With an announcement of his departure from prison, many people are excited about the possibility of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange revealing information about the Obama/Biden surveillance state. I would urge everyone to temper those sentiments.
The Biden DOJ is a malicious leftist political targeting machine, with only one intention carried out with the Lawfare that underpins their mission. Main Justice, and especially the DOJ National Security Division within the DOJ, is the center of all corrupt justice operations.
There is absolutely no deal between the DOJ-NSD and Julian Assange that could be against the interests of Joe Biden or his administration. Do not pretend such a construct is even possible. Assange is released ONLY because the terms mean he is not a threat to Biden.
Julian Assange is on his way to U.S. District Court in the Northern Mariana Islands, a U.S. territory in the south Pacific about 2,000 miles north of Australia, where he will plead guilty to one felony count: “conspiring to disseminate classified information.”
[SOURCE]
Wikileaks announced the Assange release with the following message:
Julian Assange is free. He left Belmarsh maximum security prison on the morning of 24 June, after having spent 1901 days there. He was granted bail by the High Court in London and was released at Stansted airport during the afternoon, where he boarded a plane and departed the UK.
This is the result of a global campaign that spanned grass-roots organisers, press freedom campaigners, legislators and leaders from across the political spectrum, all the way to the United Nations. This created the space for a long period of negotiations with the US Department of Justice, leading to a deal that has not yet been formally finalised. We will provide more information as soon as possible.
After more than five years in a 2×3 metre cell, isolated 23 hours a day, he will soon reunite with his wife Stella Assange, and their children, who have only known their father from behind bars.
WikiLeaks published groundbreaking stories of government corruption and human rights abuses, holding the powerful accountable for their actions. As editor-in-chief, Julian paid severely for these principles, and for the people’s right to know.
As he returns to Australia, we thank all who stood by us, fought for us, and remained utterly committed in the fight for his freedom.
Julian’s freedom is our freedom.
[Source]
The Wikileaks X Account is tracking his travels – SEE HERE
WASHINGTON DC – […] Under the pact detailed in court filings made public Monday evening, he would be sentenced to just over five years in prison — but would be entitled to immediate release because that’s roughly how long he’s been jailed in England while fighting extradition to the U.S.
The case has been a diplomatic headache for the Biden administration, which has faced pressure from Australia, a key national-security ally, to end Assange’s years in legal limbo.
Adding another exotic twist to an already byzantine tale, Assange’s guilty plea to a single Espionage Act charge is set to take place Wednesday morning in U.S. District Court in the Northern Mariana Islands — a U.S. territory in the south Pacific about 2,000 miles north of Australia.
The unusual venue reflects Assange’s unwillingness to return voluntarily to the continental U.S., according to a letter Justice Department prosecutors posted on a court docket. The radical transparency activist harbors a deep distrust of the U.S. government. He and his allies have accused U.S. officials of plotting to have him killed with a drone. (read more)
.
[NOTE – QUALIFIER: There’s obviously a lot of what I have always called “Assange-level European Wikileaks dramatic flair” around the events of his release, which can create eyerolls for those of us who have watched the decade-plus details unfold. Wikileaks is always the wounded indian in the rage-against-the-regime routine. They don’t do themselves any favors by banging a drumbeat with the same tones as World War Reddit.]
Back to reality….
While Julian Assange and Wikileaks could clarify a decade of guessing and assumption about details within their organizational work, I doubt they will. Keep in mind, progressive/leftism is now the opposite of what it was before Assange sought legal safety in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London.
When Julian Assange went into confinement the leftists were a party that pretended they were opposed to war and totalitarian regimes. As Assange exits the Old Bailey prison, the leftists now love the DOJ, FBI, IC, CIA and totalitarian world security forces killing, bombing and incarcerating their political opposition. Thus his exit agreement should be filtered accordingly.
It would not surprise me to see Assange creating videos where he demands the arrest of horrible Donald Trump, while pitching the opportunity to attend lavish Wikileaks fundraising dinners with honorees AOC, Christopher Steele and Andrew Weissmann. Prepare your mindset accordingly.
After all, if you really think about it, Julian Assange has left a small prison in England for a larger cell in Australia.
A WALK IN THE VERY DEEP WEEDS….
The Weissmann/Mueller report contains claims that Russia hacked the DNC servers as the central element to the Russia interference narrative in the U.S. election. This DNC hacking claim is the fulcrum issue structurally underpinning the Russian election interference narrative pushed by the Weissmann and Muller Special Counsel. However, this essential claim was directly disputed by WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, as outlined during a Dana Rohrabacher interview and by Julian Assange’s own on-the-record statements.
Julian Assange was forcibly removed and arrested in 2019 at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London immediately after the Weissmann/Muller report was released to Bill Barr.
Despite investigating the background of the Trump-Russia nonsense, John Durham never touched the DNC hacking claim – the core of the Mueller report.
Why?
Because Durham knew the U.S. Government threw a bag over Assange to protect the fraudulent Trump-Russia and Russian interference claims.
Again, this reality speaks to the corruption within the motive behind the John Durham investigation.
Durham was protecting Weissmann, Mueller and the core of their justification for a 2-year investigation. Durham knew why Assange was arrested. Durham stayed away from it, intentionally.
The Russians HAD TO have made efforts to interfere in the 2016 election, or else the factual basis for the FBI/IC surveillance operation against presidential candidate Donald Trump would be naked to the world.
That reality is why so much DOJ, FBI and Mueller special counsel energy was exhausted framing the false predicate.
