For his Twitter monologue episode 7, Tucker Carlson walks through the post COVID new authoritarian model of ‘western democracy’, a system of dictatorial fiat and unilateral power intent on retention of control. {Direct Rumble Link}
Within our new system of “western democratic norms” authoritarianism is embraced by both wings of the UniParty vulture as it ensures power for those who benefit. From the dual system of U.S. justice to the dictatorship now present in Ukraine, the common thread is power by a select group of system operators with large control mechanisms.
The retention of this power structure requires the passing of the baton to the next loyalist of the regime. In the case of Joe Biden, Tucker foresees the rise of California Governor Gavin Newsom. I predicted a very specific flow for this transition a year ago and fully agree with Carlson’s prediction. WATCH:
[NOTE: I find it interesting [at 06:29] that Carlson notes the Ukraine war is only opposed by “one opponent”, yet he never mentions the man’s name, Donald Trump. It is a small datapoint, but an omission datapoint nonetheless enhanced by the chosen platform of the Carlson broadcast. I notice nuance. Keep watching.]
Tucker balancing his interests (and Elon’s) in not mentioning Trump
No sweat
?? When observing how the Establishment Liars keep using “preserve democracy” to justify their continued dictatorial style of governing, President Trump’s name would logically not be part of that discussion. Your attempt to throw shade on Tucker (and Elon) falls flat.
Shade!!!
Tucker being diplomatic
I might suggest
It’s allowed
Trump is a big boy
Tuck Tuck the Jesuit is a puppet just like the rest including Elon who people thought was some kind of savior.
Tuck Tuck is one of the destroyers and his pompous self righteous past should prove it but some are blind.
He’s Episcopalian.
Not much difference.
And, he’s a Camelot, er, RFK, Jr. supporter; he’ll never dwell on his anti-Trumpness, it’d cost him a lot of audience; amazing to know that, after sixty years, there are still lots of Camelot dreamers out there, TC is one of them.
You know that how? Citation please.
Citation it yourself; I’m reading the stitches on a fastball while you whiff on a knuckler.
Agree. Tucker is working ‘with’ Elon.
Who really called the shots on Twitter before Elon?
Who really calls the shots on Twitter with Elon?
Who sends out “talking points” to all MSM, including Fox, everyday to this very day? (Mockingbird Media)
[Think about the many clips of expanding collages of news media displaying 1, then 2, then growing exponentially clips of ‘reporters’ talking the same theme and/or using the same terminology that have been released online over the last few years, revealing collusion on news stories that belie a ‘central’ source of dissemination.]
Where else could Tucker get “his talking points” without being on Twitter?
Tucker is not allowed by non-compete agreement to work for any other MSM. Mainstream conventional wisdom is that Tucker’s voice is indispensable for the conservative movement by conservatives. Don’t you think ‘other’ entities feel that Tucker’s voice is indispensable to get ‘their’ message out to conservatives?
Tucker could use Rumble, or something similar, if he really wanted to. But he doesn’t. He uses the Twat!
Interesting use of the word “comrade” by Sundance referring to Tucker. Coincidence? Subliminal message? Freudian slip?
Said it about both of these characters from jump start (and caught Hell about it). But minds changed, or at least started thinking, on Elon. And now, again, Tucker?
Controlled assets!
Think outside the box! ‘THEY’ are!
Respectfully disagree, BK.
I don’t believe for a minute that Tucker is working “with”Elon; taking any cues or suggestions from Elon, or anyone.
Tucker is independent in choice of topic and how he presents it. It’s precisely his independent mode of operating that got him “fired” (regardless of how Fox wants to couch the terms) from FNC.
He chose Twitter SOLELY on the basis that (a) it reaches a larger and more diverse audience than any other platform in existence and (b) he took Elon at Elons word that it would be a free speech platform.
Tucker SPECIFICALLY STATED in the beginning that he has NO arrangement with Musk and if he is obstructed for any reason due to topic or content of his presentations, he is not worried because he knows there are other platforms that will not censor him at all. Such as Rumble and Truth Social. But Twitter still has the largest reach per his research.
Tucker has always addressed topics of his choosing, not as dictated or even suggested to him by content moderators on the network or platform on which he is producing his “show”.
His current Twitter monologues are shorter than his shows were on FNC, so each episode is not going to address every topic that’s been in the news for the time since his prior episode. He chooses the topic that’s bugging him to “get it off his chest”, so to speak. I believe he has more topics in his queue than just current events, but will choose whatever he thinks is most needed to be made public, in his own estimation.
IMHO it’s as simple as that. Occams Razor simple. I believe it’s a misjudgment to accuse Tucker of bending to the will (to any degree) of the platform owner.
He’s created a huge audience by following his gut for topic and content. I see no reason to second guess him at this time.
Peace, brother.
PS – if Elon is truly in need of advertising $$$, he’s not going to risk losing what’s quickly become Twitters largest single audience attraction by muzzling the guy. IMHO.
Keep believing that!
People say a lot of things.
And I’m not suggesting that he is bending to the platform’s ‘owner,’ but those who call the shots thru the back door, just like at Fox.
And like I said, a lot of folks gave me Hell about Elon at the beginning. Not so much anymore.
Elon is an ***entirely*** different person than Tucker, BK. He has a huge costly enterprise to maintain. Of course he will adjust his operating “rules” from time to time to optimize the survival of his businesses. I’ve no argument with that.. it’s just a reality of business management.
Tucker has no such level of ongoing enterprise with a huge operating overhead. Tucker is already independently wealthy and is driven only by his desire to report the truth as he believes it to be to the largest audience possible.
I don’t think it’s accurate to put both men in the same bucket of motivations by any reasoning. Tucker will leave Twitter in a heartbeat if he senses any pushback by Elon on content.
IMHO, Tucker will “moderate” himself as we each do per our own self-learned societal standards that we each have determined to be acceptable for public discourse. Having developed his career within corporate organizations using long-established generally accepted broadcast standards, I expect Tucker will continue to present his subject matter using language that remains somewhat within those standards, while the subject matter itself will be of his personal choosing independent from any previous corporate standards or edicts that had restricted him.
Chy-nah owns Elon
“Owns”? Don’t think so. Elon will do his best to operate those parts of his business that deal with China in a manner that does not offend them. But the parts of his businesses that don’t depend on China he apparently operates as he sees fit without any regard to China’s feelings.
Good points that you make.
Let me approach this another way and if you still don’t have any doubts, at least a few, that’s ok.
Sundance today: nuance concerning not mentioning Trump’s name.
Sundance a day or two ago on another post: those “who OWN AND CONTROL WASHINGTON DC” & specifically stated “globalists and deep state.”
These last two overarching entities are both aligned against Trump and Trump only. They will accept any other candidate from either party over Trump in the end. Never Trumpers.
Fox has already committed to RDS (controlled opposition). Musk has committed to RDS (controlled opposition).
Fox – globalist controlled
Twitter – deep state controlled. Connect the dots.
Tucker’s audience will follow him anywhere, if they are that loyal, ie Rumble or similar outlet.
There is nothing magic about his using Twitter for maximum audience size. It is however, a win for Elon to try and raise ad revenue.
Tucker is using the terms democracy (instead of republic) and ‘dictatorship.’ An argument can be made for psyop conditioning for public consumption to condition acceptance of a coming full blown dictatorship.
Tucker does not only not mention Trump, but has had no significant reporting defending Trump against Smith et al and their ridiculous charade.
Tucker “… is driven to report the Truth as he believes it to be….” That is an assumption only. There is no way to know what anyone else’s intents are.
Lastly, if there is anything even possible or plausible about my arguments, shouldn’t that at least cause one to proceed with caution.
“Comrade” Tucker Carlson – SD
A mystery wrapped in a riddle wrapped in an enigma; OR, a message within a message!
Peace back to you!
Notice how Tucker could also be menacing people, in one video he talks about the tyranny that’s coming yet he and his are already surveilling people, amassing a database, etc.
Tucker is part of the Deep State, folks. Please accept the reality. Yes, he believes he’s in ‘the right’ and yes, it’s possible/probable that there are conflicting factions within that Deep State. But he is one of them, plain and simple.
People’s problem is that he is both incredibly slick and sincere at the same time. Most people want to believe they are in ‘the right.’ That level of power rationalizes itself particularly easily; collateral damage is an integral part of their world, their reflexive thinking. It is what it is, and Tucker Swanson McNear Carlson is who he is. My mantra: forgive Tucker and you can forgive yourself for wanting to believe in him. Once you forgive yourself, he no longer has the same power over you. He will, of course, make videos and propaganda trying to spin the truth I and others on here point out. And he, of course, thinks he’s doing ‘good.’ To the elites, we are the flock that need herding, corralling, controlling.
And, he and his read on this site like vultures. Assume everything we write is studied and analyzed and often rebutted or riffed off of. This is how controlled opposition works. We are the vanguard they manage. In their minds, it is for the good of country. Whose country exactly, though, is the question…
Wow! Prescient.
There is a hobgoblin under every bed. Those “in the know” like Madame Defarge will out the betrayers. The ‘facts’ speak for themselves. Off with his head.
Idiocy,
Idiocy indeed.
