The Myth of Modern “Global Markets” – Understanding Why Renegotiating National Trade is So Critical….

President Donald Trump has cancelled the Manufacturers Council and the Strategic Economic Advisory Board.  There are trillions of dollars at stake.  The members of the boards, and their representative companies, were being targeted by left-wing groups like Move-On.Org with boycotts and opposition.

There are massive international corporate and financial interests who are inherently at risk from President Trump’s “America-First” economic and trade platform.  Believe it or not, President Trump is up against an entire world economic establishment.

I will outline how it works below; and when you understand how it works in the modern era you will understand why the agents within the system are so adamantly opposed to U.S. President Trump.

The biggest lie in modern economics, willingly spread and maintained by corporate media, is that a system of global markets still exists.

It doesn’t.

Every element of global economic trade is controlled and exploited by massive institutions, multinational banks and multinational corporations.  Institutions like the World Trade Organization (WTO) and World Bank control trillions of dollars in economic activity.  Underneath that economic activity there are people who hold the reigns of power over the outcomes.  These individuals and groups are the stakeholders in direct opposition to principles of national economics.

The modern financial constructs of these entities have been established over the course of the past three decades.  When you understand how they manipulate the economic system of individual nations you begin to understand understand why they are so fundamentally opposed to President Trump.

In the Western World, separate from communist control perspectives (ie. China), “Global markets” are a modern myth; nothing more than a talking point meant to keep people satiated with sound bites they might find familiar.  Global markets have been destroyed over the past three decades by multinational corporations who control the products formerly contained within global markets.

The same is true for “Commodities Markets”.  The multinational trade and economic system, run by corporations and multinational banks, now controls the product outputs of independent nations.  The free market economic system has been usurped by entities who create what is best described as ‘controlled markets’.

U.S. President Trump smartly understands what has taken place.  Additionally he uses economic leverage as part of a broader national security policy; and to understand who opposes President Trump specifically because of the economic leverage he creates, it becomes important to understand the objectives of the global and financial elite who run and operate the institutions. The Big Club.

Understanding how trillions of trade dollars influence geopolitical policy we begin to understand the three-decade global financial construct they seek to protect.

That is, global financial exploitation of national markets.  FOUR BASIC ELEMENTS:

♦Multinational corporations purchase controlling interests in various national outputs and industries of developed industrial western nations.

♦The Multinational Corporations making the purchases are underwritten by massive global financial institutions, multinational banks.

♦The Multinational Banks and the Multinational Corporations then utilize lobbying interests to manipulate the internal political policy of the targeted nation state(s).

♦With control over the targeted national industry or interest, the multinationals then leverage export of the national asset (exfiltration) through trade agreements structured to the benefit of lesser developed nation states – where they have previously established a proactive financial footprint.

Against the backdrop of President Trump confronting China, and against the backdrop of NAFTA being renegotiated, revisiting the economic influences within the import/export dynamic will help conceptualize the issues at the heart of the matter. There are a myriad of interests within each trade sector that make specific explanation very challenging; however, here’s the basic outline.

For three decades economic “globalism” has advanced, quickly. Everyone accepts this statement, yet few actually stop to ask who and what are behind this – and why?

Influential people with vested financial interests in the process have sold a narrative that global manufacturing, global sourcing, and global production was the inherent way of the future. The same voices claimed the American economy was consigned to become a “service-driven economy.”

What was always missed in these discussions is that advocates selling this global-economy message have a vested financial and ideological interest in convincing the information consumer it is all just a natural outcome of economic progress.

It’s not.

It’s not natural at all. It is a process that is entirely controlled, promoted and utilized by large conglomerates and massive financial corporations.

Again, I’ll try to retain the larger altitude perspective without falling into the traps of the esoteric weeds. I freely admit this is tough to explain and I may not be successful.

Bulletpoint #1: ♦ Multinational corporations purchase controlling interests in various national elements of developed industrial western nations.

