DNI John Ratcliffe Presents Senate With Brennan Notes Showcasing Clinton Campaign Intent to Create Russian Conspiracy Narrative July 2016…

Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe has transmitted evidence to the Senate Judiciary Committee showing notes written by CIA Director John Brennan that Hillary Clinton campaign advisors created a “proposal to vilify Trump by stirring up scandal claiming interference by Russian security services” on July 26th of 2016. [pdf link]


This appears to be the explosive evidence referred to by Senator Lindsey Graham during recent public comments.  The date of the proposal to Brennan, July 26, 2016, is pertinent to the recent op-ed published by Brennan where he says he briefed President Obama two days later, July 28, 2016, where Brennan says in his own words:

[…]  on the afternoon of July 28, 2016, I informed [President Obama] in a hurriedly scheduled meeting that Russian President Vladimir Putin had authorized his intelligence services to carry out activities to hurt Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton and boost the election prospects of Donald Trump. (link)

Hillary Clinton proposing the strategic deployment of a Russian collusion narrative on July 26, 2016, is additionally important because only one day earlier, July 25, 2016, Clinton campaign Manager Robby Mook advocated for this exact narrative on the first day of the 2016 Democrat National Convention in Philadelphia.

  • July 25, 2016, Robby Mook is presenting the Russian conspiracy narrative.
  • July 26, 2016, a Clinton foreign policy advisor is pushing this narrative to CIA Director John Brennan.
  • July 28, 2016, CIA Director John Brennan pushes the Clinton-inspired Russian conspiracy narrative into the oval office and briefs President Barack Obama.
  • July 31, 2016, FBI Agent Peter Strzok launches the “Electronic Communication” which officially begins the Trump-Russia investigation.  [LINK]

Then on August 5, 2016, former Acting CIA Director and Clinton campaign advisor, Mike Morell publishes an op-ed in the New York Times, fueling the Clinton-inspired Russian conspiracy narrative:

…”In the intelligence business, we would say that Mr. Putin had recruited Mr. Trump as an unwitting agent of the Russian Federation.”…  (~Mike Morell)

Mike Morell is deeply connected to the Clinton camp, particularly surrounding his prior efforts to defend then Secretary of State Clinton over Benghazi.  According to former CIA Director Leon Panetta it was Mike Morell (Intel) and Ben Rhodes (White House) who wrote the infamous Susan Rice talking points, which were all lies.

So the substantive background of how Hillary Clinton’s campaign hired Fusion-GPS and Chris Steele in April of 2016 to create the Russian conspiracy narrative takes on new focus.

Keep in mind, at the heart of the July 2016 Russian narrative was a story about Donald Trump Jr. meeting with a Russian attorney named Natalia Veselnitskaya.  That meeting took place on June 9th 2016 in Trump Tower.  However, video and images show that 5 days later, June 14th 2016, Ms. Veselnitskaya was a guest of former Obama administration Russian Ambassador Michael McFaul in Washington DC for a House of Representatives hearing on U.S. Policy Toward Putin’s Russia.  [Video HERE – and Video HERE]

Ms. Natalia Veselnitskaya is pictured seated in the front row directly behind former U.S. Ambassador to Russia Mr. Michael McFaul at the House Foreign Affairs Committee. This is June 14th, 2016, five days after the reported meeting with Donald Trump Jr.

Link to Ambassador McFaul’s testimony (confirming date) is HERE

It should be noted that Ambassador Mike McFaul was very publicly discussing the ‘Muh Russia’ conspiracy narrative in the media and appeared on numerous NBC and MSNBC broadcasts during the 2016 campaign, and immediately after the election.

Additionally, it was Michael McFaul who was the architect of the Obama/Clinton “Russian Reset”, that eventually led McFaul to becoming the Ambassador to Russia (NYT Link).

Ambassador Michael McFaul immediately caused quite a bit of controversy while in Russia as he indulged with various anti-Putin operatives.

