In his own words, Senator James Lankford says if President Trump was president today the border crisis would not exist, because the existing law would be enforced. Simultaneous to this, the same Senator Lankford says the new law he proposes will create significant border enforcement.
If the executive branch can ignore the current border enforcement law (they can and do), what makes Lankford believe new legislation will not be ignored by the same executive branch (they will)? This non-pretending reality frames the essential point: the element of “enforcement” is not within the legislative branch, so the entire effort is a moot exercise. WATCH:
Margaret Brennan is especially annoying in this interview.
[Transcript] – MARGARET BRENNAN: And we’re joined now by Oklahoma Republican James Lankford. He’s in Oklahoma City this morning. Good morning to you, sir, it has taken you two months to get this bipartisan deal. Do you have the support of your fellow Republicans to actually vote this through?
SEN. JAMES LANKFORD: Well, actually, I wish it would have taken only two months. It’s taken about four months to be able to go through this, we started in October. Everyone’s looking to be able to read the bill at this point. That’s the key aspect, we’re working on the final aspects of it to try to be able to get it out. So everyone can get a chance to read it. Right now, they’re all functioning off of internet rumors of what’s in the bill, and many of them are false. So people want to be able to just see it, read it and go through it. And to be able to see the dramatic change that this really makes and how we handle our immigration system, and how we work to be able to secure our border completely. That’s been the simple request of Americans, whether you’re Republican, Democrat, or independent, people just want a secure border, where we have legal immigration, but we’re not promoting illegal immigration. And that’s what we’ve seen in the last three years.
MARGARET BRENNAN: So you don’t have a vote count yet?
SEN. LANKFORD: Do not have a vote count yet on this because everybody’s got to be able to read it to be able to go through. But I do feel very positive about it because even the initial feedback has been good.
MARGARET BRENNAN: So you just heard the details laid out there by our immigration correspondent, how do you balance the shutdown power that would be in these new authorities versus the right to claim asylum?
SEN. LANKFORD: Yeah, this is similar to what we had to under Title 42, during the pandemic time period, where we reach a crisis point to say we can’t actually operate. So we don’t have that authority. Right now, as the United States, we’ve reached crisis points. For instance, when we got four or 5,000 people crossing the border, we can no longer process those individuals. So right now, the Biden administration is just releasing them into the country. That’s what’s driving the mayors in Denver, in Chicago, in New York City and other places around the country crazy to say, when the border gets crowded, you just release them to our cities, and it causes all the chaos in these cities. This is a new authority to say, when we can no longer detain and deport, when we can’t process the people and actually make a decision right there at the border, then we’ll actually turn those folks back around to Mexico and say, “We can no longer do this.” That gives the authority to the United States into law enforcement, rather than the authority, just the criminal cartels. Right now. The cartels can just rush our border, they’ll get through as many people as they want to be able to get through. We can not have criminal organizations running our southern border, we have to be able to run our southern border.
MARGARET BRENNAN: So parole authority has been a sticking point for Republicans throughout. I know the administration has used it in a novel way to resettle 1 million people. So how are you changing that authority?
SEN. LANKFORD: Yeah, humanitarian parole is still- is still an issue for us. But it’s been an authority that every President has had to have basic humanitarian parole, but as you mentioned, this administration has used humanitarian parole in a way no other administration has. They’ve said, if you’ll just tell us in advance that you’re coming, come to a port of entry, the first day you get here, we’ll hand you a work permit, and we’ll release you into the country under parole. Well, that’s actually attracting more people, of course, people from around the world are going to want an American work permit to show up. So instead of deterring immigration, they’re literally incentivizing illegal immigration,. They’re handing people a parole and a work permit day one. That has to stop, we can’t just have a system where we have that. In between the ports of entries, when it gets crowded, they’ll just release them under a parole authority there. And they’re just released in the country. We don’t know if they qualify for asylum. We don’t know where they are. By the hundreds of thousands people are just being released in the country. And we have no tracking on them at all. That has to stop. This is a national security issue for us. May I remind you that we’ve had 50 people come across our border that we’ve interdicted, that are on the terror watch list. Just in the past four months, we’ve had tens of thousands of people that came across our border that were identified as a national security risk. Those individuals should not just be waived into the country.