“Seventeen intelligence agencies,” the December 29th Joint Analysis Report (JAR), the expulsion of the Russian diplomats which was an outcropping of the JAR, the rushed January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment, shoving microphones in everyone’s faces and demanding they answer if they believed Russia interfered – all of it, and I do mean every bit of it, is predicated on an absolute DC need to establish that Russia Attempted to Interfere in the 2016 election.
The “Russian Malicious Cyber Activity – Joint Analysis Report” (full pdf) is pure nonsense. It outlines nothing more than vague and disingenuous typical hacking activity that is no more substantive than any other hacking report on any other foreign actor. However, it was needed to help frame the Russian interference narrative.
There were no Russian diplomats involved; there was no Russian election interference; there was no Russian hacking of the DNC; it was all a fraud created by the intelligence community (IC), FBI and Main Justice to support Hillary Clinton’s lies and then cover their own targeting tracks.
Remember, on September 26, 2021, Yahoo News published an extensive article about the CIA targeting WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange in 2017 and the extreme conversations that were taking place at the highest levels of the U.S. government about how to control him.
There is a much bigger story transparently obvious when overlapped with CTH research files on the Mueller investigation and the U.S. intelligence community. Specifically, the motive intentionally not outlined by Yahoo News.
What I am going to share yet again, is a deep dive using the resources and timeline from within that Yahoo article and then specific details we have assembled that paint a clear picture about what interests existed for the Deep State, the Intelligence apparatus and the Mueller-Weissmann special counsel.
Continuing to read this fully cited review is not for the faint of heart. This is a Deep State journey that could shock many; it could alarm more and will likely force more than a few to reevaluate just what the purpose was for Mike Pompeo within the Donald Trump administration.
As the Yahoo News article begins, they outline how those within the Trump administration viewed Assange as a risk in 2017.
Here it is critical to accept that many people inside the Trump administration were there to control events, not to facilitate a policy agenda from a political outsider. In the example of Assange, the information he carried was a risk to those who attempted and failed to stop Trump from winning the 2016 election.
Julian Assange was not a threat to Donald Trump, but he was a threat to those who attempted to stop Donald Trump. In 2017, the DC system was reacting to a presidency they did not control. As an outcome, the Office of the President was being managed and influenced by some with ulterior motives.
Yahoo, via Michael Isikoff, puts it this way: “Some senior officials inside the CIA and the Trump administration even discussed killing Assange, going so far as to request “sketches” or “options” for how to assassinate him. Discussions over kidnapping or killing Assange occurred “at the highest levels” of the Trump administration, said a former senior counterintelligence official. “There seemed to be no boundaries.”
As we overlay the timeline, it is prudent to pause and remember some hindsight details. According to reports in November of 2019, U.S. Attorney John Durham and U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr were spending time looking carefully at CIA activity in the 2016 presidential election. One quote from a media-voice increasingly sympathetic to a political deep-state noted:
“One British official with knowledge of Barr’s wish list presented to London commented that, “It is like nothing we have come across before, they are basically asking, in quite robust terms, for help in doing a hatchet job on their own intelligence services”“. (Link)
It is interesting that quote came from a British intelligence official, as there was extensive pre-2016 election evidence of an FBI/CIA counterintelligence operation that also involved U.K. intelligence services. There was an aspect to the FBI/CIA operation that overlaps with both a U.S. and U.K. need to keep Wikileaks founder Julian Assange under tight control.
To understand the risk that Julian Assange represented to FBI/CIA interests, and effectively the Mueller special counsel, it is important to understand just how extensive the operations of the FBI/CIA were in 2016. It is within this network of foreign and domestic operations where FBI Agent Peter Strzok was clearly working as a bridge between the CIA and FBI operations.
By now, people are familiar with the construct of CIA operations involving Joseph Mifsud, a Maltese professor generally identified as a western intelligence operative who was tasked by the FBI/CIA to run an operation against Trump campaign official George Papadopoulos in both Italy (Rome) and London. {Go Deep} John Durham ignored him.
In a similar fashion, the FBI tasked U.S. intelligence asset Stefan Halper to target another Trump campaign official, Carter Page. Under the auspices of being a Cambridge Professor, Stefan Halper also targeted General Michael Flynn. Additionally, using assistance from a female FBI agent, under the false name Azra Turk, Halper also targeted Papadopoulos. Again, John Durham ignored it.
The initial operations to target Flynn, Papadopoulos and Page were all based overseas. This seemingly makes the CIA exploitation of the assets and the targets legal and much easier. If Durham went into this intelligence rabbit hole, there would be a paper trail that leads back to Robert Mueller. Durham didn’t go there.
John Durham and IG Michael Horowitz both outlined how very specific exculpatory evidence was known to the FBI and Main Justice, yet that evidence was withheld from the FISA application used against Carter Page and/or it was ignored. The FBI fabricated information in the FISA and removed evidence that Carter Page was previously working for the CIA. This is what FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith was indicted and convicted for doing.
One week after the FBI and DOJ filed the second renewal for the Carter Page FISA [April 7, 2017], Yahoo News notes how Mike Pompeo delivered his first remarks as CIA Director:
[…] On April 13, 2017, wearing a U.S. flag pin on the left lapel of his dark gray suit, Pompeo strode to the podium at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), a Washington think tank, to deliver to a standing-room-only crowd his first public remarks as Trump’s CIA director.
