Operation Condor – How NSA Director Mike Rogers Saved The U.S. From a Massive Constitutional Crisis…

This outline is the story of how the FBI Counterintelligence Division and DOJ National Security Division were weaponized. This outline is the full story of what House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes is currently working to expose.  This outline exposes the biggest political scandal in U.S. history.  This outline is also the story of how one man’s action likely saved our constitutional republic.

His name is Admiral Mike Rogers.

I’m calling the back-story to the 2016 FISA 702(16)(17) political corruption by the Obama administration “Operation Condor”.  Those of you familiar with the film “Three Days of The Condor” will note how the real life storyline almost mirrors the Hollywood film. For the real life version, NSA Director Admiral Mike Rogers plays the role of “Condor”.

“SCIF” – a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility. To understand the larger FISA 702(16)(17) issues in 2016 it is important to focus on the word “compartmented”.

Intelligence information is housed by compartments within the larger intelligence community network. Each intelligence unit holds intelligence unique to that compartment and task. The FBI Counterintelligence unit would hold the intelligence information specific to their task or assignment; the DOJ National Security Division would hold their own compartmented intelligence; again, specific to their task and objectives. So too would the DOJ, DoD (Pentagon), State Dept., or CIA.

This compartmented structure is what led to the creation of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, ODNI. The 911 commission recommended the office to serve as a hub able to ensure intelligence sharing; that is – to ensure intelligence was not intentionally withheld from other compartments when needed.

In 2016 the ODNI for President Obama was James Clapper.

It is doubtful the 911 commission ever gave thought to what might happen when intelligence is weaponized as a political tool. The DNI is a political appointment, a cabinet member, of the President.  If the executive branch, the President, wanted to weaponize intelligence as a political tool, he/she would have control over such weaponization as an outcome of their political appointees within the: FBI (Comey, McCabe), DOJ (Lynch/Yates), CIA (Brennan), DNI (Clapper), or DoD (Ash Carter), etc.

The civilian (representative) oversight into the compartmented intelligence falls to a very select group known as the Intelligence Gang of Eight.

Four Democrats and Four Republicans (four minority party and four majority party political leaders) for a total of eight. Four from the House and Four from the Senate. –Understand the Gang of Eight Here– The Gang-of-Eight can, if they choose, interact with the intelligence product with the same level of security clearance as the compartment being reviewed.

Only these eight members can interact with the intelligence product in this way. This ensures their ability to conduct oversight.

It is critical to understand the difference between the House Intelligence Committee, the Senate Intelligence Committee and the Gang of Eight. Only two members from the House Intelligence Committee (chair and minority), and two members of the Senate Intelligence Committee (chair and vice-chair) are participants. The other four are Speaker of the House, minority leader of House, Leader of Senate and Minority leader of Senate. The latter four are not part of any other intel committee.

On March 20th 2017 congressional testimony, James Comey was asked why the FBI Director did not inform congressional oversight about the counterintelligence operation that began in July 2016.

FBI Director Comey said he did not tell congressional oversight he was investigating presidential candidate Donald Trump because the Director of Counterintelligence suggested he not do so. *Very important detail.*

I cannot emphasize this enough. *VERY* important detail. Again, notice how Comey doesn’t use FBI Counterintelligence Director WH “Bill” Priestap’s actual name, but refers to his position and title. Again, watch the first three minutes:


FBI Director James Comey was caught entirely off guard by that first three minutes of that questioning. He simply didn’t anticipate it.

Oversight protocol requires the FBI Director to tell the congressional intelligence “Gang of Eight” of any counterintelligence operations. The Go8 has oversight into these ops at the highest level of classification. In July 2016 the time the operation began, oversight was the responsibility of this group, the Gang of Eight:

Obviously, based on what we have learned since March 2017, and what has surfaced recently, we can all see why the FBI would want to keep it hidden that they were running a counterintelligence operation against a presidential candidate. After all, as FBI Agent Peter Strzok said it in his text messages, it was an “insurance policy”.