Michael McFaul, the U.S. ambassador in Moscow from 2012-2014, was accused by Russian state television of seeking to orchestrate the overthrow of President Vladimir Putin after hosting opposition activists and Kremlin critics at the embassy in his second day on the job.  (Politico Link)

Another example of McFaul’s in-your-face antagonism is HERE.

On the heels of the 2011 WikiLeaks State Department Cables release (example below) Ambassador McFaul was kicked out of Russia:

(C) On January 14, National Security Council Senior Director for Russia Michael McFaul met with Boris Nemtsov and Vladimir Milov of the Solidarity Movement, Grigoriy Bovt of the political party Right Cause, and Vladimir Ryzhkov, former head of the now defunct Russia’s Republican Party and professor at Moscow’s Higher School of Economics. All four leaders view Barack Obama as a highly pragmatic president focused on external cooperation with Russia, but supposedly not willing to pressure the Russian government for greater political freedom. President Medvedev is not seen as a viable alternative to Prime Minister Putin, who they believe will likely retake the Presidency in 2012. This, according to them, will ensure that a corrupt and unresponsive government continues to run Russia. They agreed that the aim of the political opposition over the next two years should be to prevent the return of Putin to the presidency. According to them, however, given Putin’s control over society only an emergency situation could bring about his fall from grace.

[…]  McFaul opined that “de-Putinization” must come from within Russia, from a focus on civil education to broaden demands within society for increased freedom. Though the President may not be as vocal about his support for civil society within Russia as opposition members in Russia might prefer, McFaul made clear to this group, all of whom he has known throughout his career, that the President fully supports democratic reform in Russia. All agreed that dramatic change in the Russian political landscape would not take place in the near future.

5. National Security Council Senior Director for Russia Michael McFaul has cleared on this cable.  (WikiLeaks Cable Link)

It should also be noted that Ambassador McFaul’s friend, Ms. Natalia Veselnitskaya, was initially denied an entry visa into the United States in 2016 and appealed her situation to the U.S. District Court of New York.  She was granted a parole letter allowing her to enter the United States on behalf of a client. Here’s her filing to the U.S. District Court in New York.

The actual date of the arguments in the case U.S. -v- Prevezon Holdings was the EXACT SAME date as the meeting in Trump Tower – June 9th 2016 CASE LINK

And look at the participating attorneys. A smorgasbord of anti-Trumpers writ large. Attorney(s) appearing for the case:

JACOB W. BUCHDAHL (Cory S. Buland, on the brief), Susman Godfrey LLP, New York, NY, for Movant-Appellant Hermitage Capital Management Ltd.

PAUL MONTELEONI, Assistant United States Attorney (Cristine Phillips, Margaret Garnett, Assistant United States Attorneys, on the brief), for Preet Bharara, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, for Plaintiff-Appellee the United States of America.

MICHAEL B. MUKASEY (Jennifer F. Mintz, Jarrod L. Schaeffer, on the brief), Debevoise & Plimpton, LLP, New York, NY, for Defendants-Appellees Prevezon Holdings Ltd., Prevezon Alexander, LLC, Prevezon Soho USA, LLC, Prevezon Seven USA, LLC, Prevezon Pine USA, LLC, Prevezon 1711 USA, LLC, Prevezon 1810 LLC, Prevezon 2009 USA, LLC, and Prevezon 2011 USA, LLC.

Before: POOLER, LOHIER, and CARNEY, Circuit Judges.

Yes, THAT Preet Bharara.

Natalia Veselnitskaya was also a very vocal anti-Trump person on all of her social media accounts – SEE FACEBOOK ARCHIVE HERE –  So why would an anti-Trump Russian with close ties to the Clinton campaign group want to deliver information to Donald Trump Jr?   Donald Trump Jr. said he had no idea whom he would be meeting with.

