If you know the background context, the latest developments in the Seth Rich laptop legal battle could be extremely interesting. However, despite a very favorable court ruling, I caution against too much optimism – the stakes in this ancillary story to the targeting of President Donald Trump are extremely high.
The bottom line of the latest development is that a judge has given the DOJ 14 days to turn over the contents of the laptop belonging to former DNC staffer Seth Rich. There are multiple points of information that point toward Seth Rich having downloaded the DNC email files and shared them with Wikileaks founder Julian Assange.
Seth Rich was killed shortly thereafter in what DC claims was a “botched robbery.”
The reason this story is important will be highlighted below in granular detail. However, within the Time Magazine article about the judge’s ruling the closing statement summarizes the position of the DEEPEST elements of the DC Deep State. NOTE:
…”After his death, Rich was proven to not be the source of any email leaks, with the Mueller Report—also known as the Report on the Investigation into Russian Interference in the 2016 Presidential Election—finding Russian hackers responsible.” (link)
This point, emphasized at the end of the Newsweek article outlining the recent ruling, is the epicenter of the DC narrative. You see, just like the James Wolfe leak of the FISA application to journalist Ali Watkins (hidden by the DOJ/FBI/IC and aligned interests), if the truth of the Trump targeting by the DOJ/FBI and Obama Intelligence community were to surface in the ancillary stories around the Seth Rich issue, it would be the most explosive revelation as to the scale of DC corruption and cover-up.
The Weissmann/Mueller report contains claims that Russia hacked the DNC servers as the central element to the Russia interference narrative in the U.S. election. This DNC hack claim is the fulcrum issue structurally underpinning the Russian election interference narrative pushed by the Weissmann and Muller Special Counsel. However, this essential “hacking” claim was/is directly disputed by WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, as outlined during a previous Dana Rohrabacher interview and by Julian Assange’s own on-the-record statements.
When you overlay the timeline of activity that touches the story of Seth Rich, a DNC staff member who was outraged at the DNC effort to block Bernie Sanders, the potential motive for Seth Rich’s death takes on an entirely different dimension. That said, even people very high up in the Trump administration would be part of the cover up to protect DC from sunlight. No one in Washington DC wants this story to be investigated or told.
Julian Assange was arrested at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London immediately after the Weissmann/Muller report was released to Bill Barr in 2019.
Additionally, despite investigating the background of the Trump-Russia nonsense, John Durham never touched the DNC hacking claim – the core of the Mueller report. Why? The Occam’s razor reason is that Durham knew the U.S. Government threw a bag over Assange to protect the fraudulent Trump-Russia and Russian interference claims.
Again, this reality speaks to the corruption within the John Durham investigation. By claiming he was not authorized to review anything from the Mueller probe, John Durham was protecting Weissmann, Mueller and the core of their justification for a 2-year investigation.
I believe John Durham knew why Assange was eventually arrested. Durham stayed away from it, intentionally.
The Russians HAD TO have made efforts to interfere in the election, or else the factual basis for the surveillance operation against candidate Donald Trump is naked to the world.
That’s why so much DOJ, FBI and Mueller special counsel energy was exhausted framing the predicate.
“Seventeen intelligence agencies,” the December 29th Joint Analysis Report, the expulsion of the Russian diplomats which was an outcropping of the JAR, the rushed January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment, shoving microphones in everyone’s faces and demanding they answer if they believed Russia interfered – all of it, and I do mean every bit of it, is predicated on an absolute DC need to establish that Russia Attempted to Interfere in the 2016 election.
The “Russian Malicious Cyber Activity – Joint Analysis Report” (full pdf) is pure nonsense. It outlines nothing more than vague and disingenuous typical hacking activity that is no more substantive than any other hacking report on any other foreign actor. However, it was needed to help frame the Russian interference narrative.
There were no Russian diplomats involved; there was no Russian election interference; there was no Russian hacking of the DNC; it was all a fraud created by the intelligence community (IC), FBI and Main Justice to support Hillary Clinton’s lies and then cover their own targeting tracks.
Seth Rich was the likely source of the DNC emails. It is possible that Rich was coincidentally killed as a result of a “botched robbery.” However, that possibility diminishes very quickly when you look at the timeline of the Julian Assange arrest. There are just too many coincidences in the timeline to be, well, coincidences.
On September 26, 2021, Yahoo News published an extensive article about the CIA targeting WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange in 2017 and the extreme conversations that were taking place at the highest levels of the U.S. government about how to control him.
There is a much bigger story transparently obvious when overlapped with CTH research files on the Mueller investigation and the U.S. intelligence community. Specifically, the motive intentionally not outlined by Yahoo News in their 2021 obfuscation.
What I am going to share is a deep dive using the resources and timeline from within that Yahoo article, and the specific details we have assembled, that paints a clear picture about what interests existed for the Deep State, the Intelligence apparatus and the Mueller-Weissmann special counsel.
This fully cited review is not for the faint of heart. This is a journey that could shock many; it could alarm more and will likely force more than a few to reevaluate just what the purpose was for Mike Pompeo within the Donald Trump administration.
