President Trump economic policy -vs- Joe Biden economic policy
When wages (blue line) are above inflation (red line) our income is growing, life is good and the working class has more disposable income to enjoy life. However, when wages (blue line) are lower than inflation (red line) our income is shrinking, life is a struggle and the working class has less disposable income to enjoy life.
♦ Point One – Nothing happens accidentally. The road to a “service-driven economy” is paved with a great disparity between financial classes. The wealth gap is directly related to the inability of the middle class to thrive.
♦ Point Two – There is nothing of value behind the obtuse term “service-driven economy.” The multinationals are paying for this administration, just like they paid the Obama administration; paying for economic policy that advances their interests. Congress goes along with the K-Street demands, because Wall Street is now the primary benefactor of legislative intent. Nothing about their effort is done with American interests in mind.
To go deep, keep reading.
♦ Point Three – Traditional Fascism was defined as an authoritarian government working hand-in-glove with corporations to achieve totalitarian objectives. A centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, using severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition.
That governmental system didn’t work in the long-term because the underlying principles driving free people rejected government authoritarianism. Fascist governments collapsed, and the corporate beneficiaries were nulled and scorned. Then along came a new approach to achieve the same objective.
The World Economic Forum (WEF) was created to use the same fundamental associations of government and corporations. Only this time the corporations organized to tell the governments what to do. The WEF was organized for multinational corporations to assemble and tell the various governments how to cooperate to achieve control.
Fascism is still the underlying premise, the WEF just flipped the internal dynamic.
The assembly of the massive multinational corporations, banks and finance offices now summon the government leaders to come to their assembly and receive their instructions. Some have called this corporatism. However, the relationship between government and multinationals is just fascism essentially reversed with the government doing what the corporations tell them to do.
…A massive multinational corporate conglomerate; telling a centralized autocratic government leader what to do; and using severe economic and social regimentation as a control mechanism; combined with forcible suppression of opposition by both the corporations and government.
Then we broke the glass, hit the emergency button and called Batman.
♦ Point Four – Donald J Trump was/is a walking red-pill; a “touchstone”: a visible, empirical test or criterion for determining the quality or genuineness of anything political. I have been deep enough into the network of the Deep State to understand the scale and scope of this enemy. To think that President Trump alone could carry the burden of correcting four decades of severe corruption of all things political, without simultaneously considering the scale of the financial opposition, is naive in the extreme.
POTUS Trump was disrupting the global order of things in order to protect and preserve the shrinking interests of the U.S. He was fighting, almost single-handed, at the threshold of the abyss. Our American interests, our MAGAnomic position, was/is essentially zero-sum. His DC and Wall-Street aligned opposition (writ large) needed to repel and retain the status-quo. They desperately wanted him removed so they could return to full economic control over the U.S, because it is the foundation of their power.
Without Donald J. Trump, these entities would still be operating in the shadows. With Donald J. Trump, we can clearly see who the real enemy is.
In these economic endeavors President Trump was disrupting decades of financial schemes established to use the U.S. as a host for their endeavors. President Trump was confronting multinational corporations and the global constructs of economic systems that were put in place to the detriment of the host (USA) ie YOU. There are trillions at stake; it is all about the economics; everything else is chaff and countermeasures.
In most of the modern post-war industrial era (1950-1980), banking was a boring job and only slide rule bean counters and actuarial accountants moved into that sector of the workforce. Most people don’t like math – these were not exciting jobs. Inside the most boring division of a boring banking industry were the bond departments within the larger bank and finance companies.
The excitement was in the actual economy of Main Street business. The giants of industry created businesses, built things, manufactured products, created innovation and originated internal domestic wealth in a fast-paced real economy. Natural peaks and economic valleys, as the GDP expanded and contracted, based on internal economic factors of labor, energy, monetary policy and regulation.
Main Street generated the pool of political candidates, because the legislative conduct of politicians had more impact on Main Street. Simply, the business agents had a vested interest in political determinations.
Political candidates courted industrialists, business owners, and capitalist giants to support them. As a consequence, Main Street USA was in control of DC outcomes.
Despite the liberal talking points to the contrary, this relationship was a natural synergy of business interests and political influence. It just made sense that way, and the grown-ups were generally in charge of it.
