President Trump sends a shot across the bow to those who received a preemptive pardon from the administration of Joe Biden, noting the use of an autopen could nullify the issuance.
Via Truth Social – “The “Pardons” that Sleepy Joe Biden gave to the Unselect Committee of Political Thugs, and many others, are hereby declared VOID, VACANT, AND OF NO FURTHER FORCE OR EFFECT, because of the fact that they were done by Autopen. In other words, Joe Biden did not sign them but, more importantly, he did not know anything about them! The necessary Pardoning Documents were not explained to, or approved by, Biden. He knew nothing about them, and the people that did may have committed a crime.
Therefore, those on the Unselect Committee, who destroyed and deleted ALL evidence obtained during their two year Witch Hunt of me, and many other innocent people, should fully understand that they are subject to investigation at the highest level. The fact is, they were probably responsible for the Documents that were signed on their behalf without the knowledge or consent of the Worst President in the History of our Country, Crooked Joe Biden!” (Source)
If I had predicted this, I would have invested HEAVILY in adult diapers futures.
Depends…
On what part of ‘this’ you may think has not been predicted…
There is no refuge here for those who would sell out their fellow countrymen…
We The People are not at anyone’s disposal to sell out…
Or are there still more who have yet to “find out”…
Is El Salvador a most favored nation yet ?
Asking for a friend.
In God We Trust
Trust God
Fear not
So what’s going to happen to those people who were pardoned with the auto pen? Is it equivalent to a strongly worded letter?
They’re going to have to defend the pardon, at their cost. About $1,000/hour. Their money is going to jail too.
The process is the punishment.
Every time I think about what the Swamp did to simple Patriots that elected to voice their concerns about a stolen election, I support retribution against the other side. Make them suffer: drag out the proceedings, make them pay for lawyers and twist in the wind. Slow walk and appeal every single step of the way. Ruin them.
As a Conservative, I believe in playing by the rules.
The Globalists have changed the rules.
Fine.
Let us now play by THEIR rules.
There are no Rules of Engagement in a civil war…💥
No one is above the law. The j6 committee destroyed documents. We merely seek justice.
Ha their favorite talking point “no one is above the law” spoken in self-righteous serious tone
Yep, turnabout is fair play. 😁
Someone should be watching those Emergency Department Cardiac Beds in the DC burbs. Guessing those will be getting maxed out before long
Well, Hunter now lives in S Africa if that answers your question.
Last I heard, they’re really hating on white people there. Should be interesting…
Revoke his tax payer funded security detail. He isn’t special nor is he a minor. Let him or his dad pay out of pocket from their corruptly gained fortune. Tired of paying for it.
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114180054723679623
Done!!
WOW!! This is great!!!
(These people messed with the wrong guy😎)
Now …..The Big Ugly is rolling…🇺🇲
Awesome. PDJT revoked secret service protection from Hunter (18 agents) and Ashleigh biden (13 agents).
Trump did. TODAY!
Hunter’s and Ashley’s that is.
Here’s hoping that Mary McCord forged the signatures and that she is now liable for it.
Discovery will be interesting, if one even tries.
Crooks don’t like discovery.
I’ll call tag team on the auto pen: McCord and Lisa Monaco.
Shame about Lisa’s last name. Kinda liked late 60s high end Dodges.
Flipping her with the threat of $ loss and jail might help in the prosecution.
They will incur legal fees and defense costs that will be unbearable. Especially since Musk shut off the faucet.
The process is (part of) the punishment.
Glorious!!!
And about time those who who thought they were home free have a good taste of it.
So FUNNY!!!
Love the two different expressions on the faces of PDJT #45 and PDJT #47…. SO telling……
My brother refers to biden as ‘Dash’ as in between 45 and 47!
Unfortunately IMHO you are wrong. I imagine these grifters have $10-20, or $100’s of million of our tax dollars in their personal possession!
We all know nothing will come of this.
Optimism and patience are called for.
In your view, did the President’s remarks appear to be carefully considered and informed by counsel, or do they seem more extemporaneous, perhaps lacking in deliberation or external input?
I take POTUS Trump at his word.
He doesn’t usually make comments like this unless he can back it up.
In the end they might still be walking around free, that is true,
but in the meantime, they will have to accept/defend their pardons in court. This will cost money from liberal coffers now that the easy tax money is being shut off. The other part is they would have to accept their pardons (accept their guilt)
Thirdly, anything that keeps the DC corruption in the spotlight is time well spent.
