Using his Twitter/X platform to promote the 5-minute-long teaser, Tucker Carlson has finally released the interview with Julian Assange that took place on November 2, 2023. Why wait 51 days? Your guess is as good as mine. {Direct Rumble Link Here}
.
Within the prologue, and after interviewing Julian Assange, Tucker Carlson references the extremely important DNC email issue and states unequivocally, “democrats claim the emails had been hacked by the Russian government. But they hadn’t been, that was a lie. The emails had been leaked from within the DNC itself, almost certainly by a disgruntled employee.” WATCH:
It is an exceptionally good teaser, and the only way to see the full Julian Assange interview is through THIS LINK (TuckerCarlson.com).
A WALK IN THE VERY DEEP WEEDS….
The Weissmann/Mueller report contains claims that Russia hacked the DNC servers as the central element to the Russia interference narrative in the U.S. election. This DNC hack claim is the fulcrum issue structurally underpinning the Russian election interference narrative pushed by the Weissmann and Muller Special Counsel. However, this essential claim is directly disputed by WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, as outlined during a Dana Rohrabacher interview and by Julian Assange’s own on-the-record statements.
Assange was arrested at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London immediately after the Weissmann/Muller report was released to Bill Barr. Despite investigating the background of the Trump-Russia nonsense, John Durham never touched the DNC hacking claim – the core of the Mueller report. Why? Because Durham knew the U.S. Government threw a bag over Assange to protect the fraudulent Trump-Russia and Russian interference claims.
Again, this reality speaks to the corruption within the John Durham investigation. Durham was protecting Weissmann, Mueller and the core of their justification for a 2-year investigation. Durham knows why Assange was arrested. Durham stayed away from it, intentionally.
The Russians HAD TO have made efforts to interfere in the election, or else the factual basis for the surveillance operation against candidate Donald Trump is naked to the world.
That’s why so much DOJ, FBI and Mueller special counsel energy was exhausted framing the predicate.
“Seventeen intelligence agencies,” the December 29th Joint Analysis Report, the expulsion of the Russian diplomats which was an outcropping of the JAR, the rushed January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment, shoving microphones in everyone’s faces and demanding they answer if they believed Russia interfered – all of it, and I do mean every bit of it, is predicated on an absolute DC need to establish that Russia Attempted to Interfere in the 2016 election.
The “Russian Malicious Cyber Activity – Joint Analysis Report” (full pdf) is pure nonsense. It outlines nothing more than vague and disingenuous typical hacking activity that is no more substantive than any other hacking report on any other foreign actor. However, it was needed to help frame the Russian interference narrative.
There were no Russian diplomats involved; there was no Russian election interference; there was no Russian hacking of the DNC; it was all a fraud created by the intelligence community (IC), FBI and Main Justice to support Hillary Clinton’s lies and then cover their own targeting tracks.
On September 26, 2021, Yahoo News published an extensive article about the CIA targeting WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange in 2017 and the extreme conversations that were taking place at the highest levels of the U.S. government about how to control him.
There is a much bigger story transparently obvious when overlapped with CTH research files on the Mueller investigation and the U.S. intelligence community. Specifically, the motive intentionally not outlined by Yahoo News.
What I am going to share is a deep dive using the resources and timeline from within that Yahoo article and the specific details we have assembled that paints a clear picture about what interests existed for the Deep State, the Intelligence apparatus and the Mueller-Weissmann special counsel.
This fully cited review is not for the faint of heart. This is a journey that could shock many; it could alarm more and will likely force more than a few to reevaluate just what the purpose was for Mike Pompeo within the Donald Trump administration.
As the Yahoo News article begins, they outline how those within the Trump administration viewed Assange as a risk in 2017.
Here it is critical to accept that many people inside the Trump administration were there to control events, not to facilitate a policy agenda from a political outsider. In the example of Assange, the information he carried was a risk to those who attempted and failed to stop Trump from winning the 2016 election.
Julian Assange was not a threat to Donald Trump, but he was a threat to those who attempted to stop Donald Trump. In 2017, the DC system was reacting to a presidency they did not control. As an outcome, the Office of the President was being managed and influenced by some with ulterior motives.
Yahoo, via Michael Isikoff, puts it this way: “Some senior officials inside the CIA and the Trump administration even discussed killing Assange, going so far as to request “sketches” or “options” for how to assassinate him. Discussions over kidnapping or killing Assange occurred “at the highest levels” of the Trump administration, said a former senior counterintelligence official. “There seemed to be no boundaries.”
As we overlay the timeline, it is prudent to pause and remember some hindsight details. According to reports in November of 2019, U.S. Attorney John Durham and U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr were spending time looking carefully at CIA activity in the 2016 presidential election. One quote from a media-voice increasingly sympathetic to a political deep-state noted:
“One British official with knowledge of Barr’s wish list presented to London commented that, “It is like nothing we have come across before, they are basically asking, in quite robust terms, for help in doing a hatchet job on their own intelligence services”“. (Link)
It is interesting that quote came from a British intelligence official, as there was extensive pre-2016 election evidence of an FBI/CIA counterintelligence operation that also involved U.K. intelligence services. There was an aspect to the FBI/CIA operation that overlaps with both a U.S. and U.K. need to keep Wikileaks founder Julian Assange under tight control.
To understand the risk that Julian Assange represented to FBI/CIA interests, and effectively the Mueller special counsel, it is important to understand just how extensive the operations of the FBI/CIA were in 2016. It is within this network of foreign and domestic operations where FBI Agent Peter Strzok was clearly working as a bridge between the CIA and FBI operations.
By now, people are familiar with the construct of CIA operations involving Joseph Mifsud, a Maltese professor generally identified as a western intelligence operative who was tasked by the FBI/CIA to run an operation against Trump campaign official George Papadopoulos in both Italy (Rome) and London. {Go Deep} John Durham ignored him.
In a similar fashion, the FBI tasked U.S. intelligence asset Stefan Halper to target another Trump campaign official, Carter Page. Under the auspices of being a Cambridge Professor, Stefan Halper also targeted General Michael Flynn. Additionally, using assistance from a female FBI agent, under the false name Azra Turk, Halper also targeted Papadopoulos. Again, John Durham ignored it.
The initial operations to target Flynn, Papadopoulos and Page were all based overseas. This seemingly makes the CIA exploitation of the assets and the targets legal and much easier. If Durham went into this intelligence rabbit hole, there would be a paper trail that leads back to Robert Mueller. Durham didn’t go there.
John Durham and IG Michael Horowitz both outlined how very specific exculpatory evidence was known to the FBI and Main Justice, yet that evidence was withheld from the FISA application used against Carter Page and/or it was ignored. The FBI fabricated information in the FISA and removed evidence that Carter Page was previously working for the CIA. This is what FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith was indicted and convicted for doing.
One week after the FBI and DOJ filed the second renewal for the Carter Page FISA [April 7, 2017], Yahoo News notes how Mike Pompeo delivered his first remarks as CIA Director:
[…] On April 13, 2017, wearing a U.S. flag pin on the left lapel of his dark gray suit, Pompeo strode to the podium at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), a Washington think tank, to deliver to a standing-room-only crowd his first public remarks as Trump’s CIA director.
