Lawsuit Claims Julian Assange Confirmed DNC Emails Received From Seth Rich – Not a Russian Hack…

A rather stunning report from Gateway Pundit outlines information contained within a lawsuit filing.  The lawsuit, filed by Businessman Ed Butowsky, alleges Wikileaks founder Julian Assange confirmed to Fox News analyst Ellen Ratner that the DNC leaked emails were received from Seth Rich and his brother Aaron.

The details contained within the lawsuit filing (full pdf below) are stunning.

If this information is true and accurate, the DOJ claim of a Russian hack –based on assertions by DNC contractor, Crowdstrike– would be entirely false.  Additionally the DC murder of Seth Rich would hold a far more alarming motive.

(Source, lawsuit filing – pdf link, page 13)

Here’s the Full Court Filing:


The ramifications here are almost too large to describe.

If this information turns out to be true and accurate, the entire narrative around the DNC “hack” will have been proven to be intentionally manufactured.

Despite the FBI’s prior admissions about never reviewing the DNC servers; and despite their recent admissions about never actually seeing the forensic computer analysis, the U.S. Department of Justice, specifically Robert Mueller, Andrew Weissmann and former DAG Rod Rosenstein, cannot blame a simple investigative ‘mistake‘ for the wrong attribution of who gave the DNC emails to Wikileaks.

The FBI, the DOJ and the Mueller special counsel have each purposefully claimed specific Russian actors were responsible for hacking the DNC in 2016.  If it turns out those claims were based on falsehood, the integrity of the DOJ and Special Counsel collapses.

Mr. Butowsky is making a very serious allegation in this court filing.

Additionally, the previously discussed motive to arrest Julian Assange would now be further enhanced.  Heck, the reason for Assange’ arrest would be brutally obvious.

♦Dana Boente was head of DOJ-NSD from May 11th, 2017 through end of October 2017 when he officially announced his intent to retire. However, the timeline gets cloudy here because Boente said he was staying on until an official replacement was announced. There’s no indication of when Boente actually left the DOJ-NSD or the Eastern District of Virginia (EDVA) role.

On January 23rd, 2018, FBI Director Christopher Wray announced Dana Boente had shifted over to the FBI to be Chief Legal Counsel (replacing James Baker) where Boente remains today. As Mueller was using 19 lawyers, and 50 FBI investigators, Boente was/is the legal counsel to FBI Director Christopher Wray while the Mueller probe was ongoing.

[Remember, Robert Mueller never interviewed Julian Assange.  Additionally, it is worth noting for the U.S. side of the legal framework, the charges against Assange are not related to Russian efforts in a hack of the DNC; nor is Assange charged with anything related to the 2016 U.S. election interference activities, the Podesta email release or anything therein as previously described by the DOJ.]

The April 11th, 2019, Julian Assange indictment stemmed from the Eastern District of Virginia.  From a review of the indictment we discover it was under seal since March 6th, 2018: (The DOJ sat on the indictment for 13 months, until Mueller finished)

(Link to pdf)

However, on Tuesday April 15th, 2019, more investigative material was released. Again, note the dates: Grand Jury, *December of 2017* This means FBI investigation prior to December ’17..

The investigation of Assange took place prior to December 2017, it is coming from the EDVA where Dana Boente was still, presumably, U.S. Attorney. The grand jury indictment was sealed from March of 2018 until April of 2019.

Why was there a delay?

Why did the DOJ wait until the Mueller report was complete?

Here’s where it gets interesting….

The FBI submission to the Grand Jury in December of 2017 was four months after congressman Dana Rohrabacher talked to Assange in August of 2017: “Assange told a U.S. congressman … he can prove the leaked Democratic Party documents … did not come from Russia.”

(August 2017, The Hill Via John Solomon) Julian Assange told a U.S. congressman on Tuesday he can prove the leaked Democratic Party documents he published during last year’s election did not come from Russia and promised additional helpful information about the leaks in the near future.

Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, a California Republican who is friendly to Russia and chairs an important House subcommittee on Eurasia policy, became the first American congressman to meet with Assange during a three-hour private gathering at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, where the WikiLeaks founder has been holed up for years.

Rohrabacher recounted his conversation with Assange to The Hill.

“Our three-hour meeting covered a wide array of issues, including the WikiLeaks exposure of the DNC [Democratic National Committee] emails during last year’s presidential election,” Rohrabacher said, “Julian emphatically stated that the Russians were not involved in the hacking or disclosure of those emails.”

