During the Texas presidential electors legislative session there was a debate over an amendment to wording where the Texas House would rebuke the Supreme Court of the United States for “moral cowardice” in not allowing the Texas challenge to be heard.
During the amendment debate Texas Congressman Matt Patrick (CD-32) put into the ¹record a report from a claimed “Supreme Court staffer” about an internal debate taking place within the high court where justices were arguing the reasons for not allowing the Texas election challenge to take place. As outlined by Patrick Chief Justice Roberts was worried about riots in the streets if the court heard the Texas arguments and evidence.
The exact statement comes at 01:32:31 of the debate video [prompted just hit play]
.
¹To be fair – It should be noted the claim comes with no specific citation for further review or analysis; and considering the heightened sense of concern over the election, more details should be requested before making assumptions about the described incident.
Question.
Why isn’t Roberts worried about riots from the voters who were wronged with the fraudulent election?
Of course, we may riot too. They only care about appeasing RATS. None of us matter. He needs a wake up call.
We have no track record of any activities other than good natured rallies.
We seem genetically unfit for much else, sadly.
Because Republicans don’t riot; and they know that.
and we should not!
G. Gordon Liddy, in his autobiography “WILL” wrote of entering the Department of Justice building at the height of the Veit Nam anti- war protests, to find uniformed infantry manning crew served light machine guns postitioned to cover the entrances. While the Supreme Court building may be lightly protected now, the US government has the men and means to do so. Lousy excuse in my book.
The Sons of Liberty must rise now!!
we expect corrupt courts to uphold any free people’s rights,, seems like insanity.
Scotus refused to look at the merits..because of “standing” we are told.
Potus, state legislatures do not have standing of a case based on voter fraud nationwide.
that tells us everything about black robed lawyers we need to know.
I don’t believe this. Sure, it might have been mentioned. But “afraid”? We have the means, as President repeatedly has said, to put down this kind of crap in about 30 minutes.
Well,
”What he read, what was heard, he was afraid, I believe” is all speculation and hearsay.
Take it with a grain of salt like Sundance notes.
Except that Trump doesnt have the power to do it unless he is given permission by that State’s Governor or pulls a Lincoln.
So basically, any Metro city in a Dem Gov state will be a flaming pit of chaos. (I’m ok with this)
U.S. Constitution – Article 4 Section 4:
The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.
It was just his excuse so he wouldn’t have to admit that he had already been bought. That’s my opinion anyway.
So Roberts just wants to give the anarchists what they want, is that the crux of it?
Just give them the whole damn country
Just give it to the mob
I can hear the calculation in my head:
“Well, the right won’t riot but the left will … so yada yada yada …”
If this leak is true and if it’s approximated honestly by the language upthread …
… then God bless the leaker, is what I say
Roberts thinks the tiger will eat him last!
Amen to that.
If this is true then arm yourselves. The DemocRATS have won the battle for YOUR republic.It is now up to YOU the people to take back YOUR country by force if necessary.
Kamala/ Pelosi and Obama will be in charge of our military.
Look at what cops are doing to those who disobey state/ city mask and lockdown tyranny. They do obey unlawful, unconstitutional orders against us.
All it takes is for Pelosi’s House and Schumer’s Senate to pass a law against us, then installed President Kamala signing it and they can change how the Pentagon functions.
Radical communists are set to take over.
Just wait til they see the attrition. Sad really, if it happens it’s going to be painful.
I guess the problem is that they simply didn’t believe that Patriots would riot if they DIDN’T hear the case.
We have been TOO SILENT for TOO LONG
They are trying to stampede the supporters of President Trump, into inconsiderate, too-precipitous action. They have been doing this AT EVEY STEP throughout Trump’s first term.
Harry, yes for four years they goaded us to do take action but we did not. For four years we emulated our Republican politicians. We whined mightily about the injustice but took no action. We took the high road.
Now we’re just high and dry.
At what point would you suggest a change in a failed strategy?
I dont know…you tell me….
If I say hey….Can I have all your money, please?
I’m betting you’d say No.
