Special Counsel Jack Smith held a press conference today following the unsealing of a federal criminal indictment alleging four counts against President Donald J Trump. [Full Indictment pdf Link]
The four alleged criminal counts are: (1) Conspiracy to defraud the U.S Government; (2) Conspiracy to Obstruct an Official Proceeding; (3) Obstruction of and Attempt to Obstruct an Official Proceeding; and (4) Conspiracy against Rights.
Interestingly, nowhere in the indictment is anything criminally alleged relating to the January 6, 2021, events at the U.S. Capitol building in Washington DC. However, you will notice in the Lawfare delivery of the remarks, Special Counsel Jack Smith factually speaks almost exclusively of the January 6th events.
The absence of a criminal charge (ie. seditious conspiracy or insurrection) when contrast against the extreme verbal emphasis of the event as outlined by Smith in the presser, will be missed by most. Speaking of the non-criminal event as the context for a fabricated/stretched criminal allegation, is Lawfare in action. Why emphasize but not charge? Because the DOJ/FBI does not want the risk of litigated discovery and evidence of coordinated government activity therein, that’s why.
Jack Smith knows he is out on a limb with his Lawfare effort to criminalize the legal and constitutional challenge to an election outcome. He is nervous, WATCH:
.
The brighter the sunlight falling upon government corruption and weaponization, the more those who perpetrate corruption and weaponization will have to shield against it.
At this point in history these attacks against President Donald Trump are Lawfare members sticking fingers and toes into the cracks of a justice dam that is increasingly unstable and about to collapse. The pressure on the other side is the dam is the collective anger of We The People, and when that dam breaks no pre-positioned scuba gear is going to protect them.
Continue living your very best life. Do not let yourself or your family fall victim to the fear of dark imaginings. However, look beyond our current proximity and keep your eyes open for any/all constructs that can be repurposed to protect government interests through physical lock downs.
Thank you. Needed to hear this.
The whole video segment can be viewed here:
https://dailycaller.com/2023/08/01/there-is-no-smoking-gun-alan-dershowitz-says-its-unlikely-jan-6-indictment-against-trump-will-survive/?fbclid=IwAR2AJWafrFx6lcnBhKWtNHoKwMZKJ03SXI9b936zztk9K8Y7W_GzyKcCoyE
Smith look’s surprised because he was told to immediately indict Trump so as to deflect from the Devon archer testimony against the Biden crime syndicate. I can see this from a mile away. It’s all theatre. This was all preplanned. They played the “indict Trump “ card to get media to report on that 24/7 as a distraction from Devon archer.
Pretty quiet in that room. We should plant a reporter to yell out a silly question like “Will Ray Epps be called as a defense witness?” And do that at every f-ing presser this guy does.
The list of witnesses could be a fun task. I’m sure Nancy’s name should be on it.
GOOD IDEA!!!
yes! Who will do that? and another question, Who will rid us of this troublesome person?
I fully expect President Trump will be convicted in DC and NY. The judges are corrupt and the jurors will be corrupt. It takes some intelligence and the ability to think to ascertain the difference between the law and the BS the prosecutors will feed them. These show trials are already fixed.
difference between lawfare, law and the the BS….
maybe not. this is an act of d. there are lots of demands for discovery. lots of video. This may blow up in their faces.
NY is about valuations of property. Trump doesn’t determine those and the people who audit his financials don’t make mistakes. I see that going nowhere and even if it did the potential fine won’t hurt him.
I honestly feel better about the DC case. There isn’t anything illegal about it and the laws cited to prosecute him don’t even apply. It was hastily put together for a media narrative. If it were to ever go to trial it would present more headaches for the DC political class than Trump.
He’s talking about the Bragg case. Which is legally illiterate garbage but it doesn’t matter. None of the actual charges matter, they’re just a means. It is true that Trump will never ever get a fair trial in DC or NY. However, I don’t see any of these convictions standing up under appeal, especially if SCOTUS wants to get involved (which I think they will, least of all because Ginni Thomas is in the firing line if they convict Trump for saying the election was stolen)
The SCOTUS is a bunch of traitors and will simply tell us we have “no standing.”
Can’t bear to look at this Bozo–pegs my weasel meter every time.
I think that he looks like I seem to remember Rasputin[ looked!!!!!!!!!!!
He has lost MANY of these high profile cases against political figures by using novel legal theories to apply statutes to behaviors that are not actually addressed by what are called The Elements of the statutes. Take, for example, the statute 18 USC 241 which is used by Smith to apply to Trump for allegedly attempting to deprive people of their voting rights. This was tried SUCCESSFULLY by the DOJ in prosecuting DOUGLAS MACKEY, a meme developer and publisher on Social Media platforms like TWITTER. Mackey went by the Internet handle of “Ricky Vaughn” on Twitter, the Charlie Sheen character in the movie comedy Major League.
