For a brief moment I will allow myself to imagine that Tucker Carlson’s research team is aware of the information we have previously provided. If so, an interview with Julian Assange could be exceptionally interesting.
Tucker posts on Twitter that he was visiting with Julian Assange today:
A WALK IN THE VERY DEEP WEEDS….
The Weissmann/Mueller report contains claims that Russia hacked the DNC servers as the central element to the Russia interference narrative in the U.S. election. This DNC hack claim is the fulcrum issue structurally underpinning the Russian election interference narrative pushed by the Weissmann and Muller Special Counsel. However, this essential claim is directly disputed by WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, as outlined during a Dana Rohrabacher interview and by Julian Assange’s own on-the-record statements.
Assange was arrested at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London immediately after the Weissmann/Muller report was released to Bill Barr. Despite investigating the background of the Trump-Russia nonsense, John Durham never touched the DNC hacking claim – the core of the Mueller report. Why? Because Durham knew the U.S. Government threw a bag over Assange to protect the fraudulent Trump-Russia and Russian interference claims.
Again, this reality speaks to the corruption within the John Durham investigation. Durham was protecting Weissmann, Mueller and the core of their justification for a 2-year investigation. Durham knows why Assange was arrested. Durham stayed away from it, intentionally.
The Russians HAD TO have made efforts to interfere in the election, or else the factual basis for the surveillance operation against candidate Donald Trump is naked to the world.
That’s why so much DOJ, FBI and Mueller special counsel energy was exhausted framing the predicate.
“Seventeen intelligence agencies,” the December 29th Joint Analysis Report, the expulsion of the Russian diplomats which was an outcropping of the JAR, the rushed January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment, shoving microphones in everyone’s faces and demanding they answer if they believed Russia interfered – all of it, and I do mean every bit of it, is predicated on an absolute DC need to establish that Russia Attempted to Interfere in the 2016 election.
The “Russian Malicious Cyber Activity – Joint Analysis Report” (full pdf) is pure nonsense. It outlines nothing more than vague and disingenuous typical hacking activity that is no more substantive than any other hacking report on any other foreign actor. However, it was needed to help frame the Russian interference narrative.
There were no Russian diplomats involved; there was no Russian election interference; there was no Russian hacking of the DNC; it was all a fraud created by the intelligence community (IC), FBI and Main Justice to support Hillary Clinton’s lies and then cover their own targeting tracks.
On September 26, 2021, Yahoo News published an extensive article about the CIA targeting WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange in 2017 and the extreme conversations that were taking place at the highest levels of the U.S. government about how to control him.
There is a much bigger story transparently obvious when overlapped with CTH research files on the Mueller investigation and the U.S. intelligence community. Specifically, the motive intentionally not outlined by Yahoo News.
What I am going to share is a deep dive using the resources and timeline from within that Yahoo article and the specific details we have assembled that paints a clear picture about what interests existed for the Deep State, the Intelligence apparatus and the Mueller-Weissmann special counsel.
This fully cited review is not for the faint of heart. This is a journey that could shock many; it could alarm more and will likely force more than a few to reevaluate just what the purpose was for Mike Pompeo within the Donald Trump administration.
As the Yahoo News article begins, they outline how those within the Trump administration viewed Assange as a risk in 2017.
Here it is critical to accept that many people inside the Trump administration were there to control events, not to facilitate a policy agenda from a political outsider. In the example of Assange, the information he carried was a risk to those who attempted and failed to stop Trump from winning the 2016 election.
Julian Assange was not a threat to Donald Trump, but he was a threat to those who attempted to stop Donald Trump. In 2017, the DC system was reacting to a presidency they did not control. As an outcome, the Office of the President was being managed and influenced by some with ulterior motives.
Yahoo, via Michael Isikoff, puts it this way: “Some senior officials inside the CIA and the Trump administration even discussed killing Assange, going so far as to request “sketches” or “options” for how to assassinate him. Discussions over kidnapping or killing Assange occurred “at the highest levels” of the Trump administration, said a former senior counterintelligence official. “There seemed to be no boundaries.”
As we overlay the timeline, it is prudent to pause and remember some hindsight details. According to reports in November of 2019, U.S. Attorney John Durham and U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr were spending time looking carefully at CIA activity in the 2016 presidential election. One quote from a media-voice increasingly sympathetic to a political deep-state noted:
“One British official with knowledge of Barr’s wish list presented to London commented that, “It is like nothing we have come across before, they are basically asking, in quite robust terms, for help in doing a hatchet job on their own intelligence services”“. (Link)
It is interesting that quote came from a British intelligence official, as there was extensive pre-2016 election evidence of an FBI/CIA counterintelligence operation that also involved U.K. intelligence services. There was an aspect to the FBI/CIA operation that overlaps with both a U.S. and U.K. need to keep Wikileaks founder Julian Assange under tight control.
