The foundation for the Russian election interference narrative is built on the claim of Russians hacking the servers of the Democrat National Committee (DNC), and subsequently releasing damaging emails that showed the DNC worked to help Hillary Clinton and eliminate Bernie Sanders.
Despite the Russian ‘hacking’ claim the DOJ previously admitted the DNC would not let FBI investigators review the DNC server. Instead the DNC provided the FBI with analysis of a technical review done through a cyber-security contract with Crowdstrike.
The narrative around the DNC hack claim was always sketchy; many people believe the DNC email data was downloaded onto a flash drive and leaked. In a court filing (full pdf below) the scale of sketchy has increased exponentially.
Suspecting they could prove the Russian hacking claim was false, lawyers representing Roger Stone requested the full Crowdstrike report on the DNC hack. When the DOJ responded to the Stone motion they made a rather significant admission. Not only did the FBI not review the DNC server, the FBI/DOJ never even saw the Crowdstrike report.
Yes, that is correct. The FBI and DOJ were only allowed to see a “draft” report prepared by Crowdstrike, and that report was redacted… and that redacted draft is the “last version of the report produced”; meaning, there are no unredacted & final versions.
Whiskey-Tango-Foxtrot!
This means the FBI and DOJ, and all of the downstream claims by the intelligence apparatus; including the December 2016 Joint Analysis Report and January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment, all the way to the Weissmann/Mueller report and the continued claims therein; were based on the official intelligence agencies of the U.S. government and the U.S. Department of Justice taking the word of a hired contractor for the Democrat party….. despite their inability to examine the server and/or actually see an unredacted technical forensic report from the investigating contractor.
The entire apparatus of the U.S. government just took their word for it…
…and used the claim therein as an official position….
…which led to a subsequent government claim, in court, of absolute certainty that Russia hacked the DNC.
Think about that for a few minutes.
The full intelligence apparatus of the United States government is relying on a report they have never even been allowed to see or confirm; that was created by a paid contractor for a political victim that would not allow the FBI to investigate their claim.
The DNC server issue is foundation, and cornerstone, of the U.S. government’s position on “Russia hacking” and the election interference narrative; and that narrative is based on zero factual evidence to affirm the U.S. government’s position.
…”the government does not need to prove at the defendant’s trial that the Russians hacked the DNC”… (pg 3)
Ridiculous.
You couldn’t make this nonsense up if you tried…
Here’s the full filing (h/t Techno Fog) :
.
The Treehouse and Sundances amazing analysis is being used on “Sundays with Charles” .Jason Goodman and Charles Ortel have HT the “Last Refuge” several times.
Go to “Crowdsource the Truth” for more amazing exposure of the cabal all backed up with links.
His platform is on patreon or subscriberstar, but the show is on YouTube “Sundays with Charles”.
Jason Goodmans channel.
Sorry I can’t post link w/my ☎
LikeLike
I am curious as to whether Crowdstrike mentioned her Pakistani IT guy Awan?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sundance The father of Crowdstrike’s founder Dmitri Alperovitch, who is aka Shawn Henry
( https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/a49902/the-russian-emigre-leading-the-fight-to-protect-america/ ) was born in Russia and was reputed to be one of Russia’s top hackers.
He the father of Dmitri, MIchael Alperovitch was being sent to clean up in Chernobyl and suddenly he was whisked away to Canada and became a CIA asset.
Pulling CrowdStrike’s troika is the CIA, FBI, and Michael Alpernovitch or “Papa Bear”
https://brassballs.blog/home/cia-and-fbi-and-hillary-clinton-use-crowdstrike-software-to-tap-and-collect-and-sell-surveillance-information
Crowdstrike planted the malware on DNC systems, which they conveniently discovered later. See this piece for evidence
https://disobedientmedia.com/2017/12/fancy-frauds-bogus-bears-malware-mimicry/
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thank you for your articles. I look forward to reading them.
LikeLike
I don’t understand this “many people believe the DNC email data was downloaded onto a flash drive and leaked” Technically, it’s the ONLY way the data could have been downloaded at the speeds it was in fact downloaded at. They couldn’t have been downloaded remotely at the speeds they were downloaded at. So unless Putin or a Putin look-a-like was wearing Seth Rich’s clothes that day……
LikeLiked by 1 person
The Russian Hacking narrative never made sense. I called BS on it two years ago.
https://www.avoiceofliberty.us/2017/05/the-great-russian-hacking-hoax.html
LikeLike
So, basically, Obama’s FBI simply accepted at face value the DNC’s propaganda and ran with it.
Seems to be a pattern.
LikeLike