Barack Obama and Eric Holder did not create a weaponized DOJ and FBI; instead, what they did was take the preexisting system and retool it so the weapons only targeted one side of the political continuum. This point is where many people understandably get confused.
In the era shortly after 9/11, the DC national security apparatus was constructed to preserve continuity of government and simultaneously view all Americans as potential threats. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) were created specifically for this purpose.
What Barack Obama and Eric Holder did with that new construct was refine the internal targeting mechanisms so that only their ideological opposition became the target of the new national security system. This is very important to understand as you dig deeper into this research outline.
Washington DC created the modern national security apparatus immediately and hurriedly after 9/11/01. DHS came along in 2002, and within the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 the ODNI was formed. When Barack Obama and Eric Holder arrived a few years later, those newly formed institutions were viewed as opportunities to create a very specific national security apparatus that would focus almost exclusively against their political opposition.
The preexisting Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and Dept of Justice (DOJ) were then repurposed to become two of the four pillars of the domestic national security apparatus. However, this new construct would have a targeting mechanism based on political ideology. The DHS, ODNI, DOJ and FBI became the four pillars of this new institution. Atop these pillars is where you will find the Fourth Branch of Government.
We were not sleeping when this happened, we were wide awake. However, we were stunningly distracted by the economic collapse that was taking place in 2006 and 2007 when the engineers behind Obama started to assemble the design. By the time Obama took office in 2009, we sensed something profound was shifting, but we can only see exactly what shifted in the aftermath. The four pillars were put into place, and a new Fourth Branch of Government was quietly created.
As time passed, and the system operators became familiar with their new tools, technology allowed the tentacles of the system to reach out and touch us. That is when we first started to notice that something very disconcerting was happening. Those four pillars are the root of it, and if we take the time to understand how the Fourth Branch originated, questions about this current state of perpetual angst will start to make sense.
Grab a cup of your favorite beverage, and take a walk with me as we outline how this was put together. You might find many of the questions about our current state of political affairs beginning to make a lot more sense.
Remember, it is not my intent to outline the entire history of how we got to this place where the intelligence community now acts as the superseding fourth branch of government. Such an effort would be exhausting and likely take our discussion away from understanding the current dynamic.
History provided enough warnings from Dwight D. Eisenhower (military), to John F. Kennedy (CIA), to Richard Nixon (FBI), to all modern versions of warnings and frustrations from HPSCI Devin Nunes and ODNI Ric Grenell. None of those prior reference points are invalid, and all documented outlines of historic reference are likely true and accurate. However, a generational review is not useful, as the reference impacting us ‘right now‘ gets lost.
Instead, we pick up the expansive and weaponized intelligence system as it manifests after 9/11/01, and my goal is to highlight how the modern version of the total intelligence apparatus has now metastasized into a Fourth Branch of Government. It is this superseding branch that now touches and influences every facet of our life.
If we take the modern construct, originating at the speed of technological change, we can also see how the oversight or “check/balance” in our system of government became functionally obsolescent.
After many years of granular research about the intelligence apparatus inside our government, in the summer of 2020 I visited Washington DC to ask specific questions. My goal was to go where the influence agents within government actually operate, and to discover the people deep inside the institutions no one elected and few people pay attention to.
It was during this process when I discovered how information is purposefully put into containment silos; essentially a formal process to block the flow of information between agencies and between the original branches. While frustrating to discover, the silo effect was important because understanding the communication between networks leads to our ability to reconcile conflict between what we perceive and what’s actually taking place.
After days of research and meetings in DC during 2020; amid a town that was serendipitously shut down due to COVID-19; I found a letter slid under the door of my room in a nearly empty hotel with an introduction of sorts. The subsequent discussions were perhaps the most important. After many hours of specific questions and answers on specific examples, I realized why our nation is in this mess. That is when I discovered the fourth and superseding branch of government, the Intelligence Branch.
I am going to explain how the Intelligence Branch works: (1) to control every other branch of government; (2) how it functions as an entirely independent branch of government with no oversight; (3) how and why it was created to be independent from oversight; (4) what is the current mission of the IC Branch, and most importantly (5) who operates it.
The Intelligence Branch is an independent functioning branch of government, it is no longer a subsidiary set of agencies within the Executive Branch as most would think. To understand the Intelligence Branch, we need to drop the elementary school civics class lessons about three coequal branches of government and replace that outlook with the modern system that created itself.
The Intelligence Branch functions much like the State Dept, through a unique set of public-private partnerships that support it. Big Tech industry collaboration with intelligence operatives is part of that functioning; almost like an NGO. However, the process is much more important than most think. In this problematic perspective of a corrupt system of government, the process is the flaw – not the outcome.
There are people making decisions inside this little known, unregulated and out-of-control branch of government that impact every facet of our lives.
None of the people operating deep inside the Intelligence Branch were elected, and our elected representative House members genuinely do not know how the system works. I assert this position affirmatively because I have talked to House and Senate staffers, including the chiefs of staff for multiple House & Senate committee seats. They are not malicious people; however, they are genuinely clueless of things that happen outside their silo. That is part of the purpose of me explaining it, with examples, in full detail with sunlight.
We begin….
In April of 2016, the FBI launched a counterintelligence operation against presidential candidate Donald Trump. The questioning about that operation is what New York Representative Elise Stefanik cites in March of 2017, approximately 11 months later (First Two Minutes).
Things to note:
♦ Notice how FBI Director James Comey just matter-of-factly explains no one outside the DOJ was informed about the FBI operation. Why? Because that’s just the way things are done. His justification for unilateral operations was “because of the sensitivity of the matter“, totally ignoring any constitutional or regulatory framework for oversight; because, well, quite simply, there isn’t any. The intelligence apparatus inside the DOJ/FBI can, and does, operate based on their own independent determinations of authority.
♦ Notice also how FBI Director Comey shares his perspective that informing the National Security Council (NSC) is the equivalent of notifying the White House. The FBI leadership expressly believe they bear no responsibility to brief the Chief Executive. As long as they tell some unknown, unelected, bureaucratic entity inside the NSC, their unwritten responsibility to inform the top of their institutional silo is complete. If the IC wants to carve out the Oval Office, they simply plant information inside the NSC and, from their perspective, their civic responsibility to follow checks-and-balances is complete. This is an intentional construct.
♦ Notice how Comey obfuscates notification to the Director of National Intelligence (DNI), by avoiding the fact James Clapper was the DNI from outset of the counterintelligence operation throughout the remainder of Obama’s term. When I get deeper into the process, we will understand how the Intelligence Branch has intentionally used the creation of the DNI position (established post 9/11/01) as a method to avoid oversight, not enhance it. Keeping an oblivious doofus like James Clapper in position held strategic value [Doofus Reminder HERE].
That video of James Comey being questioned by Elise Stefanik was the first example given to me by someone who knew the background of everything that was taking place preceding that March 20, 2017, hearing. That FBI reference point is a key to understand how the Intelligence Branch operates with unilateral authority above Congress (legislative branch), above the White House (executive branch), and even above the court system (judicial branch).
Also, watch this short video of James Clapper because it is likely many readers have forgotten, and likely even more readers have never seen it. Watch closely how then White House national security adviser John Brennan is responding in that video. This is before Brennan became CIA Director, this is when Brennan was helping Barack Obama put the pillars into place. WATCH:
[Sidebar: Every time I post this video it gets scrubbed from YouTube (example), so save it if you ever want to see it again.]
The video of James Clapper highlights how the ODNI position (created with good national security intention) ended up becoming the fulcrum for modern weaponization, and is now an office manipulated by agencies with a vested interest in retaining power. The Intelligence Branch holds power over the ODNI through their influence and partnership with the body that authorizes the power within it, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI).
Factually, the modern intelligence apparatus uses checks and balances in their favor. The checks create silos of proprietary information, classified information, vaults of information that work around oversight issues. The silos are part of the problem.
Ironically, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence was created in the aftermath of 9/11/01 expressly to eliminate the silos of information which they felt led to a domestic terrorist attack that could have been prevented. The ODNI was created specifically upon the recommendation of the 9/11 commission.
The intent was to create a central hub of intelligence information, inside the Executive Branch, where the CIA, NSA, DoD, DoS, and DIA could deposit their unique intelligence products and a repository would be created so that domestic intelligence operations, like the DOJ and FBI could access them when needed to analyze threats to the U.S. This, they hoped, would ensure the obvious flags missed in the 9/11 attacks would not be missed again.
The DNI office created a problem for those who operate in the shadows of proprietary information. You’ll see how it was critical to install a person uniquely skilled in being an idiot, James Clapper, into that willfully blind role while intelligence operatives worked around the office to assemble the Intelligence Branch of Government.
• The last federal budget that flowed through the traditional budgetary process was signed into law in September of 2007 for fiscal year 2008 by George W. Bush. Every budget since then has been a fragmented process of continuing resolutions and individual spending bills.
Why does this matter? Because many people think defunding the Intelligence Community is a solution; it is not…. at least, not yet. Worse yet, the corrupt divisions deep inside the U.S. intelligence system can now fund themselves from multinational private sector partnerships (banks, corporations and foreign entities).
• When Democrats took over the House of Representatives in January 2007, they took office with a plan. Nancy Pelosi became Speaker, and Democrats controlled the Senate where Harry Reid was Majority Leader. Barack Obama was a junior senator from Illinois.
Pelosi and Reid intentionally did not advance a budget in 2008 (for fiscal year 2009) because their plan included installing Barack Obama (and all that came with him) with an open checkbook made even more lucrative by a worsening financial crisis and a process called baseline budgeting. Baseline budgeting means the prior fiscal year budget is accepted as the starting point for the next year budget. All previous expenditures are baked into the cake within baseline budgeting.
Massive bailouts preceded Obama’s installation due to U.S. economic collapse, and massive bailouts continued after his installation. This is the ‘never let a crisis go to waste’ aspect. TARP (Troubled Asset Recovery Program), auto bailouts (GM), and the massive stimulus spending bill, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA, ie. those shovel ready jobs) were all part of the non budget spending. The federal reserve assisted with Quantitative Easing (QE1 and QE2) as congress passed various Porkulous spending bills further spending and replacing the formal budget process.
Note: There has never been a budget passed in the normal/traditional process since September of 2007.
• While Obama’s radical ‘transformation‘ was triggered across a broad range of government institutions, simultaneously spending on the U.S. military was cut, but spending on the intelligence apparatus expanded. We were all distracted by Obamacare, and the Republican party wanted to keep us that way. However, in the background there was a process of transformation taking place that included very specific action by Eric Holder and targeted effort toward the newest executive agency the ODNI.
