Kamala Harris hired Eric Holder to do the background vetting on Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, prior to the announcement of Walz being her VP candidate.
Keep in mind, Barack Obama and Eric Holder do not have any issues with Tim Walz as the VP candidate. Factually, Walz is a very unstable person, prone to an intemperate disposition, has no problem targeting children for his fetish ideology under the guise of gender reassignment (cutting off the genitals of children), and is a proud Marxist.
Against the backdrop of ‘who he is’ the difference between ‘who he presents himself to be‘ is the real issue. The embellishment on his military record is just one facet of the mask he wears.
Remember, for the professional left, especially Barack Obama and Eric Holder, fabrication and lies are viewed as positive traits. Through the prism of controlling behavior, controlling what people do and ultimately leveraging/threatening a person to ensure adherence to an objective, the lies are part of how professional leftists control people. This is all very dark and twisted stuff.
During any ‘vetting’ process, Eric Holder and Barack Obama would view any “stolen valor” type issue as a net positive. The voting left are essentially “NPCs,” brainless nonthinkers who follow the hive mindset.
Democrats will not be at all bothered to support a candidate who is a known liar with a sketchy background in manipulating children. After all, Walz went into teaching for a reason and the professional left now consider ‘grooming’ and youth exploitation as a part of the modern social norm.
I mean, seriously, think about it without pretense. Sexualizing children has gone all the way to cutting off genitals to make the adults around the children feel better. What we are discussing is the voting pattern of the people who openly do not see a problem with sexploitation of children. Do you think embellishing a military record matters to this tribe?