REMINDER – FBI Agent Strzok to FBI Attorney Page:

“I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office that there’s no way he gets elected – but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk. It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40.”

FBI Director James Comey told congress on March 20th, 2017, the reason he didn’t inform the statutory oversight “Gang of Eight” was because Bill Priestap (Director of Counterintelligence) recommended he didn’t do it.

The originating intelligence agency agency, in these examples the DOJ National Security Division and/or FBI Counterintelligence Division, holds the proprietary intelligence they create in their SCIF.  They may also receive intelligence products created for them, which they will also host in their unique SCIF. Thus, intelligence is compartmentalized.

In 2015 Sally Yates blocked any inspector general oversight of the DOJ National Security Division (SEE Pdf HERE).  The Office of Inspector General. Michael Horowitz, requested oversight over the DOJ National Security Division and it was Sally Yates who responded with a lengthy 58-page legal explanation saying, essentially, ‘nope – not allowed.’ (PDF HERE) All of the DOJ is subject to oversight, except the NSD.

The White House -the executive branch- is also a host of intelligence information and consequently the White House has their own SCIF which holds intelligence products they would create (very little), or intelligence products created for them (the vast majority).

An example of a product created for the executive branch would be the President’s Daily Briefing (PDB).

The PDB as a whole product would only exist in the White House SCIF. Parts of the PDB would be hosted by the originating participant, ex. NSA, FBI, DOJ, DoD, CIA State Dept. etc., but only the White House would have the fully assembled product. After all, it’s assembled for the President.

Putting the “Oversight” structure together with the “Compartmented” intelligence security you will note that only a few people ‘could’ traditionally access the full PDB.  However, under President Obama the President’s Daily Brief went to almost everyone at top levels in his administration.  Regarding the Obama PDB:

[…]  But while through most of its history the document has been marked “For the President’s Eyes Only,” the PDB has never gone to the president alone. The most restricted dissemination was in the early 1970s, when the book went only to President Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger, who was dual-hatted as national security adviser and secretary of state.

In other administrations, the circle of readers has also included the vice president, the secretary of defense and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, along with additional White House staffers.

By 2013, Obama’s PDB was making its way to more than 30 recipients, including the president’s top strategic communications aide and speechwriter, and deputy secretaries of national security departments. (link)

Pay attention to that last part.  According to the Washington Post outline Obama’s PDB’s were going to more than 30 recipients including: “Deputy Secretaries of national security departments”.

During an MSNBC interview about her unmasking U.S. citizens within intelligence reports, in April 2017, President Obama’s National Security Adviser, Susan Rice, defined the Obama national security departments to include: “State” – “Defense” (Pentagon includes NSA) and “CIA”….

So under President Obama’s watch Deputy Asst. Secretaries of Defense had daily access to the PDB.  An example of an Obama Deputy Asst. Secretary of Defense, Evelyn Farkas.

With dozens of people having access to President Obama’s PDB, Rice’s unmasking of names within the intelligence product gave dozens of people direct access to unmasked intelligence – including Obama officials who could, likely did, use the PDB for specific and intentional political purposes.  This political outcome was essentially confirmed by Evelyn Farkas who was one of the downstream recipients of the unmasked intelligence.

If the House Intelligence Committee, or Senate Intelligence Committee, as a whole – wanted to see the President’s Daily Briefing, they would have to request the individual components from the individual intelligence agencies because the PDB product was not created for them; it was created for the Office of The President.

Only the Chairman and Minority leader from each Intel committee could go to the White House to see the PDB end product. [Remember, they alone are four of the Gang-of-Eight.]

This is why Devin Nunes, who is a Go8 member, has to request the intelligence from each department (NSA, DOJ, FBI etc.) in order to share it with the oversight committee. Nunes can review the ‘executive SCIF product’ but cannot export or import intelligence product he did not create.

