Tripwire – Of Course Wall Street Wants/Needs Marco Rubio…

The currently considered TPP (Trans-Pacific Partnership) trade deal has the potential to be the fulcrum under every plank in the 2016 presidential election. Many people view immigration as the #1 concern underlying further economic issues – however, few people recognize that immigration is actually part of the TPP construct.

You can learn more about TPP in summary form HERE and HERE

So lets take this conversation back to where it belongs, at the point where massive money intersects with consequential presidential politics.

TPP trade 2

Globalists, via Wall Street international financiers, are determined to get TPP passed into law.  Only a few of the GOP candidates stand in the way; and off those few only one serious candidate is a risk to their objectives.   Candidate Donald Trump is the primary roadblock to the current globalist goals…. And as such, they support Marco Rubio.

However, the power-brokers who hold the keys to the White House do not support Marco Rubio as a stand-alone candidate; rather they view Rubio as a tool to deliver their original goal as designed in 2013/2014 and carried out in 2015:

Remove candidate Donald Trump and Ben Carson becomes Herman Cain, Ted Cruz replaces Newt Gingrich and Jeb Bush plays the 2012 role of Mitt Romney.

All intended to deliver this outcome:

clinton bush

The Clinton/Bush contest represents the “Win/Win race” ultimately favorable to the globalists.  There is not a substantive difference in up-stream policy; the distracting ‘shiny things’ are social issues.  Both Hillary Clinton and Jeb Bush are open border globalists.

Jeb Bush will never drop out of the race.  Regardless of how poorly he polls, the GOPe road map is contingent upon Jeb winning the primary race sets up the Republican side of the uniparty coin.  The general election becomes inconsequential as both sides of the coin no longer represent risk.

Jeb Bush has major financial deposits already in place for use in February, March, April of 2016.  The RNC/GOPe rule changes, primary date changes, and structural enhancements are all in place to assist this three month objective.  Jeb Bush will never drop out of the race.  Jeb Bush can be defeated, but he will never drop out.

If Jeb Bush fails to win the nomination all resources will be deployed to insure Hillary wins.  It is important to understand that regardless of the GOPe getting Jeb into place, if he fails their best play then becomes getting Hillary elected.  This achieves the goal of the TPP crowd, and also retains the power of the GOPe leadership in Washington DC.

house senate leadership boehner pelosi reid mcconnell

The GOPe does not lose if they lose an election to a Democrat.  If Hillary wins they are still in place, still employed, still at the trough and still in power.  The GOPe only loses if a conservative, or a person they do not control, takes the White House and begins setting an alternative legislative agenda.

The enemy of the RNC/GOPe are not Democrats, the enemy of the GOPe are conservatives or those who they do not control.  This is evident in how the GOPe and DEMs work together to insure legislative priorities of the Wall Street financiers are maintained.  ie. Obamacare, TPA/TPP, Immigration, Common Core, Amnesty, et al.

Social issues are bones to keep the left and right wings in line, distracted, and showing up to the polls.  Financial legislation issues are the real issues both sides of the UniParty view as paramount.

All of that accepted, candidate Marco Rubio remains the best tool to remove the pesky vulgarian that could possibly upset the globalist goals.  This has been in the works for almost two months now originating in ‘Operation Hummingbird‘.

IF the GOPe machine can grind Rubio to the top of the field, and they will do everything possible within their power to achieve that goal, the plan appears to be attacking Trump with a death by thousand paper cuts approach.

As soon as Trump is in a controlled space the hounds from hell will be unleashed by Team Jeb.  Remember:

Remove Donald Trump” (that’s Rubio’s Job)… “Ben Carson becomes Herman Cain (easy to remove as we have recently watched)… Ted Cruz becomes Newt Gingrich (Cruz the polarizing antagonist without friends in the Senate and with sketchy relations)… “And Jeb Bush becomes Mitt Romney” (strolling through Feb/March/April by design)

Now you might ask: what about Rubio?

That’s where all of this comes into play and will be seeded into the MSM by Karl Rove.

Karl Rovemarco rubio and wife

Think about it, with the information already ‘out there’ about Jeanette Rubio working/not working for donor Norman Braman for $1,000/wk – ask yourself why the MSM didn’t follow that story during the credit card fiasco?….

And that’s not the half of it.  What about:

Marco Rubio …[…] But the credit card mess will seem like a walk in the park after your opponents—whether on the GOP side or Mrs. Clinton’s scorched-earth operatives—get to the case of your cocaine trafficking brother-in-law, Orlando Cicilia.

Cicilia did his time and has stayed out of trouble, remaining a treasured member of your family, but that doesn’t matter. Life is unfair. Somebody will drag it up and hang it around your neck.