Rather than use the platform to give an overview of global challenges or to lay out any bureaucratic changes he was planning to make at the agency, Pompeo devoted much of his speech to the threat posed by WikiLeaks. (link)
Why would CIA Director Mike Pompeo be so concerned about Julian Assange and Wikileaks in April 2017?
In April of 2017 Pompeo’s boss, President Donald Trump, was under assault from the intelligence community writ large, and every deep state actor was leaking to the media in a frenzied effort to continue the Trump-Russia collusion conspiracy.
The Trump-Russia effort was so all consuming that FBI Director James Comey was even keeping a diary of engagement with President Trump in order to support an ongoing investigation built on fraud – yet, Mike Pompeo is worried about Julian Assange.
Again, here it is important to put yourself back into the time of reference. Remember, it’s clear in the text messages between FBI Agent Strzok and Lisa Page that Peter Strzok had a working relationship with what he called their “sister agency”, the CIA.
♦ Former CIA Director John Brennan admitted Peter Strzok helped write the January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) which outlines the Russia narrative; and it was also Peter Strzok who authored the July 31st, 2016, “Electronic Communication” from the CIA to the FBI that originated FBI operation “Crossfire Hurricane.” Strzok immediately used that EC to travel to London to debrief intelligence officials around Australian Ambassador to the U.K. Alexander Downer.
In short, Peter Strzok was a profoundly overzealous James Bond wannabe who acted as a bridge between the CIA and the FBI. The perfect type of FBI career agent for 2016’s CIA Director John Brennan to utilize.
Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson hired CIA Open-Source analyst Nellie Ohr toward the end of 2015, at appropriately the same time as “FBI Contractors” were identified exploiting the NSA database and extracting information on a specific set of U.S. persons. One, if not the primary extractors, has now been identified as Rodney Joffe at Neustar. “The campaign plot was outlined by Durham in a 27-page indictment charging former Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann with making a false report to the FBI. The plot was also outlined in the finished Durham report. Eight individuals who allegedly conspired with Sussmann but does not identify them by name. The sources familiar with the probe confirmed that the leader of the team of contractors was Rodney L. Joffe.” {Go Deep}
It was also Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson who was domestically tasked with a Russian lobbyist named Natalia Veselnitskaya. A little reported Russian Deputy Attorney General named Saak Albertovich Karapetyan was working as a double agent for the CIA and Kremlin. Karapetyan was directing the foreign operations of Natalia Veselnitskaya, and Glenn Simpson was organizing her inside the U.S as part of his Trump-Russia creation.
Glenn Simpson managed Veselnitskaya through the 2016 Trump Tower meeting with Donald Trump Jr. However, once the CIA/Fusion GPS operation using Veselnitskaya started to unravel with public reporting, back in Russia Deputy AG Karapetyan died in a helicopter crash.
Simultaneously timed in late 2015 through mid 2016, there was a domestic FBI operation using a young Russian named Maria Butina tasked to run up against Republican presidential candidates. According to Patrick Byrne, Butina’s handler, was FBI agent Peter Strzok who was giving Byrne the instructions on where to send her. {Go Deep}
All of this context outlines the extent to which the FBI/CIA was openly involved in constructing a political operation that settled upon anyone in candidate Donald Trump’s orbit. A large international operation directed by the FBI/CIA and domestic operations seemingly directed by Peter Strzok operating with a foot in both agencies. [Strzok gets CIA service coin] Durham eviscerated the predicate for all of this in his report, yet stayed away from the part that leads to Robert Mueller in 2017.
Recap: ♦Mifsud tasked against Papadopoulos (CIA). ♦Halper tasked against Flynn (CIA), Page (CIA) and Papadopoulos (CIA). ♦Azra Turk, pretending to be Halper asst, tasked against Papadopoulos (FBI). ♦Veselnitskaya tasked against Donald Trump Jr. (CIA, Fusion GPS). ♦Butina tasked against Trump and Donald Trump Jr (FBI).
Additionally, Christopher Steele was a British intelligence officer hired by Fusion GPS to assemble and launder fraudulent intelligence information within his dossier. And we cannot forget Oleg Deripaska, a Russian oligarch, who was recruited by Asst. FBI Director Andrew McCabe to participate in running an operation against the Trump campaign and create the impression of Russian involvement. Deripaska refused to participate.
All of this engagement directly controlled by U.S. intelligence, and all of this intended to give a specific Russia impression. This predicate was what John Durham was reviewing in November of 2019, and then released in his final report – while whitewashing the parts that led to the Mueller silo.
The key point of all that contextual background is to see how committed the CIA and FBI were to the constructed narrative of Russia interfering with the 2016 election. The CIA, FBI, and by extension the DOJ and a multitude of political operatives, put a hell of a lot of work into it.
We know John Durham looked at the construct of the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA); and talking to CIA analysts who participated in the construct of the January 2017 report that bolstered the false appearance of Russian interference in the 2016 election. This context is important, because it ties in to the next part that involves Julian Assange and Wikileaks. This is where the motives of Mike Pompeo in mid/late 2017 come into play.
[…] By the summer of 2017, the CIA’s proposals were setting off alarm bells at the National Security Council. “WikiLeaks was a complete obsession of Pompeo’s,” said a former Trump administration national security official. (link)
On April 11th, 2019, the Julian Assange indictment was unsealed in the Eastern District of Virginia (EDVA). From the indictment we discover it was under seal since March 6th, 2018:
On Tuesday April 15, 2019, more investigative material was released. Again, note the dates: Grand Jury, *December of 2017* This means FBI investigation prior to….
The FBI investigation took place prior to December 2017, it was coordinated through the Eastern District of Virginia (EDVA) where Dana Boente was U.S. Attorney at the time. The grand jury indictment was sealed from March of 2018 until after Mueller completed his investigation, April 2019.
Why the delay?
What exactly was the DOJ waiting for from March 2018 to April 2019?
This timeframe is the peak of the Robert Mueller/Andrew Weissmann special counsel investigation.
Here’s where it gets interesting….
The Yahoo article outlines, “There was an inappropriate level of attention to Assange“, by the CIA according to a national security council official. However, if you consider the larger ramifications of what Julian Assange represented to all of those people inside and outside government interests who created the Trump-Russia collusion/conspiracy, well, there was actually a serious risk.
Remember, in May 2017 Robert Mueller and Andrew Weissmann effectively took over the DOJ. The purpose of the Mueller investigation was to cover up the illegal operation that took place in the preceding year. The people exposed in the Trump-Russia targeting operation included all of those intelligence operatives previously outlined in the CIA, FBI and DOJ operations. These are the people John Durham did not indict.
The FBI submission to the Eastern District of Virginia Grand Jury in December of 2017 was four months after congressman Dana Rohrabacher talked to Julian Assange in August of 2017: “Assange told a U.S. congressman … he can prove the leaked Democratic Party documents … did not come from Russia.”
(August 2017, The Hill Via John Solomon) Julian Assange told a U.S. congressman on Tuesday he can prove the leaked Democratic Party documents he published during last year’s election did not come from Russia and promised additional helpful information about the leaks in the near future.
Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, a California Republican who is friendly to Russia and chairs an important House subcommittee on Eurasia policy, became the first American congressman to meet with Assange during a three-hour private gathering at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, where the WikiLeaks founder has been holed up for years.
Rohrabacher recounted his conversation with Assange to The Hill.