Now if I put a gun to your childs head… I bet you reconsider that answer.
Violence and fear is effective. History proves it out much more often than asking nicely.
Back in 2017 the left was so afraid of red MAGA hats being worn everywhere, they staged people being treated violently for wearing one and had the press broadcast it for weeks. The consequence was outside of Trump rallies, you did not see many.
This was a very successful use by the left of a fear campaign.
Exactly.
I think it’s true, it fits Roberts’ MO.
He’s one vote and if others vote against him, so what? Frankly, I don’t buy the story.
Lin Wood posted this on twitter. He makes some extraordinary claims but, he’s a lawyer so I assume he knows what he’s doing.
“in phone conversation in 8/19, Justice John Roberts stated that he would make sure “the mother f#*ker would never be re-elected.” Roberts engaged in phone conversations with Justice Stephen Breyer discussing how to work to get Trump voted out.”
Forgot to subscribe
Roberts wants to do what his globalist handlers tell him to do. Fear of the mob is just their cover. Our culture no longer looks down on cowardice, just look at the response to Covid.
Here’s what’s inevitable, it’s already happened once. The SCOTUS was stuck regardless and still is.
The Dred Scott case, also known as Dred Scott v. Sandford, was a decade-long fight for freedom by a Black enslaved man named Dred Scott. The case persisted through several courts and ultimately reached the U.S. Supreme Court, whose decision incensed abolitionists, gave momentum to the anti-slavery movement and served as a stepping stone to the Civil War.
If you think about it, nearly every historical conflict in this country stemmed from nonsensical rulings by the Supreme Court yet these justices are not even elected by the people.
Yup,
But herein lies the problem, when we actually do vote on our lower courts in our states, it’s funny how most of the information we need is not available to us.
hmmm??
Yeah they keep trying to “elevate” things above the political process, while it is the political process exactly that finds a way to de-fang differences of opinion.
If the threat of riot influences the outcome of a court case, then it sounds like if you want to win you have to threaten to riot.
That’s the lesson being taught by Roberts and the Supreme Court.
President Trump’s 3 appointees are cowards.
Roberts may have stated riots as the reason, however the real reason is that Obama told him so. Too many compromised people in Washington.
not the last time some of these judges will be screaming.
supreme MOOTS rule ~ antifa, BLM & DNC will murder my family, burn my home….MAGA Patriots will not….therefore….serfs have NO standing against genocidal plutocrats
serfs have standing with Amendment 2… We just need to grow a set of balls and stand up for freedom…
If we ever do stand up, I’m afraid it’s going to be more like a berserker attack. Kind of brings to mind that song Jeremy by Pearl Jam.
Today must be my day to play the Devils Advocate. With legislation and court cases I always want to see what unintended consequences there might be. When I heard the predicate Texas was using about one state not following their own rules and effecting the 2nd state, I immediately thought of the second amendment.
We may have dodged a bullet, for whatever reason, by SCOTUS refusal to hear the case on standing. Bear with me.
One of Chicago and Illinois states biggest claims as to why their gun control laws do not work is because of the lax laws in the surrounding states. They maintain the guns all come from those states. In my opinion, and for several reasons, it is a flawed argument. But, I could certainly see an anti 2nd amendment legal zealot twisting this precedent and trying to run with it to SCOTUS.
And before the newbies here jump on me for being pro Chief Justice, understand that I am on record writing that I cannot stand the weak spined jellyfish of a human being, that is our Chief Justice Roberts.
Like I said, possible unintended consequences.
Please do not derail this into a 2nd amendment argument. Focus on the unintended consequences of a TX win in the SCOTUS of their case. Thanks.
You replied to yourself what I was thinking after reading your post.
I don’t believe the Dems are generally surprised by ‘unintended consequences’ — I think they are deliberate and clear as to the outcomes they desire. As the great Andrew Breitbart said shortly before his death at the 2012 CPAC (a must see if you haven’t watched it and I’m paraphrasing), the hard Left plot and plan and don’t rest. They are pernicious in their conniving lies to attain the outcomes they seek. Most are grifters (like Biden), willing to sell us out for a buck. But many are true believers that we were born of theft and greed and capitalism must be quashed.