For the media, it’s an irresistible story: Cicilia’s close association with cocaine kingpin Mario Tabraue—supposedly the model for Al Pacino’s Tony Montana in “Scarface”—and the disappearance of courthouse records when a Florida investigative reporter started looking into your connection to Cicilia.  (link)

And What About:

[…]  Senator Marco Rubio has given us quite a bit of information about his family over these last three years. During the 2009 U.S. Senate campaign he showed the world that he was proud of the way that his parents raised him and his siblings.

However, Univision Investiga found out that Rubio’s older sister, Barbara, was part of one of the largest anti-narcotics operations in South Florida for that year.

According to Florida’s public records, federal prosecutors in Miami took the home where Barbara Rubio lived with her husband Orlando Cicilia. Prosecutors suspected that the house was violating state drug laws. Another building that the couple had owned, which is now an office building, was taken by the prosecutors for the same reason.  (link w/more)

Again, that’s not even the half of it.

Oh yes, if Rubio completes his necessary assignment, Karl Rove will drop these into the MSM shark cage and the frenzy will begin.  What will be the outcome?  Jeb Bush

All by design.

Now does this “tweet” make a little more sense:

grubering us 2

Candidate Jeb Bush attends Chamber of Commerce dinner with Fox's Rupert Murdoch and Valerie Jarrett (December 2014)

Candidate Jeb Bush attends Chamber of Commerce dinner with Fox’s Rupert Murdoch and Valerie Jarrett (December 2014)

Just a Reminder, this is an insurgency. – The modern enemy of Wall Street is Main Street vulgarians. The enemy of the RNC/GOPe is not Democrats, it’s Grassroots Conservatives, more vulgarians.

The Republican Party, and the Republican media apparatus, view us as their enemy. We are the enemy they need to protect themselves from:

In 2014, the RNC approved selection rules that govern how each state’s delegates are portioned out from the primaries. Under one of the changes, states holding their primaries between March 1 and March 14 will have their delegates doled out proportionately with election results, a change that will likely stymie a movement candidate.

States that have primaries on or after March 15 will be winner-take-all states.

That’s important because another RNC rule change requires that a candidate must win a majority of delegates in eight or more states before his or her name may be presented for nomination at the 2016 Republican National Convention.

With 18 GOP presidential candidates, for now, it will be that much harder for any candidate to win a majority in any state, let alone eight. (Article July 2015)

GOP-versus-Tea-PartyNow, ask yourself, why would the RNC want to “stymie a movement candidate“? Who exactly does that benefit? Obviously, the “non-movement” candidate, ie “the turtle“.

Isn’t the entire reason for campaigning in Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina etc. to make a movement/momentum?

In addition Rule #40 changed in 2014 from previously five needed state wins, to a newer threshold of eight (8):

Officially, it’s Rule 40 in the RNC handbook and it states that any candidate for president “shall demonstrate the support of a majority of the delegates from each of eight (8) or more states” before their name is presented for nomination at the national convention. (article March 2014)

Again, ask yourself who does this benefit? A candidate can win seven states outright, and still not have their name presented for nomination?

These rules were made/affirmed in 2014 – Who or what exactly was the GOP concerned about blocking in 2016 that would necessitate such rules? When combined with other rule changes you can clearly identify a consolidation of power within the RNC apparatus intentionally constructed to stop the candidate of the GRASSROOTS from achieving victory.

It’s all part of their GOPe Roadmap.

♦ Reference and Resources – (links to internal MSM references are contained within prior outlines): RNC Rule Changes RNC Rule Battles

  1. Following The Money
  2. The GOPe Roadmap
  3. ♦ The Roles of The Players – “The Splitters
  4. ♦ How each candidate is aligned in the Roadmap
  5. ♦ Arrow #1 Trump Hits The Super-PACs – The GOPe Achilles Heel
  6. ♦ Arrow #2 Trump Hits Bush – Inside The Wall Street Fortress
  7. ♦ Arrow #3 Trump Cuts Off Rubio/Bush switch – The GOPe Switch
  8. ♦ The Rick Perry Tripwire Exposed – DC Super-Pac
  9. ♦ Jeb Bush Super-Pac Will immediately spend $10 Million
  10. ♦ Proving there is only one political party in Washington DC
  11. ♦ Why Support Trump – Part One (The GOPe Ruse)
  12. ♦ Why Support Trump – Part Two (Stop being played)
  13. ♦ Why Support Trump – Part Three (Intellectual Details)
  14. ♦ How To Defeat the GOPe Road Map
  15. ♦ Current Polling Exposes – the Ohio, Florida, Texas, Virginia, New York Splitters
  16. ♦ Florida Polling Exposes – Donald Trump defeating Jeb’s Florida Strategy
  17. ♦ Rush Limbaugh Discusses/AffirmsThe “splitter strategy”
  18. ♦ The Biden Paradox – Trump Winning Means Clinton Must Be Removed
  19. ♦ Salem Media Communications (GOPe Media Arm) Launches Attack
  20. ♦ Open Letter To GOPe – The Conservative Frustration
  21. ♦ Why The GOPe Will Never Stop Attacking Donald Trump
Advertisements
This entry was posted in Big Stupid Government, Clinton(s), Decepticons, Dem Hypocrisy, Desperately Seeking Hillary, Donald Trump, Election 2016, Marco Rubio, media bias, Trade Deal, Tripwires, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

95 Responses to Tripwire – Of Course Wall Street Wants/Needs Marco Rubio…

  1. feralcatsblog says:

    Trump is not just the best choice, he is the only choice.