This is perhaps the most challenging to understand. In essence, thanks specifically to the way the World Trade Organization (WTO) was established in 1995, national companies expanded their influence into multiple nations, across a myriad of industries and economic sectors (energy, agriculture, raw earth minerals, etc.). This is the basic underpinning of national companies becoming multinational corporations.

Think of these multinational corporations as global entities now powerful enough to reach into multiple nations -simultaneously- and purchase controlling interests in a single economic commodity.

A historic reference point might be the original multinational enterprise, energy via oil production. (Exxon, Mobil, BP, etc.)

However, in the modern global world, it’s not just oil; the resource and product procurement extends to virtually every possible commodity and industry. From the very visible (wheat/corn) to the obscure (small minerals, and even flowers).

Bulletpoint #2 ♦ The Multinational Corporations making the purchases are underwritten by massive global financial institutions, multinational banks.

During the past several decades national companies merged. The largest lemon producer company in Brazil, merges with the largest lemon company in Mexico, merges with the largest lemon company in Argentina, merges with the largest lemon company in the U.S., etc. etc. National companies, formerly of one nation, become “continental” companies with control over an entire continent of nations.

…. or it could be over several continents or even the entire world market of Lemon/Widget production. These are now multinational corporations. They hold interests in specific segments (this example lemons) across a broad variety of individual nations.

National laws on Monopoly building are not the same in all nations. But most are not as structured as the U.S.A or other more developed nations (with more laws). During the acquisition phase, when encountering a highly developed nation with monopoly laws, the process of an umbrella corporation might be needed to purchase the interests within a specific nation. The example of Monsanto applies here.

Bulletpoint #3 ♦The Multinational Banks and the Multinational Corporations then utilize lobbying interests to manipulate the internal political policy of the targeted nation state(s).

With control of the majority of actual lemons the multinational corporation now holds a different set of financial values than a local farmer or national market. This is why commodities exchanges are essentially dead. In the aggregate the mercantile exchange is no longer a free or supply-based market; it is now a controlled market exploited by mega-sized multinational corporations.

Instead of the traditional ‘supply/demand’ equation determining prices, the corporations look to see what nations can afford what prices. The supply of the controlled product is then distributed to the country according to their ability to afford the price. This is how the corporation maximizes it’s profits.

Back to the lemons. A corporation might hold the rights to the majority of the lemon production in Brazil, Argentina and California/Florida. The price the U.S. consumer pays for the lemons is directed by the amount of inventory (distribution) the controlling corporation allows in the U.S.

If the U.S. harvest is abundant, they will export the product to keep the U.S. consumer spending at peak or optimal price. A U.S. customer might pay $2 for a lemon, a Mexican customer might pay .50¢, and a Canadian $1.25.

The bottom line issue is the national supply (in this example ‘harvest/yield’) is not driving the national price because the supply is now controlled by massive multinational corporations.

The mistake people often make is calling this a “global commodity” process. In the modern era this “global commodity” phrase is particularly BS.

A true global commodity is a process of individual nations harvesting/creating a similar product and bringing that product to a global market. Individual nations each independently engaged in creating a similar product.

Under modern globalism this process no longer takes place. It’s a complete fraud. Currently, massive multinational corporations control the majority of product inside each nation and therefore control the entire global product market and price.

EXAMPLE: Part of the lobbying in the food industry is to advocate for the expansion of U.S. taxpayer benefits to underwrite the costs of the domestic food products they control. By lobbying DC these multinational corporations get congress and policy-makers to expand the basis of who can use EBT and SNAP benefits (state reimbursement rates).

Expanding the federal subsidy for food purchases is part of the corporate profit dynamic. With increased taxpayer subsidies, the food price controllers can charge more domestically and export more of the product internationally. Taxes, via subsidies, go into their profit margins. The corporations then use a portion of those profits in contributions to the politicians. It’s a circle of money.

