It is not my intention to provide black pills. However, we discuss events through the prism of what exists, what we can see and track, rather than what we pretend might be in place.  Thus, today CTH fires a signal flare drawing attention away from precinct voting polling places, and toward tabulation centers.

There is some alarming evidence beginning to surface pointing toward a shift in the USA election process, specifically the fundamentally changed process that now exists behind absentee balloting.

The events in California for the 2018 midterm election appeared to be the original BETA test of mass mail-in ballot collection.  Every person in the state mailed a ballot for completion in the 2018 election cycle.  The outcome was evident for two weeks after election day when ballots continuing to arrive changed the vote outcome.

The 2020 general election then saw, thanks to COVID-19, a nationwide rollout of the BETA test: balloting 2.0.  Millions of households receiving ballots from state election officials, so the socially distant electorate did not need to assemble and vote on election day.  The process created a widespread opportunity for fraud.

In the 2022 midterm election, this absentee balloting system was still in place; affirmed into a new structural process within each state.  An awakening electorate pondered the absence of the predicted “red wave” and recognized there was a distinct difference between voters and ballots.  In general, the republicans were still focused on voters, but the democrats were focused on ballot submission processes.  2022 was essentially the third iteration from the originating California BETA test: balloting 3.0.

After 2022, playing catchup, nationwide attention shifted away from votes and election day, and people started talking about the importance of ballot distribution, collection and submission.  This has been the messaging system going into election day 2024.  However, there are strong, evidence-based reasons to believe ‘Balloting 4.0’ is something else entirely.  Election integrity officials could very well be focusing their efforts on polling and balloting processes that have moved far beyond where they were even just two short years ago.

(more…)

This is the little-known story behind the 2024 election. It will become a bigger story as the awakening continues.

This is the modification from the 2020 “mail in ballot” issue that perpetrated the original fraud.  Much like the shift in 2020, this is the subtle revision of operations that was planned in the background over the past few years when no one was paying attention.  This is also where I, long ago, put my focus, research and proactive actions to intercept.  Localized, fraudulent, ballot printing.

What we witness now in these emerging stories {Here} {Here} {Here} and {HERE} is an outcome of this activity.  This report below is yet another one; and yes, it’s almost everywhere.

HUERFANO COUNTY, Colo. (KRDO) – Multiple Colorado counties, including two in Southern Colorado, are experiencing issues with ballots not scanning.

KRDO13 has confirmed that ballots from a vendor called Fort Orange Press are unscannable. Las Animas and Huerfano Counties both used Fort Orange Press, as did Moffat County in the northwest corner of the state. The unscannable ballots were not issued to every voter in these counties.

(more…)

There is a lot of conflicting information about a recent 5th Circuit Court of Appeals (5th CCA) ruling that remands a lower court opinion back to the State of Mississippi.  You can read the 5th CCA RULING HERE.

The appellate judges stated that “Election Day,” as designated by Congress, is the last day ballots can be received by state officials. “Text, precedent, and historical practice confirm this ‘day for the election’ is the day by which ballots must be both cast by voters and received by state officials,” the court wrote, adding that Mississippi’s policy allowing ballots to arrive up to five days later is in conflict with federal law.

[Source pdf]

While the 5th CCA has jurisdiction over Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas, the decision only impacts Mississippi should the federal district court judge agree to bar the state from counting late-arriving mail-in ballots.  Yes, it is a win for Mississippi election integrity, but -no- it is unlikely to have a major impact on the overall election.

The ruling only applies to Mississippi, and the decision simply reverses the previous ruling and remands the issue back to the judge.  I hope that helps clear up any confusion.

(more…)

I’m not exactly sure what is going on here. When the private conversation between President Donald Trump and Robert F Kennedy Jr was recorded and leaked to the media, it was former CIA officer Amaryllis Fox Kennedy at the center of it. Additionally, this is Robert F Kennedy Jr’s daughter in law; she is married to his son.

As outlined by Tucker Carlson, “when Amaryllis Fox Kennedy says the intel agencies are a threat to our country, she’s not guessing. She spent ten years as a CIA officer before running Bobby Kennedy Jr.’s presidential campaign. She’s now campaigning for Trump.”  Forgive me, but Suspicious Cat remains, well, suspicious and on maximum alert.

First Reaction: When combined with the IC walk-back of opposition to Trump, via the Washington Post non-endorsement of Kamala, could this be those moments we previously predicted about the deepest elements of the Deep State going into hunker down mode – planning to just outlast a predictable POTUS Trump victory?

I do agree with Amaryllis Fox Kennedy about the profound shift in U.S government activity that happened after the Patriot Act was passed.  When I first heard political officials talking about the importance of “continuity of government,” I immediately recognized what they were describing was a construct of government that would exist and maintain without elected representatives of We The People.

The intelligence gathering and homeland security system, put into place after the Patriot Act was passed, is a bureaucratic administrative state without the presence of elected officials controlling the apparatus.  How can a constitutional republic function without elected officials in control of it?  That question is at the heart of our current situation.   That question is also at the epicenter of this “new American democracy” that no one seems to understand.

CHAPTERS:

(0:00) The Ukraine War Scam
(9:50) Why Washington Doesn’t Care About Domestic Policy
(14:13) Intel Agencies Operating Within the Media

(more…)

This afternoon, President Donald Trump will hold a Believers and Ballots Faith Town Hall with Georgia Lt. Governor Burt Jones in Zebulon, Georgia. His remarks are scheduled to begin at 3:00 pm EDT. Livestream links below.

RSBN YouTube Livestream Link – RSBN Rumble Livestream Link

.

(more…)

The FCC is investigating CBS for blatant manipulation of news. [SEE COMPLAINT HERE] CBS really has no defense.