The Congressional SCIF would then hold the compartmented information after delivery for the committee members to review under very tight controls. The intelligence is removed/deleted after review. No systems are connected.

Our research indicates that in February and March 2017 Chairman Devin Nunes, a gang of eight member, reviewed intelligence reports (most likely PDB’s) that were assembled exclusively for the office of the former President (Obama). That is why he went to the Eisenhower Executive Office Building (EEOB) Information Facility to review.

The intelligence product would be delivered to that SCIF system for his review, most likely by the ODNI (Dan Coats) or NSA (Mike Rogers).   It would be removed from that SCIF system after Nunes review, (no systems are connected).  It is important to note here that President Trump nominated Senator Dan Coats as ODNI on January 5th, 2017 – however, Democrats held up that nomination until March 16th, 2017.

It is not coincidental that immediately following DNI Dan Coat’s ability to provide that information Chairman Devin Nunes first reported his concerns. After Devin Nunes review the information March 22nd 2017, Nunes stated the intelligence product he reviewed was “not related to Russia, or the FBI Russian counter-intelligence investigation”.

House Intelligence Committee Chairman, Devin Nunes, then held a brief press conference  and stated he has been provided intelligence reports brought to him by unnamed sources that include ‘significant information’ about President-Elect Trump and his transition team.


1.) …”On numerous occasions the [Obama] intelligence community incidentally collected information about U.S. citizens involved in the Trump transition.”

2.)  “Details about U.S. persons associated with the incoming administration; details with little or no apparent foreign intelligence value were widely disseminated in intelligence community reporting.”

3.) “Third, I have confirmed that additional names of Trump transition members were unmasked.”

4.) “Fourth and finally, I want to be clear; none of this surveillance was related to Russia, or the investigation of Russian activities.

“The House Intelligence Committee will thoroughly investigate surveillance and its subsequent dissemination, to determine a few things here that I want to read off:”

•“Who was aware of it?”

•“Why it was not disclosed to congress?”

•“Who requested and authorized the additional unmasking?”

•“Whether anyone directed the intelligence community to focus on Trump associates?”

•“And whether any laws, regulations or procedures were violated?”

“I have asked the Directors of the FBI, NSA and CIA to expeditiously comply with my March 15th (2017) letter -that you all received a couple of weeks ago- and to provide a full account of these surveillance activities.”

Again, this is why the intelligence reports seem likely to have been political opposition research -that was part of Obama’s PDB– unless it was a separate intelligence product, apart from the PDB, which was created for the Office of the President.  [I view the latter as highly doubtful because it would be too risky for the President to be asking for specific ‘stand alone’ intelligence against political adversaries, ie candidate Donald Trump.]

…Here’s where all the dots connect:

Fast forward to 2018 – Aside from the larger Russian conspiracy narrative, up to now the controversial media story has been around the origin of the 2016 FISA warrant(s).

As previously stated by all reporting there was a June 2016 FISA application that was denied, and an October 2016 application that was approved.  The current line of congressional inquiry surrounds the underlying content of the requested FISA warrant, and whether it was built upon fraud and manipulated content (the ‘Steele Dossier’) presented to the FISA Court (FISC).

Recently the media have been working frantically, against an entire year of prior support for the Steele Dossier, to distance the origin of the FBI counterintelligence operation from the dossier.   The reason why reveals the bigger underlying story.

When Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes explained his concern in March 2017 about what he saw from a review of 2016 intelligence gathering, reporting and subsequent unmasking, the issue behind his concern was clouded in mystery. Indeed the larger headlines at the time were about demanding a special prosecutor and driving the Russia conspiracy narrative.

In hindsight, and with information from our assembled timelines of 2016 though today, we can now revisit that concern expressed by Chairman Nunes with a great deal more perspective and information. Understanding the latest information will help us all understand the totality of Nunes original frame of reference.

