During the Texas presidential electors legislative session there was a debate over an amendment to wording where the Texas House would rebuke the Supreme Court of the United States for “moral cowardice” in not allowing the Texas challenge to be heard.
During the amendment debate Texas Congressman Matt Patrick (CD-32) put into the ¹record a report from a claimed “Supreme Court staffer” about an internal debate taking place within the high court where justices were arguing the reasons for not allowing the Texas election challenge to take place. As outlined by Patrick Chief Justice Roberts was worried about riots in the streets if the court heard the Texas arguments and evidence.
The exact statement comes at 01:32:31 of the debate video [prompted just hit play]
.
¹To be fair – It should be noted the claim comes with no specific citation for further review or analysis; and considering the heightened sense of concern over the election, more details should be requested before making assumptions about the described incident.
Refuse to hear the election cases by USSC is enough evidence.
Trump was impeached on anonymous hearsay so why shouldn’t Roberts and the other Supreme Court justices be impeached for the very same thing?
While I’m of the opinion that the report is not true, still, I’d love to see that guy get a taste of “justice” as presented before him in that preposterous impeachment trial.
My Brothers and I had these conversations way before the lawsuits were filed, why???
Because “WE DON’T BURN S**T DOWN!
Exactly right. And, if we did they would fear us and then listen to us. At least some mass civil disobedience.
There are many ways to practice civil disobedience w/out violence and destruction.
Maybe we should.
The left has run roughshod over the law, over decency and reason, and gravely over the rights of their fellow citizens.
Their motto IS “By any means necessary.”
What effective counter/ defense do you believe is appropriate? And will it save and preserve our Constitutional Republic?
The minute we saw no coverage of Joe Biden’s involvement with his son we should have parked our asses in the halls of the networks until they had to haul us out with police.
Fact it, the minute the Russia Russia stuff kept coming out of Schiff’s mouth, we should have picketed his house, his office, prevented him from speaking, etc.
The Supreme Cowards of the United States, led by Chief Jester John Roberts.
joenucles – love that descriptor of the Supreme Court – I will begin using it immediately. However, they are not only cowards (that MIGHT be forgivable by some people – not me however), they are corrupt traitors to the country as well.
I don’t know if it is ever possible to change the name of the Supreme Court but if it were possible, I would change the name of the “Supreme Court of the United States” to the “High Court of the United States” as punishment for all their ridiculous rulings over the decades.
“Chief Justice Roberts was worried about riots in the streets if the court heard the Texas arguments and evidence.”
Perhaps the 100 million conservatives that were disenfranchised by the voter fraud program of the dims/communists should consider “riots in the streets” if the court doesn’t hear the suits filed by the President, the States, and other Citizens.
Oh, joy!
MORE Q crap!
Perhaps it is Q crap, I don’t know. It sure is funny as hell though.
And probably not far from the truth!
i think its the REPORTER
John Roberts from Faux News perhaps???
its the Call log. Dont use Q to hide crimes.
troll
Curious, has anyone ever asked the Chief Justice ? Seems like a good way to clear it up.
I know the FOX John Roberts made sure everyone knew it wasn’t him.
One does not visit that island for the sand and water. Ask the lawyer from Hardvard.
That has never been shared by Q. What’s more it’s either factual or it’s not. It appears to have come through the gateway pundit. One person referred to this as call logs. This appears to be flight logs.
More ‘look … over there.. a squirrel’ gambits. Yer getting predictable Gerry. Save us all a headache and provide your approved list of sources and news. TIA. Have a great day!
Actually it’s a copy of the actual flight log from one of Epstein’s planes. The question is whether it is the real John Roberts or not.
John Roberts is a pretty common name. Unfortunately Chief Justice Roberts acts so compromised that it is believable that it could be him.
To be fair you need to mention in the row the departure airport (PBI) and arrival airport (TEB)
PBI = Palm Beach International, FL Airport
TEB = Teterboro, NJ Airport
This leg according to the log IMO didn’t go to the island.
>This leg according to the log IMO didn’t go to the island.
Honest question, so what does this show? Was that Epstien’s plane and did CJ Roberts ride on it? If so, why? Where it went is irrelevant.
the plane is the BLOW JOB
Yes. It’s just that things were known to happen on those flights… some “mile high” flights.
Lin Wood
@LLinWood
I have long had questions about “the John Roberts” on Jeffrey Epstein private jet flight logs. I suspected it was our Chief Justice. MSM has shown no interest in investigating issue to find TRUTH. America is now entitled to know the answer. Every lie will be revealed. Pray.
11:34 AM · Dec 17, 2020
offer flight from miami to atlanta…
drug the person… wake them up in bed naked with underage boy/girl – photo it..
spend the last part of the flight explaining to them how this works, and what they will do to keep this quiet.
