Understanding The Russian Disinformation Defense – As Predicted in 2018…

Various mainstream media reports have discussed the latest declassification releases by saying the releases show the Steele Dossier was infected with “Russian Disinformation”.

The framework of this “Russia disinformation” defense narrative is completely and utterly false.  The fabrications within the Steele Dossier assembly of lies, came almost exclusively from operatives in and outside government associated with the Clinton campaign; and a dedicated group of  purposeful allies in the intelligence community; who were attempting to weaponize intelligence, even false intelligence for similar political purposes.

However, that said, in 2018 CTH outlined this exact defense and why they would deploy it. Below I am re-posting a research outline from August 2018; and what you will find in the conclusion of the outline is this:

By doubling down on the Russian Collusion narrative the conspirators created a ‘catch-22’ defense. They could/can claim Deripaska was/is giving disinformation in his version of events to support the interests of Russia and sewing chaos in America etc. And any Republican who would give Deripaska a platform to tell what happened in 2016 would be doing the bidding of Vladimir Putin. See how that works?

The soft coup team protects themselves by impugning the motive of Deripaska, and diminishing his credibility under the auspices of Russian disinformation.

Sound familar?  Let’s revisit the 2018 entire outline and see how predictable this was.

~ Originally Written 2018 ~

Adam Waldman is the lawyer/lobbyist for Oleg Deripaska, the Russian billionaire who appears to be a key background player in the 2016 DOJ/FBI scheme against presidential candidate Donald Trump. Additionally, Mr. Waldman represents the U.S. interests of Christopher Steele, a contract employee of Deripaska and author of the Clinton-Steele Dossier that was used by the DOJ/FBI during their counterintelligence operation against presidential candidate Donald Trump.

Because of his centrality, Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley recently requested testimony from Mr. Adam Waldman, surrounding his contacts and engagements -with Deripaska, and by extension the DOJ/FBI- throughout the 2016/2017 operation to undermine and remove President Donald Trump.

In a response letter released August 18, 2018 (full pdf below) lawyers representing Mr. Waldman told Senator Chuck Grassley their client was “out of the country and not expected to return for several weeks.” SEE BELOW:

However, internet researcher/investigator almostjingo noticed that Mr. Waldman’s wife Barbara Sturm posted an instagram picture today of them dining with friends in New York last night, August 22, 2018:

(Link) Barbara Sturm second from left, husband Adam Waldman far right.

Whoopsie, apparently the letter from Mr. Waldman’s lawyers was intentionally false and simply an effort to avoid giving testimony to congress. Adam Waldman cannot be “out of the country for several weeks” and simultaneously having dinner in New York last night.

Here’s the full attorney letter:


Russian Oligarch Oleg Deripaska is a key figure at the epicenter of the DOJ and FBI activity that was taking place in 2016. Through his affiliates, lawyers and associates, Deripaska is directly connected to dossier author Christopher Steele, Fusion-GPS, and the collaborative FBI efforts of Andrew McCabe and Peter Strzok.

Adam Waldman (left) and Oleg Deripaska (right)

In the early 2016 text messages and email conversations between DOJ Official Bruce Ohr and Christopher Steele, the interests of Oleg Deripaska are a centerpiece of a quid-pro-quo where Deripaska gains a travel VISA and possible exemption from the Magnitsky Act in exchange for cooperation with the FBI effort against Donald Trump.

Adam Waldman was also the person in contact with corrupt Senate Intelligence Committee vice-chairman Mark Warner early in 2017 when the ‘insurance policy’ was deployed against newly elected President Donald Trump. As discovered in text messages, Waldman was the liaison, the person providing plausible deniability, between Senator Warner, Christopher Steele and Oleg Deripaska.

(Link to All Text Messages)

As many people are now aware, the SSCI is the most corrupt committee apparatus within congress; and as noted in the text messages, Adam Waldman only wanted to work with the Senate Intelligence Committee on his endeavors.

Within the Adam Waldman text messages to Senator Mark Warner, Waldman also notes the relationship between his client Christopher Steele and former Senate Intelligence Committee Vice-Chair Dianne Feinstein staffer, Daniel Jones.

Lawyer and Lobbyist Adam Waldman represents central figures: Oleg Deripaska, Christopher Steele and also Julian Assange. However, the connection between Waldman, Steele and Daniel Jones becomes additionally important.