    Liked by 14 people

  2. BigMamaTEA says:

    Tools. So many are just useful tools. They get wined and dined and think they are hot shi’te. Think anybody but Trump has figured it out yet?!!!

    Liked by 6 people

  3. feralcatsblog says:

    Have truth will travel reads the card of the man
    An American Moses in a PC enslaved land
    His fast draw on the Establishment heeds the calling wind
    A Soldier for America is the man called Trumpadin

    He skewers the establishment wherever he must
    His own checkbook of silver is his badge of trust
    There will be legends that American freemen will sing
    Of the man who crushes the establishment, of the man called Trumpadin

    Liked by 4 people

  4. Khoi Vo says:

    Donald Trump in 2016. If he does not win the GOP nomination, we all stay home and watch our country burn for years to come.

    Liked by 1 person

    • justfactsplz says:

      If he doesn’t win the nomination we still show up in massive numbers and write his name in.

      Liked by 9 people

      • Trumpster2016 says:

        And also vote D down the line to dog catcher. You will have to burn the Village first to rebuild the new Village

        Liked by 2 people

        • justfactsplz says:

          That’s a great idea. Snuff them out.

          Like

          • Trumpster2016 says:

            Next summer if the GOP starts playing games with Trumps delegates and tries to screw him, I will let every R running know what I will do, protest vote against them, maybe they then will send their panic upstairs!

            Liked by 1 person

        • amjean says:

          That will accomplish little because the issue is that
          there is a Uniparty of both democrats and republicans,
          not two separate parties.

          Liked by 3 people

        • stringy theory says:

          As I have stated here before, your approach is mine–vote D down the line except for Trump and unless you have a real, proven conservative rep. in Congress (not many of them). The billionaires who run the uni-party may not care whether it’s yebbie or hitlelry, but I can guarantee those down ticket GOPe hacks sure value their jobs. I think this is the threat they need to feel. And why not wipe out the GOPe since they’re just the other side of the same dumbocrap party.

          Liked by 2 people

      • Col.(R) Ken says:

        Vote early and often………pre printed stickers……no chads, no mis spellings,……..a 100,000,000 Million write in campaign……

        Liked by 4 people

        • justfactsplz says:

          Good thinking, Col. With preprinted stickers they can’t kick votes out for misspellings.

          Liked by 2 people

          • wanthetruth says:

            Can we write Trump in for all votes straight down the ballot? Or would that disqualify the ballot? Just think how many offices he could win all across the land! I suppose they have jurisdictional /state living requirements. Too bad.

            Like

            • wanthetruth says:

              Nah, on second thought, they’d choose which office they want to accept your Trump vote for and nullify the president vote – not good.

              Like

            • justfactsplz says:

              Wouldn’t that be something. Unfortunately we can only write him under the president column. Hopefully it won’t come to that.

              Like

  5. NHVoter says:

    What a mess.

    What the GOPe fails to realize is that Trump will tear Rubio apart when the time is right. His rehearsed canned speeches won’t save him. I think there will be a revolt if Jeb is the nominee – many people will realize the fix has been in from the start. We need Trump now more than ever.

    Liked by 3 people

  6. wyntre says:

    Hate to be a killjoy but it’s almost like there’s no chance of changing the inevitable.

    What’s the roadmap for a DT win other than a grass roots insurgency? And even if that succeeds voter fraud is going to be off the charts.

    What’s the path to a DT victory?

    Liked by 1 person

    • jackphatz says:

      An enormous amount of things will have to go wrong from now until Spring. What will it take?

      Liked by 1 person

    • getfitnow says:

      What’s the path to a DT victory?

      As in any war, OVERWHELMING FORCE.

      Liked by 12 people

    • Jett Black says:

      The grass roots insurgency is pretty much it, I think. My inner pessimist expects a “brokered” GOPe convention, ending with an acclamation vote between Trump and Twig as the selected candidate. Regardless of what really happens, those at the podium will declare Twig the candidate. They’ve done it before and will at least try to do it again. The importance of the 2nd Amendment is coming clearer. My optimist hopes that GOPe will have a “come to Jesus” moment where they realize that attempting to rule in Hell really isn’t nearly as good as serving in Heaven. They acknowledge the will of the people and the benefits to everyone–themselves included–of the USA as a sovereign nation, the basis for making America great again.