Drop them off. OWN ANOTHER
OffCourseNation – that image is from a pilot’s log book and the flight is from Palm Beach FL to Teterboro NJ. The airplane is a Gulfstream G-1159 owned by TWA INTERNATIONAL INC of Cheyenne WY. That is not a passenger manifest for the flight.
zabasearch.com indicates that there are (at least) 92 people in the U.S. named John Roberts.
I’ll see your John Roberts on the Lolita Express flight manifest …
… and raise you one Michael Cohen passport showing no stop in Prague
Detest Roberts but this is hearsay.
Exactly. Good thing the last paragraph noted…to be fair states it. Still people will over react.
Lets give it standing and let the Judge state his actual merits.
Hearsay by “anynonmous officials familiar with Trump’s thinking” was blasted by media organizations like CNN, Fox News, and MSNBC for the past 4 years.
D’accord redlion!
Of course, if it were in a ‘dossier’, it would be totally believable!1
Yeah, just ask Perkins Coie. They are the masters of fake Russian Dossiers, Joe Biden’s lawyers, and Bejing’s favorite law firm.
Like Col. Vindman?
Wait a minute… I thought the weight of the evidence didn’t matter, rather the seriousness of the charge.
Well, per Sydney Powell, her law suites was docked and asked States to reply by Jan 14, 2021. Sure, very useful. NOT
But….where there is smoke, there is fire….I’ve been reading this for several days on several different sites….it isn’t going away.
But mostly, what does this have to do with the SCOTUS refusing to hear- even so much as the evidence, the case brought by Texas and 18 states concerning voter fraud?
Let’s don’t devolve into Jerry Springer, mmkay? Not right now.
Ok, let the cowards know that, if they don’t take the case up and allow all evidence to be presented, there will be massive riots that will dwarf the BLM riots. I don’t advocate violence, but that is exactly what burying the evidence of election fraud will lead to.
Riot has a constitutional quality of its own. USSC confirms it. We are on our own now. No more “Trust The Plan”
isnt it ironic – how the supreme court just told us how the law works???
if we just appear we can do a lot of VIOLENCE…. SICK LOSERS
I remember my “freedom fighter” friend who was resisted “Commie regime”, gave me advise. “if you want to beat the commies, you have to be crueler than they are. You must be their nightmare”
Quite a difference between “massive riots” and “Civil War 2.0.”
Quite indeed!
We had massive riots most of the summer
I can tell you that if we slide into more liberal rioting, raping and pillaging, the patriots will not stand by this time. None of will ever go looking for it but if they come after us again it will not go as it did last time.
I agree …I felt MANY patriots held back previously because our VSGPDJT would get blamed. That issue is no more.
Absolutely. What the h— do we care what is burned to the ground in blue cities? We could burn them down faster and easier than the PantyFa pukes. We could bring millions of loaded firearms into the cities and mow down every leftwing radical who resists and disagrees with us. We could mob the corrupt municipal officials’ homes and eliminate anyone and everyone within them.
But I doubt (hope?) we have a sufficient lack of morals to do any of that. So we are essentially admitting surrender to the Bully Ruling Class in advance.
So now does my post worry you or make you think a bit ? Am I serious? Is GB on the fringe…? (fear not)
Well, SCOTUS justices – and a lot of other highly placed officials in this country – apparently have concluded that we Deplorables are NOT a threat…that we are NOT going to fight back violently against the traitors to America who willfully committed massive fraud and are going to destroy this nation as founded and maintained for 250 years. We are the same as the Jews in 1930s Germany…..sheep. I guess they have a lot of evidence that supports their conclusion, judging by the number of people still wearing masks.
Off soapbox.
That report could be true or a fabrication. Either way it provides a good explanation for the SCOTUS decision. True character is being revealed by many people. It is all working as planned. MAGA!
Well DD, it is as good an excuse as the one the USSC gave us, ‘no standing’ an argument between states in the Union. Who else would settle such disputes? Sad for us all.
Yes BK it is sad, If true it also reveals a significant problem with SCOTUS. Consideration of potential social unrest is not part of their remit. This is NOT THEIR JOB. If anyone tries to do the job of another while doing their own they will fall short in their own responsibilities and actually interfere in the responsibilities of others. In this case, if true, they did not do their job at all. And, they ignored their oath of office. At least in 7 cases.
I’m sure he believes this but I’m not sure he would actually admit it.. He would just rule accordingly which is what he did
Until proven otherwise at this point I have no real confidence in the Supreme Court. IMO, except for a couple, they are just another group of ass-holes who can screw-up America.
Yep, you can count on Thomas and Alito to do the right thing. When those to vote different than what I think is right…I start reevaluating my reasoning on the subject.
How do you get a Supreme Court Justice under oath?
You get yourself an ACME patented waterboard, and…
They take an oath when sworn in. They are under that oath until they leave office.