The people behind Obama, those same people now behind Joe Biden, knew from years of strategic planning that ‘radical transformation’ would require control over specific elements inside the U.S. government. Eric Holder played a key role in his position as U.S. Attorney General in the DOJ.
AG Holder recruited ideologically aligned political operatives who were aware of the larger institutional objectives. One of those objectives was weaponizing the DOJ-National Security Division (DOJ-NSD) a division inside the DOJ that had no inspector general oversight. For most people the DOJ-NSD weaponization surfaced with a hindsight awakening of the DOJ-NSD targeting candidate Donald Trump many years later. However, by then the Holder crew had executed almost eight full years of background work.
• The second larger Obama/Holder objective was control over the FBI. Why was that important? Because the FBI does the domestic investigative work on anyone who needs or holds a security clearance. The removal of security clearances could be used as a filter to further build the internal ideological army they were assembling. Additionally, with new power in the ODNI created as a downstream consequence of the Patriot Act, new protocols for U.S. security clearances were easy to justify.
Carefully selecting fellow ideological travelers was facilitated by this filtration within the security clearance process. How does that issue later manifest? Just look around at how politicized every intelligence agency has become, specifically including the FBI.
• At the exact same time this new background security clearance process was ongoing, again everyone distracted by the fight over Obamacare, inside the Department of State (Secretary Hillary Clinton) a political alignment making room for the next phase was being assembled. Names like Samantha Power, Susan Rice and Hillary Clinton were familiar on television while Lisa Monaco worked as a legal liaison between the Obama White House and Clinton State Department.
Through the Dept of State (DoS) the intelligence apparatus began working on their first steps to align Big Tech with a larger domestic institutional objective. Those of you who remember the “Arab Spring”, some say “Islamist Spring”, will remember it was triggered by Barack Obama’s speech in Cairo – his first foreign trip. The State Department worked with grassroots organizers (mostly Muslim Brotherhood) in Egypt, Syria, Bahrain, Qatar and Libya. Obama leaned heavily on the organizational network of Turkish President Recep Erdogan for contacts and support.
Why does this aspect matter to us? Well, you might remember how much effort the Obama administration put into recruiting Facebook and Twitter as resources for the various mideast rebellions the White House and DoS supported. This was the point of modern merge between the U.S. intelligence community and Big Tech social media.
In many ways, the coordinated political outcomes in Libya and Egypt were the beta test for the coordinated domestic political outcomes we saw in the 2020 U.S. presidential election. The U.S. intelligence community working with social media platforms and political operatives.
Overlaying all of that background activity was also a new alignment of the Obama-era intelligence apparatus with ideological federal “contractors“. Where does this contractor activity manifest? In the FISA Court opinion of Rosemary Collyer who cited the “interagency memorandum of understanding”, or MOU.
Hopefully, you can see a small part of how tentacled the system to organize/weaponize the intelligence apparatus was. None of this was accidental, all of this was by design, and the United States Senate was responsible for intentionally allowing most of this to take place.
That’s the 30,000/ft level backdrop history of what was happening as the modern IC was created. Next we will go into how all these various intelligence networks began working in unison and how they currently control all of the other DC institutions under them; including how they can carve out the President from knowing their activity.
♦ When Barack Obama was installed in January 2009, the Democrats held a 60 seat majority in the U.S. Senate. As the people behind the Obama installation began executing their longer-term plan, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence was a tool to create the Intelligence Branch; it was not an unintentional series of events.
When Obama was installed, Dianne Feinstein was the Chair of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI), and Democrat operative Dan Jones was her lead staffer. Feinstein was completely controlled by those around her including Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. The CIA was in the process of turning over personnel following the Bush era, and as a result of a massive multi-year narrative of diminished credibility (Iraq WMD), a deep purge was underway. Obama/Holder were in the process of shifting intelligence alignment and the intensely political Democrat Leader Harry Reid was a key participant.
THE TRAP – Many people say that Congress is the solution to eliminating the Fourth and superseding Branch of Government, the Intelligence Branch. This is an exercise in futility because the Legislative Branch, specifically the SSCI, facilitated the creation of the Intelligence Branch. The SSCI cannot put the genie they created back in the bottle without admitting they too are corrupt; and the background story of their corruption is way too intense to be exposed now.
Every member of the SSCI is compromised in some controlling manner. Those Senators who disliked the control over them; specifically disliked because the risk of sunlight was tenuous and, well, possible; have either left completely or stepped down from the committee. None of the SSCI members past or present would ever contemplate saying openly what their tenure involved.
[Note: You might remember when Vice Chairman Mark Warner’s text messages surfaced, there was a controlled Republican SSCI member who came to his defense in February of 2018. It was not accidental that exact Senator later became the chair of the SSCI himself. That Republican Senator is Marco Rubio, now vice-chair since the Senate re-flipped back to the optics of Democrat control in 2021.]
All of President Obama’s 2009 intelligence appointments required confirmation from the Senate. The nominees had to first pass through the Democrat controlled SSCI, and then to a full Senate vote where Democrats held a 60 vote majority. Essentially, Obama got everyone he wanted in place easily. Rahm Emmanuel was Obama’s Chief of Staff, and Valerie Jarrett was Senior Advisor.
Tim Geithner was Treasury Secretary in 2010 when the joint DOJ/FBI and IRS operation to target the Tea Party took place after the midterm “shellacking” caused by the Obamacare backlash. Mitch McConnell was Minority Leader in the Senate but supported the targeting of the Tea Party as his Senate colleagues were getting primaried by an angry and effective grassroots campaign. McConnell’s friend, Senator Bob Bennett, getting beaten in Utah was the final straw.
Dirty Harry and Mitch McConnell saw the TEA Party through the same prism. The TEA Party took Kennedy’s seat in Massachusetts (Scott Brown); Sharon Angle was about to take out Harry Reid in Nevada; Arlen Spector was taken down in Pennsylvania; Senator Robert Byrd died; Senator Lisa Murkowski lost her primary to Joe Miller in Alaska; McConnell’s nominee Mike Castle lost to Christine O’Donnell in Delaware; Rand Paul won in Kentucky. This is the background. The peasants were revolting…. and visibly angry Mitch McConnell desperately made a deal with the devil to protect himself.
In many ways, the TEA Party movement was/is very similar to the MAGA movement. The difference in 2010 was the absence of a head of the movement, in 2015 Donald Trump became that head figure who benefited from the TEA Party energy. Trump came into office in 2017 with the same congressional opposition as the successful TEA Party candidates in 2011.
Republicans took control of the Senate following the 2014 mid-terms. Republicans took control of the SSCI in January 2015. Senator Richard Burr became chairman of the SSCI, and Dianne Feinstein shifted to Vice-Chair. Dirty Harry Reid left the Senate, and Mitch McConnell took power again.
Republicans were in control of the Senate Intelligence Committee in 2015 when the Intelligence Branch operation against candidate Donald Trump was underway. [Feinstein’s staffer, Dan Jones, left the SSCI so he could act as a liaison and political operative between private-sector efforts (Fusion GPS, Chris Steele) and the SSCI.] The SSCI was a participant in that Fusion-GPS/Chris Steele operation, and as a direct consequence Republicans were inherently tied to the problem with President Trump taking office in January of 2017. Indiana Republican Senator Dan Coats was a member of the SSCI.
Bottom line…. When it came to the intelligence system targeting Donald Trump during the 2015/2016 primary, the GOP was just as much at risk as their Democrat counterparts.
When Trump unexpectedly won the 2016 election, the SSCI was shocked more than most. They knew countermeasures would need to be deployed to protect themselves from any exposure of their intelligence conduct. Dianne Feinstein stepped down, and Senator Mark Warner was elevated to Vice Chairman.
Indiana’s own Mike Pence, now Vice President, recommended fellow Hoosier, SSCI Senator Dan Coats, to become President Trump’s Director of National Intelligence (ODNI). [Apply hindsight here]
• To give an idea of the Intelligence Branch power dynamic, remind yourself how House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI), Chairman Devin Nunes, tried to get access to the DOJ/FBI records of the FISA application used against the Trump campaign via Carter Page.
Remember, Devin Nunes only saw a portion of the FISA trail from his review of a Presidential Daily Brief (PDB) previously given to President Obama. Chairman Nunes had to review the PDB at the White House SCIF due to compartmented intelligence, another example of the silo benefit.
Remember the massive stonewalling and blocking of the DOJ/FBI toward Nunes? Remember the back and forth battle over declassification surrounding the Nunes memo?
Remember, after Nunes went directly to House Speaker Paul Ryan for help (didn’t get any), the DOJ only permitted two members from each party within the HPSCI to review the documents, and only at the DOJ offices of main justice?
Contrast that amount of House Intel Committee railroading and blocking by intelligence operatives in the DOJ, DOJ-NSD and FBI, with the simple request by Senate Intelligence Vice Chairman Mark Warner asking to see the Carter Page FISA application and immediately a copy being delivered to him on March 17th 2017.
Can you see which intelligence committee is aligned with the deepest part of the deep state?
Oh, how quickly we forget:
The contrast of ideological alignment between the House, Senate and Intelligence Branch is crystal clear when viewed through the prism of cooperation. You can see which legislative committee holds the power and support of the Intelligence Branch. The Senate Intel Committee facilitates the corrupt existence of the IC Branch, so the IC Branch only cooperates with the Senate Intel Committee. It really is that simple.
• The Intelligence Branch carefully selects its own members by controlling how security clearances are investigated and allowed (FBI). The Intelligence Branch also uses compartmentalization of intelligence as a way to keep each agency, and each downstream branch of government (executive, legislative and judicial), at arms length as a method to stop anyone from seeing the larger picture of their activity. I call this the “silo effect“, and it is done by design.
I have looked at stunned faces when I presented declassified silo product from one agency to the silo customers of another. You would be astonished at what they don’t know because it is not in their ‘silo’.
Through the advise and consent rules, the Intelligence Branch uses the SSCI to keep out people they consider dangerous to their ongoing operations. Any appointee to the intelligence community must first pass through the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, before they get a full Senate vote. If the SSCI rejects the candidate, they simply refuse to take up the nomination. The president is then blocked from that appointment. This is what happened with President Trump over-and-over again.
• Additionally, the Intelligence Branch protects itself, and its facilitating allies through the formal classification process. The Intelligence Branch gets to decide unilaterally what information will be released and what information will be kept secret. There is no entity outside the Intelligence Branch, and yes that includes the President of the United States, who can supersede the classification authority of the Intelligence Branch. {Go Deep} and {Go Deep} This is something 99.9% of the people on our side get totally and frustratingly wrong.
