For months, the so-called “coalition of the willing” led by Great Britain, France and Germany, have been proposing a multinational group of peacekeepers on the ground in Ukraine – supported by U.S. military. However, after President Trump asserted he would not support a U.S. troop presence in Ukraine, things got sticky.
Without the U.S. military, the NATO members were not willing to put their troops into the meat grinder buffer zone between Russian and Ukrainian forces. The U.K, France and Germany continually demanded U.S. troops as protection, just in case things escalated. This insurance approach was expanded by Ukrainian President Zelenskyy who coined the term, “security guarantee” to encapsulate the EU demand.
However, President Trump cuts the Gordian knot in the “ceasefire plan,” by eliminating the “ceasefire plan.”
Instead, President Trump goes directly to a peace agreement, and somehow the EU members agreed to it. There will be no negotiation for a ceasefire; instead there will be immediate negotiations for a long-term peace agreement.
PRESIDENT TRUMP – “A great and very successful day in Alaska! The meeting with President Vladimir Putin of Russia went very well, as did a late-night phone call with President Zelenskyy of Ukraine, and various European Leaders, including the highly respected Secretary General of NATO. It was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere Ceasefire Agreement, which often times do not hold up. President Zelenskyy will be coming to D.C., the Oval Office, on Monday afternoon. If all works out, we will then schedule a meeting with President Putin. Potentially, millions of people’s lives will be saved. Thank you for your attention to this matter!” (link)
President Trump does not publicly point out that the shift in plan negates the need for a ceasefire security force, but the reality is inside the unspoken change. A very smart and strategic approach that appears to have flown under the radar.
WASHINGTON – U.S. President Donald Trump has won the support of Western partners for his bid to end the war in Ukraine, with European capitals voicing their approval following his high-stakes talks with Russia’s Vladimir Putin in Alaska.
Trump spoke with top EU leaders on Saturday morning after the bilateral summit on Friday appeared to end without an agreement.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen also took part in the telephone conversation, alongside Trump’s special envoy Steve Witkoff and U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio.
French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, Finland’s Alexander Stubb, Poland’s Karol Nawrocki and Italy’s Giorgia Meloni were confirmed by Brussels to have joined. A second call was then held by the European leaders without Zelenskyy and the Americans to discuss the situation.
In a statement, Zelenskyy said that he had a “long and substantive” conversation with Trump, initially one-on-one, before other leaders were invited to take part. “We support President Trump’s proposal for a trilateral meeting between Ukraine, the U.S. and Russia,” he said, adding that he will travel to Washington on Monday to meet with Trump.
“As envisioned by President Trump, the next step must now be further talks including President Zelenskyy, whom he will meet soon,” the group of European countries represented on the call said in a statement. “We are also ready to work with President Trump and President Zelenskyy towards a trilateral summit with European support.” (read more)
Zelenskyy will be in Washington DC on Monday afternoon for a talk with President Trump. In that meeting, we anticipate President Trump telling Zelenskyy that the general terms of the ‘peace agreement’ will be to include the permanent loss of territory in exchange for something we do not yet know.

Eric Daugherty
@EricLDaugh
🚨 WTF? Just one day after President Trump’s meeting with Putin, Senator Lindsey Graham is floating that he will introduce a bill to designate RUSSIA as a state sponsor of TERRORISM, with Senator Blumenthal.
Cont…
The usual suspects. Lindsey Graham and DaNang Dick.
They must have really good blackmail on miss lindsey!
AND BOTH ARE USELESS AS…
No. He’s not.
He’s strengthening Trump’s hand.
I don’t trust either of them.
If I live long enough I will celebrate the day this XXXXXXXX man leaves office or croaks.
How does this benefit Lindsey and why is he is openly horrible?
Lindsey’s self appointed role as the voice of conservatism is jeopardized by the Trump presidency. The good senator has been marginalized and needs to be fired by the people of SC.
Hey, Graham — get the heck out of the way!! You are not our President!
President Trump needs to put Lindsey in a corner with a dunce cap on his head.
wonder what senators will meet with Z before Z meets with POTUS?
Amy Klobachar, Lynsey, Blumenthal, et al?
Should be zero. President Trump should arrange it that nobody meets or talks to Z before he arrives at the White House
As a data point, senators who met with Zelensky prior to previous oval office meeting:
D’s – Klobachar, Rosen, Blumenthal, Murphy, Welch, Whitehouse, Van Hollen, Coons
R’s – Graham, Wicker, Grassley
May have missed a couple?? But any of them meeting with that—- (Insert your preferred opprobrium) —-, should be called out.
Not to mention Lindsey’s trips to Ukraine years ago with John McCain. trying to stir the pot for war.
Anyone seen Boris Johnson around?
Screwing up a formal peace agreement is a lot harder to get away with than screwing up a ceasefire, so even though it’s to be expected that zelenskyy will find a way to sabotage anything he agrees to, the President’s plan does appear to box the little dirtbag in a little tighter than before.
Probably the big tell as to how squirrely he’ll get will be whether he shows up Monday in his jammies… or in sweats… or in disguise, i.e. wearing a business suit.
At some point somebody’s gonna hafta deal with him, as in put him out of sabotage range, ’cause his track record clearly indicates there’s no do-right in him.
𝐃𝐔𝐓𝐂𝐇
@pr0ud_americans
🚨BREAKING: Michael Smerconish says President Trump deserves the Nobel Peace Prize if he brokers a peace deal between Ukraine and Russia that Ukraine accepts. This as Trump pushes for negotiations, with a proposed meeting in Alaska. Even CNN acknowledges the potential impact.
Video linked….
Waiting for the next counter offensive from the NeoCons IC
It may now be advantageous for the Russiagate Hoaxer crowd to elevate Trump, secure the peace in Ukraine , and hope a mollified Trump will let them escape justice.
The peace will not last any longer than Trump’s term in office if this happens.
.@SecRubio previews tomorrow’s White House meeting with President Zelensky and other European leaders: “A lot of it will be centered around what are the kinds of security guarantees that Ukraine is looking for.”
President Trump: “President Putin agreed that Russia would accept security guarantees for Ukraine ”
_____
@POTUS outlines the points that will be discussed in today’s meeting with President Zelensky and European leaders, including potential security guarantees and territorial exchanges: “I’m optimistic that, collectively, we can reach an agreement.”
m optimistic that, collectively, we can reach an agreement.”
AI Overview
The assertion that “President Putin agreed that Russia would accept security guarantees for Ukraine” was made by Donald Trump in the context of recent discussions about ending the Russia-Ukraine war.
This statement follows a meeting between Trump and Putin in Alaska.
According to US envoy Steve Witkoff, Putin’s agreement would allow the United States and European allies to offer Ukraine security guarantees resembling NATO’s Article 5, which outlines a collective defense mandate.
NBC News reports that these discussions are ongoing and the details of who would provide what guarantees are still being considered.
It is important to note that Putin has historically opposed Ukraine joining NATO.
This reported agreement to “Article 5-like” protection is viewed as a potentially significant shift in Russia’s stance and could be a way to move forward without full NATO membership for Ukraine.
According to the BBC, Russia’s agreement to security guarantees was a concession made during the talks.
While Trump expressed optimism about reaching an agreement that would deter future aggression against Ukraine, Reuters notes that it remains unclear exactly what form these security guarantees would take and what role each participating nation would play.