Playing devil’s advocate here, I completely understand the reasoning behind ‘managing’ the behemoth known as USA and the free world. After all, we can’t have our economic and foreign policy going topsy turvy, and jerked back and forth with each incoming administration, can we?
A steady hand at the wheel to steer this ship is therefore both prudent and wise, right Tucker?
That said, the “steady hand” at the wheel certainly cannot be Lucifer’s! Enslaving and dominating humanity, no less hijacking our free will and ultimately our souls, is definitely a *no-go* zone, even if we ARE a bunch of ignorant sheeple who need to be “managed” somehow.
Proceed cautiously there, Tuck. God will *not* be mocked!
I see a lot of assertions about TC, and not a lot of fact.
Other than talking about some things and not talking about others, explain please exactly how you know…not guess, but know with no doubt, verifiable facts only…that TC is controlled opposition.
I’m an agnostic, I can believe he is and also I can believe he’s not. I do believe TC tries to present only facts and wraps opinion around that. I don’t think he’s doing this for money. Ideology probably. But 🤷♀️
Well for starters an intimate of mine was part of his friends circle in college. I have existed in worlds very close to or intersecting with his in my own right. I can’t fully give the evidence here, unfortunately. I can say with 100% certainty the guy has access to surveillance state info, of the kind that only the alphabet agencies can get through spying on innocent citizens’ personal communications. It is 100% certain he is in league with badass spooks. What other kinds are there?
His hypocrisy gets me the worst. Like I said, it is what it is and he is who he is. He probably was menacing and conditioning people, on one level, in that early Twitter monologue about government tyrants surveilling dissidents’ every move.
Tucker doesn’t write all his stuff, duh. He has researchers, writers, staff. He doesn’t mean to be a bad guy. That’s not why he took the job, and he inherited most of it anyway. He does like the money, and probably the attention, the power. The rich and elite, especially in the governmedia, are like domesticated wild animals. Their true nature is wild, self-serving, and tunnel-visioned, ultimately. Tucker Carlson is just a more interesting version of a cute raccoon in your neighborhood with its human-like opposable thumbs, big eyes and plucky chutzpah. Never turn your back on one, though; those hands are utterly filthy and homicidal, its eyes beady and narrow if you dare to really study them.
Barring the homicidal maniacs in our midst ..which hopefully are few and far between.. I don’t believe that anybody views themselves as evil, necessarily. They just want their slice of the pie and, in some cases, the whole pie. And they don’t much care who they trample over to attain it.
God sees all.
OMG, you just gave me the ‘nail in the coffin’ evidence conclusive proof from a semi-direct source of what I had already concluded from overwhelming long term circumstantial evidence.
I had little doubt in my convictions about this before you made this comment.
I have absolutely none left!
Thank you, Laila!
Most welcome. Glad I convinced someone!
I should add, I’m about 95% certain DeSantis has access to the same information that Tucker does that is culled from personal communications. I do not know how information is shared, but I’ve seen them work the same batch simultaneously and in a sort of tandem.
Facts Laila, not aspersions.
What is an ‘aspersion’ there? I sincerely apologize, but I cannot divulge the kind of pure empirical ‘facts’ some justifiably crave. I’m already treading on extremely thin ice. I give you my word and my 100% certainty. This certainty comes from empirical facts, not just strong or supported intuition. I’ve already said too much and it is no exaggeration to say I swim in very dangerous waters. People can decide for themselves whether they think TC is a white or black hat, or somewhere in between.
ETA: The notion that even a ‘white hat’ is truly white is part of what I and many others are critiquing. There are no real white hats at TC’s level. There are players, maybe a type of warrior for those who choose to view them sympathetically. But none are innocent in his arena. The real white hats tend to be mid-level types. So I’d conclude that, by definition, TC’s ilk are all a shade of black or gray, depending on one’s perspective. Mine might sound jaded, but it comes from real-life experience and what to me seems like basic common sense.
When I watched the Tucker episode where he said Hunter Biden was his neighbor and a good guy, that did it for me.
Since then, I have taken what Tucker reports with a grain of salt.
Yes, he has touched on some heavy subjects to gain MAGA interests, yet reined it in. No “Rest of the Story,” with him.
“Upon his graduation from Trinity College in 1991, Carlson sought to join the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) but was rejected. On the advice of his father, himself a former newspaper and television reporter, Carlson turned to journalism, taking a position as a fact-checker for the conservative journal Policy Review and later writing op-eds for the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette in Little Rock, Arkansas. ”
Sooo he applied for the CIA and was rejected then went into journalism in Little Rock in 1991, the year Bill Clinton announced his run.
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Tucker-Carlson
Sigh. I’m going to take up a new hobby and live life to its fullest.
Yeah, and Gloria Steinem only worked briefly for the CIA as some anti-war correspondent or something, never as a feminist sh*tstirrer. Even as a little kid I suspected something was very contrived with her, and I was raised by a screeching feminist in the 1070’s.
Was he really rejected???
And if so, could he still be a ‘contractor?’
I doubt he was truly rejected; that sounds like a smokescreen to me. Skeptics know the CIA and the media have been intersected since the former’s inception. They probably thought this up to camouflage what would be obvious to some people, and TC’s goofy brattiness might feed into the notion that the Agency rejected him. It’s also part of why he convinces so many people, which they would sense. He could be a ‘contractor,’ I suppose, though. What’s the difference really?
“Sundance today: nuance concerning not mentioning Trump’s name.”
I am not sure why Sundance thought that to be of significance in THIS episode. I suggest you and anyone else who holds the same concern to go back and re-visit the video in its entirety. Maybe listen twice. Maybe what I am about to state will then become clear.
The entire video is focused on the blatant hypocrisy of those who have repeatedly used the word “democracy” to associate with the war in Ukraine and to justify totalitarian (undemocratic) actions under that false assumption. The entire focus of the first half of this episode was the hypocrisy of supporting the Ukraine war and the Ukraine leader Zelensky who has in reality SUSPENDED democracy and threatens to do so cavalierly in the future. Yet U.S. hypocritical politicians AND media “intelligentsia” go right along with Zelensky, want to keep sending him money and they use the word “democracy” in their obviously false justifications. Tucker correctly calls out the demagoguery of those using “war” to justify their unconstitutional, dictatorial actions by using the war as an “emergency” excuse.
Tucker then shreds Joe Biden’s regime (because they support Zelensky’s actions) as Tucker calls out Biden’s corruption and taking bribe money. Tucker then (starting around 6:00 in the 12 minute video) lambastes the blatant hypocrisy of the Establishment in using a fake emergency (“covid” or “war”) to target (in a dictatorial style that ignores the Constitution) political opponents who are not guilty of any of this, or throw one of them in jail ….without mentioning Trump’s name.
I fully believe that Tucker was strategically correct to NOT mention Trump’s name. President Trump has never misused the word ‘democracy’ and has never once supported the Ukraine war mongering using “democracy” or any excuse. Had Tucker mentioned Trump’s name, it would have re-focused the monologue onto Trump, instead of on the totalitarian criminals who were the intended focus of the monologue. Inserting “Trump” into the discussion would also give the anti-Trump political & media liars some material to misquote and mischaracterize to directly cast more ad hominem upon PDJT. Tucker didn’t give them that opportunity to use his own words against Trump. I personally believe that demonstrates Tucker’s improving strategic understanding of his medium and I applaud his nuanced forethought.
“Sundance a day or two ago on another post: those “who OWN AND CONTROL WASHINGTON DC” & specifically stated “globalists and deep state.”
These last two overarching entities are both aligned against Trump and Trump only. They will accept any other candidate from either party over Trump in the end. Never Trumpers.
Fox has already committed to RDS (controlled opposition). Musk has committed to RDS (controlled opposition).
Fox – globalist controlled
Twitter – deep state controlled. Connect the dots.”
No argument on the facts but none of that – as you listed it – was specifically included in the intentional, relatively narrow focus of Tucker’s monologue in Episode 7.
“Tucker’s audience will follow him anywhere, if they are that loyal, ie Rumble or similar outlet.”
Agree !
” There is nothing magic about his using Twitter for maximum audience size. It is however, a win for Elon to try and raise ad revenue.”
I disagree based on my experience and use of multiple social media apps . Twitter has a very large, very established. and more politically diverse audience than does Rumble AT THIS TIME. Twitter is already a well-established app on far more devices than Rumble, despite Rumble’s large and increasing user base since it began about 3 years ago. I personally like Rumble very much but I use Twitter for content that just doesn’t yet make it to Rumble.
“Tucker is using the terms democracy (instead of republic) and ‘dictatorship.’ An argument can be made for psyop conditioning for public consumption to condition acceptance of a coming full blown dictatorship.”
Again, this was outside of the limited scope that Tucker wanted to address in Episode 7, a 12 minute long video.
“Tucker does not only not mention Trump, but has had no significant reporting defending Trump against Smith et al and their ridiculous charade.
Refer back to my first point about purposefully not mentioning President Trump by name in THIS particular episode.
Tucker “… is driven to report the Truth as he believes it to be….” That is an assumption only. There is no way to know what anyone else’s intents are.”
