The supreme court has taken a knee… let me explain why it is so evident:
In a 6-3 ruling today the U.S. Supreme Court has refused to grant writ to hear the Pennsylvania election challenge cases [pdf here – begin page 25]. While the majority of media will likely celebrate this decision; and while the court has refused to hear the case(s) based on their position the issues are “moot”; there appears to be an underlying motive not being discussed.
It only takes four justices to agree to hear a case and grant a writ of certiorari. In October 2020 the issues with the Pennsylvania court overruling the Pennsylvania legislature was of such importance four justices agreed to block the lower court order. However, four months later the majority claim the arguments within the case are “moot”; & the election is over.
In essence the Roberts Court is saying they will allow any/all methods and manipulations of election law within states, and only look to the state outcome. This is very troublesome.
Why would Justice Kavanaugh reverse his position? In October the state action to supersede the Pennsylvania legislature was a hazard. In February it is moot.
While it is never a good idea to look into the background of the court for motives, one cannot easily dismiss that Roberts, Kavanaugh and Barrett may have voted against the writ because they were concerned such a decision would cause the senate to start a process of “packing the court.” Retaining the current number of justices within the court is more likely if the justices avoid triggering the consequences from the previous threat.
Justices’ Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch remained consistent with their earlier decisions to hear the cases and settle the disputes. Barrett never weighed in on the October injunction, but Kavanaugh has completely reversed his position with his denial of the writ.
Succinct encapsulation from Justice Thomas:
Here’s the embed of the decision. The PA case starts at page #25.
I just realized the execrable SCOTUS deliberately stalled sending this out. This took no time, effort, or thought so they could have ducked responsibility last Friday.
Instead they waited until Feb. 22nd, on George Washington’s birthday to hammer more nails into The Constitution’s coffin, deliberate in-your-face ugliness.
Communists LOVE their symbology!
Communists ?
Make it Satanists .
FIFY.
So, did they get their 30 pieces of silver for selling out God and country to the Godless communists?
If they haven’t yet, they will.
The argument that Amy and Brett went along with Roberts on this because they were afraid that if they didn’t, the Dems would retaliate by packing the court makes Amy and Brett sound more human than may deserve. After all, if they had taken ANY of the election fraud cases, they might have forced a true recount in the swing states, and Trump might still be president. Then they wouldn’t have had to worry about court-packing at all. So, if this is their excuse, I would say that, at the very least, they brought it on themselves. They also are revealing themselves to be completely self-centered, more concerned about how much individual power and influence they may or may not have in the future vs. how much collective power and influence We the People have with our votes.
If one gets the same result by threatening to pack the court as by packing it…one no longer has a need to pack the court…they already have 7 corrupt and controlled Justices!
Avoids all the negative court packing optics, but with the same effective result!!!
They failed in their duty to see the over-riding importance of these cases to the electoral process which now stands in tatters, and is incredible. Who among us believes that tampering bolsters and secures it, or that when the tampering is allowed to stand, it leaves the door open for more to occur? Only those who benefited from the outcome on Jan. 6th would be my answer. That benefit will be short-lived. They also failed in being impartial arbiters dedicated to rule of law, regardless what the [D]s in power at the moment may scheme to make changes to the SCOTUS by packing the bench. These failures need to be pointed out because there will be consequences for them, some of which are likely coming soon. Thank you for a great comment Clara.
“Retaining the current number of justices within the court is more likely if the justices avoid triggering the consequences from the previous threat. . .”
Which basically means, they/ve already decided to surrender. Can we now expect the Supreme Court to forthrightly defend 1st Amendment rights? 2nd Amendment rights? It’s going to be kinda hard to un-ring that bell, I think. The idea of a free and independent America just got a little dimmer.
And the Democrats will probably pack the court anyway.
hadn’t thought of that and you’re right.
The way the “conservative” judges in the SC are voting NOW leads me to believe it won’t make a difference anymore if the Dems DO pack the Court!
Same outcome.
The problem here is that our government officials do not fear ‘We The People’. As long as they have control of the vote counting, they have nothing to fear!
Good point Clara. If their assertion is so, their demurral would be a mere ostentatious post-theft closing of the barn door.
they should have let them try to pack the court. even if they had succeeded then the Republicans could retaliate by doing in kind. And that’s still an IF they had succeeded. the last time a Democrat tried this maneuver their own party shot it down.
Well said!!
The soapbox has been denied to us.
The ballot box has been stolen from us
The jury box has abandoned us
Only one box left.
Use it or lose it.