MARGARET BRENNAN: So the conservative Wall Street Journal editorial board called this the best chance in years to fix asylum law and parole loophole. But Donald Trump, who is the front runner to be your party’s nominee in 2024 is telling Republicans not to support this. Here’s what he said last night in Las Vegas.
(SOUND ON TAPE)
FORMER PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: A lot of the senators are trying to say respectfully they’re blaming going to me– I said that’s okay. Please blame it on me, please, because they were getting ready to pass a very bad bill. And I’ll tell you what a bad bill is– I’d rather have no bill than a bad bill.
(END SOUND ON TAPE)
MARGARET BRENNAN: Can you get this passed without Donald Trump’s approval?
SEN. LANKFORD: Well, I’m looking forward to President Trump having the opportunity to be able to read it like everybody else. There’s a lot of misinformation out there right now that I hear this comment that it waives in 5,000 people, it hands out work permits that- all those things are not true. There’s just a lot of internet rumors that are running around on this right now. We’re looking forward to getting the information out and I can say, there is no question no matter what your political persuasion is, we would not have had the immigration crisis we’re experiencing right now, if President Trump would have been president the last three years. There’s no way we would have had 8 million people illegally cross our border, because he would enforce those different authorities and would have made sure that we actually secure a border. But even while he was president, he was specifically asking Congress to change the standard on asylum to be able to tighten up, to be able to give them additional funds for deportation. All of those things are in this bill. So if he were to be president, this would be new authorities that he had actually asked for when he was president before.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Right. And I just- you just said that he has not read this bill. He doesn’t essentially know what he’s talking about. So this deal–
Sen. Lankford: — Well, I’m not saying that. I’m just saying there’s just a lot of rumors that are out there about the bill. And I want to make sure everyone has a chance to be able to read it before they make a final judgment.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Right. So the deal you just said would give any future president and the current one new authorities. So on the trail, Trump has vowed to block legal immigrants based on their beliefs to end birthright citizenship, to carry out mass deportations, and he has not ruled out separating kids from their parents. Would you trust Donald Trump with these new authorities?
SEN. LANKFORD: I would actually because these are not only new authorities that had been asked for by multiple presidents, whether it be President Trump, President Obama, President Bush before that, this is a basic thing that we have to have for our national security. When we talk about asylum, right now you cross the border, and you literally say, I have fear in my country, and you’re released into the United States and await a 10-year hearing. No one thinks that actually makes sense to have a 10-year backlog for just saying the magic words. I have fear in my country. We don’t really know if they qualify for asylum. We don’t know their criminal record. We don’t know anything else about it. That absolutely has to change. That’s been an issue for a very long time that changes this in law.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, we will have to see where we are on the vote count. But I want to ask you, back in 2022, Donald Trump endorsed your reelection. And in that endorsement, he said, “James Lankford is strong on the border.” Has anything changed with your thoughts about endorsing Donald Trump for president?
SEN. LANKFORD: No, it hasn’t at all. Obviously, he’s been very engaged, as I’ve mentioned already on it, none of the things that are happening in the last three years in the border would have happened if Donald Trump was actually president. He knows I’ve been very passionate about the border. This is an issue I’ve worked on for a very long time. He and I worked together when he was in the White House on some of his border policies. And when he did his big proposal, that was a legislative proposal, because again, President Trump proposed new laws and new issues on this, because we know that we have gaps in the system. So if you want to be able to secure the border, you can have President Trump to be able to come in to actually secure the border, because he’s going to focus in on that. But if he comes in and is elected by the American people to come this November, he’s going to want these additional authorities in this because it will help every president from here on out.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Yeah, but you’re not endorsing him?
SEN. LANKFORD: I actually haven’t endorsed anyone on it. But he’d be a much better president than what we’re dealing with right now, definitely on national security.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Okay. Before I let you go, I want to get your reaction to the news that he was ordered to pay $83 million to a person that a jury found he defamed after a separate jury found that he had sexually assaulted her. Does it give you any pause about him returning to office?
SEN. LANKFORD: It doesn’t. Obviously, these are legal cases. I don’t want to jump in the middle of a legal case. It’s been interesting the number of legal cases that have come up against President Trump and then have failed and had been dropped or had been kicked out of the courts on it. This one’s actually went through. He’s already said he’s going to challenge it. So let the courts actually make their decisions and let the American people make their decisions. We got states like Colorado that are trying to be able to block the people of Colorado from being able to choose who they vote for. Let the American people decide this in November.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, the Supreme Court might decide on that one. We will have to leave it there for today, James Lankford. We will be focusing on what progress you were able to make. We’ll be back in just one minute.
