The recently demoted Chuck Todd, who’s daytime show is now only on stream, ponders the great curiosity for his sheltered audience about whether abortion will swing the 2022 election in favor of the communist, left-wing, collective agenda.
Chuck Todd doesn’t have any actual data to frame his fairy tales, but fortunately CNN did a poll a few days ago of the exact questions puzzling NBC.
CNN did an extensive poll on this question of young people voting – [pdf here]
CTH pulled all the poll data into one easier to read infographic of the responses by age (below). The 18-to-34-year group are not single-issue voters.
31% of that age group say a candidate MUST agree with them on abortion, while 69% say abortion is only one of several factors or not much of a factor.
The 18–34-year group is also reasonably pragmatic. If Roe v Wade overturned, 21% say abortions likely to be banned where they live; 31% say likely harder but not banned; 26% say it wouldn’t make a difference; and 22% not sure what would happen where they live.
Wondering how many of the pro abortion women have watched Dr. Levatino congressional testimony.
He was an abortion Doctor.
He describes the procedure in graphic detail in less than 2 minutes. Video on YouTube.
Know a pro abortion person who believes the “it’s only a clump of cells ” lie….forward the YouTube to them…..
“It’s only a clump of cells ” is one of the greatest lies of the last century.
That is probably the most powerful, impactful, and disturbing videos that I’ve ever seen on the subject. Everybody should watch that. I can’t stress it enough…. Watch it.
Remember…not all states have/had laws that the baby had to have pain medication before procedure was done!
Barbaric.
No…
Thank you for reminding me about this. I had forgotten his name, but not the facts he presented; which turned me from pro-choice to pro-life. What they do to the unborn is sickening and disgusting.
I remember a rabid pro-choice journalist who attended the Gosnell trial. He could barely stay in the courtroom during the whole thing, leaving at intervals because he needed to vomit before he could return to the trial.
Afterwards, he publicly disavowed his stance. He wrote a long article on why. I’m sorry to say I cannot remember his name, but I did read it. It was very powerful.
Similar to the reporter (Man) who was VERY pro-choice, with his main argument being “especially in the case of RAPE!”,…until his Mom took him aside, and told him if she had used that criterion, he would NOT have been born.
Turned him right around!
If that clump of cells was found on Mars, all the Science! worshippers would proclaim that life was found on Mars. And if someone destroyed it, they would cry bloody murder. But these are the same people who lost their minds when a couple of drunk kids tipped over a balanced rock at a National Park. They wanted the death penalty — not for destroying the rock — but merely for changing the position of it.
Killing a baby though? Cool. Yeah, they’re evil, they know it, and they celebrate it.
I wonder if they thanked their mothers today for not aborting them?
I posted it somewhere yesterday.
If anyone can find it and re-post here, I think it’s a good one to share w/ Lib friends.
John Newton and Amazing Grace.
I am in tears. Thank you, gypsy.
My question which no one will ask because it is unansweable…
These wimmin all say they’re fighting for their “rights”as women. At the same time, they are killing their daughters who will never have any rights because they will never grow into women they say they want to protect.
How in the name of our God do they reconcile their grotesque rantings with that?
For people who pretend to not even know what a women is because they aren’t biologists, it is useless to demand any rational arguments. It is the same cognitive dissonance in simultaneously demanding equality for women in sports while also demanding trannies in women’s sports.
The common linkage in these policies is hatred of the existing culture. They just want to destroy it all.
I’m really not trying to get them to show any rational thought because, as you say, they are incapable of such.
What I would like to see is all the proponents of abortion who show up to be interviewed asked that one question. And I want to see it asked as the first question…just to see them fail to be able to answer it and thereby expose themselves for the vicious ghouls that they are.
The common linkage is media propagandists/ Demunists, using low self esteem people for power and control. By being part of the politically correct group, the low self esteem people get a sense of power and control in return.
Emotions. They don’t think. They act upon Emotions only. No logic. No rational thought.
And they usually have no common sense to begin with.
As they age the day I suspect will come when they’ll look back on their lives and regret. Who knows when that will happen. When all their friends are looking forward to seeing their grandchildren, and they remember the one they aborted so will never know any of theirs from the child that should have been? I don’t know.
But no one is immune to regrets. No one. What would be helpful are videos of those women who aborted willingly and who are overcome with the sorrow of it. Faces with stories, I think, would be very powerful.
