The Scale and Scope of the DOJ Control Agents – DOJ FISA Official Quietly Removed After IG Draft Report Sent to Bill Barr…

Rumor in the DC grapevine is that a few weeks ago Tashina Gauhar was quietly removed from her position as lawyer for the DOJ National Security Division (in charge of FISA applications).  This removal happened immediately after IG Michael Horowitz submitted his first draft report to Attorney General Bill Barr for classification review.   Ms. Gauhar now reportedly works for Boeing.

If confirmed, Gauhar’s exit in advance of the IG report could indicate helpful participation, or DOJ Main Justice may be providing cover to protect Tash Gauhar as they did with SSCI Security Director James Wolfe.  Keep eyes on a swivel, here’s why:

♦ On March 2nd, 2017, Tashina “Tash” Gauhar was one of a small group of DOJ officials who participated in a conversation that led to the recusal of Jeff Sessions from anything related to the 2016 election.  This recusal included the ongoing FBI counterintelligence investigation known as Crossfire Hurricane, later picked up (May 17th) by Robert Mueller.

Immediately following this meeting, AG Jeff Sessions announced his recusal.

The attendees for the recusal decision-making meeting (see above schedule) included Sessions’ chief of staff Jody Hunt; Criminal Chief in the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Maryland, Jim Crowell; Acting Deputy AG, ¹Dana Boente; Deputy Assistant Attorney General (DAAG) in the Department of Justice National Security Division Tash Gauhar (FISA lawyer); and Associate Deputy Attorney General Scott Schools.

[Note: Tash Gauhar was lawyer for FBI Clinton case; and Scott Schools was part of drafting Clinton exoneration letter.]

This was the Main Justice group who influenced Jeff Sessions to recuse.

Now, fast-forward to May, 2017:

Tuesday May 16th, 2017 –  In Main Justice at 12:30pm Rod Rosenstein, Andrew McCabe, Jim Crowell and Tashina Gauhar are again part of another meeting.   I should note that alternate documentary evidence, gathered over the past two years, supports the content of this McCabe memo.  Including texts between Lisa Page and Peter Strzok:

[Sidebar: pay attention to the redactions; they appear to be placed by existing DOJ officials in an effort to protect Rod Rosenstein for his duplicity in: (A) running the Mueller sting operation at the white house on the same day; (B) the appointment of Robert Mueller as special counsel, which was pre-determined before the Oval Office meeting.]

While McCabe was writing this afternoon memo, still May 16th, Rod Rosenstein took Robert Mueller to the White House for a meeting in the oval office with President Trump and VP Mike Pence.

After six days of phone calls, emails and in person meetings, this visit to the White House was clearly Rod Rosenstein introducing Robert Mueller to the target of the investigation.  Rosenstein already knew he was going to appoint Mueller; and Mueller, along with the small group in the DOJ and FBI, already knew Mueller was going to be appointed.

Later that night (May 16th), following the Rosenstein-Mueller WH sting operation, there was a debriefing session back at Main Justice.  This evening meeting appears to be Lisa Page, Rod Rosenstein and Andrew McCabe; along with Tashina Gauhar taking notes.

[Mueller Report]

Considering the 2016 operation against candidate and president-elect Trump, as the Deputy Assistant Attorney General (DAAG) in the Department of Justice National Security Division, FISA lawyer Tash Gauhar would have a specific, material and self-interested alignment with the ongoing DOJ/FBI effort to remove President Trump.

Either Tashina Gauhar has cooperated with the Horowitz, Durham and Barr probes and left the DOJ prior to the IG report on FISA abuse (and her role therein) being made public, as part of an internal dynamic; -OR- the IG discoveries about direct and affiliated activity that surrounded Ms. Gauhar led to her pre-report exit as a Main Justice coverup.

Hope for the former; but keep an eye open for the latter.

With hindsight it is now clear the various players inside Main Justice and the FBI had a vested interest in maintaining the assault against Trump. In late 2019 everyone can see the bigger goal was against the office of POTUS. [“obstruction” etc.] All of the personnel moves should be reviewed with hindsight of the larger anti-Trump objective in mind.

