It is not my intention to provide black pills. However, we discuss events through the prism of what exists, what we can see and track, rather than what we pretend might be in place.  Thus, today CTH fires a signal flare drawing attention away from precinct voting polling places, and toward tabulation centers.

There is some alarming evidence beginning to surface pointing toward a shift in the USA election process, specifically the fundamentally changed process that now exists behind absentee balloting.

The events in California for the 2018 midterm election appeared to be the original BETA test of mass mail-in ballot collection.  Every person in the state mailed a ballot for completion in the 2018 election cycle.  The outcome was evident for two weeks after election day when ballots continuing to arrive changed the vote outcome.

The 2020 general election then saw, thanks to COVID-19, a nationwide rollout of the BETA test: balloting 2.0.  Millions of households receiving ballots from state election officials, so the socially distant electorate did not need to assemble and vote on election day.  The process created a widespread opportunity for fraud.

In the 2022 midterm election, this absentee balloting system was still in place; affirmed into a new structural process within each state.  An awakening electorate pondered the absence of the predicted “red wave” and recognized there was a distinct difference between voters and ballots.  In general, the republicans were still focused on voters, but the democrats were focused on ballot submission processes.  2022 was essentially the third iteration from the originating California BETA test: balloting 3.0.

After 2022, playing catchup, nationwide attention shifted away from votes and election day, and people started talking about the importance of ballot distribution, collection and submission.  This has been the messaging system going into election day 2024.  However, there are strong, evidence-based reasons to believe ‘Balloting 4.0’ is something else entirely.  Election integrity officials could very well be focusing their efforts on polling and balloting processes that have moved far beyond where they were even just two short years ago.

(more…)

Dominion voting access terminals were notorious in the 2020 election for demonstrable issues that led to compromises in the voting process. Unfortunately, those voting problems associated with Dominion appear to be carrying over into the 2024 election.

Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson explains how there is a “nationwide issue” with Dominion systems preventing voters from making certain selections. According to Benson, this glitch cannot be fixed. WATCH:

🚨 NEW: Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson says there is a “NATIONWIDE ISSUE with Dominion Voter Access Terminals,” preventing voters from making certain selections.

Of course there is 🙄

According to her office, this “programming issue” CANNOT be fixed, and voters are… pic.twitter.com/O6HPChDMbK

— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) October 30, 2024

.

(more…)

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled today allowed Virginia to continue its purge of more than 1,600 ineligible voters from the state’s voter rolls. [pdf ruling here]

The stay was issued 6 to 3, along ideological lines, with leftist Justices Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissenting with the opinion that illegal aliens and ineligible voters should be permitted to cast ballots.

[Source]

BACKGROUND – On August 7th, Virginia’s Governor Glenn Youngkin signed an executive order expediting the removal of noncitizens from the state’s voter rolls. The state maintained that the program followed only removed those who were ineligible to vote due to lack of citizenship.  These were self-declared ineligible voters.

Earlier this month the Justice Department and advocacy groups intervened, suing the state.  They contended that Virginia had purged some eligible voters and that it did so in violation of a federal law that bars removals from voting rolls in the 90 days prior to an election.

(more…)

This is the little-known story behind the 2024 election. It will become a bigger story as the awakening continues.

This is the modification from the 2020 “mail in ballot” issue that perpetrated the original fraud.  Much like the shift in 2020, this is the subtle revision of operations that was planned in the background over the past few years when no one was paying attention.  This is also where I, long ago, put my focus, research and proactive actions to intercept.  Localized, fraudulent, ballot printing.

What we witness now in these emerging stories {Here} {Here} {Here} and {HERE} is an outcome of this activity.  This report below is yet another one; and yes, it’s almost everywhere.

HUERFANO COUNTY, Colo. (KRDO) – Multiple Colorado counties, including two in Southern Colorado, are experiencing issues with ballots not scanning.

KRDO13 has confirmed that ballots from a vendor called Fort Orange Press are unscannable. Las Animas and Huerfano Counties both used Fort Orange Press, as did Moffat County in the northwest corner of the state. The unscannable ballots were not issued to every voter in these counties.

(more…)

When you consider the probability that both govt and private sector are generating ballots, then you evaluate ballot centric issues accordingly.  County level ballots from two different feeder sources can present a problem at the scanning and tabulation stage, if there is any variance to them.  [Earlier Outline Evidence Here]

If the scanner is aligned to only one format of ballots, and more than one format are floating around (depending on county) then temporary malfunctions are likely.

If this is an accurate assessment of things, then what this video shows is exactly what we would expect.  WATCH:

BREAKING: In Nevada County, California, a large-scale issue with ballot printers has made it impossible for tabulators to count 77,000 ballots accurately

AGAIN. Why do we keep using these voting machines that malfunction at the slightest little “imperfection”?

I would like to… pic.twitter.com/eNLg0mTshb

— George (@BehizyTweets) October 29, 2024

.

(more…)

There is a lot of conflicting information about a recent 5th Circuit Court of Appeals (5th CCA) ruling that remands a lower court opinion back to the State of Mississippi.  You can read the 5th CCA RULING HERE.