♦ Commercial banks courted businesses because bankers needed deposits. Without deposits banks could not generate loans; without loans banks could not generate profits…. and so it was. By rule, only 10 percent of a commercial bank’s income could stem from securities.
One exception to this 10% rule was that commercial banks could underwrite government-issued bonds. Investment banks (the bond division) were entirely separate entities. The Glass-Steagall banking laws of 1932 kept it that way.
However, mid 1970’s bank regulators began issuing Glass–Steagall interpretations -that were upheld by courts- and permitted banks and their affiliates to engage in an increasing variety and amount of securities activities. After years of continual erosion of the Glass-Steagall firewall, eventually it disappeared.
This became the origin of the slow-motion explosion of investment banking. If you look back historically from today toward 1980 (ish), what you will find is this is also the ultimate fork where economic globalism began overtaking economic nationalism.
Banks could now make money, much more money, from investment divisions issuing paper financial transactions, not necessarily dependent on actual physical assets. The transactions grew exponentially.
The bond market portion ultimately led to the ’07/’08 housing collapse, and derivative trading (collateralized debt obligations or CDO’s) generated trillions of paper dollars. Long before the ’08 collapse, business schools in 1980 began calling this the second economy (a false economy, or the invisible economy).
The second economy, which ultimately became the global economy, is also the Wall Street investment economy. Two divergent economies: Wall Street (paper), and Main Street (real).
There is no real property, real capital, real tangible assets in the Wall Street economy. The false economy is based on trades and financial transactions, essentially opinions. Paper shifts, and buys and sells based on predictions and bets (derivatives).
Ford Motor Company (only chosen as a commonly known entity) has a stock valuation based on their actual company performance in the market of manufacturing and consumer purchasing of their product. However, there can be thousands of financial instruments wagering on the actual outcome of their performance.
There are two initial bets on these outcomes that form the basis for Hedge fund activity. Bet ‘A’ that Ford hits a profit number, or bet ‘B’ that they don’t. There are financial instruments created to place each wager. [The wagers form the derivatives] But it doesn’t stop there.
Additionally, more financial products are created that bet on the outcomes of the A/B bets. A secondary financial product might find two sides betting on both A outcome and B outcome.
Party C bets the “A” bet is accurate, and party D bets against the A bet. Party E bets the “B” bet is accurate, and party F bets against the B. If it stopped there, we would only have six total participants. But it doesn’t stop there, it goes on and on and on…
The outcome of the bets forms the basis for the tenuous investment markets. The important part to understand is that the investment funds are not necessarily attached to the original company stock, they are now attached to the outcome of bet(s). Hence, an inherent disconnect is created.
Subsequently, if the actual stock doesn’t meet it’s expected P-n-L outcome (if the company actually doesn’t do well), and if the financial investment was betting against the outcome, the value of the investment actually goes up. The company performance and the investment bets on the outcome of that performance are two entirely different aspects of the stock market. [Hence two metrics.]
Insurance products create an even larger subdivision within the false economy as hedgers wagered on negative outcomes. The money wagered is exponential – some say more than a quadrillion currently floats.
♦ Now you realize, in hindsight, there had to be a point where the value of the second economy (Wall Street) surpassed the value of the first economy (Main Street). Investments, and the bets therein, needed to expand outside of the USA. Hence, globalist investing.
However, a second more consequential aspect happened simultaneously.
The politicians became more valuable to the Wall Street team than the Main Street team; and Wall Street had deeper pockets because their economy was now larger.
As a consequence, Wall Street started funding political candidates and asking for legislation that benefited their interests.
When Main Street was purchasing the legislative influence the outcomes were beneficial to Main Street, and by direct attachment those outcomes also benefited the average American inside the real economy.
When Wall Street began purchasing the legislative influence, the outcomes therein became beneficial to Wall Street. Those benefits are detached from improving the livelihoods of main street Americans because the benefits are “global” needs. Global financial interests, investment interests, are now the primary filter through which the DC legislative outcomes are considered.
♦ Most people think when they vote for a federal politician -a House or Senate representative- they are voting for a person who will go to Washington DC and write or enact legislation. This is the old-fashioned “schoolhouse rock” perspective based on decades past. There is not a single person in congress writing legislation or laws.
In modern politics, not a single member of the House of Representatives or Senator writes a law, or puts pen to paper to write out a legislative construct. This simply doesn’t happen.