Important Point – Against the known fraud that was the Trump-Russia Collusion-Conspiracy narrative, there are no visible 2016 and 2017 top-level DOJ/FBI people who didn’t participate in one form or another.

¹When Jeff Sessions became AG, Dana Boente became Acting Deputy AG, a role he would retain until Rod Rosenstein was confirmed on April 25th, 2017. [Mary McCord remained head of the DOJ-National Security Division] In 2019 Dana Boente is currently FBI chief legal counsel.

Tashina Gauhar, Jim Crowell and Dana Boente all advised Jeff Sessions to recuse himself.

With AG Jeff Sessions recused on March 2, 2017, FBI Director James Comey reported to Acting Deputy AG Dana Boente.  [Technically, Boente was still EDVA U.S. Attorney and was only ‘acting’ as Deputy AG]  Additionally, on March 31st, 2017, President Trump signs executive order 13787 making the U.S. EDVA Attorney the 3rd in line for DOJ succession.

In the period between March 2nd and April 25th – With AG Sessions recused, and without a Deputy AG confirmed, Dana Boente is simultaneously:

  • U.S. Attorney for EDVA
  • Acting Deputy AG.
  • Acting AG for all issues related to Sessions recusal.

James Comey & Dana Boente sign the April 2017 FISA renewal against Carter Page.

(Page #271 – Carter Page FISA Application)

This dynamic would later become important as notes Boente took from conversations with James Comey became evidence for Mueller’s expanded obstruction investigation.  [3/2/17 Mary McCord is still head of DOJ-NSD]

Dana Boente was head of DOJ-NSD from May 11th, 2017 through end of October 2017 when he officially announced his intent to retire.  However, the timeline gets cloudy here because Boente said he was staying on until an official replacement was announced. There’s no indication of when he actually left the DOJ-NSD or the EDVA role.

On January 23rd, 2018, FBI Director Christopher Wray announced Boente has shifted over to the FBI to be Chief Legal Counsel (replacing James Baker).  This decision is made while Weissmann and Mueller are using 19 lawyers, and 40 FBI investigators to continue their investigation of President Trump.

As FBI legal counsel Dana Boente now becomes a legal adviser to Christopher Wray while the Mueller probe is ongoing.  From the Mueller Report:

As we discovered earlier this year, Mueller’s lead FBI agent for the corrupt Russia collusion-conspiracy investigation, was David W. Archey.  Archey was selected by Robert Mueller when FBI Agent Peter Strzok was removed.  The Mueller probe took over the counterintelligence investigation May 17, 2017, a few months later Special Agent Peter Strzok was removed (July) and David W. Archey was brought in:

As David Archey arrives in August 2017, Mueller is getting the new scope memo from Rod Rosenstein.  The August scope memo authorizes the Mueller team to investigate the Steele Dossier.  There’s little doubt the entire FBI group would have known the Trump-Russia collusion-conspiracy narrative was false.  So David Archey status as lead agent has to be considered *corrupt/sketchy*; FBI activity was likely focused on the obstruction angle.

Interestingly at the conclusion of the Mueller investigation Archey was promoted by Christopher Wray to head of the Richmond, Virginia FBI field office on March 4, 2019.  This FBI field office overlaps with another FBI/DOJ filing from the EDVA.

A little more than a month after Archey takes over the Virginia FBI field office, on April 11th, 2019, the Julian Assange indictment  was unsealed in the EDVA.  From the indictment we discover it was under seal since March 6th, 2018:

(Link to pdf)

On Tuesday April 15th more investigative material was released. Again, note the dates: Grand Jury, *December of 2017* This means FBI investigation prior to….

The FBI investigation took place prior to December 2017, it was coordinated through the EDVA where Dana Boente was still, presumably, U.S. Attorney.  The grand jury indictment was sealed from March of 2018 until after Mueller completed his investigation, April 2019.

Why the delay?  Here’s where it gets interesting….