      Liked by 3 people

      • justfactsplz says:

        The GOPe are so entrenched in their money and power they don’t want to do good. It would take a miracle act of God for them to have a “come to Jesus” moment but that would be great and God is able. God doesn’t force his will on anyone. People have to want to change first.

        Liked by 1 person

      • truthandjustice says:

        Sadly, I think your “pessimistic” side might win out about a brokered convention but…..I can be optimistic that Trump knows all this and is/will prepare – and with God’s help, he will win.

        Liked by 2 people

      • Trust No One says:

        Either last week or week before, I heard on John Batchelor show (lady professor can’t think of her name) discussing the GOPe. She predicted a path to a brokered convention and the GOPe putting Ryan in as candidate. Possible – probable???

        Liked by 1 person

        • flyanddive says:

          That’s the reason Carson is in the race, he was an insurance policy just in case a grassroots candidate started to gain momentum. Right now Carson is the biggest threat to us because of his fake religious stories.

          Liked by 1 person

      • wyntre says:

        i tried to like your comment but WP is acting prissy again.

        Actually, I tried liking all replies to my comment but no can do.

        Like

    • truthandjustice says:

      Yes – voter fraud & other efforts will be “off the charts”. But I saw this by Wayne Allyn Root – note what he says about voter fraud:

      Why only Trump Can Beat Hillary – excerpts

      “Trump is our last best chance to save America. . only one man vicious and courageous enough to fight back and win against the Clinton war machine.
      * ..understands how to fight to win…has experience in the trenches of New York real estate- the only business close to the dirty game of politics. Trump has the killer instincts to win in a war against vicious people devoid of morals like the Clintons. This is no game for nice, well-mannered people. This is no time to bring knives to a gun fight. Trump will bring a laser guided nuclear missile.

      only candidate with the chutzpah to point out to America in the strongest terms possible that Hillary is a criminal whose actions make her more deserving of the Big House than the White House. .. No other Republican has the skills to pull this off.
      only Trump has the audacity and willingness to investigate and prosecute Democrats who have run roughshod over the US Constitution. I’m not as worried about Trump’s conservative principles, as I am excited by the prospect of making Obama, Hillary, Eric Holder, Valerie Jarrett, Jonathan Gruber .., and top IRS officials pay for their crimes against the American people and violations of the Constitution. ..
      .. (will) spend tens of millions.. on armies of vicious lawyers who will STOP VOTER FRAUD. ..Only Trump has an army of (best) lawyers so vicious, ruthless and brilliant that no one in New York wants to do battle with him. Trump doesn’t lose. .. Every smart businessman knows, “Never go to battle with Trump.”

      It’s time to stop being nice guys. Stop being stupid. Stop being naïve. Politics isn’t for nice guys. .. It’s time to bring out the nuclear weapon. Stop worrying about his “conservative credentials.” Start worrying about President Hillary Clinton. Only one person can play by the Clinton’s rules and beat them at their own game.

      It’s time for Trump.”

      http://rootforamerica.com/nice-guys-finish-last-why-only-trump-can-beat-hillary/

      Liked by 7 people

      • Marie Rogers says:

        all the rubio fans (idiots who gave him big round of applause) better think about who they send to wash dc.. do they really believe that he will go there and things will change? will he repeal obamacare, get rid of IRS open canadian pipeline, battle and win isis..no it will be the same old.
        .only one man can go to washington and make deals with the republican idiots we elected..DONALD J TRUMP!

        Like

    • cardinalmike says:

      This doesn’t answer your question specifically but I found this article enlightening and some of the comments even more so in trying to construct winning the grass roots insurgency.

      Liked by 1 person

    • amjean says:

      The only thing I can think of is to try and educate
      the voters as to what is really going on.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Venus says:

      Brute force and awkwardness — like the man himself.

      Otherwise, the country’s toast.

      Pay attention.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Doodahdaze says:

      Nobody is going to vote for a waiter wearing a wig.

      Liked by 1 person

  7. One card in Trump’s hand is Hillary’s inauthentic and painfully recent opposition to TPP. She can distance herself from her “Clinton Global Initiative” past, but nobody should believe it. She will flip back on TPP as soon as she’s in office and China gives her the necessary cover.

    Kerry gave opponents a real gift with his invitations to Russia and China. The true dangers cannot now be denied.

    Yes. Cankles are best served after slow-roasting over TPP.

    Liked by 3 people

  8. Juan says:

    Seems as though Rubio’s misuse of party charge cards has gained no traction. It figures his family ties with a convicted drug dealer will have the same fate. Maybe there is more to come out about his association with David Rivera that will paint him in a different light. Marco is a sleazy politician in the truest sense. He was relentless in acquiring campaign contributions in his Florida races. That hasn’t changed in his presidential campaign. He will say & do anything to build his campaign chest all the while denying the many strings attached for the cash.