“Our three-hour meeting covered a wide array of issues, including the WikiLeaks exposure of the DNC [Democratic National Committee] emails during last year’s presidential election,” Rohrabacher said, “Julian emphatically stated that the Russians were not involved in the hacking or disclosure of those emails.”
Pressed for more detail on the source of the documents, Rohrabacher said he had information to share privately with President Trump. (read more)
Dana Rohrabacher later published this account of the events:
Knowing how much effort the CIA and FBI put into the Russia collusion-conspiracy narrative; and knowing that Assange could essentially destroy the baseline predicate for the entire Trump-Russia investigation – which included the use of Robert Mueller; it would make sense for corrupt government officials to take keen interest after this August 2017 meeting between Rohrabacher and Assange.
That contact between Rohrabacher and Assange explains why those same government officials would quickly gather specific evidence (related to Wikileaks and Bradley Manning) for a grand jury by December 2017.
Within three months of the grand jury seating (Nov/Dec 2017), the DOJ generated an indictment and sealed it in March 2018.
The EDVA then sat on the Julian Assange indictment while the Mueller/Weissman probe was ongoing.
As soon as the Mueller probe ended, on April 11th, 2019, a planned and coordinated effort between the U.K. and U.S. was executed; Julian Assange was forcibly arrested and removed from the Ecuadorian embassy in London, and the EDVA indictment was unsealed (link).
As a person who researched this fiasco, including the ridiculously false 2016 Russian hacking/interference narrative: “17 intelligence agencies”, Joint Analysis Report (JAR) needed for Obama’s anti-Russia narrative in December ’16, and then a month later the ridiculously political Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) in January ’17, this timing against Assange is not coincidental.
It doesn’t take a deep researcher to see the aligned Deep State motive to control Julian Assange, because the Mueller report was dependent on Russia cybercrimes, and that narrative is contingent on the Russia DNC hack story which Julian Assange disputes. Again, John Durham stayed away from it!
♦ This is critical. The Weissmann/Mueller report contains claims that Russia hacked the DNC servers as the central element to the Russia interference narrative in the U.S. election.
This claim is the fulcrum underpinning the Russia election interference narrative. However, this core and essential claim is directly disputed by Julian Assange, as outlined during the Dana Rohrabacher interview, and by Julian Assange’s on-the-record statements.
The predicate for Robert Mueller’s investigation was specifically due to Russian interference in the 2016 election.
The fulcrum for this Russia interference claim is the intelligence community assessment (Peter Strzok); and the only factual evidence claimed within the ICA is that Russia hacked the DNC servers; a claim only made possible by relying on forensic computer analysis from another Michael Sussmann partner, Shawn Henry at Crowdstrike, yes another DNC contractor and collaborator with the Clinton campaign.
The CIA held a massive conflict of self-interest problem surrounding the Russian hacking claim as it pertained to their own activity in 2016. The FBI and DOJ always held a massive interest in maintaining the Russian hacking claim. Robert Mueller and Andrew Weismann did everything they could to support that predicate; and all of those foreign countries whose intelligence apparatus participated with Brennan and Strzok also carried a self-interest in maintaining that Russia hacking and interference narrative.
Julian Assange was/is the only person with direct knowledge of how Wikileaks gained custody of the DNC emails; and Assange claimed he has evidence it was from an inside DNC leak, not from a DNC hack.
The Russian “hacking” claim was ultimately so important to the CIA, FBI, DOJ, ODNI and U.K Intelligence apparatus. Well, right there is the obvious motive to shut Assange down as soon as intelligence officials knew the Mueller report was going to be public. And that is exactly what Main Justice and the U.S. intelligence community did.
This is why John Durham never touched it.
All of them know what happened.
All of them know why Julian Assange was taken from the Embassy in London. A bag had to be thrown over Assange in order to retain the justification for the Weissmann/Mueller special counsel and the larger Russian election interference claims. None of them do not know this. They all know.
Start asking the right questions about the timeline of Assange being arrested. Ask about the DNC hack and Russian provenance according to Crowdstrike. Ask key and specific questions about the FBI working with Crowdstrike and about the DOJ and EDVA case against Assange.
The people around the Deep State all know what happened. SO DO WE!
The man needs to be released, along with every person held for any possible involvement with J6.
haven’t watched the video yet, just landed on the article
so did Tucker ask Assange the right f*cking questions?
You have to pay to hear it. Don’t have the money to pay so who knows?
thx, patty
Which I believe answers the question of why he waited 51 days to release the interview. He had to finish building his paywall.
Not judging. Its good business. He should be paid for his work. If you wanted to entice people to open their wallets and join your network that’s the interview and teaser that would do it.
The other big “why” about Tucker: Why did he wait THREE YEARS before acknowledging 2020 was stolen?
Tucker questioned the validity of the 2020 election many times between Nov 2020 and when he left Fox News.
It’s free on Rumble.
Just another effort to hide their own crimes.
Protect the ring leaders is the primary directive. Everything else is just a distraction.
Declass without redaction, all COMMS by the Tier 1 & Tier 2 Ring Leaders.
This is the devastation that a re-elected PT can bring and why they must stop him.
Remember the primary directive!
Actually, Snowden has a very interesting interview where he asserts that a bureaucratic government, at the highest level, is about risk management, avoiding any criticism and avoiding any culpability…it is a highly dangerous mindset to be overseeing a free nation and can only end badly.
The interview is out there and effectively it points to the present approval to suddenly discuss UFOs by the government to be a distraction from us seeing what they are doing…
I couldn’t find the original one I was watching, but this has much of hte same issue
What Edward Snowden Just Revealed About UFO’s Is Terrifying And Should Concern All Of Us
That last line is their title, not mine.
re: “What Edward Snowden Just Revealed About UFOs”
Yeah, not buying any of that. Someone has to say it, and it may as well be me.
Call me cynical, what is this latest Tucker move drawing attention….
Away from?
It’s not.
It is a coordinated triple punch campaign to unnerve the other side into making a stupid move.
Punch one: Epstein list about to be published.
Punch two: John Solomon may be about to get the Crossfire Hurricane binder, and he will p
Publish it.
Punch three: word comes to the fore there are FISA tapes on Biden because of the relationship with Patrick Ho.
Now Tucker tells the truth about the DMC leak being an inside job, no Russians, and THEY DO NOT KNOW RIGHT NOW WHETHER ASSANGE OR SOMEONE ELSE GAVE HIM PROOF.
Incoming fire from all sides.
Someone is going to either break and confess or do something really, really stupid and self defeating.
And we are here for it.
Moar popcorn.
Yep, and does this have anything to do with the fib being told to produce the Seth Rich laptop/contents?
Interesting about Pompeo…never trusted him.
Good catch. I missed that one.
Five swords, hanging by a thread, above all their heads.
Which one will fall first?
Btw, here are two candidates for the Epstein list (although Isaac Kappy already named Hanks so no surprise there)
https://revolver.news/2023/12/curious-old-snl-clips-emerge-the-rock-joking-about-child-molestation-pizza/
“It’s called robo Chobo it’s powered by solar rechargeable fuel cells and it costs pennies to manufacture. It can theoretically molest twice as many children.”
What a horrible sadistic skit. However, as bad as it is, does it shed some real sunlight on the extreme cult of ‘climate change’? All of the elite oligarchs out there spouting off about this has always given me the creeps.
Carpenter_E did a nice summation. The Rock skit was jaw dropping.