Ask your friends in Australia and the UK.
I understand German citizens lost the right too in the 1930s.
“It never repeats, but it often rhymes!”
So one wonders if Lawfare is writing these SC findings? I can’t imagine using the word “moot” to describe why they can’t investigate election fraud is a legal term?
No, the petitions for writs of certiorari in the Pennsylvania cases were denied with no explanation.
“The motions of Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. for leave to intervene as petitioner are dismissed as moot. The motions of Thomas J. Randolph, et al. for leave to intervene as respondents are dismissed as moot.”
The interventions are moot because there will be no hearing.
Dispossession is 9/10’s of the law of the jungle.
“Retaining the current number of justices within the court is more likely if the justices avoid triggering the consequences from the previous threat.”
https://youtu.be/hQ95ffnU4Sw
“moot”
So in other words,
At this point
what difference does it make ~> !
It doesn’t , so pack the damn court!
So what the hell. I mean…. you just give them what they want so they don’t take it? If we have real elections then we can fight court packers.
We can re-pack.
THEIR SOLUTION IS MY VOTE-LESS SLAVERY?
How about a coalition of Red State Governors? See my post over a long time ago on this site when all of the sanctuary bullcrap started to happen. That’s what they did and you ended up with grandma and grandpa passing away needlessly in nursing homes because uniparty state governors coalesced together.
Cuomo wanted to get rid of Medicaid grannies. Less money for them, more for him.
I always said Trump should of picked Protestant judges from the heartland of America.
Yeah, that’s the ticket. Put a good Lutheran, Presbyterian or Methodist, etc. Globalist in there. That’ll work.
dang. Why didn’t *I * think of that?
Fwiw, i agree with BJ, only because practicing Catholics are accustomed to and good with a hierarchical organization; top down. Whereas Protestants are definitely not accustomed to nor accepting of previous. Not a religious issue to me, but merely one of individualism vs…
Sorry, there’s no explaining away all the Protestants who have fallen for being subjugated to the SJW’s and their Globalist Masters.
Individualists come in every race, sex, religion, etc. and so do Anti-Individualists.
Alito and Thomas are Catholic, as was Scalia. Unfortunately, there are also cowards on the Court who are Catholic, and at least one CINO. This Pope claims to be Catholic too.
Indeed, cowardice comes in all religious guises. If rights for the unborn are ever before the court watching ACB will be instructive. If she takes a knee on that, then all her professed Catholicism is only good on Sundays.
One look at the communist pope says a lot.
This is an EXCELLENT point and one which explains the terrible governments of most South American countries. Hierarchical top-down governments. Corruption abounds. No tradition of representative gov.
And a civil law base, no presumption of innocence, jury trial, etc. Napoleonic law.
At this point, I would take robot judges running on software to issue judicial decisions.
Completely agree.
This is the illegitimate A$$ that stole our election. The one that so many on our SC are happy to just hand the reigns over to, no questions asked.
Biden arrested at 21 for going into Senate Chamber and sitting in Presiding Officers chair.
https://twitter.com/mbracemoore/status/1363528715444092934?s=20
And think of it – years later I would become President because I framed a bunch of people who walked into the House! These things you learn, they never get old!
scotus has again ruled against the Constitution, and therefore the People, as it has been doing numerous times for the last 150 years.
Not the lower case letters, as they do not deserve other.
QUESTION:
Have ALL the SC election cases been denied, or just the PA. one?
I ask, because I’m seeing conflicting statements. I thought some were still out there for consideration.
Docket 20-740 is aPennsylvania case still out there
A March 15 conferency
From the article: “While it is never a good idea to look into the background of the court for motives, one cannot easily dismiss that Roberts, Kavanaugh and Barrett may have voted against the writ because they were concerned such a decision would cause the senate to start a process of “packing the court.””
If this is true, then they (Roberts, Kavanaugh and Barrett) have given the enemies of the U.S. Constitution the perfect way to control the U.S. Supreme Court– just threaten to “pack it” in order to get SCOTUS decisions favorable to them.
I thought these justices are supposed to be the “creme de la creme”, the brightest of the bright. If that is their reasoning then the only thing I can say is that they are rather stupid people. In fairness to them, I firmly believe the deep state establishment has quite a bit of information on them that they don’t want seen in “the light of day”. What say you?
Weak and cowardly more than stupid.
Afraid. Fearful for family. Threatened.
SCOTUS is telling us that the only way for Constitution loving people to “win” an election now is to get Constitution lovers manning the Dominion Machines, etc.