It was reported here. https://halturnerradioshow.com/index.php/en/news-page/news-nation/loud-arguments-in-us-supreme-court-chambers-over-texas-lawsuit-court-intimidated
I don’t think it is believable. One might hear loud muffled voices, but to be able to hear the detail of a conversation like that through closed doors and down the hall is suspect. And if they were arguing that vehemently, the idea that Roberts and Kavenaugh were leaving with smiles is also suspect.
In fairness to President Trump, he was impeached based on two guys drinking booze in a crowded restaurant and one of them claimed to overhear a cell phone conversation by the other person.
We literally impeached a President over less substantive information.
Right, seems like we should at least have investigations started, NSA databases searched, subponeas issued, pre-dawn raids conducted, depositions taken…
Someone posted a transcript of that scif discussion here at CTH in the last couple of days. I don’t know which is correct but I believe the Texas congressman is attempting to interpret what HE heard which is not the same as the transcript posted by a CTH treeper . Nobody really knows which is right but I think individuals could interpret the discussion to align with their particular narrative so perhaps we should take it with a grain of salt?
The supreme court didn’t want to hear it……PERIOD.
Seven didn’t want to hear it. Thomas and Alito wanted to hear the case.
Hal Turner is unreliable.
Agree. Last week, Turner reported that US military was battling Chinese troops at the US-Canadian border, when reports circulated that Chinese troops were in Canada at the invitation of Trudope. Hal used photos from October of a train moving old surplus Army tanks out of Maine but Hal said the photos were evidence of the military moving equipment up towards the battle front. Ridiculous.
When an original jurisdiction case is filed by a state, and the SCOTUS declines to even hear the case, something is up.
It was a corrupt Supreme Court in 1922 to 1923 that came up with the garbage legal doctrine of standing, not the Founding Fathers.
Massachusetts v. Mellon, 262 U.S. 447 (1923), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court rejected the concept of taxpayer standing.
The case was consolidated with Frothingham v. Mellon.
The plaintiffs in the cases, Frothingham and Massachusetts, sought to prevent certain federal government expenditures which they considered to violate the Tenth Amendment.
The court rejected the suits on the basis that neither plaintiff suffered particularized harm, writing:
“We have no power per se to review and annul acts of Congress on the ground that they are unconstitutional. The question may be considered only when the justification for some direct injury suffered or threatened, presenting a justiciable issue, is made to rest upon such an act. … The party who invokes the power must be able to show not only that the statute is invalid but that he has sustained or is immediately in danger of sustaining some direct injury as the result of its enforcement, and not merely that he suffers in some indefinite way in common with people generally.”
This case is considered the beginning of the doctrine of standing.
Prior to it the doctrine was that all persons had a right to pursue a private prosecution of a public right.
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massachusetts_v._Mellon
I am just repeating what I heard at County Party headquarters on Monday….It was duly noted that our chair was rather disappointed with the SCOTUS action but she stated it was Paxton’s fault it was kicked out due TO A TECHNICALITY that should have been obvious to Paxton. IOW, it’s something that he should have known. Then it was mentioned Ted Cruz was going to re file it but no one knew anything about it. I have to ad, our chair knows Paxton personally and she says he is a fine person, a very good man. Just an FYI from this corner of my state.
Mitch McConnell approved those three newest justices, and President Trump had little choice but to go with the alleged “conservative and constitutionally strict” judges based on advice from many directions.
The moral cowardice exhibited by those three justices plus Roberts is precisely the linguini-spined character on display in Mitch McConnell and almost all Senate Republicans since they’ve all been in office.
Wouldn’t surprise me a bit!
Without evidence, let’s not get sucked down this rabbit hole. It’s a perfect issue for the left to use on us to run out the clock and create a side controversy that distracts from the election fraud issue.
Like they won’t do that anyway, Right! All issues, are perfect issues for them.
We no longer need to continue to be worried about what the left thinks or does. We are the majority. We need to act like it and take the lead and stop cowering to the left. JMO
LETS GET SUCKED INTO THE RABBIT HOLE. and force them to address EVERY COMMENT.
they answer to us. …
the benefit of the doubt IS OVER.
it will take them 2 seconds to issue a statement AND SAY THATS NOT TRUE.
I agree 100%… if it’s a lie, let him get pissed and start to answer the questions… If it’s *true*, well then let him squirm as he tries to answer… just sayin
What I’m saying is don’t win the battle to lose the war. I fully agree it’s fair game. But there are 20 days until Jan 6th. If this chews up the news hours, no one will see the fraud bombshells the Trump team dumps on the public. That’s the fight that matters right now. Perhaps he gets rolled up anyway when Trump drops the moabs. Come Jan 7th after PT wins his second term, then we can focus on this. Until then, all hands on deck. IMO
Ok I just read about SCOTUS delaying Powell’s case until after 6 Jan. Argh! At this point, I don’t know what is best in terms of tactics involving motivating SCOTUS. All I know is if Trump doesn’t win, it’s not going to matter. If Trump wins, the SHTF with them and Roberts is probably toast In the meantime, whatever it takes to get Trump his second term.
