Most people are unaware that in this senate election cycle New York Senator and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer is up for reelection. National media have ignored mentioning the Schumer -vs- Pinion race. Few people, even those in New York, realize that Chuck Schumer is on the ballot next week.
Republican candidates in New York are surging and there is a potential, slight though it might be, for Schumer to be defeated in his race. If every New York state voter that supports Republican gubernatorial candidate Lee Zeldin also votes for New York Senate Republican candidate Joe Pinion, there is a path for Schumer to be removed from office. A removal of Chuck Schumer would be akin in scale to the Scott Brown victory for the “Kennedy seat” in Massachusetts in 2010.
Any chance of victory first starts with people realizing Chuck Schumer is on the ballot for defeat next week. Few people are even aware of it, and the RNC along with the UniParty in Washington DC have made no mention of it. Steve Bannon interviewed Joe Pinion {Direct Rumble Link} to discuss: WATCH:
https://rumble.com/embed/v1ohi6e/?pub=4
[Joe Pinion Website Here]
What Joseph Pinion needs most right now is recognition by people in New York that this race actually exists. There’s a reason why no one has discussed the fact that Chuck Schumer is on the ballot. There’s a reason why media has not previously outlined this race. The outcome is entirely dependent on the people of New York realizing the opportunity that is in front of them.
New Yorkers need to vote for Lee Zeldin for governor and Joe Pinion in the senate race.


Iranian leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini issued a fatwa calling for Rushdie’s death over what he claimed were blasphemous references to Islam. A $3 million bounty was placed on his head for anyone who kills him. The fatwa was never rescinded, and Rushdie spent well over a decade hiding under protective custody.
The entire episode, including the ridiculous charges against Jose Alba, was fraught with racist undertones from the district attorney’s office.
Keep in mind, when writing the majority decision Justice Clarence Thomas concluded there was no historical requirement that law-abiding citizens show the kind of special need for self-defense required by the New York law to carry a gun in public. Indeed, as Thomas wrote, there is “no other constitutional right that an individual may exercise only after demonstrating to government officers some special need.”
The 78-page 