This FBI submission to the Grand Jury in December of 2017 was four months after congressman Dana Rohrabacher talked to Julian Assange in August of 2017: “Assange told a U.S. congressman … he can prove the leaked Democratic Party documents … did not come from Russia.”

(August 2017, The Hill Via John Solomon) Julian Assange told a U.S. congressman on Tuesday he can prove the leaked Democratic Party documents he published during last year’s election did not come from Russia and promised additional helpful information about the leaks in the near future.

Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, a California Republican who is friendly to Russia and chairs an important House subcommittee on Eurasia policy, became the first American congressman to meet with Assange during a three-hour private gathering at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, where the WikiLeaks founder has been holed up for years.

Rohrabacher recounted his conversation with Assange to The Hill.

“Our three-hour meeting covered a wide array of issues, including the WikiLeaks exposure of the DNC [Democratic National Committee] emails during last year’s presidential election,” Rohrabacher said, “Julian emphatically stated that the Russians were not involved in the hacking or disclosure of those emails.”

Pressed for more detail on the source of the documents, Rohrabacher said he had information to share privately with President Trump. (read more)

It would appear the FBI took keen interest after this August 2017 meeting and gathered specific evidence for a grand jury by December 2017.  Then the DOJ sat on the indictment (sealed in March 2018) while the Mueller probe was ongoing; until April 11th, 2019, when a planned and coordinated effort between the U.K. and U.S. was launched. Assange was arrested, and the EDVA indictment was unsealed (link).

To me, as a person who has researched this three year fiasco; including the ridiculously false 2016 Russian hacking/interference narrative: “17 intelligence agencies”, JAR report (needed for Obama in December ’16), and political ICA (January ’17); this looked like a Deep State move to control Julian Assange because the Mueller report was dependent on Russia cybercrimes…. AND that entire narrative is contingent on the Russia DNC hack story which Julian Assange disputes.

The Weissmann/Mueller report contains claims that Russia hacked the DNC servers as the central element to the Russia interference narrative in the U.S. election. This claim is directly disputed by WikiLeaks and Julian Assange, as outlined during the Dana Rohrabacher interview.

There is the corrupt DOJ/FBI motive to shut Assange down.

There are no “good guys” in this. There are no “white hats” here. Certainly not Mueller, Rosenstein, Wray, Bowditch, Boente or Tashina Gauhar. Instead, this is a matrix of broad interests positioned only to benefit and sustain the status quo of the administrative state; and protect the larger DC community from the Trump disruption.

 

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Big Government, Big Stupid Government, CIA, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Donald Trump, Donald Trump Transition, Election 2016, Election 2020, FBI, IG Report Comey, IG Report FISA Abuse, IG Report McCabe, Legislation, media bias, Notorious Liars, President Trump, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Russia, Spygate, Spying, THE BIG UGLY, Typical Prog Behavior, Uncategorized, White House Coverup. Bookmark the permalink.

486 Responses to The Scale and Scope of the DOJ Control Agents – DOJ FISA Official Quietly Removed After IG Draft Report Sent to Bill Barr…

  1. hokkoda says:

    Sounds like FBI and DOJ are going to go with the “none of these people work here any more, case closed” defense.

    I feel like a media campaign to call attention to corrupt Boeing hiring a corrupt DOJ lawyer is in order…would be good if Guahar’s career as a highly-compensated-employee at Boeing came to a short, ignominious, end…

    Liked by 5 people

  2. thedoc00 says:

    The underpinning to the (now acknowledged) “deep state” is the 1,000’s of “professional” Federal Employees who are the action officers for all decisions. Approximately 2/3 to 3/4 of them were hired during the Clinton and Obama administrations and they cannot be removed nor just reassigned if the Federal Government has even a hope of functioning. They can be commanded to go rogue by the Democrat Party puppet masters as needed and be assured of work outside the government after they are fired or resign. Plus, they know the limits to which they can act to stay out of legal peril.

    The remedies are painful and/or long term:
    – remove them as they are exposed and examine closely if they can be legally damaged.
    – 4 more years of hiring under a re-elected President Trump.
    – 8 more years of another President Trump clone (replaces about 50% of the Clinton-Obama hires).
    – Win back the legislature in 2020 with real Republicans (a long shot), to improve quality of appointees and depth of Executive Branch control by the President.
    – Begin closing down “redundant” Federal agencies and furlough the Obama-Clinton hires.