⅙https://parler.com/post/d85a91e1960643318bc60101a25b7ccd
According to The Clover Chronicle, Judge Roberts was being blackmailed even before he was nominated to SCOTUS.
does any website allow parler post to show?
Cut and paste the above URL but remove the 1/6 at the front. Got me there.
I can believe it. Roberts was told by his best buds they would provoke civil unrest. However, there are not that damn many of them. Joe D-mentia does NOT have a big, loyal base, unlike President Trump who has over 100 MILLION loyal followers.
This is pushing the only course of action which is Insurrection and a military tribunal; the 2020 election CANNOT be allowed to be stolen, otherwise there will NEVER be an honest election again in this country. The entire system in DC is corrupt from years of rot being allowed to remain. JMHO
“This is pushing the only course of action which is Insurrection and a military tribunal”
And if this story is true, and the above happens, first order of business is, replace all the SC judges!
You only need a couple of hundred people to set fires and loot when a million people stand by and let them.
If true would anyone be surprised.
Here is more:
I think many are today learning why SCOTUS is rejecting petitions seeking FAIR review. Roberts & Breyer are “anti-Trumpers” They should resign immediately. CJ Roberts has other reasons to resign. He is a disgrace to office & to country.
@SidneyPowell1
@realDonaldTrump
The #SupremeCourt electronic filing system shows our EMERGENCY Petitions docketed for #Georgia & #Michigan but SLOW-walking w/ state response not due until JAN 14!
Today it FINALLY submitted our #Arizona & #Wisconsin EMERGENCY petitions filed Friday INEXPLICABLY rejected them
They were submitted electronically Saturday morning and all copies hand-delivered and fees paid.
#SupremeCourt clerk refused to give reason and will not return phone calls!!
What is going on??
Unprecedented lack of professionalism
@realDonaldTrump
@GenFlynn
@POTUS
@Scavino45
https://twitter.com/llinwood/status/1339674878996148224?s=21
Gotta love Lin. The only one who isn’t afraid to say what others only skirt around it.
That isn’t going to win anything. Biden get is and appoints a far left loon for CJ.
If you’re going to destroy Roberts, make sure you have Trump or a GOP POTUS.
No surprise here. The court is delaying so that by the time the states respond they’re hoping to be able to rule that the case is moot, with the electoral votes having been counted by Congress on Jan 6.
A detail most aren’t familiar with … the Court is historically very political; it is very much aware of the current issues of the day and tries to avoid controversy. This includes its most famous Chief Justice, John Marshall, who worked hard on consensus rulings.
Sad to say, in the current environment, the best we can hope for rests with Congress when they meet to certify the results of the Electoral College vote.
In the meantime, we can only pray for PDJT and his ability to pull a rabbit out of the hat and cheer the nation to its core.
I don’t think that’s his problem, is it?
Sorry, I need more proof before believing this
Obamacare is the only proof one needs.
And DACA
His ruling on DACA was crazy. Obama did it on executive order yet Trump was prevented from overturning it on executive order! In addition the original order by Obama was obviously unconstitutional. Another unfathomable decision by Roberts!
NO YOU DONT NEED MORE PRRRRROOOOOOOOOOOOOOf.
You need them to address it. Why are you constantly having to do all the work, when it takes them a few seconds to address it?
why cant we use the same tactic of the deep state? – they issue a shtty report and make POTUS respond.!
This is the correct tactics and strategy. If the life long conservatives don’t have the guts for it it wil fall to the liberal converts who know how their former comrades play the field..
Deep state coup chief jester John Roberts is coward’s,
John Roberts is nothing But unjust’s,
The constitution of 1787 does not give the Supreme Court the role of “our final arbitrator, our final line of defense for right and wrong.” That role is given to us, the citizenry, and secondarily to our elected representatives. The constitution gives the state legislatures the duty to select electors for the electoral college. In a situation where an election is obviously fraudulent, the burden is on them to vote in a slate of electors who will vote for the candidate who really won. In this case, it is clear beyond a preponderance, beyond a reasonable doubt, to a moral certainty that Donald Trump won in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, and it was therefore the duty of the state legislators in those states to select electors who would vote for Trump and only for Trump.
This is a reasonable enough argument. But in this case, time is short and the corruption is massive. If Biden takes office a great wrong will be done to the nation. SCOTUS could easily have taken the case, exposing the evidence to the public, and made a just ruling.
In other words, our SCOTUS believes that we deplorables (half of the country) will just bend over and take it without a whimper but the big bad BLM will riot.
Sad thing is…..I’m beginning to think they’re probably right.
NO! They are NOT right.
THIS IS THE HILL I DIE ON!
I will NOT live on my knees as a b!tch to the Deep State and the CHICOMM. I will die on my feet defending MY President, MY Country, MY Constitution, and MY GOD-GIVEN Rights.