Interesting about Pompeo…never trusted him
Fat boy had a tummy tuck
Trust Kansas.
No he didn’t, according to him he exercised every day////
Tiki Tok John Solomon, Durham has the goods? *gag*
The Epstein list will contain nothing new. If you read Techno Fog you know that most of the names here are known and many of the names on the list are NOT people who ever went to the island, not people who are even suspected of fooling around with girls under 18.
You and I might read Technofog and look at Isaac Kappy livestreams.
Your average Joe out there has no idea Tom Hanks is a pedophile who went to Epstein island and got Greek citizenship so he’d have a pedo friendly jurisdiction to which to flee.
It’s a shatterpoint for the normies. to find out that truth.
Don’t discount the psychological effects of seeing the devils behind the masks.
Splash
Big
Forrest Gump
Saving Private Ryan
Apollo 13
Cast Away
He’s part of the weavings of time and memory in people’s lives.
I remember when Princess Diana died. There was an emotional shock wave that you could not credit if you hadn’t been there, because in some way she had become a part of the psychological framework of the public mind.
Hanks is like that. Maybe others on that list too.
They are not sleeping well. And the ones who are in that list, AND in the binder, AND mentioned in the Seth Rich laptop . . . baggy eyes, man. Baggy eyes.
What does Seth Rich have to do with Epstein ?
Government sanctioned murder, maybe?
Arkancide
At least one of those is/was on my top ten best movies of all time.
I was very sad to learn about Tom Hanks the man.
Truly one of the last actors I would have suspected.
Now we don’t watch anything with or from him.
And it is not like I expect moral character in actors. I try to let them just be people with a job. But some do get past that into our hearts and I agree that Hanks is one of those and it will be disturbing for folks. The very fact that all this lurks just past that red pill is why many keep desperately digging down deeper into the sand.
Beloved by millions, just like Bill Cosby once was.
I remember Sir Patrick Mack doing video on that. He did some great stuff.
That connection has been alluded to for years
John Solomon got a copy of Hunter’s laptop too.
My view on Solomon.
John Solomon seems to get an awful lot of information from varied sources.
John Solomon makes lots of claims about the validity and importance of that information and innuendos about what it might mean and what might happen due to that information being “known”.
At the same time, he also withholds most of his attained information. He seems to release only a small segment of all that actual information and mostly reports just shallow, “siloed” tidbits to the public. I always feel I’m drinking highly filtered “Information Light” when I read or watch his “Just The News” segments.
YIBSLMV (Your Intellectual Beverage Satisfaction Level May Very) <smiles>
I turn on the mute button when “Just The News” is on then go to GTTR to watch the second hour of War Room. Solomon is controlled and used. I won’t forget all his “tic toc” on Hannity. Him and Sarah Carter….had enough of those 3 a long time ago.
Solomon will pull a Lucy football snatch as he usually does.
Coordinated? Who is leading the effort?
I believe Sundance over the goernment every time
Absolutely.
This just further proves their Alinsky tactic of “Accuse others of what you yourself are doing”. President Trump wasn’t colluding with the Russians but the DNC and every ‘intelligence’ agency certainly were. Disgusting!
I believe it’s the oligarchs who perennially dispatch their guerilla mercenaries to assassinate Putin. And it’s those guerilla mercenaries who our deep state collude… Why else would FBI/DNI land with both jack boots on Miley’s neck for all those phone conferences with his Russian “counterpart.
What our government officials did against President Trump, the United States and its citizens was almost like an insurrection.
Or maybe treason.
They have the MSM in their pockets. Those talking heads should also be tried for treason as they have been willfully complicit in carrying their message to the American public.
I would only change this to read “I believe Sundance over the government every time and over anything Mr. Late to the Game Carlson is trying to sell.”
Mr Carlson is now in the same crosshairs that Assange was in. He is trying to save himself, so he can be excused for going silent for now. If I were in such a situation I might be hiding in a third world country myself. Tucker is an example of what happens when an honest person finds out too much about the DC Swamp. Someone else we know is now also on the list. The Intelligence community has been running our 4th Branch for around 80 years and that coincides with the Communist infiltration of the FDR Administration. The plot sickens.
I’ve seen clips where Tucker talks about how he doesn’t care if he dies at this point. He wants the information out there. Seemed weird, but I’m sure it is in reference to Assange and how he’s been treated.
Similar to my first thoughts to SD’s question ‘Why 51 days later?’ … Because he wanted to finish out 2023? A nice Christmas with family?
By the way… This is the first time I have really understood this subject. 6+ years after the psyop began. The ‘news’ all seemed so random and disjointed and mysteriously ‘upper eschelon’ previously. (Thanks SD.)
Great work! I’m going to read this again. Wow. Thank you
I have argued at a political debate forum on Assange’s behalf in regards to the sexual assault allegations and releasing/publicizing the info he did. But if Assange gave Manning ideas/ways of how to obtain classified info, that is conspiracy and he needs to stand trial.
I agree. But do we really believe that assange will ever HAVE a free and fair trial. Just look at the actors involved here. And the enormous amount of resources spent to silence him.
you see in a reasonable world, yes, discovery in court would be helpful. But lets be serious, discovery is never going to happen to inform US, WE THE PEOPLE..nor will discovery be allowed to provide assange with a fair due process in trial.
again, we are talking about NATIONAL SECURITY OF THE UNITED STATES. Assange is just one of many who dared to fight and publish against that. Look at the lengths they went to get LTGEN Flynn in prison? the corrupt judge. You think it will be any different for Assange. No way. Assange represents a deep hardened difference between a corrupt central secret police spy state and the rest of the WORLD. They will never allow him a free trial. let me give you some questions to consider: why did obama give clemency to manning? if this was really a crime so serious to be recognized as a breach to the most important cornerstones of US national security, why was manning set free?
answer: he cut a deal and provided false witness against assange. That sealed testimon, oathed and before a grand jury was not mannings’ idea. It was the deal made for him to make sure that assange would never see the freedom and the light of day.
as it stands right now, the US (CIA) and UK (MI6) have coordinated and agreement to be in controversy over “handling” the extradition of assange. The “official” line is that the UK does not extradite people who would become subject to capitol punishment. Additionally, UK laws allows them to hold assange in prison awaiting a negotiated agreement with the US that WILL NEVER HAPPEN. And so the US refuses to bargain with UK. And so, assange remains locked up in belmarsh, and will likely die there …and that outcome is satisfactory to both the US (CIA) and UK (MI6).
It will take a pardon from President Trump to remove the CIA from the equation. But this will still not resolve the issue that the UK (MI6) has with assange. They will likely charge him with some other crime and lock him away…
why? a freeman, Assange, would never stop talking about and publishing falsifiable evidence of specific people who committed treasonous crimes.
the most dangerous man alive. julian assange.
God Bless America
“the most dangerous man alive. julian assange.”
I honestly cannot still believe he’s alive.
“answer: he cut a deal and provided false witness against assange. That sealed testimon, oathed and before a grand jury was not mannings’ idea. It was the deal made for him to make sure that assange would never see the freedom and the light of day.”
.
Re Manning: or Obama actually doesn’t care about “national security” when stolen documents only harm the military, not the corruptocrats (see Bergdahl) — and Manning is a tranny, so…
Assange is no hero. He released reams of stolen stuff for years that he should not have. He is no journalist. He did not write. He released documents. Indiscriminately. Much of it for no high purpose whatsoever.