Rather than use the platform to give an overview of global challenges or to lay out any bureaucratic changes he was planning to make at the agency, Pompeo devoted much of his speech to the threat posed by WikiLeaks. (link)
Why would CIA Director Mike Pompeo be so concerned about Julian Assange and Wikileaks in April 2017?
In April of 2017 Pompeo’s boss, President Donald Trump, was under assault from the intelligence community writ large, and every deep state actor was leaking to the media in a frenzied effort to continue the Trump-Russia collusion conspiracy.
The Trump-Russia effort was so all consuming that FBI Director James Comey was even keeping a diary of engagement with President Trump in order to support an ongoing investigation built on fraud – yet, Mike Pompeo is worried about Julian Assange.
Again, here it is important to put yourself back into the time of reference. Remember, it’s clear in the text messages between FBI Agent Strzok and Lisa Page that Peter Strzok had a working relationship with what he called their “sister agency”, the CIA.
♦ Former CIA Director John Brennan admitted Peter Strzok helped write the January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) which outlines the Russia narrative; and it was also Peter Strzok who authored the July 31st, 2016, “Electronic Communication” from the CIA to the FBI that originated FBI operation “Crossfire Hurricane.” Strzok immediately used that EC to travel to London to debrief intelligence officials around Australian Ambassador to the U.K. Alexander Downer.
In short, Peter Strzok was a profoundly overzealous James Bond wannabe who acted as a bridge between the CIA and the FBI. The perfect type of FBI career agent for 2016’s CIA Director John Brennan to utilize.
Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson hired CIA Open-Source analyst Nellie Ohr toward the end of 2015, at appropriately the same time as “FBI Contractors” were identified exploiting the NSA database and extracting information on a specific set of U.S. persons. One, if not the primary extractors, has now been identified as Rodney Joffe at Neustar. “The campaign plot was outlined by Durham in a 27-page indictment charging former Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann with making a false report to the FBI. The plot was also outlined in the finished Durham report. Eight individuals who allegedly conspired with Sussmann but does not identify them by name. The sources familiar with the probe confirmed that the leader of the team of contractors was Rodney L. Joffe.” {Go Deep}
It was also Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson who was domestically tasked with a Russian lobbyist named Natalia Veselnitskaya. A little reported Russian Deputy Attorney General named Saak Albertovich Karapetyan was working as a double agent for the CIA and Kremlin. Karapetyan was directing the foreign operations of Natalia Veselnitskaya, and Glenn Simpson was organizing her inside the U.S as part of his Trump-Russia creation.
Glenn Simpson managed Veselnitskaya through the 2016 Trump Tower meeting with Donald Trump Jr. However, once the CIA/Fusion GPS operation using Veselnitskaya started to unravel with public reporting, back in Russia Deputy AG Karapetyan died in a helicopter crash.
Simultaneously timed in late 2015 through mid 2016, there was a domestic FBI operation using a young Russian named Maria Butina tasked to run up against Republican presidential candidates. According to Patrick Byrne, Butina’s handler, was FBI agent Peter Strzok who was giving Byrne the instructions on where to send her. {Go Deep}
All of this context outlines the extent to which the FBI/CIA was openly involved in constructing a political operation that settled upon anyone in candidate Donald Trump’s orbit. A large international operation directed by the FBI/CIA and domestic operations seemingly directed by Peter Strzok operating with a foot in both agencies. [Strzok gets CIA service coin] Durham eviscerated the predicate for all of this in his report, yet stayed away from the part that leads to Robert Mueller in 2017.
Recap: ♦Mifsud tasked against Papadopoulos (CIA). ♦Halper tasked against Flynn (CIA), Page (CIA) and Papadopoulos (CIA). ♦Azra Turk, pretending to be Halper asst, tasked against Papadopoulos (FBI). ♦Veselnitskaya tasked against Donald Trump Jr. (CIA, Fusion GPS). ♦Butina tasked against Trump and Donald Trump Jr (FBI).
Additionally, Christopher Steele was a British intelligence officer hired by Fusion GPS to assemble and launder fraudulent intelligence information within his dossier. And we cannot forget Oleg Deripaska, a Russian oligarch, who was recruited by Asst. FBI Director Andrew McCabe to participate in running an operation against the Trump campaign and create the impression of Russian involvement. Deripaska refused to participate.
All of this engagement directly controlled by U.S. intelligence, and all of this intended to give a specific Russia impression. This predicate was what John Durham was reviewing in November of 2019, and then released in his final report – while whitewashing the parts that led to the Mueller silo.
The key point of all that contextual background is to see how committed the CIA and FBI were to the constructed narrative of Russia interfering with the 2016 election. The CIA, FBI, and by extension the DOJ and a multitude of political operatives, put a hell of a lot of work into it.
We know John Durham looked at the construct of the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA); and talking to CIA analysts who participated in the construct of the January 2017 report that bolstered the false appearance of Russian interference in the 2016 election. This context is important, because it ties in to the next part that involves Julian Assange and Wikileaks. This is where the motives of Mike Pompeo in mid/late 2017 come into play.
[…] By the summer of 2017, the CIA’s proposals were setting off alarm bells at the National Security Council. “WikiLeaks was a complete obsession of Pompeo’s,” said a former Trump administration national security official. (link)
On April 11th, 2019, the Julian Assange indictment was unsealed in the Eastern District of Virginia (EDVA). From the indictment we discover it was under seal since March 6th, 2018:
On Tuesday April 15, 2019, more investigative material was released. Again, note the dates: Grand Jury, *December of 2017* This means FBI investigation prior to….