Conservatives, on the other hand, try to wrap our minds around potential risks associated with new laws and regulations, and do not condone ends justifying their means for ideologic reasons.
We cannot lower ourselves to their level, but it just makes serving justice that much harder.
That’s a good point.
>When I heard the predicate Texas was using about one state not following their own rules and effecting the 2nd state,
No, it wasn’t about a state violating their own rules, it was about a state violating the US Constitution. Which they did.
Wrong. The case was the other states abrogated their own state laws by using orders instead of the state legislatures to relax the voting rules. Had nothing to do with the US Constitution.
It is still a state violation not a Federal violation. The offending state violating it’s own constitution and laws harmed another state. A US Constitutional violation would have had standing would it not?
My problem with your reasoning is that the result of their inaction could well lead to the loss of 2nd,1st, 4th amendment rights. To often people think the enemy will do the right thing if you cave, not so, the more you relinquish the more they want.
I agree. There’s never enough for the Left. When they get all what they demanded it is never enough. They want more. They live in chaos.
Not the same. Texas is saying the ILLEGAL actions of PA harmed them.
Gun laws in other states are Constitutional and legal.
Agreed, but, for example, how many times have they twisted the commerce clause into something completely unrecognizable and into what it is today?
Thats a whole different discussion.
I’m saying your reasoning isnt good for them rejecting on the basis of getting “flooded” with cases. (scotus used to take a lot more cases)
I didn’t say flooded. I mentioned one hypothetical.
Illinois saying “those surrounding states are too lax on guns, but hey, they’re following their own laws as passed, we just don’t like their laws” is NOT the same as Texas saying “those cheating states broke the very election laws they themselves passed”
The 2nd Amendment (like the 1st) equally applies to all citizens in all states. State and local governments have usurped this right from the citizenry over the years. No government including the federal government has the right to curtail these rights under the Constitution, even though they do. It will continue this way until we have some sort of reset in our Republic.
unless the supreme court aide is wiling to identify himself or herself, the overheard alleged statements by any justice should be disregarded. otherwise, anyone (even fools) could claim anything was said by anybody. this seems like gossip which does not deserve our attention or consideration. why act like the mainstream media and repeat unsubstantiated gossip? we need more reliable information rather than gossip.
The clerk who overhead, or in fact, witnessed the discussion about riots who not only be fired he would be prosecuted, railroaded and sent to prison. Everyone here knows that!
Swear under penalty of perjury. And next time, use your cell phone to record the screaming. They have no right to privacy if it can be heard through walls.
Wood is also floating Epstein pedo allegations against Roberts.
This is INSANE.
Again, Roberts is the CHIEF JUSTICE. Not a caricature.
Without evidence, Wood faces disbarment – at the very least.
He also blows his own credibility, which weakens the #MAGA drive in the courts.
Not just that. Wood has endangered the whistleblower (if that’s the source). Of course those in power will know who this person is.
Let’s pray that the evidence will surface, because this is not good.
https://social.quodverum.com/@REX/105397369996012239
Right or wrong, Lin wood is fighting his best fight.
I agree
Has Roberts sued Lin Wood yet for slander?
NO
And I predict he wont
What, then, would make Roberts levy an unconstitutional tax for Obamacare? They have something on him, period. End of story. I don’t care what it is. He is a sellout, afraid of his legacy. Or money or whatever.
I think it’s nothing more than for a couple of decades or more, it’s simply been “cooler” in urban, affluent suburban communities of professionals to be liberal rather than conservative.
Some justices and chief justices care about how they are perceived by academia and by their social peers.
They move to the left.
Roberts thinks the cool guys will hate him if he’s too conservative. He’s correct. They would.
I’ve read the Epstein flight log with a John Roberts listed on the manifest. Same man? Don’t know….but I’ve seen some extremely shady shenanigans by a so called conservative justice.
Theres a copy of the flight log up at Gatewaypundit today
Yea. Let’s NOT fight like them. (Sound of hand slapping forehead)
He wouldn’t say it if he didn’t have proof. He stated he has proof.