Betsy and gypsybreeze, you’re both forgetting these people are satanic.
Asking them to recognize and ignore evil is like trying to get a dog to stop sniffing the butts of other dogs.
“these people are satanic.” Are you saying all people that have abortions are satanic? Who exactly is these people.
Thank you, two generations of American government schooling, for giving us young folk who are functionally braindead.
Correct. Leftists ’emote’. They don’t ‘think’. This is all you need to know and understand. Emoting is no way to go through life son….
why not advocate birth control? Easy, effective, inexpensive and you don’t have to murder innocents.
Because I think abortion is an absolute religion for them. I cannot, will not, ever understand it, although I have often wondered it myself. The ones who have multiple procedures confound me.
You’ve slipped into their terminology again Betsy. (I know, this is so sick that it’s hard to even discuss with true phrasing.)
“The ones who have multiple procedures confound me.”
You mean the serial killers?
Super spreaders..
Exactly. It comes in a wide variety, readily available and paid for by us who buy health insurance and pay taxes.
Agree….
Advocate for preventing.
Show that abortion does not end a pregnancy.
It ends a life.
Their entire ideology is a religion to them. Climate change too.
The ones on the left screaming the loudest are the same ones who are so unattractive no male would want to be anywhere close to them. Since the ugly purple haired sows can’t impregnate each other, it’s a safe bet they won’t need any type of birth control
Perhaps because using contraceptives requires folks to understand that their actions have consequences. Progressives believe humanity comes from nothing, and that at death one simply ceases to be. So why worry? In their pathetic lost world view, there is no judgment, no eternity, no regrets – because there is no higher power, no God, nothing but the occasional passing unicorn.
“If it makes you happy, then it can’t be that bad”, the GenZ anthem sung by Sheryl Crow (she of one square of toilet paper fame).
Ill-liberal men & especially women can’t think. At all. Ever. Their thought process doesn’t extend past their next orgasm. They rut like animals but they refuse the natural consequences.
You are correct. They come from a generation which were given a pass on anything and everything. No consequences. And this is what we get as a result.
The main purpose of abortion is to make possible behavior without lasting consequence. This is absolutely a requirement for happiness for some people who want to make bad decisions.
Abortion also helps eliminate undesirable populations, which has a couple different meanings.
They can’t say this however, so use slogans like “my body, my choice” and define it as women’s issue to invalidate the opinions of half the population they then don’t have to deal with.
These things are smokescreens … rhetorical devices DESIGNED to suppress opposition, and have nothing to do with the actual purpose. They are words used to exploit and misdirect the values of the opposition (us), who respect the the individual, accept social responsibility, expect accountability.
So they argue for forced vaccination-at-cost-of-job in one sentence, and then suddenly bodily autonomy for abortion in the next sentence.
Its easy to call them on it, but modern conseratives prefer to play along and deal with the left on whatever terms they present.
If you have ever had devious children, they do the same thing to manipulate their parents.
Good parents see through the manipulation. But conservatives choose to accept everything the left says at face value, perhaps puzzle out loud over why it makes no sense, but let it go. Just like bad parents who let Suzy cut up her clothes with scissors because she likes to work the scissors.
Do you hear much about how 38% of abortions are by black women, though they are only 14% of the childbearing population? Hugely disproportionate. How 40% of abortion facilities are in black neighborhoods, though they make up only 12% of the population?
Yet, conservatives sit there, somewhat dumbly, and argue — on the left’s terms — about trivialities like using “the n word” or slogans like “right to choose” DESIGNED to misdirect and suppress your thinking, and then also dumbly sit there and argue on the left’s terms about discrimination.
A big part of it is mental laziness by conservatives. A leftist can spend every moment of his life for decades thinking about sexual behavior, craft some message, then confront a conservative with it .
That conservative has spent zero time thinking about it (like any healthy person), and then accepts whatever the obssessed/mentally ill leftist tells him: “whatever two consenting adults decide is fine, as long as no one gets hurt”.
If the conservative thought about it, he would ask “Why should consent matter to me? Why is it wrong if someone gets hurt? If I want to hurt someone, so what. Who are you to impose your beliefs on me?”
Forcing them to answer such questions out loud where everyone can hear would expose the poverty of their reasoning.
Instead conservatives accept it because on the surface it seems to align with the idea of individual rights. Then suddenly its gay marriage, you kid being pulled aside by homsexual counselors in school, instructed in transsexual ideology ar age 5″, etc.
