Chairman Devin Nunes Discusses Rod Rosenstein…

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes appears with Laura Ingraham to discuss the ongoing congressional issues with Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein. Chairman Nunes notes the motives and intents of the DOJ to hide the information within the previous declassification directive.

.

Exposing the FBI/DOJ dirty deeds is a major priority for a contingent within congress and a multitude of Trump supporters.  Therefore HPSCI Chairman Devin Nunes and Trump supporters have differing sets of priorities than President Trump.

Reminder:

“I met with the DOJ concerning the declassification of various UNREDACTED documents.”

President Trump meeting with DOJ, meaning Rod Rosenstein. Notice “various unredacted documents”. Heavily referencing section 3 and 4 of the declassification directive.

“They agreed to release them but stated that so doing may have a perceived negative impact on the Russia probe.”

DOJ saying they will release; but note the word “perceived negative impact”. The full sunlight (full release) would undermine the legitimacy of Robert Mueller. DOJ doesn’t want to undermine the fraudulent Mueller investigation. Rosenstein is now admitting to the President, that Muellers probe is illegitimate.

“Also, key Allies’ called to ask not to release.”

As noted , likely the U.K and Australian government are both concerned and embarrassed at the exploitation that took place. Christopher Steele (U.K), Alexander Downer (AU) etc.

The collaborative ‘spy-gate’ operation (crossfire hurricane) between the CIA, FBI and DOJ-NSD is an embarrassment; and globally no-one knows the extent to which the FISA and Five-Eyes process is used, manipulated and abused.

Key point. Trump now has the leverage.

When wondering what President Trump will do with the leverage he now carries, think back to how Donald Trump (apex predator) always holds leverage for maximum impact at specifically chosen (by him) pressure points. Trump carries leverage like currency; he withdraws from positions when he gains leverage. The ability to deploy leverage at a time of his choosing is the power; the position which creates the leverage is not as powerful, and thereby discarded.

“Therefore, the Inspector General has been asked to review these documents on an expedited basis.”

DOJ (Rosenstein) tells Trump in exchange for you withholding this weapon, we will tell our IG to rush forward with his investigation. The DOJ seems to be indicating they will allow Michael Horowitz to put more damaging verbiage in his report this time.

“I believe he will move quickly on this (and hopefully other things which he is looking at).”

POTUS Trump accepts the position of the DOJ; puts the leverage in his arsenal; and then pressures the DOJ to work with Horowitz and hurry-the-hell-up with the report.

“In the end I can always declassify if it proves necessary.”

If the corrupt interests within the DOJ and FBI do not uphold their end of the bargain, POTUS retains the ability to deploy the original declassification directive…. if the outcome of the IG report is not forthcoming; or if the outcome does not match the truth; he will trigger the declassification.

It is within this section where all those who understand the truth get rightly, and understandably, worried that the DOJ will renege on the deal they just made with Trump.

“Speed is very important to me – and everyone!”

Everyone understands this could have election impact. Trump telling the corrupt DOJ to get the truth in front of the American people as soon as possible.

Again, President Trump views these events as gaining him massive leverage toward the accusations against him by Robert Mueller. Don’t look at this through the prism of Trump supporters – look at this through the prism of President Trump.

Robert Mueller has been held over President Trump’s head like a sword of Damocles for more than a year.  Leverage over Mueller is worth withdrawing the declassification directive in exchange for allowing the FBI and DOJ to manage how the institutional corruption surfaces.

Robert Mueller (the entire team) was put into place, carefully selected by James Baker and Andrew McCabe, specifically to cover for the DOJ and FBI activity that preceded the firing of James Comey.   Mueller’s role has two essential aspects:

♦(1) Create an investigation – Just by creating the investigation it is then used as a shield by any corrupt FBI/DOJ official who would find himself/herself under downstream congressional investigation.  Former officials being deposed/questioned by IG Horowitz or Congress could then say they are unable to answer those questions due to the ongoing special counsel investigation.  In this way Mueller provides cover.

♦(2)  Use the investigation to keep any and all inquiry focused away from the corrupt DOJ and FBI activity that took place in 2016, 2016, 2017.  Keep the media narrative looking somewhere, anywhere, other than directly at the epicenter of the issues.

In both of these objectives the Mueller special counsel has been stunningly effective.

All of the visible activity being conducted by Rosenstein has been an intentional effort to keep as much of the corrupt evidence hidden from public review.  When Nunes points out that Rosenstein’s motives are to keep the documentary evidence classified he is speaking directly to this aspect.