You might remember that Daniel Jones raised $50 million to continue funding the Fusion-GPS investigation *AFTER* the 2016 election. It is likely part (perhaps most/all) of the money came from Oleg Deripaska, via his lawyer lobbyist Adam Waldman.

These are the types of questions that need to be answered. Hence, Senator Chuck Grassley requesting Mr. Waldman to appear and give testimony. However, it is the uncomfortable issues behind these questions that were apparently so concerning they led Waldman’s own lawyers to lie about his whereabouts.

It appears a little hypocritical for Mr. Waldman to be evading questioning considering it was Waldman who contacted journalist John Solomon earlier in the year to present a story conducive to his client Oleg Deripaska. He was full of information in May, 2018, but when facing questioning about that information in August – he disappears.

Waldman’s current triangulation is part of the reason for our earlier emphasis/warning on the construct of the May 2018 Solomon article. After all, everyone involved in the ‘soft coup attempt’ is desperate to safeguard their own interests.

Adam Waldman was representing Oleg Deripaska’s interests in the U.S. to politicians and officials. In May of 2018, John Solomon was contacted by Adam Waldman with a story about how the FBI contacted Deripaska for help in their Trump Russia investigation in September of 2016.

Keep in mind, this is Waldman contacting Solomon with a story.

Waldman told Solomon a story about how his client Oleg Deripaska was approached by the FBI in September of 2016 and asked for help with information about Paul Manafort and by extension Donald Trump. Within the backstory for the FBI and Deripaska was a prior connection between Robert Mueller and Deripaska in 2009.

Again, as you read the recap, remember this is Waldman contacting Solomon. Article Link Here – and my summary below:

♦In 2009 the FBI, then headed by Robert Mueller, requested the assistance of Russian billionaire Oleg Deripaska in an operation to retrieve former FBI officer and CIA resource Robert Levinson who was captured in Iran two years earlier. The agent assigned to engage Deripaska was Andrew McCabe; the primary FBI need was financing and operational support. Deripaska spent around $25 million and would have succeeded except the U.S. State Department, then headed by Hillary Clinton, backed out.

♦In September of 2016 Andrew McCabe is now Deputy Director of the FBI, when two FBI agents approached Deripaska in New York – again asking for his help. This time the FBI request was for Deripaska to outline Trump’s former campaign manager Paul Manafort as a tool of the Kremlin. Deripaska once hired Manafort as a political adviser and invested money with him in a business venture that went bad. Deripaska sued Manafort, alleging he stole money. However, according to the article, despite Deripaska’s disposition toward Manafort he viewed the request as absurd. He laughed the FBI away, telling them: “You are trying to create something out of nothing.”

This story, as told from the perspective of Adam Waldman -Deripaska’s lawyer/lobbyist- is important because it highlights a connection between Robert Mueller and Oleg Deripaska; a connection Mueller and the DOJ/FBI never revealed on their own.

I wrote about the ramifications of the Solomon Story HERE. Again, hopefully most will review; because there’s a larger story now visible with the new communication between Christopher Steele and Bruce Ohr.

It is likely that Oleg’s 2016 entry into the U.S. was facilitated as part of a quid-pro-quo; either agreed in advance, or, more likely, planned by the DOJ/FBI for later use in their 2016 Trump operation; as evidenced in the September 2016 FBI request. Regardless of the planning aspect, billionaire Deripaska is connected to Chris Steele, a source for Chris Steele, and likely even the employer of Chris Steele.

The FBI used Oleg Deripaska (source), and Oleg Deripaska used the FBI (visa).

Here’s where it gets interesting….

In that May article John Solomon reports that Deripaska wanted to testify to congress last year (2017), without any immunity request, but was rebuked. Who blocked his testimony?

In 2017 Oleg Deripaska was represented in the U.S. by Adam Waldman. Mr. Waldman was also representing Christopher Steele, the author of the Dossier. Waldman was the liaison Senator Mark Warner (Senate Intelligence Committee Vice-Chairman) was using to try and set up a secret meeting with Christopher Steele. {Text Messages}

As you can see from the text messages (more here), the House Intelligence Committee wanted to interview Deripaska. However, based on their ongoing contact and relationship Deripaska’s lawyer, Adam Waldman, asks Senate Intelligence Committee Vice-Chair Mark Warner for feedback.