  • April – Fusion GPS hired to dig up dirt on Trump.  Fusion hires Chris Steele to write his fabricated Trump-Russia Dossier.
  • June – Clinton campaign coordinates with State Dept. allies to introduce Veselnitskaya to Donald Trump Jr.
  • July – Clinton campaign pushes Russian conspiracy narrative to allies in intelligence community, John Brennan.   Peter Strzok begins Trump-Russia investigation; FBI, DOJ and aggregate intelligence community weaponized to assist.
  • August – Clinton campaign advisor writes op-ed in New York Times postulating Trump-Russia collusion narrative.
  • September – U.S. intelligence officials forwarded an investigative referral to FBI Director James Comey and Deputy Assistant Director of Counterintelligence Peter Strzok regarding “U.S. Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s approval of a plan concerning U.S. Presidential candidate Donald Trump and Russian hackers hampering U.S. elections as a means of distracting the public from her use of a private mail server.” (link)

Now, let’s see that September 2016 referral !

This entry was posted in 4th Amendment, 6th Amendment, AG Bill Barr, Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Clinton(s), Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Donald Trump, Election 2020, FBI, IG Report Clinton Investigation, IG Report Comey, IG Report FISA Abuse, IG Report McCabe, Legislation, media bias, Notorious Liars, President Trump, propaganda, Russia, Spygate, Spying, THE BIG UGLY, Tripwires, Uncategorized, USA, White House Coverup. Bookmark the permalink.

420 Responses to DNI John Ratcliffe Presents Senate With Brennan Notes Showcasing Clinton Campaign Intent to Create Russian Conspiracy Narrative July 2016…

  1. valleyj says:

    This evidence should get people out in the millions to vote Trump. He wins they go down. It’s as simple as that!

    Liked by 5 people

  2. lavender blue says:

    If you have a senator from your state on this committee, please make your voice heard. Treepers r a much more informed group thx to SD, than many Americans. https://www.judiciary.senate.gov

    Liked by 4 people

  3. PaulCohen says:

    Liked by 5 people

    • WhiteBoard says:

      Danchenko is Fiona Hill is Brookings Institute. is Impeachment is Ukraine State Dept.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Lady Sid says:

        Don’t forget Strobe Talbott. He hired Fiona at Brookings Institution. Strobe was head of the place for 15 yrs, and before that, one of the Clintons best associates/buddies since 1968! His late wife, Brooke Shearer, was Derek and Cody Shearer’s sister. Cody got a second “edition” of the Dossier from Strobe. Here’s the weird thing: there is a very strong facial resemblance to Strobe’s late mother, Josephine Large Talbott (wealthy Northern New Jersey family) to both Brooke Shearer and to Fiona Hill. Dark hair and piercing eyes. Strobe’s Dad, ‘Bud’ was from the Mead Paper Co. family in Dayton OH. Strobe graduated from Yale #1 in his class in 1968; then went on to Rhodes Scholarship at Oxford. Etc.etc. I think he thought it was all a big joke to have a “Russia Collusion” to scare people from voting for Donald Trump in 2016. I remember Hillary mentioning it one of the debates. It got away from them all.

        Liked by 2 people

        • j'accuse says:

          “Cody got a second “edition” of the Dossier from Strobe”

          I have read that Cody Shearer & Sid Blumenthal were traveling around trying to confirm of corroborate the dossier (or the version they were given). If that is true, it’s perplexing to me why they would waste time trying to corroborate the dossier if they knew it fabricated or a just rumors. Also they would have made themselves witnesses to whatever they discovered or heard, for example if they spoke to Russians who discredited the dossier claims they would then put themselves in a difficult position. Did they know about Steele?

          Mention of those two has been sparse but it appears they were active in the background. Trey Gowdy made a comment (I recall it was to Martha McCullum) that I understood to suggest that Blumenthal may have been involved in putting together the dossier. Hard to imagine HRC doing anything without her old friend and lieutenant being involved or at least aware of it.

          Liked by 1 person

          • David A says:

            They were perhaps not trying to hard, just hard enough to give the appearance of it as being legitimate, a white wash. That whitewash was McCain’s job as well. He had no need to travel for something produced internally, paid for by HRC, which he knew about before hand.