You make it sound like the powers that be would allow that to happen.
I’m sure you would be arrested for voter fraud..
Maybe Kavanaugh really IS THE SCUMBAG THEY SAID HE WAS.
IS BRET KAVANAUGH THE RYAN LEAF OF THE SUPREME COURT???
excellent analysis.
ACB is just as bad if not worse.
They will pack the court anyway…they need to in order to enforce their unconstitutional assault on the 1st, 2nd and 4th Amendments.
Cowards everywhere….
Our only recourse then is to start cheating. And I know we can do it better than the left.
“While it is never a good idea to look into the background of the court for motives, one cannot easily dismiss that Roberts, Kavanaugh and Barrett may have voted against the writ because they were concerned such a decision would cause the senate to start a process of “packing the court.” Retaining the current number of justices within the court is more likely if the justices avoid triggering the consequences from the previous threat.”
Doesn’t this Conservative Tree House article basically make the claim that Supreme Court justices can be blackmailed and if so, what is the point of a Supreme Court anymore?
Hoping that I can upload a meme I just created without trashing the edge of the page. Here goes:
You did it!!!
Thank You!!
Maybe leave instructions for others? Those HUGE pics are bugging me.
I think but not positive, pic size is found in URL. If so, then you can change size in URL.
I am using postimages.org. When you are about to upload your picture, they have a size selection menu whose first item is Do not resize my picture.
The option I chose in the menu is 320×240 (for web sites and email). I guessed it would be a good size to fit within the CTH text column.
The next one up is 640×480 – that one says “for message boards.” I suspect it’s the size that tends to spread out too far to the right, but now that I have one that shows successfully, I will not be experimenting further…
use the same program. but they still don’t go,even resized. can you give me the skinny period. once you get the url then what?
You need to copy the URL that ends in .jpg. I think it’s the third one down in the list, but because I’m not posting a picture right now, I can’t see it. Only a URL that ends in .jpg works on CTH.
(If you’re not sure which link has the .jpg, you can copy and paste it somewhere else, such as a text or word processing document, just to look at it first.)
Then you simply paste it into your comment, making sure that you have a return character both before and after it, and that it’s all on its own line.
i’ve tried to get pics in with html. doesn’t work or i’m doing something wrong. how did you do it period?!
You need to upload a picture first to a posting site like postimages.org. You can’t simply upload a picture straight into CTH.
Someone here suggested postimages.org during the big 2.0 transition – I signed up then – in fact, I signed up with my previous email address, and just fixed my signin there to my new one with ease. The site is free.
And yes, he smashed Lady Liberty up good.
She’s done.
Might it be as simple as Kavanaugh and Barrett have young children living in DC along with the 95% of people who hate Trump and they didn’t want any problems in their social spheres? Life can go on now.
That is NOT an excuse.
If they were really terrified cuz of threats, they should move out of the country.
More honorable than throwing the whole country under the Corruption Bus.
A handful of people (2 families) leaving the country is waaaaay better than f*cking almost 300 million over for eternity.
Both families are wealthy enough to go live comfortably elsewhere.
Oh hell no that is not an excuse. That is not even a valid reason. What if our Founding Fathers had had the same attitude? People used to say that Flynn pled guilty to make it easier for his son. In doing so he drug the president down. If you can’t stand it for your family then get the hell out of public life. I didn’t notice DJT backing down because of the affect it was having on his family.
If that’s their excuse then they don’t belong there in the first place. A SC justice has to have courage and impartiality when reviewing cases or so I always thought. They must respect the Constitution and look always to defending it. imo. To have no courage as a SC justice is to do a great disservice to the position and to the USA.
Well at least Kavanaugh the cry baby doesn’t have to worry about Anifa and BLM protesting outside of his home upsetting his wife and children. He voted the way they wanted him to.
The problem with bowing to the bully is the bully is never satisfied. In 3 months, this deed will be forgotten, and the Left will want more favors in exchange for his safety.
With these words, even Justice Thomas has accepted the steal and NOT recognized illegal activities DID change the outcome.
“We are fortunate that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s decision to change the receipt deadline for mail-in ballotsdoes not appear to have changed the outcome in any federal election…”
ALL 9 Justices are now in on the steal.
Read his words closely. The only question Thomas says was unanswered involves who has authority to set rules but NOT the outcome of the election.
Plus, even Thomas failed in not citing actual acts of Congress that have gone unmodified for over 100 years that set dates and requirements as is within the constitutional authority of Congress and that states must comprehend when setting their Federal voting rules and methods.