Pressed for more detail on the source of the documents, Rohrabacher said he had information to share privately with President Trump. (read more)

If you overlay the timing, it would appear the FBI took a keen interest in Assange after this August 2017 meeting and gathered specific evidence for a grand jury by December 2017. Then the DOJ sat on the indictment (sealed in March 2018) while the Mueller probe was ongoing; until April 11th, 2019, when a coordinated effort between the U.K. and U.S. was launched. Assange was arrested, and the indictment was unsealed (link).

To me, as a person who has researched this three year fiasco; including the ridiculously false 2016 Russian hacking/interference narrative: “17 intelligence agencies”, JAR report (needed for Obama – December 29th, ’16), and political ICA (January ’17); this looked like a Deep State move to control Julian Assange because the Mueller report was dependent on Russia cybercrimes…. AND that narrative is contingent on the Russia DNC hack story.

The Weissmann/Mueller/Rosenstein report contains claims that Russia hacked the DNC servers as the central element to the Russia interference narrative in the U.S. election. This claim is directly disputed by WikiLeaks and Assange, as outlined during the Dana Rohrabacher interview.

Right there is the FBI motive to shut Assange down when the Mueller report was released.

The DNC hack claim is contingent upon analysis by Crowdstrike computer forensics who were paid by the DNC to look into the issue. The FBI was never allowed to review the servers independently, and now we know the FBI never even looked at a full forensics report from Crowdstrike.

Almost all independent research into this DNC hack narrative challenges the claims of a Russia hack of the DNC servers; and now this bombshell court filing, again if accurate, makes the DOJ claim completely collapse.

Lastly, if we are to believe everything that is factually visible; including the admissions by the FBI and DOJ itself; and it is proven that Seth Rich was indeed the source of the DNC emails and there was no hack; well,… what does that say about Robert Mueller and Rod Rosenstein, who would have had to know they were pushing abject lies in their dubious Russian indictments.

The ramifications of this court filing are huge.


This entry was posted in 1st Amendment, 4th Amendment, 6th Amendment, Abusive Cops, AG Bill Barr, AG Jeff Sessions, Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dept Of Justice, Donald Trump, FBI, IG Report Clinton Investigation, IG Report FISA Abuse, IG Report McCabe, media bias, Notorious Liars, President Trump, Russia, Spygate, Spying, THE BIG UGLY, Uncategorized, White House Coverup, Wikileaks. Bookmark the permalink.

1,015 Responses to Lawsuit Claims Julian Assange Confirmed DNC Emails Received From Seth Rich – Not a Russian Hack…

  1. It now becomes a must question for Mueller: Why didn’t you interview Assange?

    Liked by 31 people

    • The Boss says:

      And it now becomes another must question for Mueller: Are you a damn idiot going before Congress? Or are you gong to cancel?

      Liked by 13 people

    • Pyrran says:

      Which is why Mueller will never testify.

      Liked by 14 people

    • guybee55 says:

      Want to bet this means he does not show?????????????

      Liked by 7 people

    • frances says:

      First rule; never ask a defendant a question you don’t already know the answer to. Corollary; never interview someone you have framed for a crime.

      Liked by 14 people

    • Rachel Guess says:

      It was obvious from the get-go that the dnc servers were not ‘hacked by russians’, it was always known to be a leak and the meta data proved it…RIP Seth Rich. When they filed an indictment against Assange, not even one mention of the alleged dnc ‘hack’ was ever brought up. All of the charges relate to the bradley manning issue, with Assange being accused of being an accessory to manning.

      After three years of having to listen to the constant whine of ‘muh russia! muh russia! muh russia!’ and all the other histrionic hyperbole of the left, then suddenly, not even a whisper of the alleged dnc server ‘hack’ when they intend to extradite Assange?…yeah right, the only reason they would do that is because they don’t have any evidence…why? because the alleged ‘hack’ NEVER happened. The only person they would have had an actionable suit against would have been Seth Rich for leaking, who is now well beyond their grasp. I knew I had just been proven correct and sure enough, here is the confirmation of it now.

      I apologize if I am coming off as a little smug on this issue, but I called it right after hearing about it and doing about an hour of research on day #1, all while idiotic leftists accused me of ‘working for vlad’!…LOL

      I really hope that they reopen and this time do a thorough investigation of Seth Rich’s death. He and his family deserve it.

      Liked by 17 people

      • Rhoda R says:

        And put someone other that Debbie Wasserman-Swhatever’s brother in charge of the investigation.

        Liked by 6 people

      • No apology necessary, and I think a good number of us “knew it” in our gut and then some with a small amount of research. “They” have finally bought into their own bovine scat and believe we aren’t able or capable of doing things on our own.

        Just one of the myriad mistakes that evil has made… and it will cost them.

        The family reaction to it was simply “too odd”, I still wonder what happened there and sure hope we find out.