OK. That actually makes a stronger argument for not assigning malign motivation to why he did not name Trump or “globalists” since we factually don’t know precisely why he didn’t address your preferences. Personally, I am fine with your or Sundance’s concerns being expressed herein since that’s what we do in the Treehouse Comments sections.
I have been carefully listening to and watching Tucker deliver each of these monologues on Twitter, watching twice or three times in some instances to ensure I didn’t miss any important nuanced messages if they were deliberately obscured or ambiguous. He is now using a format that is only slightly modified from that which he used in his Fox 8:00pm opening monologues. He delivers the full content within the shortened timeframe. He knows there is no remaining show time in which to further explore any points made in the monologue. He also does this knowing there are no guests lined up to interview whose comments will reinforce what he said in the opening monologue. His intended points must be communicated in 7 or 15 or 12 minutes…
In conclusion, Tucker is now using a shortened monologue format and must therefore avoid any temptation to include any name(s) or topic(s) the mere mention of which would demand a longer discussion for context.
I remain steadfast in my opinion that he’s presenting the topic in the way he believes will best communicate the subject of that speech to his audience. President Trump was provably never a part of the hypocritical group (who used “saving democracy” as an excuse for totalitarian behavior) about which Tucker is opining in this episode.
Fair points and well argued. We’ll see how it pans out.
To be honest, I hope that I am completely wrong about Tucker, but I just see too many coincidences and red flags that give me pause.
My overarching intent is this: don’t go all in on Tucker! Always view with skepticism for future precautionary reasons – better be safe than sorry.
Old Southern sayin’ (that has always worked for me in the long run): “Don’t believe anything you hear, only half of what you see.”
Great discussion though!!
Always view with skepticism for future precautionary reasons – better be safe than sorry.
Great advice, and I hate to say it but we need to keep that in mind about ALL candidates/politicians as well.
People! When did you start designating ANYONE else to think for you? None of these people are sanctified prophets. They are still part of the media.
They do what they do– say what they say. That is their business.
I frequently agree with Tucker. Sometimes Musk is spot on. Both are amusing. I consider the information provided and form my own thoughts.
I agree with you, and would urge others to let up on the loyalty oaths and hair-splitting over which personality is sufficiently loyal or not. I get it that we find ourselves in an environment where deceivers and false prophets are legion, but I am skeptical that this requires so much focus on the individual rather than the message. I don’t think it matters a great deal what currents run in the heart of Elon for example, rather what is important is that he has opened a window, maybe only temporarily, and we ought to be about using that opportunity to present arguments, rather than religious tests. I have faith in Tucker, and pray that he does not disappoint, but I don’t need him to be perfect. Good is good enough, and what he is doing, i think is damned good. My entire faith is reserved for the Lord, and I’ll take what I can use from other imperfect men, even myself.
👍👍👍
I think you both make good points! We’ll have to see how things shake out.
Nuance is wasted on many people as IMO they are simply too self absorbed or just lack intellectual curiosity.
One of the beauties of the CTH for me, is that expands my mind and gets me thinking “outside the box”
I was having coffee with a 70 year old veteran big city cop.. yesterday morning ( one of the good guys)
His background is Canadian Prairie farming, and over the decades he has bought 1/4 sections of land ( 160 acres) when he could afford it and now owns a fair number of sections, most he leases out.
He travels east each fall to work the harvest at a cousins farm.
He is a huge President Trump fan, despises all and everything Liberal far more than me, and that is saying something.
Yet yesterday on his phone I opened TCTH in an effort to get him to read one of the articles.
He couldn’t…frankly, for now at least it is too “ heavy” for him.
He gets it, but nuance is not his thing!
Cheers, and thanks to all!
Howdy Dekester -I agree with your point that CTH and especially some of the Treepers here get me to thinking outside my comfort zone. And others force me to reassert my core beliefs to myself before replying to others.
Glad to hear of your friend (who is about my age) and his preference to keep things simple. I think he is in the majority of the North American population and we here at CTH have become used to Sundance’s attention to detail and how such details are often the key to solving what are otherwise obscure puzzles for the mainstream population who are busy dealing with their daily lives.
Cheers right back at ya’!
Thank you!
I was with him again an hour or two ago…you should have heard him go off about our Provincial government and our Canadian health care system…
Cheers!
I can imagine! THAT affects him personally, so it’s not a’too deep”a topic about which he can form an opinion. He is probably pretty representative of the average hard working and older retired people in both countries here.
Amen, Charles Tate.
Thank you for ‘putting the brakes’ on the spiral down into doubt, suspicion, and accusation in the conversation here.
Human beings have a tendency to want to apply their own standards of perfection to other humans, and when those standards aren’t met dissension, doubt, and division ensue.
Just what the devil wants!
In the context of 5th generation informational warfare, there is only one person I completely trust and am completely committed to-PDJT. For everyone else, it’s trust but verify.
SD uses the term Comrade/Comrades to describe you, me, all of us, quite often. It is used in the headline of a lot of articles.
Comrade Dissidents is another term he places in there, a lot.
You must be new around here.
“…new around here.”
Priceless
You use snark, but dont answer the question.
Interesting.
Not that I disagree with your post or anything.
Been on site 4-6 years, commenting 1-3, can’t remember exactly.
“Interesting use of the word “comrade” by Sundance referring to Tucker. Coincidence? Subliminal message? Freudian slip?”
Again, I fail to understand your message here. Truly, its a tad bewildering.
Again, is this the first time you have seen this use of the word here? You can actually avoid me thinking you are a smart ass, by simply responding, respectfully.
We are on the same team and same mind.
No, my take is:
When Sundance uses “Comrade Dissidents” he is being facetious in a good way with his followers. In a totalitarian regime, you cannot be a comrade and a dissident. I think that is funny.
When I see him use “Comrade” I’m not so sure. Could be means the same as above, or dropping a hint, or a subconscious revelation. But typically, comrade (standing alone) represents a loyal follower of the State.
Since I believe that Tucker is a deep state asset, the use of comrade seems apropos.
Exactly, Bobo.
When Sundance refers to someone as a comrade, he is expressing the communist utopia the globalists are constructing for us, and how we all will be expected to think and talk when their plan is achieved.
Bobo, Black Knight is a long time Treeper and has been here longer than I. … and I’ve been here since late 2016….
Tucker isn’t “working”. He’s just talking.
His current format seems to be heavily influenced by Russell Brand’s monologue format.
Rumble does post Tucker’s episodes.
So far, so does YouTube, surprisingly.
Using your premise that this was just a Tucker monologue on “dictatorial style of governing,” then exactly why did Tucker even throw that statement in there about only one opposes the Ukraine war?
Without naming ‘him.’
Easy. To demonstrate how small that group is (of political leaders) and to show that the only person in the upper political hierarchy that does oppose the war is being (unconstitutionally) threatened with dictatorial actions. Tucker’s focus is on the perpetrators, NOT the victim(s) in this particular monologue.
Robert Kennedy Jr. is also opposed to the war in Ukraine, so that’s two candidates
And coincidentally both DeSantis and RFK elevated themselves out of obscurity by being not just “opposed” to COVID lockdowns but their opposition to it loudly proclaimed by the media.
While DeSantis pretends to support other conservative causes (though his actual voting record doesn’t support it), RFK doesn’t bother to hide his affinity to climate change and other obvious anti-democratic causes.
Oh how cute! Trump gets radio silence, but two non-conservative candidates get highlighted to help split the vote against He Whose Name Must Not Be Spoken to give Newsome his best chance.
They are good at splitter strategy. Very good indeed.
Speaking of nuance….I’ve been musing about this and it occurs to me that previously, before either of DeSantis or RFK were anywhere near being thought of as presidential candidates, there were two events that caused me to wonder.
First was the very obvious Jackie-O/JFK-like picture of DeSantis and his family.
The second was the very professional but radical too-cool-for-school anti-vaccine video promoted by RFK.
They plan their chess moves waaay in advance.
the very obvious Jackie-O/JFK-like picture of DeSantis and his family
When I see Casey DeSantis I see Eva Peron.
The day she trotted out the long, white prom gloves I about fell over.
They used to be more than prom gloves. I remember my parents, aunts, and grandmother wearing them to go to dinner in a restaurant.
Back in the day – when women had class. I’m old enough to remember and to actually have worn gloves and hats. Women have lost a lot in the last 60 years. IMHO
Amen. The feminists told em it’s cool to be more like men. Naturally they fell for it. One more reason to repeal the 14th Amendment.
it was like something I would have seen at cotillion in the 6th grade.
Cotillion!
There’s a word we rarely use or see anymore.
My auto spell check did not recognize it, and kept changing it on me as I typed here.
And the bouffant hair!
In my opinion, Casey and her stylist(s) are attempting to latch Casey onto Jackie’s wagon of tasteful elegance and huge popularity…but they are falling short. Reason: imitation and costuming do not impress or re-create.
Casey should be her own person. She is an attractive and smiley mother of beautiful young children. She is a cancer survivor. These things are far away and enough to draw folks to her.
To me she looks and acts like a Mafia Princess.
I was thinking mafia wife but you are exactly right. And she seems like she is trying to fake the class she is lacking.
