Maybe, just maybe, political reality is starting to permeate Chris Cuomo. Or it could be that Chris Cuomo is attempting to shape-shift by dropping pretenses. Whatever it is, this encapsulated segment by the former CNN host is a little surprising insofar as it is generally accurate.
According to those who know him best, Cuomo is not a very bright fellow. However, on the issue of money in politics as outlined in this segment, Cuomo is essentially dropping truth bombs. WATCH:
A good example of Big Money shaping political outcomes was discussed yesterday in the story about RFK Jr.
There’s a billionaire named Timothy Mellon who has essentially been funding RFK Jr to the tune of $25 million, while simultaneously funding the Make America Great Again SuperPAC to the tune of over $115 million.
It has been a while since the people running the Biden administration have used the stage set they constructed at the beginning of Joe Biden’s installment.
Factually, no one ever explained why the people controlling Joe Biden went to all the trouble to construct a completely fake Oval Office and White House set in the Eisenhower office building. Everyone just seemed to accept the stage and subsequent performances as if they were some type of ordinary communications choices. The acceptance always struck me as very odd. I digress.
Today, it is noted that a U-Haul truck appears at the White House, oddly timed to coincide with Joe Biden giving his farewell address to the DNC convention audience in Chicago. The accompanying notation with the picture says, “NEW: U-Haul moving trucks are parked outside of the White House today — hours before Biden’s planned “farewell” address to the DNC. Are they finally giving Biden the permanent boot?”
The fact that a U-Haul is used just seems strange to me, considering that the White House could use any packing, shipping and/or secure transport company they wanted. It’s not like costs are an issue; so, why use a U-Haul?
Never to be accused of doing anything timely for the American people, the republicans on the House Oversight, Judiciary and Ways and Means committees just released a 291-page report today [full pdf here], highlighting the evidence of Joe Biden’s corruption in office.
The Republicans couldn’t wait to send money to Ukraine. The same Republicans rushed a FISA reauthorization bill. The Republicans also fast-tracked a Green New Deal bill under the guise of an Inflation Reduction Act, and they delivered a fake border security bill. However, it took them three years to outline Biden’s pay-to-play schemes. Go figure.
Joe Biden is heading to the exit, his cohort Kamala now represents the face of the administration, and here comes the Chaff and Countermeasures committee members with their outrage and shock.
As noted by Politico, “House Republican investigators accused President Joe Biden of engaging in “impeachable conduct” as part of a long-awaited report. It’s unlikely to change a reality the party has faced for months: They don’t have the votes to impeach him.” (more)
There is a considerable discussion starting about Kamala Harris potentially having a problem with alcohol {LINK}. In part, people are reviewing the videos of Mrs. Harris and there appears to be a pattern of odd behavior that seems like she is drunk.
Mrs Harris has always been a rather odd person, with a propensity for speaking in gibberish. I guess the question is whether that goofy personality is really just the outcome of Kamala Harris drinking. Some of the video segments being highlighted are shared below.
What do you think? Is Kamala Harris under the influence of alcohol?
BREAKING: Multiple police officers have come forward stating that Kamala is 100% intoxicated in this clip and she would’ve been charged with a DUI if she was behind the wheel of a car. pic.twitter.com/odcy5rRHvW
The DNC Convention starts tomorrow. I have been requested to repost “THE BIG WHY” explanation. When we understand just how much corruption was needed in the weaponization of the modern IC, we start to understand why the effort to hide it will continue.
President Barack Obama and his Attorney General Eric Holder did not create a weaponized DOJ and FBI; instead, what they did was take the preexisting system and retool it, so the weapons only targeted one side of the political continuum. This point is where many people understandably get confused.
In the era shortly after 9/11, the DC national security apparatus was constructed to preserve continuity of government and simultaneously view all Americans as potential threats. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) were created specifically for this purpose.
What Barack Obama and Eric Holder did with that new construct was refine the internal targeting mechanisms so that only their ideological opposition became the target of the new national security system. This is very important to understand as you dig deeper into this research outline.
Washington DC created the modern national security apparatus immediately and hurriedly after 9/11/01. DHS came along in 2002, and within the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 the ODNI was formed. When Barack Obama and Eric Holder arrived a few years later, those newly formed institutions were viewed as opportunities to create a very specific national security apparatus that would focus almost exclusively against their political opposition.
It is not difficult to understand why the Kamala Harris campaign, led on strategic coordination by Brian Fallon, rejected the efforts of Robert F Kennedy Jr to coordinate with the campaign. However, to understand the obvious reason a few realities must be accepted.
Prior to the switching of Biden with Harris, RFK Jr was polling around 8 to 12% in most commonly accepted polling results. After Kamala Harris replaced Joe Biden, RFK Jr ballot support dropped to around 4 to 6%. The reason was simple, the democrats supporting RFK Jr, disenfranchised with Biden, returned once he was replaced.
The current 4 to 6% support that remains with Robert Kennedy Jr are never-MAGA republicans, single issue vaxx voters and never-Trumpers. Why would Fallon want to interrupt that convenient fracture?
So long as the GOPe voters have an alternative, Kamala is in a good place. The campaign of Kamala benefits from RFK Jr wandering around the landscape of tenuous republicans herding potential Trump ballots into a convenient RFK Jr vote shredder. Fallon doesn’t want Kennedy to stop this process.