        Liked by 3 people

        • V says:

          The family reaction – see excerpt from the Butowsky lawsuit:

          “47. On December 17, 2016, at the instigation of Ms. Rattner, Mr. Butowsky finally contacted Joel and Mary Rich, the parents of Seth, and he relayed the information about Ms. Rattner’s meeting with Mr. Assange. During that conversation, Mr. Rich told Mr. Butowsky that he already knew that his sons were involved in the DNC email leak, but he and his wife just wanted to know who murdered Seth. Mr. Rich said he was reluctant to go public with Seth’s and Aaron’s role in leaking the emails because “we don’t want anyone to think our sons were responsible for getting Trump elected.” Mr. Rich said he did not have enough money to hire a private investigator, so Mr. Butowsky offered to pay for one. Mr. Rich accepted the offer and thanked Mr. Butowsky in an email.”

          WOW! So the parents stand by and let the country go through chaos because of their irresponsible, politically-motivated silence.


          Here are my other comments on this subject:

          This is truly huge. Always thought the brother, Aaron Rich, was involved – that would explain why hero Julian Assange didn’t want to name the source even though Seth Rich is dead, it might have endangered Aaron.

          Great respect for Butowsky for his persistence in this. He didn’t have to risk his own life to expose the truth, but he acted.


      • Patrick healy says:

        Well Rachel, well said. You are not the only one. You would need to be blind or a democrat (or over here in Britain) to believe it was the Russians.
        The similarities to the great Climategate e-mail scandal are remarkable
        All the dots can easily be joined, from the Epstein paedophile ring to the Clintons the Skirpel poisioning the corrupt alphabet and five eyes spies Georgo Soros New World Order – I will stop there, but you know the rest.
        If God does not spare President Trump and be looses the next election, the US and the free world will be no more.

        Liked by 1 person

    • Bill Binney and a number of high-ranking professionals in IT said long ago that the forensic analysis of the metadata showed, conclusively, that the hack and the download of DNC info was a local in-house operation. The transfer rate employed in the hack are impossible from 10,000 miles away.

      Liked by 12 people

      • JAS says:

        I concur and I am an analyst with 40 years of experience in these things. But don’t take my word for it. Anyone can test this by copying some files, to the cloud and to a thumb drive. Eye opener.

        Liked by 9 people

    • Washington, DC is one of the most secure/protected cities in the US.Yet with thousands of video cameras on every street corner, including 24 hours satellite coverage and a huge Police Department with all the latest investigative technologies, they can’t get a lead on the Seth Rich murder…’s gone “cold case”. Very peculiar, don’t you think??

      Liked by 2 people

  2. tax2much says:

    Sherlock Holmes has nothing on Sundance. Masterful reporting and analysis as usual.

    Liked by 38 people

  3. snarkybeach says:

    There was no significant Russian interference in the 2016 election, only FBI/CIA small group, coup plotters meddling and spying against the Trump campaign.

    Liked by 29 people

    • mr.piddles says:

      In the Big Picture, the Russians couldn’t be remotely effective in their “meddling”… because DOJ, FBI, CIA, et al were Inside Operators.

      Liked by 11 people

    • A great big H/T to GP for sure, but there is no one (so far and as we know about) that can break these key pieces of information down and put them in the timeline like SD. Efforts that I might add, are as invaluable as the initial new revelation(s).

      Gonna have to hit that donate button again soon. Maybe we should all hit it so that the research/resource coffers are FULL!

      Coming out it is… it’s big, and man is it ugly.

      Liked by 11 people

    • Spatch says:

      Meanwhile, we spent 40 million dollars on hoax from the get go…

      Liked by 5 people

      • Rhoda R says:

        A Fed Prosecutor can’t be brought to account if he is incompetent or corrupt but he /she CAN be brought to account for Fraud, Waste, and Abuse violations. Time to go after the Weissmann/Mueller team for FW&A.

        Liked by 10 people

      • “They” spent, you just PAID. Sickening… and we allow it, even worse.

        Liked by 1 person

        • V says:

          And who are the contractors who were paid $700,000 by the Mueller Special Counsel group? Was Crowdstrike one of them? Was it Crowdstrike who not only put forth the Guccifer 2.0 hoax, but also provided the Mueller team with the data to indict the 12 GRU officers for “hacking the DNC” ?

          If A=B and B=C then A=C

          A – Crowdstrike
          B – Guccifer 2.0 with the planted “Russian fingerprints”
          C – “The Conspirators” alleged by Mueller to be 12 GRU officials posing as Guccifer 2.0

          Crowdstrike’s Shawn Henry, ex-FBI top exec, friend of Mueller, worked under Mueller using a similar false flag setup as Guccifer2.0.