    Liked by 4 people

  3. Sherri Young says:

    This is going to be long, but please hang with me.

    I commented earlier this morning about an allusion to a WaPo opinion piece in the Carter Page FISA. The piece is available on the Wayback Machine if you don’t have a subscription to the Bezos yellow journalism bird cage liner. On first pass, I missed the importance and need to pull in more info.

    This article sets the table for the Trump/Russia collusion story.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/global-opinions/trump-campaign-guts-gops-anti-russia-stance-on-ukraine/2016/07/18/98adb3b0-4cf3-11e6-a7d8-13d06b37f256_story.html

    In that opinion piece, Josh Rogin writes about Diana Denman, a Ted Cruz Texas delegate to the 2016 RNC convention in Cleveland. She advocated for a change in the GOP’s platform that hardened the platform position on Russia/Ukraine to one of heavier sanctions against Russia and for providing lethal aid (weapons) to Ukraine. JD Gordon of the Trump campaign got that hard line reference to lethal aid softened to “appropriate assistance”.

    The passages in the FISA application can be seen in the screenshots in this blog post.

    https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2018/07/first-thoughts-on-the-carter-page-fisa-application.php

    Ms. Denman and the change in the platform plank again show up in the Mueller report on pp. 123-127 (pdf pp. 131-135).

    Byron York interviewed Ms. Denman’s (and Maria Butina’s) attorney, Robert Driscoll.

    https://ricochet.com/podcast/byron-york-show/maria-butina-and-the-russia-hysteria/

    Ms. Denman was interview by the FBI, the Mueller team, the SSCI, and the HPSCI. In that podcast that aired on May 8th of this year, he relates that Adam Schiff, along with his sidekick Eric Swalwell, seemed to already have a theory about Ms. Denman’s experience with the Russia/Ukraine platform plank. To me, it sounded like Schiff was trying to drive the same narrative in her interview that he is seeking today.

    The other statement Driscoll made that sticks out is that Ms. Denman communicated with some policy types in Washington DC before she wrote her plank amendment. Who were those people?

    For that matter, who is Diana Denman? She has been active in GOP politics for decades. We already know she is hawkish. Is she this Diana Denman? If so, she is a severe Never-Trumper. As such, her roll might not have been so innocently benign.

    I’ll stop here for now.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Sherri Young says:

      This Diana Denman.

      Liked by 3 people

      • Sherri Young says:

        3rd try. Obviously cannot post the link to her Twitter timeline.

        Her Twitter handle appears to be @dhyana77 .

        The photo looks too young for a 70+ y/o woman, but that could be an old pic from 1977.

        Please tell me what you think about all of the above. TY.

        Liked by 1 person

        • Angel Martin says:

          I think the fact that they cited a political platform fight in a FISA application shows just how weak they knew the FISA application was.

          IF you have real grounds for a FISA warrant, you don’t put in nonsense like that.

          Liked by 2 people

          • Sherri Young says:

            So true, but here’s the thing: Ms. Denman’s advisors apparently helped her decide to offer and advocate for that specific plank to virtually lock in weapons for Ukraine.

            The Dimms, Never-Trumpers, and Deep State all seemed to be locked onto their Russia/Russia/Russia mantra. They got what they wanted on Russia. They did not get what they wanted on Ukraine, but that did not cause loud complaints. Now that Ukraine has popped up, there is huge outrage.

            Why?

            Could it be that they really do not care about Biden except in the context of not wanting attention turned to their piggybank Ukraine and our corrupt people who have been soaking money out of there? Biden is nonviable against Donald J. Trump. This is about saving their own skins.

            Liked by 1 person

        • dutzie60 says:

          I think you’re one hell of an investigator. Great work! Thanks.