Maybe both.
“Don’t cry for me Port St Lucie”
That made me laugh.
Funny, me too. But closer to home, I when I see Casey on stage I am reminded of Hilary Clinton.
RFK has a long track record of his causes going back decades. I don’t think he’s playing chess. He’s simply an old fashioned liberal Democrat without the woke component. Depending on your age, think Tip O’Neil type democrat.
DeSanctimonious, tho, he’s not playing chess either. He’s just performing as his puppet masters want him to.
I agree with your assessment. Especially regarding RFK.
Yes.
RE: RFK, jr — Until he renounces the Democrat/Communist Party, the party which left Reagan 40+ years ago (“I didn’t leave it, it left me”) I’m skeptical about everything he says.
Everything.
In fact, Circlin, think of his dad, Bobby. I agreed with a lot of what Bobby Kennedy said back in the day. And his brother Ted admitted years after his assassination that if Bobby had lived longer, he would have been considered a conservative by later standards.
RFK Jr. has said that he can’t discuss many topics (like covid or vaccines) with his liberal friends anymore, because they are completely closed to any digression from current liberal orthodoxy, and it blows his mind…
I was 11 when RFK was assassinated. I know my family didn’t like him because of the reported mob connections.
Doesn’t it make you wonder how people like RFK stay a democrat? They have nothing, and I mean nothing, in common with todays Dem party but tradition and family ties keep them there. Just stupid imo. Why tie yourself to a party, and not your country?
I know… I feel the same way about Alan Dershowitz, who is another classic liberal who has gone against his own party to defend Trump, free speech, and other issues. And yet… he still votes Hillary and Biden. Go figure.
I was impressed by RFK’s stance on Covid. I think he may be speaking truth on childhood vaccines.
But then I actually saw him, on video from 2014, making this statement about climate deniers:
“Do I think they should be in jail — I think they should be enduring three hots and a cot at the Hague with all the other war criminals.”
Perhaps he has learned a few things recently. If not, then he would sell us all to one world green government.
Keep your eyes and ears open.
I agree. I could never vote for him for exactly that reason. Ever. Deep in the Dem psyche is a totalitarian waiting to emerge.
I can, however, appreciate the clarity and attention he brings to the vaxxine industry.
President Trump can name Kennedy the surgeon general. Just because Kennedy excels at throwing sunlight onto Big Harma, it doesn’t mean he should be President.
Koronakampf (corona struggle)
How’s the WHO lockdown treaty coming along?
Never Back Frowns
“Mitch McConnell had advised me, correctly, that Fauci would be a valuable member of the team because of his stature.”
— Mike Pence, So Help Me God
exitthewho.com
Nice catch!
…and Melania Trump’s stunning outfit on inauguration day definitely harkened back to Jackie Kennedy. It’s a natural thing to do since Jackie is the archetype of first lady class.
Just a fact – RFK has been anti vaxxine for years. Ever hear of the Children,s Health Defense organization? Established 2011.
Never Back Downers
1 min
Being ‘Anti-Woke’ Isn’t Enough for the 2024 GOP Nomination
https://rumble.com/v2vslk6-raheem-kassam-being-anti-woke-isnt-enough-for-the-2024-gop-nomination.html
Meagan, you probably are too young to remember that in the last century there was such person as a conservative Democrat.
Sure, those who were CDs then did not check all of the boxes of conservatives now, but they did check off many, and also exhibited independent thought.
In my assessment, RFK Jr. and Vivek both check off many conservative boxes, and also exhibit independent thought.
If a person is a committed Trump-voter (which I am), it does not mean that person has to trash and/or disrespect every competitor.
Thank you for that.
And Vivek Ramaswamy.
Shh. lol
30 sec
https://rumble.com/v2wolii-vivek-ramaswamy-i-like-that-guy.html
Rama-dama-ding-dong has stated he has no interest in a VP spot with Trump or in a cabinet position with Trump. Why not if he thinks Trump is greatest president ever? Another hand picked Yale lawyer decepticon brought to you by Paul and Daisy Soros.
Tthe very stable genius has done his homework. “I like this guy” indeed.
Vivek is a team Trump stalking horse.
While he may have some good ideas…I don’t think hes a natural born citizen.
He’s also a WEF young global leader. So was Ivanka, and how did we all like that?
Tucker received his talking points and Kennedy is not considered a candidate. Can’t say Trump on Fox or on Twitter.
If the election was held tomorrow and it was RFK vs Biden, RFK would win.
Don’t count on it. In 2016, the Democratic primary election winner was Sanders, but true to their democratic values, the democrats ignored the will of their followers and installed Hillary as the anointed one using a democratic process known as super-delegates (or people whose votes count more than the peasants).
Cue Animal Farm.
We should be open to a Trump/RFK unity ticket if it gets Trump back into the white house.
Even if they win in their Primaries, both Trump & RKFJr may be denied the legitimate position of being their party candidates for 2024 because of the corruption/fraud in both parties. If they teamed up to form a 3rd Party, this would deliver a knock-out punch to the UniParty that would be hard to beat with election fraud. IMO a lot of people are unhappy with both the Democrats & the GOP and would join a 3rd Party to vote against the crime syndicate running DC. To counter the power of this movement, the election fraud would have to be enormous to be effective & it would be easy to prove.
My dream.
Yeah RFK would win ….until enough mail in ballots from Philly, Atlanta, Detroit, Vegas, and Milwaukee appeared in the night and gave Biden the win.
Agree if we had fair and honest elections.
Only if fraud had been conquered.
I guess Trump could post on Twitter if he still wanted to. He prefers to stay with truth Social. I think we need to quit savaging our own and exaggerating things beyond what the actual truth is. Tucker also did not mention Ron DeSantis ot Tim Scott.
As far as Tucker goes, his message is not about picking and choosing candidates. It is an overall picture of what is going on and it is up to you to do your homework and decide who you support.
Right on, debbie.lynne.
Thank you.
“…we need to quit savaging our own and exaggerating things beyond what the actual truth is.”
See episode 6:
“Bobby Kennedy is winning”
Will Bobby K be inundated with indictments, too?
I did not know that.
So is Ramaswami. So three candidates. Tucker may have lost some of his fact checkers when he left Fox.
I dont think TC is balancing anything to hold his stint on Twitter. Musk is a businessman, Musk is the one doing a balancing act. Musk needs TC more than TC needs Twitter.
Ok come on guys, Tucker had a whole episode (3) about Trump where he mentioned his name many times. And he specifically mentioned that Trump was being targeted for his opposition to the endless wars. So it’s pretty obvious who he’s referring to. Reading way too much into every word..
A voice of reason
TC makes his views think. TC so far has been a consummate journalist. TC didn’t kiss Murdoch’s 20 million ring, he’s certainly not kissing Musk’s ass.
Tucker has already said that he will leave Twitter, if they start telling him what to say like Fox did.
I chuckled when he avoided Trump’s name. Not because I thought he was told to never mention Trump, but because he doesn’t have to and EVERYONE knows who he is talking about.
That is why they put together an indictment with 400 years in prison over “documents”.
Sorry, this means that when the chips are down he will give up. In the end run he will be contained. Details give this away.
The chips are down now. He doesn’t look like he is running away.
If he did turn tail, everyone would know TPTB found a large enough threat to force him to do a struggle session confession and would perceive it exactly for what it was.
Seriously? That’s what you got from that monologue?
I believe Tucker is trying to stay away from candidate endorsement. It is quite obvious to most that Trump IS the only candidate wanting to end this war.
Trump needs to talk about that himself and make certain that his stance is understood by voters.
Y’all do know that Tucker has already mentioned Trump’s name in previous monologues, right?
Tucker also realizing that some statements have far more impact when YOU fill in the blanks. Tucker is a shrewd man.
There it is! ^^^
Today’s touch of humor!
I watched the video before I read what Sundance pointed out. I “heard” Trump in that statement. I don’t think Trump’s name needed to be mentioned — there is only one and everyone knows it already. I could show that segment to anyone and ask them “who is he talking about there?” and the answer would be mostly unanimous… completely unanimous if I asked “Do you think he was referring to Trump?”
I’m not going to dismiss this sleight. I think it’s likely true that he wasn’t allowed (or discouraged) to mention Trump. But Carlson will say what he wants to say no matter what. And he said it. We all heard Trump even if he didn’t say it. And other people inclined to listen to Carlson did too.
This increasingly says more about Elon Musk whose mission appears to be win the majority of the public (the left is NOT a majority and the majority are coming to accept it with every example… look at Target and ABI (Bud Lite) (but why not Chick-fil-A?)) in order to steer that majority politically. He has accomplished a lot by offering up a “limited hangout” about the nature of government control and censorship. “Aha! They finally get it!” but then doesn’t quite deliver on things and even gets into bed with the DEI agenda. If Musk is opposed to such things, I saw no signs of a struggle.
And speaking of struggle! How about that cage match between Zuckerberg and Musk? Not going to lie — I will probably watch that. I don’t care who loses though. Just want to see someone doing things to either one of them I wish I could do myself.
DEI:(pronounced [da’-ee]) abbr: Divergence, Exclusion and Ignition meaning to separate or segregate people, exile the unwanted and to generally burn down society.