That being said, there would and will be ZERO relief on the actual outcome of the 2020 election. The only best possible outcome, even for Powell and Lin cases, is the actual definition of which governing authorities at STATE level hold sway over the elections. The election outcome WILL NOT be changed.
Sock Puppet Joe and ALL the demo-commie damage to come is here to stay.
ALL 9 Judges will refuse to hear any cases involving fraud that will challenge the outcome of the 2020 Election. All Thomas, Gorsuch and Alito will consider are cases involving setting lines of authority for future elections.
In the 10 ring, doc. In the 10 ring.
I wish I had missed the target all together.
Thomas: “We are fortunate that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s decision to change the receipt deadline for mail-in ballotsdoes not appear to have changed the outcome in any federal election…”
Letter to Thomas, after quoting above in letter: “It’s been precedent for nearly 250 years in America to pronounce the verdict after hearing and examining all the evidence. How then do you, one jurist of nine, now contravene those 250 years of precedence? Have you evidence to support your contravention? If so, which piece or pieces of evidence “does not appear to have changed the outcome”?”
Republic is lost.
There is no coming back when the highest court in the land is fully corrupt.
The Senate, fully corrupt, save MAYBE a hand full.
House mostly corrupt.
Executive fully corrupted by the deep state, occupant matters not.
All the D controlled states and some R.
Same for cities.
Elections no longer matter, the state determines the winner and the outcome, and no, you can’t watch or challenge any aspect.
If there are no repercussions for election fraud, and hint, there aren’t!
Then what is to stop them from stealing it again?
Fix what they broke this time? They will break it somewhere else, and get away with it…while we complain AS they do it…but will be once again powerless to stop it.
Correct. Elections don’t matter anymore. Anytime they need a seat, they count the votes in swing districts until the Conservative votes are counted. They stop counting, go manufacture enough votes to defeat the Conservative, they count these votes and declare the Dem the winner. There is no one to call BS. They all walk. Conservative goes home, Dem heads for Washington.
In judging Thomas, You need to keep in mind Trump said almost the same thing in one of his appeals.
A massive disappointment but no real surprise -simply confirmation that the federal govt is totally corrupt and beyond redemption. Be of good cheer, the states are our battleground and PDJT has already stated his intention to work the grassroots and take the feds out at the knees. Welcome to Irish Democracy.
i am sick that i defended kavanaugh.
makes me think he actually did everything they said he did.
his betrayal really is a gutt-punch.
SCOTUS is no longer ruling in accordance with the US Constitution. It is bending to whatever supports the progressive movement. The Roberts court has three conservatives, three liberals and three cowards.
After issuing some pretty ridiculous rulings, “conservative” is not a term I would use to describe Gorsuch.
Instead, I would describe Gorsuch as an extremist who can flip fop hard in either direction such as his ruling where he gave half of the State of Oklahoma away to Native Americans.
Gorsuch didn’t quite give have the state to the Indians but he did hose up the legal system beyond repair with his idiotic ruling. Once again, love Trump, but so many of his appointees and nominees were just total POSs.
Let’s face it, too many of the powerful don’t like Trump and want to stop him. I think it’s unfortunate, but I get the impression that some have it in their mind that they need to stop him.
unfortunate…really??? A near complete deriliction of responsibility unfortunate??? Huh…. who did what to whom behind whose barn?. Ho Hum much? I say near complete only because thay had the curtesy to give us a reach-around by publishing their dastardly deed.
And they’ll break any rule, law or moral / ethical clause to make it so. 75m be damned.
Profiles in cowardice for the six justices whose oath to uphold the Constitution is a shibboleth.
Is there any US Institution that isn’t thoroughly corrupt?
When you look back at what happened during the election..and afterwards, every aspect of government failed. Local, state, federal….executive branches, legislative, and courts. From the bottom to the top. Staggers the imagination.
Is that a rhetorical question? The answer is no…..
The Supreme Court is shameless thanks to CJ Roberts.
Kavanaugh always had red flags for me. Being an elitist from the DC swamp and attending the same schools as the other corrupt people was one of them. Another was his crying which showed incredible weakness when we need strength.
Perhaps Kavanaugh, Coney and other SC “justices” snort coke and smoke pot like Obama and his ilk. As good a reason as any for their stupidity.
Os, is anybody interested in looking into “Quo Warranto” now?
And possibly getting the word to Trump?
It’s not too late.