Skip the proposed law, fast forward to election and return of Trump.
Maybe it’s just me but when I visit a foreign country and a guy with a gun and badge says I can’t proceed, I stop. How much does it cost to announce the border is closed? (Trillions)
Exactly
Similar to Toronto’s new mayor, millions$$ for the illegal aliens in that city, however another no pay raise for Law Enforcement. What is wrong with this picture? We see you Olivia Chow!! Oh NDP leader of the big city. Odjebi and those that voted or installed you, bijotch!
Vrlo dobro.
Maybe we should bus ours from the southern border to the northern border and release them there. Isn’t that what Mexico is doing now?
does anyone believe these people anymore?
does the interviewer or the interviewee believe it?
does the audience? the voters
the TV networks need to have their licenses stripped the spectrum reallocated by lottery to new groups
No.
No.
No.
No, Ne, Njet, Nein!!
well, we believe these people are total idiots, but find it hard to believe they are so unselfconsious that they pridefully go on National broadcast television, to display their idiocy for the whole world to see.
Remove their forked tongues and citizenship. These creatures have sold their soul and shouldn’t be allowed in America. Yet this is our representation? I want my TAX $ back!!!
Yes I was just going to say incredulously that wow we pay these guys out of our hard earned paychecks? Makes me sick
Their forced tounges
Not only do they think we are all a bunch of ignorant rubes but they also don’t even try and conceal their contempt for those they are supposed to represent. His explanation makes about as much sense as a Joe Biden remark.
On another note the Gatestone Institute has an excellent article about the “Terrorists of Tomorrow are Blocking Traffic Today.” Outstanding in-depth explanation almost on par with one Sundance would write.
When they sniffed the air during Covid and saw how docile most are, their contempt and hubris for everyday Americans went off the charts. People didn’t even know the difference in a mandate and a law. And they found that out.
So true. I know many not born in Canada or USA knew the difference, but could not figure out why citizens were complying, not all but as Trudope would say”fringe minority”, my guzica!!
Lankford is a gun for hire…probably Soros or Bezos, one for the voters the other for the workers and driving down wages. I hope Johnson doesn’t cave
“I hope Johnson doesn”t cave” sounds like you think he doesn’t want something, but might be persuaded, pressured or forced.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but Johnston works for, and takes orders from the same people as McCarthy and McConnell, and it ain’t us.
Its not caving to do exactly what he was installedas Speaker to do.
Maybe if an insurrection was declared on the border they would do something besides finding creative ways to fund their kick backs.
If future Republic voters were flooding across the border, it would have been permanently closed upon point of death three years ago.
So…he won’t say he endorses PDJT.
He will….
Just wait and see…
Who cares? The bloom is off the rose now – we know who this guy is (I have relatives in OK and they are PISSED!!! And have let Lankford know exactly how they feel). He will be primaried.
Yeah, he’s got 4 more years if he was up for election in 2022. Do Okies have long memories? I hope and pray!
We do. Yes we do.
He doesn’t. It is clearly apparent.
They have to pretend like they’re can and are doing something. Besides they must find some way to push through the funding for Ukraine. There are trillions at stake.
.
An excuse to supply the Ukraine flush fund. Bingo.
.
Accurate assessment.
Rather than passing more legislation, how about Lankford and his RINO buddies all threaten to throw a tantrum and hold their breaths until Biden enforces the current law? And then actually follow through on that one.
I’d be happy to hold his breath for him.
Duct tape does wonders.
My friend, your happiness means a lot to me!
A delightfully worded response!
Way to go Maquis!!
I’ll hold him down, muley can help , while you apply the tape!
tree-umvirate! lets roll.
As has been pointed out here many times these people have to pretend that they don’t know something in order to make these decisions!
Exactly what I commented on the previous post. The lawless regime isn’t going to follow the law anyway so this is a pointless exercise
IMO, the border issue needs to stay in the news. The less prosperous citizens of our country are the ones who are hurt most. They need to be reminded that Lunch Bucket Joe is not on their side.
Simple Stupid:
Close the damn border
.
He wants PDJT to read the bill. Is that legal?Another indictment in the making? How many pages in the bill? How much for Ukraine buried in there? This scum bag gives me a migraine 😫
Agreed Diceanna, creepy sounding, creepy looking.