Western Communism is worse than it’s forefather.
It has metastasized.
Ha. Great. Had not seen that before. Try being ANYTHING in a communist country could be next, I guess.
The Eastern branch of communism killed over 100 million people. We’re still racking up the body count for Western communism, but it’s not at that level … yet.
Yet, indeed: https://sukwan.substack.com/p/radiation-and-resonance?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
By “Eastern,” does that mean “Far East” China? Mao alone racked up c. 100 million victims: Stalin’s body count by some estimates was not far away, so yes, close to 200 million.
No matter: ONE DEATH because of Communism is one too many!
Consider our new Dr. Mengele, Fauci, and his body count in the last years from The Wuhan Flu!
100 million is just in Russia. Add Mao and Pol Pot.
60 million abortions in the US since Rowe v Wade.
Anyone who seems to good to be true is just that. Thought that from the first time even the papers would mention DeSaintly’s good work. Yuck!!!
That includes both Elon and Tucker
I agree. Elon is a huge welfare king and Tucker is from a deep state family. I find qualities in both that are genuinely appealing. However, both are so intertwined with the deep state that I am not a cheerleader nor a believer that they have everyday people’s best interests in mind.
I have decided everything is an operation until proven otherwise.
Wise you are.
President Donald J. Trump, the ONLY opponent to our involvement in Ukraine among the candidates . . .
but NOT the ONLY opponent!
There surely must be millions of people opposed to American involvement in this manufactured war in Ukraine, who object to the billions of dollars of American taxpayer money being sent to Ukraine and most definitely opposed to sending our young people to fight there!
suejeanne: “among the candidates”……. did you miss that? There ARE a lot of ‘candidates’, but not millions.
That neat Hollywood Squares Super Sized that Sundance has up there of the various “GOP” candidates, I mean that bunch, if I understand correctly, are all OK with Ukraine, except for Donald Trump . . . and then, although he is “the odd man out” of that bunch, there are millions of us who agree with him on Ukraine.
Yeah I didn’t buy that 75% think it’s imperative for us to win and 59% think we need to send weapons to Ukraine. 6 out of 10? There’s no way bc almost every voter who is conservative, independent, or libertarian is against the war.
I forget who did the recent AI video damning Biden announcing that he was instituting the draft. In it he said he would start by calling up the 20 year olds and move on from there. Art imitating life and scaring the heck out of the young. Are they getting the message?!! He is a warmonger and a criminal.
I sure would NOT want my kids drafted. Who in their right mind would want their kids Dying in they’re useless and made up wars? “ We will send your kids to war so we can make more money”.
That would be one way to ensure their downfall. they make our military woke and no one wants to join to fight their silly wars so introduced the draft again. They must not remember what happened during Vietnam.Go for it! It would keep us from having to fight them here at home.
Posobiec
Jack Posobiec. I felt that was a very dangerous thing to do.
They are really pushing. At some point there is a push too far. I think that already happened. BUT. We have a society of complience. Why do you think that a lot of the government employees go along, the three letter agency employees, even if they are good people, they are complient, and so far in debt, they cannot resist.
AM I hopefull for the future? This I believe is the last chance. The previous experiments with socialism and communism did not have the controls that we have now with the internet and the media.
Pray.
Keep your powder dry.
2020 and 2023 were touted as last chances and the Republicans let it slip away. The left knows it is better to act and then ask for forgiveness or it is just late it is over move on. Republicans seem to think someone else will stand for them.
Or Republicans are in on it. Recall that the Republicrats did nothing to stop the steal in 2020 and 2022.
That’s right! We saw it happen in NY where Lee Zeldin actually won the governor’s race.
Yet somehow he refused to challenge the results as many urged him to do.
Repubs don’t want election integrity.
Look at Adam Laxalt in NV…22…ran for US senator.
Lost by less than 400 votes out of over 3 million cast.
He didn’t contest…just walked away.
Now he’s out, loud & supporting DeFraud.
They were “buddies” at one of the Ivy colleges…and Adam is from old money in NV.
DeFraud is trying his hardest to join the multi millionaires club of good ole boys in the Repub party. DeFraud thinks he’s going to start a new political dynasty with that lil family of his.
MAGA will relegate St Ron & his loud, shrill, social climbing wife back to Florida!!!
Yeah ron! “won” with “massive support in the State”(*notice he didn’t say an overwhelming majority of votes*) and Kari “lost”.
Ron “won” like Lindsey and China Mitch. Funny how that vote counting software benefits RINOs
Establishment Republicans actively assisted in stealing the election from President Trump and everyone of us who voted for him.
In 22, AZ GOPe, in broad daylight stole the election from Kari Lake, Abe Hamadeh, Mark Finchem & I suspect from Blake McMasters too.
The only way to fix things is to first burn the Republican party to the ground. Force the fake conservatives to declare themselves as the fascist Dims they are.
Sins of omission are as evil -and deadly- as sins of commission. The UNiparty wings, working in tandem, perfectly illustrate this concept.
Humanity will therefore be humbled before God until we change our evil ways. “Pretending not to know things” just won’t cut it.
There is no last chance man – just look at the whiskey rebellion. Washington taxed the little distilleries knowing they’d go out of business and what did he do when they rebelled? Rounded them up and executed them. Real American history. It’s always been an elitist empire, democracy is just some disingenuous bread crumbs we were thrown as an afterthought.
Oh and I forgot to mention the end to that history – Washington himself became the biggest distiller in the nation as a result of him suiting up with his 13k troops to put down the rebellion.
Masons gonna Mason.
https://www.britannica.com/event/Whiskey-Rebellion
Unless this article is completely made up, it appears that only two whisky rebels were put on trial. Both were pardoned by President Washington.
Nice Post!
The debt trap is IMO maybe the most powerful compliance tool.
Up this way ( Greater Vancouver B.C.) one would think everything is “ peachy “ luxury cars abound, luxury houses and high end condos rise all around us.
Is it crime profits, inherited wealth, largely because of massive increases in property values over the last few decades.
Or is it a combination of both, with the “gasoline “ being “cheap” money.
We knew of folks buying expensive “ dirt” with variable rate mortgages at under 1%.
Some of the wiser ones locked in 5 year fixed at 1.5% or a fraction more.
Many of the same had car loans at 0%😟
Those days of a few years ago are long gone.
We’ll see but a real financial depression is a distinct possibility.
Cheers!
Feinstein is forced to retire. Kamala says her heart was always in the Senate, so she resigns and is appointed to the Senate. Newsom is nominated to be VP. Biden resigns for “health reasons,” on the promise that Newsom will pardon Biden, Hunter and Joe.
And who will nooseum’s vp?
Moocheele obama?
😳
PLEASE, GOD……NOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!
If Harris complies!!
She wants that ring!! To be honest I think she knows what a disappointment she is to her Daddy. Maybe if she becomes President Daddy will love her.
She’s President of the Senate. What more does she want?
At this point, Harris wants obscurity. Her entire staff has left her for a reason.
They are having to move faster than they wanted. Biden is in deep decline.
Oh, and do not forget Jill. She has more legs to show off and special treatment to take.
Not to mention that Jill has more shower curtains then Imelda Marcus had shoes.
It’s always so obvious now, thanks to Sundance. If you pay attention to news blurbs that are noticeably coordinated..the latest is how terribly unpopular Kamala is. The fix is in for her. She’s toast…she would gladly take her old job back in the Senate.
Couple that with, finally, the Joe/Hunter bribery scandal that HAS BEEN KNOWN for over 6 Years! And you see how they plan to get rid of them both. It has to be done before too long, but first they have to make sure to demolish Trump. Newsome has to be the guy. They need someone like Joe, just younger. Cant let RFK in there and upset control of the real power (O).
Timing is crucial.
Consider that RFK Jr. Is being set up as the feel good “solution ” to the Hegelian dialectic.
Don’t fall for it. If you watch the information war map with that in mind, you do see it lining up.
Once improbable, now very possible. We live in a strange time.
I agree————but (assuming DJTrump is “allowed” to run)——–I fear an excuse to declare “martial law” and declaring no national election in 2024!!!!!
Like Ukraine?
Everyone leaves Schiff out of this scenario. He wants the Senate seat, and as the (former) intel committee head, he’s got the goods on all these wannabees.
Was this why BHO was in the White House today?
Is he asking / telling Joe to step down?
Are there publicly available visitor logs for Camp David?
Only for specific “members of the public”.
He leave the H out and we got BO.
THE “H” IS FOR OBAMA’S MIDDLE NAME. BHO (BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA)
There is a joke in that….did you miss it?
Also, his actual middle name is “Marshall”.
I’d like to be a fly on the wall for that conversation.
“Time to go, Joe”. “ We will make sure you and your deadbeat son don’t go to prison, but you will be leaving soon”.
Easier told than obeyed.
I don’t think Newsom will be impressive on the big stage. He has not helped California.
Last year he got his booster and was out of public for a couple of weeks. Some said he had a reaction and got “Bells Palsey” from the shot.
https://www.usatoday.com/videos/news/nation/2021/10/27/california-gov-newsom-gets-vaccine-booster-shot/8572095002/
The Democrats could run herpes for President and win!