In highly developed nations this multinational corporate process requires the corporation to purchase the domestic political process (as above) with individual nations allowing the exploitation in varying degrees. As such, the corporate lobbyists pay hundreds of millions to politicians for changes in policies and regulations; one sector, one product, or one industry at a time. These are specialized lobbyists.

EXAMPLE: The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS)

CFIUS is an inter-agency committee authorized to review transactions that could result in control of a U.S. business by a foreign person (“covered transactions”), in order to determine the effect of such transactions on the national security of the United States.

CFIUS operates pursuant to section 721 of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended by the Foreign Investment and National Security Act of 2007 (FINSA) (section 721) and as implemented by Executive Order 11858, as amended, and regulations at 31 C.F.R. Part 800.

The CFIUS process has been the subject of significant reforms over the past several years. These include numerous improvements in internal CFIUS procedures, enactment of FINSA in July 2007, amendment of Executive Order 11858 in January 2008, revision of the CFIUS regulations in November 2008, and publication of guidance on CFIUS’s national security considerations in December 2008 (more)

Bulletpoint #4With control over the targeted national industry or interest, the multinationals then leverage export of the national asset (exfiltration) through trade agreements structured to the benefit of lesser developed nation states – where they have previously established a proactive financial footprint.

The process of charging the U.S. consumer more for a product, that under normal national market conditions would cost less, is a process called exfiltration of wealth.

It is never discussed.

To control the market price some contracted product may even be secured and shipped with the intent to allow it to sit idle (or rot). It’s all about controlling the price and maximizing the profit equation. To gain the same $1 profit a widget multinational might have to sell 20 widgets in El-Salvador (.25¢ each), or two widgets in the U.S. ($2.50/each).

Think of the process like the historic reference of OPEC (Oil Producing Economic Countries). Only in the modern era massive corporations are playing the role of OPEC and it’s not oil being controlled, it’s almost everything.

Again, this is highlighted in the example of taxpayers subsidizing the food sector (EBT, SNAP etc.), the corporations can charge U.S. consumers more. Ex. more beef is exported, red meat prices remain high at the grocery store, but subsidized U.S. consumers can afford the high prices. Of course if you are not receiving food payment assistance (middle-class) you can’t eat the steaks because you can’t afford them. (Not accidentally, it’s the same scheme in the ObamaCare healthcare system)

Individual flower growers in Florida go out of business because they didn’t join the global market of flower growers (controlled market) by multinational corporate flower growers in Columbia and South America, who have an umbrella company registered in Mexico allowing virtually unrestricted access to the U.S. market under NAFTA.

Agriculturally, multinational corporate Monsanto says: ‘all your harvests are belong to us‘. Contract with us, or you lose because we can control the market price of your end product. Downside is that once you sign that contract, you agree to terms that are entirely created by the financial interests of the larger corporation; not your farm.

The multinational agriculture lobby is massive. We willingly feed the world as part of the system; but you as a grocery customer pay more per unit at the grocery store because domestic supply no longer determines domestic price.

Within the agriculture community the (feed-the-world) production export factor also drives the need for labor. Labor is a cost. The multinational corps have a vested interest in low labor costs. Ergo, open border policies. (ie. willingly purchased republicans not supporting border wall etc.).

This corrupt economic manipulation/exploitation applies over multiple sectors, and even in the sub-sector of an industry like steel. China/India purchases the raw material, ore, then sells the finished good back to the global market at a discount. Or it could be rubber, or concrete, or plastic, or frozen chicken parts etc.

The ‘America First’ Trump-Trade Doctrine upsets the entire construct of this multinational export/control dynamic. Team Trump focus exclusively on bilateral trade deals, with specific trade agreements targeted toward individual nations (not national corporations). ‘America-First’ is also specific policy at a granular product level looking out for the national interests of the United States, U.S. workers, U.S. companies and U.S. consumers.