No one can declassify, or make public, anything the Intelligence Branch will not agree to. Doubt this? Ask Ric Grenell, John Ratcliffe, or even President Trump himself.
• The classification process is determined inside the Intelligence Branch, all by themselves. They get to choose what rank of classification exists on any work-product they create; and they get to decide what the classification status is of any work product that is created by anyone else. The Intelligence Branch has full control over what is considered classified information and what is not. The Intelligence Branch defines what is a “national security interest” and what is not. A great technique for hiding fingerprints of corrupt and illegal activity.
[For familiar reference see the redactions to Lisa Page and Peter Strzok text messages. The Intelligence Branch does all redactions.]
• Similarly, the declassification process is a request by an agency, even a traditionally superior agency like the President of the United States, to the Intelligence Branch asking for them to release the information. The Intelligence Branch again holds full unilateral control. If the head of the CIA refuses to comply with the declassification instruction of the President, what can the president do except fire him/her? {Again, GO DEEP} How does the President replace the non-compliant cabinet member? They have to go through the SSCI confirmation. See the problem?
Yes, there are ways to break up the Intelligence Branch, but they do not start with any congressional effort. As you can see above, the process is the flaw – not the solution. Most conservative pundits have their emphasis on the wrong syllable. Their cornerstone is false.
For their own self-preservation, the Intelligence Branch has been interfering in our elections for years. The way to tear this apart begins with STATE LEVEL election reform that blocks the Legislative Branch from coordinating with the Intelligence Branch.
The extreme federalism approach is critical and also explains why Joe Biden has instructed Attorney General Merrick Garland to use the full power of the DOJ to stop state level election reform efforts. The worry of successful state level election control is also why the Intelligence Branch now needs to support the federal takeover of elections.
Our elections have been usurped by the Intelligence Branch. Start with honest elections and we will see just how much Democrat AND Republican corruption is dependent on manipulated election results. Start at the state level. Start there…. everything else is downstream.
♦ People want examples, reference points for work the Intelligence Branch conducts, specifically how it protects itself.
Here is an example: Julian Assange.
Yes, the history of the U.S. national security apparatus goes back decades; however, the weaponization of that apparatus, the creation of an apex branch of government, the Intelligence Branch, originated –as we currently feel it– under President Barack Obama.
Obama took the foundational tools created by Bill Clinton and George W. Bush and used the intelligence system architecture to create a weapon for use in his fundamental transformation. An alliance of ideologues within government (intel community) and the private sector (big tech and finance) was assembled, and the largest government weapon was created. Think about this every time you take your shoes off at an airport.
After the weapon was assembled and tested (Arab Spring), the Legislative Branch was enjoined under the auspices of a common enemy, Donald J. Trump, an outsider who was a risk to every entity in the institutional construct of Washington DC. Trillions were at stake, and years of affluence and influence were at risk as the unholy alliance was put together.
To understand the risk that Julian Assange represented to U.S. Intelligence Branch interests, it is important to understand just how extensive the operations of the FBI/CIA were in 2016.
It is within the network of foreign and domestic intel operations where Intelligence Branch political tool, FBI Agent Peter Strzok, was working as a bridge between the CIA and FBI counterintelligence operations.
By now, people are familiar with the construct of CIA operations involving Joseph Mifsud, the Maltese professor generally identified as a western intelligence operative who was tasked by the FBI/CIA to run an operation against Trump campaign official George Papadopoulos in both Italy (Rome) and London. {Go Deep}
In a similar fashion, the FBI tasked U.S. intelligence asset Stefan Halper to target another Trump campaign official, Carter Page. Under the auspices of being a Cambridge Professor, Stefan Halper also targeted General Michael Flynn. Additionally, using assistance from a female FBI agent under the false name Azra Turk, Halper also targeted Papadopoulos.
The initial operations to target Flynn, Papadopoulos and Page were all based overseas. This seemingly makes the CIA exploitation of the assets and the targets much easier.
HPSCI Ranking Member Devin Nunes outlined how very specific exculpatory evidence was known to the FBI and yet withheld from the FISA application used against Carter Page that also mentions George Papadopoulos. The FBI also fabricated information in the FISA.
However, there is an aspect to the domestic U.S. operation that also bears the fingerprints of the international intelligence apparatus; only this time, due to the restrictive laws on targets inside the U.S., the CIA aspect is less prominent. This is where FBI Agent Peter Strzok working for both agencies was important.
Remember, it’s clear in the text messages Strzok had a working relationship with what he called their “sister agency”, the CIA. Additionally, former CIA Director John Brennan has admitted Strzok helped write the January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) which outlines the Russia narrative; and Peter Strzok wrote the July 31st, 2016, “Electronic Communication” that originated FBI operation “Crossfire Hurricane.” Strzok immediately used that EC to travel to London to debrief allied intelligence officials connected to the Australian Ambassador to the U.K, Alexander Downer.
In short, Peter Strzok acted as a bridge between the CIA and the FBI. The perfect type of FBI career agent for the Intelligence Branch and CIA Director John Brennan to utilize.
Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson hired CIA Open Source analyst Nellie Ohr toward the end of 2015; at appropriately the same time as “FBI Contractors” were identified exploiting the NSA database and extracting information on a specific set of U.S. persons, the 2015 GOP candidates for President.
It was also Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson who was domestically tasked with a Russian lobbyist named Natalia Veselnitskaya. A little reported Russian Deputy Attorney General named Saak Albertovich Karapetyan was working double agents for the CIA and Kremlin. Karapetyan was directing the foreign operations of Natalia Veselnitskaya, and Glenn Simpson was organizing her inside the U.S.
Glenn Simpson managed Veselnitskaya through the 2016 Trump Tower meeting with Donald Trump Jr. However, once the CIA/Fusion-GPS operation using Veselnitskaya started to unravel with public reporting… back in Russia Deputy AG Karapetyan died in a helicopter crash.
Simultaneously timed in late 2015 through mid 2016, there was a domestic FBI operation using a young Russian named Maria Butina tasked to run up against republican presidential candidates. According to Patrick Byrne, Butina’s private sector handler [NOTE: remember, the public-private sector partnership], it was FBI agent Peter Strzok who was giving Patrick Byrne the instructions on where to send Butina. {Go Deep}
All of this context outlines the extent to which the FBI/CIA was openly involved in constructing a political operation that eventually settled upon anyone in candidate Donald Trump’s orbit. The international operations of the Intelligence Branch were directed by the FBI/CIA; and the domestic operations were coordinated by Peter Strzok operating with a foot in both agencies. [Strzok gets CIA service coin]
Recap: ♦Mifsud tasked against Papadopoulos (CIA). ♦Halper tasked against Flynn (CIA), Page (CIA), and Papadopoulos (CIA). ♦Azra Turk, pretending to be a Halper asst, tasked against Papadopoulos (FBI). ♦Veselnitskaya tasked against Donald Trump Jr (CIA, Fusion-GPS). ♦Butina tasked against Donald Trump Jr (FBI). All of these activities were coordinated.
Additionally, Christopher Steele was a British intelligence officer, hired by Fusion GPS to assemble and launder fraudulent intelligence information within his dossier. And we cannot forget Oleg Deripaska, a Russian oligarch, who was recruited by Asst. FBI Director Andrew McCabe to participate in running an operation against the Trump campaign and create the impression of Russian involvement. However, Deripaska refused to participate.
All of this foreign and domestic engagement was directly controlled by collaborating U.S. intelligence agencies from inside the Intelligence Branch. And all of this coordinated activity was intended to give a specific Russia influence/interference impression.
♦ The key point of all that background context is to see how committed the Intelligence Branch was to the constructed narrative of Russia interfering with the 2016 election. The CIA, FBI, and by extension the DOJ and DOJ-NSD, put a hell of a lot of work into it.
We also know that John Durham looked at the construct of the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA); and talked to CIA analysts who participated in the construct of the January 2017 report that bolstered the false appearance of Russian interference in the 2016 election. This is important because it ties in to the next part that involves Julian Assange and Wikileaks.
On April 11th, 2019, the Julian Assange indictment was unsealed in the EDVA. From the indictment we discover it was under seal since March 6th, 2018:
On Tuesday April 15th more investigative material was released. Again, note the dates: Grand Jury, *December of 2017* This means FBI investigation prior to….
The FBI investigation took place prior to December 2017, and it was coordinated through the Eastern District of Virginia (EDVA) where Dana Boente was U.S. Attorney at the time. The grand jury indictment was sealed from March of 2018 until after Mueller completed his investigation, April 2019.
Why the delay?
What was the DOJ waiting for?
Here’s where it gets interesting….
The FBI submission to the Grand Jury in December of 2017 was four months after Congressman Dana Rohrabacher talked to Julian Assange in August of 2017: “Assange told a U.S. congressman … he can prove the leaked Democratic Party documents … did not come from Russia.”
(August 2017, The Hill Via John Solomon) Julian Assange told a U.S. congressman on Tuesday he can prove the leaked Democratic Party documents he published during last year’s election did not come from Russia and promised additional helpful information about the leaks in the near future.
Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, a California Republican who is friendly to Russia and chairs an important House subcommittee on Eurasia policy, became the first American congressman to meet with Assange during a three-hour private gathering at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, where the WikiLeaks founder has been holed up for years.
Rohrabacher recounted his conversation with Assange to The Hill.
“Our three-hour meeting covered a wide array of issues, including the WikiLeaks exposure of the DNC [Democratic National Committee] emails during last year’s presidential election,” Rohrabacher said, “Julian emphatically stated that the Russians were not involved in the hacking or disclosure of those emails.”
Pressed for more detail on the source of the documents, Rohrabacher said he had information to share privately with President Trump. (read more)
Knowing how much effort the Intelligence Branch put into the false Russia collusion-conspiracy narrative, it would make sense for the FBI to take keen interest after this August 2017 meeting between Rohrabacher and Assange, monitor all activity, and why the FBI would quickly gather specific evidence (related to Wikileaks and Bradley Manning) for a grand jury by December 2017.
Within three months of the EDVA grand jury, the DOJ generated an indictment and sealed it in March 2018.
The DOJ sat on the indictment while the Mueller/Weissmann probe was ongoing.
As soon as the Mueller/Weissmann probe ended, on April 11th, 2019, a planned and coordinated effort between the U.K. and U.S. was executed; Julian Assange was forcibly arrested and removed from the Ecuadorian embassy in London, and the EDVA indictment was unsealed (link).
As a person who has researched this fiasco; including the ridiculously false 2016 Russian hacking/interference narrative: “17 intelligence agencies”, Joint Analysis Report (JAR) needed for Obama’s anti-Russia narrative in December ’16; and then a month later the ridiculously political Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) in January ’17; this timing against Assange is too coincidental.