Hopefully, they will need to not only defend their pardons, but defend themselves against the charges that the pardons would have protected them from.
Even so the idea of them cr@pping themselves is pleasant
Agreed. I take an extremely cynical view of anyone doing jail time. But I love the idea that the pardons they think they got now come with this spectre of doubt about them.
Now do Obama since he was not Constitutionally able to hold office.
..not to mention Obama the usurper SPYING on Hellary’s political opponent while ignoring her blatant abuses, including her hidden server and the deliberate destruction of evidence demanded of her in a Congressional subpoena.
If Biondi doesn’t play Barbie, should be a fairly simple matter of getting the WH staff of the Demented Fraud under oath re who had access to the autopen and who directed their criminality
The Democrats were so counting on simply running an autopen and teleprompter at the top of their 2028 ticket. Now it’s back to the crypt to find another waxen effigy.
It certainly looks like the biden presidency will be voided out one piece at a time. Factor in the hur report with statements made by sen lee and congressman johnson about biden’s mental decline and we may have a supreme court showdown!
Don’t forget Jake Tapper’s new book about how we were all lied to about Biden’s mental decline. I bet that he has all sorts of footnotes and evidence. Thanks, Jake.
Gateway Pundit/NY Post said an insider alerted them to this
Let’s see this translated into indictments, prosecutions and incarcerations. Until then this is nothing but clickbait.
If anyone knows how to post clickbait,it would be someone like yourself.
Let’s see if this sounds like I’m hanging up on you…
Click…
In God We Trust
Trust God
Fear not
Entire Cabal years nothing but a COUP / Illegal usurptation of the USA by Communists, not real Americans
bookmarked:
Former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund reveals what really happened on January 6th. Our Fox News interview with him never aired, so we invited him back.
Didn’t they Arkancide all of the cops who witnessed what really happened on January 6?
Evidently they missed one.
This is a fascinating interview. All the things Piglosi and Mitch the Bitch did to allow the coup to steal the election.
I noted a mute at 22:05 of Chief Sund as he responded to Carlson’s question.
I wonder what he said that could not be exposed?
I think the brilliance of this move is that is now going to start forcing conversations about a LOT of things that we have been discussing here for years, but which were NOT allowed to be mentioned in “polite company” lest we be called names and shunned!
The credibility of the media, already in the basement, is now going to drop even lower, and everyone in Congress, and on the national scene, who protected this man is going to become fair game! The bills that Joe publicly signed, after they were duly passed by both houses of Congress, are probably legally binding. BUT anything which was NOT personally signed, and especially things like Executive Orders and pardons, need to be scrutinized very carefully, especially in light of Mike Johnson’s revelation that Slo Joe had NO IDEA that he had signed an XO banning LNG.
If Joe is not capable of coming before a committee and verifying that he did indeed understand everything that was signed by an Autopen, then nothing he did not actually sign should be considered legal, IMHO!
I have embraced the “be[ing] called names and shunned!” part, and support the name calling and shunning them.
They must earn my respect otherwise I have no time for them.
There is a strong element of “Prove Joe Biden signed these” to this announcement. They very likely cannot.
Draw them out.
There’s a reason Trump has been doing very public signing ceremonies.
Yes, I brought this up many days ago. President Trump is making an ongoing point of publicly signing all of his executive orders in front of the press and then holding up the documents for inspection after he physically signs them.
They have been planning a counterattack on these fake pardons for some time.
Well they surely FA so FAFO.. or reap the whirlwind, as they say.
Joe and “Dr” Jill have been VERY quiet since January 21st! (When were they last seen in public? Anyone? Bueller?)
I suspect that they are huddled with attorneys and doctors, trying to figure out if they can “juice” him enough to sit through a deposition asking him about the XOs and pardons that he supposedly signed.
If they determine that he is too far gone, then I fully expect an announcement that he has “passed unexpectedly” in his sleep at his “beloved Delaware beach home”. If he can’t testify, they can’t prove that he didn’t know what he (or his Autopen) signed!
I believe you to be one hundred percent correct . Although I also contend FJB has been ” juiced ” so much that his mind is no longer viable or functional .
I don’t think there’s enough juice to get him through a depo
What is to prevent Biteme from lying and saying he authorized the autopen use for all of the things he signed.
