According to the latest developments in the IRS whistleblower reporting, the “senior U.S. justice department official” who is interfering and lying under oath to congress is U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland.
WASHINGTON — Attorney General Merrick Garland is the unnamed official whose sworn testimony before Congress is being challenged in a bombshell letter from an IRS whistleblower’s attorney that also alleges a coverup in the Hunter Biden criminal investigation, The Post has learned. (more)
The issue stems from Garland testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee that Delaware US Attorney David Weiss would be able to investigate the Hunter Biden issues without interference from the DOJ, and that Weiss would be able to prosecute any crimes that may have occurred outside his Delaware jurisdiction. As the story is evolving, Main Justice is not following the process as outlined by Garland, and the DOJ is actively involved in approvals or non-approvals of the investigative process.
The whistleblower’s attorney, Mark Lytle, appeared on Fox News with Brett Baier to outline the issues at stake in the matter and why congressional approval is needed before the IRS whistleblower can give specific evidence and testimony to the committees with jurisdiction. WATCH:
.
Knowing what we know about how Main Justice is being operated in the era of Joe Biden, I would not be surprised to discover that Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco is actually the main character in this DOJ manipulation. AG Garland may be the front man giving what amounts to false testimony, but it is likely Lisa Monaco pulling the strings behind Garland that are making his congressional statements false.
Congress will not allow the exposure of how money is laundered in DC.
Is this all a show so the DNC can dispose of FJB before the next election cycle? But who do they move on to? The idiots Clyburn and Bragg?
The Durham report is almost complete.
Just 8 more years to go.
Can’t wait to hear?
Trump is under 2 Special Counsel investigations at this time. The first Special Counsel was Mueller/ Wiesmann, and that started in early 2017– just a few months after he got in office. Now with the Durham and Jack Smith investigations going on, it means Trump has been under investigation for 6 years! Let that sink in! No end in sight. And the purpose is to stop Trump from releasing any details of spying, documents of corruption (think Ukraine) and others. We are in a fight of good vs. evil, and if we can’t get Trump into office, I fear evil will have won.
Time seems to be on the side of evil.
Terrible times we are living in.
Trumps victory is the only way to sanity if there is any left to be had.
These ongoing, phony investigations laid traps for our President, both while he held the highest office in the land, and now as a private citizen. Even the charges themselves are kept under wraps “due to the sensitivity of the matter.”
Completely ridiculous, but made to seem plausible by a treasonous DC swamp and a complicit ENEmedia who constantly lie to the American public.
In this way, the alphabet agencies need only lie in wait to slap real charges on him as soon as he responds to the frivolous ones. Any defense he mounts will either be labeled obstruction or retaliation.
Our justice system and our true President have long been hogtied by a group of insulated and highly politicized law-fare zealots.
😂, right !
“Just 8 more years to go.”
So true. Don’t know whether to laugh or cry
None of this means anything, if they are allowed to keep getting away with it. Wake me up when some of these people are arrested and charged with their crimes.
Yeah, just like in families (Biden) and the hoods, if there’s no consequences for bad behavior, IT JUST KEEPS HAPPENING!!!
And, it would be best, imho, if said negative consequences were VERY PUBLIC!!!
So we know for a FACT merrick garland has lied under oath and anthony fauci has lied under oath. W H E R E Are the indictments and why aren’t they in jail. I don’t care about he said/she said, JUST the facts!!!
I think this is actually a pertinent question. Congress can investigate, have committees and that sort of thing. But it cannot indict anyone; it can only refer someone to the Department of Justice for indictment. So if they refer Garland…? Catch 22?
Congress can find a person in contempt and imprison them. It’s well past time for that. GOP needs to go big or go home. Play time is over.
As I understand it Clowngress can set up a special prosecutor. It’s long past time. If Garland/Biden can have Jack Smith then the House can set up a competing prosecutor.
Fair is fair.
so far, the only result of the last few special counsels/prosecutors was the put all the important evidence under a gag of secrecy. In other words the reason to appoint them in the first place is to keep all the facts from the public.
LOl, the hens have to refer the matter to the fox.
Which is exactly why a weaponized Dept. of inJustice is such a problem for our nation.
When they can judge and jurisdiction shop to indict a ham sandwich ie every conservative or American patriot, and overt criminal activity at the highest level is ignored, there is no rule of law.