Do you think PTrump has not been advised of quo warranto? Why wouldn’t he have been told by Rudy about it since we know Rudy was advised of it by numerous people. For some reason, it was never mentioned nor planned to be used. Why? I’d love to know that answer.
This looks like institutional conservatism (Federalist society, Heritage Foundation et al) marshaling their forces against Trump and the MAGA movement to me. They facilitated the NYAG to get his taxes and refused to intervene, and they refused to act on election law violations to ensure that future elections can overcome MAGA turnout as well, even if democrats win.
Remember Mitch’s Senate floor speech outlining how Trump was still on the hook for other things even though impeachment was not constitutional? I think that’s what we’re seeing here. SCOTUS is facilitating the NYAG to rummage through his tax history to take him down personally, and signaling the states to do what they have to do to ensure MAGA doesn’t win elections again. I said they’d be willing to destroy the entire Republican party to destroy the MAGA base, and it looks like that’s what they’re going to do.
While it is never a good idea to look into the background of the court for motives, one cannot easily dismiss that Roberts, Kavanaugh and Barrett may have voted against the writ because they were concerned such a decision would cause the senate to start a process of “packing the court.” Retaining the current number of justices within the court is more likely if the justices avoid triggering the consequences from the previous threat.
Perhaps Sundance perhaps you shoud have finished your thought process with this,
Clara
February 22, 2021 4:27 pm
The argument that Amy and Brett went along with Roberts on this because they were afraid that if they didn’t, the Dems would retaliate by packing the court makes Amy and Brett sound more human than may deserve. After all, if they had taken ANY of the election fraud cases, they might have forced a true recount in the swing states, and Trump might still be president. Then they wouldn’t have had to worry about court-packing at all. So, if this is their excuse, I would say that, at the very least, they brought it on themselves. They also are revealing themselves to be completely self-centered, more concerned about how much individual power and influence they may or may not have in the future vs. how much collective power and influence We the People have with our votes.
Lady Justice weeps, for her blindfold has been ripped off and her scales have become unbalanced.
Dismissed as moot.
My very words.
But it isn’t moot, is it.
Wow, censors here too.
You used a new email (on this site.) First comments are moderated, as you should know, and 2 minutes in between comments should not put a knot in your thong.
Obama threatened the Supreme Court before its ruling on Obamacare. Schumer threatened the justices about rulings on abortion. Democrats threatened them about packing the court.
Isn’t it illegal to threaten the Supreme Court?
What if 500,000 Maga folks rallied outside the razor wire fences in D.C. and exercised our constitutional rights?
Yeah! This is something that should get the base going! Protest? Yes very much so, otherwise we are going to continue to see this duplicitous treason at all levels. How can voter fraud be addressed if it cannot have its day in court?
So the premise, is that under Joseph Stolen , one or more of the judges are voting against what they think is right. They are doing this so they can live to fight another day.
While this is entirely possible in the obamanation, one has to wonder more of the judges did not do something about it in December when the odds were less formidable.
Trump 2024, DeSantis 2024, 3rd Party, reform the GOP….. It’s all bullshit because we passed the point of no return a while ago.
If you want your country back you’ll have to do it yourself. God is not going to save the satanist controlled hellhole called America, her people are not worthy. Yet I see so many conservatives espouse some nonsense about God blessing and or saving America. Backed up by out of context bible quotes. Please stop.
Trump 2024. DeSantis is an awesome governor but he doesn’t have to take the crap that Trump did on the national level. Once you’re up against the deep state,media,Dems, never Trumpers,McConnell and people like him (and there’s plenty) it’s a whole different playing field. A Trump-DeSantis ticket would be excellent. Get Ron’s toe in the water first. He’s going to have to see it first hand and learn what he’s up against.
I need some hope, y’all.
With Malice Towards All And Charity Towards None: R.I.P. The Rule of Law
So That Government Of the Government, By the Government and For the Government Shall Not Perish From the Swamp
“We’re at an inflection point between those who argue that…autocracy is the best way forward…and those who understand that democracy is essential.”–Usurper Biden, the criminal who just stole Americans’ Sacred Right to govern themselves.
Every institution we built to defend our liberties has been turned around and pointed back at us now, weaponized against us to destroy those liberties. This Supreme Court ruling today is good in one regard only; it clarifies that there is nothing left of the old worth saving.
It has been said the Court ruled for the Deep State Slave Power in order to stave off court-packing. But what is the point if the Court rules like a packed court would rule anyway?