As the Yahoo News article begins, they outline how those within the Trump administration viewed Assange as a risk in 2017.
Here it is critical to accept that many people inside the Trump administration were there to control events, not to facilitate a policy agenda from a political outsider. In the example of Assange, the information he carried was a risk to those who attempted and failed to stop Trump from winning the 2016 election.
Julian Assange was not a threat to Donald Trump, but he was a threat to those who attempted to stop Donald Trump.
In 2017, the DC system was reacting to a presidency they did not control. As an outcome, the Office of the President was being managed and influenced by some with ulterior motives.
Yahoo, via Michael Isikoff, puts it this way: “Some senior officials inside the CIA and the Trump administration even discussed killing Assange, going so far as to request “sketches” or “options” for how to assassinate him. Discussions over kidnapping or killing Assange occurred “at the highest levels” of the Trump administration, said a former senior counterintelligence official. “There seemed to be no boundaries.”
To understand the risk that Julian Assange represented to FBI/CIA interests, and effectively the Mueller special counsel, it is important to understand just how extensive the operations of the FBI/CIA were in 2016. It is within this network of foreign and domestic operations where FBI Agent Peter Strzok was clearly working as a bridge between the CIA and FBI operations.
By now, people are familiar with the construct of CIA operations involving Joseph Mifsud, a Maltese professor generally identified as a western intelligence operative who was tasked by the FBI/CIA to run an operation against Trump campaign official George Papadopoulos in both Italy (Rome) and London. {Go Deep} John Durham ignored him, and said in testimony after his report that he could not find Mifsud.
In a similar fashion, the FBI tasked U.S. intelligence asset Stefan Halper to target another Trump campaign official, Carter Page. Under the auspices of being a Cambridge Professor, Stefan Halper also targeted General Michael Flynn. Additionally, using assistance from a female FBI agent, under the false name Azra Turk, Halper also targeted Papadopoulos. Again, John Durham ignored it.
The initial operations to target Flynn, Papadopoulos and Page were all based overseas. This seemingly makes the CIA exploitation of the assets and the targets legal and much easier. If Durham went into this intelligence rabbit hole, there would be a paper trail that leads back to Robert Mueller. Durham didn’t go there.
John Durham and IG Michael Horowitz both outlined how very specific exculpatory evidence was known to the FBI and Main Justice, yet that evidence was withheld from the FISA application used against Carter Page and/or it was ignored. The FBI fabricated information in the FISA and removed evidence that Carter Page was previously working for the CIA. This is what FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith was indicted and convicted for doing.
One week after the FBI and DOJ filed the second renewal for the Carter Page FISA [April 7, 2017], Yahoo News notes how Mike Pompeo delivered his first remarks as CIA Director:
[…] On April 13, 2017, wearing a U.S. flag pin on the left lapel of his dark gray suit, Pompeo strode to the podium at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), a Washington think tank, to deliver to a standing-room-only crowd his first public remarks as Trump’s CIA director.
Rather than use the platform to give an overview of global challenges or to lay out any bureaucratic changes he was planning to make at the agency, Pompeo devoted much of his speech to the threat posed by WikiLeaks. (link)
Why would CIA Director Mike Pompeo be so concerned about Julian Assange and Wikileaks in April 2017?
In April of 2017 Pompeo’s boss, President Donald Trump, was under assault from the intelligence community writ large, and every deep state actor was leaking to the media in a frenzied effort to continue the Trump-Russia collusion conspiracy.
The Trump-Russia effort was so all consuming that FBI Director James Comey was even keeping a diary of engagement with President Trump in order to support an ongoing investigation built on fraud – yet Mike Pompeo is worried about Julian Assange.
Again, here it is important to put yourself back into the time of reference. Remember, it’s clear in the text messages between FBI Agent Strzok and Lisa Page that Peter Strzok had a working relationship with what he called their “sister agency”, the CIA.
♦ Former CIA Director John Brennan admitted Peter Strzok helped write the January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) which outlines the Russia narrative; and it was also Peter Strzok who authored the July 31st, 2016, “Electronic Communication” from the CIA to the FBI that originated FBI operation “Crossfire Hurricane.” Strzok immediately used that EC to travel to London to debrief intelligence officials around Australian Ambassador to the U.K. Alexander Downer.
In short, Peter Strzok was a profoundly overzealous James Bond wannabe who acted as a bridge between the CIA and the FBI. The perfect type of FBI career agent for 2016’s CIA Director John Brennan to utilize.
Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson hired CIA Open-Source analyst Nellie Ohr toward the end of 2015, at appropriately the same time as “FBI Contractors” were identified exploiting the NSA database and extracting information on a specific set of U.S. persons. One, if not the primary extractors, was identified as Rodney Joffe at Neustar. “The campaign plot was outlined by Durham in a 27-page indictment charging former Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann with making a false report to the FBI. The plot was also outlined in the finished Durham report. Eight individuals who allegedly conspired with Sussmann but does not identify them by name. The sources familiar with the probe confirmed that the leader of the team of contractors was Rodney L. Joffe.” {Go Deep}
It was also Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson who was domestically tasked with a Russian lobbyist named Natalia Veselnitskaya. A little reported Russian Deputy Attorney General named Saak Albertovich Karapetyan was working as a double agent for the CIA and Kremlin. Karapetyan was directing the foreign operations of Natalia Veselnitskaya, and Glenn Simpson was organizing her inside the U.S as part of his Trump-Russia creation.