No way will he not lie to save his hide and the Obama clan and the CIA.
I DON’T THINK THIS OTTO PEN HAS LEGS.
Was it used to sing all the documents in question and the pardons w/o Biden knowing about it or approving it?
ABSOLUTELY! But proving it is probably not going to happen because he will lie.
Sing is what we need Biteme to do. 😆
Who has Biggest Balls? President Trump has Biggest Balls. Hugely!
Titanium, too!
Is there a process or trail that “proves” Biden actuated the signature transaction? Or rather, there may be rules in place like there is someone who can use it for replies to thank you cards, for birthday cards, etc but maybe an electronic trail of signing for release of funds or more serious functions is required? Is there a gps stamp from when and where the signature was actuated?
Well, two of Biden’s signatures were done in the White House but Joe was on a tropical island, out of the country at the time.
There were 2 different autopens apparently
Is This the Key Aide Behind Biden Autopen Pardons? Biden White House Staff Secretary Lashes Out at Trump For Declaring Biden’s Autopen Pardons “Void”
The Oversight Project pointed out that Neera Tanden was the White House Staff Secretary when Joe Biden autopenned pardons from a golf course in the US Virgin Islands.
Neera Tanden was a frequent mention in the leaked Podesta emails released by Wikileaks.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/is-this-key-aide-behind-biden-autopen-pardons/
MAGA ! 👊👊❤️❤️🙏🏻🙏🏻🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Who controlled the auto pen? They must know. Or will this end up being like the Epstein files, JFK files, MLK files, Cocaine Bear-the WH files, Seth Rich files, J6 Bomber files, etc, etc, etc, etc…..
One possibility –
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/is-this-key-aide-behind-biden-autopen-pardons/
We can all be sure the Left is panicking over this!
When I typed in ‘legality of autopen signatures’ on on my DuckDuckGo search engine, the AI Assist robot had this to say:
“Autopen signatures are legally valid for official documents, including presidential pardons, as there is no law stating that a president must physically sign a document for it to be binding. Legal experts confirm that the use of an autopen does not invalidate the authority of the signature.”
Laughably, AI Assist used as its sources for this opinion, the BBC and Time! Please note that I didn’t ask anything about presidential pardons, just about the legality of autopen signatures in general…but AI Assist made that inference on its own!
I’ve used autopen signatures on legal documents many times before and my experience was that such documents always included a cover letter or other contextual material requesting my consent that it be used. Without such a cover letter, ANYONE could autosign my signature to ANY document under the sun!
And that’s not legal! Just as Biden’s autosigned pardons are not legal without out additional contextual documentation in which he gives his express consent to use it! I very much doubt such a written consent exists.
But since Biden would be required to MANUALLY SIGN such a consent, what would be the point?
Thanks for confirming how badly compromised duckduckgo is.
I use Brave search for anything other than buying paper clips. Their autoreply from their AI is usually not terrible.
The use of the autopen is not the primary issue.
The primary issue is whether or not Biden was aware of, understood, or authorized the document being signed.
Assuming he was not and did not, then the question is – – – who was doing this? Who authorized doing it? What was their staff position? What other documents did that person authorize the use of the autopen for?
As someone else mentioned, discovery could be very interesting
There is literally archived footage of Biden explaining, in considerable detail, that he issued the pardons and why.
This smells like an illegal power play. There’s no way the courts will nullify the pardons.
If there still is an “auto pen” at the whitehouse fill it up with the j6 committe criminals.😡
Ooohhhh…
I LOVE that man!
The pen masters will be identified and they will need testify to congress. Just thinking about the types of questions they will be asked. We saw Biden’s fingers and hands working, so why do this in the first place? Crazy!
Hands are no good without a brain.
That eliminates the entire Democrat Party
Brilliant!
GOD IS SO GOOD!
Autopen violations should result in Auto Penitentiary.
Hee.
That was good enough for Wordman.
I was only half joking when I suggested here that President Trump should pointedly address outgoing President Joe Biden during his inaugural speech, to inquire of Joe what year this is and who is the President of the United States. I’m not so certain Joe could have answered those simple questions, which are basic queries asked on routine mental competency exams.
Remember that those pardons had been “signed” by Joe within hours of President Trump’s inauguration.
I laughed all day about this. Every time I think about it, or someone mentions it. Laughing. Tears……oh, the joy of it all!!!