Oleg Deripaska was blocked from testifying to congress. Now, it was obviously not from the HPSCI (Nunes Committee), but rather by the Senate Intel Committee, via Vice-Chair Senator Mark Warner. Oh yes, THAT Senator Mark Warner again.

Now, think about this…. Yes, with Oleg Deripaska in the picture there was indeed Russian meddling in the 2016 election; only, it wasn’t the type of meddling currently being sold. The FBI/DOJ were using Russian Deripaska to frame their Russian conspiracy narrative. It is almost a certainty that Deripaska was one of Chris Steele’s sources for the dossier.

Now, put yourself in Deripaska’s shoes and think about what happens AFTER candidate Donald Trump surprisingly wins the election.

All of a sudden Deripaska the asset becomes a risk to the corrupt Scheme Team (DOJ/FBI et al); especially as the DOJ/FBI then execute the “insurance policy” effort against Donald Trump…. and eventually enlist Robert Mueller.

It is entirely possible for a Russian to be blackmailing someone, but it ain’t Trump vulnerable to blackmail; it’s the conspiracy crew within the DOJ and FBI. Deripaska now has blackmail material on Comey, McCabe and crew.

After the 2017 (first year) failure of the “insurance policy” it now seems more likely President Trump will outlive the soft coup. In May 2018, Oleg tells Waldman to call John Solomon and tell him the story from a perspective favorable to Deripaska.

As the story is told, in 2017 Oleg was more than willing to testify to congress… likely laughing the entire time… but the corrupt participants within congress damned sure couldn’t let Deripaska testify. Enter corrupt SSCI Vice-Chairman Mark Warner:

Um, we’ve got a problem here Mark…

The Russians (Deripaska) really do have leverage and blackmail… but it ain’t over Trump. Oleg has blackmail on Comey, McCabe and conspiracy crew. Oleg Deripaska must be kept away from congress and away from exposing the scheme.

Guess who else must be controlled and/or kept away from congress?

Julian Assange.

Assange has evidence the Russians didn’t hack the DNC.

Between Deripaska’s first-hand knowledge of the DOJ/FBI work on both the Dossier and the DOJ/FBI intention for his use as a witness; and Julian Assange’s first-hand knowledge of who actually took the DNC email communication;… well, the entire Russian narrative could explode in their faces.

Control is needed.

You can almost hear the corrupt U.S. intelligence officials calling their U.K. GCHQ partners in Britain and yelling at them to do something, anything, and for the love of God, shut down Assange’s access to the internet STAT…. Yeah, funny that.

Now, who moves into position to control Julian Assange?

Well, well, well…. Lookie here? Who dat? Apparently the SSCI wants to interview WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, in a closed session. Signed by none-other than our corrupt-o-crats Richard Burr and Mark Warner. Yeah, funny that.

Lest anyone need a reminder…. “The most corrupt part of congress is the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI). The SSCI is the center of the deepest part of the Deep State swamp. The SSCI never, ever, E.V.E.R… does anything that does not protect and advance the self-interest of the corrupt Washington DC professional political class.”

Now do we see why the SSCI is the center of protecting the entire fraudulent apparatus?

It’s somewhat humorous to look at this fiasco from the perspective of Oleg Deripaska. He must be having a lot of laughs with his Ruskie friends about these stupid Americans and how the intelligence apparatus of the United States of America is controlled by corrupt politicians trying to save themselves and the corrupt institutions.

The Russians, notorious for sowing discord, are being used as a shield from sunlight upon actions taken by U.S. own intelligence officers: James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Loretta Lynch, Sally Yates, John Brennan, James Clapper etc.

There’s a reason why I keep emphasizing the source of the John Solomon story was Adam Waldman. Think about it from the perspective of the conspiracy group reading how Oleg instructed Waldman to present his story.

With Deripaska telling Solomon how the FBI contacted him; the background of their prior collaborative relationship; and the likelihood of Deripaska giving information to Chris Steele for the dossier; the scheme team really, really, needed to double down on the Russian conspiracy narrative in case Oleg ever did testify to congress.