            Liked by 2 people

          • PaulCohen says:

            Cody and Sid were involved in developing the early version of the “dossier” …. they were shopping around the b.s. not to “confirm” anything but to spread the mess through the MSM…. so that over time careless or unscrupulous “journalists” (i.e., nearly all of them) could start to believe items had been confirmed because they “heard” about it from different angles.

            Kinda like how the FBI allowed Michael Isikoff to “confirm” aspects of the Steele dossier when it was Steele himself who fed the material to Isikoff.

            Garbage in, garbage out.

            Just what all the scumbags involved wanted. One big gossipy s###storm of lies and innuendo packaged and re-packaged as “intel”….

            Liked by 1 person

  4. Bogeyfree says:

    Has anybody thought just how perfect the timing of this revelation is for the Judiciary Committee in advance of upcoming Comey’s testimony.

    This Radcliffe letter just allowed all the R’s on the committee to tear up their original dumb questions and provided them with a whole new set of laser focused questions.

    This release was pure genius and I give Barr a lot of the credit.

    Liked by 8 people

  5. joebkonobi says:

    I remember sometime during the election Hellary stating something to the effect of “if that bastard get’s elected, we’ll all hang.” She obviously overestimated DOJ & FBI’s competence or underestimated their proficiency in corruption.

    Liked by 5 people

  6. furtive says:

    July 4, 2016 clinton “i DONT recall” interview with peter STRZOK
    Immunity provided all her hand maids witnessing the interview.
    No seizing of electronic devices or pc’s by ANY in attendance.

    Liked by 4 people

  7. daylight58 says:

    September Surprise!

    Liked by 2 people

  8. devilsdictionary says:

    This WAS the insurance policy.

    Liked by 1 person

  9. Bogeyfree says:

    Please tell me if I have this right…… this Radcliffe letter states…………

    1) HRC concocted the entire Russia Collusion fraud, including the DNC hack via Russians?

    2) Brennen briefs Obama and his other National Security advisor’s about the HRC plan to vilify DJT in July 2016 before the election.

    3) So right there doesn’t this mean that Obama went along with this plan and didn’t try to stop it?

    4) HRC goes to the FIB to begin to begin implementing the plan in July 2016

    5) So post Nov election, PT is now the duly elected President of the United States and during this transition period where Obama would have had plenty of opportunity to shut this scheme down, he chooses not to and in fact ratchets up the persecution of Gen. Flynn in the Jan 2017 meeting?

    Do I have this right so far?

    If so a few questions.

    1) was the Susan Rice by the book e-mail to herself possible not about the Gen Flynn meeting but the July 2016 meeting where they all knew the Russia Collusion was a fraud and a scheme by Hillary that they agreed to??

    2) so if a former President condones and supports the illegal persecution of a sitting President is that Sedition Conspiracy and Depre action of Rights under color of law?

    Now I see why PT has said I caught the swamp, I caught them all.

    Also I now see possibly why Maria said no indictment until after the election because IMO this is fairly new evidence and it now GREATLY expands Barr’s case to possibly include a Ex Sec of State and an Ex President.

    If I’ve got this right, then this is HUGE!

    Liked by 7 people

    • TonyEuropa says:

      And Biden too.

      Liked by 4 people

    • Teddy_KGB says:

      And what happened just weeks before the July 26, 2016 Obama/Brennan Oval Office briefing regarding HRC’s best laid plans to vilify DJT?

      The June 27, 2016 tarmac meeting between Miss Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton…

      Liked by 3 people

    • Teddy_KGB says:

      And what happened just weeks before the July 26, 2016 Obama/Brennan Oval Office briefing regarding HRC’s best laid plans to vilify DJT?

      The June 27, 2016 tarmac meeting between Miss Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton…

      Liked by 3 people

    • iwasthere says:

      To me, as a former spook myself, you do know our IC does work with Russia’s IC on common issues, like terrorism, ISIS, etc. and there are official workings groups. My 2 cents? This is something the Russian IC would have offered to the Agency (it’s not a spy, in other words) — because this is potentially very damaging to the relationship and the shared goals. Obviously. So that fact that Brennon had to brief Obama, reinforces that fact that this ‘intel’ came up thru career IC channels, i.e., (Russia() We know that Hillary is doing blame casting to blame us, and it’s a political hack job that is not the truth. Say the name —-> Seth Rich. It was an insider leak to wikileaks. My 2 cents.