Glenn Simpson managed Veselnitskaya through the 2016 Trump Tower meeting with Donald Trump Jr. However, once the CIA/Fusion GPS operation using Veselnitskaya started to unravel with public reporting, back in Russia Deputy AG Karapetyan died in a helicopter crash.
Simultaneously timed in late 2015 through mid 2016, there was a domestic FBI operation using a young Russian named Maria Butina tasked to run up against Republican presidential candidates. According to Patrick Byrne, Butina’s handler, it was FBI agent Peter Strzok giving Byrne the instructions on where to send her. {Go Deep}
All of this context outlines the extent to which the FBI/CIA was openly involved in constructing a political operation that settled upon anyone in candidate Donald Trump’s orbit. A large international operation directed by the FBI/CIA and domestic operations seemingly directed by Peter Strzok operating with a foot in both agencies. [Strzok gets CIA service coin] Durham eviscerated the predicate for all of this in his report, yet stayed away from the part that leads to Robert Mueller in 2017.
Recap: ♦Mifsud tasked against Papadopoulos (CIA). ♦Halper tasked against Flynn (CIA), Page (CIA) and Papadopoulos (CIA). ♦Azra Turk, pretending to be Halper asst, tasked against Papadopoulos (FBI). ♦Veselnitskaya tasked against Donald Trump Jr. (CIA, Fusion GPS). ♦Butina tasked against Trump and Donald Trump Jr (FBI).
Additionally, Christopher Steele was a British intelligence officer hired by Fusion GPS to assemble and launder fraudulent intelligence information within his dossier. And we cannot forget Oleg Deripaska, a Russian oligarch, who was recruited by Asst. FBI Director Andrew McCabe to participate in running an operation against the Trump campaign and create the impression of Russian involvement. Deripaska refused to participate.
All of this engagement directly controlled by U.S. intelligence, and all of this intended to give a specific Russia impression. This predicate was what John Durham was reviewing in November of 2019, and then released in his final report – while whitewashing the parts that led to the Mueller silo.
The key point of all that contextual background is to see how committed the CIA and FBI were to the constructed narrative of Russia interfering with the 2016 election. The CIA, FBI, and by extension the DOJ and a multitude of political operatives, put a hell of a lot of work into it.
We know John Durham looked at the construct of the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA); and talking to CIA analysts who participated in the construct of the January 2017 report that bolstered the false appearance of Russian interference in the 2016 election. This context is important, because it ties in to the next part that involves Julian Assange and Wikileaks. This is where the motives of Mike Pompeo in mid/late 2017 come into play.
[…] By the summer of 2017, the CIA’s proposals were setting off alarm bells at the National Security Council. “WikiLeaks was a complete obsession of Pompeo’s,” said a former Trump administration national security official. (link)
On April 11th, 2019, the Julian Assange indictment was unsealed in the Eastern District of Virginia (EDVA). From the indictment we discover it was under seal since March 6th, 2018:
On Tuesday April 15, 2019, more investigative material was released. Again, note the dates: Grand Jury, *December of 2017* This means FBI investigation prior to….
The FBI investigation took place prior to December 2017, it was coordinated through the Eastern District of Virginia (EDVA) where Dana Boente was U.S. Attorney at the time. The grand jury indictment was sealed from March of 2018 until after Mueller completed his investigation, April 2019.
Why the delay?
What exactly was the DOJ waiting for from March 2018 to April 2019?
This timeframe is the peak of the Robert Mueller/Andrew Weissmann special counsel investigation.
Here’s where it gets interesting….
The Yahoo article outlines, “There was an inappropriate level of attention to Assange“, by the CIA according to a national security council official. However, if you consider the larger ramifications of what Julian Assange represented to all of those people inside and outside government interests who created the Trump-Russia collusion/conspiracy, well, there was actually a serious risk.
Remember, in May 2017 Robert Mueller and Andrew Weissmann effectively took over the DOJ. The purpose of the Mueller investigation was clearly to cover up the illegal operation that took place in the preceding year. The people exposed in the Trump-Russia targeting operation included all of those intelligence operatives previously outlined in the CIA, FBI and DOJ operations. These are the people John Durham did not indict.
The FBI submission to the Eastern District of Virginia Grand Jury in December of 2017 was four months after congressman Dana Rohrabacher talked to Julian Assange in August of 2017: “Assange told a U.S. congressman … he can prove the leaked Democratic Party documents … did not come from Russia.”
(August 2017, The Hill Via John Solomon) Julian Assange told a U.S. congressman on Tuesday he can prove the leaked Democratic Party documents he published during last year’s election did not come from Russia and promised additional helpful information about the leaks in the near future.
Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, a California Republican who is friendly to Russia and chairs an important House subcommittee on Eurasia policy, became the first American congressman to meet with Assange during a three-hour private gathering at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, where the WikiLeaks founder has been holed up for years.
Rohrabacher recounted his conversation with Assange to The Hill.
“Our three-hour meeting covered a wide array of issues, including the WikiLeaks exposure of the DNC [Democratic National Committee] emails during last year’s presidential election,” Rohrabacher said, “Julian emphatically stated that the Russians were not involved in the hacking or disclosure of those emails.”
Pressed for more detail on the source of the documents, Rohrabacher said he had information to share privately with President Trump. (read more)
Dana Rohrabacher later published this account of the events:
Knowing how much effort the CIA and FBI put into the Russia collusion-conspiracy narrative; and knowing that Assange could essentially destroy the baseline predicate for the entire Trump-Russia investigation – which included the use of Robert Mueller; it would make sense for corrupt government officials to take keen interest after this August 2017 meeting between Rohrabacher and Assange.
That contact between Rohrabacher and Assange explains why those same government officials would quickly gather specific evidence (related to Wikileaks and Bradley Manning) for a grand jury by December 2017.
Within three months of the grand jury seating (Nov/Dec 2017), the DOJ generated an indictment and sealed it in March 2018. The indictment remained sealed until the Mueller probe was complete. This is not accidental timing.
The EDVA sat on the Julian Assange indictment while the Mueller/Weissman probe was ongoing.
As soon as the Mueller probe ended, on April 11th, 2019, a planned and coordinated effort between the U.K. and U.S. was executed; Julian Assange was forcibly arrested and removed from the Ecuadorian embassy in London, and the EDVA indictment was unsealed (link).
As a person who researched this fiasco, including the ridiculously false 2016 Russian hacking/interference narrative: “17 intelligence agencies”, Joint Analysis Report (JAR) needed for Obama’s anti-Russia narrative in December ’16, and then a month later the ridiculously political Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) in January ’17, this timing against Assange is not coincidental.
It doesn’t take a deep researcher to see the aligned Deep State motive to control Julian Assange, because the Mueller report was dependent on Russia cybercrimes, and that narrative is contingent on the Russia DNC hack story which Julian Assange disputes. Again, John Durham stayed away from it!
♦ This is critical. The Weissmann/Mueller report contains claims that Russia hacked the DNC servers as the central element to the Russia interference narrative in the U.S. election.
This claim is the fulcrum underpinning the Russia election interference narrative. However, this core and essential claim is directly disputed by Julian Assange, as outlined during the Dana Rohrabacher interview, and by Julian Assange’s on-the-record statements.
The predicate for Robert Mueller’s investigation was specifically due to Russian interference in the 2016 election.
The fulcrum for this Russia interference claim is the intelligence community assessment (Peter Strzok); and the only factual evidence claimed within the ICA is that Russia hacked the DNC servers; a claim only made possible by relying on forensic computer analysis from another Michael Sussmann partner, Shawn Henry at Crowdstrike, yes another DNC contractor and collaborator with the Clinton campaign.
The CIA held a massive conflict of self-interest problem surrounding the Russian hacking claim as it pertained to their own activity in 2016. The FBI and DOJ always held a massive interest in maintaining the Russian hacking claim. Robert Mueller and Andrew Weismann did everything they could to support that predicate; and all of those foreign countries whose intelligence apparatus participated with Brennan and Strzok also carried a self-interest in maintaining that Russia hacking and interference narrative.
Julian Assange was/is the only person with direct knowledge of how Wikileaks gained custody of the DNC emails; and Assange claimed he has evidence it was from an inside DNC leak, not from a DNC hack.
The Russian “hacking” claim was ultimately so important to the CIA, FBI, DOJ, ODNI and U.K Intelligence apparatus. Well, right there is the obvious motive to shut Assange down as soon as intelligence officials knew the Mueller report was going to be public. And that is exactly what Main Justice and the U.S. intelligence community did.
This is why John Durham never touched it.
All of them know what happened.
All of them know why Julian Assange was taken from the Embassy in London. A bag had to be thrown over Assange in order to retain the justification for the Weissmann/Mueller special counsel and the larger Russian election interference claims. None of the key players did not know this. They all know.
Start asking the right questions about the timeline of Assange being arrested. Ask about the DNC hack and Russian provenance according to Crowdstrike. Ask key and specific questions about the FBI working with Crowdstrike and about the DOJ and EDVA case against Assange.
DNC staffer Seth Rich likely downloaded the DNC emails then leaked them to Julian Assange. Seth Rich was killed under very suspicous circumstances and then Julian Assange was arrested on the day after Mueller’s report was released claiming the DNC email leak was from a Russian hack.
The Russians never hacked the DNC.
The people around the Deep State all know what happened. SO DO WE!
If the Seth Rich laptop has the evidence of how he transferred those DNC files, every single interest in Washington DC will be in alignment against that explosive discovery.
Seth was Epsteined.
Epstein was Sethed.