Conditional Statements are IF-THEN-ELSE statements which are used a lot in designing software. Such logical statements are the basis for creating programming flow charts. This logic is easy to follow once you get the hang of it. The application of this kind of logic was the foundation of the legal training prospective FBI “New Agent Candidates” have to master in order to pass the legal examination during training at Quantico.
Conditional Statements can be IF/ELSE statements or they can be IF/AND statements. When there are IF/ELSE statements, only one condition has to be met in order for the statement to be true. For example:
IF a baseball team can score more runs than the other team
THEN it can defeat the other team
ELSE
IF a baseball team can keep the other team from scoring more runs than their baseball team
THEN it can defeat the other team
ELSE a baseball team will lose to the other team
Only one of the two conditions, scoring more runs than the other team, OR keeping the other team from scoring more runs than them MUST be true in order for the given team to win the game.
Another form of conditional statements are IF/AND statements. In that case more than one conditional statement must be true in order for the conclusion to be true.
IF a baseball team has good starting pitching
AND
IF a baseball team has good middle relief pitching
AND
IF a baseball team has two solid closer relief pitchers
THEN that baseball team has a good chance of winning many games
ELSE that baseball team will have trouble winning many games
In this case, ALL THREE conditions must be met, good starting, middle inning relief, and closer relief pitching must be present on the baseball team for it to win many games. The absence of one creates a problem winning many games.
The same kind of conditional statements are in federal statutes. One of the best to use to apply this knowledge of conditional statements is 18 USC 241 and how it was used against Douglas Mackey, who, by the way, was found guilty. I think that verdict was very wrong, and I will show you why.
Mackey published a meme that encouraged Hillary Clinton supporters in 2016 to vote for her by text message, and included phone numbers to call with a cell phone to enter such a text message. There was a similar meme used by a Hillary supporter to get Trump voters to cast a vote by text message, but she was not prosecuted. When we break down the statute, and try to match the conditional statement (“The Elements”) of the statute to Mackey’s publishing a meme, that will determine if Mackey actually violated the statute. What follows is the statute:
“If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or
“If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured—
“They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an
attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.”
The IF statements are right out there to be considered one at a time since the word “OR” is used to indicated only ONE condition needs to be met in order for the suspect to have violated the statute. Within both are other conditions as well that are both Stand Alone Conditions which is another way of saying only ONE needs to be true in order for there to be a violation. The second one is the easiest for us to deal with first, so let’s look at it in isolation:
“If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured—
Okay, here are our conditions:
IF two or more persons go in disguise on the highway
ELSE
IF two or more persons go in disguise on the premises of another (a victim)
AND
IF the two or more persons have intent to prevent or hinder the exercise of any lawful right or privilege by going about a highway or on the premises of another in disguise
THEN those two or more persons are guilty of violating this statute.
The part about “going about in disguise” is key to the original intent of the statute–To criminalize the behaviors of a group known as the KU KLUX KLAN (KKK).
Does anyone know if Trump or any of his White House or personal staff members or attorneys “went about is disguise” on the highway or the premises of another? Well, we know that did not happen, so these conditional statements are not applicable to what Trump is alleged to have done. Now let’s look at the first part, and remember, this statute is about an underground terror group, the KKK.
“If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same…”
So, the conditional statements in this part of the statute are:
IF two or more persons do any of the following to any person in any State, Territory, Commonweath, Possession, or District (of the USA) in the free exercise of any legal right or privilege:
IF the two or more persons INJURE any person
ELSE
IF the two or more persons OPPRESS any person
ELSE
IF the two or more persons THREATEN any person
ELSE
IF the two or more persons INTIMIDATE any person
THEN
the two or more persons have violated this statute
Did Trump or any of his White House employees, staffers, or attorneys do these things to anyone to prevent them from exercising their lawful rights or privileges?
NO. Since Trump thought there was fraud that changed the outcome of the election, the intent was not to deny anyone their right to vote, but was against what they thought was fraud in the election, whether or not there was enough fraud to change that outcome. Intent is important in this statute, but also the actions of the suspects are important, limited as they are to the brutal, violent, and physical activity of terrorizing, etc. to prevent and inhibit the exercise of lawful rights and privileges which are absent in the kind of activities that actually took place during the period between the 2020 election and January 6, 2021.
This statute is not applicable to the activities of Trump trying to expose, and seek a remedy for, election or vote fraud in the election.
What Smith is doing was what I posted about the Mackey case on TWITTER years ago. There is an absence of a voting rights statute that deals with fraud, deceit, and grifting-type confidence schemes designed to deceive, trick, or misdirect people away from exercising their voting rights. What is needed is for Congress to pass such legislation, not to take a totally unrelated statute with Elements that do not match the actions of a person(s) and apply it to those actions. That is not justice.
Ironically, this is a novel legal theory that one can take the intent of any statute, despite its Elements not coming close to a description of what a person(s) have done, and applying it simply because, in the case of 18 USC 241, its intent is to protect the exercise of such a legal right as voting. Smith is seeking to criminalize novel legal theories about the casting and counting of Electoral votes on January 6, 2021, which Trump and some of his advisors believed could be used as a remedy for what they thought was fraud in the 2020 election.