By doubling down on the Russian Collusion narrative the conspirators created a ‘catch-22’ defense. They could/can claim Deripaska was/is giving disinformation in his version of events to support the interests of Russia and sewing chaos in America etc. And any Republican who would give Deripaska a platform to tell what happened in 2016 would be doing the bidding of Vladimir Putin. See how that works?

The soft coup team protects themselves by impugning the motive of Deripaska, and diminishing his credibility under the auspices of Russian disinformation.

This entry was posted in Big Government, Big Stupid Government, CIA, Clinton(s), Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Donald Trump, Donald Trump Transition, Election 2016, Election 2020, FBI, IG Report Comey, IG Report FISA Abuse, IG Report McCabe, Legislation, media bias, Notorious Liars, President Trump, propaganda, Russia, Spygate, Spying, THE BIG UGLY, Typical Prog Behavior, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

204 Responses to Understanding The Russian Disinformation Defense – As Predicted in 2018…

  1. Kaco says:

    I can’t see how they can use “Russian disinformation” as an excuse, they had plenty of opportunity to check their sources; furthermore, the reports show, they knew it was not good, and yet, they continued on with their objective.

    Also, another reason to go to the origin, they just wanted a script to go on, whether it was made up or not.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Bogeyfree says:

      Remember intent?

      That’s all they need is a small window of plausible deniability and the MSM will do the rest.

      IMO it all depends on Barr.

      Does he come out with a jack hammer or one of those play hammers kids have?

      Liked by 1 person

      • Kaco says:

        Yes, I think there is plenty of ammo there for Barr, he can refer to this website, but he should have even more.

        So, grand juries are secret, but what about indictments? Would we know if someone has been indicted?

        Liked by 1 person

        • Issy says:

          There could be sealed indictments. We would not know unless arrest were made. I am not confident a D.C. grand jury would even vote for indictment. I don’t know if an indictment is even required in federal law. I don’t believe it’s required in my state for criminal cases on the local level. It gives the prosecutor cover.


  2. kleen says:

    Deripaska may be a bad guy, but he is not taking one for Hillary’s team. She is a nobody right now.

    He will not be the fall guy just to be nice, What’s in it for him? What does he get? The swamp is not in charge right now to promise him anything.

    Liked by 2 people

  3. thedoc00 says:

    Its like an old 1950’s western. The settlers and soldiers are surrounded by Indians playing drums and making whoopee with whisky. Old and wise Gabby Hayes would advise every to get some sleep because when the drums stop, all heck is going to break loose.

    Fast forward to today … Chief Tick Tock Hanity is telling us Indians just wait until AG Barr stops playing the bagpipes and we will scalp them all….


  4. kleen says:

    The swamp’s trick to getting away with crimes was to hide under classified info, redacted docs.

    They could do whatever they wanted and then redact the crimes and no one would EVER catch them. That’s why they had the arrogant attitude in their faces. They were untouchable.

    Those days are over.

    POTUS gave Barr the authority to declassify anything.

    Now we have Greenell. The swamp’s secrets are out, hiding like they used to is no longer an option.

    Liked by 3 people

    • rickinhouston says:

      This is why Steele was asking, “Are the firewalls going to hold”?

      Does McCabe, Comey, Ohr, Wray, Rosenstein, Horowitz, et al. still have my back on this? Are you all going to continue to cover up the trail I’ve left behind?

      Liked by 1 person

  5. Randall Phillips says:

    Overall, Sundance make an important point. Talk about Russian disinformation is designed to imply that the coup plotters were taken in. The following is relatively trivial, and not meant to distract from the whole. It shows what deceptive scumbags Waldman and Page are.

    When Rodney Page wrote to Senator Grassley that Waldman was, “out of the country and not expected to return to Washington for several weeks,” he used a lawyer trick to trigger the false assumption that Waldman was not returning to the US for several weeks. It Washington he wasn’t EXPECTED to return to for weeks, not the USA. As written, the letter is consistent with Waldman being in NEW YORK for dinner the next day. The word “expected” gives Waldman an out — the letter doesn’t say Waldman will NOT be in Washington, just that some unnamed entity doesn’t expect it. Page and Waldman are skilled deceivers, as befits lawyers for international criminals. Never take a single word they spew at face value.