The FBI investigation took place prior to December 2017, it was coordinated through the Eastern District of Virginia (EDVA) where Dana Boente was U.S. Attorney at the time. The grand jury indictment was sealed from March of 2018 until after Mueller completed his investigation, April 2019.
Why the delay?
What exactly was the DOJ waiting for from March 2018 to April 2019?
This timeframe is the peak of the Robert Mueller/Andrew Weissmann special counsel investigation.
Here’s where it gets interesting….
The Yahoo article outlines, “There was an inappropriate level of attention to Assange“, by the CIA according to a national security council official. However, if you consider the larger ramifications of what Julian Assange represented to all of those people inside and outside government interests who created the Trump-Russia collusion/conspiracy, well, there was actually a serious risk.
Remember, in May 2017 Robert Mueller and Andrew Weissmann effectively took over the DOJ. The purpose of the Mueller investigation was to cover up the illegal operation that took place in the preceding year. The people exposed in the Trump-Russia targeting operation included all of those intelligence operatives previously outlined in the CIA, FBI and DOJ operations. These are the people John Durham did not indict.
The FBI submission to the Eastern District of Virginia Grand Jury in December of 2017 was four months after congressman Dana Rohrabacher talked to Julian Assange in August of 2017: “Assange told a U.S. congressman … he can prove the leaked Democratic Party documents … did not come from Russia.”
(August 2017, The Hill Via John Solomon) Julian Assange told a U.S. congressman on Tuesday he can prove the leaked Democratic Party documents he published during last year’s election did not come from Russia and promised additional helpful information about the leaks in the near future.
Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, a California Republican who is friendly to Russia and chairs an important House subcommittee on Eurasia policy, became the first American congressman to meet with Assange during a three-hour private gathering at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, where the WikiLeaks founder has been holed up for years.
Rohrabacher recounted his conversation with Assange to The Hill.
“Our three-hour meeting covered a wide array of issues, including the WikiLeaks exposure of the DNC [Democratic National Committee] emails during last year’s presidential election,” Rohrabacher said, “Julian emphatically stated that the Russians were not involved in the hacking or disclosure of those emails.”
Pressed for more detail on the source of the documents, Rohrabacher said he had information to share privately with President Trump. (read more)
Dana Rohrabacher later published this account of the events:
Knowing how much effort the CIA and FBI put into the Russia collusion-conspiracy narrative; and knowing that Assange could essentially destroy the baseline predicate for the entire Trump-Russia investigation – which included the use of Robert Mueller; it would make sense for corrupt government officials to take keen interest after this August 2017 meeting between Rohrabacher and Assange.
That contact between Rohrabacher and Assange explains why those same government officials would quickly gather specific evidence (related to Wikileaks and Bradley Manning) for a grand jury by December 2017.
Within three months of the grand jury seating (Nov/Dec 2017), the DOJ generated an indictment and sealed it in March 2018.
The EDVA then sat on the Julian Assange indictment while the Mueller/Weissman probe was ongoing.
As soon as the Mueller probe ended, on April 11th, 2019, a planned and coordinated effort between the U.K. and U.S. was executed; Julian Assange was forcibly arrested and removed from the Ecuadorian embassy in London, and the EDVA indictment was unsealed (link).
As a person who researched this fiasco, including the ridiculously false 2016 Russian hacking/interference narrative: “17 intelligence agencies”, Joint Analysis Report (JAR) needed for Obama’s anti-Russia narrative in December ’16, and then a month later the ridiculously political Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) in January ’17, this timing against Assange is not coincidental.
It doesn’t take a deep researcher to see the aligned Deep State motive to control Julian Assange, because the Mueller report was dependent on Russia cybercrimes, and that narrative is contingent on the Russia DNC hack story which Julian Assange disputes. Again, John Durham stayed away from it!
♦ This is critical. The Weissmann/Mueller report contains claims that Russia hacked the DNC servers as the central element to the Russia interference narrative in the U.S. election.
This claim is the fulcrum underpinning the Russia election interference narrative. However, this core and essential claim is directly disputed by Julian Assange, as outlined during the Dana Rohrabacher interview, and by Julian Assange’s on-the-record statements.
The predicate for Robert Mueller’s investigation was specifically due to Russian interference in the 2016 election.
The fulcrum for this Russia interference claim is the intelligence community assessment (Peter Strzok); and the only factual evidence claimed within the ICA is that Russia hacked the DNC servers; a claim only made possible by relying on forensic computer analysis from another Michael Sussmann partner, Shawn Henry at Crowdstrike, yes another DNC contractor and collaborator with the Clinton campaign.
The CIA held a massive conflict of self-interest problem surrounding the Russian hacking claim as it pertained to their own activity in 2016. The FBI and DOJ always held a massive interest in maintaining the Russian hacking claim. Robert Mueller and Andrew Weismann did everything they could to support that predicate; and all of those foreign countries whose intelligence apparatus participated with Brennan and Strzok also carried a self-interest in maintaining that Russia hacking and interference narrative.
Julian Assange was/is the only person with direct knowledge of how Wikileaks gained custody of the DNC emails; and Assange claimed he has evidence it was from an inside DNC leak, not from a DNC hack.
The Russian “hacking” claim was ultimately so important to the CIA, FBI, DOJ, ODNI and U.K Intelligence apparatus. Well, right there is the obvious motive to shut Assange down as soon as intelligence officials knew the Mueller report was going to be public. And that is exactly what Main Justice and the U.S. intelligence community did.