When LAWFARE runs wild.
Here we go, just what we’ve been waiting for:
https://truthsocial.com/@TheStormHasArrived17/posts/110817336617071803
I’m just hoping that John Lauro is every bit the beast he sounds like
If so, this could get VERY interesting
Smith doesn’t have statutes for covering what he considers are offenses. The Electoral Count Act has no criminal element to it–no punishments are listed in it for “violations.” So, to get “violations” Smith is using statutes NOT RELATED to what he is alleging Trump and others did. I’m checking his other statutes because I think his “defrauding the federal government” statute also has nothing to do with what he is accusing Trump, et. al. of doing.
I pray that this totally blows up in the demons’ collective face. I believe polls show that already more than 50% of the country suspects there was fraud in ’20 (and ’22).
Would be awesome if this BS allows more light to be shone on the fraud, so that all but the hardcore brainwashed (~30%) know the truth.
Article 2 tasks the President to “take care that the laws are faithfully executed.” This, and being Commander-in-Chief, is what the Constitution clearly describes as “his job.”
Therefore, when he recognizes the presence of election fraud (a Federal crime), say, in Georgia, it is his Constitutional duty to contact and speak with the responsible public official – and it is his prerogative to decide who to speak to and, while speaking, to freely use any words that he likes. Likewise, when he believes that Congress is about to certify the results of a fraudulent election instead of doing their duty to investigate, he also has the duty to speak up.
The President cannot commit any crime by exercising his Oath of Office any way he wishes to. He is, literally, the one-person Executive Branch of Government. The powers, duties, and prerogatives of each Branch are exclusive to it and “separated.” They cannot be countered, questioned, nor abrogated by any other – nor by any minion employee of the Executive. The Executive Branch cannot commit a crime by “being the Executive Branch” as (s)he sees fit.
All of this is “settled law,” as per many SCOTUS decisions. It is high time for the Former President to appeal directly to the SCOTUS, as the “court of primary jurisdiction” in this case, and ask them to re-affirm what they have already decided many times before.
Got your point, but wouldn’t it violate the literal statute for, say, Trump and Eastman to try to get Pence to recognize the controversy over certain electors and interrupt the count?
No, because Pence had the Constitutional Obligation to do so. He chose not to.
I can only find reference for what the President of the Senate must do during the Joint Session of Congress in the counting of the Electoral Votes and the certifying of the Electoral Votes. In Article 2, Section 1 it states:
“The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and the House of Representatives, open all certificates (each States Certificate of Electoral Votes), and the Votes shall then be counted.”
The word “shall,” as opposed to “will,” means it is required that the President of the Senate open every certification of Electoral votes sent by States’ authorities to the President of the Senate and the National Archives. This is done in alphabetical order of the States. There can’t be groupings of State electoral votes (2 or more states) that the President of the Senate can dispose of by his own unilateral decision when the Constitution requires the opening of “all” certificates.
The votes are counted by tellers, two of whom are Senators and two who are Representatives. President of the Senate hands the open certificate to a teller. The teller announces the vote of a particular State, since CONGRESS counts the votes, followed by the President of the Senate calling for any objections to that slate of Electors from the floor. Each objection must be in writing and signed by at least one Member of Congress and one Senator. The Senate then retires to their chambers to debate the objection and vote concerning its disposal while the House does the same. The Joint Session then meets and informs the President of the Senate of their decision about the objection. President of the Senate has no authority to decide what happens to slates of Electors under an objection.
No, because the Electoral Count Act has no criminal element to it, and I haven’t found another statute that covers this contingency. 18 USC 241 has nothing to do with Electoral Vote counting at all. It has to do with bully boy KKK terrorists lurking about in their spook outfits burning crosses, beating up people, and holding lynch parties. It has nothing to do with the counting of Electoral Votes.
The ” in disguise” is far more applicable to the Antifa, BLM, FBI, European activists etc. present that day in the crowd, than to what would be applicable to President Trump.
Also, far more applicable to our current members of Congress, the Courts and most Federal/State agencies. They are most certainly in “disguise” as public servants.
Conspiracy as well.
As is well known, they accuse others of what they are actually guilty of themselves. I hope this truly does blow up in their face.
He looks like a Star Trek villain
he is no different than the guy who put the silenced .22 to Seth Rich’s head.
He definitely looks like someone I’d cross the street to avoid.
as my son used to say, he has a “beat up” face, meaning it makes you want to beat him up.
My weasel meter got overheated and is in the shop. Fortunately I have a dung detector that works pretty much the same way.
At this point in history these attacks against President Donald Trump are Lawfare members sticking fingers and toes into the cracks of a justice dam that is increasingly unstable and about to collapse.