    This article is a few years old, but details some of his dubious dealings with Rivera. If anyone has more information on Rubio’s cozy relation with this guy once on a list of the most corrupt members of Congress, please share.

    http://www.newrepublic.com/article/politics/magazine/103395/marco-rubio-david-rivera-florida?page=0,0

    This is a newer article from the leftist Washington Post. it wouldn’t surprise me if they have more dirt in reserve for when they really start campaigning for Hillary.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/for-sen-marco-rubio-a-question-of-friendship-vs-politics/2015/05/08/7a75ca9c-dd30-11e4-be40-566e2653afe5_story.html

    Liked by 2 people

  9. Nightcrawler says:

    Ah, me.
    I have earned my living working in oil and gas since 1981. I don’t work the production side any more, but I have a good understanding of the policies, practices and procedures therein. Similarly, since 2008, I have made studying “global warming/climate change” something of a personal hobby. I have read much of what has been espoused on both sides of the argument. Shoot, I even paid pocket money to go see Al Gore’s movie!

    So, in reading through the links provided by SD regarding TPP and criticism thereof, I came across the following:

    Locking in Natural Gas Exports and Fracking:

    The TPP’s provisions regarding natural gas would require the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to automatically approve all exports of liquefied natural gas (LNG) to all TPP countries – including Japan, the world’s largest LNG importer. This would:

    Facilitate Increased Fracking: Increased natural gas production would mean more fracking, which causes air and water pollution, health risks, and earthquakes, according to a litany of studies.

    Exacerbate Climate Change: LNG is a carbon-intensive fuel with significantly higher life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions than natural gas. LNG dependency spells more climate disruption.

    Increased Dependence on Fossil Fuel Infrastructure: LNG export requires a large new fossil fuel infrastructure, including a network of natural gas wells, terminals, liquefaction plants, pipelines, and compressors that help lock in climate-disrupting fossil fuel production.

    Now, I have no expertise regarding auto parts from Vietnam and timber harvesting in Peru, but I do know a thing or two about drilling, fracking, disposal wells, pipelines, infrastructure and greenhouse gas.

    I don’t want to go into a long ‘point by point’ refutation (Though I certainly could- it doesn’t belong on this thread.), but I will state, without hesitation, that the above criticism is pure horse s**t.

    The problem, for me, then unavoidably becomes…to what extent are the other criticisms dependent upon dubious assertions? I don’t know. I just don’t know.

    Nevertheless, I don’t accept that my neighbor can tell me how to mow my grass or water my azaleas. I don’t accept that my ‘neighbor country’ can tell me what acceptable food is. I don’t agree that my representatives in Congress and my business decisions are subordinate to ‘global courts’. I am sovereign. We are sovereign. We are a nation. We are not a corporate subsidiary.

    I stand against the TPP.

    Liked by 5 people

    • phil fan says:

      Nice Nightcrawler. Seems like big business (oil, gas) wants mandated sales targets/policies while at the same time using the Green Team talking points about this increased production is ‘bad’ as a sales point to the public. They’re playing a double game and they are good at it. But yep, they are wrong in mandating other countries messing with our sovereign decisions.

      Greed never knows when to quit

      Liked by 3 people

  10. fred says:

    what’s hard to believe is not that the GOPe guys got paid to support amnesty and open borders but the real truth is it is their political suicide. They have committed political and social suicide. Can’t fix stupid so even if we win taking back the party they have already invited the enemy in to overwhelm them with votes and population forever. There is no future with this GOPe. It’s a no win. The illegal voter fraud alone will be resounding. We are in the midst of the biggest losers of all time. Paul Ryan is speaker…????So yeah stay Repub till the primaries but even if we win a few it is certain we can’t win on their team. This GOP is doomed by their own hand. New party is only way and invite the new people in.

    Liked by 2 people

  11. Great Kabuki says:

    Here’s one more thing I’ll throw into the CTH blender for consideration.

    I know a pretty well connected lawyer who used to bundle a lot of GOP money. He had a falling out a couple of cycles ago because of what he describes as “those idiot consultants.” He now believes that the timing of the Boehner-Ryan speaker switch-a-roo is a calculated fall back position if two things happen:

    Brokered convention.
    If Jeb is just too tainted, the knight in shining armor is the reluctant Speaker Ryan.

    This gives Ryan a year to polish his reputation, build his brand, and “reach out” to the folks. He agrees that Hillary would certainly be the preferred choice over Trump but believes the GOPe still wins it all with Ryan.

    Take it for what’s it worth but it makes a lot of sense. These guys aren’t taking any chances.