In the Empire of Lies the facts are always hidden.
and nothing….(I’ll repeat again)….
and nothing will happen.
”It’s a big club, and you ain’t in it….”
— George Carlin
The only club you know about ,is the one they’re beating you over the head with !
Listening to the clip is almost unbearable from the first question: “Why is your client not coming forward publicly?” and it takes his lawyer a couple minutes to get to the answer in a roundabout way. “He knows he’s going to be attacked” (by the full force of the corrupt government.
Unbearable comments/questions? Consider the source: Bret Baier, our to destroy conservatives for a long time, and still.
Fox news certainly WAS NOT saying that about Eric Ciaramella (“whistleblower” in Trump’s 1st impeachment trial), now that it is against Biden, whistleblower must come forward. If it wasn’t for double standards, Fox would have NO standards at all.
#impeach Garland 2023
At first I thought the DC swamp could be drained, cleansed and restored to function as the government of the American people.
I have now concluded there is no hope for DC or for it’s inhabitants; they have become so thoroughly corrupted by warped ideology and politicization, it cannot be cleansed. I believe it must be destroyed completely and a “no go” zone erected to warn humans of the corruption and stinking, lying, abhorrent cancer that it was must never be allowed to rise again.
As evidenced by Brett Baier, someone I once listened to and respected, the lies, smears and obfuscation has already begun in an attempt to ruin an honorable persons life.
These people are disgusting.
Even if The Swamp is drained ie people get fired (and become CNN pundits with book deals), the culture will not change until more than a handful of high profile Swamp Dwellers GO TO PRISON.
I have a much more fitting and permanent solution than going to prison……….
that is what china does and perhaps that would be a beneficial import. Even their CEO’s can receive capital punishment for crimes of corruption.
I have always believed that politicians, judicial officers and other govt employees should receive mandatory maximum sentences when they are convicted of a crime as a related to their employment as their crimes affect the magnitude of the general public.
“I have now concluded there is no hope for DC or for it’s inhabitants; they have become so thoroughly corrupted by warped ideology and politicization, it cannot be cleansed. ”
I think they have become corrupted by blackmail, extortion and bribery, I think ideology and politics is something shiny we are given to watch that has no real relevance to their corruption.
The enemy can do whatever they want and never get punished for it.
God help us.
So, there are some federal agents willing to put everything on the line to do the right thing.
Sundance, the attorney for whistle blower was involved in Russia hoax. My understanding is he travelled to Ukraine with some of the hoax’s familiar names.
The swamp is deep. Wondering whether this whistleblower thing is a setup. Perhaps to use IRS to sidetrack a criminal investigation. I really don’t want to see Biden crime family face IRS tax evasion fines. I want to see them face fraud, sale of classified documents, racketeering, money laundering, etc. charges.
“Missing Oaths of Office will render a majority of the Biden Administration Cabinet unlawful and their official acts from the date of appointment void. Failure to produce the affidavit(s) to the US Attorney will provide the necessary jurisdiction to the Federal District Court of Washington D.C. to issue said Writ Quo Warranto.” – Section of letter by below attorneys, as reported by The Standard News Wire, via Dianne Marshall Report. Continuing…
On April 12, 2023, Todd S. Callender, Esq. of Disabled Rights Advocates PLLC, and Kenneth W. Ferguson, Esq. of Ferguson Law, P.A., filed on Petition for Writ of Quo Warranto, on behalf of Petitioner, Lisa McGee, to the US Attorney in the District of Columbia, requesting: 1) true, correct and non-defective required affidavits of Oaths of Office for the appointed and elected cabinet members of the Biden Administration; 2) or the immediate removal of all named parties for failure to abide their this statutory requirement; and 3) if removed, then to void all their official acts ab initio (from the beginning).
Merrick Garland: An affidavit was produced; however, Garland fails to specify the date when he was appointed; and is not properly notarized or sworn.
I strongly recommend totally dropping the word “honorable” when addressing members of congress. IMO, one might be able to count those who are honorable on one hand. Most of congress, and their staffs, are totally corrupt, and very far away from being described with “honorable”. I would love to see “The Totally Corrupt [name and party]…………..
Wow. Suddenly, NBC News begins reporting the DOJ is considering 4 charges against Hunter.
Probably just coincidence!
The Group, and or individual- Marco Polo, did and exhaustive investigation of the lap top from hell and cited over 1,000 proof of crimes existed within, that could/should be prosecuted.