That crack about to burst is nothing more than the pro and contrast sunlight on the ‘prefect phone call’.
I keep harping on this, but until the un-awoken start connecting the dots, the MSM is more than happy pretending it does not exist and bull nosing ya’all.
I got a bent nickel, I will gladly trade that bent nickel for a brand new nickel as a reasonable trade that the highly manufactured MSM is saying PDJT has spent untold millions defending himself. When truth be told his defense does not require untold millions but nothing more than the exchange of one nickel for another.
Cheap is not the extant, it is more like priceless.
Has not everyone taken the breath of the Lawfare’s legal position of posturing and witnessed on the massive holes any first year legal student could make about the two tiered justice and the juristic prudence of the legal fallacies being whole sale swept aside.
The fact that has not happened, “Tells you what?”
This is not about how weak Lawfare stands inlight of a bent nickel wagered against multi millions of dollars of legal representation.
It is entirely about how aligned the jurist prudence of this country has wagered the value of this bent nickel.
Is anyone here surprised about this?
No.
I am mot surprised, I am saddened.
The February 2021 Senate impeachment trial of President Trump ended with a verdict of Not Guilty with respect to inciting an insurrection at the US Capitol.
How can these recent criminal charges, allegedly brought about in an attempt to facilitate an insurrection, be brought against the President if he has been found not guilty of the precipitating act (insurrection)?
Article I, Section 3, Clause 7 of the Constitution states, “Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.”
President Trump was NOT CONVICTED in the 2021 Senate trial; therefore he is not liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment or Punishment.
Is this latest salvo of charges by Jack Smith (via Lawfare) not an attempt to reverse (with rhetoric) the 2021 Senate verdict, while simultaneously bringing to bear the full force of the “Indictment, Trial, Judgment or Punishment” phase of Article I, Section 3, Clause 7 of the Constitution, which the 2021 Senate verdict made moot?
⬆︎⬆︎⬆︎⬆︎⬆︎⬆︎⬆︎⬆︎⬆︎⬆︎⬆︎⬆︎⬆︎⬆︎⬆︎⬆︎⬆︎⬆︎⬆︎⬆︎⬆︎⬆︎⬆︎ THIS ⬆︎⬆︎⬆︎⬆︎⬆︎⬆︎⬆︎⬆︎⬆︎⬆︎⬆︎⬆︎⬆︎⬆︎⬆︎⬆︎⬆︎⬆︎⬆︎⬆︎⬆︎⬆︎⬆︎
Bravo, Lafn!
Excellent legal point! Really the most important observation I’ve read so far in this thread.
The term double jeopardy comes to mind.
They’re trying to see how many stupid are when it comes to civics
Double jeopardy all the way
Long read, but should answer your questions.
The way I understand this is a former President must be impeached before he can be indicted. Trump was not impeached for any of these charges.
https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/olc/opinions/2000/10/31/op-olc-v024-p0222_0.pdf
Exactly, Carbonbasedlifeform#7!
Article I, Section 3, Clause 7….
“… : but the Party convicted”
President Trump has already been tried by the Constitutionally elected Senate and found not guilty.
As Lurker360 suggests…
How is this, or any trial after that decision, (especially an unelected Grand jury) not double Jeopardy?!?
The then Speaker of the House delivered, very publicly and with great fanfare, the articles of impeachment to…
THE SENATE
And the SENATE declined to convict.
FIN
THIS is the prize they’re after…nothing more, nothing less
“…disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States…”
I think the second place prize is to get him to spend all his money defending himself in court so he can’t use it to campaign. It’s just another attack vector to try and keep him out of office.
From your keyboard Lafn to President Trump’s lawyers ears.
“The party convicted” refers to the removal from office that follows a conviction after an impeachment, the impeachment being like an indictment. Once removed from office, a President is liable for indictment and trial for any offenses committed while in office. Just like being removed from office because of conviction under impeachment, being unelected, or just leaving office after two terms, opens a President up for indictment for any past offenses committed either before entering the office, or during the holding of the office, of President.
The indictment looks like a Weissman cut and paste Enron hit job.
The GOP leadership better put an end to the Smith SC shitshow by ending his funding and begining impeachments.
Your party and its future hangs in the balance, let alone the whole nation. There will be no turning back if you let this continue.
Seriously? The Big Club GOP hates PDT as much as any other DC scum. They might write another firmly worded letter but the GOP trash in DC are just as complicit in this anti-PDT lawfare BS. They had the chance to defund this garage and punted
The Big Club GOP/RNC is the entity MOST threatened by DJT coming down the escalator.
And they are going down, for good in 2024.
Their consistent refusal to speak out,from muh Russia on, all of their inaction on the relentless, unfounded attacks against PDJT, exposed their perfidy and collusion for all to see.
And now we will see it ‘play out’, and they will LOSE.
Even a conviction in a D.C. Court, will be appealed, and when the case gets high enough, overturned.
Just as many of PDJT’s actions as President were challenged in court, and he lost, lost then won eventually.