Justice John Roberts flew on the Lolita Express…
Fact!!!!!!!!
He’s compromised.
Sure would explain his actions and why Schiff says He trusts Justice Roberts…
Page 559,and 562.
John Roberts is there.
Epstein docs
https://twitter.com/IncurableW/status/1339669869135081472
How many “John Roberts” are there in the United States? Isn’t there a Canadian MSM News reporter named John Roberts? Just a few weeks ago there was a “John Roberts” who was a computer tech guy who claimed he was the “John Roberts’ on Epstien’s flight log. Who’s going to know?
Mr. Wood has certainly earned the right to be proud of the defamation work he has done toward helping his clients who were falsely accused of crimes and bad actions, but this claim, accusing a sitting Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court of flying to Epstein’s island walks a pretty thin line where Mr. Wood might end up experiencing the other side of flamboyant accusations.
Yep, Might as well be John Smith. Now the picture floating around with this is interesting, but who knows about that one either.
Incorrect speculation, presented as fact, eventually undermines your argument. So much so, that no matter how good your argument is, it will forever be tainted.
How many ‘John Roberts’ are wealthy, powerful or connected enough to get an invite to Epstein’s island? I am suspecting the number is one.
If it isn’t true, then Chief Justice John Roberts can sue Lin Wood. Which is what Lin Wood likely knows or is gambling won’t happen.
I would like to see that happen!
I bet he wont
If we all do that, how can he sue 80 m Americans?
He has already punished us the SOB
did you look at that tweet thread?
All of it…..
How many people on the Epstein logs are bit players?
Are they more likely to sit on the Bartsville Chamber of Commerce or work on K Street?
Do blackmail campaigns cast massively wide nets or set nets to catch fish which give them maximum leverage?
Not saying Lin Woods is right but there are only so many John Roberts who fit the profile; Fox News and Chief Justice.
I don’t know what he’s doing. It seems reckless and makes claims of voter fraud seem reckless by association.
Epstein Island was set up specifically to entrap and blackmail influential politically connected people. Its true purpose was not fun and pleasure, and nobody got an invite without a reason. Now tell me again how it could have been just any old John Roberts….
“Who’s going to know?”
“We caught them all…”
President Donald J. Trump
Unless it’s the truth. Truth is still an absolute defense against defamation in the U.S.
And if Roberts DOESN’T sue we’ll know he’s afraid. Why afraid if he wasn’t on the flight?
https://twitter.com/LLinWood/status/1339659337208250369
Is Justice (ahem) Roberts in Malta?
President Trump tweeted:
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/220981019753451521
The date on his tweet is July 5, 2012, 8+ years ago.
Do you think he went to pedo island yesterday?
yup
I assume that Roberts, ACB,Kavanaugh, and Gorsuch will take responsibility for what happens going forward. We will have to provide the justice denied by these cowards.
Cowards…let US take care of the rioters…we will break their backs.
https://twitter.com/Jhomes551/status/1339683549184712706
And I bet this is why Roberts is so anti Trump
Pres Trump probably hit a nerve
Roberts et. al. never had the ‘choice’ to hear the case or not. This is the only court in the land that can hear a case and extend or deny relief to the plaintiff state, when challenging another state, or states.
The word, “standing” had no business being thrown out there as an excuse to terminate the Texas case. THEY HAD AN OBLIGATION to docket this case and hear the merits of the case, or the lack thereof.
That we allowed that to happen, is on us.
Roberts has proven himself biased and agendized since his blatant usurpation of the COTUS in his Obamacare ruling, to a favored outcome for an illegitimate president to begin with. But he got away with it without one ruffled feather. I bet there were fist bumps and high fives all around.
At the time, our voices were never heard, actually some were heard, but ignored. Our mistake was not speaking up louder. Or maybe because we didn’t riot in the streets, because “that wasn’t who we were”.
I would suggest in case President Trump cannot invoke his EO and the military to rectify this election theft, that we stop blogging about our troubles and tribulations, and start bringing forth in forum format just how are we going to stop our rogue and renegade government.