    Liked by 4 people

    • Trust No One says:

      Interesting. See my post above. Heard same on radio.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Great Kabuki says:

        I missed that but the chatter is happening as they try to misdirect everything, right? Also, your post reminded me that last week Rove wrote about the increasingly difficult roadmap to the nomination. The link won’t work here because it is subscription, but here’s the “money quote” from the piece published 11/4/15:

        “It is unlikely that the GOP will reprise 1880, when it took 36 ballots to nominate James A. Garfield, who wasn’t even a candidate when the convention began. But it is possible that the nomination will still be up for grabs when the GOP convention opens on July 18, and that delegates could need more than one ballot to select the party’s candidate. That’s not necessarily a bad thing. After all, Republicans took three ballots in 1860 to pick a fellow named Lincoln.”

        All part of the plan? Have a back-up to a back-up to back-up!

        Liked by 2 people

      • Great Kabuki says:

        Well, well, well, right on schedule: in tomorrow’s (Thursday 11/12) Wall St Journal Trump gets a double punch.

        First, the Trump obsessed Rove is back with another in a long line of WSJ hit pieces on Trump (remember…Rupert Murdoch owns the Journal, too). Classic, predictable headline:

        A Good Debate, but Not for Trump
        He was the night’s biggest loser: full of contradiction and without depth.

        Second, the always reliably Trump hater Daniel Henninger writes about…wait for it…a possible brokered convention!

        It’s getting predictable is it not?

        Liked by 2 people

  12. Raffaella says:

    Donald Trump is still the leader in a Newsmax poll taken after Tuesday’s Republican presidential debate in Milwaukee, with half of respondents saying he fared bestj

    Here are the results:
    Donald Trump: 51 percent
    Ted Cruz: 19 percent
    Marco Rubio: 13 percent
    Ben Carson: 7 percent
    Carly Fiorina: 3 percent
    Rand Paul: 3 percent
    John Kasich: 1 percent
    Jeb Bush: 0 percent

    Jeb is at 0%. HOW DOES ONE GET 0% IN A VERY LARGE POLL???

    Liked by 3 people

  13. RINOKiller says:

    No one will stay home, there will be revolts all over the country because we the people are sick and tired of this!

    Wonder why the Furher has this military operation going on, and its not because of that Texas invasion rumor

    Liked by 2 people

  14. KBR says:

    There’s a lot of buzz on lib comments about “crazy republicans with guns” and “around here police have to follow cars with redneck state’s license plates to keep us safe.” A lot of buzz about “right wing crazies and govmt plans against them” too. On web in general.
    Also a lot of “You’re not paranoid if they’re really out to get you.”
    We live in interesting times.

    Liked by 4 people

    • phil fan says:

      The fear mongering from the left will only increase. That’s a great shiny object for their base. Ironic since the globalist Dems have more guns and power than We the People. Just rally to our Man, spread word in calm rational terms on the issues which are numerous. Cold anger, calm courage.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Betty says:

      KBR, your comment makes me wonder, if we are willing to burn the GOPe to the ground are they willing to burn us to the ground also?

      Liked by 2 people

      • Coincidentally, Martin Armstrong had an interesting blog entry today with some links: http://www.armstrongeconomics.com/archives/19378. Worth perusing just for the history lesson about how far TPTB will go, and it’s from 1962, just before Kennedy’s assassination.

        Liked by 2 people

        • Betty says:

          Thank you for that link, I have to confess, unless I am mispronouncing his name and there for not recognizing him, I never heard of Charles-Louis de Secondat Montesquieu, baron de La Brede et de, or his contribution to our founding.

          Charles-Louis de Secondat Montesquieu, baron de La Brede et de

          Here is an enlightening excerpt:
          “Montesquieu is the man who inspired the creation of the tripartite branch of government – executive – legislative – judiciary. Allowing the executive to appoint former prosecutors as judges defeats the entire system. To allow the Supreme Court to pick and choose what it wants to hear eliminates your right to an independent judiciary for it is now simply the prerogative of kings and ministers. For the judiciary to say you cannot challenge the government unless it does something to you is absurd for then the constitution has no force of law and they get to do whatever they like and it is your burden to then prove you even have any constitutional rights. Unless you are “rich” no one can afford the legal fees to defend your pretend rights so they really do not exist.

          Everything the Constitution was intended to create has been circumvented and career politicians cannot and do not “represent” the interests of the people – only government. Congress passes taxes and regulations the people would never do and have no clue what they are even doing.”

          http://www.armstrongeconomics.com/archives/19378

          Like

        • Betty says:

          Since I first heard of it the idea of “Standing” baffled me. How could an American court say American citizens did not have “standing” to challenge Obamacare, or Obama’s credentials to be president?

          “Allowing the executive to appoint former prosecutors as judges defeats the entire system.