CBS has been caught producing, via editorial manipulation, two entirely different responses to the same question.

Everyone has been asking CBS to just simply release the full transcript.  CBS has refused.  The assumption is now about the manipulative content of the broadcast being so extreme that to release a transcript would be even worse than what is already known.  The FCC complaint is simple and accurate, which is likely why CBS has never attempted to defend itself, until today.

CBS – Former President Donald Trump is accusing 60 Minutes of deceitful editing of our Oct. 7 interview with Vice President Kamala Harris. That is false.

60 Minutes gave an excerpt of our interview to Face the Nation that used a longer section of her answer than that on 60 Minutes. Same question. Same answer. But a different portion of the response. When we edit any interview, whether a politician, an athlete, or movie star, we strive to be clear, accurate and on point. The portion of her answer on 60 Minutes was more succinct, which allows time for other subjects in a wide ranging 21-minute-long segment. (Statement Link)

It is likely CBS will, eventually, release the full transcript. However, not until after the election. It is remarkable how CBS is willing to destroy any semblance of brand image that may have been left; but that position is merely just a reflection of our 2024 political situation.

(more…)

When you consider the probability that both govt and private sector are generating ballots, then you evaluate ballot centric issues accordingly.  County level ballots from two different feeder sources can present a problem at the scanning and tabulation stage, if there is any variance to them.

South Carolina – Berkeley County issued a statement Wednesday, Oct. 16, announcing certain voters are receiving duplicate absentee ballots. The announcement included that the county’s Department of Elections and Voter Registration is in contact with the state election commission about the incidents.

[…] “There were 246 absentee voters that were affected and did receive two ballots from the vendor that we use,” said Berkeley County elections director Rosie Brown. “I spoke to the state election commission, and they said there was a clerical error. But, doing our processes, all of our numbers matched, so I am not understanding the clerical error.” (link)

If you understand the lead-in paragraph, then you understand the “clerical error” perfectly.

(more…)

There is a lot going on behind the scenes in the final weeks.  Most political observers are now keenly aware of the difference between “ballots” and “votes” as they pertain to key counties:  Fulton County, Georgia; Wayne County, Michigan; Philadelphia and Allegany counties, Pennsylvania; Clark County, Nevada; Milwaukee and Marquette counties, Wisconsin, and Maricopa County, Arizona.

These are the specific counties and cities (Philadelphia, Atlanta, Milwaukee, Detroit) where the process of mass-mail/distribution of ballots, in combination with the assembly/harvesting therein, meets the process of “ballot scanning” at county level tabulation centers.  However, there’s another facet, “ballot making.”

Many people, including Robert F Kennedy Jr himself and his legal team in court filings, have presented the 2024 situation and asked a question. Essentially:

Why did the DNC apparatus sue to keep RFK JR’s name off certain state ballots and simultaneously sue to keep him on certain state ballots?

It just didn’t make sense….

… Until now.

(more…)

In this interview Tucker Carlson talks with Mark Halprin, a well-connected journalist that Tucker Carlson cites as the epicenter of all political power and journalistic knowledge since the mid-1980’s. Accordingly, the magnanimous and enlightened Mark Halprin knows more about the institutions of electoral influence, political power structures, people and organizations of political influence than most journalists, so sayeth Carlson.  And so, their discussion follows along.

If you are nostalgic for the time before you saw the strings on the political marionettes, and/or you like to remind yourself how you viewed politics in the era long before elections were decided by ballots instead of voters, you will enjoy this satiating conversation of how things used to be.

Both Halprin and Carlson pretend things are just like they were, while they apply 1998 political insight to the 2024 election year, and -for some reason- people discuss it.

However, if you have stopped pretending and you understand that modern political outcomes are determined by ballot systems, local ballot printing, fraudulent voter rolls to give the illusion of attribution to the locally printed ballots, and tabulation centers that conduct the necessary scanning of unattributed ballots to a number needed to generate the outcome, then this food-filled discussion about political sides between Halprin and Carlson ends up leaving you somewhat hungry.

Here’s an example.  Within the interview Mark Halprin notes that Kamala Harris campaign has raised over a billion dollars, and that’s just the money from inside the campaign; there’s much more from “outside groups and interests.”  With jaw-agape Carlson curiously asks where that money came from?  Halprin replies, “I have no idea,” and they simply move along.

(more…)

The Georgia state election rule is simple. Remove the paper ballots from the containers after voting and hand count the number of paper ballots. The number of paper ballots must match the number of electronically recorded votes and voters. If it does not there is a problem.  This rule also starts a paper trail putting the physical number of ballots on the record before they reach the Fulton County ballot scanning tabulation center.

It is a simple rule that says the number of ballots must match the number of voters. Easy peasy. The purpose of the rule is simple, make sure ballots are not double counted or scanned multiple times at the tabulation center. However, citing electoral anxiety, January 6th, and the lack of training poll workers on how to count numbers, a Fulton County judge has blocked the hand count. Apparently counting the number of physical papers is too difficult for Fulton County poll workers…. or, there is something else in play.

You can read the ridiculous judicial ruling HERE.

[SOURCE pdf]

You can read about Judge Robert McBurney HERE.  Let me be very clear without pretense…..  The Fulton County corrupt ballot system is dependent on scanning ballots multiple times.  This is what they did in 2020; this is why duplicate ballots were found in scanned ballot imaging and this is what they planned to do in 2024.  Run the Kamala Harris ballots multiple times to manufacture additional Harris votes.

Judge Robert McBurney is intentionally, with malicious intent, blocking the simple verification process that would have stopped the corrupt AME poll workers from scanning batches of ballots multiple times.  Judge Robert McBurney is facilitating the intent of ballot fraud. Fullstop.

(more…)