As many of you are aware, immediately following the 2016 presidential election NSA Director Admiral Mike Rogers traveled to Trump Tower to meet with president-elect Donald Trump. The day AFTER the Rogers visit, President-elect Trump moved his transition team out of Trump Tower to Bedminister New Jersey.

We always suspected NSA Director Rogers gave President-elect Trump a head’s up of sorts.

Later, during the December 2016 and Jan, Feb, March, April 2017 Russian Conspiracy frenzy, when the entire intelligence community seemed to be collectively leaking against Trump’s interests, those suspicions gained even greater likelihood. However, what we learned in 2017 about the activity in 2016 almost guarantees that was exactly what happened. That back-story also ties into both the FISA issue and the Devin Nunes concern.

Admiral Mike Rogers became NSA director in April 2014.

Sometime in early 2016 Admiral Rogers became aware of “ongoing” and “intentional” violations of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), Section 702 surveillance. Specifically item #17 which includes the unauthorized upstream data collection of U.S. individuals within NSA surveillance.

Section 702 – Item #17 “About Queries” is specifically the collection of emails, and phone call surveillance of U.S. persons.

The public doesn’t discover this issue, and NSA Director Rogers action, until May 2017 when we learn that Rogers told the FISA court he became aware of unlawful surveillance and collection of U.S. persons. Put into context, with the full back-story, it appears that 2016 surveillance was the political surveillance now in the headlines; the stuff Chairman Nunes is currently questioning.

The dates here are important as they tell a story.

As a result of Rogers suspecting [FISA 702 (#17 – email and phone calls)] surveillance activity was being used for reasons he deemed unlawful, in mid 2016 Rogers ordered the NSA compliance officer to run a full audit on 702 NSA compliance.

Again, 702 is basically spying on Americans; the actual “spying” part is 702. Item 17 is “About Queries“, which allows queries or searches of content of email and phone conversations based on any subject matter put into the search field.

The NSA compliance officer identified several strange 702 “About Queries” that were being conducted. These were violations of the fourth amendment (search and seizure), ie. unlawful surveillance and gathering. Admiral Rogers was briefed by the compliance officer on October 20th, 2016.

Admiral Mike Rogers ordered the “About Query” activity to stop, reported the activity to the DOJ, and then went to the FISA court.

On October 26th, 2016, full FISC assembly, NSA Director Rogers personally informed the court of the 702(17) violations. Additionally, Rogers also stopped “About Query” permanently.

[Things to note: ♦Note the sequencing; ♦note that Rogers a career military person, followed the chain of command; ♦note the dates as they align with the Trump FISA application from the FBI and DOJ-NSD, (ie. early October 2016); ♦and note amid this sequence/time-line the head of DOJ-National Security Divsion, John P Carlin resigns.]

IMPORTANT – WATCH The first two and a half minutes of this video:


The DOJ National Security Division set Admiral Mike Rogers up to take the fall for their unlawful conduct. They preempted Rogers by filing a notification with the FISA Court on 26th September 2016 (look at the pdf). DOJ-NSD head John P Carlin was setting up Rogers as the scapegoat while knowing the NSA FISA compliance officer was still reviewing their conduct. Carlin wouldn’t notify the court unless he was trying to cover something. Carlin then announced his resignation. The NSA compliance officer did not brief Admiral Rogers until 20th Oct 2016. Admiral Rogers notified the FISC on 26th Oct 2016.

October 2016 is a very important month:

♦DOJ Deputy Attorney Bruce Ohr was “demoted” in the summer of 2017 after the Inspector General discovered unreported 2016 contacts between Ohr and Russian Dossier author Christopher Steele, as well as contact with Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson, in October 2016.

♦Also in October 2016 the DOJ lawyers formatted the FBI information (Steele Dossier etc.) for the Trump FISA application; the head of the NSD, Asst. Attorney General John P Carlin, left his job. It would have specifically been John Carlin’s responsibility to ensure a valid legal basis for the FISA application submitted to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC).