Over the past several decades, a system of constructing legislation has taken over Washington DC that more resembles a business operation than a legislative body. Here’s how it works right now.
Corporations (special interest group) write the legislation. Lobbyists take the law and go find politician(s) to support it. Politicians get support from their peers using tenure and status etc. Eventually, if things go according to norm, the legislation gets a vote.
Within every step of the process there are expense account lunches, dinners, trips, venue tickets and a host of other customary financial way-points to generate/leverage a successful outcome. The amount of money spent is proportional to the benefit derived from the outcome.
The important part to remember is that the origination of the entire process is EXTERNAL to congress.
Congress does not write laws or legislation, special interest groups do. Lobbyists are paid, some very well paid, to get politicians to go along with the need of the legislative group.
When you are voting for a Congressional Rep or a U.S. Senator, you are not voting for a person who will write laws. Your rep only votes on legislation to approve or disapprove of constructs that are written by outside groups and sold to them through lobbyists who work for those outside groups.
While all of this is happening, the same outside groups who write the laws are providing money for the campaigns of the politicians they need to pass them. This construct sets up the quid-pro-quo of influence, although much of it is fraught with plausible deniability.
This is the way legislation is created.
If your frame of reference is not established in this basic understanding, you can often fall into the trap of viewing a politician, or political vote, through a false prism. The modern origin of all legislative constructs is not within congress.
Now, ask yourself this important question….
…. Who is writing the details of the Build Back Better bill?
Joe Biden has no idea, and that my friends is entirely by design.
This chart is seriously mind blowing. I’ve known this to be the case from personal experience with wage/salary growth and being in the marketplace, but the starkness of the results of the two economic policies as presented in this graphic leaves no doubt that a sizable portion of the electorate are legitimately insane to vote for this and more so to continue to defend doing so.
If health supersedes all in terms of one’s duty to have concern, then the acquiescence to [fake] vaxxes tells one everything he needs to know about the competency of the public.
And next week the administration will show the same chart. But of course they will erase the red line (inflation) and show only the blue line (wages) and start the chart from April 2021. “See, wages are up, Biden’s Build Back Better economy is working!”.
“Nuts!”
Home run, Sundance. Hole-in-one. Thank God for your words. Thank God for you and yours.
And now you know why McConnell happily worked with Schumer for a one time waiver on the filibuster so the dems could raise the debt ceiling. It wasnt done for our well being it was done for the globalists well being.
We haven’t had a proper budget in over a decade. Both parties held congress in that time . Instead we get resolutions and fiscal sleights of hands.
The Uni-Party. Let’s hope corruption reaches a tipping point soon.
Yes! NOT “Both parties held Congress at that time,..” ONE party, the UNIPARTY held controlvof Cogress, the WHOLE time.
As for “Majority” and “Minority” status, thats just a construct, to fool the rubes.
Congress swaps Majority/Minority positions, like people change their socks, and as is politically expedient.
We all saw, as Ryan blatantly wrapped a ribbon around the gavel, and GIFTED it to Pelosi.
He was making good on his commitment, made to “the small group” so House Dems could initiate impeachment.
We see the SAME thing happening now, as many Dems are “retiring”; they fully intend for the House to go Rep, next mid-term.
Probably the Senate, but a very narrow Majority, so Mitch can use his stalwart stable of “wafflers” i.e. Murkowski, Collins, Romney etc to be seen pushing legislation pleasing to us, but oops, couldn’t get it passed.
“THATS why you need to donate more $ to winred, so we can elect more R’s!”
I’ve seen this game before my friend, but I don’tcknow if you know who I am.
Cause I been there, and I saw what you did, saw it with my own two eye,.
So wipe off that grin, cause I know where you been, and its all a PACK OF LIES!
Make Congress and the Swamp irrelevant.
STATE governments, thru Extreme Federalism, CAN by exerting their Constitutional authority, STRIP the Federal govt of much of its authority.
They just have to DO it.
They HAVE the authority; its innate, and just cause they haven’t exerted it before, doesn’t mean they surrendered it.
FDA was created in 1915, IIRC. NOTHING in the Constitution gives the Federal govt the responsibility or authority to regulate which drugs are OTC, which are Rx only, which are Controlled substances, and which are illegal under any/all circumstances.