On a sober note. This article may be the antidote to all the poison WE ALL have endured. I hope that some of it can be useful, not just for the Judges but all of these people that have attacked President Trump and all Americans.
WAYNE ROOT: Federal Judges Are on The Payroll of China, the CCP and Mexican Drug Cartels. Wanna Bet? Here’s How to Stop Them.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/wayne-root-federal-judges-are-payroll-china-ccp/
It must really suck to be Liz Cheney right now.
I would think that it has always sucked to be Liz Cheney.
Yes but now it sucks MOR…..
Just thinking about auto pen validity. Would anyone use auto pen to sign their family will and trust documents? How would things go if the family will was contested? Can a notary notarize an auto pen signature? Of course not. There are not enough adjectives available to describe how clumsy and stupid this was. Arrogance? Incompetence? I really hope that we find out in the end how that whole clown show went down there.
E-signatures are essentially auto pens.
And we all use them – mortgages, student loans, taxes, etc.
“E-signatures are essentially auto pens.
And we all use them – mortgages, student loans, taxes, etc.”
————-
Not me, I still write checks. I enjoy the grumbling in the checkout line
President Trump knows what he is doing. I think it is a good strategy. He has DOJ backing his play. There is going to be grief for those who persecuted, impeached and waged bogus law suits against him. Also, they lied to the people about so many things. Like the so called insurrection, which was really the criminals cover up of the stolen election. Just wait and see. 😉
Biden did NOT with Hunter’s pardon…it was personally signed about a month earlier. Gives support to your premise….
Kinzinger says bring it weak little man. Thems strong words son.
Kuck Kinzinger may get his wish.
Laughing, lightening is perfect!
I bet the “Unselect Committee” wished they new who operated the “magic money computer” at Treasury.
They All are going to need it. How many people were enslaved in the DC prison under false pretenses?
Equals how many lawsuits, jury awarded settlements? What a day to be alive!
This seems to be a pretty lonely opinion, but I don’t see much hope for ultimately overturning the auto pen stuff.
I would think the presumption would be that’s its use was authorized, especially for pardons that Joe spoke about publicly (granted, semi-coherently). Barring video or several high-profile, eye-witness whistleblowers (ha, fat chance), I don’t see how one can prove a negative here.
Nevertheless, I certainly don’t object to investigations and arrests, even if they ultimately fail in achieving convictions. As long a the perps don’t have a basis to sue for a windfall. There is value in the hassle factor. 😁
.
Your arguments have validity. There is still an open issue that seems to be ignored. The proxy signature of the autopens don’t appear to be replicas of Biden’s actual signature.
That said, but for actual fraud being proved, it seems to me that were the Supreme Court to invalidate the use of autopen signatures on legally binding actions, contracts, and legislation, they might do so only for things “going forward” since anything else could create a mess. (E.g. Obama authorizing autopen on legislation from thousands of miles away.)
.
I think the difference here is “Obama authorizing”. That suggests to me there is documentation showing he approved the use of the autopen, and for what purpose.
I doubt there is a stack of papers Biden signed or indicating he “authorized” every single document that was autopenned.
In the past few years, I have gone through a couple real estate or banking transactions. Each required the use of E-signatures extensively. Sometimes I had to draw my signature on a computer screen, while others allowed me to just choose a font for my “signature”.
In every instance, there was a primary document I had to sign in which I agreed to the use of an E-signature for all of the documents involved in the transaction.
If they were so sloppy as to use the autopen on everything, I doubt they worried about getting some kind of cover document authorizing its use for each specific act.
.
What kind of documentation? If, e.g. Obama authorized extension of the Patriot Act from Hawaii because he didn’t want to fly back… that documentation wouldn’t have his actual “pen” signature on it either.
Faxed sigs are easily “pasted”. Emails carry no real sigs. Emailed attachment of a scan of a purportedly hand-signed letter maybe, if followed by the actual letter, but then there’s a period of uncertainty that could cause serious issues. Audio file of a telephone call? Maybe. Zoom video file? Maybe before “deep fakes”. All better than nothing, but not perfect.
I myself refuse to do or accept e-signatures, and refuse to do or accept “remote notarization” which has become accepted of late. I also refuse to do zoom court hearings, and except when there are extraordinary circumstances and provided there is a court reporter physically present with the person being deposed, also refuse to do zoom depositions.