In October 2016 the NSA compliance officer completes a review and briefs Rogers of FISA(17) violations, email collection and phone surveillance. Rogers informs FISC – [FISA Court Ruling Link]

Now Look At ThisOctober 2016: On Friday November 18th, 2016, The Washington Post reported on a recommendation in “October” that Mike Rogers be removed from his NSA position:

The heads of the Pentagon and the nation’s intelligence community have recommended to President Obama that the director of the National Security Agency, Adm. Michael S. Rogers, be removed.

The recommendation, delivered to the White House last month, was made by Defense Secretary Ashton B. Carter and Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper Jr., according to several U.S. officials familiar with the matter.

[…] In a move apparently unprecedented for a military officer, Rogers, without notifying superiors, traveled to New York to meet with Trump on Thursday at Trump Tower. That caused consternation at senior levels of the administration, according to the officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal personnel matters. (link)


Important reminder. Remember, in 2015 Sally Yates blocked any inspector general oversight of the DOJ National Security Division (SEE Pdf HERE). The OIG, Michael Horowitz, requested oversight and it was Sally Yates who responded with a lengthy 58-page legal explanation saying, essentially, ‘nope – not allowed.’ (PDF HERE) All of the DOJ is subject to oversight, except the NSD.

There’s a pretty clear picture here.

Obama’s political operatives within the DOJ-NSD were using FISA 702(17) surveillance “about inquiries” that would deliver email and phone communication for U.S. people (Trump campaign). The NSD unit was working in coordination with the FBI Counterintelligence Unit (Peter Strzok etc.).  In an effort to stop the activity NSA Director Mike Rogers initiated a full 702 compliance review.  However, before the review was complete the DOJ-NSD had enough information for their unlawful FISA warrant which worked retroactively to make the prior FBI surveillance (began in July ’16 per James Comey) lawful. Rogers stopped the process on October 26th 2016. As a result of his not going along, Rogers became a risk; Clapper demanded he be fired.

Ten days after the election, November 17th 2016, Admiral Rogers travels to Trump Tower without telling ODNI James Clapper. Rogers likely informs President-elect Trump of the prior activity by the FBI and DOJ, including the probability that all of Trump Tower’s email and phone communication was being collected.

On November 17th, 2016, NSA Director Admiral Mike Rogers went to see President-Elect Donald Trump in Trump Tower, New York.  –SEE HERE–  Director Rogers never told his boss DNI, James Clapper.

On November 18th, 2016, the Trump Transition Team announced they were moving all transition activity to Trump National Golf Club in Bedminster, New Jersey. –SEE HERE– Where they interviewed and discussed the most sensitive positions to fill.  Defense, State, CIA, ODNI.

The transition team was set up in Trump Tower. The very next day, November 18th 2016, Trump moves the entire transition team to Bedminister New Jersey?

Does this make more sense now?

It would appear Obama’s Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, is up to his eyeballs in this; though he denies participating. The FBI counterintelligence unit was monitoring Trump through FISA 702(17) upstream surveillance collected by a DOJ National Security Division that had no oversight.

The information the FBI collected, and the stuff Fusion GPS was creating via Christopher Steele, was used to create the Russian Narrative and also to manipulate the FISC into giving them a FISA warrant. ie. “The Insurance Policy”.

Ultimately, the people within all of these intercepts is what Devin Nunes discovered when he looked at the “unmasking requests” which were a result of those FISA 702(17) collections on Team Trump. That’s why Devin Nunes was so stunned at what he saw in February and March 2017.

This is why Chairman Devin Nunes is currently gathering evidence.


This entry was posted in 1st Amendment, 4th Amendment, Abusive Cops, AG Jeff Sessions, Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Clinton(s), Conspiracy ?, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Desperately Seeking Hillary, DHS, Donald Trump, Donald Trump Transition, Election 2018, FBI, media bias, Military, Notorious Liars, NSA, President Trump, Russia, Secretary of State, Spying, Susan Rice, THE BIG UGLY, Uncategorized, USA, White House Coverup. Bookmark the permalink.