          Liked by 2 people

  4. 335blues says:

    “…to benefit and sustain the status quo of the administrative state; and protect the larger DC community from the Trump disruption.”
    It also seems there might be a larger and DARKER MOTIVE beyond what is perceived
    as the status quo, in that is it seems the supervisory function of America’s spy agencies
    have seized some level of control over the federal government.
    Control by way of access to most, if not all, personal communications and information
    of elected, non-elected and appointed officials.
    This information could be used to influence, and even control, the decisions and
    actions of our elected officials.
    Can anybody say “JUSTICE ROBERTS”???

    Liked by 5 people

    • DeWalt says:

      By our Congress abdicating their responsibility of oversite and checks and balances to the unelected petty bureaucrats while they pursued the riches of the world.

      Liked by 2 people

    • grumpyqs says:

      Bullseye 335blues! Perhaps you have described the ONE WORLD ORDER that GHWB described in glowing future terms around 1991?

      Like

    • Life Coach says:

      Amen. The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, alone, names FISA judges. Doesn’t require Congressional approval.

      So, why has Chief Justice John Roberts, allegedly a Conservative, named 4 of 5 FISA judges who are Clinton & Obama appointees?

      It was John Roberts who named Judge Rudolph Contreras.

      Rudolph Contreras is, infamously, the FISA Judge who’s friends with Peter Strzok. The one Stzrok & Lisa Page texted about setting up a secret meeting with, just as Strzok was prepping to interview Gen Michael Flynn.

      Judge Rudolph Contreras then ended up as the Judge on the Gen Michael Flynn case. It’s hard to imagine the Chief Justice would not be following a case of Gen Michael Flynn’s magnitude and not be aware his appointee Rudolph Contreras was on the case. Especially considering Contreras would have been on his radar, as many people were asking about the FISC and which Judges had approved which surveilance warrants against the Trump team?

      After taking Flynn’s guilty plea, Judge Rudolph Contreras was then recused from the case. Only one of two people could have recused him. The top FISA Judge Rosemary Collyer, or….Chief Justice John Roberts.

      Has Roberts been naming Clinton/Obama FISA Judges because he’s been compromised by the Clinton/Obama machine? By their Praetorian Guard, aka the the CIA & FBI?

      Did Roberts grow a conscious and recuse Contreras? Were people starting to figure it out, so his hand was forced? Did Judge Collyer recuse Contreras and blow Roberts out of the water?

      These are questions few are asking, that I would love to know more about.

      Like

  5. evergreen says:

    Is all of this an insurance policy for McConnell?

    If he were to be primaried, he would have no incentive not to remove Trump from office.

    Like

  6. dustahl says:

    Just moving on to another high paying, deep state related job, is not acceptable for traitors to the American People

    Liked by 4 people

  7. islandpalmtrees says:

    Here we go with the CIA, again. I think, I would be safe in saying Jody (Joseph) Hunt is Gina Haspel most favorite attorney. And here is why.

    “CIA Director Gina Haspel, confirmed by the Senate last year amid accusations of involvement in torture, may have run a so-called ‘black site’ at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba. Haspel did not mention this role in her confirmation hearing.”
    http://www.rt.com/usa/448618-gina-haspel-black-site/

    By MARGIE BURNS on 12/21/2007, 6:49pm
    “DoJ attorney Jody (Joseph) Hunt, speaking for the five attorneys seated at the Defense table, called it “inconceivable,” a word he repeated, that the destroyed videotapes could relate to detainees at Guantanamo.”

    Like

  8. dcnnc says:

    Looks like Tash was Rosenstein’s evil little minion right hand.

    https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CREC-2018-04-10/pdf/CREC-2018-04-10.pdf

    Louie Gohmert:
    “Rosenstein needs to be stopped. He
    was involved in the original Russia
    uranium investigation as a U.S. attorney. He should never have been allowed
    to appoint a special counsel. If Rosenstein had any decency and ethics about
    himself, he should have told Jeff Sessions: I am not the guy who can do this
    because I was involved in that Russia
    uranium investigation that enriched
    Hillary Clinton’s foundation $145 million; I can’t do this.
    But since he is not ethical, he is not
    moral, and he doesn’t mind keeping the
    limitations running while they are
    looking elsewhere rather than at him
    and Mueller who is also the FBI Director involved in that Russia investigation where Russia was trying to get our
    uranium, neither one of them should
    have been able to accept.