But, Lswfare against PDJT isn’t about the law, or ultimately prevailing in legal courts, its about the Court of Public Opinion, and thats where they have ultimately lost, and the Jury has already rendered its verdict.
As with every previous move, this is a “sacrifice play”; a short term defensive manuever, that costs them far more than the limited short term benefit.
As long as people vote for the GOP and their hand-selected lackey RINOs or Bushie-GOPe candidates, the Party Leadership isn’t going to do squat to fight back against the Leftist take-over of our Country.
The Leftists are not stupid. They ensure that Mitch, McCarthy and all those who could *potentially* rise up and fight are WELL PAID to remain on the sidelines.
And remain on the sidelines they do.
Stop voting for the GOPe. Voting for the “lesser of two evils” is still voting for evil. If there isn’t a MAGA candidate, let the Leftist POS win. The sooner the GOPe dies and our Country burns, the sooner MAGA can rise. There is no other way.
I don’t believe they are voted in. I believe they are selected.
Touché
You’re right. We have reached that point where it is time to clean house.
A conviction takes a while to get appealed. The plan, IMHO, is to get a conviction, keeping PDJT off the ballot, and then stall the appeal process until after the election.
Much the way they stall the election results until after enough “ballots” can be “found”.
Election Interference!!!
By the book
🎯
A conviction wouldn’t keep Trump off the ballot. There is no legal obstacle to Trump being on the ballot.
The plan here is to tie him up in legal proceedings, limiting his ability to campaign, bankrupting him and hoping that a conviction will permanently ruin his electability with Independent and Moderate voters.
The only obstacle to him actually being on the ballot is if the GOPe refuse to endorse him as their candidate in light of all the indictments/a conviction. However, if they do that, they are completely finished as a national party of any significance.
He won’t need to campaign. He will be on the nightly and weekend news for months 😂 Free publicity!
Secondly, courthouses usually close at 4 or 5. He can be wheels up by 6 and onto a rally venue any night of the week, or any weekend.
I’m just sad he has to go thru this. But he has our support and that seems to make him very strong.
Right now, even if convicted, there’s nothing keeping him off the ballot.
Give your GOP reps an earfull over their recess. Trump is right, those who doen’t fight then they need to be primaried and voted out.
The Big Club Controlled Opposition GOP are a bunch of fools if they allow the Democrats to get away with this. They can’t see that, if the Democrats get away with this, eventually they will decide that they have no need for even controlled opposition
YES!!! And he has hired NUMEROUS, lawyers, in the Mara Lago trial!!! SO, WE’RE PAYING out the YING YANG for all those NUMEROUS lawyers to help the BIG TURD, Jack Smith.
It’s definitely TIME TO PUT A STOP TO IT!!!
Whoever’s got access to Congress needs to send an ALERT email!
Maybe they read emails while on vacation!
(In between sending emails and texts asking for money)
I get several dozen a day, lots of them from people I never heard of. They don’t tell what state they’re running in.
I know it’s not SC. Nancy Mace is my Congress woman, and I’ve voted my last time for her.
Someone needs to move to disbarr him, but with the rot so deep, who will do it?
‘Your party and its future hangs in the balance, let alone the whole nation. There will be no turning back if you let this continue.’ – johnnyfandango
If we could travel in time back to Ford’s pardon of Nixon, and tell people that half a century on, a former president and leading presidential candidate would face federal trial during the height of campaign season, they would snort in derision.
‘That only happens in despotic Third World regimes,’ they would object. ‘Not in America.’
Yet here we are, on the other side of Rubicon, with our boats burnt to prevent retreat.
As johnnyfandango says, the repercussions are irreversible. From here on, it’s probably the norm that most presidents will face multiple impeachments during their term(s), then scorched-earth criminal prosecutions afterward.
Since such chaotic instability is unsustainable, this country is headed for a bad crack-up. I am beyond appalled.
Do not hold your breath!
As usual they point fingers when they are about to be revealed as the real perpetrators. The election was stolen – not by votes but by censorship of the political opposition. This is fact.
I just read this on Twitter…(I don’t get to read much)
Solution for the CommieCrats!
SOLUTION!https://truthsocial.com/packs/emoji/1f1fa-1f1f8.svg
VOTING NATIONAL HOLIDAY!
ONE VOTE!
ONE DAY!Voter ID/U.S. CITIZEN REQUIRED!
Hand Count PAPER BALLOTS!
No MACHINES!
Smaller Precinct POLLING LOCATIONS!
No MAIL IN/ABSENTEE BALLOTS, except for Military & Disabled!
WINNERS ANNOUNCED BY 10:00AM the next day!
Anyone caught cheating incur Automatic Loss of U.S. Citizenship/Deportation or TREASON PENALTY!
PROBLEM SOLVED!
Then someone answered; THE LEFT COMMIES WILL NEVER ALLOW IT!
OR…The STATES will never allow it!