1,066 Responses to Operation Condor – How NSA Director Mike Rogers Saved The U.S. From a Massive Constitutional Crisis…

  1. Obama’s administration politicised IRS, so why not DOJ and the intelligence operations to use as a weapon to assure his agenda to “fundamentally change America” was permanent. Meanwhile they also sought regime change throughout the middle east including Israel. Almost at the same time Obama was asserting that Russia was attempting to influence our election he had operatives in Israel attempting to undermine their election The swamp and the deep state have always been there buried in the State Dept, DOJ and Treasury. Now the scary thing is that Obama also got rid of over 100 of our top military officers and cleaned out the second tier officers below them. We veterans worry that what he often referred to as the Boy Scouts has also been converted to part of the deep state.

    Liked by 4 people

    • clairebee says:

      I forget the name of the individual that gave this information to Nunes about the surveilling of Trump and his team. He was, however, a very trusted attorney and was fired shortly after this (annoying) press conference. Nunes himself was trounced for this and put on suspension from head of this committee for a period of time so that an investigation into his (patriotic) actions could take place. Adam (the Snake) Schiff was the loudest outraged voice. Glad he is back to work on this.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Brian harris says:

        Dennis Montgomery , the. Obama fbi and nsa had him spying on everyone judges, senators, congressmen and women. Chief justice Roberts. Roberts computer was hacked. Also the judge that issued the FISA WARRANT was also hacked. Its believed they black mailed Chief justice Roberts to get him to flip his verdict on Obama care and he did. And same goes for the judge who issued the FISA WARRANT. First denied after computer was hacked warrant was granted. Montgomery went with nunes to DOJ to hand o v er 46 hard drives and 12 note books on everyone he was told to hack and collect dirt on for blackmailing purposes. Alot of ppl are going to be tried in military tribunals let them all hang. And this was all at the request of POTUS # 44


        • jeff montanye says:

          why military tribunals? why not regular courts with full constitutional protections? these convictions, if convictions they be, must be as convincing as possible to generate maximum public support.


  2. Harley says:

    Sad: The first black president in US history, soon to go down in history as the most treasonist traitor of all times.

    Liked by 6 people

    • spartacus says:

      sad , he should be hung from a tree in front of the white house while all the other players to be shot at dawn for crimes against the people …….

      Liked by 4 people

    • Rock Stone says:

      He was Allowed to have Ultimate Power because he was half black.
      It’s true what is said about power Corrupting.
      Besides, he learned from the Master criminals themselves.
      The Clintons..

      Liked by 1 person

      • jello333 says:

        We could have had the first black AND the first woman president rolled into one, and she would have been a million times better than Obama. (Barbara Jordan, of course.)

        Liked by 1 person

        • I’d have suggested Condoleezza Rice myself, but the sentiment is the same. Condi is class, poise and intelligence personified. She would have stood head and shoulders above Obama and HRC, and absolutely would have acquitted herself well as president.

          Liked by 1 person

          • jello333 says:

            I agree that Condi has the talents and qualifications, but I’d want to know more about her involvement with Iraq. There’s a debate about just how important she was in starting that war, and that would pretty much decide it for me. If she WAS part of the warmongering, then I wouldn’t want her as president… but otherwise, yeah, I’d give her a chance.

            Liked by 1 person

            • Diogenese Prime says:

              The decision to go into Iraq was made based on information provided by Intelligence organizations of the United States and other nations, all of whom were in agreement that Saddam had WMDs, which includes biological and chemical weapons. The media that we all know enough not to trust these days are the ones that make our involvement in Iraq seem inappropriate.


              • jello333 says:

                You might wanna check out Trump’s opinion on that… oh and keep in mind that his opposition to the fraudulent, unnecessary, VERY harmful Iraq war was one of the big reasons he won the election.