Any D on a glass will do.
They already did-obummer!
Impressive? Hahahahaha. He has all the prerequisites needed. Looks good…can make a sentence. Although scratch that last one. Fetterman proves that one.
The “Haircut” looking for a brain is the master of obfuscating a subject and moving on to the next unmeaningful matter. He will wow all listener’s with those “slick” (as in oily) words as he is so capable of uttering…
Then Gavin is really a fool.
All of the elites have taken saline shots…they know the vax is dangerous.
Yes, whoever gave him the shot did not get the memo. Gavin also has not done a thing about the homeless problem in this state, or in San Fran when he was mayor there. Really, a horrible spoiled brat, part of the four big California political families now ruining this beautiful state.
California is dominated by crazy leftists. Gavin has never had to consider a conservative policy or face political opposition. Not once, in his political career has he been challenged. He is weak.
Personally I hope RFKjr gives him a whupping.
Ash Carter didn’t.
Tucker came right out and said Biden acts like a man who knows he can’t lose…because he can’t…because the democrats already have fixed the vote.
Truth.
Exactly! The Republicans could run George Washington and get 90 Million votes. The ballot count would stop for a few hours and Biden would get 91 Million votes! LOL
“Your country has electronic voting machines” has unexpectedly low hits!
As I keep saying, if they are willing to be this overt in unjustly going after Trump, they sure as heck are not going to let him be President again. No matter how evidentially obvious it might prove to be, they will have this election rigged in enough states to prevent Trump from getting the necessary number of electoral college votes.
BINGO!
I believe we get a say, and I don’t just mean by voting.
…or dropping a bio-weapon so blue-state governors could change voting laws for the “emergency.”
Tucker said, “they have machines”… a direct hit at Dominion & Faux.
Sundance.. perhaps by NOT mentioning the name, he gets people to question the “who” in their minds???
When Tucker mentioned the one candidate, I said “Trump” out loud. So did my wife.
Perhaps Tucker, by NOT mentioning Pres. Trump by name, he minimizes the partisan accusations that would distract from his message.
I am not sure if he is for PDJT or against him, but I greatly appreciate his message about our current condition.
I watch Newsmax and they have ex-FOX head Greta on at 6 pm. She obviously does not like Trump because FOX fired her for supporting him, so I watch something else. There are lots in the media like her.
Unfortunately, too many Bob.
I think Greta left Fox long before Trump came on the scene.
Greta announced on September 6, 2016, that she was not going to seek another contract. That was just 2 months before Trump won. It is also my birthday
Maybe…or Tucker knows if you say anything good about Trump, he will get tuned out from many on both sides. Better to have the truth about Ukraine and how corrupt our country has become, before jumping into who can save us.
“or Tucker knows if you say anything good about Trump, he will get tuned out from many on both sides.”
If that is Tucker’s fear, then he is not worth listening to.
Cleaning out the litter box is preferable to wasting your time hoping to get your ears tickled with another form of “tic-tok”.
Good point.
“Trump” is a trigger word for the brainwashed, just like the red hats can visually set them off.
We’ve all seen it in action. The meltdowns vary in range, but it’s all emotion & the ability to process new info to the contrary does NOT compute.
They’re too dumb to recognize the conditioning & that they’ve essentially been hypnotized.
My ex made an interesting observation back in 2016… he noted on CNN/MSNBC there’d consistently be somewhere on the screen banners, “Trump [with some negative connotation unrelated to the story]”. Meanwhile the big head on the screen is telling them what to think.
We really need to wear our MAGA hats in public just to trigger the left.
When Tucker leaves Twit, until than I have no use for him. He kissed Glenn Becks A** when employed there,Musk is just another one to kiss.
Right on, DanQ.
A puppet for the people. He will tell you what you want to hear, as with all republicans not a g.d. thing will happen. Tucker will cash in on his mouth. Its about the money for all these wannabe talking heads.
Pathetic.
He is red-pilling people every day. Personally, I am not looking for a saint. I appreciate the message.
“…omission datapoint nonetheless…”
No, I think he’s challenging his audience to really think/remember where the differences between candidates remain.
I don’t see it as a slap against a stalwart Trump.
I think bringing Trump into it would have taken away from the point he was making
He has never liked to appear as partisan.
By not saying his name, he makes it even more noticeable.
Ex
Exactly!
No. Saying Trump’s name gives him power. So why would TC not say it? Same thing DeSorry@$$ did. I am tired of all the talk anyway, it’s still sheep talk, “we need better people running us”. We have more power than we know, when will people wake up up & start using it? The Getty family runs Newsom. And we still don’t know where Ground Zero is, really, I mean are the billionaires even at the top? Three billionaires with Deep connections just drowned, and a fourth, connected to General Dynamics & a former director at JP Morgan, just died in a car crash, James Crown, real name Krinsky, you can read about him but he is basically a Chicago mobster, family goes way back. His plan was to take over Chicago & stop the lawlessness. So, who is taking out the billionaires? Think about how bad things must be on the other side for this stuff to be happening.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12235511/Billionaire-James-Crown-vowed-make-Chicago-safest-city-America-dies.html
on James Crown: https://unlimitedhangout.com/2023/04/investigative-series/crowning-the-king-of-wall-street/
Nancy Pelosie’s nephew for president. That has a kind of Tolkien Ring of Power doesn’t it!
“Who is taking out the billionaires?”
A question worth considering.
Bye Mr. Krinsky.
When indeed talking about candidates.
I didn’t see it, he mentioned trump thru implication. Everyone – every single person watching – knew who he implied. I don’t think it was necessary to say trumps name as it seemed more like he was trying to keep the focus on his topic and trump is inarguably a diversion that conjures up a distracting emotional response. Further, by stating that there was only one person opposed, he highlights that de santis is pro Ukraine too, and every other person running for that matter. Idk I just don’t see intent to downplay trump, but rather intent to highlight as an existential warning that only one person out of a dozen running for president is against this “war for democracy.”
I seriously doubt twitter has any say whatsoever on what Carlson can talk about – he said he would leave immediately if that were the case.
He clearly said he’s the one they all want locked up. We all know who that is.
Trump.
Kudos to Tucker for mentioning Gonzalo Lira and the fact that the Biden administration is letting him rot in jail in Ukraine. I guess because he is not a lesbian basketball player, they just do not care. As I understand it though, it is the obligation of the U.Ss Embassy to represent all American citizens – not just Democrats.
Slight correction: a lesbian basketball player with a penis.
That’s exactly the reason Biden let Russia have Viktor Bout (aka Merchant of Death) – it was that or Russia would expose that transvestite’s wiener…
I think they may have released him to work the Priggy deal for the CIA. They were seen together right before the Wagner “rebellion.” Sort of like Germany putting Lenin on the train to Russia.
Except the double agent either got tagged or triple crossed.
Anybody seen him alive this last week?
Just tp provide an alternative viewpoint to the Leftist, Pro-WEF hit pieces (e.g., Daily Beast) on Gonzalo Lira, here is a counter-point:
“While it is true that Lira has criticised the Zelensky regime and the eight-year-long shelling of Donbas residents by Kyiv, he has not participated in any activities other than exercising his right to free speech as a citizen and respected journalist. Whether or not we agree with Lira’s opinions, freedom of speech must not be restricted, especially during times of conflict. These are the values we claim to be defending.
Ukraine’s recent implementation of laws criminalising dissent, banning opposition political parties, nationalising the media, and even persecuting the Ukrainian Orthodox Church for maintaining canonical communion with Moscow has raised concerns among free speech advocates. These actions have been criticised for undermining democratic values and creating a chilling effect on freedom of expression.”
https://www.helsinkitimes.fi/world-int/23512-detaining-gonzalo-lira-another-blow-to-the-freedom-of-press-in-ukraine.html
Many years ago I heard about this great car salesman, Zig Ziglar. He could sell you a car–a convertible, in winter with the top down in Alaska during a blizzard, while the vehicle’s air conditioning system was going full blast. Want to put pressure on the couple sitting across from your desk as you “closed the deal” on that car? Simple, just cut the front legs of the chairs they are sitting on so that they lean forward…they will feel uncomfortable just enough to want to get out of there-they will make the deal and it’s over! He later went on to become a motivational speaker, so I heard.
Years earlier a girlfriend would say “flattery will get you everything!” You bet she really seduced the heck out of me; it took time before I realized the trap I was in via her use of language. Reading Tacitus gave me serious insights into what flattery can produce, that is why some years back when I saw and heard Gavin Newsom on television I stepped back and thought “this guy is really dangerous, just like Obama in his use of language” where the listener gets truly duped.
At that time he was divorced from a woman named Kimberly Guilfoyle who was working for Fox in news where she was dressed to the nines with heavy makeup, etc., as a sex bomb (in my opinion, but not my type at all). She is now locked in a relationship with one of the Trump sons if the news reports are accurate.
Symbolism over substance…such lives deeply within the world of flattery, does it not? What is a “con man” if not someone who sells you confidence when in fact the game is to control you for their benefit, not yours. Recall when Covid was at it’s peak Newsom was found to be eating a very, very expensive dinner with no masks in a private setting…but you were told to do the opposite. “Do as I say, not as I do!”