    Liked by 3 people

  6. signer1 says:

    Fit the false info, fit it to your narrative. Fake news, beyond fake governmebt. Its like AA, perpetuate beyond reasonlable thinking. I said thinking, not feeling!. Company first.


  7. mtg50 says:

    Of course they were always going to double-down on Russian disinformation as a defense. But that would never sustain a real investigation of their actions and declassification of needed documents.Durham is conducting a real investigation and declassification has already happened. There is no valid predicate for their actions.This post is behind the times.

    Liked by 2 people

    • guest4ever says:

      mtg50–I can see your point. HOWEVER, we here in the U.S. are still pretty tuned into our electronic media, and that includes all the garbage out there (not to insult garbage mind you). I think a LOT of this is obviously meant for the, “uninformed” (or should I say misinformed), who have accepted the propoganda, lock, stock, and barrel.


  8. Bogeyfree says:

    The Russia Collusion investigation by Durham WILL NEVER get you the top dogs.

    Because the real crimes that incriminate the top dogs came about back in 2009.

    If you don’t investigate those you NEVER get the TOP DOGS IMO.

    We have spent four years to possibly get middlemen and allowed the real evidence, Uranium One the U-1 Whistleblowers, Hammer Program, Montgomery WB, 47 Hard Drives and even the Wiener Laptop all to silenced.

    Liked by 2 people

    • TheLastDemocrat says:

      To me, turning the corner and exposing Muh Russia as a totally fabricated hoax investigation is the cork to be popped, allowing exposure of all of these. U1, F/F, how the IRS targeting “Tea Party” 501-c-4 campaign actually developed (no self-respecting G14 compromises the opportunity for the fat government retirement by behaving like that – it came from much higher), etc.

      Turn the corner: requires Muh Russia as being: hoax, and being for political purposes. This invalidates the credibility of Brennan, and everybody. Firewalls will be gone and we can actually learn about U1, F/F, IRS/Tea Party, Bundy/BLM, etc.

      Liked by 1 person

  9. Why hasn’t a Conservative Senator filed an ethics complaint against Warner? It’s a start and would force Warner OFF the committee until an investigation is completed…

    Liked by 3 people

    • Excellent question. The answer is above my pay grade!

      Liked by 2 people

    • Issy says:

      The United States Senate is a powerful, exclusive club. They are in it together, and anyone who has been there more than two terms is corrupt or complicit. Some are before they serve a day. They usually arrived there from the farm team in deep state politics.

      Their only interest is getting reelected and acquiring more power and wealth. They don’t rat on each other, and they do what Mitch allows them to do.

      If you think your senator is different, watch the votes and the donor list.


  10. The amount of Lawyers involved in this provable corruption is staggering….and not one has had their Law License suspended or revoked at a bare minimum…..

    Liked by 2 people

    • kleen says:

      Hopefully some come from good families, and won’t want to embarrass them so they will come clean, do the right thing, and cooperate. Make it right.

      Hopefully. All we need is one or 2.

      Liked by 1 person

  11. trnathens says:

    My guesses:

    (1) Waldman is cooperating with the investigation;

    (2) Successful negotiation with Assange, Deripaska, Daniels, and Steel and Durham;

    (3) Confirmation, with admissible evidence, corroborates and leads to “We got ’em,” statement;

    Liked by 1 person

  12. kleen says:

    It might works as far media scam is concerned. Maddow may use this to avoid reporting the truth, it’s a good distraction. But it won’t work as far as legal defense matter, if Durham is serious about justice. But yeah… public brainwashing yes, good plan by the terrorists.

    Liked by 1 person

  13. pawatcher says:

    Paul Manafort was intrigal—->The real beginning—–>Too bad you missed Paul Manafort’s link to the Bush cartel—-> then you missed the links to—–>Oleg Deripaska—–> Waldman——-> Iran——>Russia——-> CIA——->Levinson——> McCain——-> Steele——->Mueller——-> and then right into Trump’s lap to start the COUP——>well it really started with the Russian dossier to be used by !Jeb, then passed to Hillary—–>then it became the impetus/security policy for the coup. ALL to get rid of Trump to save the NWO——> too bad they are going to lose and lose bigly IMHO.
    Sundance please do the research on the Bush Cartel it links them to the slaughter of Sarah Palin’s career and the attempted coup against Trump——-> the Bush Cartel is danger personified.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Fubu says:

      Good gawd, man. Take a number and go to the back of the line. Right behind the Clinton Crime Cartel, Obama and their cronies, the Coup Group, and China, to name a few. The Bushes are so yesterday. Besides, W is too busy making goo goo eyes at Michelle to be taken seriously.