Just spend your next available free moment trying to game out how we the people would bring the insurrection.
If you are honest about it, it will be a monumental task to overcome(understated). For example, communications. Our much more powerful adversary will shut down all modern forms of communications so that we remain isolated and therefore, non-threatening. Heck, we would not even be able to determine who is friend and who is foe, save for the few good people we already know.
This is but one example. There is food and water. Easy, if you remain home. But if you are home, you are only defending, and rightly so. To win a war, you gotta move. So now there is transportation and mobilization issues. We are not prepared or equipped to overcome any of these basic needs, because we have sometimes carelessly handed over the reigns of power over these last six decades or so, little by little, one small change in law, or one more surrender of a right, or any small retreat from the language war, where we might give up a word, a term, or a phrase to the left because it’s too much bother to say “no”, that word or phrase does NOT mean what you say it means.
I’d like to think that I could go downtown and just demand that members of congress and of course the judicial and executive branch elites be tried and convicted of the sedition they have and are committing , and be bounced from the hallowed halls. Especially Roberts. I’d like to roll him down those marble steps, head first.
But it ain’t gonna work out that way. I need some Ideas beyond being a patriotic sapper. I bet you guys do, too. I don’t want to be the guy they make an example of, because there was no one to have my back.
All suggestions, comments, criticisms, and guffaws are welcome.
I’m thinking we patriots should be stopping the insurrection that’s happening now. I am against any insurrection because I like my country. Everything we talk and argue about here, every day, has laws on the books to control and the trouble is laws are not enforced and or enforced unequally. It’s illegal to plan and carry out an insurrection. I want to throw the people in jail who are doing exactly that.
If it is “illegal to plan & carry out an insurrection”, Why was it ever acceptable for our own Country to have been founded by Insurrection?…and why is it then somehow not acceptable for our system to be changed by the very same method by which it was founded?
The Answer seems to be: As long as you “Win”, you get to make the Rules.
I wouldn’t post that information in an open, public forum where any lefty can read and disseminate what’s been said a by whom (even under an avatar). Why give it to them on a silver platter?
Just sayin. (still wishing CTH had a “back room”)
I think for starters maybe a forum which requires several authentications because I think there are many
#DemScum lurkers here
Either way, there will likely be riots in the streets. You can’t just disenfranchise 75+ million voters without that consequence. It’s sad that the SCOTUS has no backbone and it comes to this point.
If you think about it…All Governments are variant forms of Mob Rule…dressed up with fancy language and documents to pretend otherwise. And at its very “Core” as “Humans” are by Definition, a Specie of Animal, Governments are nothing more than a System by which the “Preferred” Animals Control all of the other Animals.
Reminds me of a book by a Mr Orwell, something about barnyard creatures.
I remember reading it a decade before 1994…
prior to A Courageous, Modern Planet like the one the Left is trying to create….
or some combination thereof
Concern (fear) about riots?
If that “concern” over-rides oath and duty…., ~> STEP DOWN!
Rumor has it:
Johnheretohelp had tweeted not too long ago that Roberts would retire.
John on Twitter: “FB-i under Obama Biden were going to kill several Scotus judges so they could pack the court. They succeeded once ? ? ? https://t.co/rpqDCdU4tV” / Twitter
“John” needs to be institutionalized.
Ryan White: “John” came out.
That is bull shit. Jesus. The pillow was askew according to an article and ever since then a bunch of looneys are convinced an 80+ year old male with a heart condition serious enough that he made regular visits to a cardiologist and took heart medicine was murdered. Most males of Justice Scalia’s generation never made it to 80.
It certainly hasn’t bothered Roberts that ANTIFA, BLM and Blacks have been rioting, looting and attacking the police in cities all across the country for the past six months. If it did bother him he never came out and said as much?
In the first place, an honorable Supreme Court justice would never tolerate the existence of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) and would protest by refusing to appoint anybody to the FISC since where does a secret court like the FISC fit inside the Constitution?
Instead, Roberts personally appointed every judge on the current Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court and by law, he is suppose to oversee the activities of the FISC to make sure they aren’t just rubber stamping surveillance warrants.