The dumb electorate, the suckers, the wimps…the uneducated are necessary stones and barbs these wanna be dictators must trample over to get where they want to go. They seek your permission via our voting system which they have also rigged as best they can.
It’s the old game of “the haves versus the have nots” or am I wrong? Who has adjusted to this inflation the fastest? Certainly not the “have nots” as I see it.
Gavin Newsom is the white Obama, nothing more, nothing less…just a guy with a silver tongue who really is the devil because he is a malignant narcissist. Tucker has him nailed, that’s for sure!
Look out America, he is coming for your votes…just like Obama but worse, he be the white devil you feared in your nightmares!
Unlike Obama, he’s a white man. He cannot command the black vote as Obama did, nor the white guilt vote.
I hear half of CA residents want to leave. Not sure what mix of conservatives and lefties that is, but it’s not a good look for an election / installation effort when your voters leave you rather than suffer under you.
Not half but 40% do and that there will defeat Newsome. The reason they do not move is the weather and the fact that they have too many possessions stuffing their homes and moving would be a huge undertaking. It is not like the illegals who can stuff all their possessions in a backpack or they would have left years ago.
“if the news reports are accurate”
“When we think of cheese, it’s Wisconsin; when we speak of oil, it’s Pennsylvania; but with grifters, it’s Indiana. Many a first-rate con man has hailed from that state, and many, many more second- and third-raters…
“Con men look puzzled and scratch their heads when you ask them why this should be so.
“A former insideman for the Wonder says, “I don’t know why, but the state of Indiana is out in front in turning out grifters of all kinds. At one time you could go to almost any county fair and some farmer would take you aside and show you some new kind of flat-joint [crooked gambling device] that he had invented.”
–The Big Con (1940)
Newsom Hides Ties to Silicon Valley Bank
https://rumble.com/v2df8oa-newsom-hides-ties-to-silicon-valley-bank-and-live-with-dave-rubin-and-steve.html
Pence hails from Indians and must have been the product of grifters on both sides of his family tree
Brilliant!
Thank you for the post!
👍👍
Cheers!
Their problem..BIG problem is RFK jr. He has a lot of support among moderate registered Democrats. If he joins Trump’s ticket or runs third party when the DNC rejects him AND THEY WILL. He can pull a huge “Ross Perot” on them and even voter fraud won’t overcome it.
Or he will be like Bernie and meekly throw his support behind the people who just screwed him.
Married to Cheryl Hines. Never forget it.
…do you mean jr supporting dems,
like the way his record (actions) proves he has voted for decades (straight demogery ) – which actively contributed and supported past and current events ?
hmmm…
Actions, speak louder than words.
(so, be careful of the wooden-nickel, campaign rhetoric )
imho
🤣🤣 at the mental gymnastics required to believe Tucker refusing to say Donald Trump, is a way to get people to choose to compare the candidates.
Tucker is going to do the same bullshit con at Twitter he did at Fox.
Here is another example of authoritarianism and Tuckers reaction:
OMG thanks! I had no idea Tucker had done a segment with Hicckock45!!! 😀
All the dirt on California.
Tweets by CA_Insider
Shall we set up a pool as to when or if he comes out for DeSantis?
When old people start to slide, they slide fast.
Biden is 80, but he’s an old 80. My grandmother was not an old 80. In fact, she lived to be 98, and she had all her faculties. But Biden has dementia, and dementia is that slide of old age.
I know a little about this because an 80-something member in our family has dementia. It was diagnosed several years ago. His dementia was ‘stabilized’ with meds and a predictable daily routine. Then he had to have minor surgery and the slide began. Little things can trigger the slide. There are good days when he seems like himself and bad days when nothing makes sense to him. Because of dementia, our loved one is an old 80.
Cocker never had an original thought. He got the outline for this from Sundance.
BBTDVB.
The big question these days is, “Does Tucker Carlson or any other public intellectual, pundit, commenter or influencer report anything that isn’t already known?” No they do not. At this point, the overarching thrusts of news and propaganda in the U.S.A. are nothing but a constant drumbeat of variations on the godawful themes of corruption\perversion\depravity. By now the whole world knows the entire FEDGOV bureaucracy and those who lead it are laughably, pitifully, ridiculously corrupt. The crews of Joe Biden & Obama are the terror-clowns leading the corruption. Such wicked folk will not\cannot redress or reform themselves. Being massaged with innumerable reports about how really, really bad the corruption is is an exercise in self-induced distraction. To my shame, I’m as guilty of this pointless exercise as anyone else. I’m gonna break this bad habit.
When Sundance speaks, I listen. When Sundance calls Tucker “Comrade Tucker” is it time to say the Twitter worm has turned?
On Tucker: How jolly he seems with his new Twitter memes.
The gullible can always be culled at the appropriate time by the power hungry and and those with no true religion but the religion of lies and half truths.
“He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named” 🙄
Only reaffirms who He is. 😏
Childish.
If the fix is in for another presidential installation, then the entire DiSantis Trump show is just that, but it does entertain the citizens and keep us hoping and spending our time on social media instead of filling the streets in demand of change.
Profound statement.
I’m happy to hear Tucker finally mention voting machines. Voting machines are stealing elections and the world. Nobody else is allowed to mention voting machines. However, a comedian named Jimmy Dore, this week, did more honest reporting on voting machines than all the conservative clowns. Try mentioning algorithms on Bannons show. He has convulsions. Voting machines are stealing the world.
Frankly speaking,
the $election topic ( plus remedy ) and many more topics are openly mentioned every Sunday through Saturday, all week, for weeks on:
https;//frankspeech.com
Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.
Unfortunately in this crazy world we live in today nobody trusts anyone.
This sounds like how the Soviet Union was how everyone constantly looked over their shoulder.
Communism will do that to people.
Gavin Newsom has caused 4 out of 10 Californians to want to leave California. Projected that would be 132 million of 330 million US Citizens. No president has got that many votes.
Bravo, Tucker! A spade is a spade!
RFK, Jr has been more direct in his opposition to the Ukraine war.
So TC is wrong when he says only 1 candidate is opposed?
Wouldn’t read too much into not mentioning Trump by name.
So, does Susan Rice run ?
gavin newsom / susan rice.Wish their names would never be mentioned again…..EVER!
Add
Obamato that.Gavin Newsom, on is own, would never play nationally. His oily slickster greaseball persona only works in California.
Really ? We sit here this morning with Biden and Harris as our “leaders”.
Joe was wildly popular! 81 million people voted for him.
Uh oh. He brought up electronic voting machines and vote fraud. Rupert’s gonna have a cow.
When he was a Fox, they had some editorial control.
The Government Party is getting increasingly desperate. They need to keep a lid on voter fraud. The problem is all this stuff coming out: the Russia hoax, the Biden laptop cover up, the J6 FBInsurrection, etc. Calling their enemies paranoid conspiracy nuts loses its punch when the conspiracy facts get made public.
The only election fraud that hasn’t been definitively proved is the vote rigging. But it doesn’t take a genius to spot it.
Democrats are beyond corrupt.
Only watched that 6.29 noted “non reference” – he said it while gulping air and you could hardly pick up this “Non reference “ to PDJT unless really listening closely as he quickly moved on – Thanks Sundance , all I need to know – not my up of tea – restating / repackaging obvious truths –
One thing if It is Newsome ( as PDJT has predicted, he doesn’t think Slo Joe will be nominee, didn’t say yet who he thinks it might be ) . The “all in voting” Spigots will be wide open…how to deal with it ?.Plus the efforts to preemptively derail PDJT from even being the nominee will be on overdrive …Otherwise , can’t think of Any other problems ( sarcasm) ..
Here’s how one rag reported on Tucker’s monologue last night:
Tucker Carlson launches scathing attack on Biden’s support for Ukraine in new Twitter show – and mocks ‘world’s foremost democracy advocate’ Zelensky for refusing to hold elections while country is at war
By HARRIET ALEXANDER
28 Jun 2023
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12241211/Carlson-mocks-worlds-foremost-democracy-advocate-Zelensky-attacks-Bidens-support-Ukraine.html
And the name Trump is not brought into it once.
Ladies and Gentlemen, THIS is why Tucker did not use President Trump’s name. This story was not about President Trump. It was about reality tv porn star turned war mongering dictator, Mr. Z.
Had he mentioned our President-in-Exile they would all make the story about him, not Mr. Z, the war mongering dictator.
Unlike so many others we have talked about here recently, Tucker does not need to invoke the name Trump to get attention, earn his living, or get up in the morning. He has his own brand, one name, and he has and is building it quite successfully.
The UK Daily mail? … I check it everyday for their anti -Trump stories, which are always there … they had 3 or 4 today in addition to the Tucker story – btw enough to just read the headlines , no need to read the actual stories – Anyway, good for Tucker, I guess
I really agree with him that the Dems do control the elections and they are not worried in the least about the outcome of future voting attempts. I once thought that the Biblical warning of building your house on sand (silicon chips) concerned an EMP that would take them out thereby crippling society, but now I realize its because it is so easy to control everything by relying on the computer for everything.