I expect to see anything out of Seth Rich’s computer right about the same time they release the Epstein client lists… They’ve already coined the phrase “too big to fail”… Thats their outlook on all of this activity. They will protect it and the swamp at ALL costs.. Im always figured Assange had some fail safes in case of his suicide,but at this point, im guessing the 3 letter boys have eradicated their existence. They got to Seth Rich’s family pretty quickly.
The contents on Hunter Biden’s laptop has been exposed and what
were the repercussions over that ? Zilch!
How about Weiner’s laptop? Seems some cops who got a peek at that sucker ended up suicided.
No one is holding the perverted oligarchs accountable. At least after a century most of them do move on. They just take their sweet time doing it. Are you listening Mr. Soros? McCain and Henry K. are calling you.
“This fully cited review is not for the faint of heart. This is a journey that could shock many; it could alarm more and will likely force more than a few to reevaluate just what the purpose was for Mike Pompeo within the Donald Trump administration.”
I missed it so will someone please inform me what the article states/indicates was the purpose for Mike Pompeo within the Donald Trump administration?
Pompeo is a FILTHY Traitor, covering up for his Master’s, Mr Global, whomever he is. Pompeo is a lying SCUMBAG, like most of Congress
IMO, simply to protect the status quo.
He was the internal eye and ear for the Uniparty.
A Plant. So was Pence. So was – ….umm, how long shall we play this game? 🙂
It has been a long time since I’ve paid much attention to the Seth Rich matter, but as I understand matters, on the question of Rich being targeted, the timelines don’t match up–the DNC didn’t become aware of the stolen e-mails until after Rich had been killed.
At the time of the murder, the supposed motive–to silence Rich–didn’t exist, because no one yet knew that there was anything to silence him for. Thus, it is very unlikely that his death had anything to do with whatever role he might have had in the leaks.
Maybe the DNC didn’t know about Seth Rich but somebody in the DNC did and they had him killed to stop the truth coming out. Whoever it was, and names have been suggested, were scared stiff. It is obviously bigger than everyone imagined and they will eventually be exposed.
Buh-loan-knee
Please check this because I remember that Mr podesta was reported to have said in email that the leaker should be dealt with as a lesson to others and so the hack was already known by the big wigs at dnc before mr rich was murdered. I am pretty sure that the hack was known much before the murder of mr rich. Just another of the uninvestigated unexplored actions of someone from the dnc whose statements should have made him if not a prime suspect at least a person who should have been investigated in the murder of mr rich. Just another of the unexplored actions of the huge criminal enterprise that is the dnc.
That laptop’s hard drive has been erased and reinstalled so many times that its BIOS is begging for it to stop.
I wonder where the laptop backup is?
Whistleblower Testimony – Seth Rich Murder
Lin Wood interviewed whistleblower Ryan Dark White in early 2021. The testimony says that Rod Rosenstein directed DEA agent Joseph Rosati to steal a flash drive from Seth Rich. Rosati employed two MS-13 thugs to get it off of Rich late one night. The scene went down badly and they killed Rich.
Here is the pdf link of this interview: See page 76 for specifics of the Seth Rich incident.
https://populist.press/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/FULL-Transcript-of-Whistleblower-Interview.pdf
Since the question of Lin Wood credibility has come up, I want to share another source of information that might corroborate the testimony of Ryan Dark White. It seems that this other information from a person known as Neon Revolt, actually identifies the two MS-13 guys that were killed at Myrtle Beach on July 11, 2016.
Again, consider this information and decide for yourself what is true. Note that I cannot recall that Sundance has ever commented on any of these documents. This second set does not appear to have anything to do with Lin Wood.
Link to Neon Revolt article parts 1-2-3:
https://www.neonrevolt.com/2021/01/06/at-the-highest-levels-part-1-of-3/
https://www.neonrevolt.com/2021/01/06/at-the-highest-levels-part-2-of-3/
https://www.neonrevolt.com/2021/01/06/at-the-highest-levels-part-3-of-3/
Ryan Dark White,RIP, was mendacious in all his interviews, affidavits, tweets examined.
His messages and (false) testimonies and tall tales appealed to myself and so it seemed, several established treepers.
I did a deep dive to check him out. It was bad.
He was feeding us what we wished to be true … that he was a whistleblower with shocking accounts of wicked, depraved, corrupt, & sexual crimes and coverups of the Judge that was going after General Flynn and others, including J. Biden, and Rosenstein.
He even was a whistleblower for Seth Rich murder.
He was all things to all MAGA warriors.
He worked in a porn shop.
He claimed to be a particle physicist developing weapons and discovering such outrageous effects that the gov’t persecutes him to keep his mouth shut.
He was a plant… a Ray Epps like gov’t asset. A chaos agent directed at MAGA.
He dropped his guard in a long interview with some young naive hosts who where eating up his physicist act. All bs.
Hard to believe that Lin Wood accepted his bona fides.
Was he also the one who accused Chief Justice Roberts & Pence of pedo crimes? Lin Wood also promoted that for awhile, based upon a “whistleblower.”
As for Pence, see pdf page 17 of the Lin Wood interview transcript. It seems like Ryan Dark White is suggesting that Pence is a pedophile, but said in an indirect manner.