And, moreover, he sat on the source of the DNC hack when he knew or should have known that providing this information would help stop horrendous wrongs against Trump and the people of the United States. He did it on a gamble to preserve his “brand” and for his own power and publicity. Because wtf kind of integrity is it to offer to release source material in exchange for a pardon.
He should have published his proof way earlier. But noooo… cloak-and-daggar. Really didn’t give a shit about anything except his subversive and indiscriminate spew of wikileaks.
.
you do realize that you just wrote verbatim the ALLEGED NARRATIVE BY THE SECRET POLICE SPY STATE>?
do you seriously trust that the media was just given unfettered fair and balanced information about the allegations, and the merits of the charges laid against him.
here is a critical thinking test: sort out WHY sweden would charge him with a crime of rape (consentual sex by the way, but did not wear a condom IS CONSIDERED RAPE…bet you never heard that little detail, why sweden “protected” the woman who never filed a claim of rape. never named her, and never told the full explanation of what the term rape means? So if you do that homework and you still trust the secret police spy state…then we have much more than a simple disagreement.
assange has never been in a court room. never had the opportunity to defend himself. never had the prosecutors evidence and witnesess been crossed.
and so upon what information are you so certain that he committed crime?
it’s the same question we all have and see with our own eyes with President Trump. Both men share one thing in common: the are opposed to a secret police spy state…they dare to speak up and apply sunlight to crimes and corruption
next question: have you even read anything from wikileaks? serious question.
Just think about the BIG PICTURE HERE.
God Bless America
.
you do realize that you just wrote verbatim the ALLEGED NARRATIVE BY THE SECRET POLICE SPY STATE>?
How so? I don’t think the IC would be pissed off because Assange did not release his evidence re Seth Rich. I’m saying that he was wrong to have not released it early and timely.
WHY sweden would charge him with a crime of rape
I can’t say for sure, but it looks like a typical CIA/FBI tactic. They try this a lot (Trump, e.g.!!)
upon what information are you so certain that he committed crime?
I didn’t say he committed a crime; he may or may not have. What I said was that he released an indiscriminate spew of documents for no real purpose except his own self-promotion.
next question: have you even read anything from wikileaks?
Some. A lot that was useless and purposeless. Assange is no American patriot.
.
Sounds like Mr.Outhouse would have opposed the release of the Pentagon Papers, too.
Your moniker is apropos.
The last two bullet points from the True Bill/Indictment of Assange.
24. On or about March 8, 2010, Manning provided Assange with part of a password
stored on United States Department of Defense computers connected to the Secret Internet
Protocol Network.
25. On or about March 10, 2010, Assange requested more information from Manning
related to the password. Assange indicated that he bad been trying to crack the password by
stating that he had “no luck so far.”
I have no heard anyone argue that info is manufactured, so if those points are true, he is guilty of conspiracy.
Link to True Bill/Indictment. – https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1153486/download
that’s right, what you just read is a charge created by prosecutors. from the DOJ.
whether you trust that allegation is subject to what?
remember who we are dealing with here. KNOWN CRIMINALS IN THE DOJ who will indict a ham sandwich..they have done it repeatedly against people who dare to oppose their power..what they represent.
and even IF the charge contains facts, we have never seen a courtroom hearing have we. because that has not taken place..has it?
so again, the main is INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY. My bias, based being INFORMED about the WHOLE CENTER of this case, is that Assange was no more guilty of a crime than any other newspaper and journalist who published the same information.
and lastly…can you please explain to me and the rest of the world that an attempt to crack a password, unsuccessfully, amount to espionage? conspiracy perhaps, but not espionage. The indictment contains no evidence the “hack” was successful, even if we concede the story is true. So here is the question:
how does THAT CRIME (conceding the story is true) level out to a possible capitol punishment?
you starting to understand the problem here. Not only is he being accused of a crime but the very indictment shows he was unsuccessful ..there was no harm…broke the law in only the slightest way…conspired with another to breach a national security system. And so how do we reconcile that UK is blocking his transfer under extradition because UK law does not permit release of persons who face capitol punishment. And yet, the US refuses to relent on that charge! If the US was really interested in proving him guilty, why isn’t it so crystal clear that the US would enter an agreement that his “crimes” will not involve capitol punishment. How about imprisonment for life…or better yet, TIME SERVED IN BELMARSH.
noting: in the last 10 years, the DOJ/FBI has alleged that at least 14 ATP criminal hackers NAMED (*yes individual people named), breached critical national security systems. (and many other systems that fall just short of national security systems but are equally vital…see: solar winds). And yet NO ONE SINGLE PERSON CONTAINED IN ANY OF THOSE INDICTMENTS HAVE BEEN CHARGED WITH CRIMES THAT HAVE CAPITOL PUNISHMENTS??
really..seriously…lets just stop pretending. We know what this is about: assange is a direct threat to living people who have committed treason and other crimes and these people want to avoid blowback when he is released to resume speaking about it and publishing it. So they want to kill him to protect their asses.
THEY HAVE SAID SO IN PUBLIC. I can name 27 different people in positions of power in the US (and UK) who have the power, the influence and the cause to actually carry out his execution. The only reason they can’t dare do it while he is in prison is because EPSTEIN !
kill assange in prison and you break the world. Simple as that. They know it, we know it, they know we know it.
so they will just let him rot in prison and let time take his life…while they “debate” about extradition terms.
President Trump goes back into office 2024. One of his first tasks to start draining the swamp and fulfilling justice is to pardon Assange and see that he has a means to talk and to be specific about criminals in the secret police spy state. If that gets assange killed, I think he will consider it with the same level of courage he has shown THAT THE REST OF US COULD USE AS A PRETTY GOOD MODEL TO BASE ON OUR MORAL LIVES. One man stood up to corrupt power and what did WE DO?
that, my friend is the question.
God Bless America
That information is based on what “he indicated”.
“Assange indicated that he bad been trying to crack the password by
stating that he had “no luck so far.””
If that is true, he is guilty of conspiracy as charged and has nothing to do with what ever-else you choose to imagine.
As for President Trump. He called Manning a traitor. It wouldn’t surprise me one bit if he thought the same about Manning’s co-conspirator.
The best Assange could hope for is getting any sentence he receives commuted like Manning received from Obama.
guilty then it is. before being proved. based on the proof supplied to you by the most corrupt “law enforcement” agency in the world.
good job. hope that works out for you.
tune in next week when you’ll be convinced that epstein really did kill himself and that the election was free of fraud.
I mean why not. Bill Barr said so.
who am I to disagree with bill barr.
right?
right.
God Bless America
Assange unintentionally gave up his life by bringing down Hillary Clinton. It has been a helluva price to pay, but man-oh-man — I am eternally grateful. These satanic vipers need to be exposed and cancelled.
Apply this to our reps and the speaker of the house when it comes to being briefed on “security issues”….How can they believe any of the crap that comes from the IC? Do they not have the ability to connect the corrupt dots of the IC. So the House committee comes out to inform the public , that based on our intelligence briefing we should do x y z…..RIGHT….based on a big pile of lies.
I find your replies to be as hilarious as they are in unsubstantiated thought. “epstein” Really? lol
Your replies also ignore that I predicated what I said with “if” in regards to the specific mentioned evidence and instead act like I hadn’t.