It doesn’t take a deep researcher to see the aligned Deep State motive to control Julian Assange. The Weissmann/Mueller report was dependent on Russia cybercrimes for justification, and that narrative was contingent on the Russia DNC hack story which Julian Assange disputes.
♦ This is critical. The Weissmann/Mueller report contains claims that Russia hacked the DNC servers as the central element to the Russia interference narrative in the U.S. election. This claim is directly disputed by WikiLeaks and Julian Assange, as outlined during the Dana Rohrabacher interview, and by Julian Assange on-the-record statements.
The predicate for Robert Mueller’s investigation was specifically due to Russian interference in the 2016 election.
The fulcrum for this Russia interference claim is the intelligence community assessment; and the only factual evidence claimed within the ICA is that Russia hacked the DNC servers; a claim only made possible by relying on forensic computer analysis from Crowdstrike, a DNC and FBI contractor.
The CIA holds a self-interest in upholding the Russian hacking claim; the FBI holds an interest in maintaining that claim; the U.S. media hold an interest in maintaining that claim. All of the foreign countries whose intelligence apparatus participated with Brennan and Strzok also have a self-interest in maintaining that Russia hacking and interference narrative.
Julian Assange is the only person with direct knowledge of how Wikileaks gained custody of the DNC emails; and Assange has claimed he has evidence it was not from a hack.
This “Russian hacking” claim was ultimately important to the CIA, FBI, DOJ, ODNI and U.K intelligence apparatus, it forms the corner of their justification. With that level of importance, well, right there is the obvious motive to shut Julian Assange down as soon as intelligence officials knew the Weissmann/Mueller report was going to be public.
…. and that’s exactly what they did. They threw a bag over Assange.
♦ COLLAPSED OVERSIGHT – The modern system to ‘check’ the Executive Branch was the creation of the legislative “Gang of Eight,” a legislative oversight mechanism intended to provide a bridge of oversight between the authority of the intelligence community within the Executive Branch.
The Go8 construct was designed to allow the President authority to carry out intelligence operations and provide the most sensitive notifications to a select group within Congress.
The Go8 oversight is directed to the position, not the person, and consists of: (1) The Speaker of the House; (2) The Minority Leader of the House; (3) The Chair of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, HPSCI; (4) The Ranking Member (minority) of the HPSCI; (5) The Leader of the Senate; (6) The Minority Leader of the Senate; (7) The Chair of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, SSCI; and finally (8) the Vice-Chair of the SSCI.
Example: When the Chief Executive (the President) initiates an intelligence operation on behalf of the United States, the President triggers a “finding memo.” In essence, the instruction to the intel agency or agencies to authorize a covert operation. When that process takes place, the Go8 are the first people notified. Depending on the sensitivity of the operation, sometimes the G08 are notified immediately after the operation is conducted. The notification can be a phone call or an in-person briefing.
Because of the sensitivity of their intelligence information, the Gang of Eight hold security clearances that permit them to receive and review all intelligence operations. The intelligence community are also responsible for briefing the Go8 with the same information they use to brief the President.
~ 2021 Gang of Eight ~
The Go8 design is intended to put intelligence oversight upon both political parties in Congress; it is designed that way by informing the minority leaders of both the House and Senate as well as the ranking minority members of the SSCI and HPSCI. Under the concept, the President cannot conduct an intelligence operation; and the intelligence community cannot carry out intelligence gathering operations without the majority and minority parties knowing about it.
The modern design of this oversight system was done to keep rogue and/or corrupt intelligence operations from happening. However, as we shared in the preview to this entire discussion, the process was usurped during the Obama era. {GO DEEP}
Former FBI Director James Comey openly admitted to Congress on March 20, 2017, that the FBI, FBI Counterintelligence Division, DOJ and DOJ-National Security Division, together with the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) and the CIA, had been conducting independent investigations of Donald Trump for over a year without informing the Go8. Comey justified the lack of informing Go8 oversight by saying, “because of the sensitivity of the matter.”
Stupidly, Congress never pressed James Comey on that issue. The arrogance was astounding, and the acceptance by Congress was infuriating. However, that specific example highlighted just how politically corrupt the system had become. In essence, Team Obama usurped the entire design of congressional oversight…. and Congress just brushed it off.
Keep in mind, Comey did not say the White House was unaware; in fact he said exactly the opposite, he said, “The White House was informed through the National Security Council,” (the NSC). The implication, the very direct and specific implication; the unavoidable implication and James Comey admission that everyone just brushed aside, was that President Obama’s National Security Advisor, Susan Rice, was totally informed of the intelligence operation(s) against Donald Trump. After all, the NSC reports to the National Security Advisor.
Does the January 20, 2017, Susan Rice memo look different now?
Again, no one saw the immediate issue. What Comey just described on that March day in 2017 was the total usurpation of the entire reason the Gang of Eight exists; to eliminate the potential for political weaponization of the Intelligence Community by the executive branch. The G08 notifications to the majority and minority are specifically designed to make sure what James Comey admitted to doing was never supposed to happen.
Team Obama carried out a political operation using the intelligence community and the checks-and-balances in the system were intentionally usurped. This is an indisputable fact.
Worse still, the entire legislative branch of Congress, which specifically includes the Republicans that now controlled the House and Senate, did nothing. They just ignored what was admitted. The usurpation was willfully ignored. The mechanism of the G08 was bypassed without a twitch of condemnation or investigation…. because the common enemy was Donald Trump.
This example highlights the collapse of the system. Obama, the executive branch, collapsed the system by usurping the process; in essence the process became the bigger issue and the lack of immediate legislative branch reaction became evidence of open acceptance. The outcomes of the usurpation played out over the next four years, Donald J. Trump was kneecapped and lost his presidency because of it. However, the bigger issue of the collapse still exists.
The downstream consequence of the Legislative Branch accepting the Executive Branch usurpation meant both intelligence committees were compromised. Additionally, the leadership of both the House and Senate were complicit. Think about this carefully. The Legislative Branch allowance of the intelligence usurpation meant the Legislative Branch was now subservient to the Intelligence Branch.
That’s where we are.
Right now.
That’s where we are.
Term-3 Obama is now back in the White House with Joe Biden.
Term-1 and Term-2 Obama usurped the ‘check and balance‘ within the system and weaponized the intelligence apparatus. During Trump’s term that weaponization was covered up by a compliant congress, and not a single member of the oversight called it out. Now, Term-3 Obama steps back in to continue the cover up and continue the weaponization.
Hopefully, you can now see the scale of the problem that surrounds us with specific citation for what has taken place. What I just explained to you above is not conspiracy theory, it is admitted fact that anyone can look upon. Yet….
Have you seen this mentioned anywhere? Have you seen this called out by anyone in Congress? Have you seen anyone in media (ally or adversary) call this out? Have you seen any member of the Judicial Branch stand up and say wait, what is taking place is not okay? Have you seen a single candidate for elected office point this out? Have you seen anyone advising a candidate point this out?
This is our current status. It is not deniable. The truth exists regardless of our comfort.
Not a single person in power will say openly what has taken place. They are scared of the Fourth Branch. The evidence of what has taken place is right there in front of our face. The words, actions and activities of those who participated in this process are not deniable.
There are only two members of the Gang of Eight who have existed in place from January 2007 (the real beginning of Obama’s term, two years before he took office when the Congress flipped). Only two members of the G08 have been consistently in place from January of 2007 to right now, today. All the others came and went, but two members of the Gang of Eight have been part of that failed and collapsed oversight throughout the past 15 years, Nancy Pelosi and Mitch McConnell.
♦ TECHNOLOGY – On a global scale – the modern intelligence gathering networks are now dependent on data collection to execute their intelligence missions. In the digital age nations have been executing various methods to gather that data. Digital surveillance has replaced other methods of interception. Those surveillance efforts have resulted in a coalescing of regional data networks based on historic multi-national relationships.
We have a recent frame of reference for the “U.S. data collection network” within the NSA. Through the allied process the Five Eyes nations all rely on the NSA surveillance database (U.K, Australia, Canada, New Zealand and U.S.) The NSA database provides the digital baseline for intelligence operations in defense of our allies. The portals into the NSA database are essentially an assembly of allies in like-minded ideological connection to the United States.
Unfortunately, there have been some revelations about the NSA database being used to monitor our allies, like in the example of Germany and surveillance on Angela Merkel’s phone. As long as “the good guys” are operating honorably, allies of the United States can feel confident about having protection from the NSA surveillance of global digital data. We warn our friends if we detect something dangerous etc.
The U.S. has nodes on communication pipelines to intercept and extract data. We have also launched hundreds, perhaps thousands, of satellites to conduct surveillance and gather up data. All of this data is fed into the NSA database where it is monitored (presumably) as a national security mechanism, and in defense of our allies.
However, what about data collection or data networks that are outside the NSA database? What do our enemies do? The NSA database is just one intelligence operation of digital surveillance amid the entire world, and we do not allow access by adversaries we are monitoring. So what do they do? What do our allies do who might not trust the United States due to past inconsistencies, ie. the Middle East?
The answers to those questions highlight other data collection networks. So a brief review of the major players is needed.
♦ CHINA – China operates their own database. They, like the NSA, scoop up data for their system. Like us, China launches satellites and deploys other electronic data collection methods to download into their database. This is why the issues of electronic devices manufactured in China becomes problematic. Part of the Chinese data collection system involves the use of spyware, hacking and extraction.
Issues with Chinese communication company Huawei take on an added dimension when you consider the goal of the Chinese government to conduct surveillance and assemble a network of data to compete with the United States via the NSA. Other Chinese methods of surveillance and data-collection are less subversive, as in the examples of TicTok and WeChat. These are Chinese social media companies that are scraping data just like the NSA scrapes data from Facebook, Twitter and other Silicon Valley tech companies. [ Remember, the Intelligence Branch is a public-private partnership. ]
♦ RUSSIA – It is very likely that Russia operates their own database. We know Russia launches satellites, just like China and the USA, for the same purposes. Russia is also very proficient at hacking into other databases and extracting information to store and utilize in their own network. The difference between the U.S., China and Russia is likely that Russia spends more time on the hacking aspect because they do not generate actual technology systems as rapidly as the U.S. and China.
The most recent database creation is an outcome of an ally having to take action because they cannot rely on the ideology of the United States remaining consistent, as the administrations ping-pong based on ideology.
♦ SAUDI ARABIA – Yes, in 2016 we discovered that Saudi Arabia was now operating their own intelligence data-gathering operation. It would make sense, given the nature of the Middle East and the constant fluctuations in political support from the United States. It is a lesson the allied Arab community and Gulf Cooperation Council learned quickly when President Obama went to Cairo in 2009 and launched the Islamist Spring (Arab Spring) upon them.
