Nope. This is Massachusetts.
I wonder how long it would have taken those 11 jurors to come back with a guilty verdict if that demonic witch had strangled three puppies instead of three children!
Both Patrick and Clancy have filed separate lawsuits against several of her medical providers, alleging that they overmedicated Clancy while treating her for postpartum mental health issues.
Patrick has publicly supported his ex-wife from the start and urged the public to ‘find it deep within yourselves to forgive Lindsay, as I have.’
He previously told The New Yorker: ‘I wasn’t married to a monster – I was married to someone who got sick.’
Patrick spent six hours testifying as a prosecution witness during the trial. He told jurors that Lindsay had been a ‘loving mother’ before she was derailed by a months-long battle with postpartum depression, suicidal ideation and sleep deprivation.
Doctors did not warn him about postpartum psychosis or that he should not leave Lindsay alone with the children, he told the court.
https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-16106671/Lindsay-Clancy-patrick-breaks-silence-mistrial.html
The thief on the cross was forgiven by Christ himself but still had to suffer the earthly consequences of his actions.
“someone who got sick”…then I ask…whatever happened to “in sickness and in health”?
And her “sleep deprivation”…what did he, Patrick, do to help her get sleep?
So thankful one man stood. The three deceased children need justice.
Would have absolutely loved for that based Chad to have walked out of the courthouse with both middle fingers held high then abruptly bring his arms down to his crotch and yelled at those lunatics to suck it. What a wild lad that would have been.