We’ve withheld presenting any consideration the Clinton/Lynch meeting in Arizona until AG Lynch presented her thoughts/explanations on the event.
SHE DID THAT TODAY.
As you can see in this interview (below) directly discussing the matter Attorney General Lynch goes to great lengths to walk through the parseltongue politispeak surrounding her meeting with Bill Clinton.
Pay attention to the phrases she is using.  Specifically note the frequency of:  “raises questions and concerns”, and “casts a shadow over how this case may be perceived”.  Those phrases alone make the ethical case for recusal.
However, against the call for her to recuse herself the next key phrase to focus on is:  “would mean that I wouldn’t even be briefed on what the findings were, or what the actions going forward would be.  And while I don’t have a role in those findings or making those recommendations on how to go forward, I will be briefed on it, and I will be accepting their recommendations.”

There it is. The real motive behind AG Lynch refusing to recuse herself (now that she was caught intentionally meeting with Bill Clinton) can be found in that explanation: (more…)

A public interest law professor from George Washinton University Law School, John F. Banzhaf III, has filed bar complaint (full pdf below) against Baltimore prosecutor Marilyn Mosby.
In the complaint Banzhaf calls Mosby a “runaway prosecutor” who has violated ethics rules governing the conduct of attorneys in Maryland at almost every turn in the case — from the moment she announced the charges against the officers in May 2015 to this week, when her office signaled it would continue pursuing its case against the officers still facing charges despite the full acquittal of two other officers in the last two months. (more…)

In March of 2012 there was a clear inflection point within the judicial system when leftists, professional grievance activists, switched tactics from proclaiming the innocence of the transparently guilty, to advocating for the guilt of the transparently innocent.
The political case constructs against George Zimmerman and Darren Wilson were two high-profile examples that soon followed…. now this:
This past weekend the Baltimore Sun outlined investigative evidence from a Baltimore detective, Dawnyell Taylor, that clearly shows the prosecution of the Baltimore Six police officers was yet another example.  Baltimore prosecutor Marilyn Mosby manufactured a political case intended to advocate for the guilt of the transparently innocent.
(Via Baltimore Sun) The lead Baltimore police detective in the Freddie Gray investigation said she reluctantly read to grand jurors a summary of evidence provided by prosecutors that she believed was misleading, according to police records reviewed by The Baltimore Sun. (more…)

WASHINGTON (AP) — An additional 165 pages of emails from Hillary Clinton’s time at the State Department surfaced Monday, including nearly three dozen that the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee failed to hand over last year that were sent through her private server.
[scribd id=316896963 key=key-GSEklVmWsVItRXVQVLmW mode=scroll]
(more…)

You won’t see this in the MSM headline news of the day’s events because it cuts directly against their preferred narrative.

The Supreme Court ruled 8-0 today to nullify the federal conviction of former Virginia Governor Bob McConnell on bribery and corruption charges (full ruling pdf below).  8 to 0, the entire court agreed, the conviction was politically motivated and not grounded in law.
Why?  Why did every justice agree, even the liberal justices? ….and they went one step further in ordering the lower courts to reconsider whether the government’s evidence of corruption is strong enough to even try him again.  If not, the charges against him must be dismissed, according to the ruling.

The why is really quite simple.  If you’ve ever heard James Carville or any Clinton spokesperson talk about the book “Clinton Cash“, you’ll see quickly what was at stake.
The case against Bob McDonnell was based on him accepting gifts while an elected public official.  Accepting gifts and/or donations itself is not illegal.  Does it look untoward, unsavory or tawdry, yes.  But if the official (recipient) takes no substantive action to benefit the contributor, meaning there is no quid-pro-quo, then no laws have been broken.
(more…)

Sharyl Attkisson writes a gobsmacking investigative article outlining how soldiers in Fort Bliss were running an active human smuggling ring bringing Mexican nationals across the border.  It looks like there’s a large number of active duty military engaged in this.  (make sure to read the entire article)…
(Via Sharyl Attkisson) U.S. authorities are investigating an illegal immigrant smuggling operation allegedly run by active duty military soldiers out of the Ft. Bliss U.S. Army post in El Paso, Texas. Ft. Bliss is headquarters for El Paso Intelligence Center (EPIC), a federal tactical operational intelligence center.
According to sources and documents, two U.S. soldiers, Marco Antonio Nava, Jr. and Joseph Cleveland, were arrested last Saturday by border patrol officers at Falfurias, Texas Border Patrol Station Checkpoint attempting to smuggle two Mexican citizens into the U.S. The Mexicans were riding in the back seat of the car.
Upon their arrest, the soldiers, who were not in uniform at the time, informed Border Patrol agents they are part of the 377 TC Company at Ft. Bliss.
(more…)

D.A.P.A or Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents program – is the executive action Obama attempted in November of 2014 which was shut down by Federal Judge Andrew Hanen in February ’15 with the issuance of an emergency injunction.

• The DOJ appealed the Hanen injunction, on merit, to the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals and lost.
• The DOJ then appealed the Hanen injunction, on standing, to the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, and lost again. (Full Backstory) <– Absolutely critical read to understand the scope of case – includes prior court rulings.
• The DOJ filed an appeal with the US Supreme Court.
• On January 19th, 2016 the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear the case.
• April 18th, 2016, the court heard oral arguments –full pdf transcript –
• Today the Supreme Court Ruling was announced –full pdf ruling–

Hanen Ruling Stands – Texas Wins – Obama Loses !

(more…)

According to MSNBC U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch can’t seem to figure out the motive of the Orlando terrorist, Omar Mateen.
Puzzled they are, stumped even. They just can’t quite figure it out.

(link)
(more…)

From the outset our research has pointed in the direction that Omar Mateen was committing an act of Jihad terrorism targeting a facility/venue he knew well, Pulse Nightclub.   Nothing about the event, or the preparatory behavior prior to the attack, held the appearance of a pure suicide mission.  The possibility of getting caught or killed obviously part of the process – but the preferred objective was to exit and escape.

Early on it simply appeared he intended to walk in, shoot and kill as many as possible, and then exit within less than a minute.  His plan was foiled by the off-duty security (fully uniformed police officer) who engaged Mateen and forced his way back into the nightclub.
As further evidence toward that end it is revealed Mateen pre-purchased three airline tickets for himself, his wife and his son the day prior to the shooting for use the day following the shooting.
(more…)

A few stunning aspects stick out from the carefully released partial and redacted transcript from the Orlando terrorist attack.  The manner of release affirms the earlier outlines and concerns surrounding AG Loretta Lynch and the Obama Administration:

• First – this release proves law enforcement, the FBI and the Obama administration knew the motive and intent was Islamic terrorism from the very first second contact was made.  When LEO stepped up to the first media press conference they knew it was an Islamic terrorist attack.
• Second – this release confirms allegiance with ISIS proclaimed in the specific manner that is required by the Islamic State in order to be given ideological and financial credit by ISIS.  [Which compounds the concern for why the Obama administration would release it].
• Third – the manipulation of the transcript by the Obama administration is sickening, replacing the word “Allah” with the word “God”.  As Pam Gellar states:  “Not only did Obama’s sharia compliant Department of Justice censor Islam and the Islamic State from Orlando jihadi Omar Mateen’s 911 call transcripts, they changed Allah to god as if we worship the same diety. And this was done in the name of every religion“.

(more…)