Escalates just like little Suzy, when the parents accept her destructive scissors fetish.
Don’t waste time wondering about the incoherence and nconsistency of the left’s “arguments”. They aren’t arguments. They are ALWAYS propaganda DESIGNED to exploit and misdirect their opposition. Instead, go beyond the surface of their words and look at reality.
What has happened in the west is that the scum of the world (that have always existed) are now ascendent and running the show due to the laziness of decent people who have been negligent, forgotten their basis, and are now starting to see the world the scum create.
Your stats about the black population percentage vis-a-vis the abortion rate shows the success of Margaret Sanger’s foundational goal at Planned Parenthood. Eugenics. But never rayciss.
Sangers foundation would have been way more successful in fulfilling her stated objectives if the government would quit paying the least capable among us to have babies.
If you want to infer that I’m just talking about black women, you’d be wrong. Poor people in general have more abortions. Why would these people take the time and effort required to have protected sex when the left never forces them to take responsibility for anything.” Modern leftist doctrine #1. Nothing is ever your fault.
I read your reply after I made the above comment about the failure to hold these people to account. in other words, the consequences you mention. I waste no time whatsoever on wondering why Leftists do what they do, believe me. I watch them and am utterly repelled. I turn away from them the way I would turn from satan.
It’s the babies I am concerned about. The souls which God meant to be but will now not exist.
A very nice post.
Responsibility is something that appears to be lacking in the pro choice.
I finally began telling people—I don’t care about your body and your choice—I am fighting for the innocent child you want murdered.
Good for you, gypsy. I bet you get many blank looks.
“Do you hear much about how 38% of abortions are by black women, though they are only 14% of the childbearing population? Hugely disproportionate. How 40% of abortion facilities are in black neighborhoods, though they make up only 12% of the population?”
I’m almost 100% certain that’s not just a black women issue.
Tell them they should be grateful their mothers did not hold the same belief.
I’ve seen several hold up signs which say they wish their mothers had aborted them. For shock value? I’d really hate to think I’d reared such creatures.
Sadly from what I have witnessed, they actually believe that same aborted baby will just be born later, when they choose to have a child…YES they actually believe this!
They don’t want to think about what actually happens…that’s how.
The funny thing about having a controlled opposition (ie, the GOP) is that it makes it easier to swallow your own propaganda. The GOP has acted as if all leftwing social policies have massive popular support. For any leftist looking outside the echo chamber, the GOP reassures them that they can just keep pushing ahead.
The left will have to do a repeat of the Newsom recall election in California where early polls showed the population there was fed up with COVID fascism. They will arrange the polls to show a dramatic (and unexplained) reversal followed by massive cheating. This works in California because nobody (meaning the GOP) will fight back.
This provides context for why the GOP in all the battleground states where mass ballot fraud flipped the 2020 election is doing so much to keep the cheating machinery intact. Throw in deliberate GOP sabotage (the 2018 vote where “get out the vote” efforts where suppressed or underfunded) and you can keep Democrat losses minor enough to retain control over Congress.
And they over sampled Democrats as usual.
The Narrative Engineers – Woodrow Wilson Propagandist progeny.
I agree. They must have oversampled Dems because the party alignment question is way off:
Dem. 44%
Repub. 32%
Ind. 24%
Dems do not have a 10% party affiliation advantage nationwide.
Plus I bet a huge majority of those independents are conservatives who don’t like what the GOPe is about. In can’t imagine many libs not liking their party. It’s delivering on all they could have hoped for in their wildest dreams.
He’s just gross looking. I can’t stand to watch him (Chuck Todd). Why is he such a big deal?
There is an Obama connection in there somewhere with his wife, I believe.
Todd is part of the club.
As someone famous once quipped “it’s the economy, stupid”
Times have changed but the Democrats are clueless about how views on abortion have evolved. Couples are spending small fortunes for IVF treatments; some single women WANT to be mothers; ultrasound belies the “clump of cells” claim; women have entered the workforce in huge numbers and can support themselves; employers offer day care, etc., etc., etc. Democrats have beat this horse prior to elections for decades but the gig is probably up — they just can’t accept it (like so much else).
I think the big question is how different these numbers are than they would have been a couple weeks ago. Regardless, I am dismayed by how overwhelmingly pro choice our young people are. I thought things were swinging back 🙁
That generation is the most brain washed. They wore masks religiously, got vaccinated enthusiastically, and condemned others who did not. They must not believe in birth control.