But, when they did it, no State objected. And, they made it “illegal” under Federal law, to cultivate, distribute, sell, possess or consume marajiuana.
In recent years STATE Governments have passed laws regarding medical and recreational mj, and established dispensary licencing, and laws regarding cultivating, distributing, selling, possesing and consuming mj, in direct contravention of establishes Federal law.
And although the Feds initially THREATENED to withhold Federal funds,…they DIDN’T, cause thats a canard, an empty threat.
Unless the original authorising legislation EXPLICITLY states certain conditions the State must meet, in order to recieve the authorised funds,..the Fed can’t withhold the funds.
For instance, Fed $ for interstate highways states the Fed detirmines the route, or else they withhold the funds.
But, they can’t withhold highway dollars, cause of mj laws.
States COULD tell the Fed, to stick Fed education requirements like Common core, and unless the authorising legislation for education $ specifically says “only if the State teaches common core” they still get the funds.
Fed has no authority to enforce 90 percent of the regulations they have promulgated.
THE party with standing is State governments. With Strong Governors LIKE Desantis, backed by strong State legislatures, WE could strip the bloted Federal buerocracy of most of its power.
And the beauty is, as Desantis has demonstrated, it doesn’t require ALL States, just a few.
State governments CAN address many issues, even those where the Feds claim pre-eminence (like immigration).
Just need strong America First governors supported by strong America First majority legislatures.
One thing I’ve noticed over the last 40 years is that when the Democrats take over, the first thing to go is your retirement money. The next is your savings.
Two factors. They want your money so you have to rely on the government. Secondly redistribution of wealth. Share the misery and lo and behold.. rely on the government.
What was the purpose of Monopoly? Wasn’t it to be the landlord of record and own every square inch of real estate for the purpose of squeezing rent?
If independently wealthy savers are beyond the mandates of State, then massive inflation will bring them closer. All others, of course, are increasingly within the clutch. No saver escapes the State when the State owns the currency.
But when everything is free the chart will change.
Joe I Love Juicy Biden will reach a point..probably around February when the 10 pounds of crap in the 3 pound bag hanging over his head breaks open and he will- mark these words… blame the American people for the rotten economy. Just watch.
I’m thinking we ll see some kind of palace coup to remove Kammy from the board. Right now they need her 51st vote so everyone stays where they are. Once the gop takes the Senate in enough numbers in 2022 she is as disposable as FJB.
<Once the gop takes the Senate in enough numbers in 2022 she is as disposable as FJB>
I’m not so sure about that…
the Senate has to approve new VP.
gop doesn’t want that situation.
MITCH doesn’t want that situation..
So, since (generally) what Mitch wants, Mitch gets (in the swamp, and especially in the Senate) he will try to engineer a SLIGHT majority only.
So he can use his jokers, Collins, Murkowski, Romney etc. to fail to pass anuthing he feels politically he needs to put up for a vote, but doesn’t actually want to pass.
THIS may present an opportunity; because he isn’t looking to pick up more than 1-2 seats, we MAY be able to take a seat or two away from a Dem-U that he is not expending much energy on?
A1(America First)
IMCDA(In My Cold Dead Arm)
Uniparty neoliberalcons desperately tell you who they don’t want you to vote for.
They announce themselves daily on fake news.
-Neocon RINO Elitists Are Afraid Of America First Leadership
https://rumble.com/vqg59i-neocon-rino-elitists-are-afraid-of-america-first-leadership.html
I would put good money on your prediction coming true Mike. You have achieved predictive capability from observation of his past deeds, that’s no small feat. I can already see the press conference…
or he’ll blame it on President Trump.
But, his head IS 10 lbs of crap, in a 3 lb. bag!
Psuckie already has!
once again THANK YOU SUNDANCE .God Bless be well R.D.
Sundance has posted this basic primer more times than I can recall at the moment. Each new posting is driven by another event or new, additional consequence of the original actions, and the story includes the requisite edits/additions that address those impacts or new findings.
Still, Sundance is 100% correct in repeating this primer, because every time it is repeated here in CTH, I see dozens of NEW lightbulbs glowing in the comments underneath. New readers encountering this information for possibly the first time in their life, or more “veteran” Treepers who perhaps have just realized the significance of this lesson, maybe because of some new context with which they can identify.