      Liked by 6 people

    • anthonydog says:

      Lock her up and then toss the key

      Liked by 1 person

  10. TonyEuropa says:


    Someone needs to go to jail now. Start with Hillary.

    Naturally, do not expect the corporate propaganda machine to pay attention to this… just as they don’t pay attention to Gen. Flynn’s saga.

    It’d be sweet if Trump brought this up at tonight’s debate: “Oh, btw, did you hear that….?”

    Liked by 3 people

  11. Linus in W.PA. says:

    So, once the ‘Investigative Referral’ is sent to the FBI, there is already a bogus investigation that has been started to smear Trump with Russia, Russia, Russia.

    So what is the real significance of the referral? That the FBI should have then known all their previous feces was still bull feces??

    Liked by 2 people

  12. swamph8er says:

    Early May – Mifsud and Downer set up the Russia has Hillary’s emails narrative
    Late May – DNC server is downloaded by Seth Rich. Crowdstrike lies and said Russia did it. A whistleblower in SHADOWGATE claims Brennan directed Seth Rich to download the server. If true, it was just another part of Brennan’s coordinated operation.

    Additional note:
    Preet Bharara and John P. Carlin oversaw the 2013-2016 case against Russian Buryakov, where CIA spy Carter Page was a witness (FBI also had a FISA on Page in 2014). Carter Page was still a witness when he joined the Trump campaign. Did corrupt Bharara and Carlin direct Carter Page to join the Trump campaign?


    Liked by 1 person

    • jx says:

      Crowdstrike built a circumstantial case to support their claim. That case was based on claims made by a Russian blogger. When this was exposed Crowdstrike retracted the core of their claim, but they – like Dan Rather – stood by their unsupported claim.

      Liked by 1 person

      • j'accuse says:

        CrowdStrike with perhaps help from folks at Perkins Coie fabricated the report in all probability. It isn’t based on forensics,, that much we know. The report was sent to the FBI by Perkins Coie with redactions (believe it or not) but no computer evidence whatsoever. At least that’s my understanding from some twitter sleuths who found that in the Senate report. (The official who received the report was Assistant Director Trainor)

        Liked by 1 person

    • MGBSE says:

      “A whistleblower in SHADOWGATE claims Brennan directed Seth Rich to download the server” …

      WOW … if true … no wonder Rich was murdered … is the whistleblower still alive?

      Wasn’t an FBI gun reported “stolen” from an agents car prior to the Rich murder? Murder weapon?


  13. Robby $#&%ing Mook and his media band of brothers.

    Liked by 1 person

    • https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2018/03/05/the-russian-interference-fight-was-encapsulated-in-one-cnn-show-in-july-2016/

      “July 24 was two days after WikiLeaks began releasing thousands of documents stolen from the Democratic National Committee. The Washington Post had reported the previous month that the DNC had been hacked, citing initial and subsequent analyses that linked the hacks to the Russian government. The effect of the release was to undermine and disrupt the Democratic National Convention, which began July 25 and focused on bridging the gap between supporters of Sanders and Clinton.

      Tapper asked Mook for the Clinton campaign’s reaction to the release.

      “Well,” Mook said, “I think the DNC needs to look into this and take appropriate action, and I’m sure that they will. What’s disturbing to us is that we — experts are telling us that Russian state actors broke into the DNC, stole these emails. And other experts are now saying that the Russians are releasing these emails for the purpose of actually helping Donald Trump.”

      “I don’t think it’s very coincidental that they are being released at this time to create maximum damage on Hillary Clinton and to help Donald Trump,” he later added.

      “But it is a very, very strong charge that you’re leveling here,” Tapper said. “You’re basically suggesting that Russians hacked into the DNC and now are releasing these files through WikiLeaks to help elect Donald Trump.”