This means that Roberts has to have been aware of all the FISC warrants against the Trump campaign which is why I always questioned why nobody in Congress ever bothered to subpoena FISC judges, especially Roberts, to get them to testify on the questionable activities of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court against Trump campaign staff.
Lastly, I always found it strange how nobody on the Supreme Court questioned Roberts ability to appoint and confirm judges to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court when he is neither the president nor the Senate.
According to the Constitution, only the president is allowed to appoint federal judges to specific jurisdictions while only the Senate is allowed to confirm the federal judges appointed by the president.
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Foreign_Intelligence_Surveillance_Court
IF TRUE. Aside from the obvious cowardice, and it may be a weak attempt at suggesting that he fears one thing when in fact he fears another (of a more personal nature) what this creep is saying is he has no fear of Rs or the right because, I guess, he considers them more obedient. The court can screw them to the wall and they won’t bother him like the Left will.
See, this guy wants to sit on the highest court in the land but apparently feels that he shouldn’t have to display personal courage, integrity and resolve. It’s not that half of the country was screwed (and roberts seems willing to disenfranchise them, but not the Left) the whole world sees this. The entire planet has access, despite the vain attempts at control and censorship, to alternative media. Worse yet many have experienced this too and recognize the scam.
I’m guessing we all scratched our heads and wondered, all summer long, what the dems knew that we didn’t. That goof ball harris, joe in the basement, no excitement, no demonstrated EFFORT to campaign. We all probably thought wtf, how are they gonna win like that? Now we (like other third world scheisse hole countries around the world) know. They cheated on scale others have seen but not Americans. It was clumsy and in your face because they don’t care. It almost seems like they want us to know so they like during the 8 dismal years of obama could say, prove it.
Trouble is, we can, we always could but the fix is in the ds has circled the wagons and the system is protecting them. Now is the time for courage not a SCOTUS style (fearful) stiff arm.
This is wrong on so many levels but the one that keeps coming back to me (since I still have a couple of naive molecules in my dna) is why hasn’t a single dem piped in? Are they that corrupt, that empty and ugly that they want biden/harris that bad they would OPENLY cheat in the most ham fisted way for those two? They have long had the rep but now it’s official. They are the party of CHEATERS.
Roberts hates Trump, plain and simple. He will do anything to get Trump out of office. Ted Cruz has said so much.
Trump, you’d think, would learn that public poking of a Scotus cj can’t end well.
Kavanaugh got a good public poking from the Dems. So far I am waiting for it to not end well.
So he’s just suppose to act obsequious to them?
Ridiculous.
The suit is back on the docket- Texas refiled it yesterday
I still believe it’s all China. China is here. Everything is arranged. We will have no capitalism, no representation, no firearms, no courts, no money, no property. Wear a mask forever and beg for your food and healthcare. No education. Americans are the slowly boiled frog that hasn’t noticed. Trump is not part of this but EVERYONE AND EVERYTHING ELSE IS.
For the same reason it’s highly unusual that even one House members votes against a position taken by Pelosi. Fear.
Matt Patrick is not a congressman. He was a presidential elector. Though Texas law does not require it, some parties choose electors by congressional district (they are chosen at the state convention, by CD caucuses).
I certainly wouldn’t doubt if this story is true. It’s been clear since Roberts Obozocare ruling that the law to him is secondary to his personal concerns. Good article on the downward spiral this failure to rule on the Texas case will lead to.
https://redstate.com/scotthounsell/2020/12/17/the-supreme-court-has-set-a-ridiculously-dangerous-precedent-n294978
Seem like our President has great psychic power.
Donald J. Trump on Twitter: “Congratulations to John Roberts for making Americans hate the Supreme Court because of his BS https://t.co/Vlyj8nKx” / Twitter
It wasnt psychic, the Obamacare Ruling, calling it a tax, after that folks figured the fix was in then and they had dirt on Roberts.