I have no doubt the creation of the Saudi intelligence network was specifically because the Obama administration started supporting radical Islamists within the Muslim Brotherhood, and threw fuel on the fires of extremism all over the Arab world.
Think about it., What would you do if you were Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Bahrain, Kuwait, the UAE, Jordan, Oman or Yemen and you knew the United States could just trigger an internal uprising of al-Qaeda, ISIS and the political arm of the Muslim Brotherhood to seek your destruction?
Without a doubt, those urgent lessons from 2009, 2010, 2011 triggered the formation of the Arab Intelligence Network as a network to defend itself with consistency. They assembled the network and activated it in 2017 as pictured above.
♦ Israel – Along a similar outlook to the Arab network, no doubt Israel operates an independent data collection system as a method of protecting itself from ever-changing U.S. politics amid a region that is extremely hostile to its very existence. Like the others, Israel launches proprietary satellites, and we can be sure they use covert methods to gather electronic data just like the U.S. and China.
As we have recently seen in the Pegasus story, Israel creates spyware programs that are able to track and monitor cell phone communications of targets. The spyware would not work unless Israel had access to some network where the phone meta-data was actually stored. So yeah, it makes sense for Israel to operate an independent intelligence database.
♦ Summary: As we understand the United States Intelligence Branch of government as the superseding entity that controls the internal politics of our nation, we also must consider that multiple nations have the same issue. There are major intelligence networks around the world beside the NSA “Five-Eyes” database. China, Russia, Saudi Arabia and Israel all operate proprietary databases deploying the same tools and techniques for assembly.
The geopolitical conflict that has always existed has now shifted into a digital battle-space. The Intelligence Agencies from these regions are now operating as the backbone of the government that uses them, and has become dependent on them. [<- Reread that].
Once you accept the digital-era intelligence apparatus of China, Russia, Saudi-Arabia, The United States and Israel, are now the primary national security mechanisms for stabilization of government; then you accept the importance of those intelligence operations.
Once you understand how foundational those modern intelligence operations have become for the stability and continuity of those governments…… then you begin to understand just how the United States intelligence community became more important than the government that created it.
♦ Public Private Partnership – The modern Fourth Branch of Government is only possible because of a Public-Private partnership with the intelligence apparatus. You do not have to take my word for it, the partnership is so brazen they have made public admissions.
The biggest names in Big Tech announced in June their partnership with the Five Eyes intelligence network, ultimately controlled by the NSA, to: (1) monitor all activity in their platforms; (2) identify extremist content; (3) look for expressions of Domestic Violent Extremism (DVE); and then, (4) put the content details into a database where the Five Eyes intelligence agencies (U.K., U.S., Australia, Canada, New Zealand) can access it.
Facebook, Twitter, Google and Microsoft are all partnering with the intelligence apparatus. It might be difficult to fathom how openly they admit this, but they do. Look at this sentence in the press release (emphasis mine):
[…] “The Group will use lists from intelligence-sharing group Five Eyes adding URLs and PDFs from more groups, including the Proud Boys, the Three Percenters and neo-Nazis.”
Think about that sentence structure very carefully. They are “adding to” the preexisting list…. admitting the group (aka Big Tech) already have access to the the intelligence-sharing database… and also admitting there is a preexisting list created by the Five Eyes consortium.
Obviously, who and what is defined as “extremist content” will be determined by the Big Tech insiders themselves. This provides a gateway, another plausible deniability aspect, to cover the Intelligence Branch from any oversight.
When the Intelligence Branch within government wants to conduct surveillance and monitor American citizens, they run up against problems due to the Constitution of the United States. They get around those legal limitations by sub-contracting the intelligence gathering, the actual data-mining, and allowing outside parties (contractors) to have access to the central database.
The government cannot conduct electronic searches (4th amendment issue) without a warrant; however, private individuals can search and report back as long as they have access. What is being admitted is exactly that preexisting partnership. The difference is that Big Tech will flag the content from within their platforms, and now a secondary database filled with the extracted information will be provided openly for the Intelligence Branch to exploit.
The volume of metadata captured by the NSA has always been a problem because of the filters needed to make the targeting useful. There is a lot of noise in collecting all data that makes the parts you really want to identify more difficult to capture. This new admission puts a new massive filtration system in the metadata that circumvents any privacy protections for individuals.
Previously, the Intelligence Branch worked around the constitutional and unlawful search issue by using resources that were not in the United States. A domestic U.S. agency, working on behalf of the U.S. government, cannot listen on your calls without a warrant. However, if the U.S. agency sub-contracts to say a Canadian group, or foreign ally, the privacy invasion is no longer legally restricted by U.S. law.
What was announced in June 2021 is an alarming admission of a prior relationship along with open intent to define their domestic political opposition as extremists.
July 26 (Reuters) – A counterterrorism organization formed by some of the biggest U.S. tech companies including Facebook (FB.O) and Microsoft (MSFT.O) is significantly expanding the types of extremist content shared between firms in a key database, aiming to crack down on material from white supremacists and far-right militias, the group told Reuters.
Until now, the Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism’s (GIFCT) database has focused on videos and images from terrorist groups on a United Nations list and so has largely consisted of content from Islamist extremist organizations such as Islamic State, al Qaeda and the Taliban.
Over the next few months, the group will add attacker manifestos – often shared by sympathizers after white supremacist violence – and other publications and links flagged by U.N. initiative Tech Against Terrorism. It will use lists from intelligence-sharing group Five Eyes, adding URLs and PDFs from more groups, including the Proud Boys, the Three Percenters and neo-Nazis.
The firms, which include Twitter (TWTR.N) and Alphabet Inc’s (GOOGL.O) YouTube, share “hashes,” unique numerical representations of original pieces of content that have been removed from their services. Other platforms use these to identify the same content on their own sites in order to review or remove it. (read more)
The influence of the Intelligence Branch now reaches into our lives, our personal lives. In the decades before 9/11/01 the intelligence apparatus intersected with government, influenced government, and undoubtedly controlled many institutions with it. The legislative oversight function was weak and growing weaker, but it still existed and could have been used to keep the IC in check. However, after the events of 9/11/01, the short-sighted legislative reactions opened the door to allow the surveillance state to weaponize.
After the Patriot Act was triggered, not coincidentally only six weeks after 9/11, a slow and dangerous fuse was lit that ends with the intelligence apparatus being granted a massive amount of power. The problem with assembled power is always what happens when a Machiavellian network takes control over that power and begins the process to weaponize the tools for their own malicious benefit. That is exactly what the installation of Barack Obama was all about.
The Obama network took pre-assembled intelligence weapons we should never have allowed to be created, and turned those weapons into tools for his radical and fundamental change. The target was the essential fabric of our nation. Ultimately, this corrupt political process gave power to create the Fourth Branch of Government, the Intelligence Branch. From that perspective the fundamental change was successful.
♦ WHAT NOW? There is a way to stop and deconstruct the Intelligence Branch, but it requires some outside-the-box thinking and reliance on the Constitution as a tool to radically change one element within government. In the interim, we must remain focused on the three tiers that we need for success.
• Tier One is “tactical civics” at a local level. Engaged and active citizen participation at the community, city, town and hamlet level of society. This is what might be described as grassroots level, school board level; city council level; county commissioner level.
• Tier Two is “extreme federalism” at a state level. Engaged and active citizen participation through your State House and State Senate representative. This is state level assembly and action demands upon the State House, State Senate and State Governor.
• Tier Three the challenge of “federal offices” on a national level {Go Deep}. This is the part where we need President Donald Trump, and his power to confront the issues comes directly from us.
I am confident that ultimately “We The People” will win. How we can execute the solution is more challenging; in the interim, tactical civics and extreme federalism are doable right now, in this next 2024 election cycle.
It sucks that a UniParty congress extended FISA-702. However, even if the hail-Mary pass on Monday fails, FISA was still extended for only two-years.
Sundance, excellent aggregation of so many years of data points detailing the ‘what’ and ‘how’. A cooresponding article detailing the ‘why’ from your perspective would be fascinating. I’m assuming the subjugation of the US to the larger UN / NWO global governance is the goal?
The ability to get, retain and grow power is its own reason. Power rationalizes getting even more power.
Tier Two has been neutered in recent years with the state legislatures being taken over with ballot harvesting. For example, the Va legislature has gone far left due to cheating in local elections. In some districts you can’t find anyone who likes their representative or senator but they keep winning against very good candidates. Sen Warner lost the 2020 election until a large number of ballots came in late.
The machines.
Respectfully, no. The MACHINE, as in the Uniparty as it is applied to STATE government, is far more important, the tabulators etc. are just the tools, that facillitate the people using them, like a wrench or hammer.
Its those who are wielding the tools, that we need to address.
If we eliminate the tools, which will exhaust a lot of the energy our frustration/anger generates, and the same people are still in place, and the same system for putting those people in place remains, we will have accomplished nothing more consequential than rearranging the deck chairs on the titannic.
Gotta replace the Captain and crew, if we want to change coarse, and avoid the iceberg.
And the State Republican Party Executive Committee, are the ones installing the politicians we mistakenly focus our attention on.
Point taken, Dutch. I agree. In the meantime, NO voting machines.
Off topic…
“Its those who are wielding the tools, that we need to address.”
It is those who are firing the guns that we need to address.
The Blob
Bingo! Get rid of the voting machines!!!
Many warned against passage of the “Patriot Act” in 2001 because we saw clearly where it would lead. It didn’t take rocket science or special insights. Just an ability to put down fear of a current threat to see a much worse threat down the road that would emerge. That’s why many who saw that for what it was were also the first to see the CovID-2019 operation for what it was.
We saw every single larded up, dreamed up, wished for, laundry list, shopping spree policing tool imagined and desired by every law enforcement official in the history of man bundled up and packaged under the “Patriot Act” and enacted by Congress. Rights of citizens explicitly protected under the US Constitution that civil libertarians and minority policing reform advocates had previously resisted, all run over by the authoritarian state determined to “protect the homeland” as surely as the police and judicial system did in Germany when it turned against its citizens in the mid-1930’s.
All that has flowed from that reorientation and elimination of Constitutional protections has followed the same, predictable pattern as what happened in 1930’s Germany. With the same predictable – and predicted – results. With the “Patriot Act” now understood to have been named to describe its real enemies, not its protectorate. Patriots. We, The People. Patriots. Our government declared war on us in 2001. It’s taken over two decades for most readers of CTH to fully understand this, including this one.