  14. kleen says:

    I don’t see how, crimes committed by a large group of people, can stay hidden.

    Think about it. Dozens of people involved. 50-60 people? I lost count.

    How would you hide a group crime? Documents all over the place, texts… It’s impossible UNLESS Barr and Durham want to help cover-up.

    But honestly there’s no way. It takes one person to open their yapper and they all go down. The finger pointing will get out of control. Once one person talks, their lie will have to be adjusted and that’s when it falls apart.

    They can’t all have the same story, Docs don’t match it. Those who handled the docs will have to explain it. Then what?

    Liked by 1 person

  15. pocaMAGAjunta says:

    Comey: I still cannot believe we were fooled by the Russians. I guess we just expect everyone to be as honest as the FBI. All we were trying to do was to protect the integrity of our system for selecting, I mean electing, the next President. To paraphrase the great Abraham Lincoln, you can fool some of the people some of the time, but you can fool the FBI all of the time.


  16. Midnite says:

    Reading through the Halper/PapaD transcript this morning it struck me as odd that the DOJ would Redact most of the conversation these two had about Seth Rich. What purpose does it serve and why do it? If you’re interested it starts at the bottom of page 10.

    Halper gets 2 points for being a smartass with his comment at the end “Chalk up another one for the Clintons”.

    Click to access 2020-3-13%20FISA%20Senate%20-%20Transcript%20of%20George%20Papadopoulos%20and%20FBI%20Confidential%20Human%20Source%20declassified%20March%2013%202020.pdf


  17. minnesotamike55 says:

    OK, I’ll go back in time too. The Russians were paid for dirt on Trump by Hillary and company. The Russians were also not so much against Trump but FOR Hillary, because they had so much dirt they could control her, but not PDJT. So, they tried very hard to make up the most ridiculous claim that would be barely believable, got paid for it, and some Dems actually believed it. Then the Russians rolled on the floor in laughter and money because, “those stupid Americans fell for it”, we want them in office!
    I wouldn’t call it disinformation. I would call it “the Russians punked stupid Hillary”. If you look at how the left all believed the climate change predictions, Y2K, hurricane predictions, stock market tanking if Trump elected, and so on, you can understand how the Russians may have thought that “if” they went with the fake dirt and actually got elected, they would have one more thing to hold over Hillary’s head. It was a no lose for them. Have some fun, get some money, and if it worked, Ha, Ha, she so stupid, we take big laugh now..


  18. Jennifer Verner says:

    My guess is that Sidney Blumenthal and Cody Shearer made the whole thing up then passed it along to their buddy Steele, through Glenn Simpson, to give it polish. Nellie Ohr and Glenn Simpson added detail. Deripaska hired Adam Waldman in the first place because of his proximity to Hillary. His prize was going to be the golden Visa, so he could come and go to the US at will. He was not passing in Russian disinformation, he was trying to be helpful to Hillary’s black-ops team. THEY ALL thought she was going to win. This dossier garbage and the FBI investigation were black ops meant to be reported in the press during the campaign to take Trump down. They even used the same team that they used in Plamegate—including Isakoff and Corn and Comey and Mueller—and their friends at the CIA. When this is said and done all roads go back to Hillary, with Obama giving his blessings, and Soros giving millions to finance the entire cabal. And I believe that Priestap is going to end up playing a much bigger role than we realize, especially when you remember who his wife is and who she supports.


    • J.Thomas says:

      With all of the ranso internet stuff in there, it’s likely that much of the dossier was a result of NSA 702 ‘about’ queries, spat out to Clintonites Shearer and Blumenthal, and then laundered through someone like Ohr on the way back in. NSA output->Clintonites/FusionGPS (betcha Glenn Simpson assembled the dossier) + Brennan Task Force to set up a parallel construction to the NSA info (Halper, Mifsud, Downer,& co) -> Slap Steele’s face on it -> input to FBI.

      It’s really pretty devious.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s