Under President Trump’s Trade positions, balanced and fair trade with strong regulatory control over national assets, exfiltration of U.S. national wealth is essentially stopped.

This puts many current multinational corporations, globalists who previously took a stake-hold in the U.S. economy with intention to export the wealth, in a position of holding contracted interest of an asset they can no longer exploit.

Perhaps now we understand better how massive multi-billion multinational corporations and institutions are aligned against President Trump.

RELATED:

♦The Modern Third Dimension in American Economics – HERE

♦The “Fed” Can’t Figure out the New Economics – HERE

♦Proof “America-First” has disconnected Main Street from Wall Street – HERE

♦Treasury Secretary Mnuchin begins creating a Parallel Banking System – HERE

♦How Trump Economic Policy is Interacting With The Stock Market – HERE

♦How Multinationals have Exported U.S. Wealth – HERE

 

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Big Government, Big Stupid Government, China, Economy, media bias, NAFTA, President Trump, Trade Deal, Uncategorized, US dept of agriculture, US Treasury, USA. Bookmark the permalink.

246 Responses to The Myth of Modern “Global Markets” – Understanding Why Renegotiating National Trade is So Critical….

  1. golfmann says:

    I hope he does…
    Frankly, in my opinion, it may be too late without divine intervention.
    I pray for that.

    Like

  2. CustomsBrokerNAFTA_SME says:

    I must take exception to this graph in SD’s post:

    Individual flower growers in Florida go out of business because they didn’t join the global market of flower growers (controlled market) by multinational corporate flower growers in Columbia and South America, who have an umbrella company registered in Mexico allowing virtually unrestricted access to the U.S. market under NAFTA.

    Not exactly accurate. Only flowers grown in MX qualify for NAFTA. OTOH, we also have FTA’s with a variety of Central and South American countries, granting them duty-free access to our cut flower market (and everything else). The flowers are flown into (primarily) MIA on a nightly basis for distribution all across the country.

    After he’s done with NAFTA, won’t surprise me at all when the others are revisited soon after.

    Like

  3. fleporeblog says:

    Everything you are seeing since VA has been orchestrated by these evil creatures! Everything they took 30 years to develop is being whipped away by our President. China 🇨🇳 is truly screwed. Not only has our President opened a 301 case against them but the renegotiation of NAFTA is going to kill them and these multinational corporations as well. These folks have used Mexico 🇲🇽 more than Canada to dump their products into for the Mexicans to sell to us under NAFTA. Mexico was just the middle man.

    I love ❤️ our President more today than yesterday because he is going to kill their game once and for all.

    Liked by 5 people

  4. p'odwats says:

    I’m tired of reading the doom and gloom statements of people on our side. Did anyone really think the Deep State was gonna go away quietly? It wasn’t gonna be smooth sailing. They’re threatening everyone from corporate CEO’s to regular everyday people who dare side with the president in trying to make this country great again. I knew it was going to be like this, but as always we have too many potato chip spined cowards who run at the first sign of trouble. The rank and file who supported the president will never abandon him. The left, the establishment Republicans and all those who oppose President Trump are following a path that is not sustainable for this country’s future. That what’s we keeps me from ever giving up. If we give them back power we’re done for as a nation. We can’t stop fighting even if the odds seem long and stacked against us.

    Liked by 8 people

    • VickyD says:

      Hear hear … bingo … spot on!

      Liked by 2 people

    • Maquis says:

      Never give up! Never surrender!

      Liked by 2 people

    • ed says:

      Yes, we can not give up. This is why they (Dems, MSM, Establishment Repubs, Multi-national interest, lobbyist groups) have been trying to find a way to take him out since he was elected. No this is not true, it’s been going on since he became the GOP candidate, they knew then it was serious, and there were trillions of dollars at stake. I have never seen anything like this in my lifetime. We must stand with the president. How by tweeting these politicians your disapproval, re-tweeting articles like this. Post articles to every social media outlet you have access to. Call these politicians. Don’t let them hear the end of the wrath of the people. My fear is with these trillions at stake, who knows where they will stop. I fear that it could end in revolution.