I hope the censure sticks and other states follow suit in removing GOP support for those who would allow even ONE illegal in.
He’s a lying rino
Can you imagine saying 150,000
A month is ok?
We would have ove 500 million people. 3/4 not American
Agree with your comment.
I would like to expand, from the past years to current day, the number of illegals are way more than 5 million, 10 million or even 20 million.
There is no doubt there has to be at minimum 30-50 million illegals living here and many are taking money from you and me.
Now, I am greatly offended and very, very angry.
One day, sooner rather than later, the American people will rue the day, they wanted open borders.
Remember illegals do NOT love this country and do NOT assimilate.
Open Ellis Island.
Is he???
’Cause I’m not so sure?
I’ve listened to him and Cong. (Speaker) Mike Johnson for years, now.
I believe they are both men intent on serving and honoring The Lord… The One True God
However, DC is a soul-corrupting place. So, I never dismiss it’s wicked affect on good men.
And, I understand it’s sausage they’re making, not filet mignon.
There’s so very much that I don’t have clear insight on that, it’s hard to know for sure?
That’s why I keep praying for these guys…. and praying against “the darkness” they face.
.
Is he? Yes he is.
By the way, he’s not in Congress to “serve the Lord”. He’s in Congress to serve the United States. If he isn’t going to do that job, then he needs to resign.
.
Amin Amen!!
Keep praying and even though you can’t see clearly, some of us can.
They are both corrupt and chameleon Christians.
They need your prayers more than most.
Again, as so many have posited on this site – do they really think we are that stupid?????
yes ..they think we are stupid as about all demo c RATS…..
Yes, they do. Hillary even said it; I don’t have link but it is a popular video clip.
The U.S. has many destructive and dangerous Senators.
This guy has always struck me as one of the worst…his entire demeanour reeks of slime.
When I first started following the rise of President Trump this guy always struck me as “ stealth slime”
Cheers, and please primary this clown.
Agree along with Cornyn{sp} imo,!
Cornyn is not “stealth” slime, just slime.
uh…..this is another beauty I would like see to be forcefully remove….
I am not confident of ONE uncorrupted MAGA Senator.
Not ONE,…out of 100.
McConnell has UNLIMITED campaign funding available, to fund primary opponents or to corrupt any who should win election.
He controls the ethics committee, and so can Santos them.
And he does NOT want ANY MAGA, dirtying up HIS Senate.
👍
“Margaret Brennan is especially annoying in this interview.” Good thing there is a transcript! 😂
I read the transcript. Took SD advice….😁
I listened.
Suspect the neighbors heard my retorts to that contemptuous twit.
Next time you’ll listen to SD’s hint.😉
“Margaret Brennan IS especially annoying.”
LOL….when ISN’T she especially annoying ?!?!?!
“The border is like the highway. More and more drivers are ignoring speed limits. So it is obvious- we need more signs to stop the speeding…in Spanish.”
-Sen. Lankyford
No! You just need to enforce the speed laws and pull the offenders over. Easy Peasy. 🚨🚔👮♂️🚓🚨
BS!
.
Bad analogy. Here’s the analogy: None of the drivers have driver licenses. Shut down the road, arrest every single one, and boot them all back to where they came from.
.
Strange, yet when we go out of country overseas hubby needs to get an International License, even the country he was born in?? Yes he pays here. I would not dare drive there, especially the autobahn.
Dig a trench across the road, 3′ wide, 3′ deep, with spikes mounted in the bottom of it.
Punch a hole in their oil pan.
No. You and many others here completely miss the point. The analogy is how Lankford would propose to solve the speeding “problem.” Lankford is not concerned with fixing anything.
Border crossers know they are crossing the border illegally and the Justice Department looks the other way refusing to enforce the law. Neither side cares what the laws are. They just gaslight the public and pretend they want to fix the “problem.” It’s much like blaming gun violence on guns or auto accidents on SUVs.
Your analogy is an obvious solution- not comparable to Lankford’s idiotic “solution.” My idiotic “solution”is an analogy, unlike yours, and is meant to demonstrate absurdity, through a comparison.
DC does not believe we have a problem to fix.
Another mastermind in the Senate, I see….
The new mantra for Republicans: Prov 25:26
Like a muddied spring or a polluted well are the righteous who give way to the wicked.