It’s good to be a Treeper.
And the lesson never fails to jar the reader into a clearer understanding of the bigger picture. Indeed, Bravo Sundance. You are our shaman.
Everytime I share CTH with an acquaintance Sundance shortly thereafter posts something that I pray that person sees.
How blessed we are, may more so be.
Mai oui, Maquis!
I ordered business cards, cause their inexpensive, easy to carry and share.
NOT passing myself off, in any way as being affiliated, and I make that clear.
But, whenever I meet someone I think is a potential recruit, I give them one.
Also have reprinted several of Sundances posts, on different topics,…so if that topic comes up in conversation, I can give them a copy, which of coarse has the website prominently on it.
Sew a seed, plant a TREE!
I did street promotions for a big night club, the biz card is great.
I drop CTH economic commentaries on economic sites to widen the audience reach.
Like you, I look for individuals/comments across the
networld that seem receptive.CTH has friends across big tech social media, so I wander through Alt-Tech too.
I recall this happening with an earlier iteration, Sundances primerbon Trumponomics, which I think of as “Maganomics 101”.
The one that talks about “lemons or widgets” and how multinationals control all the lemons in the World.
First time I tried to read it, my eyes glazed over after first two paragraphs.
The next time, I got maybe 1-2 paragraphs further. This went on, for 20 readings or so, and then the lightbulb turned on.
OMG, I GET it! WHAT a feeling that is, to “graduate” from Sundances MAGANOMICS 101 class!
Bingo!
True that. The first few times I read his postings on this subject I had difficulty absorbing the content and thus wrote it off. But through repetition it finally began to sink in.
A senile man had the helm of the Ship of State – what could go wrong?
The answer is in your name. 😀
You are right. I knew there must have been a reason I picked that name.
Man no, a senile old puppet, more probable.
Question becomes who are the puppeteers. Not the front people, the ones pulling their strings.
My wife and I grew up and worked our way through school in the rust belt of the 1970’s and early 80’s.
I am convinced that the destruction or globalization of the industries in that region were the first shots in this globalist
war.
It made no sense to those who were there at the time that these hard working, committed work forces suddenly became obsolete.
It is not smart to leave a man with nothing left to lose.
It’s also not smart to leave a man with nothing to do. A lack of individual productivity/personal responsibility is a big part of what is wrong with America.
Much as I hate to say it, but Ronald Reagan had a big hand in this fiasco when he advocated for NAFTA. I railed against NAFTA from day one, but my voice (and the few other voices that I knew who also contended against its passage) was just too small.
NAFTA was the first BIG break for K-Street vs Main Street. It just snowballed from there every time that another trade agreement was signed.
Richard Nixon fired the first suicidal shot when he “opened ChYna”.
Bingo!
In 1971, Nixon also closed “the gold window”, refusing to let foreign central banks redeem their dollars for gold, facilitating the devaluation of the U.S dollar which had been fixed relative to gold for almost thirty years.
While not quite a default on US debt obligations, by closing the gold window the government rescinded a financial commitment it made to the rest of the world at Bretton Woods in 1944, that set up the monetary system after WWII.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/New-Economic-Policy-United-States-history
Clinton is the one who signed it into law.
And, wasn’t there a politician that ran for POTUS, railing against NAFTA, …”that great sucking sound,..”
Oh, yeah PEROT. And some party stalwarts blame him, for getting Clinton elected,..as if Bush sr would have been any better.
And yes, Buchanan also railed against Nafta,..Ron Paul,..
Most Populist/Nationalist challengers the RNC can derail, “by any means necesary” (cheating) in the primaries.
The few who get the nomination, like Goldwater, they work with DNC, MSM and IC to derail.
If that STILL doesn’t work, they try a manufactured Oct surprise.
If THAT doesn’t work, they stick them with a VP (Bush, Pence) and riddle their admin with plants, that will derail their agenda, as much as possible.
And, as an ultimate “Insurance policy”, they can set them up for a threat of Impeachment, to force resignation.
They have perfected the system, as a way to secure their power against any who would challenge it.
That loss will only become more and more pronounced.
A good k9 trainer knows, that if you do not give employment to a good dog, it becomes a “self employed” bad dog.