The appellate judges stated that “Election Day,” as designated by Congress, is the last day ballots can be received by state officials. “Text, precedent, and historical practice confirm this ‘day for the election’ is the day by which ballots must be both cast by voters and received by state officials,” the court wrote, adding that Mississippi’s policy allowing ballots to arrive up to five days later is in conflict with federal law.

[Source pdf]

While the 5th CCA has jurisdiction over Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas, the decision only impacts Mississippi should the federal district court judge agree to bar the state from counting late-arriving mail-in ballots.  Yes, it is a win for Mississippi election integrity, but -no- it is unlikely to have a major impact on the overall election.

The ruling only applies to Mississippi, and the decision simply reverses the previous ruling and remands the issue back to the judge.  I hope that helps clear up any confusion.

(more…)

Many people might think that Attorney General Ken Paxton filing a letter of notice for criminal referral to the U.S Dept of Justice is an act of futility, because the DOJ is not going to investigate or indict criminal conduct by leftist political operatives.  However, there is a strategic process to follow, particularly if the Texas AG is likely to become the next U.S. Attorney General.

In a way this step-by-step proactive approach is exactly why my efforts to intercept fraudulent ballot printing operations in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania were targeted to the Postmasters General in specific locales.  It is unlawful to use the U.S.P.S. to conduct fraud through the postal system.  Additionally, it is specifically illegal for a postmaster to be provided with direct evidence of mail fraud, and to knowingly – with intent, allow further unlawful activity therein.

Texas AG Ken Paxton is following a procedural process that builds a legal pathway.

[SOURCE pdf]

TEXAS – Attorney General Ken Paxton made a criminal referral to the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) detailing the results of an investigation that revealed how suspicious actors seemingly use ActBlue’s political fundraising platform to make illegal straw donations.

(more…)

♦ Minnesota, South Dakota and Virginia began early voting on September 20. ♦ Vermont started tallying on September 21.  ♦ Illinois opened polling locations on September 26. ♦ California, Montana and Nebraska joined on October 7. ♦ Indiana, New Mexico, Ohio and Wyoming begin early voting on October 8, and ♦ Arizona on October 9.  ♦ Tennessee began October 16. ♦ North Carolina was the first battleground state to offer early voting, October 17.  ♦ Louisiana began today, October 18th.

[Interactive Map Link Here]

For residents in those states and others who have begun voting, let us begin our ground reporting on precinct level activity.

What is happening in your neighborhood, town, hamlet, village, county or city?  How are the polls in your area?

Ground reports have a record of accuracy.

(more…)

There is a lot going on behind the scenes in the final weeks.  Most political observers are now keenly aware of the difference between “ballots” and “votes” as they pertain to key counties:  Fulton County, Georgia; Wayne County, Michigan; Philadelphia and Allegany counties, Pennsylvania; Clark County, Nevada; Milwaukee and Marquette counties, Wisconsin, and Maricopa County, Arizona.

These are the specific counties and cities (Philadelphia, Atlanta, Milwaukee, Detroit) where the process of mass-mail/distribution of ballots, in combination with the assembly/harvesting therein, meets the process of “ballot scanning” at county level tabulation centers.  However, there’s another facet, “ballot making.”

Many people, including Robert F Kennedy Jr himself and his legal team in court filings, have presented the 2024 situation and asked a question. Essentially:

Why did the DNC apparatus sue to keep RFK JR’s name off certain state ballots and simultaneously sue to keep him on certain state ballots?

It just didn’t make sense….

… Until now.

(more…)

The Georgia state election rule is simple. Remove the paper ballots from the containers after voting and hand count the number of paper ballots. The number of paper ballots must match the number of electronically recorded votes and voters. If it does not there is a problem.  This rule also starts a paper trail putting the physical number of ballots on the record before they reach the Fulton County ballot scanning tabulation center.

It is a simple rule that says the number of ballots must match the number of voters. Easy peasy. The purpose of the rule is simple, make sure ballots are not double counted or scanned multiple times at the tabulation center. However, citing electoral anxiety, January 6th, and the lack of training poll workers on how to count numbers, a Fulton County judge has blocked the hand count. Apparently counting the number of physical papers is too difficult for Fulton County poll workers…. or, there is something else in play.

You can read the ridiculous judicial ruling HERE.

[SOURCE pdf]

You can read about Judge Robert McBurney HERE.  Let me be very clear without pretense…..  The Fulton County corrupt ballot system is dependent on scanning ballots multiple times.  This is what they did in 2020; this is why duplicate ballots were found in scanned ballot imaging and this is what they planned to do in 2024.  Run the Kamala Harris ballots multiple times to manufacture additional Harris votes.

Judge Robert McBurney is intentionally, with malicious intent, blocking the simple verification process that would have stopped the corrupt AME poll workers from scanning batches of ballots multiple times.  Judge Robert McBurney is facilitating the intent of ballot fraud. Fullstop.

(more…)