          To allow the Supreme Court to pick and choose what it wants to hear eliminates your right to an independent judiciary for it is now simply the prerogative of kings and ministers.

          For the judiciary to say you cannot challenge the government unless it does something to you is absurd for then the constitution has no force of law and they get to do whatever they like and it is your burden to then prove you even have any constitutional rights. ”

          Wow – A person almost needs to read that at least three times.

          Like

      • KBR says:

        Did I say we are “willing to burn” anything? No, I did not.
        I simply noted what leftists are saying.

        But the gope “elite intellectuals” (they call themselves that) were, from the start of this campaign, frequently saying “we” Trump supporters are “no info” “uneducated masses” “ignorant”
        “followers of an entertainer clown” and other very low comments every time they spoke of Trump supporters.

        It sounded very much like a feudal courtiers’ call-to-arms against the upstart peasants.

        So it seems they would have no qualms actually setting us ” ignorant masses” ablaze, and would feel justified in doing so. After all our replacement peons are waiting just across that open border they so love.

        Their and their leftist dem friends’ biggest problem in actuality is Trump’s open and loving support of the military, and the police. And in the quiet–(active military not allowed to openly campaign, police discouraged from openly campaigning)–support they sense there for Trump.

        In a “feudalist-mindset” elite-think-tank, of a still-Medieval-mind and value-system:
        in considering any potential overwhelming-warlike-action against the “peasants” the question must arise: would the most-able and best-armed knights fight for or against the peasants? (This is RHETORICAL, no answers needed, nor desired.)

        Elite scribes, even since Medieval times= weaklings and hiders, not warriors.

        Like

  15. jameswlee2014 says:

    All of their idiot plans will come to naught. Neither Jeb Openbordersamnestycommoncore Bush or Marco Gangofeight Rubio will be the nominee. These people are very seriously deluded.

    Liked by 3 people

    • winky says:

      So sleazy looking

      Liked by 1 person

      • KBR says:

        On an interview before the debate, he was not smiling when the camera turned to him. He realized he was on, and quick, he pasted on that cheese-grin onto the same worried face. Didn’t have time to adjust the rest of his glum features to fake-smiley, I guess. It was so obvious, so fake, I laughed out loud.

        Like

  16. Betty says:

    If Jeb were to get the nomination in a brokered convention or if the GOPe simply say “It is our party and we will nominate who we want” what recourse do the rest of us registered republican have? Is it a law that only one person from a party can run in the general? Are there any loopholes?

    The democrats violated their own constitution at the Rules and By-Laws committee meeting in order to give Obama delegates to the convention which he hadn’t earned.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Betty says:

      if you watch the video look at the fat guy sitting by the lady with with the gavel – that is a Roosevelt, I found out later that he was/is in the insurance business.

      Like

    • I think this is the grandson of Harold Ickes, prime advisor to FDR, and a real piece of work. Long-time political-operative family.

      Also, this is exactly what the RNC did to the state of Florida in 2012. Took our two committeemen/women off the rules committee, and then had that same rules committee effect a change that would allow the Romney campaign to take away our duly elected delegates and replace them with those of Romney’s choosing. Completely criminal.

      Liked by 1 person

    • RINOKiller says:

      You want to see the biggest lawsuit the country has ever seen?

      Liked by 1 person

      • Betty says:

        Go up stream and read Lindenleelady’s link to get a glimpse of how they have thwarted our constitutional rights with “standing”.

        Like

    • wyntre says:

      That’s what turned me from a registered Dem to a registered Indy. I swore I would never vote for another dem after the DNC changed all the rules at the last moment to gift the POS the nomination.

      Now, of course, I wonder why it took me so long to understand the dim’s hypocrisy. Sadly, I now see the same thing happening with R’s.

      Liked by 1 person

  17. cali says:

    The globalists and their foot soldiers convinced themselves that they have it all figured out. They it posh somewhere slapping each others back and complimenting themselves in how ‘honorable and good’ they are.
    They could not be more wrong. They have not yet grasped the ever more intensifying ‘Cold Anger’ across America. The insurgency understands their war games an plans.

    Staying home in this most important election cycle is not an option. Sure – they will do anything to keep their self declared entitlement of power, control and money. Voter fraud is a sure thing although if the winning percentage points is around 10-15% – voter fraud nullifies itself and will not succeed.
    Donald Trump does not only receive support from the ‘vulgarians’ because he also receives lots of support from other americans outside the conservative grassroots. Taking a look at a couple of polls – Trump receives 27% of the black America vote as well as 37% of the Hispanic vote. No republican since Ronald Reagan received such a large perentage.

    One thing we need to keep in mind throughout all of this: We need to remove our self doubts and never let them see us sweat!
    We need to beat them in their own game because we have what it takes. Knowledge is power and the exposure of the GOPe strategy and their intentions as is laid out here by Sundance has made a far and wide impact.
    Yet – these scheisters still don’t take us seriously. Shame on them because I do believe we can and will beat them destroying their goal of their long sought after ‘one-world-government’.