      “Well, this isn’t my assertion,” Mook replied. “There are a number of experts that are asserting this.””

      Liked by 3 people

    • Your Tour Guide says:

      Gaystapo. Hillary was surrounded by them.

      Mook, David Brock…… ( Feel free to add to the list)

      Liked by 2 people

    • sticknca says:

      Friggin’ Mook crying after the loss?
      Crying because he knows what can happen to him because of Trump.

      Liked by 1 person

  14. Jerry Joe says:

    Through Feinstein’s ‘oopsie’ release of House testimony, we also know Glenn Simpson connected himself neatly into this Prevezon matter.

    Liked by 1 person

  15. Publius2016 says:

    Yes, Seth Rich was left to warn all other Bernie Bots that Dimms take care of business…yet here we sit 4 years later and watch as Fake News talks about tax returns and social justice…

    This was an Execution in the Heart of DC…all surveillance for 6 months erased…another man sits to rot in a London Prison as Fake Reporters live high on the hog…to what end?

    The moment these Communists take over, they will take Fake News, Globalists Lords, and all other collaborators out…look at history fools…we are USA because of real sacrifice of Patriots like Gen. Flynn and 45!

    Liked by 3 people

    • tds247365 says:

      Exactly. All the Useful Idiots that help usher in Communism are the first eliminated. Even the Useful Idiots would revolt once they realize that the promised Socialism is a unicorn.

      Liked by 1 person

  16. Murray in Nashville says:

    Hold on partners……………………

    I smell a rat (or six)…………………..

    How can Miss Lindsey question Comey about this WITHOUT insulating him from later prosecution because his answers were compelled?

    Liked by 1 person

  17. Johnny Dollar says:

    The released memo needs to be evaluated from the following perspective:

    The Steele dossier had two different tracks, each set up for a different purpose

    Track 1: Steele ~> paid by FBI (2/16) for dossier ~> in case DT wins election~> Mueller (insurance)

    Track 2: Steele ~> paid by HRC for dossier ~> public release before election (counter Wiki leaks)

    Notice, two different paymasters and the conflict of interest between the two tracks.

    Track one moves along smoothly during 2016.

    Until HRC gets hurt by Wiki. Then she calls for Steele help. Track one people get wind of her recruiting their man Steele. Panic in track 1.

    If she succeeds in getting the dossier to go public before the election, there goes the insurance policy.

    That’s what these memos are about. IMO.

    HRC, resisted by track 1 people, failed to get the dossier out before the election. She loses and remains pissed about it to this day.


  18. Troublemaker10 says:

    Liked by 2 people

  19. anthonydog says:

    We The People must stand up for America.

    Liked by 1 person

  20. Troublemaker10 says:

    Liked by 3 people

  21. islandpalmtrees says:

    This comes to us by way of WhiteBoard regarding a funding question, I had.

    “BB in Mark Warner’s text to Adam Waldman (via Stelle and Oleg Deripaska)
    Bill Browder — Atlantic Council — UN MAFIA strong arming the world through the Magintsky Act.”

    Ms. Veselnitskaya is connected to Bill Browder and the Magintsky Act. Suggesting that the driving force behind Ms. Veselnitskaya visit to the U.S. was Bill Browder.

    Is this all about the movement of Russian mafia?

    The case led to American sanctions against Russia, which were signed into law by President Barack Obama in 2012, after a campaign by U.S.-born financier Bill Browder. While the Swiss authorities originally froze millions connected to the Magnitsky case that flowed through Switzerland nine years ago, the case has stalled.

    Victor K., who was responsible for working on investigations into the Swiss financial dealing of the Russian mafia and oligarchs for decades.


    Liked by 1 person

    • islandpalmtrees says:

      Is this all about the movement of Russian mafia money? If so, to where and for what reason?

      Liked by 1 person

    • gsonFIT says:

      I think there is a difference between Russian Mafia and the Oligarchs. The Russian people were thankful that Putin controlled the Oligarchs. It appears to me the Magnitsky sanctions were designed to harm the Oligarchs and not Russian Mafia. I am very curious where Bill Browder fits in to this.