To understand the risk that Julian Assange represented to FBI/CIA interests, and effectively the Mueller special counsel, it is important to understand just how extensive the operations of the FBI/CIA were in 2016. It is within this network of foreign and domestic operations where FBI Agent Peter Strzok was clearly working as a bridge between the CIA and FBI operations.
By now, people are familiar with the construct of CIA operations involving Joseph Mifsud, a Maltese professor generally identified as a western intelligence operative who was tasked by the FBI/CIA to run an operation against Trump campaign official George Papadopoulos in both Italy (Rome) and London. {Go Deep} John Durham ignored him.
In a similar fashion, the FBI tasked U.S. intelligence asset Stefan Halper to target another Trump campaign official, Carter Page. Under the auspices of being a Cambridge Professor, Stefan Halper also targeted General Michael Flynn. Additionally, using assistance from a female FBI agent, under the false name Azra Turk, Halper also targeted Papadopoulos. Again, John Durham ignored it.
The initial operations to target Flynn, Papadopoulos and Page were all based overseas. This seemingly makes the CIA exploitation of the assets and the targets legal and much easier. If Durham went into this intelligence rabbit hole, there would be a paper trail that leads back to Robert Mueller. Durham didn’t go there.
John Durham and IG Michael Horowitz both outlined how very specific exculpatory evidence was known to the FBI and Main Justice, yet that evidence was withheld from the FISA application used against Carter Page and/or it was ignored. The FBI fabricated information in the FISA and removed evidence that Carter Page was previously working for the CIA. This is what FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith was indicted and convicted for doing.
One week after the FBI and DOJ filed the second renewal for the Carter Page FISA [April 7, 2017], Yahoo News notes how Mike Pompeo delivered his first remarks as CIA Director:
[…] On April 13, 2017, wearing a U.S. flag pin on the left lapel of his dark gray suit, Pompeo strode to the podium at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), a Washington think tank, to deliver to a standing-room-only crowd his first public remarks as Trump’s CIA director.
Rather than use the platform to give an overview of global challenges or to lay out any bureaucratic changes he was planning to make at the agency, Pompeo devoted much of his speech to the threat posed by WikiLeaks. (link)
Why would CIA Director Mike Pompeo be so concerned about Julian Assange and Wikileaks in April 2017?
In April of 2017 Pompeo’s boss, President Donald Trump, was under assault from the intelligence community writ large, and every deep state actor was leaking to the media in a frenzied effort to continue the Trump-Russia collusion conspiracy.
The Trump-Russia effort was so all consuming that FBI Director James Comey was even keeping a diary of engagement with President Trump in order to support an ongoing investigation built on fraud – yet, Mike Pompeo is worried about Julian Assange.
Again, here it is important to put yourself back into the time of reference. Remember, it’s clear in the text messages between FBI Agent Strzok and Lisa Page that Peter Strzok had a working relationship with what he called their “sister agency”, the CIA.
♦ Former CIA Director John Brennan admitted Peter Strzok helped write the January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) which outlines the Russia narrative; and it was also Peter Strzok who authored the July 31st, 2016, “Electronic Communication” from the CIA to the FBI that originated FBI operation “Crossfire Hurricane.” Strzok immediately used that EC to travel to London to debrief intelligence officials around Australian Ambassador to the U.K. Alexander Downer.
In short, Peter Strzok was a profoundly overzealous James Bond wannabe who acted as a bridge between the CIA and the FBI. The perfect type of FBI career agent for 2016’s CIA Director John Brennan to utilize.
Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson hired CIA Open-Source analyst Nellie Ohr toward the end of 2015, at appropriately the same time as “FBI Contractors” were identified exploiting the NSA database and extracting information on a specific set of U.S. persons. One, if not the primary extractors, has now been identified as Rodney Joffe at Neustar. “The campaign plot was outlined by Durham in a 27-page indictment charging former Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann with making a false report to the FBI. The plot was also outlined in the finished Durham report. Eight individuals who allegedly conspired with Sussmann but does not identify them by name. The sources familiar with the probe confirmed that the leader of the team of contractors was Rodney L. Joffe.” {Go Deep}
It was also Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson who was domestically tasked with a Russian lobbyist named Natalia Veselnitskaya. A little reported Russian Deputy Attorney General named Saak Albertovich Karapetyan was working as a double agent for the CIA and Kremlin. Karapetyan was directing the foreign operations of Natalia Veselnitskaya, and Glenn Simpson was organizing her inside the U.S as part of his Trump-Russia creation.
Glenn Simpson managed Veselnitskaya through the 2016 Trump Tower meeting with Donald Trump Jr. However, once the CIA/Fusion GPS operation using Veselnitskaya started to unravel with public reporting, back in Russia Deputy AG Karapetyan died in a helicopter crash.