      Like

  5. scott467 says:

    Sundance,

    This is most helpful, thank you for taking the time to go over this again. It makes more sense, each time, because more of the underlying points have been understood and the new explanation makes more sense in the context of the previously established foundation.

    Repetition helps.

    It appears that the entire construct is dependent on deception and secrecy, i.e., if the public knew and understood what has been done to them, there would be a rebellion.

    And that is what must happen, the lid must be blown off this whole thing, in order to stop it. Why should we be in a knife fight in the dark? Surround the building, turn on the spotlights and watch the cockroaches run for the exits, right into arms of the Authorities or the American People, whichever shows up. Unlike the corrupt ‘Authorities’, the American People won’t be accepting any orders to ‘stand down’, so my bet is on the American People, and that’s as it should be. These cockroaches would be much safer in the hands of the ‘Authorities’.

    DJT is in a position to do it, to expose the whole thing. His people could craft a presentation that would have Americans so hopping mad that blood would be shooting out of their whatever. Maybe something like a 30 minute documentary style film uploaded to youtube’s newest competitor (to be created or identified and named). Or a series of five or six 20-minute episodes, ending each episode in a way that the viewer wants to know what happens next.

    In other words, understand the attention-span and expectations of your audience. Don’t drop a 1,000 page tome on their desk, give them a movie that is interesting, compelling and provocative, with facts, claims and further examples annotated with links below the video. Back it up with facts, ALL of it.

    And it needs to be personal. There needs to be faces and names and brief biographies of a representative sample of major players — the puppet-masters at the multinational banks, corporations and lobbying firms. The public needs to know their names and what they look like, no different than Bernie Madoff. The public needs to know who they are, these modern equivalents of Al Capone, Machine Gun Kelly, Bugsy Seigel, Dutch Schultz, John Gotti, Lucky Luciano, John Dillinger, etc.

    Dox ‘em.

    All of them.

    Make them famous.

    They are international criminals engaged in a global conspiracy.

    Public Enemy, Numbers 1 through 100, at least. From the highest kingpins to their Generals, Lieutenants and Captains, in descending order of importance.

    And name ALL of the Congressmen who have been paid off by them, and show how their votes were obtained in exchange for cash.

    Senators and Representatives wouldn’t even bother taking calls or holding ‘townhalls’, and they wouldn’t be going on TV to defend themselves. They would be running for their lives, fleeing the country. They would get chased down the street by mobs, and a lot of them wouldn’t escape.

    Most of them can’t run very fast.

    Liked by 5 people

    • Maquis says:

      I like it! Bring it!!

      Liked by 1 person

    • deanbrh says:

      Scot 467, just naming all the congressmen and their egregious moves would get the namer branded as a conspiracy theorist. This is a mega-ton of corruption for ordinary citizens to swallow. We’ve been Sundance’s scholars for at least 2 years ( many for longer) and EVERY posting of his has been a new revelation. We are eager consumers of his revelations, but the average citizen I think operates under the umbrella of ignorance-is-bliss. Most don’t WANT to know what our reality looks like! I’ve tried to guide so many friends and relatives to this site, but it’s too-bigga-eat, except in dribs and drabs over lunch and/or a cocktail.

      Like

      • scott467 says:

        I know what you mean, but I don’t think it’s a “hard sell” that our Congressmen are corrupt, lol!

        And we shouldn’t be afraid of the word ‘conspiracy’ or the possibility that someone might accuse us of such a thing. It’s just a word, with a clearly defined meaning. Explain what the meaning is, and then ask them, “what isn’t a conspiracy”?