This is why John Durham never touched it.
All of them know what happened.
All of them know why Julian Assange was taken from the Embassy in London. A bag had to be thrown over Assange in order to retain the justification for the Weissmann/Mueller special counsel and the larger Russian election interference claims. None of them do not know this. They all know.
Start asking the right questions about the timeline of Assange being arrested. Ask about the DNC hack and Russian provenance according to Crowdstrike, not coincidentally a Ukrainian originating company. Ask key and specific questions about the FBI working with Crowdstrike and about the DOJ and EDVA case against Assange.
The people around the DC Deep State all know what happened. So does Wikileaks. SO DO WE, and SO DO YOU!
[Support CTH Here]
Wouldn’t surprise me in the least if the USG broke the deal. For those not familiar with the system, this is exactly how the “justice system” works on a daily basis. Lock people up, jerk them around until they plead guilty to something. This is why AG’s locally claim 98% conviction rates.
Sundance; Please stop calling it the Biden DOJ. There is the government, and then there are the selected in Congress and the White house who represent the government. Not the people.
It IS the Biden DOJ.
The six ways to Sunday crowd
After what the Australian government did to their citizens during covid Down Under would be the last place I’d feel safe. I pray the good citizens of Australia form a web of protection around Julian and his family.
I was thinking the same. He’s getting released to the OG prison colony and incubator for the machinations of “neo-democracy”.
There is one big flaw in your theory. All of the draconian covid lockdowns were enacted by State governments, not the Federal government. Australia is a federation of states. You’d be familiar with the idea of ‘state’s rights’ as it applies in the US? Well, same thing applies in Australia. The only extreme measure Australia’s federal govt took was to close the international border. Assange is safer in Australia than he would be in the US.
There is one big flaw in your theory. The states were using the Reserve Bank as their credit card to pay for their cost of the covid lockdowns. The Federal Government would have been within its rights to instruct the RBA to cease monetising state government debt, it even had the excuse of the unacceptable risk this was placing on the taxpayer.
The Federal Government did nothing.
Exactly. Plus the Fed gov turned a blind eye when the states mandated their populations to be medically experimented on by making it very difficult to financially survive. I had to take the booster to get back into my home state. a holes the lot of them.
DMJ you are incorrect. Each Australian state is sovereign. As sovereign states, each state issues state govt bonds when they want to raise funds. The state issued Bonds are tradeable on financial markets, as are any bonds issued by sovereign states, including the US and US states. Australia’s Reserve Bank can also buy and sell State issued Bonds, but in the main, Australian Banks are the main holders of State issued Bonds. Each Australian state is given a credit rating by international credit rating agencies, just like other governments around the world. The Australian Federal Govt cannot interfere with each state’s financial arrangements.
The Australian State Goverments did nothing that the FedGov did not want them to do.
It all a bit like pro wrestling, really.
One big show.
Your argument is flawed.
Freedom of speech in the US is officially protected by law.
Yet.
The US Government coerced/bribed Social media/tech and most other consequential companies to censor American citizens for them, in order to effectively circumvent US Constitutional protections on free speech.
There are “workarounds” to bypass any legal hurdles the FedGov are likely to encounter if strategic goals are at risk.
Airlines don’t want to comply with the Governments mask mandates/ injection policies?
No problem. Threaten to cancel their federal transport/shipping contracts.
Federal has control of the funding for a ton of state programs— state may have instituted lockdowns, but there was a gun to their heads called access to federal funding
JA is an interesting study. His mom was associated to The Family and Australian Cult, who some have linked to MK Ultra activities. Come to your own conclusions.
The Family, also known as the Santiniketan Park Association or the Great White Brotherhood, was an Australian New Age group formed in the mid-1960s under the leadership of Anne Hamilton-Byrne (born Evelyn Grace Victoria Edwards; 30 December 1921 – 13 June 2019).[1][2] The group taught a mixture of Western and Eastern religious doctrines, with Hamilton-Byrne claiming to have been a reincarnation of Jesus. It has widely been described as a cult.[1][3]
The group became the centre of controversy when its compound in Olinda, Victoria, was raided by police on 14 August 1987 amid allegations of child abuse. All children were removed from the premises, and were discovered to have been adopted through illegal means.[4] Hamilton-Byrne and her husband were eventually arrested in 1993 and charged with conspiracy to defraud and to commit perjury in relation to the adoption scams, but those charges were eventually dropped. She pleaded guilty to the remaining charge of making a false declaration and was fined $5,000.
I come to this site because the analysis and information rings true in a world where deceit overwhelms truth seemingly everywhere.
I don’t like the truth right now. God bless Sundance and those who shine the light of truth into the darkness.
Well, there is this…no comment necessary.
https://babylonbee.com/news/assange-plea-deal-includes-free-flight-home-on-a-boeing
heh
China really wants to build all the jets, don’t they?
The possible Trump second term is already bearing fruit.
I would not be surprised for Assange is being released to make sure he releases something damaging to Biden, and Biden only. Think sex tape, nothing that would blow back on Obama Inc. Then the DNC can ask for Joe to remove himself from the office and the ballot without having to get into a proxy fight with Jill over Biden.
Well there already are a bunch of sex tapes of hunter out there. Guo wengui’s news sites had them up for awhile back in 2020 . It was hardcore stuff
Trump missed his chance to pardon Assange. Now Assange will do whatever he must to stay alive and remain out of prison. Can anyone blame him? The guy has basically spent 10 years in prison already for his principles. Missed seeing his kids grow up.