Simultaneously timed in late 2015 through mid 2016, there was a domestic FBI operation using a young Russian named Maria Butina tasked to run up against Republican presidential candidates. According to Patrick Byrne, Butina’s handler, was FBI agent Peter Strzok who was giving Byrne the instructions on where to send her. {Go Deep}
All of this context outlines the extent to which the FBI/CIA was openly involved in constructing a political operation that settled upon anyone in candidate Donald Trump’s orbit. A large international operation directed by the FBI/CIA and domestic operations seemingly directed by Peter Strzok operating with a foot in both agencies. [Strzok gets CIA service coin] Durham eviscerated the predicate for all of this in his report, yet stayed away from the part that leads to Robert Mueller in 2017.
Recap: ♦Mifsud tasked against Papadopoulos (CIA). ♦Halper tasked against Flynn (CIA), Page (CIA) and Papadopoulos (CIA). ♦Azra Turk, pretending to be Halper asst, tasked against Papadopoulos (FBI). ♦Veselnitskaya tasked against Donald Trump Jr. (CIA, Fusion GPS). ♦Butina tasked against Trump and Donald Trump Jr (FBI).
Additionally, Christopher Steele was a British intelligence officer hired by Fusion GPS to assemble and launder fraudulent intelligence information within his dossier. And we cannot forget Oleg Deripaska, a Russian oligarch, who was recruited by Asst. FBI Director Andrew McCabe to participate in running an operation against the Trump campaign and create the impression of Russian involvement. Deripaska refused to participate.
All of this engagement directly controlled by U.S. intelligence, and all of this intended to give a specific Russia impression. This predicate was what John Durham was reviewing in November of 2019, and then released in his final report – while whitewashing the parts that led to the Mueller silo.
The key point of all that contextual background is to see how committed the CIA and FBI were to the constructed narrative of Russia interfering with the 2016 election. The CIA, FBI, and by extension the DOJ and a multitude of political operatives, put a hell of a lot of work into it.
We know John Durham looked at the construct of the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA); and talking to CIA analysts who participated in the construct of the January 2017 report that bolstered the false appearance of Russian interference in the 2016 election. This context is important, because it ties in to the next part that involves Julian Assange and Wikileaks. This is where the motives of Mike Pompeo in mid/late 2017 come into play.
[…] By the summer of 2017, the CIA’s proposals were setting off alarm bells at the National Security Council. “WikiLeaks was a complete obsession of Pompeo’s,” said a former Trump administration national security official. (link)
On April 11th, 2019, the Julian Assange indictment was unsealed in the Eastern District of Virginia (EDVA). From the indictment we discover it was under seal since March 6th, 2018:
On Tuesday April 15, 2019, more investigative material was released. Again, note the dates: Grand Jury, *December of 2017* This means FBI investigation prior to….
The FBI investigation took place prior to December 2017, it was coordinated through the Eastern District of Virginia (EDVA) where Dana Boente was U.S. Attorney at the time. The grand jury indictment was sealed from March of 2018 until after Mueller completed his investigation, April 2019.
Why the delay?
What exactly was the DOJ waiting for from March 2018 to April 2019?
This timeframe is the peak of the Robert Mueller/Andrew Weissmann special counsel investigation.
Here’s where it gets interesting….
The Yahoo article outlines, “There was an inappropriate level of attention to Assange“, by the CIA according to a national security council official. However, if you consider the larger ramifications of what Julian Assange represented to all of those people inside and outside government interests who created the Trump-Russia collusion/conspiracy, well, there was actually a serious risk.
Remember, in May 2017 Robert Mueller and Andrew Weissmann effectively took over the DOJ. The purpose of the Mueller investigation was to cover up the illegal operation that took place in the preceding year. The people exposed in the Trump-Russia targeting operation included all of those intelligence operatives previously outlined in the CIA, FBI and DOJ operations. These are the people John Durham did not indict.
The FBI submission to the Eastern District of Virginia Grand Jury in December of 2017 was four months after congressman Dana Rohrabacher talked to Julian Assange in August of 2017: “Assange told a U.S. congressman … he can prove the leaked Democratic Party documents … did not come from Russia.”
(August 2017, The Hill Via John Solomon) Julian Assange told a U.S. congressman on Tuesday he can prove the leaked Democratic Party documents he published during last year’s election did not come from Russia and promised additional helpful information about the leaks in the near future.
Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, a California Republican who is friendly to Russia and chairs an important House subcommittee on Eurasia policy, became the first American congressman to meet with Assange during a three-hour private gathering at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, where the WikiLeaks founder has been holed up for years.
Rohrabacher recounted his conversation with Assange to The Hill.