Freedom is NOT a spectator sport.
What you decide to do is up to you.
Amen!
Is that you standing in front of the Capital building with the rifle?
Yep. Lots of talk, tweeting, facebooking, blogging but the streets are still empty.
Yep….. IF an easy bluff has SCOTUS cringing and it backs down because of threats on the streets by soy boy Antifa….. it’s all over.
Another system is needed.
If it is true that SC has fear of rioting… “They ain’t seen nothin’ yet! Deplorables will unite into something that has never been witnessed in the last 50-100 years. SC will regret the day they refused to hear the people’s cases. This is OUR country; we call the shots, you bunch of useless jackals!
That “staffer” transcript premiered here on CTH 3-4 days ago. It was posted by a guy named “John”, I seem to recall. Every treeper that responded kinda went “yeah, sure lol”. I still don’t know what to believe.
Numerous posters here recognized this alleged “report” as exactly what it was, fake news!
Agreed. (I forgot to add that this treeper called “John” actually claimed to BE the staffer).
wheree else do you think people post the truth trying ot get it out?
name another more reliable place to POST than here?
I remember that the post linked this website ~ https://voxday.blogspot.com/2020/12/the-end-of-democracy.html
From a “report found online” written by a SCOTUS staffer? Where is it?
who CARES – force SCOTUS to respond! they do this all the time to POTUS … some fake report says BLAH BLAH and POTUS has to respond…
There is a reason Roberts and even WH counsel (yesterday) are being called out. Sunlight is very effective. I do find it funny though.. Roberts is more afraid of ChiRiots than he is from PatRiots. If this all goes downhill fast.. I hope you all understand now how effective fear will be. When we use it against them all.
Remember when a sitting President’s IMPEACHMENT was initiated by an anonymous whistleblower??
Why not impeach Roberts, et al, on the same basis ??
Turnabout is fair play, and in this case, well deserved.
You have to have a House that is willing to to it. Right now, we don’t have a House that would even put it on the docket.
Not unless the CJ was consistently ruling against them, which Roberts is not. Quite the opposite; he consistently rules in their favor.
On the trail
https://www.charismanews.com/us/83683-washington-insider-reports-shouting-conflict-in-supreme-court-over-refusal-to-hear-texas-lawsuit
https://halturnerradioshow.com/index.php/en/news-page/news-nation/loud-arguments-in-us-supreme-court-chambers-over-texas-lawsuit-court-intimidated
Just saw Rand Paul on Cavuto. He said Biden will be the president on Jan 20th.
Rand Paul. Not the Turtle. Not Mitt Romney.
If you’re still hoping for Congress to put Trump back in office on January 6th when it is time to count the electors, I want what you’re smoking.
Libertarian chicken-poo. Wants to keep his committee assignments. I read Tommy Tuberville is onboard to join Mo.
You would think Rand Paul would finally see how evil the left is after his next-door Democrat neighbor beat him up but he still remains a coward.
Well I hope you just got off the phone to his office to voice your opinion,as I have.
There are a couple of other Senator’s that may step up. It only takes one.
I’m smoking this….Congressional Research Service article, 12.8.2020, entitled: Counting Electoral Votes: An Overview of Procedures at the Joint Session, Including Objections by Members of Congress”, excerpt below:
FTA: Basis for Objections
The general grounds for an objection to the counting of an electoral vote or votes would appear from the federal statute and from historical sources to be that such vote was not “regularly given” by an elector, and/or that the elector was not “lawfully certified” according to state statutory procedures. The statutory provision first provides in the negative that “no electoral vote … regularly given by electors whose appointment has been lawfully certified … from which but one return has been received shall be rejected” (3 U.S.C. §15). The provision then reiterates for clarity22 that both houses concurrently may reject a vote when not “so regularly given” by electors “so certified” (3 U.S.C. §15). It should be noted that the word lawfully was expressly inserted by the House in the Senate legislation (S. 9, 49th Congress) before the word certified. 23 Such addition arguably provides an indication that Congress thought it might, as grounds for an objection, question and look into the lawfulness of the certification under state law.
The objection that votes were not “regularly given” may, in practice, subsume the objection that the elector was not “lawfully certified,” because a vote given by one not “lawfully certified” may arguably be other than “regularly given.” Nevertheless, the two objections are not necessarily the same. In the case of the “faithless elector” in 1969, described above, the elector was apparently “lawfully certified” by the state, but the objection raised was that the vote was not “regularly given” by such elector. In the above-described 2005 case, the objection was also based on the grounds that the electoral votes “were not, under all of the known circumstances, regularly given.”
