Scientific theory means a proposition you work to disprove, not reinforce…
Throughout the course of the past several years we have found it necessary to introduce new adjectives into the lexicon to describe situations and events. The FBI investigation into Huma Abedin’s (and by extension HRC’s) email and communication is no different.
A Black Hat: is a self-serving entity, person or organization, that is corrupt, deceitful, manipulative, exploitative, and working for their own power and interests. A bad entity.
A White Hat: is an altruistic entity, person or organization, that is foundationally grounded on truth, honesty, and clear definitions of right and moral wrong. A good entity.
Within your life, and within all organizations, you will encounter black hat operatives and white hat operatives. The structures of modern governmental institutions are no different. When black hats rise to the top of the institutional structure, the institution itself tends to become corrupt; or at the very least engaged in corrupt behavior.
In the free market, black hat operations eventually implode; they fall apart, it’s a natural consequence. Unfortunately, in governmental monopoly systems black hat operations can continue until the corruption becomes so overwhelming it eventually brings a white hat to the top.
In governmental systems when black hats rise to positions of power and influence the white hats are still there, just waiting – riding out the storm until another white hat takes the helm. Within this complex intra-system, intra-personal, dynamic, white hats are often conflicted; unable to stop black hat operations, or forced into a position of necessary willful blindness.
This sets the stage to understand what could be taking place with the reopening of the FBI investigation.
First, DO NOT FORGET – there is a separate and completely disconnected FBI investigation of the Clinton Foundation and Hillary Clinton’s activity while Secretary of State that has been ongoing for almost two years. That investigation has nothing to do with the email server investigation of “classified information”; that investigation has never ended.
Within the Clinton Email Server investigation you will note the two missing laptops that were used to download the emails after Combetta transferred them into a pst format. Those two laptops were used by Hillary Clinton attorneys to review and select the emails that were eventually turned over to the State Department. Those two laptops have been missing.
♦ Within the current story line of Anthony Weiner and Huma Abedin’s electronic devices, the MSM is selling a point of origin for the renewed FBI investigation as tens of thousands of Abedin (by extension Clinton) emails on a joint custody laptop of Weiner and Abedin.
On it’s face, this MSM narrative is ridiculous. Huma and Anthony were a modern couple with high-level electronic interface needed for both of their professional responsibilities. There is simply no plausible basis to believe they ever shared a laptop. Each of them, as a necessary condition of their activity, had their own devices. Period.
Abedin and Weiner were not a typical familial/employment middle-class couple, in the traditional sense of the word. Their life’s network of engagement required them to be connected to their individual endeavors. There is no reasonable assertion they would be sharing a laptop computer. Period.
That said, they were/are separated.
The most likely scenario is that when the New York investigative search warrant/ subpoena was issued to take custody of all Weiner’s electronic devices (part of the pedophile ‘sexting’ investigation), all electronic devices within their home would be captured – and as a consequence reviewed.
Occams Razor = The laptop in question, found to be containing all of the tens-of-thousands of emails, was a Huma Abedin laptop – picked up as part of the electronic device capture.
Obviously, this would not have been the currently used Abedin laptop, unless she was still living with Weiner at the time of investigative disposition, and happened to be in the residence at the time the subpoena/warrant was executed. More than likely, the laptop in question was one remaining in the residence absent of Abedin’s physical presence.
Yes, given the nature of their profession, and the extensive use of electronic devices, it would not be odd to find multiple laptops within such a household.
Which begs the question, was the laptop in question one of the missing laptops from the Clinton email investigation? One can easily imagine a scenario where this could be the case…. One can also easily imagine a scenario where the content therein would be kept by Abedin for a reason; especially by a person who knows EVERYTHING about the extent the severe black hat Clinton’s are willing to go to retain their power.
[*Note* The other close circle affiliate who might also want to hold on to such information/insurance, would be Cheryl Mills.]
Under this scenario -most likely- a white hat operative (probably within the local NYC LEO investigative community) would have been the entity who secured all the electronic devices and discovered the Abedin issue.
That information would necessarily have to be given to the FBI (white hat behavior protocol) even if the white hat held knowledge, or fear, they were giving it to a black hat recipient. And/Or… the white hat knew that eventually the information, as an outcome of its nature, would find its way into the upper branches of a black hat institution.
Notice all the reports of who, how, when, etc. surrounding this Abedin/Clinton email controversy/story, are coming from *leaks* from “officials” according to media stories as they come out.
Notice none of these who, what, how, when reports are coming from on-the-record FBI officials.
The way the information is coming out in the media casts the appearance of white hats forcing the hand of black hats. There is no doubt that U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch is operating comfortably as a black hat wearer, within a black hat operation.
However, the more interesting question is: Is FBI Director James Comey a White Hat or a Black Hat?
To us, it is simply too soon to tell.