Young people do not turn out to vote. Trying to get young people out to vote is a fool’s errand.
Old people vote, and the sky is blue.
Even during the Vietnam War, when the draft was a huge issue for young people, they did not turn out to vote.
Higher voter turnout among the young is always predicted. Never happens.
During most of the Vietnam War, 10-19-year-olds who could be drafted could not vote. When they lowered the voting age to 18, the war ended soon afterward.
“Oh noes, now Twitter is not going to be helping us either.” `~ upChuck Todd.
He joins the head whiner in Ireland, President Higgins, who just said “Is it a great success that a multi-billionaire would be now deciding what is appropriate for people to exchange by way of discourse? I think it can hardly be described as anything other than a manifestation of an incredible and dangerous narcissism.”
What a goofball! I’m quickly losing my respect for Ireland.
It found modernity. There was a time the great German writer Heinrich Boll called it closer to heaven than anyplace on earth. Not so now-more like everywhere else. Still, it has its bit of magic.
Joe, Ireland was lost many years ago. They’ve been Europeanized”. Believe me, that’s not a good thing.
“Is it a great success that a multi-billionaire would be **now** deciding what is appropriate…?
What the bloody hell does he think has been going on ever since Google, et al. took root?
Not tryin’ to be ugly, but is that Bernie Sanders’ dwarf brother?
Mini Mao.
The abortionists are just a thrill kill cult and Up Chuck knows it.
Ramp up anti Potus actions
False flags
Rile up BLM
Meet Depressed sofa kingdom.
I think the father of the fetus needs to be included, because I believe most abortions are due to the other parent’s abandonment. Want an abortion..fine. Give me the father’s contact info so he knows…and he must attend the surgery with the mother of his “fetus”….
.
This is the privacy argument.
The ‘right to privacy’ means a woman must keep it to herself, period.
If she breaches that privacy, herself — i.e., tells the father she is pregnant — then HE gets a CHOICE in the matter, also.
If she breaches that privacy after having an abortion — i.e., waltzes around celebrating and glorifying the act — then she cannot whine if she is righteously judged as to that confession.
.
Unfortunately, these days too often it’s just some guy she hooked up with through a dating app and wants nothing more to do with.
.
Next month my wife and I visit her liberal brothers and sister in Texas. Pray for us. And them too. We survived last year but don’t remember how.
This is such great news. They thought after the leak everyone would be up in arms. It’s the economy stupid.
Whether we like it, or approve of it, or not, historically there have always been women who have chosen to terminate an unwanted pregnancy. Prior to Roe, women of means were able to fly to Japan or elsewhere, for these procedures. Women who couldn’t afford this chose far more dangerous means. Initially, the societal idea behind Roe was termination during the first trimester. Period. No one thought it was morally acceptable to have the procedure done any later than 13 weeks, and normally felt that even earlier was better. Frankly, I don’t understand the big deal about overturning Roe on the federal level. It would be simple enough to go to a state that would provide the procedure.
When Roe vs Wade was passed Sonograms weren’t invented yet.
Women were told its just a clump of cells.
We now have Sonograms which prove that was one of the greatest lies of last century.
We also know there is a heartbeat at 24 days.
In this Century we also have umpteen different types of birth control.
Old geezers like Warren, Pelosi, Hillary, Bernie, etc….they keep spreading the lies. Warren actually once compared abortion to getting your tonsils taken out. Someone needs to sit them down and bring them into—this Century.
Accurate science will help your understanding better. There is no ‘heart’ at 24 weeks. https://www.livescience.com/65501-fetal-heartbeat-at-6-weeks-explained.html
And the sonogram was invented in the 1950’s. It would appear that your argument, however well meaning, just fell apart.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3987368/
We live in a metro area that houses the only PP left in MO. Twice a month we take her brother out to shop as he lives in a Catholic group home just 6 blocks away. Whenever we pass we always honk and raise our fists to the great folk who have been protesting for years. As I did not go with her last week, she said the protestors had been removed, replaced by many armed guards.
It really amazes me that abortion would a topic for discussion on the Sunday talks on Mothers Day. Kinda macabre isn’t it?
Yes, ironic. Always call that Democrat slush fund outfit Planned Non-Parenthood.
A quick history lesson from 50+ years ago: at first Communists said that abortion should be legal because “it is not a child, it’s a fetus.”