Receipt of Two Certificates from the Same State
Influenced by its historical experience prior to 1887, Congress was particularly concerned in the statute of 1887 with the case of two lists of electors and votes being presented to Congress from the same state. Three different contingencies appear to be provided for in the statute for two lists being presented. In the first instance, two lists would be proffered, but the assumption presented in the law is that only one list would be from electors who were determined to be appointed pursuant to the state election contest statute (as provided for in 3 U.S.C. §5), and that in such case, only those electors should be counted. In the second case, when two lists were proffered as being from two different state authorities who arguably made determinations provided for under 3 U.S.C. §5 (a state statutory election contest determined at least six days prior to December 14, the winner of the state presidential election), the question of which state authority is “the lawful tribunal of such State” to make the decision (and thus the acceptance of those electors’ votes) shall be decided only upon the concurrent agreement of both houses “supported by the decision of such State so authorized by its law.” In the third instance, if there is no determination by a state authority of the question of which slate was lawfully appointed, then the two chambers must agree concurrently to accept the votes of one set of electors; but the two chambers may also concurrently agree not to accept the votes of electors from that state.
https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL32717.pdf
Something I thought I would never read on here- “I just watched Cavuto”?
My opinion of Rand Paul is – Trey Gowdy with curly hair.
All hat, no cattle.
Sounds as though Mitch’s admonition to the R members of the U.S. Senate hit a nerve.
Someone on another thread talked about Rand Paul talking a good game; then caving to his own cowardice. Recognizing that Senator Paul has been attacked in his own neighborhood, seriously injured by the attacker, then harassed and threatened by demonstrators as he and Mrs. returned to their hotel on July 4, I understand his trepidation, but this situation is much bigger than any one man’s fear and trepidation. Heroes are men and women who do the right thing in the face of their own fears.
Caving to the demands, when one knows the truth to be otherwise, is the hallmark of a coward. Never again will I take Senator Rand Paul seriously – more a loss for me, than for him, I imagine.
So many feet of clay in the GOP – I can’t count that high.
OK. Margin limits are fixed, but still must remember to extra space to create paragraph breaks. Learning…
We are making good progress with this new system. No one could have done it faster or better than our CTH team.
Rand Paul said yesterday there was widespread fraud. That he said Biden will be POTUS is what i think too. Most of you think it too. Why? Because time is short, we—you and I—haven’t done anything to stop this. I’ve written a couple of dozen emails, nothing more. What about you?
Been successful in changing minds?
Unlike some of you, I don’t think our POTUS has an ace in the hole. He would have played it long ago if he had one.
I know almost everyone here respects our host, Sundance. He has been waging war against those who tried too shut him down, but I haven’t seen Sundance proffer hopes for a second Trump term, have you? All he wrote is that it remained to be seen what was going to happen, a few weeks ago.
Unless he gets Covid and carks it
Then its Kameltoe the Hoe
Journalist who traveled with Joe Biden to Georgia tests positive for Covid-19 after ex-VP blamed own cough on ‘bit of a cold’
https://www.rt.com/usa/509900-reporter-biden-pool-coronavirus/
Leftist rules are in effect, guilty until proven innocent. Roberts is guilty.
He is worthless as a judge if he acted like that.
Possible, yes.
More likely, however, is a concern to keep the Court “above politics.” That’s not a rational or acceptable position given the politically radical justices currently serving on the Court, who do not care about keeping the Court above politics, or the existential danger to the nation this scale of systemic voter fraud represents, but I have little trouble believing that this is Robert’s position. It is one he’s expressed in the past, if I remember correctly, regarding the Court’s reputation after Bush vs. Gore.
I do not agree with this position. Should the Court should be above politics? Yes. However it is not playing politics to ensure the electoral process is not corrupted to the point of irrelevancy.
And by the way Mr. Roberts, the radical left has been rioting in the streets since May.
WE ARE ADDRESSING to political PARTIES! there is no way to keep it out of politics.
Supreme court does its job OR AFTER THE LEGISLATORS DO IT – we FIRE THE ENTIRE SUPREME COURT.
Well, according to a tweet by Lin Woods, Roberts said in a phone conversation with Justice Breyer in August 2019 that he would make sure “the mother f#*ker would never be re-elected.”
WTH is wrong with people like that traitor? Are they stupid? Can they not see what President Trump has done for this country? SPIT!
Roberts is merely a tool of the Globalist Elites & Deep State. The globalists see EXACTLY what President Trump has done for this country and they abhor it.
President Trump / MAGA severely violates their plans. They want the wealth of this nation for THEMSELVES. They do NOT want Deplorables / working class & middle class soaking up any significant percentage of the nation’s wealth by earning it.
The Globalist Elites do NOT want Americans building an economy for themselves independent of and thus depriving those globalists of FULL control and of ALL the profits.
Are we going to surrender America to them?
One thing for sure, shouting did not give Chief Justice more persuasive power over the three new justices. They signed on with the majority on their own volition.
I agree.. I am thoroughly disgusted with them
John Roberts has been obviously compromised for a long time. So much so that his opinions are nonsensical. There, I said it.