  4. ALEX says:

    Interesting. It will all come down to Assange and if he has does have the proof, then he will release it at the proper time. There’s no doubt he’s considered this scenario and it must be bulletproof.

    He’s always said he won’t give up sources, but if this gets him out of jail, I don’t think he has a choice.

    Liked by 7 people

  5. ElGato says:

    Julian needs the protection of white hats, stat!

    Liked by 9 people

  6. Wysneus says:

    Mueller, CIA and FBI unprecedented lack of curiosity on foundational evidence is ipso facto condemnatory.

    Liked by 13 people

  7. Invisigoth says:

    CNN’s reporting that Julian Assange hacked the 2016 election from the Ecuadorian embassy in London on behalf of Russia.

    Still doesn’t explain why Mueller never interviewed him. He interviewed everyone else!

    Liked by 7 people

  8. Heika says:

    Seth Rich. It all makes far too much sense and always has. Occam’s Razor is slicing and dicing with alacrity and glee on this one.

    Liked by 23 people

  9. Free Speech says:

    Posted on these illustrious boards a couple of years ago. What if . . . the conspiratards are right????

    Liked by 3 people

  10. Louisiana Tea Rose says:

    Roger Stone…..where are you?????

    Liked by 2 people

  11. pyromancer76 says:

    I hope those who murdered (and ordered the murder of) Seth Rich get a judgment of hell on Earth as well as hell for-ever-and-ever in whatever afterlife they are permitted. I have my suspicions.

    I hope all those who have been engaged in the subversion of American law and order get the maximum sentences that the law and American justice allow. And no: “Guilty as sin; free as a bird” for any of them.

    Liked by 5 people

    • deepdivemaga says:

      Keep in mind that this article was written by MICAEL ISIKOFF, the SAME PERSON who wrote articles for Yahoo that ties into the dossier and Carter Page FISA

      Liked by 11 people

      • sarasotosfan says:

        You’d think they would use another stooge besides Isikoff. The guy is a puppet with the controlling hand reaching all the way to the top of his spine. What an embarrassment it would be if he once again wrongly blames Russia.

        Liked by 7 people

    • V says:

      OMG, deepdivemaga, thank you for that link. I’d heard about it but hadn’t bothered to read it till now. Broke out in laughter just reading the first paragraph. And it got worse thereafter.

      Seth was murdered on 10 July 2016 and the Wikileaks release of emails came 12 days later on 22 July 2016. Makes one wonder if this 13 July “SVR” bulletin and are Deepstate vehicles and with backdated entries, given to a gullible or complicit Deborah Sines, the former assistant U.S. attorney in charge of the Rich case until her retirement last year

      This Isikoff damage control attempt (to bolster the lies about Assange & Seth Rich in the Mueller Report) is so amateur, the Russians must be falling off their chairs laughing. Makes US intel look like 1950’s Buck Rogers.


  12. Maquis says:


    Liked by 4 people

  13. Ono says:

    I hope this is the “Genie out of the bottle” moment for the DNC , for the citizens of America, and certainly for the Rich family.

    Long over due

    Liked by 10 people

  14. Eric says:

    And so it begins.
    The end for the few we all want to see pay for the Coup attempt

    Liked by 3 people

  15. Mncpo(ret) says:

    Holy sh@t, this WHOLE scam is coming apart in real time, right before our eyes!!!!

    What a time to be alive!

    Liked by 12 people

  16. sarasotosfan says:

    The DOJ has been criminally negligent with respect to Julian Assange and why no one has been shouting this from the rooftops has bewildered me. Of course, he may well have dirt that the privileged don’t want revealed, but justice is supposed to be blind in seeking the truth.

    Liked by 7 people

    • Rhoda R says:

      Are you kidding? The privileged and their syncopates have pulled the blindfold off of Justice’s eyes and then raped her. She’s cowering in the corner hoping that they won’t make good on their blackmail threat as well.

      Liked by 2 people

  17. Adam says:

    Aaron Rich sued the Washington Times, which had written that he and Seth had sold the emails to Wikileaks. Rich won the lawsuit. Yet, it may be that the WT claim was true.

    Liked by 6 people

  18. StanH says:

    We knew this instinctively. A classic case of Arkincide. Many, many have died in the Clinton orbit.

    Liked by 5 people

  19. MD says:

    If Seth Rich provided the emails to Wikileaks, then it is going to be difficult to say he was killed in a botched robbery. There was a party for the DNC computer people the night he was murdered, walking home from a bar. Was this party an effort to get him in a certain place at a certain time. Who organized / paid for the party? Was it DWS? She was awfully worried about getting her laptop back, did it have info relating to knowledge of this party?

    Liked by 15 people

  20. Johnny says:

    Well that just about puts a death nail in the Bob Mueller’s testimony.