Interesting point. Very interesting.
Jesus told us all quite clearly what happens when you build your house upon the sand when the Storm comes.
May it be so.
Transgender is good for two votes per person.
One is male and one is female.
Both are democrats.
Treepers who are counting on Carlson are in for a gigantic disappointment.
Not mentioning Trump when referencing his position on the war that Carlson is supposedly railing against signals total sellout operation .
Suggestion Biden possibly a Traitor , my words not Carlson’s , I haven’t sold out yet, then saying usually prohibits a run for re-election is classic equivocation .
And the the fathers love crap.
How about Biden fathers love when showering with his twelve year old daughter.
Once again Typical FOX equivocal bullshit. SAD
I found the Abraham Lincoln statement Carlson made the most Disgusting of all.
After that I was through listening to this sophisticated propagandizing .
Carlson the well read brainiac knows that then Lincoln’s advisors suggested he suspend the election until the war was over he said “if we suspend this election in war time this country won’t be worth fighting for”.
How do I know this? Because we had that election and Lincoln won it.
To supposedly overlook what was one of the greatest political decisions in history, the first and only time a elected leader had the courage and wisdom NOT to suspend the wartime election and in essence preserving our Republic was too much for me.
Then as he went on to actually equate Lincoln with filth like Biden and Zelinsky Carlson sealed the deal for me.
My friends ,in my mind this was an unforgivable act.
Food for thought.
Not long ago Carlson said he seldom used the social media like twitter.
Does anyone really believe that.
A communications expert working remotely at home is not engaged online .
Sorry guys Carlson is not part of the problem . He is now the tip of the spear of the next generation of uniparty propaganda.
Let’s wait for perfection and have absolutely no platform in the meantime that reaches anyone but the choir.
The disinformation on Carlson’s platform has just begun.
What makes you think it is our platform?
Has Carlson ask any of us what we think while writing on his platform.
In essence MSNBC replaced CNN ,Fox replaced MSNBC and the censored/ Twitter/ controlled Carlson will be replaced by something new when the majority of concerned citizens catch on to the Carlson / censored/Twitter operation.
I may not have made myself perfectly clear.
I wasn’t suggesting we don’t look at what Carlson has to say.
I just want us to see it for what it is and listen carefully so we can identify who our next enemies are sooner that later.
Time is not on our side.
Hopefully by now it Is obvious to my fellow Treepers that Musk is a fraud by now.
Twitter as we speak is censoring in other countries at the request of their anti free speech dictatorial governments.
He is doing it here too ,just not admitting it it for economic reasons.
How does one have censoring in one country and not another in an international platform ?
I guess that it is so obvious that these clowns quit wearing the blue and yellow ribbons.
Nuance; a subtle distinction or variation. Can be used as an honest mans polite tool of communication or used from a dishonest man as sleight of hand to affect skullduggery. Is Tucker hedging his bets? As Sundance so aptly points out, nuance is all it takes to change the whole narrative either for good or bad. Time will tell…..
MAGA 👊👊🇺🇸🇺🇸🙏🏻🙏🏻❤️❤️
We knew who he meant, and he knew we knew who he meant…
Unless the election integrity efforts now in progress around the country can be coordinated and properly funded, those activities will not keep the Democrats from stealing the 2024 election cycle and installing Gavin Newsom in the White House in January 2025.
I’ve seen no evidence that the kind of coordination and the kind of funding needed to make all these disparate election integrity efforts useful and effective in time for the 2024 cycle is currently present and operative.
Very few Republican candidates in my Blue State will even dare mention election integrity or election process reform. In fact, I can only recall two. One would think that election process reform would be at the top of a conservative State Rep’s agenda. But it is eerily absent. Such silence screams much louder than words. We have all been played, and it’s been going on for a lot longer than we initially realized.
I want a new party. Problem there is how to prevent it from becoming money-driven so that it doesn’t end up in the same corrupt, self-serving place?
While we either bask in the glory of some essential truths finally being told, we who have long awaited that event, or quarrel over the intentions around the omission of the name Trump, we miss the most important few sentences.
Go back and listen once again to his discussion of the Seizure of Dictatorial Powers due to the Outbreak of War.
It is amazing how certain items of particular impact can just be slid in but missed by most. Sort of like listening to “Father Figure” without once realizing it was a song about pedophilia. When you are on the look out for it, you see it.
Tucker just either dropped a preview or a warning with this episode. Or, predictive programming style, both.
Why are the warmongers doing backflips to get to WWIII?
It’s a win win win . . . But the biggest win for them is the declaration of martial law, military lockdowns, and the cancellation of elections.
Consider ourselves tipped off about the next big chess move.
Tucker is wrong. There are three candidates who oppose the war: Trump, Ramaswami and Kennedy.
I caught that too, but might be another one of TC’s nuances. my guess the reason is, I really don’t know what the reason is. lol. No doubt TC choose his words carefully, he has a reason for stating that the way he did.
Or perhaps it’s because twitter is still censoring…already here in US and now in Europe
https://bigleaguepolitics.com/twitter-abandons-free-speech-folds-to-new-european-union-censorship-regulations/
Tucker–and EVERY REAL CONSERVATIVE–should abandon Twitter. Elon made some improvements on the margin, but there are still algorithmic thumbs on the scale. He has successfully bought off conservatives by playing nice with some big names who were throttled (Sean Davis).
Now Twitter is going to allow the unelected bureaucratic scum at the EU to override the US Constitution and US law. If conservatives don’t walk this time, there will never be a return to 1st Amendment liberties. Talking to you, Twitter users! GTFO or kill off free speech.
You don’t need to sign up to read twat comments as most of us have done for years
What? Conservatives shouldn’t be in any legacy media either?
No, conservatives need to go where the lefties are and engage them, not just exist in an echo chamber on the right.
I don’t want to eng.age “them”, I think the more they win is the more, and bigger, they will hurt. In the end they will beg for change and the pendulum will swing much further than imagined, maybe too far. I have seen this before.
How do you engage with cult members?
Those with influence stir up their followers from behind massive security.
The sheeple have to finally experience more pain from capitulating than running from the fear of a reversal.
I encounter the smell of musk., its a literal word, in my house every day. In this big old brick house. I know now how to remediate my house so it smells good : turn the dehumidifier on, use charcoal in the darkest places to absorb moisture, etc. Never chemicals and all is well.
Elon Musk may eventually change his last name. I figure he is just another pawn. Toying with owning Twitter to satisfy his whims. If Twitter fails under his aegis, he can write it off on his tax return as a loss. He has nothing to lose financially on this venture.
Except that he will lose his place in his own Sun. Another useful idiot trillionaire bites the dust. YAWNING deeply now because I don’t care what he does.
I dont think so, but you are entitled to an opinion. In the grand scheme of things TC clearly and positively identified Trump. My opinion (just guessing) more likely TC did not want to say Trump’s name due that is TC’s style of journalism. IMO its a hairbrained deduction that not speaking Trump’s name out loud is nuance of being compromised.
How long have you been here?
If a long time, I am surprised to see you imply a level of sensationalism to Sundance.
Rush not only indicated Sundance as one of his source news sites, but he similarly built a style of deduction by observation of repeated patterns.
if the shoe fits, wear it.
Sundance is never hair-brained.
He simply notices the small things, brings them to our attention, and then lets the discussion of them commence.
He did not imply compromise. He simply stated a small observation. Your interpretation of it has potential as well.
I betcha he left out the word viable because he had to.
Yup, only it’s 80+ million of us that want nothing to do with the Obama/Surveillance State sanctioned war that enriches the military complex and it’s political ticks.
Why would Tucker care about Ramaswami and JFK they will never be approved by the swamp either, and Trump isn’t going away.
TC narrowed it down to one and only one GOP candidate with his word selection, exclusively and with pinpoint precision, TC named Trump without saying Trump’s name. No other GOP candidate is under indictment with the opposition party trying to put Trump in jail. (another Nuance? TC did not name the opposition party. Does anyone need to guess its the Democrat party and or the Uni-Party)
TC was onboard with shutting out Trump and denying election fraud until fairly recently
Anybody not smart enough to be watchful of him caving is naive.
He bravely said if he was censored he would leave Twitter but those are just words and it has to be an incredible rush to suddenly have a gigantic world audience.
If he walks away, despite his staunch attitude, he does not have nearly the behind the scenes muscle that Musk’s money gives him.
Musk is only partly red pilled. He has indicated he still thinks he can straddle both sides.
Trump came into office with so many strong connections on both sides he thought the same. Within a New York minute upwards of 75% of those who had been allies and kiss-ups abandoned him and applauded Kathy Griffith’s photo of her holding a bloody, severed Trump head.
No
So that eliminates both RFK (who will not run GOP unless he takes a course change, which could be very interesting), and Vivek.
My guess:
Tucker did not include Vivek on the grounds that, no matter how much he is willing to state that he supports PDJT against the Lawfare persecution (for which I thank him), he is still running against PDJT.
And no one running against PDJT on the GOP side has a real chance.
And, hundreds of thousands of tax-paying Americans!
But there is only one candidate WHO WAS ALREADY DULY RE-ELECTED BY THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.