That Breyer and Roberts are anti Trump is also no surprise. Traitors to boot? Roberts definitely, imo, Breyer who cares? Here’s the thing, The SC should have taken that case or given it merit somehow. Machines picked the winner, not the people. That’s a problem.
But did Roberts really say he was worried about riots? Yikes. That’s weird and cowardly. Riots? WTH does he care? He’s in an ivory tower and will deliver for Deep State at the end of the day. Apparently so will the other justices, except for Thomas and Alito. Something is smellier than usual at the SC.
Even if CJ was worried about Antifa riots (and unworried about insurrection if SCOTUS did not hear the Texas case?) the five relatively conservative justices could not have attached weight to such a concern. Why didn’t Alito, Thomas, Kavanaugh, Gorsuch and Barrett vote to hear the Texas case? Probably because they didn’t want the SCOTUS docket filled with such original claims every four years.
According to the Consistion, it is the job of the Supreme Court to hear state versus state disputes.
The Founding Fathers literally created the Supreme Court for this very purpose.
On the other hand, the lower courts in the Founding Father days were later created by Congress and do no resemble anything like today’s lower courts.
Back then, judges were forced to travel by horseback throughout the country for a majority of the year to hear cases and if you could not handle a job with so much traveling, then you just quit or resign.
Does anyone doubt this happened?
Yes, I have doubts. Justices are careful with their words and the security of those words.
Lin Wood says he has recordings of Roberts and Breyer saying Trump would never be elected
The Supreme Court of the U.S. has been corrupted and is now officially weaponized against the will of the people in our nation.
How the hell do we remedy that? Whether it’s because judges at every level are compromised or their families threatened, we pay the price with the loss of our liberties.
Here in NJ, earlier this year a judge’s college-age son was murdered. I can’t help but wonder how many judges now receive threats using that case as an example.
I don’t doubt for a second that they factored in the KNOWN FACT that Democrats would unleash Antifa/BLM.
The difference this time being that Team Red would not sit this one out.
The fact that they didn’t hear oral arguments validates the assertion made by many that the Supreme Court is uninterested in disrupting the status quo. The reason, whether it’s threats of violence, threats on their families, extortion, Party Loyalty, etc is really irrelevant.
The Supreme Court didn’t declare that Texas had no standing. By refusing to hear the case the Supreme Court has no standing. It can now be ignored.
In fact, if President Trump were to take decisive action against the coup, and the Court tried to intervene, his one and only statement should be “The Supreme Court has no standing in National Security matters.”
Duh.
Anyone with an IQ above room temperature knew they were going to chicken out for this very reason. It’s why the right needs to start fighting fire with fire and acting the same way instead of trying to take the high road. People have to FEAR you in order to do what you want them to do orin this case, the moral and correct thing that’s best for the country. If they knew that conservatives would/will riot like mad once this bogus election result stands, they’d step in and look to make it right.
The SC fears the crazy leftists and thus will make decisions to try and limit what they may do if they don’t get their way. They do not feel people on the right that will just complain online about something and reluctantly move on with their lives.
i CALL BS!
they dont think 74 million arent going to SNAP one day? FLIP OUT one day? SCREAM and say I HAVE HAD ENOUGH one day? and that day is ONLY not here because POTUS hasnt said so. WE respect him and our journey together to this moment.
I guess embryos present not threat to the the Supreme Court, yet they back down from the possibility of leftist rioters. Real tough. Stand up to those evil unborn children and destroy them in the womb.
Thats a pretty big deal to have read into the record without some whistleblower protection.
Exactly.
There is something to this
As much as I would like to believe that this incident actually took place in the hallowed conference rooms of the SCOTUS, it does not pass my sniff-test. I think that they were simply co-conspirators in a top-to-bottom effort to restore the primacy of “The Swamp.”
IMO, the timing of this is great and gives me hope that Trump will act. Lin and Sidney are publicly discrediting the Supreme Court (backed w/real proof) and showing the masses that even the Justice System is corrupt to the core. This gives Trump a legitimate way to ignore them and their politically-biased decisions. It allows him to go “Lincoln Redeux” in order to restore order and accountability since, obviously, there is no verifiable institution left, short-term, to let truth prevail and the Constitution reign supreme. President Trump, we have your back on suspension of Habeas Corpus or Martial Law because, now, we all see it must be done.
It’s Time To Sign This Petition.. I Did.. We The People of the United States Request President Trump Invoke Insurrection Act to Take Back Our Republic w/Military | We the People: Your Voice in Our Government
I RARELY sign petitions….they RARELY change anything….and they give the enemy all of your personal contact info….nope.
I respect your opinion and your choice, but that’s exactly what is wrong in this country right now. Too many people are apathetic and we won’t stand up for what’s right and fair.
So we’re down to no evidence craziness by this Patrick, Lin Wood and others because we’re not up for the true fight.