      I do know that Mcfaul and Browder worked closely together.

      Liked by 2 people

  22. bessie2003 says:

    This new John Spiropoulos release, Episode #13, is timely given today’s information released by Mr. Ratcliffe:

    Liked by 2 people

  23. T2020 says:

    Big question of the day: Do the coup plotters like Stripes or Orange?

    Liked by 1 person

  24. dd_sc says:

    September – U.S. intelligence officials forwarded an investigative referral to FBI Director James Comey and Deputy Assistant Director of Counterintelligence Peter Strzok…

    Assistant Director of Counterintelligence Bill Priestap out of the loop?

    Liked by 1 person

  25. Bogeyfree says:

    Why is no one asking the obvious question based on Radcliffe’s additional statement saying this IS NOT Russian Disinformation?

    Meaning if this new evidence isn’t from Russia or via Russia IC reports then where would it come from?

    Is it possible that this information comes from HRC herself/team and by that I wonder if this vilify plan isn’t contained and from and has been found from one of the many HRC missing emails on the unsecure server or maybe part of the Wiener Laptop contents?

    Radcliffe IMO would not put this out unless the information was 100% verifiable and if not from Russia then what would be more verifiable than an actual HRC email?

    Just speculating here but clearly to make the statements he does sure seems to imply they have something unequivocal.

    Sundance, I hope you do a follow up on this as IMO it is huge.

    Liked by 3 people

    • PaulCohen says:

      emails on Weiner laptop???

      Everyone has focuses upon speculations about (1) missing “30,000 emails” from Hillary’s private server years before, and (2) alleged lurid video(s)…

      BUT, if Weiner had his laptop all through the summer of 2016 (he wasn’t arrested until Sept. 2016), and if Huma/Hillary emails were still being auto-forwarded there, then FBI ought to have everything that came to/from Hillary, Huma, and campaign colleagues in 2015-16.

      IF Durham & co. finally had all materials on that laptop properly examined, there may be all kinds of evidence of Hillary/Huma/DNC and campaign activity in 2015-16…. including (perhaps) much on the origins and development of Russiagate, Sid Blumenthal and Cody Shearer, Steele dossier, Perkins Coie doing dirty work with FusionGPS, etc. etc.

      Liked by 2 people

  26. PaulCohen says:


    • Bogeyfree says:

      And depose Assange because based on his answers and the Ty Clevenger case the DOJ may want to consider re-opening the Seth Rich case.

      I’ve always wondered why the FBI would not turn over via the FOIA request of Ty Clevenger their files on the Seth Rich Investigation.

      I wonder if Barr is looking further into all of this?

      Liked by 1 person

  27. Bogeyfree says:

    Where did this revelation that Radcliffe just declassified come from?


    1) Russia IC talking with US IC and provided it?

    2) US IC taking it from Russia IC? (Why we both have spies)

    3) Wikileaks/Assange provided it from the emails they possible secured?

    4) Found within the Wiener Laptop 600k emails

    5) Found via the 33K missing HRC on the unsecure Server?

    6) somebody within US disclosed it, maybe to throw HRC under the bus and save themselves?

    Either way I can’t see Barr allowing this as IMO he and Radcliffe must agree on declassified documents unless this information has 100% verification and is unequivocal.

    And the best place for this information to come from that meets 100% verifiable and unequivocal IMO would be an actual “discovered” email.

    Liked by 1 person

  28. David R. Graham says:

    If Sid “Vicious” Blumenthal did not write this drama, I’m a Jimmy Dean Sausage.

    Liked by 1 person

  29. Bogeyfree says:

    Questions for Sundance:

    Maybe I’m missing something here but doesn’t the Radcliffe letter say…….

    1) That Brennan briefed Obama on July 26, 2016 about the Russian knowing about the “alleged” plot, approved by HRC to vilify DJT.