But the current corrupt DOJ activity is not isolated to FISA abuse and documents the usurping officials want to keep hidden.  The corrupt activity also flows outward and can be found in the DOJ behavior surrounding James Wolfe; the busted Senate Intelligence Security Official who was caught leaking the classified FISA application to the media.

The reason Wolfe was not indicted for the more serious charges of leaking classified intelligence is because the *CURRENT* DOJ needs to hide what was taking place.  Wolfe is simply a benefactor of current DOJ officials who need to hide their fingerprints and activity in 2016 and 2017.

Those currently corrupt DOJ and FBI officials are not protecting Wolfe as much as they are protecting themselves.  This includes Rosenstein, FBI Director Christopher Wray, Deputy FBI Director David Bowditch and current FBI general counsel Dana Boente; as well as all the second level and third level carry-over career officials.  The failure to accept this currently corrupt DOJ and FBI is where most of the “Stealth Jeff” and “Q” believers are entirely wrong.

The efforts of Rosenstein, Wray, Bowditch, Boente et al, to cover-up the institutional corruption extends far beyond their blocking activity of the declassification requests; and shows up in the lack of substance behind the Wolfe indictment and the ability of the external Lawfare group, former officials, to influence current activity.

Part of that current influence is keeping the most severe elements of investigative sunlight away from review.  These officials have done this in many visible ways.  Three of them are inarguable:

(1) By redacting innocuous, albeit highly damaging information, within the Lisa Page and Peter Strzok text messages and emails.  Officials within the agencies are hiding information and even eliminating the most damaging material.

(2) By controlling what records IG Horowitz has access to; in addition to who he is interviewing. The IG is only as effective as the material he has to review.

(3) By shaping the executive summaries of the two previous IG reports to ensure the specific material within the report is diluted as much as possible in the summary and conclusions.

The collaborative efforts of the current group of corrupt officials is also evident in the hit job against Judge Brett Kavanaugh.  Those corrupt former DOJ/FBI officials (Bromwich, McLean, Laufman, etc.), who are part of the Blasey-Ford construct, were clearly working with a set of current officials. [This collaborative interest extends to people within government (the legislative branch) and those outside government (media allies).]

The appearance of former DOJ lawyer Michael Sussmann working with Perkins Coie and on behalf of the DNC, to feed information to former FBI legal counsel James Baker, only highlights this systemic collaboration and corruption within the DOJ and FBI.   That corruption has not been addressed; it is currently being protected from sunlight.

On March 2nd, 2017, AG Jeff Sessions met with a group of DOJ officials who helped him make the decision to recuse himself (meeting schedule below).  As a seemingly intended result, AG Jeff Sessions became irrelevant within any effort to ferret out the corrupt officials who participated in the soft-coup attempt.

As a specific outcome of that recusal decision, DAG Rod Rosenstein, FBI Director Christopher Wray, Deputy FBI Director David Bowditch, FBI Chief Legal Counsel Dana Boente, Special Counsel Robert Mueller and the affiliated network of political operatives within the DOJ and FBI had free reign to shape everything in the past two years.

Almost all of the recent discoveries from congressional testimony surround the DOJ and FBI efforts to target President Trump; and the downstream efforts to hide the targeting.

This is the current state of the issue.

From President Trump’s perspective the thorn in his administration has been Special Counsel Robert Mueller.  Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein created the special counsel under fraudulent pretense.  That origination material (Ohr 302’s, FISA pages, origination EC, and Page/Strzok messages) is now a risk to the Deputy AG.

DAG Rosenstein does not want his involvement in the fraud to be exposed; hence his request to block/stall/delay the declassification directive. However, at any time President Trump can declassify all the documents and outline the fraudulent basis that originated the special counsel. This is essentially President Trump’s leverage.

The ongoing efforts of the FBI and DOJ to hide their malfeasance, does not interrupt or impede Trump’s MAGA agenda; the special counsel does. Having leverage over the special counsel is more valuable than exposing the soft-coup plotters.

If the corrupt current and previous FBI and DOJ officials are laid naked to their enemies, great; but from President Trump’s unique perspective it does not appear to be a priority.

Exposing the FBI/DOJ dirty deeds is a major priority for a contingent within congress and a multitude of Trump supporters – but for the office of the President, in the immediate future, not-so-much.