“if Assange gave” – “if those points are true” – “If that is true”
“guilty then it is. before being proved. based on the proof supplied to you by the most corrupt “law enforcement” agency in the world.”
Most corrupt? lol With the existence of all the third world nations – I would love to be in the gallery as someone tried to argue that in a Court of Law. That person would be laughed out of the Court Room.
Has Assange ever said that specific was untrue?
Either the information is true or it is not, and I have not seen any refutation of it by him … or by you.
So again; If it is true, he is guilty of conspiracy.
“kill assange in prison and you break the world. Simple as that. They know it, we know it, they know we know it.”
This implies Assange has a deadman’s switch. If he dies a natural death in prison, the switch will activate…and break the world. Meaning, expose the treason of very big names.
I would like to add a datapoint. Dennis Montgomery, author of Scorecard and another program for rigging elections electronically, may have used backdoors of his own design to allow the actual * election * of Donald Trump in 2016, averting the selection of HER. You could see the utter shock on all their faces, Obama, all of them when Trump won in 2016.
The deep State desperately tried to delegitimize the 2016 election with Russia Russia Russia. The obvious rigging of the 2020 election is just more of the web they must weave to avoid exposure. The deep state is trying to outrun the truth. The truth is steadily gaining on them.
That all depends. What is the “classified info’ and why was it classified? More often that not info is not classified to protect America, but to protect criminals in government.
It was fake classified info.
how is it that an Austrlian citizen in England is subject to US criminal law for publishing “The Pentagon info given to him from Iraq, (like the classified Pentagon Papers, NY Times v Sullivan all happened in the US and was OK) ?
Because rich men with power follow whatever rules they want, make them up as they go, and crush anyone who dares stand up to them.
Because … we are the world or something …
@ Beau
It’s only treason if you lose. Pick a side sparky
A U.S. Attorney can not act as a special counsel, It is a conflict of interest for the government to investigate itself. The whole investigation was a show. It was not legal to appoint Durham to the position.
manipulation of language.
Mueller was a President appointed FBI Director that got Senate confirmed….
Pervert language to understand your enemy
Durham was appointed to keep the evidence Trump wanted released out of sight. It was under the “umbrella” as long as an investigation was ongoing. It certainly won’t be made public as long as the crooks control the Presidency.
Start breaking the right glassware.
Julian Assange implied that Seth Rich was murdered for leaking the DNC emails:
Rich WAS murdered for that reason. Podesta knows all the details .
Oh, the web they weave. And we ask why did, say, pompeo not support Trump for 2024 or barr. Now we know…they ALL are guilty. Our job is enormous. Prepare, pray, be resolute, be wise, be safe. Thank you, Sundance. Blessings.
PS: has anyone ever heard what happened to hasper? She sorta just disappeared.
I think she went to work for the Chris Wray Sally Yates law firm?
Thick as thieves.
They did ALL of that to prove that the 2016 election was stolen…and yet we have mountains of evidence that the 2020 election really was stolen from We The People and they arrest, bellitle, imprison, and spew every vitriolic lie they possible can against us because WE Speak The Truth!
One thing that has bothered me about this… why didn’t Trump pardon Assange/Snowden when he had the chance?
Probably because he thought the CIA would kill him if he did.
He would not have been wrong.
Even more concerning is why didn’t PDJT investigate the Rohrabacher contact? If it panned out, the mueller/weissman attacks would be terminated with prejudice, and all those actively participating in the “russia, russia” scheme could be fired to stop them from continuing to work agzinst the PDJT administration. . The Seth Rich murderers could be identified (The DC cameras which are everywhere, could be ‘found’…)
So, why the “russia, russia” schemers ignored Rohrabacher is clear, but why did PDJT not have someone he ‘trusted’ contact Rohrabacher? Maybe there was no one trustworthy, anywhere in the entire US government?
No, there isn’t.
The only person I trust w/Trump is Dan Scavino, and he isn’t gov’t.
What makes you think HE didn’t?
Because Gen. Kelly, then COS, did not pass on the information. That’s how things work in District of Corruption.
I recall reading several articles at the time that Mitch McConnell would vote “Yes” to impeach Pres. Trump if he was to pardon Assange or Snowden.
My guess as to waiting 51 days is that it’s going to bring a lot of traffic to his new TCN (Tucker Carlson Network) . This ain’t on Twitter and it ain’t free neither.
negasht7: Yup. It’s all marketing and money making. There is no deeper significance. Tucker is a good showman, similar in this regard to Musk.
except musk is awesome and Tucker is just another in a long line of half-wit talking heads.
Nothing wrong w/making money, just kinda taints the situation that Tucker is using this story to launch his pay for me program. Cheesy.
Someone will put it on Bitchute or elsewhere.
$6 bucks a month. Way less than an old newspaper subscription. I pay for several substack writers as well. Just like Sundance, they should get paid for their work. It’s the American way. Well, it used to be anyway.
Yes. I pay for several Substack authors’ columns. I only pay if i find their work consistently factual, original, substantive, and /or offering new and useful insights into what may have previously been reported.
Hi Joshua2415-
I don’t object at all to him monetizing content. It occurred to me just now Sundance may have been a little tongue-in-cheek with his wondering.
Why wait? Paid content subscriptions on your own platform. That’s why. Plus I believe it dovetails with court hearings coming up.
As Steve Bannon would say, “Acton, Action, Action!”
Thanks Sundance! Printing this now…this is the type of detail EVERY SINGLE useless, feckless and blackmailed CONgressman should have.
Too many news stories right now…why this interview and why now? Is it to take away from the Epstein list? The Hunter contempt of CONgress? The multiple wars being waged? The banking industry disaster? Discovery in one or more important legal challenges? The absolute silence of Garland and the re-emergence of Lisa Monaco speaking about terror threats?
Something is up for sure.
Something is up to be sure, it’s called boiling milk.
The true killers of Seth Rich are also within this group.
tucker has a set of balls ..I give him that. Whether this moves the needle to free assange and more importantly to GET THE MESSAGE UNDERSTOOD BY WE THE PEOPLE. That remains to be seen.
But I give tucker credit. He went head first and wasn’t afraid to say the things out loud…
the truth you see IS a lion. set it free, it depends itself.
and if the truth changes hearts and minds, then the world changes.
noting: I’m still bothered by tucker in some respects…but then I never applied a filter to the dude at mercury news ..or even assange.
I JUST READ THE CONTENT. THE INFORMATION. And THAT is what compels me to actionS
God Bless America
God Bless America
…naming Mike Pompeo was interesting….🤔
The Beast aka your photo wanted to drone Assange. I wonder how many drinks they had plotting and scheming together how to take Assange out?
“Why wait 51 days? Your guess is as good as mine.”
I expect that they had to fight with the DOJ and FBI to get clearance to air this. “National security”, don’t you know?
Assange’s final appeal to the British High Court against extradition (to his death) here in the US is set for February, 2024.
https://www.reuters.com/world/julian-assanges-final-appeal-against-us-extradition-be-held-february-2023-12-19/
I think he waited for it to appear on his channel.
Didn’t know the fine points, but knew Assange was not what “they” were claiming.
Imagine Sundance sitting next to a re-elected PT as one of his drain the swamp advisors as they develop and plan out how to drain the swamp.
Sundance can IMMEDIATELY feed PT the specifics on virtually all of the DS players going all the way back to 2008 if needed.