If you take peoples livelihoods, and their hope for the future, you had better be prepared for the wrath that follows…
The WAR started a long time ago, many believe around 1915, its just that we didn’t KNOW we were being attacked, or at War.
I love this site!!
In the ‘good old days’ the most successful thieves robbed banks, now they rob nations.
They learned that owning the bank was better.
After a while they, Graduated to robbing nations as the Globalists have been doing for a long time.
Cause they listened to Willy; you go where the $ is.
“when wages (blue line) are lower than inflation (red line) our income is shrinking,”
Transfer of wealth?
Yes, they call it ‘theft’.
We call it theft, they call it income.
FIFY
Exfiltration of wealth.
Redistribution. Corporate welfare. Too big to jail.
Take money from the productive, give it to useless eaters, like PharmaTV’s disinfotainers.
The lobbyists also buy the regulators and beaurcrats, .e.g. the Doctor of Death Anthony Faucci
Maybe this will bring some peace to Jimmy Carter’s heart to see that he wasn’t the worst President ever. That honor goes to a squinchy old Alzheimer’s patient who can’t even read a teleprompter properly.
Who is writing the bills ?
A : the people that own the magical money machine, the same ones that print the bills !
Elite globalists orders Bill/legislation.
Their corporations formulate/ constructs it.
Corporate lobbyists presents/delivers it to Congress.
Congress sells it, and passes it.
President signs it into law.
Contemporary Legislatures /Legislators have little to do with actually writing new laws.
I would add a sixth statement to your 5 flow chart points.
Main Street taxpayers pay for the legislation written to support the corporations.
K Street
Extrapolating further on the statement “Lobbyists are paid, some very well paid, to get politicians to go along with the need of the legislative group”…that’s the real dirt. It’s not like lobbyists are making intelligent arguments for support of their legislation, no, they use bribes, blackmail, sex…all means of leverage are on the table. The welfare of the citizenry, the security of our nation and our freedoms aren’t even a consideration to any of them anymore.
Stock tips..the legislation, thousands of pages in many cases, effects business making “winners and losers”, and the legislators spouse or son can make investments betting the winners are gonna win, AND that the losers are gonna lose, and rake in the dough.
THEY don’t have to READ the legislation, the helpful lobbyist can give them a “heads up”.
NYT, I believe it was, analysed the investments of Congress.
Amazingly, their investment record FAR exceeds the investment record of the best wall street investors, by a wide margin.
Legislators who are stupid as a bag of rocks, never the less demonstrate uncanny investment acumen.
“Pharma has a lot of lobbies. A lot of lobbyists, a lot of power.” – Donald J. Trump, Jan. 12 2017, Fox Business
-PT calls out lobbyists/donors in debate crowd
https://www.usatoday.com/videos/news/politics/2016/02/14/80367822/
Thing is- the parable of the burning feet:
If a man is screaming, you hear him and approach and he’s dancing in place, in furious pain, yelping and yelling at you, “my feet are on fire!! Good God, I’m burning!! OMG AHHHHH!!”
If you look down, and realize he is standing in a big bucket of burning coals you are quickly faced with a problem. You CAN yell at him, point down and tell him “LOOK DOWN, YOU’RE STANDING ON BURNING COALS, MAN!!!” but…
if he hasn’t been made aware of this already and is prone to merely panicking and self-pity… will it help?
More plainly- if he hasn’t noticed by THEN- do you really think he’s going to, EVER?
Sorry, I’ve run bars many years and it’s just a story I often use to describe an asinine mindset. And that mindset is ALL over the place now, from Covid (masks??? ha) to politics (“orange man bad, everyone KNOWS it”) to just sanity (REALLY people think an illegal alien is the same as an immigrant??).
That mindset will be immune to these very stunning graphs, SunD. They are likely very CAPABLE of understanding it- but they are IN-CAPABLE of wanting to. And thus, simple science like mathematics is too impossible to comprehend. :/
Awesome graphs, though. I literally called everyone I know who HASN’T been here at least once, yet, for this story.
But… yeah. Like I mentioned- I’m not holding my breath.
“Stupid is as stupid does.” Yogi Gump, 5th generation
Perhaps more pertinant to your comment;
“there is NO CURE for stupid!”
‘Yogi Gump, 5th generation’ – Love it!
(nods) Long was he wise- and he could run, too.
Vita videtur repetere se.