“Our three-hour meeting covered a wide array of issues, including the WikiLeaks exposure of the DNC [Democratic National Committee] emails during last year’s presidential election,” Rohrabacher said, “Julian emphatically stated that the Russians were not involved in the hacking or disclosure of those emails.”
Pressed for more detail on the source of the documents, Rohrabacher said he had information to share privately with President Trump. (read more)
Dana Rohrabacher later published this account of the events:
Knowing how much effort the CIA and FBI put into the Russia collusion-conspiracy narrative; and knowing that Assange could essentially destroy the baseline predicate for the entire Trump-Russia investigation – which included the use of Robert Mueller; it would make sense for corrupt government officials to take keen interest after this August 2017 meeting between Rohrabacher and Assange.
That contact between Rohrabacher and Assange explains why those same government officials would quickly gather specific evidence (related to Wikileaks and Bradley Manning) for a grand jury by December 2017.
Within three months of the grand jury seating (Nov/Dec 2017), the DOJ generated an indictment and sealed it in March 2018.
The EDVA then sat on the Julian Assange indictment while the Mueller/Weissman probe was ongoing.
As soon as the Mueller probe ended, on April 11th, 2019, a planned and coordinated effort between the U.K. and U.S. was executed; Julian Assange was forcibly arrested and removed from the Ecuadorian embassy in London, and the EDVA indictment was unsealed (link).
As a person who researched this fiasco, including the ridiculously false 2016 Russian hacking/interference narrative: “17 intelligence agencies”, Joint Analysis Report (JAR) needed for Obama’s anti-Russia narrative in December ’16, and then a month later the ridiculously political Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) in January ’17, this timing against Assange is not coincidental.
It doesn’t take a deep researcher to see the aligned Deep State motive to control Julian Assange, because the Mueller report was dependent on Russia cybercrimes, and that narrative is contingent on the Russia DNC hack story which Julian Assange disputes. Again, John Durham stayed away from it!
♦ This is critical. The Weissmann/Mueller report contains claims that Russia hacked the DNC servers as the central element to the Russia interference narrative in the U.S. election.
This claim is the fulcrum underpinning the Russia election interference narrative. However, this core and essential claim is directly disputed by Julian Assange, as outlined during the Dana Rohrabacher interview, and by Julian Assange’s on-the-record statements.
The predicate for Robert Mueller’s investigation was specifically due to Russian interference in the 2016 election.
The fulcrum for this Russia interference claim is the intelligence community assessment (Peter Strzok); and the only factual evidence claimed within the ICA is that Russia hacked the DNC servers; a claim only made possible by relying on forensic computer analysis from another Michael Sussmann partner, Shawn Henry at Crowdstrike, yes another DNC contractor and collaborator with the Clinton campaign.
The CIA held a massive conflict of self-interest problem surrounding the Russian hacking claim as it pertained to their own activity in 2016. The FBI and DOJ always held a massive interest in maintaining the Russian hacking claim. Robert Mueller and Andrew Weismann did everything they could to support that predicate; and all of those foreign countries whose intelligence apparatus participated with Brennan and Strzok also carried a self-interest in maintaining that Russia hacking and interference narrative.
Julian Assange was/is the only person with direct knowledge of how Wikileaks gained custody of the DNC emails; and Assange claimed he has evidence it was from an inside DNC leak, not from a DNC hack.
The Russian “hacking” claim was ultimately so important to the CIA, FBI, DOJ, ODNI and U.K Intelligence apparatus. Well, right there is the obvious motive to shut Assange down as soon as intelligence officials knew the Mueller report was going to be public. And that is exactly what Main Justice and the U.S. intelligence community did.
This is why John Durham never touched it.
All of them know what happened.
All of them know why Julian Assange was taken from the Embassy in London. A bag had to be thrown over Assange in order to retain the justification for the Weissmann/Mueller special counsel and the larger Russian election interference claims. None of them do not know this. They all know.
Start asking the right questions about the timeline of Assange being arrested. Ask about the DNC hack and Russian provenance according to Crowdstrike. Ask key and specific questions about the FBI working with Crowdstrike and about the DOJ and EDVA case against Assange.
The people around the Deep State all know what happened. SO DO WE!
Ok so how on earth did PDJT survive against all this? How did they all fail? And if you say because they are really dumb then you better for sure collar up and buy as much brass as you can cause the real threats are all over the land now
Because he is anointed and therefore divinely protected, so far.
EXACTLY.
HOW did he manage to win in 2016, with all of the forces aligned to prevent it?
HOW did he avoid being driven from office like Nixon was, in a “soft-coup” being orchestrated by people IN his administration?
HOW could he have lived his life, being successful in some of the most corrupt of businesses ( NYC real estate development, Casino resort operations, and show business) and yet withstand the most intense anal probing searches for ANYTHING scandalous in his background, and have his enemies come up empty?