        ……………………………….
        Conspiracy
        noun
        1. the act of conspiring.
        2. an evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious plan formulated in secret by two or more persons; plot.
        3. a combination of persons for a secret, unlawful, or evil purpose: He joined the conspiracy to overthrow the government.
        4. Law. an agreement by two or more persons to commit a crime, fraud, or other wrongful act.
        5. any concurrence in action; combination in bringing about a given result.
        ……………………………….

        Every single thing our Congress does behind closed doors is a ‘conspiracy’ by definition.

        I think just about everybody already knows that Congress is corrupt. We wouldn’t be surprising anybody with that information. Congress’ approval rating is what, single digits?

        There’s NOBODY defending Congress, because Congress doesn’t represent We the People, Congress (literally) represents They the Globalists against We the People.

        I’m just saying pull the curtain back so everyone can see just how corrupt our Congress really is. Don’t just claim it, prove it.

        Do it with style, like the dramatic moment when we called Russia’s bluff at the U.N. and revealed to the whole world the spy plane photography proving that Russian nuclear missiles were being smuggled into Cuba.

        People love that.

        The big ‘Reveal’.

        It’s the climax of almost every mystery / caper / spy film and novel ever produced.

        It explains everything, like Sherlock Holmes recounting each of the elements leading up to the solving of a murder.

        How often have I said to you that when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth?

        It’s elementary, my dear Watson 😉

        Like

        • deanbrh says:

          Hmmm, I had no idea Russia was smuggling nuclear missiles into Cuba! “The big Reveal” was big to some. Go find the drama and reveal stuff. I support your cause!

          Like

          • scott467 says:

            I should have said ‘Soviet Union’, a.k.a. the Cuban Missile Crisis. 🙂

            Cuban Missile Crisis
            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuban_Missile_Crisis

            The Soviet leadership believed, based on its perception of Kennedy’s lack of confidence during the Bay of Pigs Invasion, that he would avoid confrontation and accept the missiles as a fait accompli. On September 11, the Soviet Union publicly warned that a US attack on Cuba or on Soviet ships that were carrying supplies to the island would mean war. The Soviets continued the Maskirovka program to conceal their actions in Cuba. They repeatedly denied that the weapons being brought into Cuba were offensive in nature. On September 7, Soviet Ambassador to the United States Anatoly Dobrynin assured United States Ambassador to the United Nations Adlai Stevenson that the Soviet Union was supplying only defensive weapons to Cuba.

            On September 11, the Telegrafnoe Agentstvo Sovetskogo Soyuza (Soviet News Agency TASS) announced that the Soviet Union had no need or intention to introduce offensive nuclear missiles into Cuba. On October 13, Dobrynin was questioned by former Undersecretary of State Chester Bowles about whether the Soviets planned to put offensive weapons in Cuba. He denied any such plans. On October 17, Soviet embassy official Georgy Bolshakov brought President Kennedy a personal message from Khrushchev reassuring him that “under no circumstances would surface-to-surface missiles be sent to Cuba.”

            As early as August 1962, the US suspected the Soviets of building missile facilities in Cuba. During that month, its intelligence services gathered information about sightings by ground observers of Russian-built MiG-21 fighters and Il-28 light bombers. U-2 spyplanes found S-75 Dvina (NATO designation SA-2) surface-to-air missile sites at eight different locations. CIA director John A. McCone was suspicious. Sending antiaircraft missiles into Cuba, he reasoned, “made sense only if Moscow intended to use them to shield a base for ballistic missiles aimed at the United States.” On August 10, he wrote a memo to Kennedy in which he guessed that the Soviets were preparing to introduce ballistic missiles into Cuba.”
            .

            Adlai Stevenson shows aerial photos of Cuban missiles to the United Nations, October 25, 1962.

            .

            Like

            • deanbrh says:

              Kennedy was assassinated over the Cuban Missile Crisis, right?

              Liked by 1 person

              • scott467 says:

                “Kennedy was assassinated over the Cuban Missile Crisis, right?”