Even though I was there raising the alarm at the Patriot Act back then, having worked to reform “civil forfeiture” laws that allow LEO to seize and dispose of any property they allege was or could be used by anyone merely accused of criminality. Without due process, claiming success at preventing crime in doing so. Directing proceeds from the seizures to increase their armory, throw raucous departmental “morale” parties, vacations, expensive gifts to friends, families, politically connected allies. Even having that experience with abusive policing pre-2001 to warrant my opposition to the Patriot Act at the time, even though I hearkened back to the known history of 1930’s Germany at the time, even possessing all of the natural skepticism of authority my soul was born with, I had no clue just how deep and wide, how pervasive and malevolent the Patriot Act would become.
I’m not sure I could’ve spoken, yelled and screamed any louder at the time into the ears of those I knew then, even many I knew in Congress, the Bush Administration and state government back then. As much as Sundance describes the blank looks on those he speaks to about the silos in DC today, the same expressions were on their faces nearly twenty years ago when trying to describe where it all would inevitably lead. They simply didn’t/don’t want to believe. Because they’re nearly all weak, corrupt, or complicit, or some combination therein. It won’t be current leaders who turn the tide that our collective fates ride atop its waves. It will be We, The People.
When the Berlin Wall came down, all those spook bureaucrats who’d been “fighting the Cold War” didn’t get laid off. They came home and figured out ways to spy on us. FEDGOV bureaucrats are employed for life. That needs to change.
Add in the pursuit of “hate crimes” laws, which many of us also decried, predicting accurately it would lead to hate speech being criminalised.
Many still applaud RICO laws, not tracing accurately the path from convicting Al Capone of Tax Evasion, to RICO, to Civil Forfeiture, or how the use of CI’s enabled LE to circumvent entrapment laws,…
“First them came for the Mafia, and I was not Mafia, and so said nothing,…
Then they came for the drug dealers, and I was not a drug dealer and so I said nothing,…
Then they came for the “Islamic extremists” and I was not one of them,…
Then they came for the J6 protesters/school board protesters/abortion clinic protesters,…MAGA
I get the idea, Dutchman, but Mafia, drug-dealers, and Islamic extremism are criminal acts. The Patriot Act has been extended to include prosecution of “inconvenient” persons, regardless of legality.
Read the story about Susan Lindauer: https://exploringrealhistory.blogspot.com/2018/02/part-1extreme-prejudicethe-terrifying.html
I can remember feeling like “I don’t want to live in a police state” when they passed that monstrosity & created the DHS. It just seemed like extreme overkill to me to keep us from easily buying Sudafed through the Patriot Act!
Deep State failures led to 9/11, which led to panic, which led to Deep State accruing much more power.
Deep State failures led to 2008 Financial Crisis, which led to panic, which led to Deep State accruing much more power.
Deep State failures led to Covid, which led to panic, which led to Deep State accruing much more power.
See how it works? Failure results in more tyranny and more power to the very people who caused the failure.
Panic is the fulcrum. The Deep State exploits panic to deepen their power.
Lesson is – DON’T PANIC. No matter what catastrophe is unfolding Do Not Panic.
Alternative theory for your consideration:
Deep state wanted to accrue much more power, which led to Operation 9/11, which led to panic, which led to Deep State accruing much more power.
Deep State wanted to accrue much more power, which led to Operation 2008 Financial Crisis, which led to panic, which led to Deep State accruing much more power.
Deep State wanted to accrue much more power, which led to Operation CovID-19, which led to panic, which led to Deep State accruing much more power.
Seems to me a more likely scenario. But that’s just me. Or is it?
I think your theory is the most likely, FF. The manipulation of social media can generate panic easily, and we’ve been subjected to an endless stream of propaganda since the radio days. Television was a more effective propaganda tool, and the interwebs are more effective still. Periodic panic waves allow a ratcheting effect from the Deep State to gain increasing amounts of power.
The demolition of the Twin Towers served to justify the Patriot Act. Both actions will live in disgrace for eternity.
I never dreamed that I’d trust the Russian government as much/more than our own, and I trust Putin more than Biden (not even close). That picture of Strozk looks like evil personified. Most of this activity is treasonous and deserves the appropriate punishment, whatever that may be.
I’ve thought about that, too. And see much the Russian government is doing with its people that I long for our government to return to, including protecting the family from the evil culture warriors and child predators. But I also am familiar enough with their information control system and even China’s information control system to know that they will gladly hold up the magnifying glass at our nation’s malgovernance, corruption, greed, insane and harmful public policies, defects that they themselves suffer from but don’t permit exposure of inside their own controlled information spheres. They know its destabilizing to an adversary, the US, there is much to gain to have us see our own government for the evil that it is. A divided house and all. While they conceal their own malgovernance from their own people because it would destabilize themselves.
And the US does the same. Once upon a time, the US would expose its malgovernance in order to correct it. Which was known to make us stronger, a better nation for it, resulting in better governance. Authoritarian, dictatorial, totalitarian governance is inherently weak and subject to destabilizing forces. When you air your dirty laundry out in public it loses its power to intimidate, control, corrupt. Sunshine being the best disinfectant and all. This government’s dirty laundry needs a big airing. How much of their own dirty laundry does Russia or China permit? Yes, we trust the Russian/Chinese governments to tell us about our dirty laundry more than our own government and captured agencies (which includes the media). But even their citizens know not to trust them about their own domestic dirty laundry.
What is crystal clear today is that our own government flat out hates us, tells us this, wants us dead and works very hard to kill us all slowly as they rob us..
I don’t think that the Russian government feels this way about it’s people, or is out to get them in way the US government is out to get us.
I’m coming to a place where I can understand how some people may feel safer in Russia than they do here in the US now.
This is the bottom line..
I hear you. I wonder the same. But it could just as easily be a “grass is greener” outlook. By all accounts even political refugees like Snowden would rather be back in the US if he could walk freely here with no larger target on him than is on the rest of us. For what it’s worth.
It appears to me that our government has been in the drug business since before the Vietnam War. Easy money, and lots of it for lots of people. Unless and until we, the people, can control what our government does, we are serfs. Democracy and Republic are meaningless terms until then.
The key to a solution is to eliminate the profit in a criminal enterprise, i.e., drugs, K-Street, insider trading, Section 230, Citizens United, etc.
Try this link: https://exploringrealhistory.blogspot.com/2018/04/part-2goodfellasthe-dark-tower-and.html
Had a few friends in the FBI during those years of
” transformation “. Many thought at the time the unqualified promotions, solid agent transfers, early retirements and reassignments had to do with just internal politics. Didn’t take them long to realize the entire agency was being transformed.
How many people know that, before he was cub reporter for the Washington Post, Bob Woodward was an intelligence officer for the U.S. Navy and worked at the Pentagon?
Knowing that while reading James Rosen’s “Bob Woodward’s Sins Of Omission” then what happened to Richard Nixon after he tried to shake things up at the Pentagon makes a lot more sense. Take a look for yourself:
https://www.commentary.org/articles/james-rosen/bob-woodwards-sins-omission/
Good article. Thanks for posting it. I must admit this confirms my suspicions. I just figured anytime Hollywood makes a “historical” movie and then gives it the little gold statue they are trying to rewrite history. As a film buff, I tried watching All the President’s Men long ago and couldn’t make it through 30 minutes of it. Set off my BS alarm and it was nothing more than artificially manufactured suspense.
Theres a few good ones that leak out.
“Air America” Mel Gibson, Robert Downey Jr. watch DVD, with Special Features, thats essential.
“The International” Clive Owen Naomi Watts, again must see the Special features.
“Vice” Chrisian Bale, Steve Carrel (in a serious role, he is great as Don Rumsfeld!).
“Charlie Wilsons War” Tom Hanks, Julia Roberts
“Argo” Ben Affleck, Alan Arkin
Dutchman you’ve reminded me that Hollyweird used to make some great movies.. what a loss it’s been that they all lost their minds and went nutty.
Great movies, Dutchman. I have all of them in my library and resolve to watch them again soon. Thank you.
You might like this book: https://exploringrealhistory.blogspot.com/2022/08/part-1-bond-of-secrecy-my-life-with-cia.html
We are all screwed
Thou Doometh.
The sky is falling.
A hard NO we are not screwed thay are screwed we will win in the end
TT – Why post this? Does your comment add anything at all to the discussion? If not, why share your gloom?
Unless of course, you are engaging in 5th generation warfare….
My wife and I like screwing. You don’t?
Awesome post. The fourth branch and it’s many government and private subsidiaries is basically a criminal cartel that operates under a cloak of legitimacy. Sundance’s illustration of the capitol (DC) with a massive root system comes to mind. It needs intense exposure to sunlight and a dose of Roundup.
A brave, talented, conservative screenwriter, not prone to suicide and with a large life insurance policy, should take this post and write a movie or documentary script with Sundance serving as chief script advisor. Actually it would probably have to be a docudrama series. It could be titled “As the Swamp Turns”. Surely Trump’s historic two terms deserves to be memorialized by the truth for all to see. Trump 2024 or bust!
It actually is a national crime syndicate. Don’t let the description of who these actors in the article fool you. They were stand-ins for the real national crime syndicate that existed then and has grown up and around us from.
https://www.nationalcrimesyndicate.com/apalachin-meeting
Very few crime family syndicates worse than the Bush’s:
“If you can control about three or four key elements you can totally control a state. You can make right, wrong. You can make truth, falsehood. Falsehood, truth. If you control the media, if you control the justice department, if you control the police. you own the system.”
– John DeCamp
From, Conspiracy Of Silence (Banned Discovery Channel Documentary)
https://archive.org/details/ConspiracyOfSilenceBannedDiscoveryChannelDocumentary
https://mindcontrolblackassassins.com/tag/larry-king/
https://spotlightonabuse.wordpress.com/2013/05/02/tim-tate-on-the-making-of-the-franklin-scandal-documentary-conspiracy-of-silence/
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/sep/25/usa.secondworldwar
Unholy Trinity: The Vatican, The Nazis, and the Swiss Banks
Sarasota Reading Festival, November 11, 2000
https://www.c-span.org/video/?160639-1/unholy-trinity-vatican-nazis-swiss-banks
(Bush, Dulles discussed from 20:44 – 34:44)
It’s all one big national and international crime family syndicate. Names many know. Names few know. The uncomfortable truth real world separated from the fictional world of comfortable lies.
Speaking of controlling the media:
There’s another item that could appear in Sundance’s exhaustively brilliant timeline above.
Obama got a law passed to allow state-controlled media to lie to Us the People at will. And they have duly (and daily) lied about almost everything since.