Of course, calling them righteous may be too big of a stretch.
Proverbs calls them the righteous. Perhaps you should too. It’s a fallen world, and even the righteous are hewn by evil.
Perhaps we should pray for strength through the slaughter. That is a reasonable stretch.
I wouldn’t include Langford among the righteous. I would include Langford among the duplicitous. He gave way long ago.
They want to tie Trump’s hands, and the next 51 weeks will be all about that. It’s the downside of his dominance. The Uniparty paymasters want them to cement this lawlessness in place. We the people have few options here, other than refusing to vote for any cretin voting yes.
Well, I don’t know how much good it’ll do, but I have burned a lot of time on the phone giving a piece of my mind to Speaker Johnson and my senators (both dems so you can imagine how long my messages lasted before deletion). Made me feel better at least speaking my truth.
This is so painful.
He keeps saying this will “give them authority.”
Dirt bags always had that authority.
And continue to have this-that “authority” at this very moment
.
.
This obnoxious proposal will give them the authority to LET IN ILLEGALS. Which authority they don’t currently have.
.
And the dirtbags continue to insult their constituents’ intelligence….outrageous. 🙁
Oklahoma GOP votes to censure Lankford over Senate border talks
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/4434317-oklahoma-gop-votes-to-censure-lankford-over-senate-border-talks/
The equivalent of a “strongly-worded letter”….but at least it’s SOMETHING and it’s on the books.
It is a start.
McConnell ‘s willing accomplice.
Langford was recently re-elected to another 6 year term 😳
Alaska GOP censured McConnell too, for financed Murkowski against Tshibaka, ‘for what its worth’.
I know…..that turned out swell.
These people hate and resent everyone. That’s why they can never stop lying.
You know he lies because he said “… Senators have to read the law before they approve”. Hah!
The border portion is probably 2% of it and the rest will be pork to ban your refrigerator and gas stove.
I detest these people with all my soul.
Biden and the Democrat Leaders will not enforce any law that secures the border. Not the laws we have now, and not any NEW law. Senator James Lankford, knows this and is just creating a RUSE to give Biden cover for his failure to follow existing law that secures the border.
Someone must have compromising information, photos or videos of the senator/former youth pastor.
And the RINOS wonder why the GOP is broke?
No, they intentionally broke it.
Lankford is the worst sort of neutered Christian. When I saw him running around at prayer breakfasts with Coons, I knew he wasn’t worth a bucket of warm spit.
E pluribus uniparty.
“This non-pretending reality frames the essential point: the element of “enforcement” is not within the legislative branch,”
The element of enforcement of any laws is fast becoming non-existent.
The Uni-party has played this game for years going back to Fat Kennedy promising Reagan better enforcement, and we see where that got us.
They play this game where if there is not a law specifically against something, the left will act at will, and the RINO’s will harrumph demanding a new law must be passed to fix the left ignoring laws already on the books.
Not enough gun control laws? Pass a new one.
Don’t peddle porn to children? We must pass laws against exposing kids to porn.
What do you mean I can’t kill my baby on demand? What about my mental health failing because I can’t kill them as often as I want?
Allow leftist billionaires to fund election operations? We must pass a law saying this is bad. Don’t do it!
A former President has classified material? HE SHOULD GET LIFE IN PRISON AND HIS FAMILY RUINED! Just ignore the much more egregious lawbreaking by our own crooks.
Open a business to try make a living? Well, what’s a little looting when you have insurance against theft.
Oh, your business was burned to the ground? Well, we gave them some room to destroy in protest.
Your medical privacy is protected by federal law? Roll up your sleeve so we can observe you getting our latest money-making scheme shot into your arm.
This country is going to hell quickly because we have evil in positions of government ignoring the law, and morons expecting we should just accept a new law to fix the evil that was already outlawed. Or just shut up and ignore the evil.
Kari Lake
@KariLake
If a deal came out of Washington, DC, that secured that border, stopped the Biden invasion, stopped the fentanyl from pouring across, President Trump would get behind that.
I would get behind that too, but that’s not what this bill is about.
This bill is about
@KyrstenSinema
and company continuing the selling out of our country and giving
@JoeBide a PR victory.
We don’t want this invasion legally codified. We want it stopped.
(Video linked in tweet)…
Why must we continue to negotiate border security and legal immigration when the laws already exist on the books? Lead, follow or get the f*** out of the way.