Who are you to call Lin Woods and Dinesh D’Souza crazies. One is actually on the front line. Your are the one that is crazy. So what’s your big plan. Yeah, you do not have one, you are just here to demoralize.
Trying to keep up….Lin Woods suit is in the SC.
This is what I have been saying, the Texas case was the true winner. The SC had just a month before ruled that only state legislatures can make election law. Just think of all the states that changed election laws while bypassing the legislation process. Even Texas did it. Thre were millions upon millions of votes cast in multiple states, even Texas, that would have to be voided if the SC did the right thing and followed the US Constitution.
There is no fraud to prove, fraud is a separate issue, the proof is as plain as day here. It’s cut and dried, crystal clear that these sate election laws.rules were unconstitutional and should never been allowed. The Texas GOP sued Governor Abbot when he extended early voting, knowing he was not allowed to do so. But, the Texas Supreme Court ignored the US Constitution and ruled in Abbot’s favor. All those early voted must be, by law, rendered null and void.
This is why I keep saying this case needs to keep being pressed. As Sidney Powell said “Well, if Texas doesn’t have standing somebody does”. I say this is where we plant our flag. This is the hill we die on. Either we have a Constitution that time and time again has been ruled as the supreme law of the land, or we are no longer a nation. It can’t be both.
Supposedly the entire “report.” The last paragraph makes me doubt it’s authenticity.
DECEMBER 13, 2020
The end of democracy
https://voxday.blogspot.com/2020/12/the-end-of-democracy.html
I make no claims about the accuracy of this report, which is supposedly a leak from a clerk for one of the Supreme Court justices:
I am a clerk for one of the Justices on SCOTUS. Today was like nothing we have ever seen. The justices are arguing loudly behind closed doors.
The Justices met in a closed and sealed room, as is standard.
Usually it is very calm, however today we could hear screaming all the way down the hall.
They met in person, because they didn’t trust telephonic meeting as secure.
Chief Justice Roberts was screaming
“Are you going to be responsible for the rioting if we hear this case? Don’t tell me about Bush v. Gore, we weren’t dealing with riots then! You are forgetting what your role here is Neil, and I don’t want to hear from the two junior justices anymore. I will tell you how you will vote.”
Justice Clarence Thomas says “This is the end of Democracy, John.”
When they left the room, Roberts, the Libs and Kavanagh had big smiles. Alito and Thomas were visibly upset. ACB and Gorsuch didn’t seem fazed at all.”
That story came from Hal Turner. Pamella Geller posted it with the supposed note or someting she showed from the “source making the claim. HAL Turner is far from reliable. Google you will find much about him. Early days, FBIstooge Days (cooptedmost likely)FBI arrest days to make him legitmate. or something, now he is back. HAL turner in the note his who the supreme clerk wrote. WHY hall Turner has many scrathing their heads. does not compute.
If you google him he is a long term voice against govt takeover. Then things changed. Put the Feds in the mix, rely on at your own risk
If the other- or “junior justices” are made to vote as they are told by the CJ, what is the point of having 7 of them?
Who died and made John Roberts god?
Clerks are hired as clerks after a thorough vetting process AND their careers are on the line if they break the code of silence.
One would hope that at least one Patriot would be among them.
I can only say that this was my very first thought as to why they denied the case.
Cowardice seems to be the coin of the realm in DC. John Roberts, Mitch McConnell…..the list is long. One odd thing, though, they are ALL Republicans.
Not cowardice. People keep confusing “cowardice” or “weakness” with being COMPLICIT.
John Roberts has been complicit in the corruption of the Supreme Court for eight years.
I used to think Mitch McConnell was a “coward.” He’s not. He is corrupt. He is complicit. That’s different than cowardice.
I emphatically disagree. It is FAR easier to be a coward and surrender to the temptations of evil and become “complicit” with them.
Complicit = Cowardice
OTOH, it require BACKBONE and MORAL COURAGE to stand up against evil forces when you know they are not above destroying or killing you for your opposition to them.
It seems to me that I have seen people (on the left) make statements about Trump using martial law. It seems to me that those statements were made well before the election took place. Why would they make such outlandish statements? Could it be that they envisioned every possible reaction to their crimes and have plans in place for each? Could it be that President Trump is aware of same and is hesitant to take the most extreme actions available to him because he already knows what their response will be and that the toll for going down that road will be high? As President of the United States of America, he alone must decide. President of ALL of the citizens of the United States of America… How high a price are they (all of them) willing to pay for Truth, Freedom and Justice… FOR ALL.
This is how you get the topic into the Public.
How to address riots and the encouragement of them by the Media, Dem, Etc.
I kept listening as they went over grammar and other details. And then I heard someone referred to as “Mister Pickle”?? That’s just funny right there.
The Supreme Court dropped off the Constitution off at a local Goodwill store with a note saying they were unable to take care of it and now it has been taken into care by 80 million plus guardians .