    Rosenstein has got to go, and his assistant who so often keeps the good
    people who supported President Trump
    in the dark, Tash Gauhar, she needs to
    go. She needs to go, and Rosenstein
    should follow right out the door. Those
    people are doing more damage over
    there. They have got to go, and then we
    can try to salvage this country and our
    constitutional Republic.”

    Liked by 1 person

  9. bruzedorange says:

    I know this will sound simplistic to many, but it’s nonetheless true: the best means to turning guilty participants into cooperating witnesses is praying for it to happen.

    No physical entity has that kind of access to an individual’s conscience.

    Liked by 3 people

  10. trapper says:

    The McCabe memo is a window into the fundamental political/philosophical disconnect that underlies everything that is wrong at DOJ, FBI, State Department, the IC, and probably every other agency of federal government. The ultimate product of that disconnect was on display in the recent “Thank God for the Deep State” proclamations by some of the afflicted.

    The underlying affliction is a disconnect between the philosophical underpinnings of a representational democracy in which a nation’s government answers to its citizens, and an operational belief in which employees of that government see themselves as “citizen of the world” answerable only to a “higher calling,” independent of and unaccountable to both citizens and officials elected by citizens. This affliction’s ultimate manifestation was the creation of the CFPB, a perfect storm of Deep State unaccountability and Orwellian doublespeak where, under the guise of citizen “protection,” an agency was created with no accountability to elected officials or citizens, a Frankenstein monster ready to be activated against the very citizens it was supposed to protect. This affliction is fatal to representational self government and must be rooted out and destroyed.

    Only a person who views himself as answering only to a higher calling could take it upon himself to open a criminal investigation of an elected sitting president, his boss, over policy differences (the elected president determines what the relationship will be between the US and Russia), for firing the head of the FBI (who answers to and serves at the pleasure of the elected president) and for expecting the head of the FBI to profess loyalty to an elected president.

    The elected president reportedly told the new AG (Sessions) “you were supposed to protect me.” Indeed. This is precisely the opposite of an “offense.” The duty of every Attorney General is to protect an elected president against a coup d’etat orchestrated by unelected bureaucrats who view themselves as unaccountable to either the citizens or the officials they elect. In this, Sessions utterly failed. It remains to be seen how well Mr. Barr will perform this duty. A good start would be declassifying and making public unredacted versions of everything on Sundance’s list.

    Liked by 5 people

  11. ADDgolfer says:

    Dayum Sundance, fess up…
    You’re an ET from an advanced civilization, with a staff of dozens, and exist on 36 hr days?
    You articles read like chapters as if they’re can’t put down books
    Good Stuff

    Liked by 4 people

  12. Tashs Office says:

    http://thespygateproject.org/ocred_docs/docs/Bruce_Ohr_Calendars_Final_Version.pdf

    Bruce Ohr’s calendar has interesting references to the material in this post (Gauhar and Boeing).

    Like

  13. Judiciary says:

    From a May article in The Federalist by Willis L. Krumholtz: “Tashina Gauhar is a Department of Justice attorney who was deeply involved in applications to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance (FISA) Court, which were used to spy on the Trump campaign using the dossiers. Gauhar was also one of the few people to see or be notified of the existence of missing Hillary Clinton emails found on Anthony Weiner’s computer. Weiner was being investigated for pedophilia and was married to top Clinton aide Huma Abedin.

    Gauhar and Andrew McCabe sat on those emails, and a cursory investigation—led by anti-Trump FBI agent Strzok—was only conducted when FBI field agents in New York threatened to go public. Gauhar later played a role in recommending former attorney general Jeff Sessions’ recusal from overseeing Mueller’s probe.”
    Supposedly, photos of Gauhar have been scrubbed from the internet. Its also said that she would deliberately fail to notify Jeff Sessions of meeting times so he would be late and unprepared, yet no one else had any problems with timely meeting notifications.