As for Roberts, it is also suggested that he is compromised in terms of children. See pdf page 16 of the transcript. On pdf page 56 White says that Roberts is gay.
This Lin Wood interview and the Ryan Dark White testimony may not be completely true in all its statements of fact. But it paints a picture of the sordid world that is the DC, Maryland, and Northern Virginia areas and how the DEA, DOJ/FBI, and courts are corrupt and how some of these people operate. While some parts of White’s testimony may be distorted or exaggerated, he still portrays a world in which blackmail, murder, and extortion are the tools of the powerful. I don’t think anyone could make a narrative like this up unless they were there and had some direct experience with some of these people.
It is not necessary to believe that Seth Rich was killed for leaking to make this important. He may have been but DC is enough of a sh1thole to make the official story plausible. The important part is that it was a leak rather than a hack by the Russians. The DNC clearly did rig the primary which provides a motive for a Berniebro like Rich.
Check the DC murder statistics. Go back as far as you want. Seth Rich murder was singular. It was unique.. Unprecedented. You know why?
Right. And that makes the official story not so plausible … at all.
I have always thought that Seth was not killed for what he did release, but for what he hadn’t yet released.
There were a lot of idealistic young men who thought they had found, in Bernie, someone who finally noticed them. They got enraged at Bernie’s treatment, but Bernie did not.
Someone reassemble the reportage from the first 72 hours after Seth Rich’s homicide. The blogs at the time and comments are perhaps impossible to find now. People are disagreeing on the facts that were knowable at the time, but which have been lost.
Scrubbed. As someone once said, “archive offline”
Nothing revealing will be on the laptop. The FBI has been in possession of it for 7 years.
There is a Congressional Labradoodle in Florida who was shagging a Pakistani IT Team, she had them hit Seth.
Noodle Head! 😀
I’ve always kept that possibility in mind as all this occurred at the same time. Everyone has forgotten about the Awan brothers selling information.
Here’s the COMPLETE LIST of the 30 Democrats Who Hired the Criminal Awan Brothers for IT Services | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
I haven’t forgotten. The bros went back to Pakistan and the whole incident was buried. Everything is buried and more 💩 just keeps getting shoveled on top.
It’s a Republican operation touted as a Pelosi witch hunt. The Republican Party is bloody with murderous corruptocrats and they’ll stop at nothing to prevent exposure. Why we are supporting DT running in that vile organization is beyond me. How many more names and faces do we need to reprove it? I give up… I can’t continue to foster hope in more of the hopeful “R majority” canard. We do NOT HAVE REPRESENTATION. Matt G and a handful of others need to escape. The rest can die in the fallout.
FBI paid contractors.
“The Russians never hacked the DNC.”
And January 6th was never an Insurrection. The two lies bookend volumes of false narrative fabricated by a branch of government hidden beneath the awares’ of most Americans. Its last chapters, if they be written true, will be written in the blood of a nation’s patriots, citizens who have been snared, entrapped in the briar patch of deceit set by the ‘Parties’ that be.
Seth Rich and Ashli Babbitt were two lives cradling the period of the two elections of Donald Trump—one to his Presidency and one to his Presidency in exile. Donald Trump’s ascendency initiated the ‘great awakening’ to the rotten two-tier system of justice—the real entity imposing its will on patriots in the name of social injustice—‘wokeness.’
They like to promote “Big Lie” as election denial but there used to be 3 actual Big Lies:
1 – Russian Collusion / Mueller b.s.
2 – Corona
3 – Election Fraud ’20
We had to add more Big Lies:
4 – J6 b.s.
5 – Let’s throw in Impeachment #1 & #2 as corollaries
6 – Let’s hope the Seth Rich Lie can grow, but they’ll probably use it as “nothing to see here, this laptop is blank” – “See, it’s now DEBUNKED! So shut up all you MAGA Freaks”
Justice for Seth Rich! Justice for the Republic! All the evil players from small to big can burn in Hell for All eternity…
After all this time, it occurs to me that Assange should have just spilled the beans as to where he got the information. On one hand, his silence may be viewed as an ethical protection of his source. On the other hand, his silence has foreclosed an avenue of investigation that could long ago have exposed and detonated the Deep Satan narrative that undergirded the entire cockamamie Trump-Russia narrative.
Why has Assange suffered and allowed the perpetrators to skate for all these years? Something more is going on than even the most convoluted conspiracy theories cannot explain.
Remember the Dutch TV interview (in english) with Julian Assange.
He says A State Actor was not the source of the documents.
Then near end of show he announces that Wikileaks will pay a cash reward for information on the killers of Seth Rich.
The interviewer’s jaw drops & eyes bug out in astonishment. Then he asks .,. are you saying that Seth Rich is the source of DNC emails?
Julian says wikileaks does not reveal sources.
Then why offer the Seth Rich reward?
Julian says often our sources provide info at great personal risk. Wikileaks supports our sources.
So, in essence he did spill the beans …. it is just, as so often the case these times …. nothing came out of tbe revelation.
ergo election cheating.