Sundance, I just want to thank You from the bottom of my heart for all you have done and continue to do. This Canadian has learned so much in the last few years, since PDJT came down the golden escalator with beautiful Melania to MAGA. Too much to say, so Hvala Thank you. Gospodi Blagoslovi i Pomiluj. Amen Amin!!
Asylum – the whole World’s poor wants it. Every terrorist wants asylum. This guy wants to limit the poor and the terrorists. Rino!
The biggest problem is getting rid of the McConnel faction. Nothing constructive will happen until most recognize who they are.
Even if they are very personable and say many things you like to hear.
Actually, most of them aren’t “personable” they are mostly unctuous, pompous, and oily, like Cornyn and Cruz…SOME of them DO have a tendency to SAY things they know we want to hear,…like Blackburn and Grassley, and even on occasion Linsey (remember his Kavanaugh Speach?).
Look at who is R co-chair of major committees, those are the worst offenders….
But not One Truly MAGA Senator,…
They proved themselves to be anti-America First during President Trump’s first term. Decepticons one and all.
Face the Nation can’t have a sentence without “Trump” in it – I don’t watch these anti make America great again stations.
Another day, another scam. Like gun control, the war on drugs, obama care, election integrity, dei, global warming, etc,etc, etc. “Fees for our Friends” adorned in new gift wrap.
CAN’T STAND MAGGIE BRENNAN!!
THE AMERICAN TOKYO ROSE!!
“That’s what’s driving the mayors in Denver, in Chicago, in New York City and other places around the country crazy to say, when the border gets crowded, you just release them to our cities, and it causes all the chaos in these cities. “
What a crock… No mention of the border states and the absolute nightmare they’ve been dealing with… Legalizing the illegal.
According to the Dept. of Commerce’s Bureau of Economic Analysis, 4th quarter US GDP was a little over $27 Trillion. National debt was over $35 Trillion. This means that the US economy is forced to remain entangled in the global economic model in an effort to keep up debt payments.
(https://www.bea.gov/news/2024/gross-domestic-product-fourth-quarter-and-year-2023-advance-estimate)
What would happen if we shut the border and brought home more of our manufacturing sector? Well, a closed border would mean significantly lower profits for the people at the top of the US economy – the billionaire oligarchs. Domestic manufacturing would mean less dependence on global supply chains, which means greater availability of products for domestic consumption and eventually a higher standard of living for the masses. More resources circulating among the masses means fewer resources going into those same oligarchs’ bank accounts.
So none of this is about citizens or crime or whatever other social issues. It’s simply about money. The greedy ticks feeding on our country can’t get fatter if all that money is circulating somewhere else.
For those who haven’t seen, the Oklahoma GOP has censured Lankford for this retarded move.
“Strongly worded letter”
https://www.axios.com/2024/01/29/oklahoma-republicans-condemn-lankford-senate-border-talks
Margaret Brennan is always randy in red. Thank goodness for Spanx.
These people in DC absolutely do NOT deserve a pension, nor do they deserve Healthcare For Life. Such an abomination.
Letting 3rd world ingrates into America makes us 3rd world ingrates.
D.C. hacks elected by dominion machines need a lesson in revenge. When do we take America back?
Republicans hate your guts.
The ONLY way to make the administration follow the law is to tie adherance to the law to funding. No adherance to the law, then funding for ALL agencies is cut 10% for that year. IOW, violate the numbers of border crossers for one day, and face a 10% reduction across the board unless and until the number of illegals for the previous YEAR are removed from the country and returned to their country of origin. You MUST get their attention. Sadly, the administration has no clue where the vast majority of the illegal aliens are in this country nor do they care. Ignorance being bliss makes this the happiest administration EVER!
Liar! Even his eyes show his hatred and dishonesty. Oklahoma remove him from the Senate! He may have once been a Baptist Minister, but for years now he has been a Trump hater and a RINO. He is not a man of God!
“Remove him from the Senate.” How, pray tell?
Do yourselves a favor and don’t listen to a damned thing any paid shill, professional politician, or hysteric says about anything.
Lankford makes a near-perfect senate parlor monkey; a provincial eunuch with a law degree striking poses in pursuit of narcissistic supply and the adulation of his senate colleagues.
It’s a cult, not a congress.
Bonus points for Parlor Monkey.