Back then, when intelligent and zealous Conservatives existed in greater numbers, this argument was quickly destroyed: “If a ‘fetus’ is not human, what is it? A watermelon? A monkey? Prove to me that humans do NOT give birth to humans.”
Then they switched to: “It’s part of a woman’s body, so she can do what she wants!”
This was countered with: “No, if so, would you let a woman cut off her arms or legs, if she so demanded? An unborn child is CONNECTED to its mother, but is obviously not a part of her body. If so, how precisely does the child become independent of the mother’s body?”
So the Communists changed the battleground: “Irrelevant, whether it’s human or a part of the woman’s body: a woman has the right to choose what happens in her body!”
And we know what happened!
Our priest today said that in our struggles in Life, we must be like eagles capturing snakes:
“The eagle does not fight the snake on the ground. He changes the battleground by flying the snake into the air, where the snake has no power! He drops the snake, powerless, into the air to its death.”
His spiritual point was that by “changing our battlefields” (i.e. negative mind-sets and biases and defeatist attitudes) we can find the proper paths.
Today we need to change the battlefield back to A Human Life cannot be ended by another person’s ‘Choice’.
Because “choice” is simply a euphemism for “killing the unborn.”
Every time a Communist says “a woman’s right to choose,” we must counter them with “You mean: to kill her unborn child!“
For too many years this murderous euphemism has masked the Truth of a slaughter worthy of Moloch worshippers: it is time to fly it into the air and let it writhe in agony as it crashes to its death.
Because you know that all DEM states will become even greater slaughterhouses of children, unborn and born: New York State Legislature, I accuse you of willful, even gleeful, infanticide!
We need to become the eagles flying the snakes into the air and dropping them to their doom.
“Today we need to change the battlefield back to A Human Life cannot be ended by another person’s ‘Choice’.”
US law says that life begins at conception, and that the Federal Government is obligated to prosecute anyone who takes a life in utero (unless the assault was a “medical procedure”)
————————
18 U.S. Code § 1841 – Protection of unborn children
(a)(1) Whoever engages in conduct that violates any of the provisions of law listed in subsection (b) and thereby causes the death of, or bodily injury (as defined in section 1365) to, a child, who is in utero at the time the conduct takes place, is guilty of a separate offense under this section….
(d) As used in this section, the term “unborn child” means a child in utero, and the term “child in utero” or “child, who is in utero” means a member of the species homo sapiens, at any stage of development, who is carried in the womb.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1841
They are caught by the word “choice.”
The difference between manslaughter and murder is that murder involves conscious and purposeful willing. It is called mens rea, and could also be called choice.
A person who has committed vehicular homicide, with no intention whatsoever to cause any harm or loss of life, has not made a choice to kill. The loss of life was an accident, not a choice.
Safe legal, and rare…said the lawyers who celebrated Roe v Wade. From that to murdering babies in the womb up to birth or after (fetal cell line HEK-293 from a female born alive then butchered for the part they wanted), to harvesting parts of a baby and selling them on, big business I believe.
Is that what these monsters are afraid of? Overturn Roe first, then on to making it a criminal offense to harvest? I can only pray so. The sooner the better.
No matter what any poll says, I believe that overturning Roe v. Wade will seriously damage the Republicans’ chance of winning at the midterms. Although it is clear that the Democrat party is a criminal organization, many people will not vote for abortion opponents, since it will curtail their own freedom.
Besides, Roe v. Wade was not wrongly decided. It was based on the right to privacy; basically, if I have an abortion, that is none of your business, even if you think I am killing my own baby. You might say that the right to privacy is not mentioned in the Consitution. This is true, but the Ninth Amendment says: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
Fifty years ago, the Supreme Court acknowledged that the right to privacy exists; perhaps, it does not acknowledge it any more; the principle of stare decisis usually prevents such changes of mind. Be that as it may, the Republicans’ electoral chances will be damaged, and that makes me unhappy.
Wrong on all accounts
I agree with your first paragraph, but the rest indicates that you did not read Alito’s draft.
Privacy was not the issue and Alito’s draft went to great pains to state that, e.g. explicitly stating that his opinion affects Griswold not at all. The issue was that abortion involves a unique situation not analogous to anything else, cannot be deemed to be grounded purely in privacy rights because of the existence of another human being (as recognized by Roe!), did not involve any other right that could be found that was incorporated through the 14th Amendment to the states, and that abortion therefore remains within the province of the people to decide through their state legislatures and constitutions.