And by votes too
May Donald Trump pray this prayer of Voltaire to God tonight(1767): “Oh Lord, make my enemies ridiculous.”
Voltaire said it was the only prayer he ever offered to God and he said this prayer was answered !
Asking for something like:
“Those whom the Gods wish to destroy, they first deprive of their senses,” ~Euripides
I am truly perplexed why they do this at this point in time. It is like watching a movie, but, the director, cameras, crew, and the limits of the sets are also shown in the movie itself. Not only do you not believe it, but, it indicts the people doing it. That is, the illusion is so thoroughly destroyed that the people ‘behind the scenes’ are watched far more carefully than the cinematic story itself.
This video with Jack can be interwoven with videos which immediately destroy his words, the intent of his speech. When Jack said that Prez Trump tried to undermine the official business of the capitol then it could be shown with Trump saying leave peacefully. When Jack describes the heroics of the WH cops, then videos of them ushering J6 guests around the halls can be shown with his words. There are a myriad of ways to show the travesty of his little Reichstag fire speech.
It is so obvious that it parodies itself. That is why I don’t really know why they chose this angle of attack.
Upon reflection, what this tells me that they have done this trick so many times in the past — and I, for one, never caught on until recently — that they simply do it again, like bad habit, like they are sleepwalking, like this is Kabuki theatre. They have been doing this for decades before Trump and with all kinds of politicians, senators, state senators, congressmen, alderman, etc. They have no real idea how to handle this because they have only a limited playbook and the jig is up for them. They are standing naked before us.
Yes it’s all they know how to do – they are not creative, only manipulative without creative vision.
Someone(s) Brilliant will have that video – or several versions – made within a few hours. The timeline of the day and the videos from citizen journalists combined & interspersed… will provide savage mockery for this latest episode of the Dog&PonyShow presented by the crew of the Biden-Ship-of-Fools directed by the TheaterOfAbsurdity Thespians.
For whoever knows those who make compilation video memes… please sent this on…
{ 1/6 Coup Timeline Long https://seedoftexas.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/SaveAmericaMarchTimeline-Version-2.pdf }
Such a good post!
Sean Parnell
@SeanParnellUSA
I think there are a lot of people like Jason out there in America.
We need all of them to stand up and say stop the insanity because our nation is on the brink.
***
Jason Willhardt
@Avalanche3319
Clown world strikes again. I’m not a huge Trump fan, but this boils my blood and makes me want to rally behind him.
8:20 PM · Aug 1, 2023
Just President Trump?
Where’s my indictment because I completely reject and protest the results of the 2020 Presidential election.
Nothing for me or my 74 million close friends?
81 million votes my ass!
yes , indict us all!!!! why dont some MAGA attorneys file those charges . FLOOD THE ZONE
Ryan Saavedra
@RealSaavedra
Sen. John Barrasso (R-WY), chairman of the Senate Republican Conference, on the latest Trump indictment:
“The American people have lost faith in Biden’s Justice Department.
“They are uncomfortable watching the current president weaponize the justice system against his political opponent. The Justice Department’s own flimsy deal to save Biden’s son didn’t even hold up in court.
“This two-tiered system of justice is wrong. The country deserves better.”
12:38 AM · Aug 2, 2023
Uncomfortable?! Uncomfortable?! No…I’m Pi$$ed !
Where are the GOP? Where are the other candidates that supposedly want this job? And how do they think they will fare against this kind of corruption? They better speak out soon or get off the stage. I don’t want to hear about pardons. This is a weasel way to justify corrupt prosecution.
I would say to Barrasso, then do something!!!
Oversight Project
@OversightPR
🧵The “electors investigation” was originated at the
@FBI by former agent Tim Thibault, who resigned after his political bias was exposed
The @FBI remains in violation of Federal law by refusing to turn over records relevant to Thibault to the Oversight Project
Cont…
Kyle Seraphin
@KyleSeraphin
Thibault removed a Catholic (and unvaxed) father of 9 with 10 yrs of experience and other unvaxed Agents from the squad responsible for this work.
Thibault reportedly his other supervisors he didn’t want an “Trump voters” on his election fraud squad per my sources at
@FBIWFO
Cont…
.
He has the voice of a pre-pubescent boy. INCONGRUENCE.
It is weak. His whole demeanor communicates weakness. He is over his head, not even treading water. I don’t think that he knows it, yet.
If I didn’t trust SD I would have thoughr this was some kind of hoax. You know – like QAnon. After all, I’m an Ultra MAGA white supremacist racist heterosexual, white-privileged right-winger!
Saagar Enjeti
@esaagar
Jonathan Turley: “When I take red pen through the indictment that is protected by the first amendment it reduces to a haiku…many of the things that are being charged here are protected speech”
6:09 PM · Aug 1, 2023
·
Miranda Devine
@mirandadevine
Why is it the largest investigation in history? For a few hours of rioting after a year in which political activists whipped up violent BLM-Antifa riots which terrorized people across the the country. For months in 2020 city blocks burned and people died, cops were attacked and chaos reigned. It wasn’t spontaneous. It was organized terrorism. That should have been the largest investigation in a legitimate DOJ, but nada. Instead a sitting president abuses his power to protect his son and lock up his chief political rival. Corrupt.