                ______________

                Who really knows?

                The Warren Commission was a farce.

                Like

              • Spar Harmon says:

                I was in the military [intelligence] during the Gary Powers incident, /the Bay of Pigs, and the Cuban Missile Crises, and many other things not known publically in which our country was involved.
                From my ringside or peripheral vantage, I had a pretty complete view of such things.

                I know of no satisfactory account of Kennedy’s death, and I did attempt to figure it out. I doubt your attribution, though.

                Like

                • deanbrh says:

                  I was not at all politically savvy in those days, but recently a friend told me the story of why Kennedy was killed and it had to do with the Mafia and Kennedy’s father and the Cuban Missile Crisis, but isn’t as if the friend purports to be any kind of authority, and I know he was not in the military ever. My brother-in-law was in the Navy at the time, 1953 or 54, I think. He’s 87 now so I assume you too, like me, are an ancient one! Thank you for your service. I love how Trump is concerned with improving conditions for vets!

                  Like

                • Spar Harmon says:

                  Thank you for your return note.
                  Just so you can adjust your sense of relevant timelines, 1959 to 1962 frames the events named and my service. Kennedy was assassinated in 1963.
                  I had many contacts who would have hinted yea or nay to me about intelligence community involvement if they knew of it. Within the community the awareness of covert operations would be generally distributed, but not the specifics.
                  The Bay of Pigs Operation was an extreme and humiliating SNAFU. Covert operations of such scope were sharply curtailed for some years except for South East Asian operations.
                  For many years I suspected a private ultra-right or left group with deep pocket financing, since Kennedy, like Trump, offended both. I was never able to eliminate that as a possibility.

                  Note in SD’s analysis of political spectrum extreme right and extreme left meet.

                  Global manipulators use this.

                  Like

        • kp3ace says:

          Traitors of the week! It would have to be more than one since there are so many it would take decades otherwise.

          Like

      • pyromancer76 says:

        Have faith. You are doing foundational work. Are you sure that “every posting of [Sundance’s] has been a new revelation? For most people? For most people’s guts? I think what Sundance is doing first and foremost is giving speech — making our unconscious conscious — to our suspicions. What is important is how many Americans have been suspicious — even if from very different backgrounds — for a very long time.

        His “speech” will have a multitude of effects. Yes, there are those who can’t take in the details or even the overall picture, but all of we readers now have these thanks to their author’s courage and intelligence. We know the big picture and have the details to supply bits and pieces here and there. Cocktail conversation, even if in little dribs and drabs — all the better.

        I live in California — I focus on jobs, a border if we want a country, and safety from vicious illegals and citizen criminals, when possible. Soon I will take on “welfare.” I notice some quietness. I think someone is listening, even though they also think or say, Trump (horrible person), Trump (authoritarian), Trump (crazy)..

        Liked by 1 person

    • kp3ace says:

      Thanks scott467, I was trying to figure out a way to say the same thing but you just said it more eloquently!
      Repetition works for me too!
      Video needed as a backup tool to prove to those that choose not to believe as well.

      Liked by 1 person

  6. SpanglishKC says:

    Can someone please expand on what Sundance means when he writes

    “where they have previously established a proactive financial footprint.”

    What does that mean? How does that work? Can you provide an example?

    I want to be able to fully understand what SD is saying so I can then turn and help others in my circle understand.

    Liked by 1 person

    • daughnworks247 says:

      Example using lemons:
      The multinational then exports the lemons to a country, like Belize or Egypt or Mongolia, where they have large “lemon” warehouses, contracts with distributors within those countries, and supply lemons to those consumers — almost as a monopoly — continuing the control of their prices.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Irisheyes says:

      I think that means the Big Players go into a poor country and buy up huge parcels of inexpensive land plus cheap businesses and factories. They also go in to grease the palms of local politicians and establish those corrupt relationships. Then, when the timing is right, the Players can exploit those assets when they begin to move their business interests out of developed countries and into those more 3rd world countries. The framework has already been built. Make sense?