.
All of what you say does not change the fact that this will damage the Republicans’ chances of winning the midterms. Winning the midterms is an absolute must so as to stop the criminal behavior by the Democrat party.
At worst it may reduce flipped seats some, like 46 instead of 54.
It will not have the desired effect the Democrats are hoping for.
Guess we’ll just have to wait and see.
Perhaps, but I believe the real disaster will happen at the state level. And that will make it easier for Democrats to cheat in future elections.
The can has been kicked down the road for 50 years resulting in millions of deaths. Others have mentioned R v W started with the intention of being limited to the first trimester. We see how that has been pushed to the point of abortions being performed with all but the head of the baby being out of the birth canal.
Regardless of federal law, there are also now more ways the federal government is involved in financing abortion with what is taken from me in taxes.
No politician running in a midterm seemed to care.
Some states like Colorado have since passed a law allowing late term abortions. First trimester does not even enter into these ghouls thinking.
Criminal behavior by the Democrats is being reduced after those 50 years, but you are afraid it might affect elections…to..stop other…criminal behavior?
Gee. If we support what we have been promising for 50 years, we might not get elected?
“Abortion is just not the winning issue Democrats had hoped it was…”
Well, maybe they can go all-in on “gun control” again?!
They say the Abortion Issue is about the definition of Murder vs My Body, My Choice.”
I don’t know the current state of the Science, but what would the Pro-Abortion side be chanting if —-
— the fetus could be safely removed from 2 months of age + incubated artificially + brought to term + then adopted at “birth”….
…+ what if it were all paid for by Pro-Life Groups including churches + other charities + humanitarian groups —- without even the $ the Government is pumping into the abortion industry to make it more affordable to kill pre-born babies…?
The “My Body, My Choice” argument should vanish. The woman gets her body back minus the living thing growing inside it. The living thing gets to live. Gets to survive to become an adult with a tiny bit of luck. A family that can’t have children or want more gets one. And so on…
Would the Pro-Abortionist cheer if such technology were widely available + used?
Of course not. — Even if females could have a fetus removed about the same time they realize they are pregnant in the first place — the inability to legally slaughter fetuses at will at any point prior to birth would —- drive them crazy. They would still be chanting “My Body, My Choice” because there is a vicious bloodlust on their side for the murder of children…..
……something that is frighteningly common in human civilizations over the ages + around the world…
Human + Child Sacrifices recur throughout recorded history + the archeological record.
The idea you can’t legally force someone to have a medical procedure since their side is screaming for the government to force people to get mRNA shots + wear masks + so on…
.
I think perhaps you go too far.
It’s not “bloodlust”. It’s more along the selfish self-centered lines of “I don’t want a baby now. I also don’t want to go through a pregnancy. I also don’t want to have to live with the knowledge that my child is alive somewhere out there. I just want it all to go away. Don’t tell me anything more, I don’t want to know and I just don’t care.”
.
Possible but I don’t really think so. How does the knowledge that your former fetus taken about the same time you realized you were pregnant outweigh the knowledge that you destroyed that fetus which could have been a normal functioning adult one day?
I’m also not talking about the Average Person who has an abortion. I’m talking about the Activists + the more politically minded women who they convince Abortion is a God-given human right.
We are basically at the point where science could provide the situation I outlined. The bigger issue would be that the Technocrats would then want the state/medical system to be more + more in control of reproduction as a whole – along the lines of Brave New World + other Futurist “fiction” where they have let us in on the plans of the Elites.
But — the Bloodlust is also undeniable if you just step back from being involved intimately in today’s day-to-day living.
Look back at the recorded history of civilizations…
Human Sacrifice + Child Sacrifice are a ——- recurring feature — of human civilization.
It is still not unheard of today in parts of the world.
Why do we not consider some of what we see put on display in the Abortion “Debate” —- in a similar light…?
Why do you believe there is little to none of the human motivation to sacrifice/kill children in the minds of some women who get abortions? You can find Tik Tok or other videos of women expressing it….
I know it is revolting to the mind of a moral person to consider it.
The taboo of pedophilia is one of the pedophiles best weapons. People are so revolted at even attempting to think about the horrors involved with pedophilia — they won’t want to hear about it at all…….but it goes on everywhere continuously……and the silence is a big benefit to it.
