Those who walk the deep weeds of politics immediately recognized that Ann Selzer had cashed-out and was going to retire after she transmitted the ridiculous polling that showed Kamala Harris was going to win Iowa by +3 points.  The prediction was laughable, and the result showcased just how silly it was, Trump +13.

The reality was that Selzer, and the ideologues around her, posted the bogus weekend election poll in order to fuel an attempted “pro-abortion” narrative and boost female turnout in the November 5th election.  The Sunday talks and corporate media ran with the narrative from the baseline of Selzer’s fraud.

Today Ann Selzer announces her retirement, “in order to pursue other ventures and opportunities.”

IOWA – Public opinion polling has been my life’s work. I collected my first research data as a freshman in college, if you don’t count a neighborhood poll I did at age 5. I’ve always been fascinated with what a person could learn from a scientific sample of a meaningful universe.

Beyond election polls, my favorite projects were helping clients learn something they did not know to help them evaluate options for their companies, institutions or causes. That work may well continue, but I knew a few years ago that the election polling part of my career was headed to a close.

[…] My integrity means a lot to me. To those who have questioned it, there are likely no words to dissuade. For those who know me best, I appreciate the supportive notes and calls reminding me that what drew me to them as friends, colleagues and clients was commitment to truth and accuracy — both in my professional and my personal relationships. (read more)

(more…)

Do you notice the absence of all the things that were proclaimed as destined to happen by the Moonbats?

No riots, no mayhem, no burning crisis and mass protests; essentially quiet.

What we discover during this phase is that an unstable leftist population of 0.1% is not being stirred up by the Intelligence Community and the ideological leftist media who support them.  Both the IC and their media are frozen.

There is that phase in every abusive relationship when the abuser has run out of manipulation that works. They realize their victims are numb to their efforts; things get quiet.

Worse still for Democrats, the grassroots believers are in full retreat because they are realizing they were gaslit into believing Kamala would win.  The leftist influencers are losing their army of foot soldiers who believed them in mass.  The dawn of the Great Awakening is upon us.

(more…)

A few articles for the historic record are in order.  First, this one about the Kamala Harris campaign team taking all of the Biden campaign money, then fundraising for another $1 billion, with a “B”, and now facing $20 million in unpaid debts.

We all know the Harris campaign consisted of over-the-top manipulation to give the illusion of support.  However, the scale of how much money it took to generate that false impression is only just now starting to surface.

As the details surface, Senior Harris advisor and former Campaign Manager for Barack Obama, David Plouffe, now deletes his Twitter account and attempts to hide.

It appears that many of the “Hollywood” actors and music industry “Talent,” as well as their concerts therein, were paid big money for those promotions.  Matthew Boyle is starting to reveal the scale:

Boyle: “Ok so this just got very explosive. A Kamala campaign staffer who saw these posts called me just now and said there is a massive scandal here worthy of an audit.

The $20 million debt thing is real. Rob Flaherty, this staffer said, is currently shopping around the Kamala fundraising email list to anyone who wants it to try to raise the money back. This includes other campaigns and outside groups.

(more…)

Check out (video at :50) who was at the White House today for Joe Biden’s post-election speech, John Podesta. Interesting.

While Biden was effusive in his praise for Kamala Harris’ campaign. It seemed like his comments were more passive aggressive snark than genuine compliments. Maybe there is something to the rumors of Biden Inc disliking immensely the Obama/Harris camp.  Video Below:

.

Screengrab of Podesta in the audience below.

(more…)

Currently leading by 5 points in both Nevada and Arizona, President Donald Trump is on pace to win every battleground state in the 2024 election.

The states of Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Michigan, previously labeled the “blue wall,” have been called for President Trump.  These three states are where James Clyburn spent most of his time on the ballot initiatives.  However, most of the critical regional ¹ballot printing operations were defeated.

Last night, President Trump secured Georgia and North Carolina.  President Trump is on pace to have shattered every battleground state result and achieve 312 electoral votes.  A resounding victory.

[Interactive Map Here]

(Via Politico) – Donald Trump won Michigan, once again turning the state red just four years after his defeat in 2020.

Both candidates spent a number of their final days in the Great Lakes State as polls projected a race hanging on a knife’s edge. Both Trump and Kamala Harris emphasized manufacturing and the economy in their visits, addressing voters’ worries about lingering post-pandemic inflation — a chief concern that bolstered the former president’s appeal.

(more…)

There is a video segment going viral from CNN that deserves some special attention. Within the video CNN’s Jake Tapper asks CNN election guru John King to show where Kamala is doing better than Joe Biden. The result catches Tapper by surprise.

However, there’s a big underpinning reality behind this.

Kamala Harris did not “underperform” Joe Biden, what the data actually shows is the missing fraudulent ballots from the 2020 election. WATCH:

All of the counties where Kamala did better than Joe Biden pic.twitter.com/nd4d4kXQ4B

— Anthony (@Catholicizm1) November 6, 2024

.

Now that we know the basic 2024 raw vote total, we are able to put a scale on the number of fraudulent mail-in ballots from the 2020 election.

Based on 2024 vote/ballot data, 18 million ballots are missing when compared to 2020.

In 2024 there are 18 million fewer votes. That’s the approximate scale of ballot fraud from 2020. (see graphic below)

(more…)

This is not a “one-off” I tried myself using Google.com and the search result is indeed being manipulated.