James Lynch
@jameslynch32
Trump’s D.C. judge worked for Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP, the same law firm that employed Hunter Biden and whose former partner Heather King worked with Burisma alongside Hunter
@DailyCaller
Cont…
🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸
@mrddmia
Thank you to
@tracegallagher
for having me on
@foxnewsnight
.
We discussed Jack Smith’s latest bogus indictment of Trump.
This time, for the non-crime of objecting to an election.
Latest Democrat law-fare against Trump.
Because they fear they can’t beat him in November 2024.
Video linked in tweet…👇
Smith’s claim about no hacked election systems could boomerang on him during Trump case
https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/smith-claim-about-no-hacked-election-systems-could-boomerang-him-during-trump?utm_medium=social_media&utm_source=twitter_social_icon&utm_campaign=social_icons
Although we’re South Africa, my husband and I love the USA and Pres. Trump. The legal fees incurred in all these pseudo charges and indictments must be amounting to many milions of dollars. Is it possible these criminals are trying to bankrupt Mr Trump in the same way they did Mike Flynn and Rodger Stone?
Yup, that’s exactly it
After each phony indictment President Trump gets enormous financial support from the MAGAdonians.
The ankle biter strikes again – this time the day after Hunter’s “Sugar Brother” Devon Archer gives damning information to the House Oversight Committee of the Joe/Hunter team tag influence peddling scheme for foreign money.
Jack Smith has priors on hitting President Trump with indictments following revelations about the corrupt Biden cartel – this was the third time.
The sugar brother s Kevin Morris.
I watched the 2:52 minute clip.
Only 1:00 minute on “fake indictment” of our favorite President. The other 1:52 was spent talking about the men and women of law enforcement and DOJ.
So, in a press conference that brings charges against a person who was the President of the United States at the time of the so called “indictable offense”, they can only present a statement lasting 60 seconds.
Really? You’re taking the unprecedented action of indicting a President for his actions while serving as President and all you have is a 60 second statement?
Weak sauce indeed.
I shudder to think what these agents of Beelzebub, like Jack Smith, will face when true judgment is meted out to them by the Judge of all judges.
As you say, only Christ can judge if He knows them or not, but from the looks of their actions here, I’d say none of these people know Christ; therefore, at their judgment day, they will face eternal damnation and separation from God.
That is the worst sentence anyone could receive and there’s no parole for good behavior. Damnation to hell is for all eternity.
They have no clue.
My first impression when watching was “Did watermelon head grow a beard?”
He looks like cereal liar Shifty Schiff when presenting his lies.
Yes, cereal liar, as in “Cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs” liar Schiff.
As far as I’m aware, Jack Smith is way outside of his lane entirely in prosecuting Trump for anything arising during his term in office.
As far as I know, the President is immune to criminal prosecution. Trump was the sitting President at the time these allegations occurred.
And the last I knew, while there are opposing opinions on the matter, it is still DOJ policy to not indict a sitting President.
Correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t this still DOJ policy?
Impeachment is the remedy to a rouge President.
https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/olc/opinions/2000/10/31/op-olc-v024-p0222_0.pdf
It’s a long read, but very educational.
Relitigationm
R.E.V.E.N.G.E.
That smith guy looks like the lead singer of “clutch”https://youtu.be/X8cmbmwFAl8
This is so over the top ridiculous. A legal proceeding was going on with legitimate challenges to the 2020 election.
How can you conspire to overturn the election when there was legal means being taken to investigate the fraud?
The capitol breach was planned to stop the proceedings from going forward we all know that. Led by Ray Epps and others.
The deep state are the ones who should be indicted. Tired of the nonsense.
Oh Lord, I pray that I wake tomorrow to here that Jack was taken unexpectedly by myocarditis or random gunfire. I don’t care which. Either would be fine with me. Nothing wrong with wishing that…right?
Human maggot, Jack Smith, is a tortured soul.
At least, it’s gratifying to watch him squirm.
Black women judges are guilty of being racist slobs.
The last-straw outrage we now need to see must come from the Democrats themselves. With this latest revelation of Fascist Tyranny, those Democrats who’ve chosen to remain in that cesspool of a party now have a crystal clear choice: accept, laud, propagate and participate in the Evil, or finally admit what it is, leave and condemn it. No middle ground, not even a smidgen.
You’re either with us, or you’re with the Fascists.
stand with Trump 2024,MAGA.
Nice to see them cringe. You will get what you deserve Mr. Smith for trying to destroy Governor McDonnell’s life, reputation and career—among many others.