    Will someone please help Bob out from under his desk. He can get up because he is curled in fetal position sucking both thumbs.

    Boy Howdy is Roger Stone ever gonna have a field day with this info. Hot Damn this is one scalding hot summer day for the DC sewer rats.

    I give this 7 out of 10 stars on the fun meter.

    Liked by 13 people

  21. Bogeyfree says:

    The three most powerful lines:

    If this information is true and accurate:

    1. the DOJ claim of a Russian hack –based on assertions by DNC contractor, Crowdstrike– would be entirely false. 

    2. Additionally the DC murder of Seth Rich would hold a far more alarming motive.

    3. the integrity of the DOJ and Special Counsel collapses.

    Liked by 16 people

  22. William w Petty says:

    Has the Seth Rich murder ever been solved. Rhetorical question.

    Liked by 2 people

  23. jeans2nd says:

    Phooey. Everyone knew Wikileaks did not receive those emails from Russia. All that need be done is check the NSA DB. Those emails never showed up in the NSA DB. Anyone with half a brain and a teensy bit of knowledge knew the “Russia-DNC hack” was a lie.

    The only ones who bought the “Russia-DNC hack” lie were gullible Democrat sheeple.

    They really do think we are stoopid.

    Liked by 11 people

  24. doofusdawg says:

    Was waiting for this post after I saw article on TGP. The big question in my mind is does Shine last more than a week in the White House.

    Liked by 1 person

  25. Ken Maritch says:

    I suspect JA will not be with us much longer….


    • Kerry_On says:

      I suspect JA is smart enough to have a “Kill Switch”. If anything untoward happens to him, EVERYTHING gets released to the public. He has TONS more info on the Alphabet agencies that they would NEVER want to see the light of day.

      Liked by 3 people

  26. mr.piddles says:

    “Assange told a U.S. congressman … he can prove the leaked Democratic Party documents … did not come from Russia.”

    Assange HIMSELF said this on Prime Time National Television during an interview with Sean Hannity. Then he mentioned that WikiLeaks has $20,000 for anybody who can provide information on the murder of Seth Rich. Will dig up the clip…

    Liked by 8 people

    • mr.piddles says:

      “HANNITY: Can you say to the American people, unequivocally, that you did not get this information about the DNC, John Podesta’s emails, can you tell the American people 1,000 percent that you did not get it from Russia or anybody associated with Russia?

      JULIAN ASSANGE: Yes. We can say, we have said, repeatedly that over the last two months that our source is not the Russian government and it is not a state party.”

      Lots of detailed question and answer here: (Yay, Sean Hannity!!! :^))

      The Seth Rich comment from Assange was from an earlier interview. Will have to keep digging. Wouldn’t be surprised if I never find it.

      Liked by 4 people

    • mr.piddles says:

      The Seth Rich angle. Still can’t find the interview, but this article says it was conducted by Megan Kelly… I guess I sorta remember that, and maybe I’m mixing up the other Hannity/Assange interview.

      Assange is giving cagey responses, because he INSISTS WikiLeaks will never give up it’s sources (death sentence). But he clearly (IMO) hints at Seth Rich being the source:

      “We’re not saying that Seth Rich’s death necessarily is connected to our publications – that’s something that needs to be established,” said Assange. “But if there is any question about a source of WikiLeaks being threatened, then people can be assured that this organization will go after anyone who may have been involved in some kind of attempt to coerce or possibly, in this kill a potential source.”

      When Kelly asked him if he has any suspicions on who may have murdered Rich, Assange responded, “We have received a variety of information. We will be forwarding that information to the police. I don’t think the information so far is enough to start pointing a direct finger. We don’t want to compromise the police investigation.”

      And then I think it was the WikiLeaks Twitter account that offered $20,000 for information on Rich’s death.

      Liked by 4 people

      • Maquis says:

        “We’re not saying that Seth Rich’s death necessarily is connected to our publications – that’s something that needs to be established,” said Assange

        IE, it’s very possibly so.
        Therefore, a relationship DID exist.


    • mr.piddles says:

      Apparently the original WikiLeaks reward grew substantially…

      Question: why is WikiLeaks SOOO interested in Seth Rich? Do the math.

      Liked by 2 people

    • mr.piddles says:

      Actually this clip from Dutch T.V. was the (or another) interview I was thinking of:

      Interviewer: “What are you suggesting?” (regarding the Rich murder)
      Assange: “I’m suggesting OUR sources… uh… take risks […]”

      Again, cagey on the “sources” thing, but he’s not only protecting WikiLeaks’ integrity, but the safety of their sources:

      “[…] because that we have to understand how high the stakes are in the United States, and that our sources are, you know, our sources face serious risks. That’s why they come to us — so we can protect their anonymity”

      Liked by 3 people

      • Terry says:

        If you watch at 1:02 mark the interviewer asks if rich was one of the sources.