.
I don’t disagree with what you said, but I still suspect there is something any Obama aide could pull out to show he “authorized” the use of the autopen for a stated purpose. Whether that is legal or not is another question.
As for autopens and usage, this is a good explanation of someone who had control of one.
Edited to add the full text of the post:
@MZHemingway
Some insights on autopen – I had custody of one as an Aide de Camp (Generals Aide):
These function and are setup to run off of a common access card (CAC). Generally they are assigned to an individual or an office with certain authorities proscribed in writing prior to use. For example use of an auto-pen could be authorized to sign birthday cards.
The key is these authorities need to be approved by the signature authority prior to utilization, whether for blanket usage or one off scenarios. “The autopen is generally used for routine or authorized tasks.”
Use of an auto-pen is then logged electronically and physically into a logbook. Which in my case was subject to audit at anytime and I would review monthly with the Signature Authority or another representative from the Command.
The point in all of this is that it is highly unlikely pardons were authorized to be given via autopen. It is also unlikely that a review or decision took place that involved President Biden. The Biden Administration itself was prone to act out of step with the President and on multiple occasions missed basic details such as autopen usage.
In the case of these pardons, an accompanying authorization from President Biden should have been readily available and an audit log of who used the auto-pen. The fact that these Pardons were literally being released as Biden was engaged in face to face meetings represent a last act of desperation by his handlers to cover their tracks.
If someone used it without Biden’s authority, that would represent a breach of ethics (and likely the law). An Autopen would not hold up to legal scrutiny.
.
A “blanket” authorization for autopen use seems perfectly fine for routine things that do not have specific legally binding import, such as autographs, signatures on courtesy letters, signatures on memos to members or employees pertaining to minor issues, signatures on routine checks for recurring and auditable payments/
There can be no such kind of similar authorization for what are serious one-off legally-binding presidential actions, let alone non-delegable functions, such as the pardon power, or signing a bill into law, or signing a treaty.
.
I don’t disagree and am not arguing any such blanket authorization exists for anything more important than a birthday card.
They all use auto pens. This is a petty argument.
I spent my twenties in the WH supporting two VPs under different administrations. There’s literally an office in there that manages all the logistics behind auto pens.
If you don’t think an auto pen is valid, then neither is an e-signature online. Everyone’s taxes, mortgages, student loans, etc. would be void.
This will be dead in the water. More theatrics. Shrug.
@Jackie Smith-I respectfully reject your entire premise. Your argument is boring. If that is all you have you didn’t have any association with the White House. Nice try ……
It’s not valid in the WH, or any of the other cases mentioned, if someone else “autopenned” on your behalf. Which I believe is the issue at hand. That would then be forgery, fraud, and identity theft I am sure amongst other things.
the issue is probably more about the ‘knowledge of’ the matter. I can not fathom that someone could e-sign my tax return for me without my knowledge or consent. Hey, I’m Fred, I haven’t talked to LRM but I’ll just sign for him. That’s forgery.
The point of the auto pen Biden signature is entirely missed by you as well as your examples of its use. Basically, the argument is that Biteme’s autopen signature was forgery. He didn’t actually sign the documents and he didn’t authorize the auto pen to be used to sign them and or he had no idea what he was giving permission to be signed.
Yes, electronic sigs. Are used, but it has to be me electronic signing and knowing what I am signing and not you electronically signing for me W/ o my permission and knowledge. Forged electronic signing and illegally using them is forgery.
.
Different issue. In the case of taxes, mortgages, student loans and whatnot, the other party is asking for and accepting the e-signature. That other party, the only party with standing to complain, has waived that right by contract. NO ONE is obligated to accept an e-signature.
In the case of a presidential action, the “other party” here — US — didn’t ask for a proxy signature or waive our rights.
.
They wanted to keep an empty figurehead in place rather than invoke the 25th Amendment, which would have been very expensive politically to them. Now they will pay the price for not doing the right thing. I believe the Supreme Court will uphold the annulment of most things auto-signed for Biden.
One of the first witnesses called in any court where an argument is made that the autopen is valid should be Robert Hur.
I’m still scratching my head over how a pardon can be granted to anyone who hasn’t been charged or convicted of a crime.
.
Ford pardoned Nixon and it was accepted. There doesn’t appear to be any case law interpreting the pardon power as applicable only to actual crimes that have been formally charged.
