Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney left the United Nations General Assembly and went directly to the New York Times for a pre-scheduled interview with fellow leftist travelers intent on influencing the U.S midterm election.

Carney having previously appointed Clinton/Obama Democratic operative Maia Johnson as his Chief Operating Officer within his office, obviously had one agenda in mind as he strolled into the Times office for his pre-planned operation.

Within the hour-long conversation, the Canadian Prime Minister had several key points of emphasis in his objective. The top-line hook to draw in the audience was his first statement about having prepared for military combat operations against the United States.  [ARTICLE HERE] Key points below:

(1) Carney developed contingency plans to use military combat operations against the United States.  Yes, it is transparently obvious this is a political statement.  His mentioning of this is meant to create the traditional leftist victimhood position used in all psychological operations.  Carney follows this outlandish statement by saying these military plans are no longer needed because he now feels he has “a good relationship” with President Trump.

[…] “Prime Minister Mark Carney of Canada said that he had prepared over the past year for the “extreme tail risk” that President Trump might order military action against Canada but disclosed that the two men have spoken “frequently,” even since trade talks collapsed last month, describing a tense, evolving relationship.

Mr. Carney suggested that he had carefully examined the possibility of U.S.-led military action, but declined to discuss in detail what that involved. “I think you have a responsibility in these roles to look at extreme tail risk,” said Mr. Carney, a former central banker for Britain and Canada. … “That’s just risk management. That’s not a base case, but it would be irresponsible not to” prepare.”

(2) Carney outlines how he intends to build a closer economic relationship with China as a hedge against Canadian dependency on the United States.  Given the statements made by Carney in Beijing, this does not come as a surprise; however, it is the expressed open intent to further attach Canada to China that should raise eyebrows.

“He talked about a focus on deepening economic — though not defense — relationships with China.”

Carney couched his Chinese intentions by saying he wanted closer relationships on all facets except military cooperation, as if that makes the proclamation less concerning.  Given the pre-existing influence already achieved by China in Europe and the U.K, Carney’s statements are in alignment with his EU-centric vision for the Canadian people.

(3) Against the backdrop of Elon Musk refusing to permit Ukraine to use Starlink satellite capabilities to strike Russia, Carney now says the U.S. satellite communication system is not reliable, and he is seeking to use European and Korean satellites to build out his strategic defense initiatives.

“Starlink, we will diversify away from, no question,” Mr. Carney said, referring to the American-based cluster of communication satellites, run by Elon Musk’s SpaceX, that have revolutionized the industry. He alluded to past disruptions and to Mr. Musk’s reluctance to provide Ukraine with data that would enable it to target parts of Crimea and Russia.

He acknowledged that other satellite network options are still less capable and resilient, but added that “from a defense perspective, and certainly pooled with other partners, Europeans, Koreans potentially, you get to scale and you cut that dependency.”

Obviously, the stenographers from the New York Times did not challenge Carney on how this position would align with NORAD or the enhanced golden dome security defenses recently proposed by President Trump.  It would be uncomfortable for the ideological and intensely political Prime Minister to have to square that logic.

(4) The former Bank of England manager also repeated his intention to replace the U.S. Dollar with an alternative global reserve currency, indicating that China could be the replacement as soon as “proper liberalization of China’s currency and financial system” could be achieved.

Mr. Carney on Wednesday also reiterated his long-held view that a global financial system wholly dependent on the U.S. dollar was unsustainable. A move to a multipolar system in which there are several reserve currencies would “provide more flexibility,” he said. … any pivot would be limited until there was “proper liberalization” of China’s currency and financial system.

This outlook is in alignment with his handlers in Great Britain, specifically the banking interests in the City of London, who now view economic nationalism as a threat to financial globalism.  President Trump’s position of sovereign national interests and respectful bilateral trade between nations runs counter to the multilateral mechanisms of globalist control.

♦ The interview is strategic politics using the claimed status of victimhood as a tool to justify a position against the larger interests of the representative body, the Canadian people.  Unfortunately, approximately 85% of the Canadian electorate are a captured psychology in alignment with Carney’s tactics.

The interview also highlights the urgency that now underpins the need for the United States to take aggressive action and sever all ties with Canada.

There are those who argue that cutting Canada away from the U.S. will only end with closer ties to China, thereby representing a significant threat on our northern border.  Those who hold this outlook need to accept that Canada is going to assemble those ties regardless of U.S. opinion.

It is not a matter of Canada threatening the U.S. by saying they will form a stronger bond with China if you don’t acquiesce to our parasitic economic demands.  Canada will form a stronger bond with China regardless of whether we permit them to remain a vessel for Chinese component goods into our nation.

Canada openly wants to be deeply partnered with China, and sovereign North American trade rules are against that interest.  Canada, under Carney, will undermine the U.S. position against Beijing at every opportunity.

It is for that reason that all ties with Canada must be reconsidered urgently and with extreme prejudice.  When the opposition is claiming false victimhood to set their demands, give the false victim the outcome of real victimhood.

The U.S. needs to act quickly to terminate the USMCA and put Canada on notice that all economic relations are over. There is zero compatibility between a protective USA and an exploitative Canada that will undermine U.S. manufacturing and trade by transshipping Chinese component goods into North America.

What are the rules and restrictions we have against China?

Apply those exact same rules and restrictions to Canada.

Sever all current multilateral trade agreements. Restrict cross-border access and apply the same visa restrictions to Ottawa that exist for Beijing.  Canada is proclaiming themselves as an adversary to America.  Treat them like one.

[New York Times Article HERE]