Oh how I hope PT reads CTH daily.
Or someone close to PDJT and who is 100% loyal to PDJT and reports all the facts & info that are revealed here.
if the TExas_lyndsay woman that met Assange is true… then he definitely told Tucker Seth was involved
If I remember correctly, demonic agent strzok was about to get canned prior to 2016, yet someone stepped in and saved him from the pink slip. Would that have been imam Brennan?
Shocked? After the last 15+ years, I have become unshockable regarding the evil that goes on in DC.
While we’re reading and discussing the corruption of the CIA and FBI, we should be talking about the criminality of our own government.
Whatever happened to his gummy girlfriend?
And to think, We the taxpayers, paid for every single portion of this monstrosity is sickening!
PDJT forecasted is ready made already done executive order or re-clawing back corruption money.
we should be good if we make it… but good no matter if this makes it or not.
Repeal 16th Amendment. Make them beg for every single tax dollars. No more automatic crack payments sent to Beltway addicts.
I’m guessing he waited until he had a sub only platform, knowing people would sign up just to see that interview.
Sundances “I have no idea” is quite droll,..given 51 days ago Tuckers only outlet was Twitter, and given Sundances recent assertion he had it on good authority that TC was publically expressing trust in Elon, and privately saying the opposite…
Funny,…very funny!
Who got used the most by Obama/Biden charade to perpetuate the Russia-Russia-Russia hoax, well into the Biden administration?
(1) Ukraine for being an expendable malefactor sitting duck?
Or (2) Russia for getting green-lighted by Biden/Obama to invade and take back the Crimea.
Too many dogs who did not bark in this entire deep state (and their unions) Anti-Trump Russia-Russia-Russia insurrection.
Keep the heat on – many of are still waiting for the answers why all those dogs did not bark.
Raw marketing?
I don’t get it.
I’m not sure why the cynics are so sure everything comes down to money. Tucker’s kids are grown and as long as he doesn’t get Giuliani’d, he and his wife are never going to starve. And he can always go catch some trout.
He just told Tim Pool he believes in the existence of demons (a belief that is something newly found for many of us), and he has been told by some people the elites are actively allied with the demons.
He’s keeping an open mind about the alleged alliance, but to be honest I’m right there with him.
I don’t see how you can doubt the reality of demonic possession after seeing Peter Strzock’s eyes and facial expressions while testifying.
Money doesn’t matter that much when you realize our elites are evil to their core
Are the demons the same as the UFO’s and Aliens that is such a dark and deep topic he won’t speak with his wife about it? I thought that was a weird thing to say.
“It is my personal belief, based on a fair amount of evidence, uh, they’re not aliens. They’ve always been here.”
https://truthsocial.com/@MBP/posts/111621302871075959
Not clear on what interview will have taken place. Tucker indicates that the British government will not allow any one to speak with Assange, and he says so they went anyway.
On TCN, the posted 14 minute video only has Tucker talking to the camera on a bus going to the prison and then for about 7 minutes on the bus after coming out of the prison. No inside video. Just Tucker talking and a few minutes (in the first half) of Assange’s wife talking about the prison security process to get inside.
British Gov’t will not allow video or notes or audio taping, while interviewing prisoners,
I understand. Tucker obviously must have known that before going, so I’m thinking / hoping he has more to say from his interview with Assange in another video.
Re-read the official report on Trump’s phone call to Zelenskyy that led to Nancy Pelosi’s failed Trump Impeachment #1.
The part of the phone call dealing with CROWDSTRIKE investigation into the DNC hack was totally ignored and even worse, claimed it dealt with a long -bebunked conspiracy theory. Instead they concentrated on Trump “attacking his potential 2020 opponent Joe Biden, when in fact all Trump did was ask more about Hunter Biden and his unusual relationships in Ukraine.
Two dogs that did not bark, and were never investigated further nor explained. Only the false narrative the Trump phone call was about Joe Biden.
Not CROWDSTRIKE and not what looked like a pay to play Hunter Biden mutual shakedown with Ukraine.
Crowdstrike used Falcon that identified USBs put into machines for potential theft.
if true, they werent looking for a hack either.
Seth the USB carrier.
the Director of what? Registration? Voter Rolls. he saw
it doesnt look for hackers or frisbees or waterballoons. if true, its based on looking for flash drives put into your devices to download
https://www.crowdstrike.com/blog/tech-center/falcon-device-control/
Maybe the simple answer is that Tucker wanted to unveil his new paid streaming platform before the release of the interview. A Julian Asante interview is a big deal and would bring customers to his new platform.
Please re-watch the video. Tucker specifically states that the authorities will not allowed Assange to be interviewed. Until proven otherwise I’m going to assume there’s no interview. Not that this isn’t an extremely important issue. It’s just not a given that an interview even occurred.
Tucker describes meeting Assange in person and asking Assange questions. Videotaping was not allowed.
Another Meuller, Horowitz-Durham dog that did not bark was never learning why SAMANTHA POWERS made” hundreds of FISA unmasking requests” in the final hours of the Obama administration, when she clearly had no need to know this information. What did she do with that very sensitive FISA information . Who was she spying on, in connection with those American names.
Is her list of unmasked American citizen part of this potential next shoe to drop? Who were those people on her list and why did she need to find out. Why, after this clear misfeasance on her part, did she suddenly show up in Biden’s USAID – long believed to be a CIA front.
It’s a shame that after all the build up in the trailer, the actual video is NOT an interview but only a few minutes of Tucker’s recall (on the bus leaving the prison) of a few brief highlights from his one hour talk with Julian. The first 7 minutes of the video is on the bus traveling towards the prison with Tucker talking to Julian’s wife about the lengthy process they must go though to get inside to visit with Julian. If there is another video with more information from the actual interview I could not find it on Tuckercarlson.com
Thanks for sharing whats ACTUALLY there, which is NOT whats promised.
So, Mr. “Speaker of Truth Tucker” is doing “clickbait” or what used to be called “bait and switch”?
Really calls into question his whole honesty schtick.
That was my concern as well after seeing the “trailer”…sounds like a very long walk for a very short of water! Was thinking about signing up for TCN but may hold off for a while longer. Several of the “interviews” he has participated in lately seem to be lacking a LOT in actual substance and it almost feels like he is SO desperate to keep his name out there that he is talking with anyone who will sit down with him and that’s not a good look, IMHO!
VM, I have found his interviews mostly interesting and thought about the time required to plan, schedule, conduct, and edit the interview for publishing. Some of his interviews are conducted away from his home studio – requiring travel logistics – and most are conducted within his Maine home studio. Those require travel logistics for the interviewee and whatever staff he or she might bring along.
Tucker has a staff but IDK how many are physically with him or operate remotely from their home states.
IMHO Tucker very likely has a long list of high caliber potential interviewees but cannot logistically schedule them all within a short time frame. Most high caliber people also have busy schedules. So he fills in scheduling gaps with people HE wants to interview for whatever reasons. I wasn’t especially fond of his interviews of the two men over in Romania or of John Daly. Admittedly we are all different in our “tastes” for interview candidates. But it’s his show. Overall I’m liking it about 80-85% of the time.
I would agree with your assessment…most of the time I think he is doing a pretty good job finding interesting people with important information to share, whether I “agree” with their viewpoints or not!