A miracle of God is something that can not possibly happen, but DOES.
To those who have eyes to see, it is obvious. To those who’s eyes and hearts are closed, even seeing the red sea parted will not convince them.
Correct, Dutchman.
Amen. The unnatural anger and hatred towards Trump is demonic in nature, as is the desire to destroy this country, and some of our leaders, I my opinion, are demon possessed…i.e. Biden, Pelosi, Schiff. One would not be able to have withstood all Trump has endured with the protection of the hand of the Lord.
I paced back and forth and prayed so damn hard the night of the 2016 election. I literally paced back and forth nonstop– did not sit down.
For hours as I paced I prayed over and over–“Please, God. Please, God Please, God.”
When they called it I laughed, cried, and prayed over and over — “Thank you, God! Thank you, God Thank you. ..”
It was Divine Intervention. 🙏🇺🇲💕🦁👑🇺🇲💕🇺🇲
Let’s do it again!!!
I knew he had 2020 in the bag, too. I just didn’t factor in the Big Steal. 👹👹👹
I did, too.
Trump won because he built his empire while dealing with NY, the mob, unions, entertainment, and other aggressive developers. Real world experience Trumps a bunch of corrupt bureaucrats that only know the internal government machinations, as opposed to the real world.
Government workers are generally but not always lazy. Easier to catch them glossing over important details than the corporate thieves.
I would agree with that.
Without divine protection… no one could survive the torture PDJT has been put through, 24/7 for many years. It’s unrelenting… and cruel and evil.
Read though the books of Kings. There are many, many corrupt kings and many Godly kings. God let them be evil because the people looked away from God.
This morning’s reading was from Daniel 6. The clever “Government” people made up laws and got Daniel thrown into the lion’s den. Most know the rest of the story. If you don’t know the story. Daniel is the 27th book in the Old Testament ~ Jewish Torah. The story is how Daniel deals with living in a strange land, a corrupt and evil land, where laws are ignored and people do evil things… Does this story sound familiar? Does it sound like some of the stuff that is going on now. Not sure the anointed evil one will do any bowing to God, but some minds are changing.
God is in control. We still need to bow to his wisdom and authority.
Our Father, which art in heaven,
Hallowed be thy Name. Thy Kingdom come.
Thy will be done in earth, As it is in heaven.
Give us this day our daily bread.
And forgive us our trespasses,
As we forgive them that trespass against us.
And lead us not into temptation,
But deliver us from the evil one.
For thine is the kingdom,
The power, and the glory,
For ever and ever.
Amen.
Don’t forget Samson…
God’s hand is on PDJT, and God is not finished with President Trump and He isn’t finished with the United States of America.
It’s such a MASSIVE amount of CORRUPTION and COVERUP still going on today. Amazing to read, but nothing we didn’t already know. The pieces are lying there in plain sight.
Don’t forget the massive money laundering and robbing our treasury blind with no oversight. The foxes are guarding the henhouse.
Hence the gov’t anguish over no more money to Ukraine. Joe needs to support those expensive homes he has, w/huge property taxes, staff, etc. Not to mention the cost of diapers!
Shawn Henry, Pres. of Crowdstrike, sworn testimony to House Intelligence Committee, Dec. 2017:
“Henry reiterated his claim on multiple occasions:
https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2020/05/13/hidden_over_2_years_dem_cyber-firms_sworn_testimony_it_had_no_proof_of_russian_hack_of_dnc_123596.html
plus the app on the system under crowdstrike that notifies when a usb drive has been inserted
Point # 4 circular reasoning, which sounds stupid. “That we didn’t see the data leave,” “based on what we saw.” they don’t want to believe their lying eyes in other words.
isn’t it interesting that every conspiracy you read about has Hillary Clinton’s’ finger prints on it- what I don’t understand is why she is STILL making ridiculous statements and putting herself out there, as if she believes there’s an interest in what she has to say…I guess the believes that she is bullet proof…though she might be wiser to recognize that most of the country Hates her, realizes that that she lied abut EVERYTHING (Anyone with half a brain knew the Dossier was phony but Hillary pushed it to impeachment- and just like with Benghzi , and her bleach bit server, she scoots away scott free). No one wants to hear from her- NOT EVEN BILL.
Bill Binney, former NSA analyst, proved the Dem emails were not hacked. It was impossible to send that amount over a network at that time when Internet speeds were lower.
It was in all likelihood, Seth Rich. And of course that is why he was murdered.
Yet Hillarious still says it, as does MSM and even RINO politicians who never bothered to study the issue.
Once a lie is told so many times, it’s believed to be truth.
Along with Binney’s basic analysis of file transfer data rates, there was the insanely preposterous Crowdstrike report which fabricated a massive Russian hack attack out of a sophomoric phishing attempt.