    Liked by 2 people

  14. Daniel says:

    When information like this Tashina Guahar exiting, the source of the rumor should indicate which direction to look: ‘either’/’or’

    Am I the only one wondering why Sundance isn’t transparent or specific about the source of this rumor? It’s not like him to hold back unless he is protecting a source and not wanting to come out with the news. It kind of feels like we are being steered more than informed.

    Like

    • dutzie60 says:

      Quite the contrary.

      Like

      • Daniel says:

        Quite the contrary to what? Search the web. All references to this name and the word rumor originate HERE. Sundance always cites source articles of there are any in public.

        And since no definitive conclusion is being reached, the article’s new information can be summed up like this: “There is a rumor. If true or could mean this or that.”

        Objectively speaking, that’s not really news. It’s speculation based on unfounded rumor. GOSSIP.

        If you disagree, spell it out? How is this not gossip?

        Like

        • Mean Old Man says:

          Like speculating their is an underlying meaning in a conversation that is beyond what was actually said…

          Conversation -> Translation -> Interpretation -> Awesome Work
          Conversation -> Translation -> Democrat Interpretation -> IMPEACHMENT!

          We here read Sundance for his interpretation… Unlike the Democrat Interpreters that have an awful track record, Sundance hits quite often..

          Similar to why I listen to Dan Bongino…
          Dan writes a book providing speculation… Mainstream right-wing news breaks the information in the book as news a year later. Mainstream left-wing news breaks it 2 years later as side-notes and on page 17 between a Viagra add and a new recipe for “Mushroom Soy Tofu Casserole”.

          Like

  15. accountability we the people are waiting. . we ALL have been held hostage for at least 3yrs. . .

    Like

  16. rashomon says:

    Many kudos to Sundance on this post from Charles Ortel during today’s “Sunday with Charles – Terminate her Dark Foundation” hosted by Jason Goodman’s YT channel (about the 1::00 hour if you want to go directly to it. Prior to that, Charles and Jason discuss politics with three gentlemen from the UK and Scotland, which I missed for the most part due to other duties.

    The second half, which is still live, reports updates on the Clinton/Bush/Obama Corruption with Mueller and Comey as part of their complicity in attempting to bring down PDJT.

    Liked by 1 person

  17. It's what they do, not what they say. says:

    I need me a deep state job! Good old Tash, facing serious jail time (probably, though we don’t know for sure) gets a 6 figure job at Boeing instead. And, THEY still expect US to fight THEIR wars for them. I’m not thinkin’ so. Not no more.

    Liked by 1 person

  18. Sue says:

    I don’t know about everybody else but I’m sure having a hard time keeping up with all this.
    Sundance’s reporting is stellar, but just when I think I understand this puzzle, a whole new set of puzzle pieces present themselves. I never imagined The Swamp was so deep, wide, and pervasive!

    Liked by 2 people

  19. Richie says:

    Email this to Bondo Barr so he knows we know.

    Like

  20. Mary says:

    They should all go to prison if proved. Keep up the good work.

    Like

  21. Otherwise Law Abiding says:

    Kill them all. Problem solved.

    Like

  22. Otherwise Law Abiding says:

    Kill them all. Problem solved.

    Like

  23. Gil Stonebarger says:

    every day that goes by without justice simply empowers and strengthens the enemy. How long will YOU wait, dear reader?

    Like

  24. Night Flight says:

    If the charges come back as a conspiracy to overthrow the sitting President; it should be handled by military justice.

    Like

  25. David Farrar says:

    I would not be a bit surprised if there wasn’t a direct quid pro quo between Jeffery Epstein’s murder and keeping Julian Assange from talking, forever.

    And if AG Barr is supporting Christopher Wray, I am afraid he might be involved in this deep-state conspiracy as well.

    Like

  26. David Farrar says:

    It’s the military and Intel deep state who are in the midst of trying to overthrow our duly elected president.

    Like

  27. Pingback: EXCLUSIVE: New Evidence Shows Jeff Sessions Was Committed to Recusing Himself on His First Day as Attorney General

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s