Maybe, maybe not. It’s quite possible if President Trump had pardoned Julian Assange that the 2nd impeachment hearing in the Senate would have found PDJT guilty and that alone would have blocked him from running for President ever again.
PDJT knows when to pick which battles and which ones to save for a later day.
For once, I hope that you are not correct, Sundance. But when I learned of this thie morning, I immediately though HTF did this happen and who benefits, besides Jullian. It doesn’t make a lot of sinse.
When I heard it I thought whelp Trump just said he would pardon JA and now this happens so Trump can’t do the ‘getting out of jail’ part but he can still issue a pardon.
Is Stefan Harper still in Australia? Assange will NEVER be safe from 5 eyes unless he pulls a Snowden and goes to the Motherland. For his safety and that of his family, I hope he does get there. It’s still odd to even say that Russia is the safer place to be…
You talking about Stephen Harper ??? And if you are what does Stephen Harper have to do with anything?? I can remember Stephen trying to act all tough with Putin back in 2014 . .. neo con wannabe
Stefan Halper is prob in England and washington.
Stephen Harper is prob in canada and other spots
Harper Lee is dead
After reading this there is little doubt what will happen if Trump wins the election-they will start a war. When all else fails they take you to war.
Of course you could argue we are already in a war, at least that is what 2 active duty Air Force officers told me last week.
Trump told us that specifically when b10weap0n-c0v1d was unleased – he said “I’m a wartime president.”
“… Fifth Generation warfare is not waged against standing armies, but against everyday citizens. The war is not being fought in a battlefield, but in the Human mind. It’s being waged by our governments and the international organizations to which they belong; against each & every one of us, and is a batttle for full-spectrum dominance over every aspect of our lives.
… They will not stop until every person who resists them is subdued or eliminated…. “
~ Corbett Report,
{ https://www.corbettreport.com/5thgen/ }
NORFOLK, VA – Cognitive Warfare includes activities conducted in synchronization with other Instruments of Power, to affect attitudes and behaviours, by influencing, protecting, or disrupting individual, group, or population level cognition, to gain an advantage over an adversary.
Designed to modify perceptions of reality, whole-of-society manipulation has become a new norm, with human cognition shaping to be a critical realm of warfare.
Cognitive Warfare focuses on attacking and degrading rationality, which can lead to exploitation of vulnerabilities and systemic weakening.
~ FROM the NATO website
{ https://www.act.nato.int/activities/cognitive-warfare/ }
That makes sense to me. They did say the war will be fought from above, meaning in the air and space.
We have been in WWIII for a long time.
Many Master’s theses and PhD dissertations will be written about this period. All describing bad news for our government and the “Biden” administration.
I have one problem with this deal.
Julian Assange was never under the jurisdiction of the United States, broke no US laws and has ZERO RIGHT WHATSOEVER to plead away MY constitutional rights or bargain on his own behalf using MY constitutional rights as the chip. Especially when the constitution makes clear no such compromise is lawful for my government to undertake.
one of the conditions that will be placed on Assange, with this guilty plea, is that he will REMAIN on the “watch list”…the no fly list. and not just with the US policies (mostly secretive), but also including Australia.
This means that Assange will not be leaving australia for a very long time. This means anything he does is subject to australia’s quite open and not so secret laws that allow them to surveill ANYONE FOR ANY REASON AT ANY TIME< WITH NO FISA OR FISA LIKE APPARATUS. It’s an interesting review when you look outward away from the US to understand the scale of the secret police spy state in it’s broad breadth.
what this means is that assange will unlikely be able to continue doing the kind of work …as a publisher in the degree as his former wikileaks role. Australia fully cooperates and is very similar (but far more determined) as the USSG to stamp out wrong think. So if he attempts to return to his former work and publish, he will be arrested. It’s a certainty. And he cannot fly away and do that work elsewhere either. No fly list.
Australia, like the UK, will accommodate/agree/enforce all the legal AND UNSAID limits placed on him from this guilty plea.
a prisoner he will remain.
God Bless America
Silence is golden and as I said earlier this sounds like golden handcuffs to prevent President Trump from pardoning him. With a pardon Assange could be free, going wherever and continuing wikileaks exposures.
Boat.
Oligarch’s boat.
The Blob probably discovered that Trump was planning to claim he’d pardon Assange in the upcoming “debate” and took that younger vote attractor away from him.
the malarkey circus knew it would not be able to continue remanding Assange to bermarsh “awaiting” legal negotiations. Interestingly, the UK high court recognized that his rights to a speedy trial were being unnecessarily delayed, so sooner than later UK was going to release him unconditionally back to AUS, per his request.
This is why the US got involved quickly:
the real question..the most important question: why would UK and the US not settle on terms for his extradition?
because in the US, he would have rights (oddly, he would not have the same in the UK, “awaiting extradition on serious espionage allegations (yes, this was gamed out). These rights, once he was in the US, means he would have to be charged and given a speedy trial…and his right to bond/bail. this means he could talk about THINGS> And in discover, he could have evidence in cross exam.
that is exactly what the secret police state feared most…that Assange would actually have a trial in a court in the US.
see, it’s about discover and the very likely highly probable chance that eventually, he would find sympathy with people in power who would listen to his grievances. like actual journalists…who I will remind, have become a MAJOR TARGET of the secret police spy state. And when I say, journalists. I means people who are willing to do the work to get to a truth that is often dark, dirty, ugly, criminal and despicable. The secret police spy state has night terrors about people like Assange. the way he did it, has really never been done before. You go to a website and there is without dispute a method of falsifying every single document. And the documents are damning. It is literally evidence of corruption, repugnant and immoral and unethical behavior…from agencies all the way to the top and beyond the US borders, including the UK, aus, Germany, etc. the secret police state likes the dark coat of silence. They operate in the shadows. wikileaks was the light switch that made the rats race toward corners and then they reacted. We saw them …all of them. the list is quite extensive.