Yes, it was always just “hint, hint, wink, wink, tease, tease” but never actually direct statements. Perhaps understandable at the time due to legal entanglements / extradition etc – but the guy has suffered, tortured?, drugged? for SEVEN FREAKING YEARS – what’s the literal point anymore?
And Kim Dot Com also implied that Seth Rich was the source, who used KDC’s other background “whistleblower secure server” business as a conduit to get SR’s files from the flash stick to WL – he also, amazingly, had his own legal entanglements to deal with, and thus could never make direct statements but only hint, wink, tease, and imply.
It’s simple to collapse this house of cards on the DNC email leaks: a national security letter to google on John Podesta’s email account asking if it’s 2FA was turned on at the time of his phishing incident. If it was, he wasn’t hacked – phished or not. The whole ball of lies unravels through forced testimony or perjury on the stand over what really went down inside the HRC campaign.
“Yahoo, via Michael Isikoff, puts it this way: ‘Some senior officials inside the CIA and the Trump administration even discussed killing Assange, going so far as to request “sketches” or “options” for how to assassinate him. Discussions over kidnapping or killing Assange occurred “at the highest levels” of the Trump administration, said a former senior counterintelligence official. “There seemed to be no boundaries.'”
“The Trump administration” = Trump, personally, when the need arises.
We kept waiting for Trump to pardon or offer immunity to Julian, in order to get to the truth about the Russian Hacker baloney.
What did Hillary say about those nooses?
Favorable ruling. But come on, seriously? They’ve had 7+ YEARS to diddle with that laptop. Ugh.
” No one in Washington DC wants this story to be investigated or told.”
This is exactly the reason it MUST be investigated and told.
Why do I think the info on that laptop is going to be “too corrupted” to be of use? ( Or something similar.)
At this point the FBI has had that computer (which they denied for years) since 2016. There’s no way – assuming the data exists – that is going to be let out just because some judge says so. We are so far past that point.
The police report says that when they arrived on scene, Seth was conscious and talking. I don’t know about usual procedure but I figure the officers would ask, “Who shot you?”
A witness blocks away reported 2 young black men running in the opposite direction.
Now, I’m not black or young, but if I saw a Federal Agent gun down Seth Rich, I’d run, too.
These young men have never come forward to witness since it is obvious the government would pin the murder on them.
Thanks Sundance, maybe one of these days a very detailed time line can be made of all the events that happened in the framing of President Trump. Perhaps we can start at the beginning which is actually the minute presidential candidate Donald J Trump stepped on that escalator at Trump Tower but for sake of discussion we can start with a low level former member of the foreign policy advisory panel to Donald Trump‘s 2016 presidential campaign George Papadopoulos and a chance meeting with a Maltese professor Joseph Mifsud in mid March of 2016. If I remember correctly that’s when it became very clear that Trump would be the Republican nominee.
Now admittedly I stopped paying attention to the fairy tale shortly after Barr and Durham made their trip to Rome. I was extremely disappointed when there was no further news of a Mifsud cell phone being recovered which IMHO would have proven that Mifsud worked for western intel and was not a Russian asset.
It was at that very moment I lost all hope of the truth being exposed and realized that not only was Mueller a clean up guy for the globalist Obama admin but Durham was as well along with Barr being a protector of the swamp.
Along with the missing Mifsud cell phone is Mifsud himself. Where is he at ?
Other notables would be how in the heck does a low level Trump campaign member just happen to run into an Australian former politician and diplomat who was leader of the Liberal Party from 1994 to 1995 Alexander Downer who had major ties to Bill and Hillary Clinton ? I suppose its just all a coincidence that it happened right after Mifsud told Papadopoulos that the Russians allegedly had dirt on Hillary Clinton, SMH
Also, where is the DNC computer / hard drives/ servers ? What did Crowdstrike do with them after they “analyzed” them ? Did they end up in Ukraine ? Why wasn’t the FBI allowed to look at them ?
I have many more question about the Russia Trump collusion fairy tale but here is something I have been wondering for a while now. Why didn’t the Clinton campaign simply blow off the leaked emails as Russian misinformation / disinformation ? I mean it worked well enough for the Biden campaign or at least long enough to get Crooked Joe installed. They could have held onto the Russia interfering in the 2016 election narrative and could have found another way to dirty Trump up with the Russians. Did they get greedy ? or was it that they never thought President Trump would be elected and the whole mess would be swept under the rug ?
Thanks again Sundance and to all my fellow Treepers and folks that might be diving in this rabbit hole reading about the biggest political crimes in the history of the world for the very first time PLEASE REMEMBER THESE TWO THINGS. Mifsud was not a Russian asset and the DNC was not hacked by the Russians. If anyone tells you different they are lying to you.
Okay, Okay, I read thru 15 -20 comments. What I want to know is how Seth Rich’s laptop connects to Pizzagate? Will that come out in the Court investigation?
Everybody remember Debbie Wasserman hired the Mexican Gang member to do the hit then he was killed the next week in “gang violence”?
Arkancide … obviously.