He has been worthless when needed the most since then, as has ALL Federalist Society Judges or Justices
BTW, could someone please post that picture of the SC with the 3 donkeys, 4 chickens with Alito and Thomas. Such a fitting portrait. ?
Not their job to worry !
Job is to judge the law and constitution ! GRRRRRRR.
We can take care of the miscreants………
DO YOUR FRICKING JOB !
“Worried about riots” is an Insane Left talking point. They want you hysterical with fear. Roberts is a traitor, and he has suborned all of the President’s Supreme Court picks, to NOT ADDRESS THE ELECTION FRAUD. That is patently obscene (as was the election itself, as I knew it was almost certain to be, with no one recognizing and confronting the enemy).
DON’T listen to fear-promulgation from a traitor.
Anybody notice the hysterical “cyber attacks” on the USA are just the latest, in a continuous line going back to the very beginning of President Trump’s first term? AND, right on schedule, to try to shut down criticism of the presidential election vote fraud. These traitors are NOTHING if not timely (you’ve heard of “just in time” industrial processes?…their treason is the same, right on the button when they need it) I HAVE to wonder if Ratcliffe is listening to the wrong people in Intelligence.
I think believing in this new report of foreign interference, before we have indentified all of the enemy within the reporting, intelligence community, is not a good idea. Again, this just looks to me like more CIA obfuscation, making the “tangled web” for our domestic enemies’ benefit.
The silence of the big name Trump supporters is quite telling…..
Nobody touching this story with a 10 foot pole…..
The Big Ugly – seeing the frauds pretending to represent us as they siphon money.
Sundance calls it the wings of the same bird. I call that bird the Globe State
Let me say it nicely. Roberts and the SCOTUS are cowards. Roberts is a failed cheif justice. Comp’ed 200%!
Been saying this for weeks.
ALL are afraid of the terrorists coming to their homes, harming their families. When SOCTUS cannot hear a case due to FEAR – WE HAVE LOST OUR REPUBLIC.
Terrorism is defined in the Code of Federal Regulations as “the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives” (28 C.F.R. Section 0.85).
We have SURRENDERED…
let me put this in perspective.
Our Law of the Land provided legal means to address grievances including the last resort of the People Firing the Representative.
The Republic has not been Lost. The potential belief in the realness of this agreement has been lost.
Make no mistake of thinking this Republic can ever fall.
Why? Because its steps of preservation ends in the same way it was founded.
This country can never fall by design.
How do we Fire them ?
How ?
If you say voting you have not been paying attention. They have taken our vote away ….
In one state WITH THREAT OF GUNS ! Armed Cops not letting our electors in to vote BY THREAT OF GUNS !
We walk up the house in each country – city – state and lock the door. the sheriffs and police STRIKE WITH US at the same time. THE truckers shut down.
all people stop wrking for 2 weeks.
The statement came from an article on Hal Turners website Dec 13, now deleted…. He received the email directly from the person who heard it. Hal Turner is former FBI for over a decade and is a whistleblower. Now has a radio show out of NJ.
Here’s the entire conversation as reported.
Chief Justice Roberts was screaming “Are you going to be responsible for the rioting if we hear this case?”
“Don’t tell me about Bush V Gore, we weren’t dealing with rioting then.”
“Are you forgetting what your role here is Neil, and I don’t want to hear from the 2 junior justices anymore. I will tell you how you will vote.”
Justice Clarence Thomas says “This is the end of Democracy, John.”
When they left the room, Roberts, the Libs and Kavanaugh had big smiles. Alito and Thomas were visibly upset. ACB and Gorsuch didn’t seem fazed at all.
Roberts can be guaranteed of riots in the streets by refusing to see the evidence. This act of cowardice may be the spark that lights this country on fire.
Travelled to DC last weekend for election fraud rallies. Went to dinner at Trump International Hotel Friday evening (and Saturday). When we entered, there was no one outside except for the security at the points of entry. During dinner, the Supreme Court issued its decision to reject the Texas et.al case. When we left, there were riot police in full gear (masks, flak jackets, shields) shoulder to shoulder around the perimeter of the hotel. Clearly, someone expected rioting. My guess is word was out that the decision was coming down and riot police were dispatched to before they knew which way the decision went. Otherwise, why expect an attack on the Trump Hotel?