Why is the idea that contemporary Western Civilization has socio-psychological elements related to the bloodlusts of prior eras too far fetched?
Chuck Toad is a liar and a loser. He literally offers NOTHING of added value to ANYTHING.
A couple thoughts here.
1. The Roe Effect. In general, liberal women have been aborting their babies while conservative women have been having theirs. As a consequence, the trend is for there to be more conservative minded children to be raised than liberal minded ones.
2. I could have been aborted. Children today are increasingly aware that they are alive because their mothers chose to carry them to term. They can ask themselves the question, what if I had been aborted?
I think these two things make young people increasingly find abortion distasteful. Liberal women are killing off their offspring while conservative women are raising a greater proportion of the next generation.
(Democrat KKK) Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam Defends Leaving Infants to Die After Birth
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/laurettabrown/2019/01/30/virginia-gov-ralph-northam-defends-infanticide-n2540495
If you were watching TV News in the 1950’s and early 60’s the drug Thalidomide was part of the almost daily drum beat for abortions because of the birth defects it caused, it was prescribed to pregnant women for nausea. I grew up with some of these children that had these birth defects and for the most part they grew up to be very well adjusted and productive members of society. They adapted to their defects. The abortionists will use any excuse to kill the children because that is who they are, cold blooded killers.
It has always been about population control.
Had a thalidomide baby in my Sunday School class.
Nice kid. Cute face.
Wheelchair and shriveled/nearly non-existent arms and legs.
If you were to accidentally destroy a sea turtle or bald eagle egg you’d spend a good part of the next three years in federal prison!
Ironic that they claim they have absolute right to do as the wish to their child when they are first born, but when they go to school, they have no rights to oppose the teachers.
Abortion is the classic issue that shows the delusion and lies of left-wing politics. Their inability to comprehend the truth of any situation allows incredible evils to be committed such as the mass murder of unborn children.
I almost want a personhood amendment to put it all to rest but unfortunately that would implicitly suggest the govt the power to determine what makes a person, power which belongs to God alone – and with this govt that’s awfully scary…
.
“Person” under the law is a term of art that also applies to corporations. So apparently it has been established that the government already has that power.
Apparently the government also has the power to restrict constitutional rights of persons, individuals, even citizens deemed to be incompetent by mental infirmity or age. AGE. That is why children do not necessarily have even fundamental rights such as the right to determine where they will live, who they will associate with, to vote, to marry, to own property, to determine their own medical treatment, to a panoply of liberties. These rights only become recognized and accrue with age.
The question then remains: at what age does a child have a government-protected right to life. Alito says that is up to the states to decide, grounded in a legally-supportable rationale.
.
Haven’t heard a peep from the Pope on this topic 🤔
Poor Toad, nobody cares.
Looking at Sundance’s data table excerpt is most interesting, as the 6 questions presented can be broken into 3 distinct contexts. The results are disturbing.
Questions 017 and 020 essentially ask do you favor abortion? It is very decisive that the US Favors abortion being legal.
Questions 10 and 022 deal with the impact of the decision, if the courts overturn Roe v Wade, in terms of States passing laws regarding availability. The majority seem to feel there will be legalized abortion to some extent.
Questions 9 and 12 deal with importance of the decision, with a clear majority indicating they could care less one way or the other. I find this disturbing given that abortion is favorably viewed in the other two groups of questions. This strikes me as a sign of abosulte apathy and a profound lack of a moral compass in potentially the majority of the US or at least the respondents to this poll.
I get the sense that when people like Letitia James so she’s proud of killing her baby, and those cheering partial-birth abortion – not that many people relate. In that, I believe fewer would fight for it.
Looking at Sundance’s data table excerpt is most interesting, as the 6 questions presented can be broken into 3 distinct contexts. The results are disturbing.
Questions 017 and 020 essentially ask do you favor abortion? It is very decisive that the US Favors abortion being legal.
Questions 10 and 022 deal with the impact of the decision, if the courts overturn Roe v Wade, in terms of States passing laws regarding availability. The majority seem to feel there will be legalized abortion to some extent.
Questions 9 and 12 deal with importance of the decision, with a clear majority indicating they could care less one way or the other. I find this disturbing given that abortion is favorably viewed in the other two groups of questions. This strikes me as a sign of abosulte apathy and a profound lack of a moral compass in potentially the majority of the US or at least the respondents to this poll.
Noticed the near total disregard for the emotions & concerns of the men or boys involved with abortion?