This is the final move by the Left and all the chips are on the table. An Obama appointed judge has been assigned by design to the case, Ms. Chutpan, a real piece of work. She has already sentenced several innocents to long prison terms thus giving precedence to such sentences for J6th activity. Like, Sundance, has explained many times, “There are trillions at stake.”
I don’t see a way out unless ….
Oh there is more coming. They’re not done, unless someone slaps them down hard.
Jack ( Vladimir ) Smith.
Ordinarily their marks can’t afford to fight back. Trump can afford it and raise more money to fight them as needed. This could backfire spectacularly on the DOJ
I try very hard to follow your advice and “live my best life, and not fall victim to fear…”, and I don’t have to really use my imagination with what we’ve all seen in the last few years. I’ve seen things happen that if I didn’t know for sure I might think I were having a nightmare I could wake up from, but I know I’m not. This horrible man and others like him MUST be smoked out and defeated in a way that they can NEVER hold power again. It will take every patriot, and probably a generation because the commies a have burrowed in so deep, but if we fail, the world is literally doomed because there is no place like America.
Retired Magistrate here: If you are not living your best life and are fearful all the time, then they win. Yes, I know things are dark right now in this country; however, we have been dark places before.
I was born two years after the end of World War II. Everybody thought, well, no more wars; wrong! Several years later we had the Korean War, then atomic bomb drills in school, then the Cuban Missile Crisis where we came very close to World War III and then President Kennedy assassinated along with Martin Luther King and Bobby Kennedy. After that the Viet Nam War (every night on the news, body counts), anti war demonstrations, Watergate, the Carter years with high interest rates (18%), energy crises, hostage situation, then the Regan years when things got better except for the attempted assassination of President Regan. After that the Gulf War, then 9-11, the War on Terror, economic downturns, etc. and here we are.
If you are a student of history, you know that at the start of World War II, Japanese Americans were locked up in concentration camps with no due process whatsoever. All their property was confiscated and they were shipped all over the west to live in crowded camps for the duration. During the FDR years, we were a communist country with all of FDR’s programs, many of which were overturned by the Supreme Court after the War.
So, we have been in dark places before. Do not give up. We are a country which has turned its back on GOD to our detriment. Many of our churches have gone “woke” and forgotten their purpose: to spread the gospel and make disciples. And so here we are. It took years to get us where we are today and it is going to take years to restore us to our founding principles.
So, we can you do. Live your best life; help others, increase your tribe and pray that GOD will have mercy on us.
Amen
Where’s the GOPe outrage? If this was a Commie/Dem they would en masse hold a press conference or refuse to attend to Congress when they all return from their stupid vacation.
This is the Uniparty in action.
Hey Jack, when are you going back to the 2016 election and prosecute loudmouth Mad Max Waters? It may be tough to get an address for her since she doesn’t actually RESIDE in the district she represents and, by law, where she is supposed to be a resident.
DC judge who will oversee Trump’s criminal case is ‘toughest punisher’ of Jan 6 rioters – and worked for a law firm associated with Hunter Biden
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12363639/DC-judge-oversee-Trumps-criminal-case-toughest-punisher-Jan-6-rioters-worked-law-firm-associated-Hunter-Biden.html
Boy does he like to make himself look smart. Well, I’m here to tell you he’s done NOTHING and brought NOTHING! These BS charges have already been run through and squashed. It’s all media bureaucracy led by a bunch of NOTHINGS! AMERICANS are very SMART! This fool will GO DOWN as the most hated idiot.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/judge-rules-trump-entitled-to-presidential-immunity-in-defamation-lawsuit-5437328?src_src=morningbriefnoe&src_cmp=mb-2023-08-02&est=zUjQOJoJMGDfXw%2By5XQS%2B2NFDe1fPdmU2gDr1B%2FlcOS1WIn6Wh485dq4x6vXEDc7O7tMVw%3D%3D
A Pennsylvania judge dismissed part of a lawsuit that a state election employee brought against former President Donald Trump for comments he made about the integrity of the 2020 presidential race.
The statements made by Mr. Trump about election integrity were “undoubtedly a matter of great public concern” and his remarks “dealt with the cornerstone of our democracy,” Judge Erdos wrote in his ruling, Breitbart reported.
However, “speaking to the public on matters of public concern is part of a President’s official duties. Indeed, the President’s use of the ‘bully pulpit’ to address the Nation has historically been an important feature of the office.”
“Other legal proceedings may examine the propriety of his statements and actions while he was the President and whether, as the plaintiffs in this and other cases contend, it was this conduct which served as the actual threat to our democracy.”
“But this case is not the proper place to do so. Here, Trump is entitled to Presidential immunity,” Judge Erdos said.
wow! the weak voice, the uncommitted-to-my words body language!
Who would follow this leader? is his team as weak as he is? are lizard people real?
https://stellasplace1.com/2023/07/31/mark-levin-this-is-a-hit-job/
Mark reviews the ever mounting pile of bs…
(h/t: Stella’s Place)