It is bad enough the American citizens bought into all that, but what’s even worse is that the entire IT and software community went silent.
Crowdstrike, Awans, Seth (parents, siblings, friends, gf, co-workers)
All of these above should be collected and interrogated in the interest of national security for this country. A Coup has occured – and answers must be found.
Why not just go inform a few Hamas cells here that various parties were Zionist collaborators with Israel, etc, get them all upset, and give them addresses and a reminder about 72 virgins?
And Debbie Wasserman Schultz and the Awan affair is still unresolved, as is the Donna Braziel and Bill Clinton tarmarc meeting.
It wasn’t Donna Brazille. It was Loretta Lynch.
And Debbie Blabbermouthschultz as head of DNC sent the Awans to “take care of” Seth Rich they but killed him instead of just a roughing up. The Awans did it because they were caught in the congressional password account hacking scandal that went away after they did that one last job on SR.
I think they threatened Seth’s parents, etc. Let’s not make their lives more difficult.
One of my favorite stories coming out of this, was when they indicted a Russian company, assuming the company would not respond.
Caught them totally flat-footed, when lawyers showed up and said “Ready for Trial”!
I remember that, it was too cute.
I think Binney was part of the software community and he was not silent. I think it is like covid, the doctors telling the truth were subjected to loss of job, license, etc. Still a few spoke out and paid the price. Also, many doctors were silenced by not being published in journals, losing youtube, losing other avenues of publication. The same would be true for the software community. At any rate, the Pizzagate community was sleuthing and digging up even more information and putting it out there.
I remember reading the full Forensic Investigation Report by NSA/Intel Agency (retired) and IT pros analysis that was provided to President Trump.
The claimed DNC “Hack” could not occur to an overseas location with available internet service speeds based on the metadata packet times stamps for total transfer time based on 1st & Last packet time stamps in the “hacked” data. However it could be transferred that fast by a direct copy from a DNC computer to a portable hard drive / thumb drive by someone with access to a DNC computer / server! The metadata packets also included time and location data indicating the time of transfer as EST somewhere on the East Coast USA. Therefore, most likely Seth Rich and his murder!
In addition, some of the files had been altered by a CIA SW tool via copy and paste of file content into a template that enabled the country of origin of the content to be any desired, i.e. Russia. Executive Summary of the Forensic Analysis Report can be found here:
Executive Summary of the Forensic Analysis Report by Intel Vets can be found here explains in more detail:
https://consortiumnews.com/2017/07/24/intel-vets-challenge-russia-hack-evidence/
The Top 100 Wikileaks emails as well as the Top 20 Most Damaging Wikileaks prior to the 2016 election.
The Intel Vets also sent letters to:
Sundance has done an outstanding job of explaining why the Forensic evidence and science have been totally ignored since 2016!
Yes, I remember that.
No, not “the Dem emails”. The transfer-speed argument applies “Guccifer 2.0″‘s claimed hack of July 5, 2016 and to nothing else. Specifically, it has nothing whatever to do with the DNC emails that were released by Wikileaks later that month. But the argument does support the notion that “Guccifer 2.0”, who was trying to insinuate responsibility for the earlier DNC leak, was not in fact a Russian hacker. In all likelihood “Guccifer 2.0” was a US intelligence spawned disinformation operation.
isn’t it interesting that every conspiracy you read about has Hillary Clinton’s’
fingerclaw prints on it-everything is a conspiracy, when you have a Coup or Color Revolution that owns the Media (it will just say the opposite everytime)
HRC is “out there” because they reinstated the Clinton Global Initiative
https://www.clintonfoundation.org/clinton-global-initiative-september-2023-meeting/
The grift must go on, don’t you know…!
Because if she fades away she knows she will become irrelevant, and she knows if she becomes irrelevant she becomes expendable, and once she becomes expendable somebody will toss her under the bus. She must maintain a profile to keep up the tenor of fear. It is her only protection. EVERYBODY hates her. (and I mean everybody, including, especially her husband)
Thank you, Sundance!
Unfortunately, most of the tv zombies still trust what the mockingbird media says as gospel. I do think those people think something isn’t right with this regime’s criminality in our face everyday. Our alleged gov enabling massive illegal invasion, drugs, ignoring the rule of law. Hopefully more wake up before it’s too late.
A.R. Roberts,…
You are repeating a common lament that HAS BEEN true for many years, but that I would argue no longer is; the “oh, WHEN will the American sheeple ‘wake up’?