The Court could have easily ruled that Court-packing was un-Constitutional despite any precedent to the contrary. They make stuff up anyway. But the fact is Justice Roberts and his liberal majority have been in on the Coup from the beginning. The entire Gangster Government has committed an Insurrection against the People.
They control all three branches now, many state governments, and especially the DOJ and the FBI. Now that they have learned that they can steal elections in broad daylight, why would they ever willingly relinquish that power?
They won’t, not willingly. We’re going to have to take it back.
In literary terms, this is the part in the sci-fi novel where the robot says “Screw it!” and takes over from the humans. That is what our Cyborg Swamp Creature has done.
In historical terms, this is Dred Scott. The Court has just ruled for the Slave Power once again, and the results will likely be similar. The runaway Dred Trump administration must be returned to its rightful owner, the Swamp. The Trump voter has no rights the Swamp Man must respect.
It’s just a matter of time now.
Sumter Awaits.
The Democrat, media, and the law have their new jim crow.
Thank you Clarence Thomas. What is with Kavenaugh and Barrett?
https://trendingpolitics.com/clarence-thomas-unleashes-brutal-smackdown-against-the-supreme-court-over-election-ruling/
And to think that a couple of months ago, there were a ton of online Amy Barrett propagandists!
Are identity politics infecting some conservatives to the point that they are willing to choose a Supreme Court justice based on their sex, even if the Supreme Court justice eventually ends up revealing himself to be a David Souter or herself to be a clone of Ruth Ginsburg?
Let’s face it, if Amy Barrett were a man, she would have never managed to get so many people to shill for her online.
In fact, if Amy Barrett were a man, there would have been more people saying that she would just turn out to be another David Souter or John Roberts and those people would been proven right!
Don’t get me wrong, I am not letting Kavanaugh get off, either.
For example, it is disturbing how ideologically aligned Kavanaugh is to Merrick Garland now that Merrick Garland has thrown off his mask during his Senate Confirmation Hearing for Attorney General.
Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh voted with Judge Merrick Garland, his former colleague on the U.S. District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals, 93% of time.
This means that 93% of the time, Kavanaugh agreed with a disturbing individual like Garland in the DC Circuit Court!
Imagine agreeing with a snake like Garland 93% of the time as part of your job.
SEN. SUSAN COLLINS, (R), MAINE: Woman’s right to choose says that Judge Kavanaugh fits within the main stream of legal thought. She also observed that Judge Kavanaugh is remarkably committed to promoting women in the legal profession. That Judge Kavanaugh is more of a centrist than some of his critics maintain is reflected in the fact that he and Chief Judge Merrick Garland voted the same way in 93 percent of the cases that they heard together. Indeed, Chief Judge Garland joined in more than 96 percent of the majority opinions authored by Judge Kavanaugh, dissenting only once.
Source: https://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1810/05/cnr.08.html
Well said. The weird obsession over “Amy” as so many on the right called her, was foolish. She cried over George Floyd.
wow- Thomas pays it on the line very succinctly. Time will tell how important his dissent is.
Are y’all ready? We dont have a country anymore..not for a long time now.Its different today- it’s in your face out in the open day.So let’s Shitcan this mess and start a new country- secession is the only option left. Trump cant fix this,no one can it’s too far gone. Let’s start over.
Frankly I am close to giving up on this nation. When you have elections compromised, judges, governors and members of the SCOTUS, either through outright bribery or intimidation, we have fallen. Sorry for the downer, but it’s just one event among many more coming and to come that will push our freedom and Constitution deeper into the abyss.
In the meantime I can count on 2 fingers the amount of pushback action that has been generated to date against this landslide of Marxism. Both instances are so minor and limited they hardly registered a ripple. The Uniparty are a party to this, and the small cadre of MAGA members are (to date) unorganized or still scrambling to defend against constant assault from the left and their own.
I gave up when I saw a bunch of hopeless dumbasses waving flags after 911while they passed the Patriot Act. Everyday since then as I interact with Americans I know we are totally screwed. 25 years of trying educate TV watchers has proven to be fruitless.
Now I watch conservatives post bible quotes seemingly unaware America is not a special place. But rather a place where innocents suffer while her people do nothing. The place where millions are aborted and abducted is not a divine place in the eyes of the lord.
Agree. We are openly being ruled by an illegally installed criminal gang. That SCOTUS is willing to proclaim this is OK to the world tells me that apparently all of them, but Thomas and Alito, are very probably criminally compromised per Club membership rules. This is satanic stuff. So much for Kavenaugh and Coney’s so-called religious faith and churchgoing. They are clear apostates, voting for this satanic illegal regime.