    We have reached a point of no return; we have no choice but to give it our very best to retain this country.

    Liked by 2 people

    • KBR says:

      Trump likes : pray for it, then visualize it, then make it reality.
      Let’s do it that!

      Like

    • KBR says:

      Very important statement made ^^ so I want to repeat it outside the rest of your post:
      “If the winning percentage points is around 10-15%–voter fraud nullifies itself…!”

      Like

    • Betty says:

      “Shame on them because I do believe we can and will beat them destroying their goal of their long sought after ‘one-world-government’.’

      Sometimes you just have to acknowledge that God is our help in this.

      Liked by 1 person

  18. jackmcg says:

    The question is what happens if Rubio fails at his task? Despite being fawned over for a month now, his polls have been underwhelming.

    Side note: I spend too much time online and as such I read a lot of places that discuss politics. There is a very, very common anti-Trump trolling I see: After every debate or piece of Trump news, someone comments “Well, I’m done with Trump now after this, it looks like Rubio/Cruz/whoever is our best chance to beat Hillary”. I say troll because it is so obviously fake. Nobody is on the fence about Trump, you’re either in or you’re out and once you’re in, you’re in. Okay, a few people might be on the swing, but I see this concern trolling so frequently that they HAVE to be plants and shills. Call them out when you see it!

    Liked by 3 people

  19. KBR says:

    Yes even the MSM has reported that Trump supporters are steadfast, while others have “soft” supporters, that may easily change their minds before elections.

    Like

  20. Betty says:

    Is there any site that list the rules, state by state, for write in candidates? I do not want it to come to this, I think Donald Trump will win the GOP nomination in a continuous, glorious, succession of landslides – if we all do our part. Register republican, talk to others, wear a Trump hat. Go vote in the primary and take at least 4 other eligible voters along with you.

    But as Donald says – leverage is important and so is being prepared.

    In Minnesota to run as an independent candidate: “The Nominating Petition must be filed at least 77 days before State General Election Day (August 23, 2016).” The party’s 2016 convention will start Monday, July 18. A little over a month, but if everyone is ready.

    Write-In Candidates are easier:
    For write-in votes to be counted, a candidate for President of the United States must have filed a written request with the office of the Minnesota secretary of state by the seventh day before the General Election (November 1, 2016). (M.S. §204B.09, subd. 3(b))

    Like

    • Betty says:

      I meant to make a correction in reply and inadvertence “liked’ my own post.
      I broke a rule _ The party’s 2016 convention will start Monday, July 18.

      should read

      The Republican party’s 2016 convention will start Monday, July 18.

      Like

  21. Betty says:

    Wisconsin has a “sore loser”law. It seems if you lose the nomination of recognized party you can’t run as a candidate in another recognized party (keep in mind I am an idiot). But the sore lose law does not seem to apply to a presidential contest because of something Lyndon LaRouche did in 1992 – politics is like a box of chocolates.

    Here are write in rules for Wis.

    “A write-in candidate for the presidency must file a list of presidential electors and a declaration of candidacy in order to have his or her votes tallied. These forms must be filed with the Wisconsin Government Accountability Board by 4:30 p.m. on the second Tuesday preceding the general election. This deadline may be extended to the Friday following the election if the write-in candidate “is eligible to receive the electoral votes” of the state.[24].”

    http://ballotpedia.org/Ballot_access_requirements_for_presidential_candidates_in_Wisconsin#.22Sore_loser.22_laws

    [24] https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/8/185

    Like

  22. Betty says:

    Is a State that does not allow a write-in candidate to compete on election day demonstrating a partiality to a private political party?

    States that do not allow Presidential Write In Ballots are:
    Arkansas, Hawaii, Louisiana, Mississippi, Nevada, Oklahoma, South Dakota

    Is there any process/argument we can start right now to get those states to change to an impartial system?

    Like

  23. KBR says:

    Betty, you have good questions, and like to plan ahead against any eventuality. That’s great.
    But while you plan, keep visualizing a Trump win.

    Like

  24. keebler AC says:

    Wow, Rubio is way worse than Carson!

    From link above,

    Memo to Marco: It Ain’t the “Crime,” It’s the Cover-Up

    In 1987, a large drug ring bust was made of a cocaine kingpins who had murdered a narcotics investigator and dismembered his body. Ugh. Two of the individuals caught were his sister and his brother-in-law. Marco does not deny that he did cocaine in high school. In 2011, incriminating documents on his brother-in-law conveniently disappeared.

    Then we see Marco has a lackadaisical approach with his credit cards and showing up for work at the Senate. Wasn’t Obama the choom toker always missing in action as a Senator. They say absence from work is a sign of a user.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s