The technocrats of modern globalism have a way of carrying inappropriate gleefulness as they laugh, smile and pontificate their detachment from life under their control.

Thus the ever present smirk, smile and laughter from Bill Gates as he describes how workers on Main Street USA must accept their economic destruction as part of their larger responsibility to the global community.  Don’t forget to wash your hands as you plate the Golden Sushi containing edible gold-leaf and precious pearls.  Smiles everyone, smiles.

(more…)

Appearing with Maria Bartiromo, former national security advisor, Lt General Michael Flynn, states: “we have conclusive evidence of foreign interference in our election.”  Mr. Flynn goes on to say his attorney, Sidney Powell, has four cases en route to the United States Supreme Court to highlight the “overwhelming evidence” of election fraud.

Additionally, General Flynn states it would serve the best interests of the United States if President Trump would trigger his 2018 executive order on foreign election interference to appoint a federal special counsel – to look into all of the background claims of fraud on behalf of the executive branch of government.  A very interesting interview.  WATCH:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=glcLnQFbk7A

.

DefendingTheRepublic.Org

(more…)

Appearing with Fox News Maria Bartiromo, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton outlines his state’s legal and constitutional position on election fraud that disenfranchises his citizens.   If Texas has no “standing” then how are we to remain The United States.

As Paxton rightly notes if electoral nullification is not in the constitutional purview of the Supreme Court then what is?  The electors clause is in the Constitution for a reason… and the Tree of Liberty is quite parched at this specific moment in history.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vDPfQFuzd98

It might, very small ‘might‘, be argued the constitutional “harm” has not yet evidenced as electors have not yet presented themselves. However, the SCOTUS ruling would likely have inferred that position.

Texas AG Paxton does not appear to be positioned to re-file after 12/14/20.

(more…)

The Rebel Alliance is an international rag-tag team of liberty-minded patriots who are fighting the infiltration of weaponized corporate and political power against the core tenets of human freedom….

Today, a very consequential leak of almost two million Chinese Communist Party (CCP) members was released. Each of the people on the list are embedded within a network of multinational corporations and institutions around the globe. The CCP members are in senior ranks at all of the major multinational organizations with access to intellectual property, information technology and security. The multinationals are intentionally allowing CCP infiltration; none of this is happening by mistake.

The massive data-file [Download Here w/ Caution] was offered to all major international journalists and media organizations. All of the major U.S. media outlets did not want the data. As a consequence, media outlets within Australia and the U.K. are leading the release.

NOTE: At the same time U.S. media were refusing the leaked information they were simultaneously criticizing a U.S. executive order blocking CCP members from visas’ longer than one month in duration, by claiming no-one had any way to know who was a CCP member. In essence, the U.S. corporate media did not want to know.

U.S. politicians, U.S. journalists and U.S. corporate media outlets -together with Big Tech- are facilitating the agenda of the Red Dragon through their willful blindness to the CCP infiltration. The motive for U.S. media disinterest is based on financial entanglements with the CCP and their own participation in support of the ideology of globalism – which the CCP is exploiting in order to advance their totalitarian interests.

(more…)

A video has been produced to ask a few very basic questions.  As the tabulations of vote counting is automatically updated to central databases for distribution to media, how do vote counts turn negative?  Errors can be made, but why are all the ‘errors’ going in only one direction.  Vote tabulations should be additive, why are vote totals decreasing?

(more…)

In another exhibition of COVID madness, the governor of New York has banned indoor eating in New York City to stem the spread of the virus.  However, the state’s own data shows a mere 1.4 percent of COVID-19 cases can be traced to restaurants.

It seems absolutely ridiculous when you think about proximity endeavors.  Consider that airplanes, buses and trains have no social distancing at all – while restaurants were only allowed to operate at 25 percent capacity.  Now restaurants can have no indoor service.

[New York Post] … In Manhattan, the capital of America’s restaurant business with more places, seats and customers than anywhere else, the new-infection rate is a mere 2.5 percent, compared with 5 percent in the state overall.

Yet absurdly, indoor dining is still allowed in most of the state including in areas with much higher infection rates.

The indoor ban’s the most painful to restaurant workers and to owners who went beyond the last mile to comply with the ever-changing rules for indoor and outdoor dining. (more)

(more…)

Together with his family Lt. General Michael Flynn delivers remarks during the Jericho March in Washington DC today.

(more…)

Many people recognize there was an underlying organizational network operating within the key regions in the 2020 election, but few people have outlined the specific network and how it operates.  In this video Phil Kline, former Attorney General of Kansas and current director of the Amistad Project, testifies to Wisconsin State Legislature about the corrupt and unequal influence of Facebook and CEO Mark Zuckerberg in the 2020 election.

Zuckerberg contributed $350 million to the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL), a left leaning organization that has been providing these funds to towns, cities, and counties for election administration, via contributions to their general funds.   WATCH:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WP9bNYv5uns&feature=emb_logo

(more…)

In a disappointing majority decision announced shortly before 6:30pm Friday evening, a majority of Supreme Court justices refused to take up a Texas lawsuit challenging four states in the 2020 election.

The court, with two dissenting options by Justice Alito and Justice Thomas, stated that Texas lacked a legal right to sue and did not have a legal interest in how other states carried out their elections.

The court rejected the Texas’ lawsuit without considering the specific merits of the state’s case.

Texas had asked the court to delay the official vote of the Electoral College, scheduled for Monday, Dec. 14, or prevent the four states from casting votes in the Electoral College for Biden. Justice Alito filed a short statement regarding the court’s disposition of the case and was joined by Justice Clarence Thomas.

The position of the Supreme Court raises an important question that now sits unresolved. If an individual citizen is determined not to have standing to challenge an election result; and if a group of citizens represented by their interest in a state, any state, is also denied standing to challenge an election result; then who can constitutionally challenge an election, any election, that is mired in controversy and demonstrable evidence of fraud?

From the Alliance:

(more…)

There are only a few instances where a party can file a direct lawsuit with the U.S. Supreme Court, a state claiming harm by another state is one of those instances.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has filed a lawsuit [pdf here] with the supreme court seeking and emergency injunction against Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Georgia “from taking action to certify presidential electors or to have such electors take any official action including without limitation participating in the electoral college.”

The Texas AG argues that arbitrary changes made by the state’s governors, secretaries of states and election supervisors were “inconsistent with relevant state laws and were made by non-legislative entities, without any consent by the state legislatures. The acts of these officials thus directly violated the Constitution.”

The lawsuit states: “these non-legislative changes … facilitated the casting and counting of ballots in violation of state law, which, in turn, violated the Electors Clause of Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution.” […] “By these unlawful acts, the Defendant States have not only tainted the integrity of their own citizens vote, but their actions have also debased the votes of citizens in Plaintiff State and other States that remained loyal to the Constitution.”

(more…)