When you have this much leverage on someone, you don’t want them to quit. You want to use their damaged and tenuous position to your advantage. President Trump is in no hurry to fire Rosenstein (not yet), because the DAG is so weak and President Trump holds all the leverage in the relationship.

Rod Rosenstein knows what he did wrong; and President Trump knows what Rosenstein did wrong. Though it could change based on new discoveries of how far the DAG went along within the soft-coup process, President Trump isn’t likely to let Rosenstein go until everyone else knows what Rosenstein did wrong.

On March 28th, 2018, the DOJ Office of Inspector General Michael Horowitz formerly announced an additional investigation of how the U.S. Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation engaged with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) in matters relating to the FISA Title-1 application filed against U.S. person Carter Page.  However, one part of the OIG notification was generously overlooked by a defensive and IC compliant media:

As part of this examination, the OIG also will review information that was known to the DOJ and the FBI at the time the applications were filed from or about an alleged FBI confidential source. Additionally, the OIG will review the DOJ’s and FBI’s relationship and communications with the alleged source as they relate to the FISC applications.  (pdf link)

Two months later on Monday May 21st, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein added a significant DOJ mandate to the Inspector General review.  Rosenstein expanded the original FISA review to include looking at whether officials within the intelligence community may have unlawfully used human intelligence assets to “spy” or “surveil” the Trump campaign:

“The Department has asked the Inspector General to expand the ongoing review of the FISA application process to include determining whether there was any impropriety or political motivation in how the FBI conducted its counterintelligence investigation of persons suspected of involvement with the Russian agents who interfered in the 2016 presidential election.” (link)

The IG process for the FISA report is structural.  Once the interviews and investigation is complete the “IG referencer” phase takes several weeks.  The referencer could be a person or a group of people depending on the size of the report.

The referencer has the responsibility for going through every statement of fact and providing the citation or footnote for the assertion. The person(s) doing the reference review has/have the most arduous of tasks.

The referencer checks every sentence, every assertion, and ensures only provable facts with citations are part of the report. Every assertion of fact must be cited (or footnoted) to include the investigative material that proves the fact.  After the footnotes, citations and all fact assemblies are reconciled a draft report is written. The Draft Report encompasses the findings.

The Draft Report is then sent to the principals to review.  The Draft Report review allows the principals to provide input on the facts identified and outlined within the draft.  This part of the process takes at least two weeks.  Responses from the principals about the facts outlined in the draft report are then reviewed, cleared for addition if appropriate, and included in the final report.  Then the final report goes to print.

The election is 29 days away from today.  There is almost no way the IG report on FISA abuse and “spygate” will be completed prior to the mid-term election.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in AG Jeff Sessions, Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Clinton(s), Cold Anger, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Desperately Seeking Hillary, Donald Trump, Donald Trump Transition, Election 2016, Election 2018, IG Report FISA Abuse, Jeff Sessions, Legislation, media bias, Notorious Liars, President Trump, Spygate, Spying, THE BIG UGLY, TowerGate, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

443 Responses to Chairman Devin Nunes Discusses Rod Rosenstein…

  1. notunderwhelmed says:

    This is off-topic. I just read that 5-6 tycoons are donating to the DNC. I donate frequently to conservative organizations, the RNC, Trump PACs, etc. How many conservative tycoons contribute to the RNC or conservative organizations? Where are our tycoons– or are they all globalists who could care less about the republic?

    Liked by 1 person

    • Our “tycoons” are the small business owners. As you probably know, 70% of businesses are “small” businesses. IMHO even though our businesses are smaller, the combined volume of contributions from this large number of “small businesses” IMHO should vastly outweigh legal contributions from megadonors. If you insist on megadonors, how about Trump or the fickle Koch bros or that Fox owner whose name I forget…..

      Liked by 1 person

    • MGBSE says:

      I am of the opinion, that is the one thing puppet-obama did do – with our taxes and insider trading – he created RAT billionaires and millionaires…they have dozens of billionaires and thousands of millionaires….while the majority of their voters are illegals, convicted felons welfare dependent…true globalists!

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Finbar O'Shaunnessey says:

    This whole thing with RR is like the Saturday matinee serials. Last week I saw VSGPDJT throw RR out of AF1. This week AF1 lands and the two of them are buddy-buddy. I can’t wait for next week. Plus there’s free dishes.