                Liked by 1 person

        • BTW, didn’t know who Barbara Jordan was until I googled her based on your post; I 100% agree. She seems like a remarkable woman, and would be a genuinely excellent first female president.

          Liked by 1 person

  3. Tony LaScola says:

    Outstanding reporting! Made a complex web of deceptive operations crystal clear that it was corruption.

    Liked by 5 people

  4. Mark Webb says:

    Will anyone go to prison?


    • Diogenese Prime says:

      If someone committed a crime that would send you to prison, then THEY should go to prison, no matter how high up the chain they are; even if they are the top link Barry.


  5. Kathleen Shipley says:

    Quite shocking really. I knew most of this but never put it all together. I thought I would never hear old Evelyn Farkus mentioned again after her first gaffe. She was the Obama dummy that actually believed he was omnipotent. I hope they drag her in for some serious questioning. Honestly, i thought she would turn up dead somewhere after coming out with the unmasking story. Somehow she can still look Americans in the face right along with Susan Rice who also believes Obama is the second coming. Thank you so much Dan for this information. I am now a solid follower of your podcast.

    Liked by 2 people

  6. shazam85 says:

    Compelling that the evidence is forming a consistent timeline with documentation and events lining up. Conversely the ‘Russia’ narrative is ever changing and collapsing. Said narrative nearly always reliant upon hearsay and innuendo often coming from convoluted extraneous sources outside the US.


  7. Janet Taylor says:

    So President Trump was right. How shocking.

    Liked by 3 people

  8. morrisonpcm says:

    The level of intellect,patriotism,selfless heroism leaves one speechless;One falls to knees and Thanks God in Heaven for such people, for such person as AdmiralRogers…with awe&deference…similar to that I felt at a “special closed StPaul’sCathefral monthly service”..deep gravity of the self-sacrifice of Life for Femicracy&sanctity of Individual life”…

    Liked by 1 person

    • morrisonpcm says:

      For “Democracy” …not Femicracy…spell correct algorithm very far off base…


    • Heidi Brown says:

      Amazing patriotism and courage! Media would have us believe it has died! So glad i have prayed for those who are still willing to take a stand, at their own peril. Thanking God every day for men and women who are still Serving this ountry. Not serving themselves.
      A book should be written on this. These were the most perilous times for the republic to survive. Our young need to see some true heroes. So a movie shoul also come out of this.

      Liked by 2 people

      • No movie. The Damn thing would have Obama as the hero.


        • Diogenese Prime says:

          This would make an excellent MAXI series, far bigger than Roots, Centennial, etc. FOX is the only network that could do it justice. Dan Bongino, the former CIA agent, could end each night’s viewing with a summary analyzing that night’s episode that would lead to the next episode. It could start out with all the things HRC did and the things Adm. Rogers discovered. What happened to George Papadopolis alone would be interesting, like a Bond movie, then there’s General Flynn’s story, Manifort, Roger Stone being arrested in his t-shirt saying he’s innocent, by 19 LLEA and FBI agents, frogmen and helicopters. So much mystery and intrigue. The audience would expand exponentially every night.


  9. Buddy says:



  10. Earl J Catagnus says:

    I am wondering when all this comes out in a simple format for Republican PR to show the depth of deceit Democrats use to stay in power. We must purge this treasonous behavior from the highest office to the lowest form of our government. Many patriotic Americans will fight to protect our constitution to prevent our country from being fundamentally changed. We must protect our history, values and the unknowing public from those who want to destroy us from within our government.This blog is enlightening for all who care about the GREAT USA.

    Liked by 4 people

  11. Monica L Caplan says:

    Superb reporting!!

    Liked by 1 person

  12. Patricia Dolan says:

    I am most grateful to you for write this superb piece of history. Excellent work!


  13. Paul donnelly says:

    How did things get to this point? Smh.


    • Perotin says:

      Euphoria over The First Black President, abetted by an incurious public, a young and uncritical if not obsequious and adoring press, in service to a Soros-sponsored, malicious, destructive group of political geniuses the like of which we have probably never seen in America before (but now that are here).


