Occam’s Razor: When faced with competing explanations for the same phenomenon, the simplest is likely the correct one.
(1) An investigative silo within the federal apparatus falsely identified me as “1% Watchdog.” (2) When confronted with the truth of the matter, and after their own independent investigation, federal investigators acknowledged that some other entity fabricated their bona fides using my identity. (3) Admitted (by them) the most likely motive was to influence trust amid the communication group of “1% Watchdog.”
In my humble opinion, and applying Occam’s Razor, “1% Watchdog” was/is a federal agent.
What other motive would a person carry to fabricate their identity, create false bona fides, if not to influence a sense of trust in their target audience?
NOTICE the wording: […] “your administration of the “Stop the Steal J6” channel.”
This appears to outline “1% Watchdog” as the owner/administrator/controller of the communication platform.
These are not unfounded suppositions. Simply reverse engineer the process, apply the scientific method to your review, then apply Occam’s razor.
Counselors – On behalf of your client(s) file a motion with the judge requesting a court order compelling Zello to give up the registration records of the ‘Stop the Steal J6’ channel. This will identify the person behind “1% Watchdog”. If federal prosecutors fight the request for the court order, well: (a) there’s your answer; and (b) take the next step of using the preexisting congressional subpoena as evidence to support your compulsion.