It is genuinely amazing how many astute political observers cannot see this dynamic playing out in real time. The political gravity of Robert F Kennedy is apparently so strong, there are many republican ballots vulnerable to it.
In the video example below, Patrick Bet-David, Vincent Oshana, Adam Sosnick, and to a much lesser extent Tom Ellsworth are so captured by the previous enticements of RFK Jr, they cannot see the current play and understand why Fallon is rejecting him. WATCH:
The media construct around the political campaign of Kamala Harris took a big hit today when Harris held a campaign event in Raleigh, North Carolina, but did not have a big-name music star to bring the crowds. As a result, only a few dozen supporters showed up to hear the preliminary economic plan of Kamala Harris.
The official crowd size was listed at 109 participants, including media as Kamala read from a teleprompter at the event.
Harris has pledged price controls for groceries, which will drive up the price of groceries. Harris has pledged $25,000 in down payment assistance for first-time homebuyers, which will drive up the price of housing. And Harris has pledged to use taxpayer funds to build 5 million residential housing units for low-income illegal aliens.
Remember when the Australians were putting people into forced quarantine camps for failing to take vaccinations? Remember when the New Zealanders were arrested for going on a subversive trip to McDonalds and violating their containment zones? Remember when Americans were arrested for going to playgrounds or parks? Remember when EU citizens were arrested for not carrying their vaccine passports?
Well… If you remember those examples that factually happened, then you can likely see how this is just another part of the continuum. WATCH:
2024 = Orwell’s 1984!
A compilation of the terrifying sweeping censorship we’re seeing in the West on social media. pic.twitter.com/VHr9shpbZR
There is no such thing as “misinformation” or “disinformation“, there is only information.
You were not born with a brain requiring you to believe everything you are told. You were born with a brain that allows you to process information and formulate opinions using discernment.
There is only INFORMATION. The variables within the information you receive are accuracy or inaccuracy; truth or lies.
Anyone who considers themselves a political analyst yet doesn’t watch this guy closely is missing the forest while staring at trees. Team James Clyburn and Team Barack Obama head the control mechanisms within the private corporation known as the DNC, the club apparatus.
In this recent interview Clyburn talks about how he views the state contests and the expanding electoral map he needs. If you know the game, if you truly understand how the ballot collection game is played, then you understand Clyburn is hedging his AME bets because he has to.
Clyburn’s strength is also his weakness, his five states, 17 regions and roughly 100 precincts, are now in the spotlight for intercepting ballot fraud. You can tell he is a little twitchy about it, that’s why he is talking about Georgia, Ohio and Florida. If Clyburn was confident in Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Nevada, he would not be mentioning any other state. He’s not confident.
Additionally, Clyburn talks about spending time with Tim Walz campaigning and getting to know him. However, notice how Clyburn talks about boy and girls in school with conflicted feelings about their sexual identity and how “Coach Walz” was willing to put himself into the role of “sexual advisor” for them. ¹At 03:48 you will see a big disturbing signal flare. There’s something very dark in the background of that context. WATCH (prompted):
.
¹Who talks about this stuff? Seriously, why would Clyburn even mention it. He just pulled the thought out of the air, unprompted, for no apparent reason. It’s just plain weird and out of place.
Any adult male, particularly a coach, who puts themselves into a position of talking to high school-aged girls about their sexual identity – is a groomer, period. Yup, Clyburn knows something, you can sense it too.
Within that “knowing” Clyburn talks about, I think we can all identify the leverage that made Walz the ideal DNC candidate for the construct of Kamala. Sure the ‘stolen valor’ aspect is serious and shows poor character; but it is the groomer aspect that is much more disturbing. Trust your instincts.
Kamala Harris hired Eric Holder to do the background vetting on Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, prior to the announcement of Walz being her VP candidate.
Keep in mind, Barack Obama and Eric Holder do not have any issues with Tim Walz as the VP candidate. Factually, Walz is a very unstable person, prone to an intemperate disposition, has no problem targeting children for his fetish ideology under the guise of gender reassignment (cutting off the genitals of children), and is a proud Marxist.
Against the backdrop of ‘who he is’ the difference between ‘who he presents himself to be‘ is the real issue. The embellishment on his military record is just one facet of the mask he wears.
Remember, for the professional left, especially Barack Obama and Eric Holder, fabrication and lies are viewed as positive traits. Through the prism of controlling behavior, controlling what people do and ultimately leveraging/threatening a person to ensure adherence to an objective, the lies are part of how professional leftists control people. This is all very dark and twisted stuff.
During any ‘vetting’ process, Eric Holder and Barack Obama would view any “stolen valor” type issue as a net positive. The voting left are essentially “NPCs,” brainless nonthinkers who follow the hive mindset.
Democrats will not be at all bothered to support a candidate who is a known liar with a sketchy background in manipulating children. After all, Walz went into teaching for a reason and the professional left now consider ‘grooming’ and youth exploitation as a part of the modern social norm.
I mean, seriously, think about it without pretense. Sexualizing children has gone all the way to cutting off genitals to make the adults around the children feel better. What we are discussing is the voting pattern of the people who openly do not see a problem with sexploitation of children. Do you think embellishing a military record matters to this tribe?