(Life seems to repeat itself. – Classical Latin)
Thanks for the Latin. I took it in high school. They condensed 4 years into 3 years of study.
Advice to Joe Biden with the “problem” he has.
Semper ubi sub ubi.
Joe Biden is, and has always been, oblivious to everything … he’s a petty, small town, glad-handing, good old boy from a small state with delusions of grandeur with his main objective to make sure he feathers his nest no matter what.
yup he is the perfect flunky.he does what he is told and the puppeteers just sit back and laugh as he doesn’t have a clue.i’m waiting for the day they put up “i’m a doofus” on his teleprompter and he reads it!
Bonus: His handlers hate him!
Actually, for many, many years (and so before any dementia manifested) he has been something of a medical miracle.
Dr.’s are stumped to explain how is even alive, let alone doing things like walking, considering he has BOTH Congenital Bilateral Hoof in mouth disease,…AND Congenital Ass up Rectum disease.
HOW in the world can he BREATHE? EAT? WALK?
Its a mystery,…
Marxist Marionettes.
Pull the strings, they talk…and dance!
Great one-line description of Biden that captures his finest qualities!
Great read and analysis. The analysis fits perfectly with a story I read yesterday:
“Pfizer, Big Pharma Ramp Up Lobbying to Sink Law Aimed at Protecting Whistleblowers”
Pfizer and other pharmaceutical industry players are stepping up lobbying efforts in hope of defeating the False Claims Amendments Act of 2021, a bill that would strengthen protection for whistleblowers.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/pfizer-big-pharma-lobbying-law-protecting-whistleblowers/
cross posted at https://freedomaustralia.freeforums.net/thread/1741/maganomics-swampnomics
I concluded some years ago that the root cause of the “big government” problem is the federal income tax that permitted the leviathan to emerge.
The Wilson admin around 1915-1917, income tax, creation of Federal reserve, 17th amendment changing Senator selection from State legislatures to popular vote, league of Nations (which, although it failed was precursor to U.N.) and was also (coincidence?) when the russian revolution deposed the Czar.
The timing of the simultaneous sharp spike in wages and sharp dip in inflation is interesting, to me. April 2020. Did the sudden shutdowns of everywhere have anything to do with this?
Also interesting that the very beginning of the Biden administration marks the rise of inflation and the drop of wages. Did employers immediately start paying less when Biden was installed?
Excellent! And, the mass formation created by conspiring legacy media, 3 letter agencies purportedly acting in the US public’s interests ginning up the fear and anxiety, the censorship of dissenting viewpoints, the threats to doctors who do not obey the narrative are leading us to a totalitarian state. Ghent University Professor Mattias Desmet has an excellent analysis of this concept -mass formation- leading to totalitarianism and suggests we continue to publicly dissent and to form a “parallel society” as described by Vaclav Havel. See jeffreydachmd.com for interview on The Pandemic Podcast.
Catherine Austin Pitts also has some interesting thoughts on a parallel society, too. See the Solari Report.solari.com
An ex-Congressman once told me, “Bob, the REAL money in Washington is CASH!” Untraceable and benefitting all!
I hope you are an adjunct professor teaching this at Hillsdale or some other conservative university.
So well written and understandable. I wish I could get more people to read it.
So, what can we do to stop it?
Trump had 2 years of support and 2 years of absolute chaos caused by Pelosi.
And yet, the extreme differences in economics and safety/well being contrast to Obama and Biden has never illustrated better the differences policy/leadership make.
everything’s bigger in TX.
https://www.dallasnews.com/business/economy/2021/12/10/inflation-in-dallas-is-even-higher-than-the-us/
In D-FW over the past 12 months, gasoline prices were up 70.2%, used car and truck prices were up 31%, energy prices were up 40.9% and transportation prices were up 23.9%.
If measured by the 1970’s cpi index, we’re looking like a y/y annualized rate of 15%! That is going to be devastating.
Seems pretty hopeless at this point. I’ve lost any illusions that election fraud 2020 will be rectified or that anyone is working on our behalf to save the Republic.
America 1776-2020 RIP
Fixing the described problem may require a reformation of government and its relationship with industry, especially global business.
Sundance, the video at the link “the global order of things,” 2nd paragraph in Point 2 above, has been taken down by YouTube. Is this video available anywhere else?