    2) So isn’t the next logical question, if Obama truly didn’t know this did he confront HRC with his information?

    3) And if he didn’t then why didn’t Obama stop this from going forward now that he became aware of it on July 26, 2016?

    4) and then the follow up question is why after DJT became President elect after Nov 3, 2016 why didn’t Obama stop all of this and then especially why didn’t he stop it when DJT was confirmed as the sitting President of the US in Jan 2017?

    For the lawyers out there.

    If Obama was aware this was a fraudulent plot against a presidential candidate and then a sitting President since July 26, 2016 and didn’t take any action to expose or stop it, does that make him a possible co-conspirator if Durham indicts people under conspiracy law?

    Liked by 1 person

  30. Krashman Von Stinkputin says:

    Apparently Russian intercepts that “predicts” Hillary Clinton is planning to frame Trump for colluding with Russia
    Actual evidence of that “prediction” showing up in the form of dossier paid for by Hillary Clinton claiming that Trump is colluding with Russia

    Is NOT a proper predicate for an investigation.

    But hearsay bullshit about a suggestion of a suggestion possibly heard in a bar IS.

    Liked by 2 people

  31. TwoLaine says:

    Slimeball Robby Mook. Why am I not surprised.

    Liked by 1 person

  32. Jimbrown says:

    I was a cold warrior and very familar with how the Soviets ran disinformation campaigns.

    Putin wanted HRC to win since he owned her since U2 deal. He supported the Russisa Trump collusion op by making the Mar 2016 comments plus the intel officers’ support. It’s all outlined in the Jan 17 intelligence assessment. You cam go through the report and see which data points were provided by witting or unwitting assets.

    This latest dump shows how clever Putin is an intel officer. He made sure the CIA learned that there were Russian analysts who believed HRC created a Russia Trump conspiracyplay in July. This allowed Putin to support both sides. You have to give him credit for being a man of action.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Bogeyfree says:

      Yes but the question remains, how did the Russian learn of this “alleged” plan?

      1) they had Russian spies in her camp?

      2) They intercepted her unsecured emails?

      3) something else?

      Liked by 1 person

  33. republicanvet91 says:

    Debevoise & Plimpton

    This is the law firm Sullivan’s amicus, John Gleeson worked for in March 2016.

    Liked by 2 people

  34. GTOGUY says:

    I wonder what Comey will say tomorrow when he’s asked about that document since it was sent to him as well.


  35. mtk says:

    WTF – I nailed it all the way back with some of my first post ever made to the tree house.

    It always HRC creatures.

    The she needs to go away.
    The American people have consistently been kicking and screaming “Hell no to this vindictive, horrible lying hag.”

    We upset the apple cart in 2001. Yup, you can bet your life on the Clinton’s sat around for eight years in the 90’s going…
    How can we map out a HRC presidency.
    First Gore, then HCR in 2008.
    Obama messed that up.
    So…2016 was all about her right to the WH.

    Because by now everything a person with that type of political ego to stay in the game…
    HAS TO BE TELLING themselves lies, in order to convince themselves of the truthfulness of the baggage of lies built around their political persona.

    Get that HRC, you are that horrible of a person.

    That is why you got half the Nation calling you out.
    And, I would not put past her…
    To be going, “If I can not have the WH, how can I use that fact to advance and foster a social agenda on the Nation even more radically then could be advance IF actually in the WH.

    Do note.
    That is exactly what the MSM has been parroting for the 2020 election.


  36. minnesotamike55 says:

    From the very beginning I thought, “how dumb are people?”. HRC had so many sketchy deals with the Russians they never would have supported Trump. They had so much dirt on Hillary that she could have been easily manipulated just like in all the previous deals. They had almost no interaction with Trump comparatively. So why did everyone go along with Putin supporting Trump when he was an unknown and could spoil everything he and HRC put together?
    It now turns out that yes, the Russians were heavily invested in HRC, wanted her in the oval office, and subversively worked with her team to accomplish just that.

    Liked by 1 person

  37. TwoLaine says:

    Put the right people on this.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s