  14. Perotin says:



  15. Ralph Mansfield says:

    I appreciate this tweet. Helps to see the details. Got to get to the bottom of this. #Release the Memo


  16. Phyllis Chase says:

    I cant tell CTH ENOUGH HOW well informed I am since I started reading your analysis of what you call “The Big Ugly” I refer to it and read it over to keep up with this reality we are all facing. Thank You for your work on this.


  17. Maxine Smith says:


    Liked by 1 person

  18. Alma Vazquez says:



  19. ERV says:

    Hey Folks,

    remember to keep your eye on the BIG picture, this is only a part of the International Effort that requires the removal of the United States to succeed. These sellouts are probably too stupid to realize they are being used to destroy the last vestige of hope against a One World Government, but then, maybe they do know. At any rate, we must be prepared to stand against the Tyranny.
    Our Constitution is the only protection we have and it must be defended against all enemies, foreign and DOMESTIC!! GOD SPEED!!


  20. Grace Reeves says:

    Complex. It reads like an espionage novel, particularly when this illegal activity occurred not only to President Trump, his family and campaign, but includes World Leaders, conservative party Congressmen, honest journalist and film-makers who opposed Obama’s administrative wrong doings, SCOTUS’, and average citizens, too.


  21. fiveaces01 says:

    Such an amazing article I had to reread. Thank you.


  22. Sheila Bronczek says:

    In the press briefing, I believe Nunes is referring to the 650 million documents contained on 47 hard drives that ex-CIA contractor, Dennis Montgomery gave to Nunes, this EXACT same evidence of mass surveillance that was given to ex-FBI Director James Comey in 2015, in which Comey just SAT on.


  23. Helen Hall says:

    This took my breath away! I am a huge PATRIOT!!!! Admiral Rogers really is a National Hero along with Senator Nunes. Please make this viral!!!

    Liked by 2 people

  24. Pingback: Connecting the Dots on a timeline… – 'Nox & Friends

  25. Auset Patriot says:

    As a former television anchorperson, I dare share this my White House colleagues…wish I could.


    • Barry Cole says:

      Why can’t you? Why don’t the real reporters with a true reporters’ lust for truth and fairness even exist any more. How many are CIA plants? Where is deep throat, and Woodward and Bernstein, when you need them?

      Who’s got the big hand squeezing all the balls of all the networks?.

      You, sir/madam owe us, and yourself, the effort and the service to help protect us from all enemies foriegn AND Domestic!

      Liked by 1 person

  26. Jeffv96818 says:

    Incredible article. Really puts all the pieces together. This should be looping on every mainstream media channel.


  27. rolfusaugustusadolphus says:

    If anyone is still reading this thread, I made a discovery: The first national poll showing a big lead for Trump in the GOP primaries came out on July 20, 2015, the EXACT SAME DAY that Sally Yates blocked the IG from investigating the NSD.

    June 15, 2015 >>> Jeb Bush enters race
    June 16, 2015 >>> Trump enters race
    July 13, 2015 >>> first poll showing Trump national lead, by 3%
    July 16, 2015 >>> 2nd poll shows Trump 3% lead
    July 20, 2015 >>> ABC/WaPo poll shows Trump with 11% lead
    July 20, 2015 >>> Yates blocks IG from NSD.

    Someone please tell sundance about this.

    Polling archive:



  28. Bill Carson says:

    I’m reading this late, but it’s still relevant and awesome! Has anyone integrated the disclosure of spies into the Trump Campaign with it?


  29. Barry Cole says:

    This stinking rathole infestation is so obvious, already. And Rosenstein is still in office? With what you have here, why are indictments, and trials being opened and conducted. Through court subpoenas the material can be gathered faster? Just so agonizingly slow going this way,.And, this underhanded corrupt invasion and violation of Trump and our nation’s most highly valued principles is nauseating.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s