I digress. The work of wikileaks cannot be overstated in terms of importance to OUR TIME…
and the work remains unfinished. Assange was not just a messenger. He had/has high hopes that the the human race would realize that this kind of power in the hands of these filthy animals is far too destructive to the very fabric of humanity. that WE would respond and make a correction.
that has not really happened. the power remains fully with the secret police spy state AND it has grown out of the shadows and not is not subtle. it is showing it’s power and remains unchallenged.
challenge accepted.
God Bless America
Thank you for explaining the details so well. I have also long admired the bravery of Assange and wrote several pieces about him in relation to the astrological patterns of his releases.
But google hates my blog and delisted it all so sometimes I post a link to it in rebellion anyway.
https://mundane-astrology-notes.blogspot.com/2024/03/uranus-revolt-of-corporate-state.html
https://mundane-astrology-notes.blogspot.com/2024/02/jupiter-expanding-government-power.html
Now he needs to go underground, disappear. Build an impenetrable network. Arm up. Have his ratlines established. And tell the entire world every f–king thing he knows about the 2020 theft and the subsequent coverups. Tell it all. Every wicked deed. Every deliberate cover up and frame up. And every murder, from Seth Rich to Epstein.
F–k them all. Burn it to the ground. With them in it.
Sundance,
Reading this all again just re-emphasizes the incredible deep dive you did and the all consuming effort it took. Now that we are “here again” with the Assange “release” what are we to believe about Flynn and Byrne? Are they/were they bad guys who are now trying to act like victims? What is all of this?
Thanks! You are the only one -and I mean the only one – I know is honest and has done the meticulous research.
Assange said in an interview years ago before he was imprisoned that he had a “kill switch.” Who would he entrust these incriminating records to?
Far fetched posit, but I’m known for them….. the ‘we caught them all‘ guy. 🙂
a “kill switch” implies a veiled threat/promise to have damning information that would be shared in the instance of death.
Assange was not killed. He is very much alive.
I submit that his threat, veiled, was taken seriously by those whom he had very damning information and that is why he was not killed, but imprisoned…
in all of this, a point I must remind: it was a specific “journalist” at the guardian, who would receive the decryption keys from Assange to very highly classified material THAT ASSANGE MADE CLEAR HE DETERMINED TO BE OF SUCH GRAVE CONCERN THAT IT SHOULD NEVER BE PUBLISHED UNLESS REDACTED BY THE US GOVT (AND OTHERS). This gets lost in time and by the maddening manipulations of the “press”. The blame for publishing the contents of certain very highly classified materials would then be place on Assange, when the truth of the matter is that it was this fool at the guardian who published the decryption keys in a book he wrote and published to make money over the ordeal. Another key point to be made wrt to Assange: he did not publish WikiLeaks to make money, nor did he use this material as blackmail or compromise. That would be the likes of the moron at the guardian. The question in all of this is why the UK and the US never charged or investigated the UK guardian “reporter” for disclosing this material? There is plenty of reasons to believe he was an asset of the secret police spy state who set Assange up to take the blame for “compromising us agents in China” or some horse shit.
Let’s not forget how parts of this entire story actually happened.
another point and this really is something very important to remember when considering fraud in elections. See, hillary made it very clear that she believed and was very vocal about Assange receiving the death penalty. Even assassinated, she suggested not so subtly. Now step back and think about the left democrat voters. Does anyone really believe that the American left democrat voters would support a candidate who was advocating the killing of a journalist who uncovered and told the truth about corrution, murder, and racketeering at the highest levels of government? nonsense. We tend to forget, that the LEFT MEDIA is not the same as the left democrat voter. Yes, there are some radicals but mostly these are not people who have lost their ever loving minds. That would not happen until COVID hit (my opinion), or when President Trump came onto the scene. AT THE TIME, it made no sense that anyone of a sound mind would support hillary Clinton. the left after all blamed bush, the nemesis of the Clintons, for the Iraq war, the disingenuous and manipulative way he lied his way into war.
what we must learn from this, is that the media manipulates the narrative. it pretends to not know things but also creates completely false narratives that are echo chambered non stop in cable news. Over time, this gives the impression of the opinion and sentiment of the people…it does not do that. It distorts the opinion and sentiment of the people.
when THE PEOPLE fully recognize this…I submit we are in stage 3 – awareness, specifically, about COVID, mrna and the dotard in chief, Joe malarkey and the fraid called election 2020, then the people will have to come to terms with a new paradigm.
that there is in fact a deep state and it’s voice is the media….a powerful and loud and directed siren that has for a very long time baked up mountains of horse shit and served it to the world.