    Like

  3. Another Scott says:

    President Trump is not playing 4D chess. He’s strategic but he lives in the real world. One of his strengths is he can battle through things that go wrong like Jeff Sessions. People in past administrations played 4D chess and lived in the ivory tower academic world. That’s why they were bad at handling things that went wrong like Benghazi and the 2016 election.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. T man says:

    I keep hearing that people are putting this in their pocket, or holding leverage over people, or that the truth will soon come out, or there is a reckoning coming, or people will go to jail or things were done illegally, or there are sealed indictments, or people are being investigated, or the report is coming.

    What I don’t hear is people being being indicted or held otherwise accountable other than people being fired or demoted. Somehow being fired for trying to illegally influence an election or overthrow the government doesn’t really sound like accountability or deterrence.

    Liked by 1 person

    • G. Combs says:

      DO you want low level rats to go to court with Department of Justice – Social Justice Warriors left over from Obummer prosecuting and Crooked PC Judges tossing out evidence and blocking witnesses left and right thereby guaranteeing the low level rats will be found NOT GUILTY? (And therefore can never be tried again.)

      OR

      Do you want President Trump and HIS Small team to unravel the rats nest and find the King Pins hiding in the shadows? Get his 400+ nominees confirmed including over 140 federal judges…

      AND

      with a lot of luck and Deplorables raising a major ruckus get the DARN LAWS protecting Corrupt employees and the laws ALLOWING Government Employee Unions CHANGED!

      Daily CallerHere’s Why It’s All But Impossible To Fire A Fed

      “Federal workers are far more likely to be audited by the IRS or get arrested for drunk driving than they are to be fired from the civil service payroll for poor performance or misconduct.

      The odds are one-in-175 for the IRS audit and one-in-200 for the drunk driving arrest, while the odds for a fed to be fired in a given year are one-in-500…..

      Private sector workers face just the opposite situation. They have a roughly one-in-77 chance of being involuntarily terminated….

      With such odds, it’s no wonder that bureaucratic horror stories are so common. The Daily Caller News Foundation, for example, recently reported Environmental Protection Agency officials let an employee convicted of stealing thousands of dollars worth of equipment from the EPA back to work after a 30-day suspension. Another EPA employee was convicted of sneaking marijuana and marijuana pipes into a federal facility, but went back to work after a 21-day suspension….”

      You can’t drain the Deep State Swamp UNTIL YOU CHANGE THE DANG LAWS‼️

      And it is OUR JOBS to make sure that happens.

      Liked by 2 people

  5. Curt says:

    I hope your summation of President Trump’s motives regarding the “worm/weasel” Rosenstein are correct. One would have to be blind to NOT see what ALL these intelligence were doing to frame this president. There is a huge conspiracy here to pull off a “soft coup” as Sundance puts it. For me personally, I would rather see those doing criminal acts, trying to destroy a legitimate election and a Democratically elected President, exposed and brought to justice. I believe in Donald Trump, but I pray he doesn’t over play his hand. If the mid terms go badly (which I don’t think they will) he loses a great deal of his leverage. If the House goes to the Democrats, as it very well may, his support from the House Intelligence Committee will evaporate. Trump, himself, has called these Democrats “evil” and as we’ve recently seen in the Kavanaugh hearings, that is no exaggeration! I’m in the camp that would prefer to see sunlight shined on all this criminal activity, even if it embarrasses our intelligence agencies and the UK or Australia. So what! This can NEVER be allowed to occur again in our Republic and the most effective way to stop it is by complete exposure…………..

    Like

  6. OldParatrooper says:

    I’m still waiting for someone to tell us what was in the first FISA application(s), the ones that were rejected in June and July 2016. Did Steele provide sufficient detail in an early memo, or was it something else? And what did the FBI do when rejected? Call the DNC and ask for more evidence? Was Baker’s meeting with the DNC lawyers where the need to hire Orbis was determined?

    Like

  7. Brian P.T. Blake says:

    President Trump knows what he’s doing and I trust him implicitly, but his strategy is beyond me. In my dreams, he will announce tonight that AG Sessions is resigning and that Trump is appointing a street-wise, attack-dog prosecutor to replace him and begin issuing indictments, starting with Hillary. We’ll know soon enough.

    Like

    • G. Combs says:

      AHHHhhhh, but with all the sealed indictments being churned out since AG Sessions appointed Huber we really have ZERO idea of what is happening behind the scenes. Remember ONE indictment can be for multiple people and multiple crimes. (Or not be connected to a crime at all.)

      There is also President Trump’s Military Tribunal EO going into effect next year and ❣️Supreme Court Justice❣️ Kavanaugh’s answers to Senator Graham’s questions about Military Tribunals.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s