No doubts as to the validity. Roberts is spineless and yes the dems would have rooted. Now decent citizens are supposed to sit still. Police and National Guard, allowed to act, would shut it down.
DC is a swamp of traitors and worse. The Republic is dead.
I was wrong, article still there, it was December 12. https://halturnerradioshow.com/index.php/en/news-page/news-nation/loud-arguments-in-us-supreme-court-chambers-over-texas-lawsuit-court-intimidated
“I WISH I COULD GIVE YOU A SPECIFIC CITATATION FOR THIS”
Written by current staffer.
I call BS
Screaming through the walls
Roberts: “I dont give a — about that case
At that time we didnt have riots”
Time to riot guys
We have been too passive
Our rights have been steadily eroded
We have been targted by the left EVERYWHERE- IRS, MEDIA, STREETS, TEARING
DOWN SIGNS ATTACKING AND KILLING OUR SUPPORTERS
E N O U G H
Time to take Roberts down
BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY
I suggest every time we tweet or write about Roberts we add the moniker:
“Moral Coward ROBERTS to it.
Same with the other SCOTUS judges except Allito and Clarence Thomas
This may be most important tweet of my life.Chief Justice John Roberts is corrupt &
should resign immediately. Justice Stephen Breyer should also resign immediately.
They are “anti-Trumpers” dedicated to preventing public from knowing TRUTH of
@realDonaldTrump re-election.
— Lin Wood (@LLinWood) December 17, 2020
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/chief-justice-john-roberts-corrupt-resign-immediately-attorney-lin-wood-goes-scorched-earth-scotus-chief-justice/
I had read this statement herre befiore and sign they should all be questioned under oath iimmediately.
I think a rumor like that without a credible source is not worth repeating. My current thinking is that the S Ct view is that the power is with the state legislatures to fix this, i.e., there is a constitutional “breaker” already in place which is readily available and designed by the Founders to permit We The People to exercise their authority. Which happens to be true. But I think the S CT is also not through yet. The cases are piling up, they are looking for something, so don’t lose heart just yet.
BTW, he’s not worried about rioting the streets, he’s worried about rioting at his house.
I actually read that several days ago. Although I wouldn’t put it past Weasel Roberts, I considered it a larp. Like Sundance’s footnote, until these sources are named consider it news porn. Surprised it made into the Texas legislative session. :0
Being discussed on Greg Kelly Show on Newsmax right now.
Military tribunals are not intimidated by thugs.
Stupid reason! They weren’t worried about riots during the summer!!!
He’s not worried about any riots. He’s worried about the massive amount of election fraud evidence, knowing how hard it would be to come up with a ruling against the President
Sundance footnotes: “¹To be fair – It should be noted the claim comes with no specific citation for further review or analysis; and considering the heightened sense of concern over the election, more details should be requested before making assumptions about the described incident.”
The incident RINGS TRUE. It passes the smell test! Sounds to me like Roberts, in his extreme arrogance and winged by the arrogant libs, RAILROADED the Trump appointees. I suspect he made the decision as CJ to reject the case WITHOUT EVEN TAKING A VOTE! That would explain the ruling. Dunno why BK was smiling, except that he has likely been the most severely threatened of Trump’s 3.
“The only thing that God does not tolerate is arrogance.” –Sri Sri Ravi Shankar
“ Pride [i.e. arrogance] goeth before destruction, and an haughty spirit before a fall.” Proverbs 16:18
Roberts cares more about riots from communist then he does about this country ?
When are we gonna find out about his compromised condition from Osama ?
Roberts should have a midnight door kicked in and be interrogated to see who’s holding what over his head.
https://twitter.com/LLinWood/status/1339637980927991808
· 6h
In discussing @realDonaldTrump in phone conversation in 8/19, Justice John Roberts stated that he would make sure “the mother f#*ker would never be re-elected.” Roberts engaged in phone conversations with Justice Stephen Breyer discussing how to work to get Trump voted out.