If you quit lamenting and actually look at revenue, where MSM and Big Tech each lost $1Billion, in 2022 and once the final figires are in are bound to show similar losses for 2023 and if you look at “ratings” or viewership, for example the viewership for any Republicon first loser debate, vs. WHATEVER PDJT was doing, or “views” of CTH, TGP and Bannons War Room vs. viewership of CNN, MSNBC and Fox,..there are clear, convincing and consistent signs that the SHEEPLE HAVE AWOKEN,looked up and are no longer being blithely herded as they were for many years.
And the confirming proof is in the polls (remembering MAGA do NOT do polls!).
IF people were still buying the propoganda THEY were shoveling, the Indictments would have caused PDJT’s poll #’s to plummet, and WE would all now be talking about how Ron can beat Joe.
So, quit singing a lament, and recognise WE have achieved an important victory; our Rebel alliance of “alt-right, MAGA Media” are totally DOMINATING the MSM/Big Tech platforms, and any false narrative they promulgate, is destroyed within hours/days/weeks instead of bouncing around for years.
While following the links I came across an article that shows how quickly the charges against all the 2021 Trump Inauguration violent rioters were dropped because the rioters were all dressed alike in black and wearing masks at the same time Mueller began control of DOJ in May 2017.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna889531
The rioters claim they succeeded in beating their charges due to solidarity and all refusing to accept plea deals which prevented any testimony that could expose the deep state coordination.
the reason is the Coup created, guided, and protected them…
the excuse of them not taking a plea being why they got off is FAKENEWS LIE Media coverup BS.
Just like J6 they could have charged them with 100 years and said dont take a plea deal if you dont want to.
Yes … and Mueller is all over the DOJ dropping the charges after they attempted to prevent the inauguration.
Getting the impression Tucker is tracking a different beast. Assange is part of the trail, Russiagate is part of the trail, but they are not THE trail.
if its that easy – PDJT could just send someone to talk to Assange and get the info.
it isnt. its shocking Tucker gets access.
I am going to assume Assange is DEAD
Premature, his wife saw him during the transition from UK to US control.
So what happened to Mifsud ? Last I heard Durham had a phone that belonged to him and was allegedly going to expose what was on it but it never happened. Knew it was too good to be true. Durham just turned out to be another clean up guy and all we got was a guilty plea from Clinesmith who received no prison time. We were ROBBED !!!
Ph, he got the PHONES, alright.
And put them on the shelf, right next to awan, weiner, hunter laptops, etc.
The irony is, all of this electronic evidence of their crimes, that the FEEBIES run around vacuuming up, …and a whole lot MORE, is right there in the NSA database.
Its NOT “gone” and THEY have no problem with manipulating the FISA system and using 702 searches to target their enemies.
Just imagine the evidence, IN THEIR OWN WORDS, of the “Insurance policy” soft coup and coverup, the Ukraine impeachment coup attempt, the Covid vax plot, the 2020 election steal, etc.
Its all RIGHT THERE, just awaiting investigators to punch in the appropriate “702 about” searches, and use “3 hop” to follow the trails…
“Why they can NOT allow PDJT back in the Oval office, for $500, Alex.”
WOW! That’s correct. NSA has all their data and Trump as POTUS can order it all be used at their trials.
The only place to prove where the leaks came from..
.. was framed as Russia…
.. to box it off from investigation by anyone else other than…
.. Weismann the Snake.
Weismann who was brought into the 7th floor of FBI, along with Comey, by Mueller during the “W” administration.
“W” intentionally paved the way for Obammy, and Bush v Gore was all a set up, to introduce the voting machines.
Uniparty in action,…
Next up- Tucker needs to somehow interview Edward Snowden.
I think he’s after Assange because both were reporters. His interview may or may not expose anyone or any organization. Tucker has been pretty forthcoming in his views on J6 and others falsely/incorrectly handled by FBI, etc. Tucker may not touch the specifics of why Assange was jailed other than that it is partisan.
Here’s a March 2019 technical article by Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS) that directly derails the entire “hacking” narrative with technical detail (https://consortiumnews.com/2019/03/13/vips-muellers-forensics-free-findings/). Couple this information with everything known about Seth Rich, and things get even more disturbing. The entire first impeachment was so stupid with the “quid pro quo” horseshit. I have always contended that the REAL issue with the phone call Trump made to Zelinski was the passage where he mentioned Crowdstrike. I believe that was what triggered the claxon and red lights with the Democrat party. They couldn’t possibly allow that to develop any further.
Crowdstrike located in UKRAINE!
Best of luck, Tucker!
What if Assange is a schmuck who broke a story about a war crime that was ignored and had no impact, then decided his “thing” in life was being a political prisoner (more impact)?
Mutter cryptic statements but then get too choked up to continue, as the world beats a path to his door for more gruel.
Pamela Anderson has been a frequent visitor. Politcal leaders. Journalists. Now Tucker Carlson is climbing the mountain to consult the guru perpetually on the edge of death who holds all the keys.