Would’ve
Could’ve
Should’ve
If…
or minor charges meant to distract from the major crimes
Everyone has their own agenda.
Hopefully, someone with some authority to actually act, charge and prosecute some of these scumbags will actually do it at some point.
In the mean time, Fox gets thrilled with
“Breaking News” (revenue)
Lawyers lawyer (and bill for it)
Congressional committees create newsworthy sound bites (and fund raise)
How much $#!+ can flow in the $#!+ show that is DC Politics?
The world is watching and waiting to see.
God have mercy (on the next generation)
We’ve had too much at his point.
Too much mercy leads to spoiled irreverent self-indulgent reprobates.
decided to look at the law wrt to why this whistleblower would first need congressional approval before discussing and making testimony about corruption or any misconduct. (I am not an attorney…just curious…I tend to give my own opinions, but in this case I am way out of my element, so I am just posting the applicable law language for review by others)
so we begin,
in the letter the whistleblower refers two specific US Code (law) that stands in his way to provide testimony before congress:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/6103
USC 25 Section 6103 f(5)
(5)Reporting requirements
Within 30 days after the close of each calendar quarter, the President and the head of any agency requesting returns and return information under this subsection shall each file a report with the Joint Committee on Taxation setting forth the taxpayers with respect to whom such requests were made during such quarter under this subsection, the returns or return information involved, and the reasons for such requests. The President shall not be required to report on any request for returns and return information pertaining to an individual who was an officer or employee of the executive branch of the Federal Government at the time such request was made. Reports filed pursuant to this paragraph shall not be disclosed unless the Joint Committee on Taxation determines that disclosure thereof (including identifying details) would be in the national interest. Such reports shall be maintained by the Joint Committee on Taxation for a period not exceeding 2 years unless, within such period, the Joint Committee on Taxation determines that a disclosure to the Congress is necessary.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/2302
5 usc 2302 b(8)(c)
(C)any disclosure to Congress (including any committee of Congress) by any employee of an agency or applicant for employment at an agency of information described in subparagraph (B) that is—
(i)not classified; or
(ii)if classified—
(I)has been classified by the head of an agency that is not an element of the intelligence community (as defined by section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003)); and
(II)does not reveal intelligence sources and methods.[1]
notes: the first US law reference pertains to prohibits on reporting outside of presidential (the executive branch) requirements. given congress is not executive, this may be a problem of administrative law to clear the way for out of schedule reporting. It may becomes a reality that the whistleblower have his reporting go through the whitehouse FIRST for approval. So this may end up being a dog fight. The second US law reference pertains to prohibits on reporting matters involving classified materials. If there IS an ongoing investigation and the materials are classified, this also might limit what the whistleblower may or may not be allowed to discuss. And if there is a contest over the issue of classification, it most certainly will be brokered by DOJ…with the special counsel dummy bot ruling in favor of concealing it in a black hole rendering the testimony weak team. that’s predicatable.
God Bless America
Well golly gee, good thing those pesky Democrats established a precedent with Trump’s tax returns. The Trumporang comes back around…
And it better bite them in the arse.
Thanks for sharing the US Code.
…imho, the attorney (under duress of wanting to be liked, and media pressure)
exposed too much info about the whistleblower.
[ given the spy tools available, and process of elimination / filtering,
that is potentially not good for the whistle process, truth, or whistle health / well being
(but good for those that need fibs to be miss believed by hiding truths).
loose lips, sink ships. ]
[ the lefty bonu$ ( 30 coin$ ? ) to b b, is to remain confidential…
unlike the whistler’s confidentiality…
…2 tiered miss just-us … ]
imho
Called this earlier – DOJ looking at Misdemeanor charges for Hunter. Tax evasion, etc. This entire Whistleblower thing was to enable Misdemeanors… ARGH !
Bret Baire: “We brought you on here to violate your oath, the confidentiality of your client; so, please, give us his name because we got to getting to discrediting him. Don’t you know who we are?”
Also, why is this attorney even sitting for an interview? Must have matches in his pocket.
It appears to me that the only one who called H Biden by name was his own attorney; intimating that he believes the person targeted was H Biden. The whistleblower attorney never said anything that revealed information related to H Biden.
Commie DOJ, out loud & proud now…
{ https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/04/it-begins-doj-arrests-4-black-leftists-for-spreading-pro-russia-propaganda-in-memes-articles-and-speeches/ }