        Watch Assange say nothing but nod twice confirming rich was Wikileaks source.

        Liked by 2 people

        • mr.piddles says:

          Like I said, in all of these interviews he’s very cagey… but yeah, I caught the little nod too. Maybe a coincidence… or maybe an unintended but automatic muscle response from somewhere deep in Assange’s brain. Like when Clapper grabs his earlobe and rubs his forehead without thinking about it.

          Liked by 2 people

  27. Zorro says:

    Who killed Seth Rich? What does Disingenuous Donna Brazile know? Why her move from CNN to Fox along with Paulie Numnuts Ryano?

    Liked by 7 people

  28. Jederman says:

    Mr. Assange needs to prepare for an ED. Not that one an “expedited demise.” Unfortunately, with the stakes so high and the BAMN peeps in control they could do it without having to worry about a thing. The old …move along, nothing to see here… .

    Why is that possible/likely? The “press” is corrupt. They are morally useless. Without any credible watchdog the DS has nothing to fear. Which is why I despise these obedient poodles wandering around in “journalist” costumes, they’re cowards pretending to be something they’re not.

    They obey corporate HQ. Look the other way except when its a non-compliant, normal American making waves. Then have at it.

    Good luck Ms Rattner.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Janie M. says:

      I agree Jederman but I have wondered on occasions if the firey auto “accident” in CA which killed reporter, Michael Hastings, served as a warning to any potential whistle blowing reporters. I don’t know what to think. I realize there are so many pseudo-journalists working at major publications, etc.

      Liked by 1 person

  29. Fishelsea says:

    The lawsuit is a fascinating read.
    Mueller/FBI never inspected the dnc server.
    Mayor of DC declared seth rich murder a botched robbery. No further inquiry.
    Donna brazille and the dnc providing legal services to the rich family.
    FBI has evidence of seth contact with assange. No foia release.
    Lots of crooked bastards listed there.

    Liked by 5 people

  30. Dutchman says:

    This is from GP, and they are purveyors of sensationalist porn, aimed at US, IMHO.
    And, even if accurate it is an ALLEGATION in a court filing.
    Still if this, or Roger Stone, or in any way this foundation is destroyed, the whole thing comes down.

    If Dunham/Durham whatever is really ‘on the case’, HE should have interviewed Assange by now.

    And by the by, IIRC if you follow the link on the above story, I believe it says PDJT did NOT meet with Roerbacher, after R met with Assange.

    That was when muh Russia and Mueller were in full bloom, and meeting wirh him might have been,….problematic.

    If he hasn’t yet, PDJT needs to talk to Pamela Anderson, poste haste!

    Liked by 3 people

    • Johnny says:

      With CNN spinning like a Cuisinart blender, I would say bomber is right over the target

      Liked by 9 people

      • Dutchman says:

        I thought CNN was spinning like a WW2 bomber, with one wing shot off, lol.
        THEY are covering this story? WHAT are they saying, and thanks for taking one for team by watching!

        Liked by 2 people

        • Johnny says:

          I can not stomach CNN.
          I was referencing a post upthread that they were saying that Assange hacked the DNC for Russia.

          I thought it was pretty damn funny.

          How about they were spinning like a one legged man in a butt kicking contest. LOL


          • Dutchman says:

            I am blessed, as I am unable to recieve CNN, and never hang around airports, lol.
            Yeah, thats part of it, too. They have been saying all along assange was affiliated with Russia, without providing any evidence. We’re just supposed to trust them, LOL.


    • livefreeordieguy says:

      I agree 100%, Dutchman… The thought of President Trump calling an emergency one-on-one meeting with Pamela Anderson — and the resultant exploding Moonbat and media heads within the Beltway — is too good to pass up… You can’t make this stuff up!

      Liked by 1 person

      • Dutchman says:

        If she hasn’t talked to him, I suspect she would LIKE to.
        Actually, I had hoped she went to visit him originally ar PDJT’s behest.

        How do you SNEAK someone in, to see Assange? Don’t sneak; have someone who would be the LAST person anyone would expect, walk right in under the klieg lights.
        Dennis Rodman was busy visiting with Kim, so Pamela was second least likely.
        And, I checked; DJT and Anderson HAVE met, in the past and she IS “Pro-Trump”


  31. Zippy says:

    BTW, I can imagine that street robberies could easily be set up by agent provocateurs participating in thug social media. Murder of Seth via “remote control,” not random bad luck.