He’s a living version of Q-anon, stringing along those who want to be strung along, confident of the countless books and stories that will immortalize him as he makes an occassional trip to the balcony to get photos of himself pumping his fist in the air … but never never – EVER – delivering the goods he is thought to have.
Wonder when Pamela Andeson will schedule her next visit.
All he has to do is make sure he dies under ambiguous circumstances and he will be the focus of a publishing cult for the next couple centuries, as countless people find new ways to interpret tea leaves. “What did he know? When did he know it? What 35-layer deep plot did he have the answers to? Who REALLY killed Julian Assange” Lot of people would envy that kind of immortality if they could get it.
What if the first three letters of his last name set the framework for his life?
https://www.insider.com/pamela-anderson-julian-assange-joked-about-marrying-after-frisky-night-2023-1
“Pamela Anderson and Julian Assange joked about getting married on the steps of the Ecuadorian embassy in London after a ‘frisky, fun, alcohol-induced night'”
“The Baywatch actress detailed in her newly released book, out Tuesday (coinciding with the release of her Netflix doc Pamela, a love story), how she would regularly visit Assange in the Ecuadorian embassy in London. She added that their friendship didn’t stop when he was sent to the supermax prison, Belmarsh, saying he requested that she be the first to visit him. ”
I bet he did….
For those unfamiliar with the VIPS group, Bill Binney, or the original article published in “The Nation”, KVH’s liberal rag, here ya go! Just for snickers, do a little time-surfing of the subsequent Leftoid dissembling that occurred afterwards, it’s hilarious😹
http://patricklawrence.us/new-report-raises-big-questions-last-years-dnc-hack/
Great catch of an article here, TY.
A commenter on Patrick Lawrence’s fine article you link to ends with: “Thank you for your courage in writing this piece. No doubt this has not helped in your effort to be famous or even just conventionally wealthy or successful, but your integrity and pursuit of the truth has made you a very important person and journalist which history and time will prove out your efforts have not fallen on deaf ears and dull minds. I see you and it is good. You are good. Thank you.”
The same can be said of our illuminating and determined host, Sundance!
Seth Rich.
Those mentioning Binney… There are two things you need to know…
Forensicator was the original source for the research. His output is more reliable than most of the statements people here are attributing to Binney. see: https://theforensicator.wordpress.com/guccifer-2-ngp-van-metadata-analysis/
Forensicator also found that the DOJ had missed out the start of the DNC email exfiltration (missing 25% or more of the initial take by at least 48 hours), so, may have stumbled on a cover-up. see: https://theforensicator.wordpress.com/sorting-the-wikileaks-dnc-emails/
Forensicator also found various pieces of evidence linking Guccifer 2.0 to US time zones and found evidence that suggested Guccifer 2.0 was planting it’s Russian breadcrumbs.
(Note: This isn’t meant as a slur against Binney, just a statement about the accuracy of some of the arguments being attributed to him.)
A “Bill Binney says” argument is a very weak substitute for factual and accurate arguments based on the evidence.
The data rates were still unlikely to be achieved via internet access.
“d” not D
This will never end without the leadership of the Deepstate/UniParty/K-Street/Wall Street dropping through the trap door of a hangman’s scaffold. Right now we have a mentally feeble, financially corrupt, and controlled President who is weakening the country’s borders, defenses, and economy, while a corrupt senate, and an out-of-control deep state look the other way.
Assuage should be rewarded with a ticker tape parade instead of being in jail . If it weren’t for him Hillary would have been elected president. He is a true hero.
This is also why – as long as President Trump is a serious chance of becoming President again in 2025 – Assange must stay behind bars.
Assange will not be freed as long as Trump is a serious political figure.
Unless Trump as POTUS pardons him, which Trump should do.
Julian Assange – The US Has Interfered with 81 Elections Since 1950
“The United States government, since 1950, has intervened in 81 elections, interfered, to use Schiff’s language,
in 81 elections.
That is not including coups, which have overthrown the government.
So there’s a long history of the United States doing this to places around the world in infamous ways and most recently, alleged interference in the election of Israel.
So I think we should understand that the United States is in a glass house when it comes to allegations of attempting to interfere with or influence election results.”
Great overview and analysis Sundance. It is so easy to fake “Russian” origins in code, just make sure the comments use non-English word order, Russian idioms, etc. Ditto for the variable names. Also, the timestamps on the files were proof that it had to be a direct download to a flash drive not a download over the internet. No Russian had access to the DNC server.
Pizzagate is based on the content of some of the emails that Assange published. Quite damning without any of the research provided by the many who provided corroborating proof. Just as real as Epstein’s Island and Ghislaine’s black book and pictures of Prince Andrew with an underage girl.
How is Pompeo involved. Sorry if this is a stupid question.