Like so many issues today; nobody cares or wants to know any other point of view; ITS MY WAY OR TOTAL WAR!
If I don’t get my way, I’ll make everybody regret crossing me, for I am the most important person in the World!
Just one of the many issues causing these same people to build anger; troubling days ahead!
I hope they do more of this….maybe in front of a Congressional hearing
Couldn’t find a black doll?
1st question before accepting the results of a CNN poll … what is the composition of the sample? How skewed or oversampled are Democrats? Usually these polls are heavily skewed to have D+8-14 samples.
Democrats are dumb devious people.
I have no respect for them.
That’s what the abortion leak was all about…cover to steal the mid terms in certain swing districts.
“Chuck Todd doesn’t have any actual data to frame his fairy tales, but fortunately CNN did a poll a few days ago of the exact questions puzzling NBC.”
I guess he deserves to be where he was demoted to.
Does this seem like its “a feature, not a bug” all part of a carefully laid out and executed PLAN by “SMART” evil people who know exactly what THEY are doing,..where the outcome is predetirmined,..and they are “winning”?
Or, does this SCOTUS leak, and the resulting feeble attempt to use Abortion as a midterm election issue, like the Un-select committee on Insurrection dud, like the Ukraine manipulation falling flat, all seem “of a piece” and indicate DESPERATION and CLUELESSNESS coming from people who have no contact with reality, are acting in ways that are harmful to themselves and others, are NOT “smart” but are of only mediocre intellect or talent, in other words Insane Idiots In Charge?
Granted, we SHOULD “KNOW the enemy”, and “never underestimate the enemy”, but KNOWING the enemy means viewing them realistically, and realistically they ARE INSANE IDIOTS IN CHARGE. That is NOT an underestimation, it is an ACCURATE accessment.
Prove me wrong, please.
Evil, YES,…But “smart”? I am just not seeing it, at all.
This really is a spiritual battle with physical components. The federal blessing America has given to abortion (Roe v Wade)is really a blood sacrifice to lucifer. It has given him a title deed to this nation. The bitterness and disorder present today is a direct result of our national switch of allegiance from God to satan starting in the 60s. Just as food shortages and starvation will change how the American public responds to politics, so the left, comprised of both democrats and republicans, is sensing a denial of it food source – the bodies and blood of children- in this upcoming battle on abortion. We must not underestimate the panic and violence in these people when their sustenance is removed.
The one-issue voter issue aside, I would find these numbers depressing were CNN not their source.
These numbers look to me like there is overwhelming support for the unconstitutional Roe vs Wade decision. This surprises me. Not. I think only a small percentage of Americans have even read the Constitution and even less have ever heard of “The Federalist Papers”. Repugs get hammered on this issue in every election cycle. It is depressing to watch 90% of the happenings in Washington DC these days. If you care about human life you are appalled by the yip yip yip about a very depressing fact of life. But I don’t think very many people care about much of anything and just mindlessly go through the motions of life.
Chuck looks like he’s been drinkin’ hard.
There was nothing more satisfying than canceling my Citibank Costco account and my Amazon Prime membership today. Now… about those pesky Federal income taxes. I usually claim Single and Zero and get a refund back. Maybe I just claim EXEMPT and if I owe anything at the end of the year, pay it… at the very last minute! I sure wish them all lots of luck with their future customers, assuming they don’t abort them all.
LIST: Companies covering abortion travel costs for employees | KTLA
https://thelibertydaily.com/cowardly-chief-justice-john-roberts-is-pressuring-conservative-justices-to-save-roe-v-wade-and-kill-more-babies/
FTA “Chief Justice John Roberts, who has at times sided with the liberal wing of the court, still appears set to oppose the decision, with the report noting that Roberts was still attempting to persuade Coney Barrett and Kavanaugh to take a more incremental approach to allowing abortion restrictions.
John Roberts is trying to build his legacy for the history books. He doesn’t want it all overshadowed by a decision that he didn’t personally support, so he’s trying to sway the court to the middle like the pale and feckless weakling that he is.”
Doesn’t surprise me that the corrupt Chief Justice is trying to do to Roe v Wade what he did to Obamacare!! Further it won’t surprise me if Kavanaugh and/or ACB cave! The protests were all planned in advance to weaken the weak links!! I pray not!!!
From Gateway
Reports Indicate Justice Alito and His Family Have Been Moved to a Secure Location