    Chicago Police Department spokesman Anthony Guglielmi

    “So far this year, the majority of the gun violence we’ve seen are a result of chronic gang conflicts driven in part by social media commentary and petty disputes among rival factions.”

    Liked by 1 person

  32. twingirls (@twingirls49) says:

    And the Anwan family knew to much and that’s why they were allowed to go back to Pakistan. What ever happened to their computers?

    Liked by 2 people

  33. TarsTarkas says:

    I disagree with the ‘death knell’ to the Weissman investigation and the whole coup attempt. The ‘Russians hacked the DNC’ was like the Steele Dossier simply an excuse to justify the investigations into Trump and the Trump campaign. The claim always has been and always will be that the election prevention/coup was justified because of the belief (whether real or feigned, IMO more likely the latter) that Trump was a Russian Asset.


  34. BobBoxBody says:

    And this is Monday. The week’s just beginning….

    Liked by 5 people

  35. Bogeyfree says:

    This alone if true should be more than enough IMO for AG Barr to “decide to prosecute” some of his own for once!

    Unbelievable if Barr sweeps this revelation if true, under the rug.

    Think about this:

    1) The FBI never confiscated the DNC servers which represented major evidence in an alleged crime.

    2) The FBI knowingly took the word from outsiders on what happened to the DNC Server.

    3) A person presumed to be closely associated with the DNC is killed just days after DNC emails are released.

    This truly calls for a full scale investigation into those who fabricated this whole DNC server and Russian hacking fraud!

    WAKE UP Mr. Barr and try to uphold the rule of law and your oath of office!

    Liked by 5 people

  36. WSB says:

    Look how many people KNEW about this !!!!!!!!!!!! Julian Assange, Bill Shine and Party, Seth’s PARENTS of all people. They did not even want to know how Seth died because of their hatred for Donald Trump and they didn’t want people to think Seth and his brother had anything to do with Donald Trump winning?!!!!!!!.

    All of these people were aiding and abetting a coup against the United States for 3 years, and they did NOTHING!!!!!

    Here is Ty Clevenger’s denied FOIA request back in October 2018. John Chapman at the NSA said there was classified info, so none of the doc’s could be released.

    Liked by 4 people

    • Hal_S says:

      I believe that the FOIA court appeal to obtain this NSA information is going to have a preliminary ruling in a few weeks. That ALSO explains Isakoff’s attempt to get out ahead of a story.

      Liked by 2 people

  37. LBH says:

    This also explains SR’s parents going radio silent so abruptly. If I lost one son and another was implicated, I’d shut up, too. But things are looking brighter. It’s all coming out. The “powers that be” can’t keep this genie in the bottle.

    Liked by 7 people

    • WSB says:

      Yes, but not for the reasons you think…

      “During that conversation, Mr. Rich told Mr. Butowsky that he already knew that his sons were involved in the DNC email leak, but he and his wife just wanted to know who murdered Seth. Mr. Rich said he was reluctant to go public with Seth’s and Aaron’s role in leaking the emails because “we don’t want anyone to think our sons were responsible for getting Trump elected.”


      So, the country has been through Hell for THREE years because they had issues.

      Liked by 7 people

      • Old School says:

        If being loathed by Trump-haters was their primary reason to push for a shutdown of the investigation into their son’s murder, then how could anyone have sympathy for Riches?

        Liberalism is more than a mental disorder; it’s evil.

        Liked by 7 people

      • Rhoda R says:

        I suspect that was just the cover excuse. The real reason was that they got a phone call about Aaron.

        Liked by 9 people

        • livefreeordieguy says:

          Oh man… a threat against son #2 may well shut them up and send Hannity and everybody else away very quickly…. could well be, Rhoda…

          Liked by 2 people

      • pocaMAGAjunta says:

        Your son was murdered by cold blooded killers. But “we don’t want anyone to think our sons were responsible for getting Trump elected.”

        Unconscionable. Protecting the murderers of their son for the sake of politics and what their friends might think.

        TDS is real and so much worse than I could ever have imagined.

        Liked by 1 person

        • WSB says:

          Isn’t that the strangest thing you have ever heard? Many think this was a screen. However, this sounds like so many weird people I have spoken to in the last few years…


          • V says:

            I wouldn’t be surprised if Ed Butowsky has the parents recorded on tape. This is in quotation marks in the lawsuit: Paragraph 47:

            “we don’t want anyone to think our sons were responsible for getting Trump elected.”

            IIRC it was Ed Butowsky who secretly recorded Sy Hersh’s phone call re Seth Rich.

            Liked by 1 person

  38. Mncpo(ret) says:

    Please, Last Refuge, tweet this. It will blow up the interwebs. No lie.