It was in 20212, and called the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/112th/house-bill/5736
I learned about this here at CTH from other Treepers. In my mind it’s the cement that hardens the facts Sundance presents above.
With a state-run propaganda media system, the growth of the fourth branch has been like a plant given a powerful fertilizer.
The more people understand about the mafia, the more they can see the government is a mafia..
Living near Boston, the land of Whitey Bulger, Bob Mueller’s FBI.. we get it all loud and clear.
Peter Strzok didn’t live in Massachusetts for the chowda ya know.
Breaking down the word govern-ment: Steer-mind. To be the guide of minds. A very important position. Who guides the minds of a community and nation is important. Criminals guiding the minds of a community and nation is dangerous for the upstanding and moral. They know they don’t belong there. And fear being discovered and losing their racket. So they vigorously protect their turf. With very few constraints. Namely, what can they get away with without the minds in the community/nation losing trust in their guides and turning on them? That. That’s what our unending objective must be. Helping minds lose trust in their criminal guides.
Thank you for the brilliant analysis. As an aside, from reading the above, it would appear that perhaps the Musk/Twitter situation is not the ‘free speech platform’ without government connections. Everything Musk does, AFAIK, has some government connection. I never went back to Twitter, and still do not wholly trust Musk.
But another question: I’ve always wondered why, if indeed what Bill Binney advised was true, as well as what we surmised was true, why Assange never came out and indicated who his source was. If, indeed, it was Seth Rich, he no longer needs any protection….unless it is somewhat else still alive? Is there some other reason that Assange would not finally indicate his source?
Thanks for organizing the facts. Democrats are card-carrying totalitarians. Now, I am thinking the Republicans are the same. I think we have evolved to precisely what reasonable persons predicted.
It is God and the People versus a government controlled by elite totalitarians. God and the people will be the victors. Now, it is only a matter of process as we move to victory.
Publish this document, Sundance, not just here but as a book and get it out to everyone in the biggest way possible. It beats every other political book printed in at least the last 5 years. Your research and connections are of Thomas Paine, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson and Abraham Lincoln in quality and in truth all rolled into one. I was never more serious in my life.
This is the best place to “print” it, and this material is why this is the most viewed blog, evah!
He keeps putting this material “out there” and each time it gets longer, with more added material, lol.
Its up to us to spread the links, and print it out and “pass it on”…
I hope all the content on this site is mirrored on multiple servers in multiple non-US jurisdictions.
I’d love to see a series or movies or documentaries on this subject.
Thank you Sundance for your yeoman’s work to reveal the nuts and bolts of how the IC apparatus has been constructed to subvert our government!
A much deeper dive will reveal WHY our government has been subverted, WHO benefits from the subversion, and WHEN the subversion actually began.
Simply put, the British Oligarchy never truly conceded defeat to Gen. Washington at the Battle of Yorktown on October 19, 1781, nor at the signing of the Paris Peace Treaty on September 3, 1783.
Today we are in the culmination of the British Oligarchy’s Fourth War on the USA that was plotted by Cecil Rhodes, activated by his death in 1902 and implementation of his Wills that resulted in the founding of the Rhodes Scholarship Program and Round Table Movement.
The Round Table Movement evolved into the British Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House) founded in 1919-20 and its U.S. subsidiary, the Council on Foreign Relations, founded in 1921. Hillary Clinton referred to the CFR as the “Mothership,” but that distinction more appropriately belongs to Chatham House.
The purpose for the creation of Chatham House and its subsidiary the CFR was, and is, to instigate the collapse of the USA and its reabsorption back under the British Commonwealth, and eventually under a future British One-World Global Empire.
Checkout this book by Matt Ehret:
Clash of the Two Americas, Volume 4:
The Anglo-Venetian Roots of the Deep State
https://a.co/d/4BTPcC5
Click on the “Read Sample” bar and read down through the Table of Contents and Introduction.
The Origins of the Deep State in North America Part I: The Round Table Movement
https://canadianpatriot.org/2022/01/27/origins-of-deep-state-part1/
New Revelations Shed Light on the British Roots of the Deep State
https://open.substack.com/pub/matthewehret/p/new-revelations-shed-light-on-the?r=1kb28q&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Sir Henry Kissinger: Midwife to New Babylon
https://open.substack.com/pub/matthewehret/p/sir-henry-kissinger-midwife-to-new?r=1kb28q&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Kissinger’s Adoration of the 1815 Congress of Vienna: A Master Key into Universal History
https://open.substack.com/pub/matthewehret/p/kissingers-adoration-of-the-1815-645?r=1kb28q&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Why the Anglo-American Special Relationship Must End
https://open.substack.com/pub/matthewehret/p/why-the-anglo-american-special-relationship?r=1kb28q&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
CSIS and the Round Table Origins of the Five Eyes
https://open.substack.com/pub/matthewehret/p/csis-and-the-round-table-origins?r=1kb28q&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Matt Ehret’s Insights:
https://matthewehret.substack.com/
The story of the Anglo-American Establishment was first revealed to the public by Prof. Carroll Quigley through his two books:
https://www.amazon.com/s?k=carroll+quigley&crid=D0QMHOVF5TT3&sprefix=Carroll%2Caps%2C142&ref=nb_sb_ss_ts-doa-p_5_7
Meet Carroll Quigley:
https://corbettreport.com/meet-carroll-quigley/
https://corbettreport.com/interview-1158-joe-plummer-teaches-tragedy-and-hope-101/
Tragedy & Hope 101
By Joe Plummer
https://www.joeplummer.com/
(Click on a book pic and scroll down to the Table of Contents)
The USA is controlled by the British Globalist Fascist Oligarchy.
US Foreign Policy is dictated by the British Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House) through its U.S. subsidiary, the Council on Foreign Relations. US Monetary Policy is dictated by the British-controlled Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland through its US subsidiary, the Federal Reserve. And US National Security is dictated by the British-controlled “Five Eyes” intelligence network (UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and USA).
The FBI/MI5 and CIA/MI6 and NSA/GCHQ weren’t created to protect the citizens of the USA and subjects of the U.K., but to protect the wealth, interests, and NWO agenda of the British Globalist Fascist Oligarchy.
How Cecil Rhodes Fathered the Modern Globalist Movement: a Timeline
https://stovouno.org/2019/02/21/how-cecil-rhodes-fathered-the-modern-globalist-movement-timeline/
The Origins of the Deep State in North America
Part I: The Round Table Movement
https://canadianpatriot.org/2022/01/27/origins-of-deep-state-part1/
The British Oligarchy’s Fourth War on America is not being fought with bullets and bayonets, but with filth and anarchy to instigate “The Great Collapse of US Society” so “We Their Serfs” will surrender our Liberty & Rights, abolish our Constitution, and allow them to “Build Back Better” a One-World NWO where the British Oligarchy own all of the land and natural resources, and we must obey the bureaucratic technocrats at the UN-WEF-WHO-BIS-NATO and their “Sustainable Development Goals” and “Environmental, Social, Governance” and “Diversity, Equity, Inclusion” dictates.
The following almost sounds like a script of every day’s evening news, and that’s because it is the playbook of the British Oligarchy’s Fourth War on America, but this war is being fought with filth and anarchy, not bullets and bayonets:
How To Instigate “The Great Collapse of US Society” By Implementing the Frankfurt School’s “Critical Theory.”
Divide and Conquer.
The oppressed and their oppressors.
1. The creation of racism offenses.
2. Continual change to create confusion.
3. The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children.
4. The undermining of schools’ and teachers’ authority.
5. Huge immigration to destroy identity.
6. The promotion of excessive drinking/drug abuse.
7. Emptying of churches.
8. An unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime.
9. Dependency on the state or state benefits.
10. Control and dumbing down of media.
11. Encouraging the breakdown of the family.
Exploitation of the differences between the sexes, the overthrowing of traditional relationships between men and women:
• attack the authority of the father, deny the specific roles of father and mother, and wrest away from families their rights as primary educators of their children.
• abolish differences in the education of boys and girls
• abolish all forms of male dominance – hence the presence of women in the armed forces
• declare women to be an ‘oppressed class’ and men as ‘oppressors.’
THE BRITISH OLIGARCHY’S FOURTH WAR ON AMERICA.
https://open.substack.com/pub/william3n4z2/p/the-british-oligarchys-fourth-war?r=1kb28q&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
THE SECRET PLOT IN 1909 BY THE ANGLO-AMERICAN PILGRIMS SOCIETY TO STAFF SPY AGENCIES WITH NEWSPAPERMEN.
The Pilgrim Society’s Empire Press Union created MI5, MI6 and GC&CS, now GCHQ in 1909.
All the leading British and American newspapers were weaponized in 1909 by the British Government-led Pilgrims Society: Daily Telegraph, Daily Mail, Times, Daily Mirror, Daily Express, Sunday Times, Observer, Financial Times, Washington Post, New York Times, Chicago Tribune, Boston Globe, etc.
As radio and television emerged in the 1920s, the list of Pilgrim-weaponized intelligence propaganda media expanded to BBC, NBC, CBS, ABC, MSNBC, CBC, CNN, CNBC, Comcast and now FOX.
The C.I.A., FBI, NSA and State Department are the step-children under Pilgrims Society (British) control today.
https://aim4truth.org/2019/09/13/origins-of-fake-news/
The Anglo-American Pilgrims Society (1902).
https://open.substack.com/pub/william3n4z2/p/the-anglo-american-pilgrims-society?r=1kb28q&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
https://william3n4z2.substack.com/archive?sort=new
Unbelievable recap to ALL that has gone on. Could a Constitutional Article V Convention of States be a tactic for the states to take to reign in the money funding this Federal bureaucracy? Term limits etc…
Americans see problems but need some specific tactical direction on what to do about this besides vote?
No. Who do you think would be delegates to said convention? They would necessarily need to be appointed by state leaders. Do you believe state leaders would appoint you? Patriots? MAGA? The same leaders and powerful interests responsible for tearing up the existing Constitution would help draft a new constitution that gives us, We, The People, more rights and power than the original one they shredded? By appointing Americans currently targeted as domestic enemies as delegates to said convention?
That’s a pyrite solution. Fool’s gold. Seeking to constitutionally authorize that which they’ve already begun to do and will continue to do that’s a clear violation of the original. Don’t be fooled by pyrite “solutions.”
No to the ConConCon.
More rules wouldn’t affect those that don’t follow rules.
Additionally, the ConConCon is a Con, did I mention it’s a Con?
The Founders actually violated their charter when they created an entire new Constitution rather than follow through on their commitment to merely modify the Articles of Confederation, and those men afterwards said that they shuddered to imagine another Constitutional Convention convened for even the slightest of reasons, they knew that it would likely result in the utter eradication of our Constitution, and they were correct.