When the user uses Google to search for: “where can I vote for Trump” -vs- “where can I vote for Harris” the Google result is entirely different.

When searching the Harris option, the Google search algorithm tells you exactly where you can vote.  When using the Trump option, the result is generic.

This is blatant big tech manipulation by an ideological ally of Democrats. However, it should not come as a surprise.

Below is the reminder of what Google executives promised they would do to manipulate future elections after the 2016 result.

(more…)

On January 17, 2017, just three days before President-Trump was sworn into office, outgoing President Obama had a secret conference call with progressive media allies.

A long battled FOIA request by Jason Leopold was finally able to receive documents and within the documents the transcript of the phone call is revealed. [Documents Here]

Again, this is three days before Trump took office, when the Obama White House and Intelligence Community were intentionally pushing the Trump-Russia conspiracy story into the media in an effort to disrupt President Trump’s transition to power.  President Obama is essentially asking his progressive allies to help defend his administration. Part of the 20-page transcript is below: 

Barack Obama – […] “I think the Russia thing is a problem. And it’s of a piece with this broader lack of transparency. It is hard to know what conversations the President-elect may be having offline with business leaders in other countries who are also connected to leaders of other countries. And I’m not saying there’s anything I know for a fact or can prove, but it does mean that — here’s the one thing you guys have been able to know unequivocally during the last eight years, and that is that whether you disagree with me on policy or not, there was never a time in which my relationship with a foreign entity might shade how I viewed an issue. And that’s — I don’t know a precedent for that exactly.

Now, the good news there, I will say, is just that there’s a lot of career folks here who care about that stuff, and not just in the intelligence agencies. I think in our military, in our State Department. And I think that to the extent that things start getting weird, I think you will see surfacing objections, some through whistleblowers and some through others. And so I think there is some policing mechanism there, but that’s unprecedented.

And then the final thing that I’m most worried about is just preserving the democratic process so that in two years, four years, six years, if people are dissatisfied, that dissatisfaction expresses itself. So Jeff Sessions and the Justice Department and what’s happening with the voting rights division and the civil rights division, and — those basic process issues that allow for the democratic process to work. I’d include in that, by the way, press. I think you guys are all on top of how disconcerting — you guys complain about us — (laughter) — but let me just tell you, I think — we actually respected you guys and cared about trying to explain ourselves to you in a way that I think is just going to be different.

On balance, that leads to me to say I think that four years is okay. Take on some water, but we can kind of bail fast enough to be okay. Eight years would be a problem. I would be concerned about a sustained period in which some of these norms have broken down and started to corrode.

Q Could you talk a bit more about the Russia thing? Because it sounds like you, who knows more than we do from what you’ve seen, and is genuinely —

(more…)

Despite Donald Trump’s campaign managers in 2016 and 2024 being women, and despite many of the top executives in the Trump organization being women, and despite most of the spokespeople for President Trump being women, Kamala Harris campaign surrogate Mark Cuban said yesterday, “you never see him around strong, intelligent women. Ever. It’s just that simple. They’re intimidating to him. He doesn’t like to be challenged by them.”

This set off a firestorm of pushback against the insufferable sexist Mark Cuban, a billionaire who spews hatred and vitriolic nonsense on an almost daily basis.  “More of the same condescending rhetoric from Harris allies,” said Sen. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa. “This strong, intelligent woman voted for Donald J. Trump — and I’ve been proud to be on the road across this great country with @TeamTrump!”

“Trying to think of a response to sissy man @mcuban but I’m too dumb and weak to do so,” quipped conservative columnist Julie Kelly. “Just when you think the Kamala camp can’t possibly alienate and divide people any more than they already have, now they attack women who support Trump. Nice job, Mark,” added Republican National Committee co-chair Lara Trump. Wyoming congressional representative Harriet Hageman had this video response:

I am traveling across Wyoming but had to pull over to respond to Mark Cuban’s weak and unintelligent remarks about women who support Trump. pic.twitter.com/xVmU2ha4BX

— Harriet Hageman (@HagemanforWY) October 31, 2024

.

(more…)

I’m going to skip most of the nonsense about the “Raskin Letter” [SEE HERE] to focus on the part that few will notice or report.

The process that Jamie Raskin is angry about, is a transition process that was created by Barack Obama and his GSA administrative state allies, to control all aspects of an incoming administration in opposition to the system that Obama created.  This was the reinforcement cement in the “fundamental change” pillar.

The “transition process” that Raskin talks about was created in 2010.  The only presidential transitions that have taken place since then were Trump in ’16 and Biden in ’20.  That’s it.  This is not a historically used process.  In fact, Barack Obama never used it in 2009 when he came into office, because it never existed.

President Trump’s planned 2025 transition team are simply refusing to repeat the mistakes of the 2017 transition process that ended up with the GSA willfully impeding the peaceful transition of power, by targeting the incoming administration.  Lastly, notice the pesky IC term in the 3rd paragraph, “continuity” – as in the continuity of leftist government.

[SOURCE pdf]

(Via NBC) – The top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, Rep. Jamie Raskin, is sounding the alarm over former President Donald Trump’s failure to enter into key agreements with the Biden administration for the presidential transition process, warning that it could endanger the peaceful transfer of power and threaten U.S. national security.

(more…)