    Liked by 3 people

  39. JustScott says:

    But, But, But…

    “WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange used the Ecuadorean embassy as a command centre for hacking to undermine the 2016 US Presidential Election, new documents have revealed.”

    “UC Global, a private Spanish security company”…” said Mr Assange met Russians and established hackers during his time at the embassy, often for several hours.

    The report said he personally managed some of the leaks of Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s private emails directly from the embassy, which the Mueller report concluded was part of an attempt to undermine the 2016 election.

    The report concluded there was “no doubt that there is evidence” that Mr Assange had ties to Russian intelligence agencies.”

    Sourcing attributed to: CNN

    (Sorry, I will not damage my IQ by looking for the CNN source article.)

    So, they are now claiming the Russians didn’t do it, Assange did, but Assange met Russians and preferred Russian salad dressing?

    Liked by 3 people

    • JustScott says:

      Sorry, missed Invisigoth’s post above. That CNN article is definitely DEFCON-10.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Matt Hay says:

      Met Russians while he was the most surveilled guy in he universe. I am sure the Embassy has a list of his Russian visitors?

      Liked by 4 people

    • Zorro says:

      How nice for this information to also come out. Why didn’t Super Spook John Brennan sniff this out?

      Liked by 2 people

    • V says:

      Quoting from JustScott’s above, from link attributed to CNN:

      “The report said he [Assange] personally managed some of the leaks of Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s private emails directly from the embassy, which the Mueller report concluded was part of an attempt to undermine the 2016 election.”

      Again, the Deepstate is deliberately conflating DNC emails/Podesta emails with Hillary Clinton emails. Wikileaks released DNC emails on 22 July 2016, Podesta emails Oct thru Nov 2016.

      When Wikileaks published Clinton emails it was FROM THE STATE DEPT, not hacked. WL published them in searchable form. So, the above paragraph – “managed some of the leaks…” is utterly false.

      “Hillary Clinton Email Archive
      On March 16, 2016 WikiLeaks launched a searchable archive for over 30 thousand emails & email attachments sent to and from Hillary Clinton’s private email server while she was Secretary of State. The 50,547 pages of documents span from 30 June 2010 to 12 August 2014. 7,570 of the documents were sent by Hillary Clinton. The emails were made available in the form of thousands of PDFs by the US State Department as a result of a Freedom of Information Act request. More PDFs were made available on February 29, 2016, and a set of additional 995 emails was imported up to February 2, 2018.”


  40. Sentient says:

    The president should ignore Pompeo and his opinion that Wikileaks is a “non-state hostile Intelligence service” and give Assange a full and unconditional pardon. The problem is getting him away from the Brits and out of the reach of the CIA before they kill him.

    Liked by 10 people

    • Suzanne says:

      if Assange is smart he set up a dead man’s switch type thing years ago to be released upon his death from anything… even something lyingly reported as being from natural causes.
      the Rich family may have shut up because they were threatened with their other son’s death if they didn’t. I have long thought that the only reason Andrew Breitbart’s widow didn’t challenge the ridiculous autopsy findings done on her husband was to protect her children.

      Liked by 3 people

  41. Zorro says:

    Who will Sean Hannity interrupt while they are trying to relay this story? Then Hannity will go to commercial and come back with a new segment.

    Liked by 3 people

  42. wwwrobotC says:

    Salute to Sundance.

    Liked by 5 people


    I worked on Dana’s campaign this past midterm. I was at a fundraiser in Laguna Niguel and after most of the people had left, a few of us and Dana were sitting around talking. I asked him point blank privately about who Assange got the emails from. He looked me sqaure in the eyes and said, “Seth Rich”.

    This whole charade is going to fall apart. When history is written, it will be seen as the biggest crime in US history.

    Liked by 17 people

  44. Who didn’t already believe this?

    Liked by 3 people

  45. Summer says:

    “Assisted by his brother Aaron.”

    Now that is interesting. Where is this Aaron and would he confirm or deny the allegations?

    Tried to read the court filing but hopelessly lost track amidst “he said she said” and did not finish reading, sorry. Sounds more like a defamation lawsuit than anything else.

    Liked by 2 people

  46. Jive Pawnbroker says:


  47. Bogeyfree says:

    Does this info, if true give PT and AG Barr even more reason to extradite Assange to the US for protection and a deep dive debriefing of what he knows and any evidence he has on this DNC/Seth Rich issue?

    I expect a PT tweet on this article by tomorrow am.

    Liked by 4 people

    • islandpalmtrees says:

      Good question except AG Barr is reportedly CIA. Is this a case of inviting the fox in to protect the chicken?


  48. NJF says:

    C’mon guys Seth Rich was obviously a Russian spy! His name is one of the redacted ones in the FISA app. 🤣🤣


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s