THIS IS WHY THE MEDIA TURNED AGAINST ASSANGE AND WIKILEAKS.
see, WikiLeaks could not be allowed to published, raw, falsifiable, uncurated, unredacted truths. The entire media reeled in terror that it’s “institutional power” to manipulate and filter truth would be replaced with this new form of journalism.. I submit, the ONLY TRUTHFUL AND POWERFUL JOURNALISM there is. When you get evidentiary material and you publish it with zero opinion and commentary…is the most powerful kind of reporting information there is. the reader decides, without the interference of opinions, skepticism, emotives, political caliber, and financial concern. The information just IS. And you get to decide what to make of it. Anyone reading wikileaks (I still recommend it to understand how important this kind of reporting is…a gold standard in my book), learns very quickly how much the people have been misled and HOW INEFFECTIVE ON PURPOSE THE MEDIA HAS BECOME.
God Bless America
“… A large international operation directed by the FBI/CIA and domestic operations seemingly directed by Peter Strzok operating with a foot in both agencies. [Strzok gets CIA service coin] … ”
Is that what 30-pence received just after he allowed congress to cert1fy the st0len eIect10n? That handshake immediately after that caused him to look down at something in his right palm?
???
Asking for a friend.
Timing of this makes me suspicious. Could it be that Biden will use this in the debate. Saying something like; “Under Trump Assange was indicted, but I cut a deal to set him free, so who is really threatening your freedoms”. Not sure how that would land or how he would make it clear to those not in the weeds on this. But I believe some angle like this could be one of the surprises they have promised.
Julian is headed to a former penal colony on an island. Given Oz’s lockdown protocol Julian has a better than even chance of being Epsteined, JFK’d, RFK’d, Sethed, Breitbarted, Arkancied (sp).
Their side all recruited and groomed: Victoria Nuland, Samantha Power, Barack Obama, Tony Fauci,
Joe Biden, Mike Morell ( A dime a dozen )
.
Our side 100% organically grown: ( In no particular order ) Rush Limbaugh, Mark Steyn, Mark Robinson, Neil Oliver, Julian Assange, Ben Carrson, Donald J. Trump, Sundance, Andrew Brietbart ( Original articles, all on loan from G-D. )
.
Please feel free to add to both lists.
🤔
Ooh maybe this is a move to scare off Hillary!
Aren’t there some Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives who would like to ask Julian Assange some questions? Did they have the presence of mind to get a subpoena ready to serve him during his brief, high-speed, very remote court appearance on U.S. soil?
Whose jet?
The hearing’s started
FYI Sundance, Got this on the account I receive twatter emails on, so at least that is not being throttled:
🤨
What is remaining?
I’d wager anything that Assange’s plea deal required a statement saying Russia hackers sent him the information from the DNC servers and a NDA silencing Assange for life.
The giant house of lies was all wrapped up in a plea deal bow.
The UK holds a general election July 4th and Rishi Sunak and the incumbent party is expected to lose badly. France has a snap election coming up and Macron is expected to lose badly. Biden is on track to lose badly.
I suspect the Deep State is scurrying around trying to tidy up loose ends and take some wild-cards off the table before they lose a lot of control and are forced to work around a bunch of new leaders.
Better to get Assange off the radar, someplace low-key down in Australia, now while they can rather than deal with the uncertainty of later. (probably with a non-public Non-Disclosure Agreement (aka “Hush Money”) to keep him quiet as part of the plea-deal.)
Assange is a loose end. Orban is a loose end. Fico is a loose end. Zelensky is a loose end. Putin is a loose end. Trump is a loose end, Hunter Biden is a loose end. — all people who know too much and have a history of going off in directions the Deep State cannot control
Surprisingly well written article in the local CBS online news channel on today’s court hearing in Saipan by Julian Assange:
https://www.2news.com/news/wikileaks-founder-julian-assange-sentenced-in-plea-deal/article_aa3b3f7a-335f-11ef-818b-5ba5e7505fb4.html#tncms-source=article-nav-next
In the article it appears Julian Assange has agreed that Wikileaks will destroy certain documents it has obtained.
Sell- out?
I’m liking this Orban guy more and more.
Still a criminal in my book. And this was all scripted drama in my opinion.
All I know is I pray for his safety and that of his family. I admire his wife and brother being so loyal and dedicated to him. Lesser people would have abandoned him. I hope he can get outside in the fresh air and sunshine feel the sand between his toes and have water lapping on his feet w/his kids and wife at his side followed by his favorite dinner. I also pray he and his family have quality people helping him w/his integration to freedom, at least freedom from a jail cell. FWG and their evil.
Seth Rich didn’t kill himself………….
I almost could spit my teeth out (except I don’t have dentures) and throw up after reading this post. And I apologize for not reading all comments before posting. Its been a very long and hard day on my farmlet.
In a nutshell, and at my very best un cynical, what won’t the Dems do to get more votes? Free Julian. Uh huh. What for? To go back home and die in the arms of his wife? How gracious of them. SPIT.
Would love to hear Hilary and Mark Warner’s thoughts on this. “pardon.” I love Julian Assange, and have been watching them try to kill him for so long now, I don’t even remember.
The criminal crime syndicate claiming they are pardoning JA is the most CYNICAL and disturbing thing I’ve read since Seth Rich was killed. Its now open season on JA.
I pray for Julian. I don’t know if he will ever get his wings back. But thank you JA for exposing the CROOKS and LIARS. Their time is gonna come.
Out of the frying pan and into the fire,
as the heat starts getting turned up higher.
I would be choosing a destination outside of the West that didn’t have extradition to any of the 5 eyes.
While anything is possible and nothing would be shocking, don’t think he’ll be doing any Brandon or WEF speaking tours or attending their parties.
Byrne has been significantly vocal of late.
A lot of words written… and none mention Trump could have pardoned Assange.
Sad on both.