Reading this article and the associated timeline is like exhuming a putrifying corpse. The closer you get to the object of interest, the more it stinks and this is one of the most horrid and putrid messes I have witnessed in my lifetime. Makes the Kennedy assassination look like childs play by comparison. Is anyone of these government participants not a horrible person or basically borderline personality disorder?
Botched robbery my rosey red rottweiler.
Tucker Carlson must have known about the Seth Rich – Assange connection, or at least that Assange had direct knowledge of who did the leaking, when he went to interview Assange. I can’t believe he didn’t bring it up.
Yet he has had little to say about it. Why?
Perhaps he or his family have been threatened in some way. Maybe he’s just waiting for the right time to achieve maximum impact, say, when the inevitable first Trump conviction comes down.
One can only hope he is going to reveal what happened in a timely manner.
I love you our analysis every time I read it, I understand more deeply.
Russia military Intelligence hacked the DNC. Hacked a lot of other stuff as well, including other political parties. It’s their job, and they continue to do it. Just as every other intelligence apparatus around the world does. They wouldn’t be a very effective intelligence service if they could not complete one of the simplest tasks assigned to any intelligence outfit, collection. For example:
The hack occurred on May 28 and May 29, 2023, and was classified as a major incident.
‘https://www.forbes.com/sites/tylerroush/2023/10/30/russian-hackers-breached-632000-doj-and-pentagon-email-addresses-in-massive-moveit-cyberattack-report-says/
CVE-2023-34362 was disclosed two days later…
https://community.progress.com/s/article/MOVEit-Transfer-Critical-Vulnerability-31May2023
Doing something with the intelligence is the far harder job. Most struggle with this step, as it involves dealing with the untrained and undisciplined.
Former KGB agents like Vladimir Putin at least understand how difficult it is to get politicians and senior administration bureaucrats to appreciate the importance of briefings and assessments. Not that Putin listens to his own intelligence agencies, but he does appreciate how to exploit this.
Information does not exist in a vacuum, at least in a human environment, which is complicated by all the strange quirks human beings possess.
Both sides of the political aisle had plenty of specific warnings well before the 2016 election, that they were going to get their behinds handed to them by the Russian government’s intelligence services – plural. Each individual, including some of those now negotiating with prosecutors, had advanced prior warning they were the targets of Russian influence operations.
A little personal responsibility from both political parties, and better information security would be a good first step, neither of which has been particularity impressive. The lawyers amongst them should have a least a little more sense. They were also warned.
The DNC did not notice APT28 and APT29 were in their network until April 28, 2016.
By July 27, 2015 Russian intelligence already had access to the DNC, and the same year hacked the German Bundestag…
https://netzpolitik.org/2015/digital-attack-on-german-parliament-investigative-report-on-the-hack-of-the-left-party-infrastructure-in-bundestag/
It does not help that the media often seem to get confused when reporting on Russian intelligence operations, the different departments and the different cyber actors. A lack of common naming conventions by private security companies probably does not help.
I have known Assange since he was a little kid, and he is not the greatest hacker or easiest person to get along with. He is human, fallible and was put in a very difficult position, caught between two warring political factions, and multiple internationally reaching government agencies from more than just a few nations. Managing to annoy most of them is quite an accomplishment, but that also left him in a very precarious situation. He was warned that he was going to get honey trapped, but the stuff he and others have said about Guccifer is crap. It was a GRU op.
Hackers also take claim frequently for actions they did not carry out, often using an alias, while offering the flimsiest of evidence. Not that some private security companies out there are too crash hot themselves sometimes, though some are much better than others. Often people ‘jump-the-gun’, including people working in the media, making unsubstantiated claims. The government are also difficult f***s to deal with, and will indeed suppress intelligence that might show they failed to act – well after they were given very clear warnings and a s*** load of intelligence.
However targeting someone reporting on the government, and leaving them to rot in an embassy, and then a prison for years, for your own screw ups is weak. Both the Republicans and Democrats should be ashamed of themselves, along with those British f***s.
Julian also gave those clowns at the DNC a ‘heads up’ their emails had been hacked, before they were leaked. Not that the Republicans didn’t hang him out to dry also…
“This is the first time that President Donald Trump’s Justice Department has filed official charges against members of a Russian government agency for taking actions intended to influence the outcome of the 2016 presidential campaign…”
https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2018/07/from-bitly-to-x-agent-how-gru-hackers-targeted-the-2016-presidential-election/
The certificates from the GRU’s hack and leak operation are easily identifiable, along with their command and control infrastructure. Though these days they often take a little more precaution to not leave quite as much evidence behind.
In the old days they used to often leave an actual corpse and their calling card. Take your pick of APT28 pseudonyms…
“Their choices of targets and the use of SEDNIT malware indicate the attackers are very experienced; SEDNIT has been designed to penetrate their targets’ defenses and remain persistent in order to capture as much information as they can.”
https://www.trendmicro.com/en_us/research/14/j/operation-pawn-storm-the-red-in-sednit.html
If you would like more information this following report has a good outline:
‘http://pwc.blogs.com/cyber_security_updates/2014/12/apt28-sofacy-so-funny.html
Thank you for your efforts.