.
Accepted ? Maybe . Definitely not contested . 🤔
.
Issues:
(1) Did the President authorize the signing by autopen.
(2) Even if he did, if he wasn’t present, is this method of signing (apparently started by Obama) legal. See article that it’s not at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1908354
(3) In the case at hand, are either of the two autopen signatures even replicas of Biden’s signature (they don’t appear to be.)
.
All I can say is “Fight, Fight, Fight!”
President Trump has always been cautious about the legality of his actions in the past.
I am curious. Has he sought legal advice from the Constitutional Lawers in the White House and DOJ on this before making this declaration?
I would dearly love to know who is advising him on this issue. I would feel more comfortable with this decision if we (the public) knew who his council is and what their experience is with Constitutional law.
.
President Trump has numerous lawyers and advisors. I would suggest, however, that you research and analyze the legal issues yourself. If you feel unable to do that, then I would suggest that perhaps it would be even more difficult for you to analyze the breadth of opinions uttered over time by any particular lawyer to decide whether or not that lawyer’s opinions make you feel comfortable.
.
It’s an open question that does need an answer. POTUS’s have been using autopen’s for a while now. DOJ has one of their “letter’s” they write themselves proclaiming that due to the sheer volume of docs that require the signature of POTUS, the Autopen is the only means to actually accomplish the job. However, does that mean anyone within the exec. Branch can use the autopen and “play POTUS”? There must be an agreed upon approval process, right? Trump’s “TRUTH” post infers this process we not followed. However he’s not very clear if he’s referring to the use of the Autopen or issuing pardons wasn’t followed. I suspect he’s referring to the use of the autopen. At least that’s how I read his message!
Also requiring clarity from the courts. What is this process? Can a POTUS sign several Pardons in DC using the Autopen while they themselves are out of country on vacation as was the case with the J6 committee pardons? If they treat autopen like Docusign, probably, but assume an approval process must be met. Was that process met? I suspect not and is what Trump is referring to.
I wonder if his firing of the top attorney in the DOJ handling pardons is a part of this. She was fired a couple/three weeks ago.
Did they discover she was not doing/ignored some of the steps you mention?
Perhaps an insider whistleblower in action from Biden’s staff?
“President Trump sends a shot across the bow to those who received a preemptive pardon from the administration of Joe Biden, noting the use of an autopen could nullify the issuance.”
This is an excellent move. Treat the pardons as if they are completely worthless. Bring charges against any one of the recipients, then let them fight it out in the courts proving they ARE valid.
I suspect a LOT of information would become public proving without a doubt they are not valid.
Do they really want to risk that becoming public? Do they want to risk other autopenned documents also declared invalid?
This action is somewhat akin to pulling Canada in as another State – be careful what you ask for! It’s a mixed bag in that they can be held accountable, but they will also gain the protections of the 5th, and bury the truth that would convict them. Likewise bringing Canada into the USA would guarantee a massive new liberal block that would happily support the abolition of the 2nd Amendment and consistently elect socialists to Congress. I’m hopeful that Canada bravado is simply another master troll and negotiation tactic.
The doge whiz kids are all computer geniuses. Have the doge team look into the use of the auto pen and correlate it with Biden‘s position on a daily basis and very quickly they should be able to tell whether Biden was the one who did the auto pen signature or anyone else. Every auto pen will have an electronic trail that can be traced back to a server or ultimately, a computer, laptop, or tablet and even phone it should be very easy to prove a fraud.
I hope Hunter Biden didn’t go to the part of S. Africa where the cannibals are. They think his name is Hunter Bite Him.
Biden was ALREADY found mentally incompetent to stand trial, as a result of the Hurr investigation. —It was read into the Congressional Record on February 14, 2024!!
I declare the entire Biden Regime Null and Void after revelations of Election Fraud
It’s not like Biden’s dead. Why doesn’t the media wake him up and ask him about these last minute pardons and if he approve them.
Go after them. If the criminals are not held accountable, we will see their behavior again, only twice as bad. There are a handful of very bad people that must be prosecuted, and more importantly, their lies must be exposed for all to see.
I wonder who would have the burden of proof here. It appears there is clear proof of use of the auto pen but then must Biden prove it was done with his consent? And then what happens when/if the current administration challenges whether he was mentally capable of giving consent regardless of whether the autopen was used or not