I think some of the interviews that I have liked the least are the ones where he is on someone else’s show and isn’t really directing the questions and those might be the ones that I would caution him against accepting (not that he is soliciting MY opinion! LOL!)
I think he, like Naomi Wolf and Robert Malone, to mention a few others, are starting to really question the world they have inhabited for the past 30-40 years and are suddenly seeing the disconnect between what they have been told and what is actually true and it is fascinating to watch their eyes open! Interestingly, I think all three of the aforementioned people are also starting to dig much deeper into spiritual questions and that is leading them in directions they maybe had not considered going…
👍👍 I especially like and agree with your observations in the third paragraph. Very astute.!
Dutch I would not yet pass judgement on Tucker. Considering every other interview he has published of late, there are quite obviously some hurdles he was unable to get over. The video leaves too many unanswered questions to be representative of Tuckers’ normally high quality, hard-hitting commentary.
Something else is at issue here and my guess is we will learn about that in the coming days. The inside-the-bus video ends abruptly so it’s obvious he had much more to say. He may well have been directly threatened by the DOJ or some very high official in the current Administration since they knew every detail of his trip to UK to visit Assange.
Follow the money.
Outstanding Sundance! Don’t know how you do this analysis for all us supporters on CTH. I am so thankful I found CTH around the time then Mr Trump came down that escalator in Trump Tower. Back then I said to my husband Donald Trump will be our President.
Alex suggests possible FISA tapes were made of Joe Biden and Ho – as a third shoe to drop?
What is the timing on this – does this explain the “hundreds of unmasking” FISA requests” were made by Samantha Powers?
Were requests made using her name (which is what she claims) by Team JoeBama to learn what goods FISA might have on Joe and/or Hunter Biden and this mysterious foreign player Ho?
Ho, ho, ho ……..Merry Christmas everyone.
It’s not just that the Bidens were caught in the FISA surveillance on Ho, it’s that Congress in the exercise of its oversight authority can subpoena those tapes and make them public – just like they did with the Flynn Kislyak tape.
I can’t find the link now to the article, but it dropped on the last 24 hours.
In a way, it’s old news, but it is getting exposure now.
May have been on Badlands media.
Thinking Tucker’s 51 day hold on the interview was due to the craziness of the last few weeks.
Dropping it on a Friday makes sense…there’s no big event like last weekend with Hunter bs, new Trump stuff, plus all the Congressional turds are on vacation.
This may be the pause that refreshes, a few days b4 Xmas.
Or Tucker is controlled opposition, working with the weaponized govt, like Elon appears to be.
Two shmucks.
WEll, there IS a big event–Christmas Eve/Christmas
Crossfire Hurricane binder – gone missing.
A judge may be about to grant summary judgment for John Solomon, granting its release to him as he has a right to it as President Trump’s representative for Archives purposes, and as it was declassified. John Solomon and Kash Patel, I think, have both seen the contents of that binder.
It was a John Solomon article.
Here is the link:
https://justthenews.com/accountability/political-ethics/do-feds-have-fisa-evidence-bidens-court-records-suggest-maybe
As Sundance has explained many times: the docs that Presidents have are not originals. They are copies.
Further, in today’s digital age, anything DOJ surrendered to Trump, redacted or not, has been digitized and the DOJ has it.
They went to Mar-a-lago assuming Trump had his own unredacted copy and they wanted it so it couldn’t be leaked, but he had a right to it.
.
Exactly.
.
Devon Nunes said there is no actual binder.
Also, memoryholed…
CrowdStrike chief admits no proof that Russia exfiltrated DNC emails
e.g.,
https://itwire.com/business-it-news/security/crowdstrike-chief-admits-no-proof-that-russia-exfiltrated-dnc-emails.html
I think Tucker. com has only been up about a week.
It’s $70+ for a year so he waited until his own platform was up to show the interview.
Makes sense to me.
Sure, because everyone doing something that is deemed so incredibly righteous should absolutely wait until they can make money on it first. Righteous… uh huh,
And it PMO every time I see Mike Pompeo go on some Christian program, saying how his “Faith” makes all the difference. “Depart from me…I never knew you.”
Was reading the Terms of Service on that new Tucker Carlson news site. Stopped reading at this one:
“You voluntarily agree to waive all “moral rights” that you may have in your user content.”
Mr. Carlson wants people to sign away their morals? What the huh?
That’s a thanks, but no thanks, for me Mr. Carlson.
Bessie – it’s not as perverse or bad as it seems. That is a perfectly normal and common waiver in many online user agreements having to do with copyrights. Please read this:
https://edit.tosdr.org/cases/118
Thank you; that was helpful.
In reading the list of firms that also have its users waive their moral rights, with one exception (Facebook) I don’t use any of those sites.
And on Facebook it claims ownership of anything, everything one posts, including photographs of the user or their friends and families or any artwork a user posts to use in any advertisements Facebook wants to create – and they tell people that up front, while all the other sites, especially Tucker’s new site, his goes out of the way to say the User retains their copyright rights – except this one clause seems to say not really.
Definitely helpful information; will have to think about it. Not being a lawyer but having been messed around with by a few, learned word games are their forte, so always see red flags where none may be.
👍
I reckon Tucker withheld the Assange interview until his site/subscription svs etc were up and running.
Seems like a pretty smart/obvious business decision
Begs the question, is Mr. Carlson using Mr. Assange’s situation to make money for his new network or did Mr. Assange think it was a good idea to use his situation to help Mr. Carlson establish a new fee based network. Grifter or compadre? I think I’ve become too jaded after these past few year with grifters and people simply trying to get real news out into the world, so will back away from the internet for a few days to celebrate the birth of the Christ.
Is Assange really the only Wikileaks, etc person that knows?
What is Rohrbacker playing at? Why just that one visit and memo and then nothing is heard from him?
Pompeo actually ran for president? What was he thinking?
Durham comes across as useless as the proverbial hind teat on a boar hog!
They never know who the next Seth Rich will be. Self preservation.
He was useful to those in control.
Asking the right questions
Exactly.
Is TC’s potential role coming into focus?
Time will tell
Not a subscriber. Musk already handed his MAGA list over to the Cabal. Was the full interview any good?
If dirt were dollars,
My brother,
If dirt were dollars,
We’d all be in the black!
Tucker given permission to interview Assange probably a reward for hiding in a bunker during the Mar-a-Lago terror raid.
And we have known since it all went down. The sheeple bought it because they go to the same trough to get fed…and later slaughtered.
But then MAGA knows better.
Assange should have made a tape recording and given it to a trusted person to be released should he be held incommunicado. He should have spilled the story when he could. He knew they were coming for him. Because he did not do so, I am very confused. Had he put any and all information in the public his problems would be less. What reasons could he have to keep mum? were THEY going for his wife and children? probably.
“Yahoo, via Michael Isikoff, puts it this way: “Some senior officials inside the CIA and the Trump administration even discussed killing Assange, going so far as to request “sketches” or “options” for how to assassinate him. Discussions over kidnapping or killing Assange occurred “at the highest levels” of the Trump administration, said a former senior counterintelligence official. “There seemed to be no boundaries.””
But not at the highest level of the Trump administration.
It’s an old trick now. Whenever they want to smear Trump, they blame “Trump officials”. It’s almost always Anti-Trump officials like Fauci, Comey, Wray, etc, etc.
The Founding Fathers are rolling over in their graves saying: “These people are way more evil than King George III”.