      Liked by 1 person

  7. crab1776 says:

    Hi Everyone!

    I have been lurking here for a long time and thought it’s time to start chiming in. There is just so much noise out there. Thank you SD for all your good work and to everyone else for standing firmly behind our President. He is taking on the domestic and global establishment.

    I didn’t think this council of CEO’s was going to last very long…many of them are cowards and look out for their own self-interest. I give President Trump credit for extending the olive branch, but I just don’t think they were ever going to really work with him to promote the America First vision.

    Thanks again for the economic analysis.

    Liked by 1 person

  8. Aguila2011 says:

    Thanks Sundance for your great outline of the scheme at work by Malevolent Greedy Bastards! In point 4, I about choked when it said “… through trade agreements structured to the benefit of lesser developed nation states” and could just picture them saying such with a straight face! Ha! To the benefit my ass! Just another form of rape and pillage. They don’t care for those people on the other end just like they don’t care for the people in their own land. They can ease their conscience by telling themselves it is not about “countries” but the “global” economy and all is fair, so long as you are the winner.

    Like

    • Maquis says:

      They don’t even have a “land”, they are Supra-National, above all of us and our Precious Constitutions.

      I have a comment in moderation on this very point in response to KC’s request above…

      Guess I’ll find out if I got a passing grade on my Multi-National Corporation Pillaging Strategies Essay later, I haven’t slept yet. CTH is addictive! Someone call Jeff Sessions, STAT! I’m gonna have withdrawl symptoms whilst I sleep!

      Like

  9. Jefff says:

    An elaborate scheme of “LEGAL PLUNDER ” (theft ) by the GLOBALISTS HUMAN FARMERS .

    DAMN GREAT ARTICLE SUNDANCE !! ” Trillions of dollars at stake ”

    After 30 years of this we see THE BIG CLUB now openly not THE BIG CLUB …. ACTUALLY WRITE LEGISLATION in FAVOR of their multi-national corporations including TAXPAYER SUBSIDIES !!

    “THEY ” ” the monolithic and ruthless conspiracy ” including THEIR agents in the UNIPARTY DC get away with this “LEGAL PLUNDER ” because WE allow them to divide us !!

    The final solution for the “fundamental transformation of America ” ( Obama ) is a ” violent and bloody revolution ” ( ANARCHY USA 1966 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FY2W1pQMI0w ). The PRETEXT for the GLOBALIST owned ENEMEDIA to declare in unison …..

    ” We need a new system . This one has failed !! Capitalism has failed , The constitution won’t allow us to ‘HELP YOU ‘ . We need a GLOBAL GOVERNMENT SYSTEM …blah blah blah blah ”

    These GLOBAL interests need the average Soccer Mom and NASCAR Dad to be in FEAR to convince them the ONLY SOLUTION is a NEW AMERICAN CONSTITUTION. And it’s already written and lying in wait !! https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/master_file/newstatesconstitution.htm

    THUS …the propaganda theater in Charlottesville VA where the GLOBALISTS funded and lead BOTH SIDES of a STAGED event to disparage the word “NATIONALIST ”

    When TRILLIONS of dollars are at stake …” THE ENDS JUSTIFY THE MEANS “

    Like

  10. daughnworks247 says:

    Expansion of the globalists control over food commodity prices accelerated as a direct effect of the crash in 2008. Obama HELPED the globalists while the USA lost 20K individual farms a year.

    Like

  11. daughnworks247 says:

    Our little bitty company does biz in 14 countries and we’ve been involved in global trade since 2003.
    To even a casual observer, we can see industries fall, one at a time, to the control of the multi-nationals.
    It started with small things, glasses and spatulas (remember Anchor Hocking?), and now, it’s cardiology equipment and bulldozers. Komatsu is not good for our economy; Caterpillar is.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s