At this very moment there are several Communist Constitutions waiting in the wings for the ConConCon Crew to corral Americans desperate to save their nation into another Convention from which Liberty would not emerge, though one can be assured that the one hundred page document that emerges would be composed of flowery virtuous new age prose.
We do not have men of the stature of our Founders, we’d be much worse off, and it is a literal trap that would be the complete dissolution of our nation.
So no, such a thing would not reign in the government, it would enthrone the worst possible tyranny imaginable.
I con . . . . cur!
1947 CIA, Allen Dulles right out of the gate, Operation Mockingbird control of the (enemy) media, the tell-a-vision our brains have been filled with goo ever sinse.
Note: This was one of Truman’s big regrets.
Everything from that point on has been manipulated glo-bull-ist hooey. Look at events today, Iran fires missiles into Israel, Dulles oversaw the 1953 Iranian coup d’état. Everything is a cyclical mush that repeats over and over again leading us to today.
Things like JFK’s EO 10988 (allowing federal employees to unionize) DARPA 1958 (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency), SES 1977 (Senior Executive Service), buoyed by the Patriot Act now have carte blanche, to do whatever they please.
Our Government state & federal is a captured operation, 110+ years in the making, the tools are just more advanced and with “the one they’ve been waiting for” Sleazy Barry’O and Big Mike whose hate for the USA is legendary.
Once again, I believe that our “commonality” will beat even this monster. Gathering information, issuing dictates and nobody cares. The consent of the governed has been rebuked, now it’s our turn.
Ultra-MAGA!
God Bless “Real” and Free America! To hell with these demons.
What is stopping the evil RINO’s and Dem’s from impeaching Trump very early in his ’47’ presidency?
They make their own rules, so they can create an excuse and vote to impeach.
There used to be 1 useful patriot on the Gang of 8. Now there are none since Rep. Nunes left congress. His replacement is a disaster.
If they target one wing of the UniParty, does it mean the big bird will soon crash to the ground?
How can it fly without the appearance of “flight” and a gaping missing wing?
I call this good news disguised as bad news… in the long term, that is.
Both wings are corrupt.
Both serve the same master.
Both exploit different segments of the population to perpetuate their grift and their schemes.
re: ISR , you missed the fact that they were in every US Bell telephone company – physically in their office – with access to most likely all US calls prior to the rise of social media and other surveillance. The paragraph is awfully short and doesn’t fully reflect their scope or capabilities.
Well, if you want to go back even further, the USPS was established to spy on communication between Americans as soon as the ink on the US Constitution was dry. Came in handy during the Civil War. This Wiki history (I know, I know) even admits the USPS worked with intelligence agencies during the Cold War…”to design patriotic stamps” it says. Yeah. Sure. And everything else unsaid. Before and since.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Postal_Service
Same song. Different technology. Just go back to sleep and pretend it’s not there. Let the blue blood super smert people handle the tough job of governing, you serfs, human chattel.
This Lawfare will continue until Democrats are targeted. Then, legislation will put a stop to all nonsense.
There’s a lot to unpack here, but I think Sundance skims over a key issue – the idealogy of those hired.
Where are the Whistleblowers?
1. Shipwreckedcrew – former career DOJ attorney now representing multiple J6 defendants – says the FBI *used* to recruit from the military, which skews Conservative.
The FBI now recruits on college campuses – Liberal.
2. DOJ changes. Eric Holder started hiring from ideologically Left and Far Left organizations. Non idealogically aligned individuals got grunt work. Liberals hire Liberals.
Shipwreckedcrew saw the writing on the wall, and left, as did many others.
(SWC and Sundance have locked horns a few times, but they both have good intentions.)
These individuals are all politically aligned.
And all are controlled by the IC, just as SD throughly explained with yet another post.
James Clapper was installed as DNI because he is “a person uniquely suited to being an idiot.” Biden was installed for the exact same reason. Schumer was installed for the exact same reason. Various Speakers of the House were installed for the exact same reason. Chief Justice Roberts was installed for the exact same reason. All stooges. All fall-guys and figureheads kept in the dark and if necessary they become who gets to take the blame. They get to pump up their huge egos thinking they have power but they are just tools of the hidden hands.
Fetterman appears to be the poster boy for this trend.
But I do enjoy it when his installed software sputters, and he says things like calling out the border-jumper squatters.
Seems to me he gives the handlers some bad moments…
i remember when trump was inaugurated and the deep state started coming for him. sundance laid this all out. i thought then that the truth would come out .it didn’t. the point when he went to D.C. and brought us awake to the beast behind the scenes was a real let down for me and a couple friends. now this corruption is being spoke about all over. trump lay’s it out every chance he get’s. and people are aware. and there are no denials . none that amount to anything. a former marine friend said when he saw the chick-fil-a scene where the girl was hugging trump ,it brought a smile to his face. it would appear that if the deep state decides to do something stupid to stay in power,the american people may have a reaction they won’t defeat. just thoughts.
“Much of America is convinced the 2020 election was fair because rigging an election seemed so far out of the zone of expected behavior from our government.
But after the Twitter Files, Russian Collusion Hoax, Laptop Hoax, Fine People Hoax, Jan6th Insurrection Hoax, fake BLM and Antifa movements, Fake News, and now the Brazil “backdoor play” to take down Musk have expanded that “zone of expected behavior” from our government.
And don’t get me started about Ukraine.
In 2024, you’d have to be embarrassingly uninformed and/or a huge idiot to believe 2020 was decided by voters. A fair election in America is now squarely outside the “zone of expected behavior” from my government.”
I suspect that the Deep State is already working furiously to insulate themselves in their newfound power structure. I don’t see how we catch up with what they are doing, even if we can figure out what they have already done. Microchip technology is quickly advancing into areas where the Deep State was up against a conundrum of barriers. And the financing of these advances is coming directly from the treasury department when actions become necessary for the Deep State.
I believe the ultimate control weaponry will be used to control We The People and We are the only remaining power that can ever restore the Constitutional system. A tall order for a people who are now several generations into the brainwashing projects of all authoritarian governments. Trump is all we have because We The People are mostly just lemmings at this point. We are a long way from the ideals of our revolutionary founders.
Sundance, this analysis of events is the basis and foundation for a textbook that will be used by PhD candidates for decades. Absolutely outstanding. Thank you.
You didn’t need to do the deep dive to come to the same conclusion that Lord Acton came to many years ago:
“Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely.”
Classic Sundance. A concise explanation of why we are in this mess.
The Nunes HPSCI were “good guys”… however now I think HPSCI is as corrupt as SSCI.
P.S. Looks like the warrant requirement for domestic surveillance went bye-bye, thanks to our wonderful and thoughtful God-fearing Speaker of the House. Thanks Mike.
I thought I’d share this video with this thread as it bears directly on what Sundance is laying out, in particular the corruption WITHIN the IC and how it got that way. (Note 28:53)
This is a first hand account and worth the time IMO.
From Eisenhower’s Farewell Address, 1961:
“Throughout America’s adventure in free government, our basic purposes have been to keep the peace; to foster progress in human achievement, and to enhance liberty, dignity and integrity among people and among nations. To strive for less would be unworthy of a free and religious people. Any failure traceable to arrogance, or our lack of comprehension or readiness to sacrifice would inflict upon us grievous hurt both at home and abroad.
Progress toward these noble goals is persistently threatened by the conflict now engulfing the world. It commands our whole attention, absorbs our very beings. We face a hostile ideology-global in scope, atheistic in character, ruthless in purpose, and insidious in method. Unhappily the danger it poses promises to be of indefinite duration. To meet it successfully, there is called for, not so much the emotional and transitory sacrifices of crisis, but rather those which enable us to carry forward steadily, surely, and without complaint the burdens of a prolonged and complex struggle-with liberty at stake. Only thus shall we remain, despite every provocation, on our charted course toward permanent peace and human betterment.”
“Doofus Reminder” video isn’t available anymore, FYI.
The 17th Amendment was always a bad and corrupt idea and has left The States with no one to represent their interests in Washington, DC – and now the Senators represent the permanent state and their personal investment accounts.
Thank you, Sundance.
I’m dirt poor, but if I ever get enough nickels to rub together, I’m going to remember this first.
I have been lurking here for a few years and this is my first post.
Even though there is not any new information here, I want to thank Sundance for putting it together so succinctly.
I first started becoming aware of the Uniparty early in the Obama administration. I wondered why it seemed like a continuation of the Bush administration. If I listened to what the politicians were saying it seemed like they were diametrically opposed. However, if I watched what they were doing, it was the same. For example, the TARP program. Also, Obama campaigned on eliminating the Patriot Act, but reauthorized it.
That led me to question who was really in charge. Why was a liberal Democrat following the same agenda as a conservative Republican? Obviously the POTUS was not really in charge.
I appreciate Sundance’s articulation of the silo system in the U.S. government. However, it appears to be much larger. How can other governments, the U.N., the WHO, the WEF, financial institutions, the media and others have the same agenda?
That leads to the $64,000 question that I haven’t been able to answer. WHO IS REALLY IN CHARGE? Who is directing these institutions, these silos? I don’t believe as David Icke says that they are reptilian aliens. Nor can I blame Satan. What human or group of humans are in charge?
I suspect that it might be Nazism, that in WWII Germany was defeated, but Nazism survived. There are also the Jacobins. I don’t know but would like some answers. Who is at the head of this snake?
Forgive me for the long post. God bless.
Fire up the printers and then the copiers and then disseminate the material far and wide. Drop it off at every convenience store, every restaurant, every bus stop, every coffee shop, every park……EVERYWHERE!
They can’t delete that shit. Who cares if only 30% of it gets read and 15% start looking into it more closely.
Not all people but some are curious and getting curiouser. Let them see the truth about our corrupt injustice system.
As far as the alphabet agencies are concerned here’s my view.
“In their eyes there’s something lacking…..what they need’s a damn good whacking”- George Harrison.
Disclaimer: This is for all those in “law enforcement” who tow the line, NOT those that gave up everything to fight the system, especially during the plandemic.
Tier 1… Tier 2… I live in Massachusetts. We’re screwed here.
I think Obama-Holder inherited a Deep State. I got targeted back in mid 1980’s. A dork boob contractor performed sneak and peak and actually stole my keys for awhile so he could make copies for later use. Gang Stalking is what DOJ calls Community Policing. It gives police powers to weirdos, dorks, bored losers, voyeurs and frustrated jack asses. It’s a supervised vigilante program that operates to maximize extrajudicial punishment along the spectrum from esoteric to the profane. It’s been going for decades. The real story isn’t predicated on all the facts from all sources.