Rather than write 10,000 highly specific and legally granular words to deconstruct the Trump indictment, I will share the opinion of others with supporting analysis and add some substance to the issues. Later I will compile all the various points of analysis into one very granular article.
First, it is important to always remember why this indictment is taking place. The DOJ, specifically Lisa Monaco, are continuing the offensive against Trump in large part to cover for the actions of the Obama administration in the originating targeting of their political opposition. Originating Spygate operations (’15-’16), Russiagate (’16-’17), Mueller (’17-’19), Impeachment #1 (’19-’20), Durham (’19-’23) and Jack Smith ’22-present, are all part of one long continuum of weaponized DOJ and FBI operations. The entirety of the effort is to protect the actions taken by the Obama administration. [Note to congress: Questioning Durham this month is defense key #1]
In this interview {Direct Rumble Link} Jeff Clark gives his opinion of the statutory weaknesses that exist in the case as outlined in the indictment. The first two defense approaches will likely be: (1) the Presidential Records Act supersedes the issues of document holding as noted in the use of the Espionage Act. (2) However, if the Espionage Act [Statute 793(e)] has to be defended, the originating issue of “unauthorized possession” will be the second approach heading to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals. WATCH:
Granular note, putting aside the fact that classification is irrelevant to the statute being used, within the indictment please notice how the DOJ states 102 classified documents [pg 27], some that were never marked classified as noted in the indictment [count 11, page 30] but defined as classified after DOJ review, were discovered after the Trump affirmation of compliance in July 2022. This is the predicate for the FBI raid. Again, a total of 102 documents were identified as classified by the FBI/DOJ.
They were unable to use classification status as a legal mechanism to attack President Trump; instead, they use the non-production as an evidence enhancement to the ridiculous claim that Trump lied to them (sec 1001); but notice how there are only 31 documents [31 counts] outlined as national defense security issues. This would mean approximately 70 classified documents are memory holed by this special counsel.
70 defined “classified” documents retrieved, no description provided, those documents not a part of any legal contention – they just disappear. I suspect we know what those sets of documents pertained to, and they have everything to do with DOJ and FBI conduct in Russiagate.
CTH has a years-long research library on all of these Trump-Russia investigative issues, including the in-real-time background stories that encompass them, and that library is massive.
If you have a specific question, ask me in the comments section and I will do my earnest best to review and answer.
Tell me what questions you have, and I will do my best.
Be of good cheer, I really don’t think this indictment will past the first defense challenge, The Presidential Records Act.
Don’t forget the lying deceitful FBI/DOJ could have planted anything they wanted as there was no oversight.
Love you, MAGA Brother!
👊👊🇺🇸🇺🇸❤️❤️🙏🏻🙏🏻
Any chance the judge will dismiss the whole suit as the documents were declassified?
Kash Patel’s take on the indictment is a solid introduction
from The Epoch Times, Kash’s Corner
40 minutes
https://rumble.com/v2t9gw0-trumps-indictment-and-the-two-tier-justice-system-kash-patel.html
Of course these charges are bogus and wholly unjustified, if precedence and jurisprudence mean anything these days, not to mention equal application of said law. The “missing” documents must be produced and their general content – if not the entire text – made public to the American public so they can see the corruption themselves. Obama must be exposed and his entire scheme to control election outcomes through the weaponization of government against the people laid bare.
Our government is broken, as is the entirety of our public institutions. Corrupted by nature, and activated by Obama to achieve the goal of all tyrants; the acquisition and exercise of power against the citizens they ostensibly represent. Destroying this must be the primary goal of the next president, and only Donald Trump has that ability, IMO. The best way to start dismantling this is by taking a wrecking ball to the Federal bureaucracy starting with:
There are numerous other actions that could be take, including/especially prosecuting anyone involved with the weaponization of government.
Not bad for the first day…
Are the documents involved in the indictment alleged to be originals or copies? I think the distinction is significant. If the individual destroys an original government document, how can you prove it? That’s what Hillary Clinton did. Destroy original government documents (emails) which could not be recovered.
Is the indictment in Florida a set up? It is bad enough to get thrown out, but then a second one can come down in DC. Are they clever enough to try something like that? If that seems likely, can the Florida judge hold the prosecutors in contempt, stay a jail sentence on the condition that there will be no more nonsense, and if they go ahead in DC, lock them up?
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2023/06/same_plot_different_actors.html
You’re right, the indictment should not pass the first defense challenge. However, Trump has a habit of hiring poor lawyers who undermine his case and lengthen the process considerably. If the past is prologue, I expect this will end up with a trial, maybe a guilty verdict, and a long appeal process. And it all could be avoided if Trump hired better attorneys.
The problem is that in order to hire a lawyer, he or she MUST have a secret clearance designation and those are hard to fins. Also, attorneys (who are being asked to represent DJT) are being threatened with disbarment and judgeships and anything else the DOJ and the FBI can cook-up.
I’m thinking the FBI raid wasn’t recorded from start to finish. Did everyone charged with evidence collection or handling have body cams or maybe a helmet GoPro? I’m wondering how precise the logs are when the search began. Who found something and where’d they found it? Agents wouldn’t allow anyone to observe the search, so is it very clear what they were doing the entire time? What I’m try to get at is when and where was the 31 docs found? Were the 31 docs in a folder Trumps’ lawyers gave to the agents on May 11, or June 3? Is the DoJ indicting Trump using documents they already had in their control prior to the raid?
So it’s all horse shit by leftist treasonous assholes